| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2676
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I haven't joined any in October but I joined at least 2 last month. My problem these days is that I being lazy and not reviewing them.
|
10-02-10 07:14pm
|
Reply
2677
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
That scenario is unlikely to happen to me but I'd simply ask him to wait outside or better elsewhere
so that I don't have someone outside the door who's waiting for me to be through.
|
09-30-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
2678
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks I really needed that visual. Now I'm never going to have premature ejaculation problems because I'll never be able to get it up again.
|
09-28-10 02:45pm
|
Reply
2679
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I was a member in May of this year and I had no problem with the billing company when I chose not to renew. Some of the content can be found at Videobox and if you have bought any of Pierre's DVD's in the past then even more so.
A large amount is from is old Woodman Casting series that were released by Private and Hustler. I can't fault Pierre's decision to retain some exclusive material for his site because he does have a few scenes that have never seen the light of day anywhere but on his site and Pierre has always bbeen good at getting girls to do stuff for him that they haven`t done elsewhere.
The membership is a little expensive at 30 Euros and some of the content is just the interviews. As much as I might like to know some background on a favorite star. if there is no sex than it`s pretty boring.
|
09-27-10 07:53pm
|
Reply
2680
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
There are 5 reality porn sites that I keep track of their updates. Reality King, Naughty America, bangbros, blacks on blondes and Brazzer but I'm a member of Brazzer so that last one is a giver. I've notice a serious decline in the quality of updates at most of these sites and in some ways even at Brazzer. It does not bode well for the immediate future of many porn sites when the big guys can't make enough money.
|
09-27-10 07:39pm
|
Reply
2681
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I can't speak for reality king because I haven't been a member in a couple of months but I think that many of the sites are in trouble.
The recession which the Government claims is over is anything but over and the longer it last then the more we are going to see sites get affected by it.
|
09-27-10 06:53pm
|
Reply
2682
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
True the poll question was somewhat vague on what constitute nudity but I took it to mean a person devoid of clothing and nothing else.
If the poll question was going for a more philosophical apsect of nudity where it pertains to the nudity of the soul then I missed that.
I think Playboy and all adult oriented magazine intentionally use nudity as a sexual tool. I'd add fashion magazines that often use semi-nude models to advertise clothing and jewellery to the above list.
I agree that nudity in of itself is not sexuality and you've named some very good examples. I hope you'll agree that some guys go to nude beaches to check out the girls and not get their nether regions tanned.
I'll take your argument and add my twist to it.
Playboy has nudity, Playboy has sexuality. Therefore Playboy uses nudity for sexuality. They also have some great interviews... At least that's what I've been told.
Cobras are snakes. Cobras are poisonous. Therefore if you don't know for certain if a snake is poisonous then leave it alone. You don't want to be on the receiving end of a poisonous snake bite.
|
09-27-10 03:37pm
|
Reply
2683
|
Celebrity Spanker
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Hi Axel.
I won't join any site that has celebrity sex tapes on their preview pages because those sites are trying to get your money. If you visit celebritymoviearchive.com then you will see that they have some celebrity sex tapes but they don't advertise them. A site that has to use clebrity sex tapes to entice customers is sure to be a rip off. You can usually tell the sites that are made to steal your money if they offer any celebrity sex tapes that don't exist. If you see a site that has a Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohan sex tape then you know they are thieves. They may have done a sex tape but none have been released. I guarantee that you'll hear it when a famous person has a sex tape.
I don't mind if you want to join celebrity spanker but believe me when I tell you that you will regret it really fast.
|
09-27-10 03:07pm
|
Reply
2684
|
Celebrity Spanker
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Comment
My rule of thumb about any nude celebrity site is that if any use celebrity sex tapes on their preview pages then do not join for any amount and that includes 1$. You will regret wasting that dollar. I do give them credit for the join cost. TBP has them listed at 40$ which is too much money for a nude celebrity site.
|
09-26-10 05:39pm
|
Reply
2685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess I'm part of Slutty's Bozo squad because I do equate nudity with sexuality. Of course there are exceptions and monahan's is a very good one. I wonder if that 3am call had been a hoax and said 20yrs had answered the door completely naked and in perfect health. Would Monahan have had a different opinion about her nudity?
Are all of you that voted no, telling me that you believe that seeing a beautiful naked woman in a magazine or on a website is not sexual? If so then I must be the only person to have bought a Playboy for the naked pictures. It's art and it's sexual. It's not the same kind of art as a museum statue or painting but it's still an art form that is designed to elicit a sexual response. At least I think that's what Hugh had in mind. Slutty will have to be more specific about his nudity in art is too sexual for children statement to know where he's coming from.
|
09-26-10 05:30pm
|
Reply
2686
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
My biggst worry is not the recent server problems. That can happen to the best of sites but the fact that of the 13 latest updates. 5 are actually leased content available on a couple of other sites and
of the other 8. 3 of the updates are the same peformer in almost identical scenes. This network is 50$ and frankly I expect a lot more for that kind of money.
|
09-21-10 06:11pm
|
Reply
2687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I think some of the subjects we talk about aren't the kind that are easily broaoched in a regular social vsocial gathering. I suspect that if we knew each other in private then we might have similar discussions as we currently do but it would be in a cafe or something.
|
09-18-10 05:02pm
|
Reply
2688
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
A reduced pricing offer is the main reason why I renew with any site. It's not that I don't think the content is worth the original join price. The fact is that I only have a certain amount of money set aside for porn. If I want to try other sites than I have to make a choice. I can cancel my membership to a site and spend my money elsewhere or if I'm paying less to renew than that leaves some extra cash to join a second site.
|
09-17-10 06:45pm
|
Reply
2689
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm pretty sure that Nathalie is sarah and I have quite a few videos of this cutie. I only wish she spoke English or at least had some dvd's that include actual scenario porn.
