| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1026
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Ditto. The site is sliding downhill and I've had it with the lousy search engine, the silly babble by the camera guy and the garbage footage that sometimes fills over 1/2 of a scene.
There are too many other great sites out there that this one is easy to quit. And I did.
I'll be writing a review shortly and haven't decided on a score yet, but it will definitely bring the average down a notch or two.
|
03-18-09 11:15pm
|
Reply
1027
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
One last point I forgot in my comments.
The most frequent model appearing on the site as listed in the index is shown as: Actors: eeehh... I forgot.
The problem is that, without identification even the most gorgeous babes are totally lost in the huge number of videos. One not uncommon example is a babe called Misty Mae, a young chick with a very nice set of naturals with huge, pancake sized, areolae. I downloaded her video when it appeared in an update but was unable to find out if she has any other stuff on BB.
|
02-26-09 02:00pm
|
Reply
1028
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
84 is a fair score. I have been a BB member off and on over the last several years. In comparison to RA and Brazzers, they haven't done well to keep pace, in particular with their search function (it sucks). (Ask for Carmella Bing and you will get some Carmella Bing along with others who are not Carmella Bing such as Riley Evans.)
And in far too many cases their identifications are misspelled or just plain inaccurate.
Their videos frequently have far too much crap in them that make them unnecessarily large (in far too many cases it takes over 5 minutes just to get to the part where the female finally arrives, then too much chatter before we get to the good stuff.
Navigation needs upgrading. Way too many clicks just to get to the point to download a video.
That said, I'm OK with the 84 score because of TrashMan's "Pro's." BB is still producing lots of very good stuff and is still a good site. But NA and Brazzers are better.
BTW, their tit classification - Real/Fake - is not totally accurate. Some babes have videos made both before and after the aftermarket enhancements were installed so a new category, "Both" is needed. Other babes have tits that have clearly been subjected to some work by a Beverly Hills surgeon but are still listed as real.
|
02-26-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
1029
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
gamblinman's Comment
Candidly, I lost interest in BangBros when they pulled a price bait & switch, but mine was a promised discount listed on PU that billed at the full rate. Their response to my email complaining about it simply said that the discount wasn't authorized and that they had no idea who Porn Users is.
I had been a member for a few months a few years ago and was OK but was not motivated to continue my membership. They've got some babes in exclusive videos that, at the phantom discount, would have kept me on as a member for several months.
I really don't understand the logic in a site being belligerent with its customers. It's rare, fortunately.
|
10-15-08 10:15pm
|
Reply
1030
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Dawn123's Reply
Bottom line, I've taken advantage of several TBP/PU discount offers and all, except Bang Bros, have been honored as offered and all of them were really good deals.
And the folks at TBP/PU immediately pulled the offer as soon as I reported it.
Finally, BangBros belatedly extended my full price membership to make up for the matter.
So I lost nothing except a few minutes of time posting these messages. I suggest staying on top of any deals and squawking immediately if you run into any snags.
|
06-11-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1031
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DrKnockers's Reply
Nothing at all.
On 6 April, I used the TBP link to Bang Bros. The sign-up screen showed the $14.95 "special discount" price, so I signed up and started surfing their site. At no time did Bang Bros. advise me that the price I would be charged would be $23.95.
On 9 April, when I checked my Master Card account on line I saw that the charge came in at $23.95. That's when I communicated with Bang Bros. who denied any knowledge at all of the discount and of TBP. They refused to honor the discount.
Then on 9 April I sent an eMail to Khan, (PornUsers.com Sr Admin) which he quickly acknowledged receiving, but I have heard nothing back from him over the past week.
What concerns me is the credibility of TBP's discounts. There's really no way to determine their authenticity until the actual charge appears on a credit card and there's no way to cancel the charge once it has been made. It suggests that you should probably be willing to accept the full subscription price if the advertised TBP price is not honored by a site. And if the full price is too much, simply ignore the offer.
In fairness, I've successfully used the TBP discount on other occasions so I suspect this is a Bang Bros. issue, not a TBP issue. But not having heard anything from Khan other than the acknowledgment, I can add nothing to my initial comments.
EDIT: I see that Khan posted an update today. However my suggestion still stands. If TBP offers a discount and the site does not honor it (as was the case with Bang Bros.) there's nothing that can be done after the fact except to accept the full charge. So it looks like TBP discounts should be viewed as possibilities, not promises.
|
04-16-08 11:22am
|
Comment
1032
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
|
04-09-08 12:35pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1033
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
What it means is that it makes no difference who pays for something...it's paid for and thus the user is entitled to use it without restrictions.
You get high speed from your school because it's paid for and you're entitled to use it. So why the criticism by others of your source? It's not relevant.
Bottom line, your beef, as is mine, is that Bang Bros operates it's downloads at a very slow speed.
|
04-06-08 02:23pm
|
Reply
1034
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
BadAndy's point is the speed, or lack thereof, of the downloads, and he has a legitimate issue. But the focus was changed to how he accesses the web.
