| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1576
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Actually this question has been on my mind all day (shows you how little I have on my mind since the football season is over) I do have a method to my timing. If I'm signing up normally for a month with a 25/75 chance (25% chance I'll let it auto-renew - 75% chance I'll cancel a week or so in) I'll time it so that the end date of the subscription is a Monday so I can get 5 weekends of membership. And I'll never sign up in February because a month membership will be date to date so it's only 28 or 29 days instead of 31 in the membership.
Aren't you sorry they asked? ;o)
|
02-17-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
1577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree completely, but that was the only reason I could see other than they just ran out of poll questions.
|
02-17-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
1578
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I suspect the webmasters might be interested. There was a recent case where one of our fellow members reported a pricing glitch ($5 too low) that the webmaster instantly fixed. If the error is made during a slow enrollment period (such as weekend days) their loss is insignificant.
|
02-17-08 08:42am
|
Reply
1579
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Danni's Hot Box had very well produced FREE live shows with chat room interaction using multiple high res cameras. Because they had to deal with the traditionally unpunctual porn whores, they frequently had late starts and unhappy participation by paying menbers. (I quit the site for other reasons, so I don't know if those sessions are still there.)
|
02-15-08 07:08am
|
Reply
1580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Model Name>Website>Variable title/name
I also have specialized filing for sites (like FTV, Amateur, etc.) that just use phony first names.
I also keep an Excel spreadsheet with thumbnail photos and comments* and with links to the files to make it easy to find the babe/content that will do it for me.
*Big naturals, great face, large labia, etc.
|
02-07-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
1581
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I understand the urge to purge is a major problem when a babe takes it up the shitter.
Nothing can shut down a magic moment any faster than a turd showing up at a very inopportune moment.
The sensation to some women may be positive, but I think it's really a creation of something to add a little variety to a normal vaginal fuck.
As a porn lover, the best part of an anal fuck is that the RCG position shows off the porn whore's cunt in all its glory with no schlong in the way.
|
02-01-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
1582
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Agree. The face is a part of the package. Gotta see the eyes, the lips, the hair, the expressions, etc.
The good news is that the hidden face is a rapidly disappearing phenomenon that started with some low end porn videos in the 1980's.
I suspect the market place has spoken because I don't recall seeing any hidden face stuff in a long time.
|
01-31-08 07:28am
|
Reply
1583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Frankly I skip past all that "what's your name?" "When did you first have sex?" and "How long have you been in the business" nonsense unless the babe is bare-assed naked and is showing off her assets while she's talking.
Foul language makes no sense to me because it expresses nothing of any value other than to show that the porn whore knows the terminology.
Repeating stuff too frequently, what ever the word (or noise) makes me turn off the speakers and go for just the babe and the sex.
|
01-27-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
1584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I agree with the general trend of replies; that I go to paysites almost exclusively. The free sites are not that good and there are plenty of paysites that have good pricing (there's a recent trend nowdays where the successful sites have discovered that there is a lot more money to be made at a slightly lower price than by keeping the price high.)
|
01-27-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
1585
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
never's Review
I went to the site. There was no 3 day trial option, just the TBP $5 discount, so I assume that was available 5 months ago when you joined, but not now.
|
01-06-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
1586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Not enough options. I like 'em starting with sexy clothing and stripping down to the level where PTA* are fully exposed so we can see the action without any camouflage. I get really pissed when a babe with great tits leaves her bra on throughout or when the panties are pulled aside but not removed. Stockings or no stockings, who cares?
By the way, when a chunky lass like Brandy Talore (aka Brandy Taylor) wears something around her waist/belly, that's fine. I like watching her bouncing titties, not her bouncing belly.
* PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
01-06-08 06:42pm
|
Reply
1587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think Jay G has nailed it. Three ratings makes the most sense.
Quantity:
I have gone to a great looking site at a good price to find that I can download everything on it in a week or so. Relatedly, I've gone to high rated sites that have infrequent updating, or none at all. A quantity rating makes great sense.
Quality:
A rating of quality that is not influenced at all by price or quantity adds considerably to the value of the rating.
Price:
Stating the price is good, but the TBP folks have seen everything so they can add a price/value subjective rating to the mix. If it's independent from the content rating, than it's a big addition to the review.
|
12-30-07 08:38am
|
Reply
1588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I voted yes.
A site should be judged solely on its merits and not its price. The reader of a review can quickly decide if a price is too high based on his own cost considerations.
If a $59.95 per month site is totally spectacular and is loaded with a bunch of gangbuster features, why should that site not get a score near 100 despite the fact that it is expensive?
