| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Review
Excellent review.
Your score doesn't match what I'll score it when I've finished my review, but you did an excellent job of explaining why you scored it as you did which, if always done the way you did, adds a lot to the value of P. U. reviews.
I, personally, like a variety of insertions, because that means the girl is enjoying herself, showing off her body and giving me a good opportunity to enjoy looking at her private parts.
While fornication is also fun to watch, seeing a hairy male asshole staring back at me while his sausage is doing its thing in the babe's vagina or butt hole, does nothing at all for me.
That said, each of us has our individual preferences. I really am turned off by excessive and/or poorly located tattoos (example, a lousily oriented script "F" on Friday's lower groin area). I just cannot watch a porn vid with excessive tat's for more than a minute. But some people love tat's.
Your experience with ALS Scans matches mine for an all tattoo site I wasted my money on. The site had good PU reviews and a high average score but it took me about an hour after signing up to put through the cancellation.
It's all about what floats your boat and when people post good descriptive reviews like yours, it really helps the decision process.
|
06-09-08 11:23am
|
Reply
977
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Interesting bit of trivia.
The babe identified on FTV Girls as Danielle is a big natural breasted woman with a really great personality. Love those boobies. But as you may know, FTV has no hardcore and because Rob at FTV is setting up a new site for Danielle, I'm assuming that she's under contract with FTV.
But in doing a web surf for Danielle, I found her on a teaser clip for this site, Amateur Allure, where she's giving this guy Thomas a juicy head job and taking his schlong in some vaginal sex. Not at all like the sweet virginal sex bomb that she is on FTV Girls.
Because I love this babe, and because your review gives the site high marks for the quality of the talent, I'll be forking over the ridiculously high fee of 1/3 of a C Note for a month's membership.
|
09-27-08 05:53pm
|
Reply
978
|
Amateur Emo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Nathan1000's Review
The preview site pretty much confirms that the word "Amateur" in the site's name applies to the site more than the well worn professional models in their splash page.
Thanks, Nathan, for confirming that this site isn't worth a minute of my time.
|
02-14-10 09:05am
|
Reply
979
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I understand the search feature aspect and I wish sites other than VB and American Vice used it.
But my beef with VB is that they are very sloppy in identifying the talent. They frequently misspell a name, thus leaving it out of the search, or they just post a scene with no names of the talent at all, thus making the scene a "lost scene" for all intents and purposes.
Hopefully those negative aspects were not carried over from American Vice.
|
01-13-09 07:52am
|
Review
980
|
Angelica Costello
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
There are some photos of Venus Knight (aka Angelica Costello)
There are some photos of Venus Knight
There are some photos of Venus Knight
At least there is no scam billing. They take your money and then they take off.
That's all the Pro's I can come up with. Seriously |
| Cons: |
Dead site with no activity.
No customer support at all
Very sloppy navigation
Hardly any content
What's there is lousy quality |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line, forget this site.
I signed up because they sent me an email that offered a 2 month non-recurring at $19.99. Being a Venus Knight fan, BIG TIME, I figured that was a great deal although PU/TBP had no G2 at all about the site.
As soon as I accessed the site for the first time I went to work to find stuff about Venus. It took a while but I finally found a few photos, No videos, just photos.
Having committed my money I thought I'd see what else was there. Yes there was some low quality stuff but none of it was worth previewing, let alone downloading.
When you consider that you can get a ton more material on Venus Knight on Twistys for the same investment, you will conclude this site is a waste of time and money.
To give you some idea how bad it is, I'm as tight as they come when it's my money, so when I sign up for a site, I drain as much as I want as quickly as possible so I can cancel and move on within the first month. In this case, after day one when I determined what a crap site it was, I don't think I revisited it more that 3 or 4 times and that was just to see if I missed something the first time or if the webmaster woke up and worked on it.
Why a score of 51 and not 50? Remember, I'm a Venus Knight fan and there were a few photos of Venus Knight that I did not have nestled away on my harddrive.
That's it. |
|
06-02-08 07:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
981
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
snappy's Reply
Case closed. I've dealt with other sites like this over the years where the webmaster is paranoid and/or overly controlling. I've learned to get out ASAP and move on to genuine quality sites that have reasonable policies and practices. There's so much great stuff out there, there's no reason whatever to put up with this crap.
Even if this site gets with it and treats its customers right, I have no interest.
|
05-30-11 11:17pm
|
Reply
982
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Allen Funt's Comment
The site now makes a big deal about the download feature, but is now $25 per month.
I would be very interested in whether any PU's are current members who can give us an update.
|
05-15-11 02:43pm
|
Comment
983
|
Ariel Jordan
(0)
|
|
06-30-08 07:18am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
984
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
joekerr1:
This network of sites renames some of their girls for reasons I know not. However, the network hosts this FREE site: http://www.indexxxed.com which summarizes a lot of things including on which of its 10 sites a specific girl appears.
I'm still waiting for these guys to offer a multi-site access package of some kind. The previews are terrific and they seem to do a great job finding the right babes to do their thing.
Good review. Thanks.
|
06-02-08 08:57am
|
Reply
985
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
The $29.95 problem arose after I checked out the tour extensively, and with interruptions, so it's very possible that I created a cookies conflict that caused the higher price to appear.
