| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No and Jay G gave the reason why I would never.
|
08-07-10 07:35am
|
Reply
2752
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
I didn't find their older content to be as abusive as what they've produced in the last couple of years but it was still pretty extreme hardcore porn. The good thing about joining this site and making a review is that other's won't waste their money on this network. Some of us get burned so that others don't.
|
08-06-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
2753
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I don't think it will happen anytime soon and It doesn't make good business sense for them to offer all the sites in a network.
Kink is possibly the top BSDM company at the moment and they have some of the best content on the net. For them to keep offering such good content means that they have to pay talent and that cost money.
Your idea of a token system that allows you to download certain scenes from each site is not a bad idea but again it would mean less money for them then if you have to join each site on it's own. At the moment they offer streaming and download to won but I don't think the cost is worth it.
Someone has already said that once you join one site then you automatically get reduce price for the others and they even offer a two for one deal where you get 2 months for the price of one.
I've joined at least 4 of their sites and I've never been disapointed with any of them. If you like their content then you should want to pay for it. You money will mean more content and that's a good thing.
|
08-05-10 07:33pm
|
Reply
2754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked a middle of the road answer and said sometimes because I wasn't too sure if it mean that all the pictures were censored or that some of the content was. If all of them are censored then how are you going to know whetehr this is a good or bad site. If they censor some of their more popular pictures but offer some good selection in the hopes that you'll pay to see the good stuff then that's fine.
|
08-05-10 07:21pm
|
Reply
2755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's very important otherwise all your watching are a couple of people screwing without any heat or passion. Why I find a lot of todays porn less than memorable.
|
08-03-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
2756
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
My membership expired last week and I was a member a couple of years ago and little has changed. It makes sense for them to remain this way because they are still getting customers. Their search options aren't the greatest but you can do a search using the models name and get access to all her content with one click. IMO they have the best download options on the net when it comes to video and they hold their own against many other on the photo side as well.
The only thing that I can fault them is that their videos are too short. I'd prefer longer videos.
|
08-02-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
2757
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
The good thing for me is that many of the girls appearing on this site have done movies for Girlfriend Films and with those movies I get the full package: a storyline, clothes, tease, dialogue, kissing and sex. This is what I'd like to see on this site. I know there is a vast market for it. Hopefully somebody with money will do it.
|
08-01-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
2758
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
My biggest issue with this site is that it's only kissing. I think we don't see it often enough in porn today but I still want the rest that usually follows. I would never join this site even if they offer full length scenes in HD. I'll always feel that it's more tease than anything else. The day that they add actual sex between the player is the day I join ths site.
|
08-01-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
2759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer the complete package. I tend to feel cheated when the cameran keeps focusing on only certain parts or if he avoids some completely.
|
08-01-10 10:15am
|
Reply
2760
|
Hardcore Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
This site contains only leased content. You can visit smackmybitch to see all their content and much more. I don't know if it's a typo on their join page but they claim that you get access to the entire tenncoreclub.com network with a membership. If it's true then it's a saving of at least 20$ since I joined teencoreclub.com for 50$.
I'm kind of pissed at the moment. I hope youi can confirm whcih site you actually get.
|
07-31-10 01:16pm
|
Reply
2761
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I sometimes feel guilty about watching porn but that usually happens if I see a certain type of scene or performer.
|
07-30-10 07:03pm
|
Reply
2762
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
Good sites should get good reviews but bad sites really deserve bad reviews. I think that you should write a full review simply because that will help sway more people than a simple comment.
|
07-28-10 06:47pm
|
Reply
2763
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think I've written a positif or negative comment to a webmaster but I have written about an issue once or twice. I've gotten satisfaction everytime it happened but sometimes it takes a day or two to get it.
|
07-28-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
2764
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
killahla's Review
I got access to this site through my hugestraponlesbian membership and I found that the content was too similar between both sites. The biggest difference is that you have one girl and her toys on brutal dildos and 2 girls with strapons and dildos in hugestraponlesbian.
I'm pretty sure that this site was bought by the people that own the norestfortheass.com or use the same studio for their content because it's all the same performer and the exact same style of porn.
|
07-26-10 08:21pm
|
Reply
2765
|
Double Teamed Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
killahla's Review
It's true that most scenes lack a certain amount of heat. I'm not sure if it's the people responsible for the site or the fact that they often have some real newbies to hardcore. This tends to make the scene appear boring because the girls is overwhelmed with what's happening to her. Not too mention that it's pure gonzo with all the scene looking the same and filmed the same way on the same stage.
|
07-26-10 08:11pm
|
Reply
2766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mistresskent's Poll
I wouldn't because I prefer to keep my fantasies exactly where they are. In my head.