Let me make that call. I just want to know what's good and what's not so good. That's all.
|
12-29-07 10:19am
|
Reply
1589
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I agree 100%.
And would I like porn as a gift? Yes, if it was something I haven't been able to locate; such as the original Taxi Girls where Nancy Suiter's fisting scene hasn't been edited out or any of Candy Barr's old "smoker" movies (black & white, of course)
Otherwise, no. If it's something the donor knows I really would like, I probably already have it.
Now a one year gift membership to a website or two that I really like...that would be just great.
|
12-23-07 09:33am
|
Reply
1590
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Whatever floats your boat! I'm not into feet/toe/finger/dildo sucking because, frankly, I'm interested in PTA and feet/toe/finger/dildo sucking wastes valuable PTA viewing time.
But for those who prefer feet/toe/finger/dildo sucking, go for it and enjoy yourself.
What's PTA you ask? It's Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
12-19-07 11:40am
|
Reply
1591
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
18 and over - an option not available. At 14-15, porn suggests that society accepts non-marital sex as normal at a point when hormones are about to rage. 16 and 17 (HS junior/senior) is probably OK because they'll see it anyway, and it well might promote some open communication with dad at that point.
|
12-17-07 06:13pm
|
Reply
1592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have a basic problem with anonymous trust ratings. Why are they permitted, even for positives?
That said, I fully agree with the requirement that all trust ratings, positive or negative, have a comment.
|
12-07-07 10:54pm
|
Reply
1593
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
With my honey it's mish...I love looking at her eyes and face while we're doing it.
With porn, however, I love watching the babes body and body parts in action and don't have any interest in the pon stud at all, so reverse gowgirl is, by far, the best position for porn.
|
12-05-07 08:16am
|
Reply
1594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Uhhhhh, size of what? My wallet? You Hellbetcha that every girl I've run into cares a whole Hell of a lot about size.
|
12-03-07 05:30pm
|
Reply
1595
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
Seg Pay 4 or so years ago - tried unsuccessfully to cancel and was billed for another month. Protested thru my M/C issuer and lost on month 1 but won on month 2.
If I see Seg Pay, I won't sign up.
Had nothing but superb experiences with CC Bill and PayCom. Never, ever had any hassle with them on any issues.
There was another back in 2002 or 2003 that was a nightmare to deal with but they are not mentioned in the list. I suspect they are out of biz.
|
11-30-07 05:38pm
|
Reply
1596
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I'm into fishnet dresses where nipples on large breasts stand out.
I'm also into thongs that are pulled up into the labia (aka, "Cameltoe") and/or worn backward. In other words, I'm drawn into well shaped attractive ladies where the garment accentuates the beauty of her points of interest.
Finally, I love to see long, shapely legs that taper up to a gorgeous vagina and further north a nicely shaped D Cup.
Jeesh, answering this question is making me horny as Hell. (Nope, doesn't take much, I admit.)
|
11-27-07 10:33am
|
Reply
1597
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
SegPay!
Thanks Denner for bringing that name up. It was one of the two that I had cancellation issues with back in 2003 or 2004. I remember them because of the strange name that still makes no sense to me.
asmith12 - that was one of the two. I haven't seen the name come up at all recently. Must be either because I look only at good sites these days (compared to 2003 before I found TBP), because they've defrauded themselves out of business or because I've just not bumped into them again.
Anyway one down, one to go.
|
11-26-07 05:20pm
|
Reply
1598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Sorry, but no I can't remember. It was three or four years ago and they both occurred within two months of each other. Both were "flaky" sites that were trash and the processors had strange names. I'm sure I'd recognize the names if they popped up again so if they do I'll say something.
|
11-26-07 03:38am
|
Reply
1599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Poll
I use a credit card, but for protection, I use a card where I've asked the credit card issuer to set a very low credit limit ($80.00) and I monitor all activity daily and on line. That way I can easily charge the going price for a site but if the number is compromised within the site or the biller, I'll know immediately as will the credit card issuer who will block any excessive sudden use. I pay each charge as it appears on the account so the running balance is usually zero.
This technique has nabbed two "unscrupulous" sites that rebilled after I cancelled a subscription (it was not ccBill, by the way) and one case where an attempt was thwarted to use the card account to pay for an auto repair in St. Louis (I live in LA).
The added benefit is that online porn is the only purchase I make with that card so the statements give me both a running history of activity and the 800 number to call if a problem arises.
|
11-25-07 02:02pm
|
Reply
1600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Frankly I don't understand the appeal. I guess basic vaginal sex is
"so 20th century" that the porn producers figured that they had to come up with something new and different.
A2M is totally unappealing to me but to each his/her own. (My reply is "don't like it much.")
|
11-23-07 08:16am
|
