| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I agree with all the foregoing comments. But I have to add that the aftermarket installations are getting better and better.
I saw one gorgeous babe whose C boobs were just fantastic and were moving beautifully during the reverse cowgirl. There was no way these beauties were fake.
So I went to work on a web search for more of her stuff. I found some that was pre-enhancement that blew me away. Unless she "blossomed" more than any other babe ever did after she turned 18, my kudos to the surgeon who did the installation. No scars and no strange shape at all.
Bottom line, if I can't tell they're fake, then I love 'em. But if they are visibly fake, Big Dick returns to being Little Richard very quickly.
BTW, one babe with aftermarkets who was a turn on for me is Carmella Bing. She claims they're all natural but I have my sincere doubts. Lately, though, she's added some additional poundage around her waist that now makes her look a bit too dumpy.
|
08-14-09 08:08am
|
Reply
1127
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm still in the site, but not by choice. The damned thing renewed me at their ridiculously high rate.
I spent some time last night trying to fight my way through the "garbage dump" structure, as you so aptly called it, to see if I was missing something that would help identify the babes and/or the scene. No luck but I did stumble on one video that was barely average in quality but was a great performance by one of my faves. But I'll be damned if I can find it again today.
My bottom line is that this site needs adult supervision and a user friendly structure.
There are so many site that are cheaper and much better out there I see no reason to remain a member and will keep trying to cancel my mambership.
|
08-14-09 07:56am
|
Reply
1128
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.
I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.
*Round tuit=when I get around to it.
|
08-13-09 09:01am
|
Comment
1129
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
|
08-09-09 07:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's News
Sounds great. But the sites say "one time." Does that mean if I sign up now I will have to sign up again in Sept at the regular rate per site?
|
08-09-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
1131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
The location is not important to me. What is important is good lighting, a straight horndog kind of guy behind the camera who understands what we porn users really want to see, and a stunt cock who understands that we are more interested in a babe's PTA* than in his body so he finds positions that help us check out all the important body parts.
One good example of the kind of lighting, camera work and unobtrusive stunt cocks is the Busty Adventures website.
BTW, they normally use a living room setting because a couch provides better viewing angles and variety, but also do some good dtuff in kitchens, dining rooms, and occasionally outdoors. I can't say I recall ever seeing a scene shot in a bedroom.
*PTA=Pussy, Tits, Ass.
|
08-08-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Occasionally I'll take one for the PU team, but I have yet to find a great (or even a moderately good) site that hasn't been reviewed on TBP or PU.
What I do now when I discover a site that isn't on TBP or PU is send an email to Khan with the site's URL so it can be added to his project list.
|
07-31-09 08:48am
|
Reply
1133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that except that well produced softcore videos can really get my motor going as well. Generally, most photos no longer get my interest except when they are of my A list babes and are taken by a true pro.
|
07-29-09 10:19pm
|
Reply
1134
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Now that's a term I can understand. Brazzer tits are, by and large, enhanced with aftermarket adjustments by Dr. Gene and are becoming a total turn-off.
Naturals are best, by far.
When I was a Score member a few years back when the quality was lousy and the DRM was in force, at least the models were mostly (not always) natural.
And as James says, there were some "thick" ones in there with very large naturals bouncing on their very large bellies, but that's just fine. The assortment was good back then but the price and the HD have me interested; very interested.
Great review James. Thanks.
|
07-26-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
1135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
PU first, then TBP if I need more info or if the scores are significantly different.
|
07-21-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
1136
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Boy is that true!
But better yet, I liked the articulate and fact loaded commentary. Much better than the "your site sucks" crap that is often posted.
|
07-13-09 08:32am
|
Reply
1137
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Reply
Got it. A more subtle form of overpromise. I have visited a few topless beaches in Europe and would have loved to been able to shoot some video without being conspicuous, so this kind of site is right up my alley. Great definition and great bods in the preview site.
This site is what I call a "once and done" site where a short (one month) membership should be timed so that I can drain as much as I can of the good stuff to my hard drive, then sit back and wait a year or so for another grab and run.
Thanks for the review. I was not aware sites like this existed, so they may get $25 of my porn budget shortly.
|
07-13-09 08:27am
|
Reply
1138
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
You said "updates are too small/rare." The preview site says at least 5 updates per week.