|
07-26-10 08:06pm
|
Reply
2767
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
My biggest issue is not so much the sites I got with my membership because I knew that ahead of time. It's the way they treat the girls and frankly I can't stand their style of BJ. I don't enjoy watching vomit in anything and that goes double for porn. Vomit=deadwood.
|
07-26-10 08:04pm
|
Reply
2768
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
bjajlt362's Comment
Thanks for the info. I was wondering why we got so many new reviews of the site. Not to mention that I now understand what karl was talking about when he said he wanted his free magazine.
|
07-25-10 06:21pm
|
Reply
2769
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Reply
I was a little suspicious when the second one appeared. At least karl was honest about his reason for doing it and I checked out the forum. The site is still updating but it's usually with just one page from one of the comics or maybe some art work. If you like the content than it's worth a one time membership but I can't see too many people remaining long term members.
|
07-25-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
2770
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
karl1984's Review
Where exactly did you find those frequent updates? That site has almost no updates and hasn't had too many in the last few years. I know because I checked his most recent stuff and there are only a couple of new comics since the last time I was a member and we're talkaing about 2 yrs ago.
|
07-25-10 08:37am
|
Reply
2771
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
Reply of
duckmaster's Review
You won't find this style anywhere else because as far as I know he only draws comics for his own site. I joined it a few years ago and it wasn't bad but it's only worth a one time visit because he hasn't done too much updating since the last time I was a member.
I've been a member of a couple of other comic sites but all of them are reposotory of other artist work. Let me know if you'd like some suggestions.
|
07-24-10 08:20pm
|
Reply
2772
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I didn't get access to those sites. They've altered the sites you
get with your membership. I think the last time I was a member you had those sites but not anymore. Of the ones that I got. I would say that only nasty little facials is still updating regularly with actual new content and not leased material.
I took a look at the 3 sites you mentioned and I don't recognize any of these girls so I can't say if they are new. I can say that none of the ones I looked at have had a bigger porn career beyond these sites.
|
07-24-10 08:12pm
|
Review
2773
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They update with a new scene once a week.
-Membership includes access to 7 other sites.
-Interesting mix of amateur/newcomers and well established performers.
-Movies can be streamed in flash.
-You can download the movies in various fomats which include wmv, quicktime, ipod/iphone & mpg.
-They offer hi-def in 1280x720, 1440x1080 or 192x1080 for movies made from 2007 and after.
-You can download about 4 scenes at a time without a download manager(avg time is 15min).
-You can download the pic sets in zip format. |
| Cons: |
-The senes have a fairly strong mysoginistic feel to them. You don't get a sense that they are trying to film a girl that enjoys this kind of sex as much as survives it. I guess it makes sense to call the site facial abuse but they could have called it pornstar abuse and it would have been just, if not more appropriate.
-If there is one site that feels like a graduate of the Max Hardcore school of pornography then this is the one. If you've seen what passes for porn in any of the movies Max made in the last few years then you will know what you'll get with this site.
-The pics are stills from the movies.
-Except for nasty little facials. All the other sites are either no longer updating or it appears to be leased content. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still wondering why I join this site again.
I didn't particularly enjoy it the first time and I think it's gotten worse or at least worse for me. I think the latest offer of 19.95$ and the fact that they had a couple of cuties may have blinded me to the awful fact that I really disliked Max style of choking, drooling, vomiting BJ and most of their updates now contain some if not all of these things.
These guys could easily take Max's place and except for the fact that Max would not be in the scene. No one would tell the difference. So if you saw any of the movies that Max made in the last few years and really liked that style then you will be thrilled by this site.
Anyone who did not enjoy Max's stuff should stay very far away or you will regret it.
I'm actually suprised by the number of fairly well known performers they've been able to get seeing as this is not the stuff you'd expect to see them do.
I debated what score I should give them because although I did not enjoy most of the content. The site is technically pretty well done and is sure to satisfy people that enjoy this type of porn. Not to mention that I found a couple of scenes in the other sites that had the same performer as facial abuse but the scene was more what I enjoy. |
|
07-24-10 11:57am
Replies (16)
|
Reply
2774
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I was a regular TBP visitor like Drooler and that's how I found PU. The only site that I trusted was TBP until PU. Now it's a toss up between these 2. I always visit TBP first and then come over to PU.
|
07-22-10 07:26pm
|
Reply
2775
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't think of one site that hasn't updated in a while and that I'd like to join but if I found one and their existing library appealed to me than I'd join once to get their content.
There are quite a few sites that aren't really updating with brand new content as much as older material that has gotten a major face lift.
Should these sites charge the same amount as they did when it was all new?
|
07-20-10 06:45pm
|
