| Type | Site - Score | Feedback / Review | Date | 
                                    
    | Reply 51 | N/A | Reply of
                skippy's Reply 
 My sentiments as well.
 Just much better expressed than my own rambling
 thoughts..
 
 
 | 04-07-17  09:45am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 52 |   
 Mr. Skin
             (0)
 | Reply of
                LadyLover's Review 
 ... I think I joined for two months
 in 2001, back in the bronze age of porn. The site had maybe 50 photos and 20 clips over maybe two dozen pages and we were happy with that.
 
 
 | 04-01-17  04:48pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 53 |   
 Enigmatic Boys
             (0)
 | Reply of
                merc77's Review 
 From my brief visit, I'd say 80% of the videos are solos.
 Does this ring true? Solos aren't my thing, be it male or female.
 
 
 | 04-01-17  04:27pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 54 |   
 Girls Rimming
             (0)
 | Reply of
                rearadmiral's Review 
 To each his own I guess. What I, a straight male,
 badly desire is a site
 devoted to girl-on-girl or guy-on-girl rimming.
 Girl-on-guy leaves me nauseated.
 
 
 | 04-01-17  04:09pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 55 |   
 Sean Cody
             (0)
 | Reply of
                merc77's Review 
 I blame SeanCody for the brouhaha over the student. They're a well established studio yet lacked the grace to wait all of four months for him to graduate before posting.  It would of meant no news trucks at his front door, no hounding by our sexually repressed news media. Those fucks will do anything for a dollar.
 Last I heard, the lad had enlisted in the Army and had just completed basic training.
 
 
 | 12-02-16  10:15pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 56 | N/A | Reply of
                XXX Customer's Poll 
 Jeepers creepers.. I see I'm an amateur with my 34.9 gigs! Doesn't count my mirrored back-up.
 
 
 | 09-11-16  12:13pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 57 | N/A | Reply of
                Amanda's Poll 
 Informal nude beaches on numerous occasions. Nothing so elaborate as to be posted 'Beyond this point you may encounter nudity.' With a unshockable girlfriend I visited a nudist resort several times in the late '90s. Google empirehaven. We would of attended others but here in northern new york such things were/are a rarity.
 
 
 | 09-11-16  12:10pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 58 | N/A | Reply of
                LPee23's Reply 
 Yeah, they're each a 1Tb Barracuda.
 
 
 | 06-12-16  04:16pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 59 | N/A | Reply of
                pat362's Reply 
 At the time of purchase I saw no 'Wall-E has trashed better drives' comments. One or two star reviews referred only to the price vs the competitors.
 
 
 | 06-12-16  04:15pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 60 |   
 Boy Crush
             (0)
 | Reply of
                merc77's Review 
 So for some months Gay Brother has developed a near-catatonic facial expression whenever he daydreams of lean lithe Tyler Thayer. That's his latest twink obsession, whom I must admit is very easy on the eyes. But...
 A quick glance at his page shows that of his nine scenes, seven occur on the same bed, under the same harsh greyhound bus station lighting.
 
 Here's the thing: BoyCrush is a well established site, has been around  long enough to have employed 300+ models. I know people don't sign on for the furniture, but seven out of nine happens when the company is run by lick-pennys, with a jaded opinion of the customer.
 
 
 | 06-11-16  08:22pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 61 |   
 Helix Studios.net
             (0)
 | Reply of
                merc77's Review 
 Now that Staxus is streaming only, Helix is the gold standard for Twink porn.
 
 
 | 06-09-16  08:30am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 62 |   
 Mike 18
             (0)
 | Reply of
                merc77's Review 
 Thanks for the review.
 
 Mike....and its numerous satillite sites carry the strong scent of gay-for-pay, a real turn off at least for me. Costly for the number of videos offered.
 
 
 | 06-09-16  08:25am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 63 | N/A | Reply of
                Amanda's Poll 
 "I found your missing Powerball ticket!"
 
 
 | 02-20-16  09:01pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 64 |   
 Staxus
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Chainy's Comment 
 Gay brother sadly informs me Staxus is now streaming only. By his expression, you'd of thought he had been diagnosed with a terrible disease.
 
 
 | 11-05-15  09:24pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 65 | N/A | Reply of
                Vegas Ken's Poll 
 as rare as hen's teeth partly due to our saint or slut concept of female sexuality. My gut tells me all or nearly all that appears in porn is faked but i have seen this delightful event in the flesh.
 
 
 | 09-28-15  03:27am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 66 | N/A | Reply of
                careylowell's Poll 
 I considered Hustler as vulgar and P'house too soft focus. But attaining the lastest issue of Playboy was the frenzy of my youth.
 