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/sarah_5.html
|
09-15-10 07:16pm
|
Reply
2690
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My opinion of why a picture can be more erotic than a video is that a video requires your eye to keep track of the action and your brain has to wait for what is going to come next. A picture on the other end doesn't move and that allows your mind to imagine whathever you desire. Add the fact that just because a model is super gorgeous doesn't mean that she can act sexy and erotic.
The scenes that I consider the hottest and most intense are rarely with the most beautiful girls but often with a cute girl. I don't know if it's because the beautiful ones think they don't need to work at it to get guys excited since their beauty should be enough.
|
09-15-10 07:11pm
|
Reply
2691
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
I visit this site regularly to see the latest updates but the last time I visited I got the free 30 minutes offer. This was the first time that I was given this offer. I didn't take it but that's because I'm a past member and the current updates don't appeal to me.
|
09-14-10 06:59pm
|
Reply
2692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I put masturbation in the midcore category since it can mean a lot of different things from simple breast massage to full on fingering.
|
09-14-10 06:55pm
|
Reply
2693
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
There's been a general slowdown of updates on many European/Russian
sites in the last couple of months. The economy isn't picking up all that fast so eating takes precedence over porn as it should. I think many sites are suffering because of it and then you add all the tube sites. Hopefully they keep updating and retan that low price. The girls are really hot.
|
09-14-10 06:53pm
|
Reply
2694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I always expect more but I realise that I'm likely to be disapinted.
Who knows maybe one day coporations will look at their actions ahead of making another million.
|
09-13-10 05:50pm
|
Reply
2695
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another excellent review as always. I checked the site out again to see if you saw more updates but you still only see 18 videos on the preview pages. Their content is the same that can be found at smackmybitch but smack has significantly more content then 18x but it is twice the price of 18x. If they keep updating and retain this low price then they will be the site to join if you like these girls and videos.
If you are ever curious about the performers then visit ebi and simply search under smackmybitch to see which girls appears at that site. You'll be able to identify the girls from 18x and find out their more common name since 18x and smack use aliases for many of them.
|
09-12-10 07:24pm
|
Reply
2696
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I agree that parents should take a much larger role when it comes to the sexual education of their children but there comes time when a society has to look at itself and say we are over sexualising our youth and at the same time promoting bad role models. I know sex sells but shouldn't corporations have somekind of morale obligation to try to promote the best quality and use the best possible people to do that?
I don't consider myself prudish but I don't want to see a nude beach anywhere I live. I don't want nudity to be readily available on TV.
I think fashion magazines should be classified in the same way that Playboy or Hustler is. If their is a single nude or semi-nude pictures than you have to be 18 to buy it. I don't want any singer, actor or sports personality to advertise anything intended for children. I kow that last one is a stretch but if you think about it. These are the people speaking to our children on a daily basis and they don't even have to use a single word to get their point across. Their actions speak louder than words.
Sorry for the rant.
|
09-12-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
2697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can a society be really considered too uptight about nudity when it's so easily available in many different medias? You can see it in many fashion magazine. You can see it in all adult magazine. You can watch in on many very popular TV shows. It's in a large portion of movies and it's also on the internet.
Now you can argue that all of these are meant for an over 18 audience. The fact remains that I am certain underage children have seen nudity in many of the above medias and quite possibly simulated sexual intercourse and certainly if they have watched an most HBO shows of the last 5yrs.
The question we should be asking ourselves is are we exposing our children to too much sexuality at a very young age?
|
09-12-10 12:06pm
|
Reply
2698
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I agree 100% with the solo play. I really don't want to see that on any of their sites. You need at least 2 player per scene. It's too bad that they are only updating with B/g stuff at the moment. I keep getting emails for great Kink deals but I have to decline on the everything butt. I might try Public Disgrace.
|
09-12-10 11:53am
|
Reply
2699
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
I don't mind the fact that they started to include b/g shoots but now that's all they update. I was more than willing to have a mixture of g/g and b/g but I won't be joining this site unless they bring back some g/g shoots. I think it would be fair to alternate between one b/g and g/g shoot.
|
09-11-10 10:27am
|
Reply
2700
|
Real Celeb Scandals
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
All I know is that the names I gave you previously and which this site claims to have nude videos of is pure BS. Those celebrities have leaked naked pictures of them on the net and this site has taken those pictures and made as though they have videos.
It's possible that the site has nude videos of stars but why join a fraudulent site when you can get the samething from a known and reviewed site like Mrskin or celebrity movie archive.
|
09-09-10 07:34pm
|
