| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2551
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Having seen a couple of Cher's videos then I would be inclined to say that she has no ass to speak of.
If I had to pick from the above list than Shakira wins. If I have to nominate someone then how about Tina Turner?
|
01-04-11 07:09am
|
Reply
2552
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Comment
I suspect that this is a recent change because there was a review done in September and I'm sure the reviewer would have mentioned that the site had a significant price increase. I already thought that 25$ was expensive for the content available so 35$ is just ridiculous.
|
01-02-11 04:58pm
|
Reply
2553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The term is important but you need the specs to show what the site claims to be HD content is in fact tru HD. I``m trying to incorporate that in my reviews now.
|
01-02-11 09:21am
|
Reply
2554
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
Outside is bad and it's worse in cars. Why try to film a sex scene where it's next to impossible to see any of the action?
|
01-01-11 01:06pm
|
Review
2555
|
Porn Traveling
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get to see different travel locations like Egypt, Turkey and Thailand.
-The girls are very cute and most are newbies to porn.
-These appear to all be real life porn couples on vacation.
-Videos can be downloaded in iphone 460x320, AVI 1024x576 and HD 1280x720 format.
-Videos can streamed in Flash.
Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file. |
| Cons: |
-This is basically a variation of cashforsextape but here our real life couples are on vacation so why create a new site when these could have been added to the other site.
-Still a very small site with 3 travel locations.
-Ligthing is again not very good.
-Dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitles.
-Content is not dated so impossible to know when they are updating or if theyr still do.
-Many hours of videos to download but a lot of it is not about sex as much as couples playing and talking. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is basically cashforsextape on vacation. Many of the couples on that site are on this one but this time they are in an exotic locations. The major improvement is that most of the sex is filmed by a third party so less POV shots and we can see some of the action.
-This one suffers many of the same problems that cashforsextape did. The only exception is the third party camera shots.
-If you are curious to see how porn couples interact with each other and friends on vacation then you might enjoy this site but be warned that you'll have to watch a lot of content that has nothing to do about sex. |
|
01-01-11 09:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2556
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-This truly appear to be real life porn couples that film some of their everyday stuff but where sex is still the main theme.
-All videos can streamed in Flash.
-videos can be downloaded in AVI format with standard resolution.
-Each couple has multiple videos that are shot over an undetermined period of time so you have many hours of content for each couple.
-There are 46 couples to choose from and each has many hours of video content. |
| Cons: |
-These are sex tapes of porn couples so like all other sex tapes. The videos are shot either in POV or from a tripod which means you get jerky camara shots or long shots with bad angles where you see little of the action.
-Ligthing is often bad to awful.
-There are many hours of avalaible content to download but a good chunk of it is not about them having sex since it includes some of their everyday stuff.
-Since these are porn couples then the guys are the girls real boyfriend and aren't necessarily porn performers and many of them wouldn't win any beaty conntest.
-Dialogue is all in Russian with subtitles. |
| Bottom Line: |
-There has to be a market for this kind of content because they are still updating but I honestly don't know who likes this stuff. I'm not a huge fan of POV and let alone tripod shot porn. Pierre Woodmand is one of the few that has been able to do a prety decent job of it but he's a pro who's been doing it for years. these people aren't.
-If you are curious to see who a porn girl wants to date and what their normal life is like then you might enjoy this site but be prepared for badly shot porn intermixed with a lot of non-porn related content. |
|
01-01-11 09:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2557
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
06-18-11 09:27am (Update History)
Reason: I rejoined the site and I find that their updates have slowed.
|
| Pros: |
-Acces to 5 other sites with one membership.
-All the girls are popular newbies in the porn world.
-All videos come in 3 formats: iphone 480x320,
standard AVI 1024x576, and HD MKV 1280x720.
-You can stream the videos in Flash.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Content is dated.
-You can use a download manager but are limited to only 2 and sometimes 3 downloads at a time. |
| Cons: |
-This is a very small site with only 24 videos.
-They now appear to only update with one new video every month.
-Some of the content on the other site might have limited appeal.
-Many performers have the same first name only. The people behind this site have simply added a number to their first name ie: Lena 8, Lera 5 and so forth.
-You can only download about 2 videos at a time and you cannot surf within the site or network until one of the downloads is complete. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This was a small site within a network of 5 other sites in January and at the time I gave it an 85 for potential but the network has not gotten better but worse. Most of the other sites except for pickupgilrs almost never update.