 
 | 09-14-15  09:20am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 67 | N/A | Reply of
                Amanda's Poll 
 In pre-web days I actually drove 90 minutes to the closest, maybe twice a year for five, six years.
 
 
 | 09-07-15  07:08am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 68 | N/A | Reply of
                Khan's Poll 
 I think Vag fisting is super hot. That said, I'm glad the very first porn movie I saw didn't feature it. And anal fisting I don't ever need to see again. Ugh.
 
 
 | 04-03-15  02:29pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 69 | N/A | Reply of
                Cybertoad's Reply 
 Lincoln just a single term congressman before he was elected.
 
 
 | 04-05-14  06:55pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 70 | N/A | Reply of
                plan b's Poll 
 Now when I posted a poll as to our preferred condom of choice, I got three replies saying the poll had nothing to do with porn.
 
 
 | 05-08-13  09:47am 
 
 | 
    | Review 71 |   
 Mexican Lust
         (0)
 
 70.0
 | 
            
                | Status: | Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. |  
                | Pros: | -Models appear to be exclusive. Just my guess.
 Beautiful Latins abound. Not a guess.
 -About as raunchy a site to be found from conservative, catholic Mexico
 |  
                | Cons: | -Maritza Mendez, the site's originator and flagship  model appears in only hardcore pics not videos, a major disappointment. This home-wrecker with a staggeringly hourglass figure and bedroom eyes was my reason for signing and I am still hot under the collar as her image is thickly scattered across the preview pages. I can't be the only one who feels taken. -Top shelf women are paired with only paunchy men with length-imperiled penis.
 |  
                | Bottom Line: | With exceptions, models are of two types: Barely out of their teens, small or flat chested & open to lesbo and anal. The second batch runs late thirties to nearly fifty, usually with big boobs and ass, often wearing a mask. Worth a multi-month membership? No. Single month? Yes, for lovers of Hispanic women.
 |  
 | 02-16-13  07:22pm 
 Replies (0)
 
 | 
    | Reply 72 |   
 Club Red Light
             (0)
 | Reply of
                slategrey's Review 
 $14.95? I guess I was snookered for just under thirty clams...which is too much for a site which hadn't any HD updates for seven months. Seven at the time of my m'ship & I see the digital drought continues.
 
 
 | 12-06-11  09:40pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 73 |   
 Alain Lamas
             (0)
 | Reply of
                manholelover's Review 
 A blood relation coincidentally shares this pornographer's trade name.
 
 
 | 12-06-11  09:31pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 74 |   
 Teen Sex Movs
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Cybertoad's Reply 
 I'm 50! I recall Playboy not showing crotches (sp?). I prefer hanky-panky between similar age groups. I guess I'm pestering you with a reply only because of my shameless quest for a talk back badge.
 
 
 | 12-06-11  09:22pm 
 
 | 
    | Review 75 |   
 Teen Sex Movs
         (0)
 
 88.0
 | 
            
                | Status: | Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. |  
                | Pros: | -Just one Andrew Jackson a month with PU discount -Few of the tattoos & fake tits now obligatory of mainstream US porn starlets.
 -Young women banged by young men, not men old enough to pass as their dads.
 -Site nav is simple, clean.
 -A host of fresh faces.
 -I don't recall any music. Hallelujah!
 |  
                | Cons: | -Locations are stiflingly provincial, filmed at various somnolent hamlets in Eastern Europe. Adrift in a perpetual economic gloaming, the lads and lasses drinking bathtub liquor from their best, least chipped glasses. All but three or four women appear in jeans & sneakers. -Many scenes are shot without much technical finesse. Dialing the camera's ISO to 1600 won't compensate for the lack of proper lighting.
 |  
                | Bottom Line: | My sole reason for membership was to see sexual hanky-panky between young people of similar ages. Here, TeenSexMovs succeeds with roughly two-thirds  of the action. Am I the only voyeur officially freaked out by mainstream porn's zillion scenes of 20 yr old girls pounded by 45 yr old men? Does the PU membership know of similar sites? Write in as immortality awaits!
 The apparent lack of anyone else in the room besides the performers and the cameraman lends an air of spontaneity.
 Rawness of production values wears after 20 or 30 scenes. They don't own a tripod or more than one lens. Blankets are nailed to walls for backdrops. My guess: the closest the cameramen came to formal training was the day they drove past the front door to the Prague Institute of  Cinematography. They didn't stop.
 |  
 | 11-18-11  10:54am 
 Replies (3)
 
 |