| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I said that it depends on the reviewer but it also could have been that it depends on the site being reviewed. Some sites just don't require a lot of info. There are some reviewers who write such amazing reviews that it's a pleasure reading what they have to say
|
11-11-10 06:30pm
|
Reply
2627
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
t9chome's Reply
I have noticed a reduction in the number of updates but like you said. The price of the membership is so low that it makes it's hard to complain. The quality is still there and that makes up for the reduction in updates.
|
11-10-10 05:28pm
|
Reply
2628
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'll edit my review and add which sites come with the membership. Hopefully they are always the same bonus sites. To answer your question. I joined fuck studies but the reason why you don't get it with teen maga world is because teen mega world is basically a one stop site for all the other sites update. I did a quick look and found at least 30 fuck studies videos and I'm pretty sure all 53 are on teen mega world.
|
11-08-10 06:32pm
|
Review
2629
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-08-10 06:47pm (Update History)
Reason: did not include which sites came with membership
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 20 other sites.
-all models are super cute teens.
-They have some of the first hardcore scene from girls just starting in porn.
-They now update with one new video a week and they currently have 53 videos.
-You can download videos in low, medium and high.
-Medium quality is 860x480.
-You can stream videos in Flash.
-Navigating from site to site is one click away.
-You can download photosets in zip format and the pics are 960x1440.
-Over 1300 videos available through all the sites.
-You can use a dowanload manager. |
| Cons: |
-Many of the sites are no longer updating.
-I believe that some of the content is leased.
-Quality in the older videos is not always the best.
-Some of the same models appear on more than one site.
-The name of the models is not necessarily the one you know them under.(they aren't as bas as others).
-Their search functions are not very good and I'd almost say not worth bothering with.
-Scene description don't always match content |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is for people that enjoy watching cute teens having hardcore sex and getting sodomized.
I'd say that anal is common in many of the other sites as well but there is still a large amount of standard b/g and g/g only videos.
I gave this site a much higher score based on the other sites since this site is still too small to justify a +90 score with only 53 video.
I would have given them a score of about 85 but if they keep updating regularly and also keep the qualtiy then it will definetely earn that +90 score all by itself.
I forgot to add which sites are included with my membership and their updates. lolly hardcore(still updating), teen stars only(last update March 2010), home teen vids(last update March 2010), teen sex mania(still updating), at movs(last update June 2010),
home toy tens(last update in September 09), private teen videos(last update December 09), solo teen girls(last update April 2010), gag n gape(last update November 09), old n young (last update April 09), teens 3 some(last update February 09), nubile girls HD(new stuff as of October 2010 but can't confirm beyond that),teen sex movs(still updating). |
|
11-07-10 06:26pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
2630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm sure mine was also an 8mm stag film. It would have been black and white and the quality would have been non-existent which is why it's not worth remembering. I remember some Italian softcore movies that Starred Edwige Fennech. Those weren't too bad.
|
11-07-10 09:12am
|
Reply
2631
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I usually try to fix the problem myself but that as less to do with the porn and more because of the cost of getting it fixed by a tech.
|
11-05-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
2632
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I seldom download the 1080p videos so I can't say but the medium quality videos look the same as the others. I'm going to download one and let you after I compare it.
|
11-05-10 06:51pm
|
Reply
2633
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The only difference would be that I try more sites.
I have enough flaoting cash to allow me to join a couple of sites each month but there are some that I would like to try but I just don't want to take the chance that it will be a piece of junk.
|
11-03-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
2634
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
It may be that their system although flawed for the customers still makes them more money because some customers will join more than one site in the hopes of getting all the content possible. I know I've joined different sites over the years and that has allowed me access to some sites that wouldn't have been included in one of the packages
I think their cluster of package deals is the main reason why this network has not gotten better scores because there is almost nothing else negative to say about it. By far it has been the best network that I've ever joined and certainly one of the least expensive in the long run.
|
11-02-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
2635
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I could also put up with new and flashy if there was actual intent to make a good porn movie. That is not the case. I've heard the arguments back and forth that it's this or it's that but in the end. I'm left with the feeling that it's a lack of actual talent behind the camera. Most of the guys directing porn today couldn't get a job directing traffic. The guys in the 70's and 80's had to have talent because they understood that a sex film without a story was a basic little loop film. Great for backrooms but it was never going to sell tickect in a theater. I think many have forgotten that there were porn theaters and you needed a product that would attract a wide range of customers so gonzo style would never have made any money to the theater ownwers and these were the people that made you money. VHS and Beta kind of killed porn theaters but they were still being made by the same people so these guys wanted to make a decent product.
I'm not jaded about all porn. I'm just jaded about crappy new porn. I can still watch Seka, Arcadia Lake, Lysa Tatcher,Veronica Hart and all those women that made porn fun to watch.
|
11-01-10 07:58pm
|
Review
2636
|
Gapeland
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Automatic access to 29 other sites.
-Some of the sites offered with this membership aren't available through some of the other sites.
-They update with one new scene a week.
-They have some models not on any of the other 21 sextury sites.