Is this another case of a site overpromising and under delivering?
|
07-12-09 11:16pm
|
Reply
1139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Make me feel like a real old fart but yes, I had a friend who could get his hands on some "smokers" as they were then called, with stars like Bettie Page and Candy Barr.
With the thousands of girls now doing porn there still isn't anyone that comes close to either one of those two for basic, unadulterated beauty.
And "soundless." They weren't soundless. The projectors were always rather noisy. But yes, there was no soundtrack.
|
07-11-09 10:15am
|
Reply
1140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If my memory is accurate the first site I joined was SexyBabes.tv many years ago. I'm still a member although my tastes have migrated to video from photos with the advent of HD and the ability to download scenes as long as 1 hour in a single bite.
Candidly I've thought about dropping the site but with the addition of Babelicious to their lineup, while I don't get nearly as much material as I do with, say, Twistys, what they have is still very high quality.
The other end of the spectrum is Danni.com which I joined in 03 or 04 and loved it. The negative was their DRM, which they said would not stop me from creating my own stash on DVD discs that would still be viewable after I dropped my membership(they lied). But as long as I stayed a member and was on line I could acquire the requisite license.
Then when Danny Ashe sold it, the customer service and content slipped badly and their business practices started getting a bit sleazy. I quit the site, then tried a test month in 2006 only to find that it had remained rather bad,,,and still with the lousy DRM.
Haven't been back since and doubt that I ever will go back.
|
07-09-09 08:17am
|
Reply
1141
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
The clean shaven aspect doesn't bother me that much but the absence of any heavier eroticism, such as finger insertions and/or labia play reduces the appeal of this site.
That said, perhaps it's me but it seems like the models are getting more busty, are doing a lot more leg spreading than before and are, on average, prettier than in past years.
And I wish they would do something to make their videos watchable. They are usually videos of photo shoot sessions which are not nearly as interesting as the stills.
|
07-08-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
1142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
Nope. If it's not illegal, it's just not right. I'll let people look at my stuff with me, but I won't make a copy.
|
07-08-09 09:19am
|
Reply
1143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I joined a Jana Jordan site (Jana Rocks) because she rocks my sox. It was not promoted as a non nude site but it turns out that it was and it is a total POS site.
But I'm into the nude female body so a site with tease before nudity is OK...but a site with no nudity might as well be a G rated tv show.
|
07-06-09 08:24am
|
Reply
1144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am into the erotic female form and find nothing at all erotic about an underage girl or a model who appears to be an underage girl.
I pass on that stuff just as I pass on those BBW's who are just fat slobs.
|
07-06-09 08:17am
|
Reply
1145
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fortherecord777's Comment
Quick question.
Is there a comprehensive search function that one can use to find models with specific attributes, such as large breasts, small breasts, blond, large labias, outdoors, etc., etc.?
|
06-22-09 11:14am
|
Reply
1146
|
I Can't Believe You Sucked A Negro
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Wasn't more than 10-15 years ago that the words Whore and Fuck were never used on a site's name.
They want to sell smut. No more, no less. Don't give it more than its due.
|
06-21-09 03:53pm
|
Reply
1147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The point of porn is the fantasy. The only thing that cannot be fantasy is that the babe must be at least 18 years old.
If a site posts a girl who was 19 years old at the time it was posted in 2006, should the site say that she was 19 when posted in 2006?
Personally, WGAF?. (Who Gives a Fuck?) If she was young looking back when the post happened that's all that matters anyway, isn't it?
|
06-21-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
1148
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Too bad they don't read PU.
Just signed up this weekend and the problems described two years ago and in this review are the same. A pity because I've stumbled into some really great stuff and some great resolution videos...and some total shit as well.
This site, with some professional website help, could be superb. Hopefully they will learn how to merge functionality with their hidden quality.
A score of 70 is very fair but with structure it could be a 90.
|
06-20-09 11:13pm
|
Reply
1149
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Boy am I with you on that. I make it a point to always use the PU link when I'm ready to sign up for a site. They (PU) earned my loyalty big time to the point where I might even sign up via PU even if it costs me an extra $5.
|
06-20-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
1150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have a brother and a sister. My brother, a professional video guy, finds porn boring so it's unlikely he would ask. By brother in law (my sister's husband) works for the US gummint so he has lots of free time at work and frequently asks me for some of my stash. Again, no problem.
|
06-15-09 12:25pm
|