The theme of the videos are mini gangbangs with one girl and 3 guys. Anal in all of them with most getting a dp.
-The first 8 videos were all shot outside and that is consistent with content shot in the summer or early fall while the most recents are all inside and that makes sense as it is winter overthere.
-The 35$ join price may be a little too high for what you will get.
-It's hard to say if this is now a network worth joining because of the update schedule. In January I would have said yes but now it's not so clear. You should only join for what you will find on this site and the others within the network and not for what might be coming up in future updates. |
|
01-01-11 08:09am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2558
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Whoever handles her site must have thought that it's better to get 3 dollars from unsuspecting visitors then 20$ from regular members.
I read a past comment that there used to be a 3 day trial which gave you full access.
I got burned with membership to sites when I first started surfing for porn and almost all of these were for pornstar sites. My rule of thumb is that unless I can see the entire content on the previews pages then I'd rather miss an opportunity then feel cheated.
|
01-01-11 06:56am
|
Reply
2559
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
whowho's Review
I'm a past member of this network and your review hit pretty much on every point. There are actually 4 sites with leased content. The one you named and you can add hardcore youth, analyzed girls and seductive 18 to the list. It's a very expensive network but you do get a lot of content and they often have the first hardcore scenes of many girls just starting in porn.
|
01-01-11 06:45am
|
Reply
2560
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I wouldn't even know where to start with editing their content. Some of the parties are over 4hrs long. Even if you break each scene in 4 then you still have an hour of video per section. I like some of the girls but I don't think there is anything on this site that I'll download.
|
01-01-11 06:28am
|
Review
2561
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments. |
| Cons: |
-Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number, |
| Bottom Line: |
-I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.
-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.
-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.
-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them. |
|
12-31-10 10:50am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2562
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They currently have 100 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Access to 5 other sites with one membership.
-Most videos come in at least standard 1024x576 AVI and a large part also include HD 1280x720.
-Videos can be streamed in Flash.
-Many photosets can be viewed online and they can all be downloaded as a single zip file.
-You can vote on your favorite girl or video and post comments. |
| Cons: |
-The same model can appear on more than one site where she performs similar sex acts.
-Download speeds aren't bad but you can usually download a maximum of 4 videos at the same time and sometimes only 2. You cannot surf any of the sites once you havw reached your maximum number of downloads because their server will give you an error message.
-Many of the models are given a name different then what we know them under.
-The dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitle.(that might annoy some).
-As the title implies. This is a site where we are meant to believe that these everyday girls are picked up by these guys and inticed into having sex on camera.(it doesn't really work). |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a pretty good site as long as you don't care about the little scenarios and the dialogue that's in Russian. The scenarios didn't work for me because I recognized the performers and they are all pornstars.
The download speeds and the fact that you can only download a maximum of 4 videos and often only 2 videos is a little annoying. This is compounded by the fact that surfing the site and network is impossible during those periods.
-Membership gives you access to 5 other sites.
The only site that might include lease content is chickiporn and that's why I won't review it.
studentsexparties.com
cashforsextape.com
hardfucktales.com
porntraveling.com
chickiporn.com |
|
12-31-10 08:32am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It was a toss up between less and about the same. The only reason I picked less is that I'm finding that there aren't too many new sites that I want to join and many of the ones that I used to join don't look very good anymore. I could be because of the porn recession and if it is then I hope that chnages for 2011. If not then I guess I'll be able to enjoy whatever content I saved from past years.
I'm not sure if the poll question included sites that I'm a long term member. Brazzer, 21sextury are 2 sites that I've been with for a long time and I don't expect this to change.
|
12-31-10 07:36am
|
Reply
2564
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
No problem cancelling my membership. You will receive offers to rejoin them after your membership expires but that's standard for most porn site. I've never joined training of O but the content on Facial Abuse is very similar to public disgrace. The biggest difference is that I got a distinct feeling that Fa is more into hurting the girls and not necessarily in purely physical way but emotionaly as well.
|
12-28-10 05:54pm
|
Review
2565
|
Everything Butt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Their choice of models is very impressive and they have a better selection than in the past.
-All the performers appear to truly enjoy anal sex and this often involves large toys and fisting.
-They have added B/G content(it was mostly solo and G/G in the past).
-They currently have 115 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV & MP4 and both come in regular or Hi-Def.
-You can use a download manager.
-Membership to one site gives you deals for the other sites withink the kink network. |
| Cons: |
-This is still their biggest drawback and I don't expect it to change but their photosets aren't worth watching and let alone downloading.