-Dowload managers are accepted.
-Videos come in both h.264 and wmv and from low quality to ultra high quality.
-Going from site to site is just a click away.
- |
| Cons: |
-The biggest drawback is that there are only 15 videos currently available so you should join only to get access to the other sites for now.
-Some of the girls appearing on this site have anal videos on the network so you aren't going to get a new girl so much as a new perspective.
-Some of the sites offered are dead sites since the content hasn't been updated in years.
-Unless there is a chnage then this package will never give you access to Club Sandy or Pix and Video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was planing to rejoin 21sextury and I knew that this was one of their newest sites so I took a chance and I'm not disapointed with what I got. Not necessarily for this site as much because 15 videos is not a very big library but because of what you get with the package. I think it will still take me the same amount of months to get full access to all the sites but I will have access to 45 sites. That's 5 more sites then what I used to get with my pix and video membership.
My score is mostly based on the complete network package. |
|
11-01-10 07:45pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2637
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I've seen my share of swallowing scenes and I can take them or leave them. I was somewhat curious when they started filming the multiple swallowing scenes/movies but after you've seen a girl swallow 6 loads and more then the curiosity quickly gets replaced with a certain revulsion. It's one thing to swallow one guys load but when you start to gargle with it or make cum bubbles then you have left me far behind sick to my stomach.
|
11-01-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
2638
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
There is no way to prove it but I think that a large part of why so many updates on Videobox are new content is because it just didn't sell very well and this is a way for them to make some cash with it.
If the movies were so great then why would they offer them on a site like Videobox who charges so little to download it?
I think you and I have a affinity for older porn and since most new updates at Videobox are not that then why stay. I still visit from time to time and I suspect at some point I will join again but I don't want to download crappy porn simply because it's new and flashy.
|
11-01-10 06:55pm
|
Reply
2639
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I've joined videobox a couple of times but I never stayed for very long. The first time was the best because I had access to all this amazing content which would have costed me hundreds and probably thousands or dollars if I had bought it in DVD's.
I can't say that I didn't get my moneys worth but once you downloaded what you liked then all you have left is what new content they add. This is where I find that a long term membership is not worth it. I've noticed that a great amount of the newer content is barely 5 to 10 yrs old. That might be the reason why you thinks it's blech! I know that I do. If Videobox brought older content from the 80's and early 90's then I would have a different opinion.
|
10-31-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
2640
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't mind the 100% rating because it's possible for a site to reach it. Granted if someone gives a 100% and the pro is that the site is great then
it's not really a 100% rating anyway.
|
10-30-10 12:05pm
|
Reply
2641
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I completely forgot about Michelle lay. I forgot to mention her but there is also Ginger Lynn. My problem with Ginger is that I have a hard time with her newer stuff. She was so bubbly and energetic in her youth that her looks these days make me a little sad. She looks like she's had a hard life and that tends to make it hard to jerk off to.
The amazing thing is how much nastier Julia Ann has gotten compared to when she first started in porn.
There is something about India that attracts me. I don't know what it is but I always enjoy her scenes. She has some great lesbians scenes in Girlfriends Films.
|
10-29-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
2642
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
In some ways I prefer her newer stuff than when she first started in porn. A really hot women that gives great scenes.
|
10-29-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
2643
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I hope so too because I got kind of nervous when he mentioned 3 kind of packages? I hope it's not the kind of setup where you have to join more than one package to get what you could currently get with a long term reward memebership. I guess we'll know very soon.
|
10-29-10 06:51pm
|
Comment
2644
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
10-28-10 06:52pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
2645
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I picked Julia Ann but my list is quite long. In no particlular order. Nina Hartley, Julie Ann, India Summer, Elexis Monroe, Magdelene St-Micheals,
Tany Tate, Deauxma, Rayvennes, Darryl Hannah and the list goes on.
|
10-28-10 06:40pm
|
Reply
2646
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I took biology of sexuality in college. That was an eye full.
|
10-26-10 06:11pm
|
Reply
2647
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I also think that it depends on the comment. If you visit a site and notice that the content on their preview pages can be found elsewhere for less money than that would be a good comment or if you notice that their claim of exclusivity is far from the truth and their asking price way too high for it.
|
10-24-10 10:35am
|
Reply
2648
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Is gapeland one of the new sites added?
|
10-23-10 11:42am
|
Reply
2649
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks that makes it easier for me. In that case then I would bid my time until she lets me out of the dog house, but I'd find any way to accelarate moment.
|
10-21-10 06:00pm
|
Reply
2650
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Of course you wait her out. Everyone knows that guys can wait for sex much longer than women. You just start wearing your sexy outfits to make her suffer. Sooner or later she'll beg for it....Not.
The wording of the question made choosing a little because it says that your SO made a decision out of spite. This is the definition of spite:
"a malicious, usually petty, desire to harm, annoy, frustrate, or humiliate another person; bitter ill will; malice". I don't know if you can claim there is mutual respect and love in any relationship if the other uses spite in any decision.
|
10-20-10 06:34pm
|