If my company sends me to Europe from Los Angeles and pays Business Class air fare on my behalf, is it wrong for me to complain about being assigned a middle seat in a sold out coach section just because it's my company that is paying my fare? Of course not.
The same applies to BadAndy. His beef is with download speed.
And yes, BangBros has a terribly slow download speed for their otherwise excellent site.
|
04-06-08 07:41am
|
Reply
1035
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I am getting a follow-up at least once a week but they offer no incentive to re-join (such as a discount price or an extra week or two) so it serves only to irritate, not attract return business.
I liked the site when I was a member, then canceled when I was expecting to be off-line for about a month. I planned to rejoin shortly after I returned but kept putting it off...then the weekly "we want you back" stuff started to show up. When I saw a review of Brazzers, I decided to give that site a try before going back to Bang Bros. Love Brazzers so I'm still holding out on Bang Bros.
|
04-03-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
1036
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Most (all?) of Bang Brothers content downloads in 3 parts. A trial subscription gets you only the first scene which is frequently a teaser, sometimes no nudity at all, and never any hard core. The strategy is a bit dumb, in my opinion, because they should want to convert the sampler folks into full subscriptions. Happy campers are more likely to spring for a quarter benjamin than guys who are pissed off with the skimpy trial.
|
05-24-07 06:20pm
|
Reply
1037
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Boy is that true!
But better yet, I liked the articulate and fact loaded commentary. Much better than the "your site sucks" crap that is often posted.
|
07-13-09 08:32am
|
Reply
1038
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
longjohn351's Reply
This is another example of why PU is so great. Thanks longjohn for escalating the issue and JamesDavid for adjusting the download limit. It's a win for the website.
|
08-28-14 12:17pm
|
Reply
1039
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
C'est une bella nuit. So, for what it's worth, I'm done.
|
08-26-14 09:46pm
|
Reply
1040
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
Suggest you go back and read LongJohn's original post. He wrote two emails to you with no reply before he went public.
The lack of respect you show to him for his apparent violation of your TOS by ignoring his private emails to you followed by a big time rant about his attempt to rip your content is totally amazing.
|
08-26-14 05:40pm
|
Reply
1041
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
MMMMM, Okay back.
Thanks for your response. It removes any doubt that might have existed about how you feel about your customers. At least you're upfront and direct which permits other potential subscribers to know what to expect.
Have a great day.
|
08-26-14 11:37am
|
Reply
1042
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
What a nice and gentle reply.
Clearly as one of a team of two, your hands are full. Yet you had plenty of time to write this public diatribe to scold Longjohn but you had no time to respond to his private communications to you in a private response.
I can only assume that you were using this opportunity to let any who may even think about crossing your lines in the sand that they will surely be punished publicly regardless of circumstances. I'm sure you'll always take the position that the customer is always wrong.
One thing is certain, you won't have me signing up so you won't need to worry about whether I will violate your TOS. I make it a practice to sign up with sites that are happy to have me as a customer and will try to keep me as a customer for the long term.
|
08-25-14 10:21pm
|
Reply
1043
|
Big Tit Hooker
(0)
|
Reply of
Fat Tony's Review
Has something changed?
James reported in a comment last month that the site was not updating; just recycling the same 30 scenes.
|
08-28-10 12:08pm
|
Comment
1044
|
Big Tits
(0)
|
|
07-17-11 12:21am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1045
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm OK with the "...at School" gambit.
I enjoy the fantasy because I had a few real foxy teachers when I was still learning how to wank my shank.
And that may be why I love watching babes who can wear plaid skirts and loose blouses getting paid to be laid.
|
02-15-10 09:38am
|
Reply
1046
|
Big Tits At Work
(0)
|
Reply of
oxymoron's Review
I agree with the score of 80. My reason is that the babes on that site must have depleted the world's stockpile of silicone.
I favor natural titties but I am also turned on by aftermarket enhancements that are done well and improve the natural look of the boob.
But this site seems to use models with excessive implants that make the babes look more like blow-up dolls than real sexy ladies.
|
11-19-09 11:04am
|
Reply
1047
|
Big Tits In Sports
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
The network is BRAZZERS.
They did post a notice on the home page of Brazzers about the new site, which currently has 12 videos with sports themes.
|
09-26-08 01:35pm
|
Reply
1048
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
I just joined OxPass based on meember comments on this site and am still getting used to it. It's got a messy navigation process that takes a while to understand.
But one thing seems to me to be apparent and that is the more recent videos are far sharper and better than the older ones on all of the network sites.
The best part so far is that every video I've run has been original material and almost all have made my woody come to attention. Better yet they have fun and don't take their profession too seriously. And that's a good thing.
|
07-27-07 11:42am
|
Review
1049
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.
The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.
The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).
There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.
The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).
Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples |
| Cons: |
Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.
Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.
The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.
I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material. |
| Bottom Line: |
The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.
Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.
In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.
The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.
In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.
The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.
I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.
My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.
Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.
Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.
One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up. |
|
10-06-14 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1050
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I would say the ratio is about 60% bared boobs and 50% bared pussy. The bikinis usually come off altogether.
There's self touching but no insertions or hard core.
|
09-20-14 04:59pm
|