-I'd love to see 2 updates per week but I can live with just one because of the quality.
-They have added many new models to the site and that's a welcomed change but you still find the same model doing multiple shoots or similar stauff that she might have done on other Kink sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is my favorite Kink site and the one that I make sure to visit every week to see the most recent update. Due to the cost of a membership. I usually only stay for 2 months. They offera special deal where you get 2 months for a small increase in the cost of a one month membership.
-Their selection of models is getting better each time I visit and you now have many newbies that you wouldn't necessarily expect to see on this type of site. Add the fact that they've added B/G content and people that avoided it in past because of the G/G only stuff shgould be very happy.
If you like to see girls that look like they love anal sex with a Kink twist then this is a great site. Please avoid if you prefer your vanilla style of anal sex. You won't find it here. |
|
12-27-10 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2566
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I didn't have any major problem with the download speeds at the time of my membership. Are you planning on joining them? It's one of those sites that's hard to judge from the outside. You think that some of the content will be good but once inside you find that most of it isn't very good.
I'm sure you know what they are about but in case you don't. The first thing you have to know is that no matter how cute the girl might look. They manage to almost always make them look bad. The scenes are very intense and not necessarily in a good way. There a lot of choking, puking during the BJ part of the scene and that might not be your cup of tea. I won't mention the part about the facial because that's the name of the site. I sometimes have really stupid moments in my life and this was one of them. I really don't like facials so why would I join a site who's motto is exactly that?
|
12-27-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
2567
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I look at it as a kind of joke. I`m a man, I`m in my 40`s and I like to watch dirty movies. I guess I qualify for a dirty old man...Just not that old.
|
12-27-10 07:44am
|
Reply
2568
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
It's all hardcore.
|
12-26-10 08:34pm
|
Reply
2569
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
You are a lucky guy. She's Sofia.
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/sofia_2.html
|
12-26-10 09:50am
|
Reply
2570
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I tried different section of the site and I've found her. She looks very familiar but the name escapes me. You can see that she also has a tattoo on the lower right side of her stomach. I'm not sure but I think she doesn't always wear that above nose piercing.
|
12-25-10 09:41am
|
Reply
2571
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No I haven't but then again I simply join a new site when I want to regardless of the time or year.
|
12-25-10 09:37am
|
Reply
2572
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I'm not sure if you see something diferent than me but when I visit the site then the top banner has 3 performers a dark haired girl and 2 blondes. The middle blonde with pigtails is Britney Spring:
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/britney_2.html
|
12-24-10 08:30am
|
Reply
2573
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick undecided because I'm notoriously bad at giving trust ratings. I always forget to check that option and therefore I'm sure that I've overlooked giving some of you a positive trust rating. I've rarely given a negative one but I stand by those that received it. I think that giving a trust rating for only one review and no other parcipation anywhere else is somewhat excessive but it's not such a problem that we should start preventing that option. Ifa PU memeber feels that the reviewers deserves it then that's good enough for me.
|
12-23-10 06:22am
|
Reply
2574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
It still sometimes happens but like badandy said about having to take a leak. Doing the superman is never pleasant.
|
12-21-10 06:36pm
|
Review
2575
|
Torbe Network
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-About 800 videos.
-Some exclusive content.
-You can download most videos in 4 format which include Quicktime, ipod/psp, wmv and mpg4.
-You can use a download manager.
-You can download some of the picture sets as a complte file.
-The videos are all dated.
-There is an option to search using the models name. |
| Cons: |
-Large part of the content appears to be leased and the quality is from good to poor.
-The camera work in many of the videos is not very good and the cameraman tends to zoom on the penetration for too long.
-Certain scenes have only video and no pic sets while others have only pics and no video.
-The language used in many of the videos is not English.
-Many of the videos have a strong amateurish feel to them.
-Most of the leased content little to no model info.
-Synopsis of the action in the videos is often incorrect. |
| Bottom Line: |
I haven't been lucky with my memberhsip of late beause this is another network that has really disapointed me. I thought that I could find some goo videos but out of about 800 or so videos. I have downloaded about 12 and all will be deleted from my computer. There are still quite a few videos that llok good but they don't appeal to me.
This network might appeal more to someone who's just starting to surf for porn and likes the amateur/newbie style of porn. I'd avise most older porn surfer to avoid because of the leased content. You don't want to join this site only to find out you have many of the videos. |
|
12-20-10 07:38pm
Replies (2)
|