I just tried again and it looks like it was me and not the site because the price now shows consistently as $24.95.
So my apologies to any who were put off by my comment.
|
03-31-09 01:08pm
|
Comment
986
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
|
03-29-09 06:19pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
987
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
Any update on how things ultimately worked out?
I really like it when a webmaster takes the time to read and respond to a PU post and would like to know if Advent was successful in keeping you back on the site as a long term member.
|
10-19-10 09:13am
|
Reply
988
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Nicely written review! I really like your narrative style.
I spent just a few minutes checking out the site and see what you mean. The teaser video is into female degradation and will make misogynous guys, but few others, happy.
A shame, because Aussie babes are super hot and less reserved on average than their American counterparts.
|
10-12-14 09:19am
|
Reply
989
|
AV9898
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow, you guys are fast!
|
10-16-08 09:51am
|
Reply
990
|
AV9898
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
This is what appears in the TBP review:
Monthly: $9.95 (recurs at $29.95/mo.)
1 Year: $99.50 (non-recurring
|
10-16-08 07:02am
|
Reply
991
|
Babe Ink
(0)
|
Reply of
TinaMaria's Reply
Sorry TinaMaria, nothing personal intended.
I was responding to the original review in which no mention of the tattoo theme was made. And yes, it IS my opinion, which is what this comment section is intended to be used for.
For those who are into tattoos, this site is good. If the original review referred to the fact that it was a tattoo theme, I would not have made any comment at all.
|
01-22-07 06:24pm
|
Comment
992
|
Babe Ink
(0)
|
|
01-19-07 03:45pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
993
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
I was a member of SexyBabes for several years and got Babelicious when it was introduced. I'm a video guy and, because SexyBabes had a long history of excellent video offerings, I stuck with it until I finally gave up waiting for the quality to return to both SexyBabes and Babelicious.
I'm very happy to see your post mainly because I'd love to see your sites return to their original glory. Please keep us up to date on how it goes. I'm ready to rejoin when you tell me things are back to your original standard.
|
01-04-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
994
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment
I agree about natural sounds being audible. If there are no natural sounds, I'm fine with a bird chirping in the background or something like that just to make sure my speakers are operative.
I like music where the girl is dancing in the video but the music must be part of the content and not just dubbed in. Out of synch music is totally not good.
|
04-03-08 11:36am
|
Rating
995
|
Babelicious
(0)
94.0
|
No Review.
|
09-19-07 07:28am
|
Reply
996
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
OK. So I thought I'd check out Babes.com and I read both the TBP review and Toad's review. That's when I discovered that the company owned Brazzers, Reality Kings and Twistys.
I dropped Twistys after 5 continuous years when their site turned south earlier this year. I also have been a Brazzers member off and on, and in one memorable lapse in judgment, I joined the Reality Kings site.
Brazzers could easily promote itself as the king of lousy silicone jobs and RK as the roach motel of porn (remember the old roach motel ad..."You can check in but you cannot check out.")
Toad's observations about their billing and business practices tell me that this company is one I can definitely live without, especially with all the other sites with outstanding customer service and with terrific content. (DDF, VideoBox, Perfect Gonzo and ALS Scans come immediately to mind as superior in both service and content.)
|
10-30-14 10:39am
|
Reply
997
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
This was a premium site way back when I first became an online porn user, Videos were not so hot (but back then the technology wasn't there). The photos were wonderful.
Sorry to see how they've become another POS site that sounds like they just don't give a damn.
Thanks for the great detail in your review.
|
08-05-14 01:46pm
|
Reply
998
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thanks for a great review. The Babes site was one of the very first sites I joined and it was good (not great) at the time.
Your comparison, for example, to Met Art is perfect as a reason why Babes goes off my short term join list. I like the technical excellence of Met Art but I literally fell asleep watching one of their videos last year when I was still a member (boring video, but a sip of Glenlivit scotch contributed to my drowsiness. I don't think I've ever dozed off watching a porn video.
I've evaluated the "lifetime" deal and did the match as you did. Unless you stay a member of a site for an extended period it's not a deal by any stretch of the imagination.
|
06-14-14 05:46pm
|
Reply
999
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I signed up twice quite a while back (2006 and 2005) and both times I was denied access a day or two into the membership. In both cases the "don't really care" attitude was apparent because I couldn't get any reply at all for several days from the support people. And when I finally did, the reset password didn't work.
In both cases, I got a full refund of my membership fee so I have no beef about that, but I have stayed away from that site ever since. Interestingly I've been a long term and satisfied member of their Sexy-=Babes.tv site (with several other sites attached) and have had no trouble at all.
I may give it another try because I do like the stuff on their other site and there appears to be a level of satisfaction expressed by everyone.
|
02-17-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
1000
|
Baby Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
gprime's Review
About 18 months ago I signed up for the trial on this site and got hit with the limits to access, but still was interested enough to sign up for a month. It was a decent site with some good quality stuff but the assortment was skimpy and there was no free access to other sites...just heavy upsell efforts.
Based on your review I plan to sign up now to see the improvements you mentioned.
Thanks
|
02-12-07 08:26pm
|
