| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Absolutely. Especially on single person sites, like Victoria Pink or Hitomi. BUT only after checking PU/TBP and also the preview site.
|
10-16-14 02:47pm
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
To me the sounds add to the scene so when I hear "fuck me hard" in a female voice while the babe is getting plugged with her mouth closed destroys the scene completely.
|
10-13-14 10:36am
|
Reply
328
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Nicely written review! I really like your narrative style.
I spent just a few minutes checking out the site and see what you mean. The teaser video is into female degradation and will make misogynous guys, but few others, happy.
A shame, because Aussie babes are super hot and less reserved on average than their American counterparts.
|
10-12-14 09:19am
|
Reply
329
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
tikkit's Reply
I rejoined for one month using a special deal. They modified the cross promotion formats so they aren't "quite" as likely to be accidentally activated.
However I agree that NA now qualifies to be banned from pU/TBP because of their lousy and deceptive business practices.
The Bang Bros scam is just a tad different because their game is played via a promotional email and not on the site itself. It's lousy, but if you sign up for the site and don't respond to their emails, you're safe...at least for now.
|
10-11-14 07:59pm
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Adds nothing at all. Worse, it kills the fantasy that both (all) participants are truly into the sex.
|
10-07-14 02:54pm
|
Review
331
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.
The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.
The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).
There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.
The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).
Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples |
| Cons: |
Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.
Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.
The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.
I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material. |
| Bottom Line: |
The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.
Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.
In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.
The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.
In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.
The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.
I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.
My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.
Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.
Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.
One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up. |
|
10-06-14 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Agree generally with Drooler.
I watch porn to check out the babe and her gorgeous body parts. Give me variety with great angles and mixes of closeups and full body shots. Yes I love the gynecology shots, especially when bodily fluids are being secreted, boob massage, nipple pulling, etc., but lately the vids are focused on the guys butt, schlong and "dangleberries" when the babe's fabulous boobs are out of the camera's range.
That's why I like what Score does (tit-centric all the way) with occasional and very brief shots of male body parts. Other sites with great camera work are DDF and ALS (all varieties). Naughty America and Evil Angel not so much.
|
10-06-14 02:27pm
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not only is it degrading, to me it's feeding those guys who innately have a hatred of women and see the humiliation effort as a sort of "payback" for how women have treated the guy his whole life.
Other stuff that turns me cold are:
gagging
slapping
choking
physical abuse of any kind
laughing at and belittling the babe after a fuck scene
I would like to see some retorts by the babe like:
pencil dick
30 second wonder
tiny dick
next time I want a real man
a physical fight back
|
10-02-14 10:11am
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
WAY way too much. And I can only think the ladies who take it up the poop chute do so because they get paid for it. I really can't believe they enjoy the sensation any more than I enjoy the proctologist doing a prostate check.
|
09-29-14 08:03pm
|
Comment
335
|
Zishy
(0)
|
|
09-28-14 11:31am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ditto.
The only exception is when I have a problem of some kind and contact the support function. Don't know whether the response comes from the webmaster or a support person...if there is a response.
|
09-27-14 11:07am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Agree. I would guess that about 50% of the "special discounts" offered by email or that I find when checking out a site outside the TBP link are the same as, or not as good as, the TBP discount.
|
09-25-14 09:49am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Seeing some guy yanking his shank doesn't really do much for me. After all I can see that in my mirror.
I'm OK with casual content that has a babe massaging a guy's junk. However, not if it's the major aspect of a video.
|
09-23-14 10:34am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ditto. The only aftermarket installation I have ever found appealing were with Memphis Monroe's. They were done by someone who understood the appeal of nat mams.
An old controversy was whether Carmella Bing's mams were all natural but since she has decided to add a lot of weight (I gotta believe she's way over 200 lbs) it no longer matters.
|
09-21-14 10:40am
|
Reply
340
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I would say the ratio is about 60% bared boobs and 50% bared pussy. The bikinis usually come off altogether.
There's self touching but no insertions or hard core.
|
09-20-14 04:59pm
|
Reply
341
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Pedrote's Comment
Yes, I get tons of spam which had to come from some (or all) of the sites I've joined.
However I've never had my credit card info compromised over many years of joining on line sites.
Two techniques I use;
1. I have a separate Hotmail account that I use just for porn and nothing else. That means I can stop all porn spam simply by closing that email account.
2. I use a single credit card account exclusively for porn sites and nothing else. I asked the issuer to set an $80.00 credit limit on that account which will have the benefit of not having any bogus big charges go through. So far I have had no attempts by unauthorized parties trying to process a charge.
|
09-20-14 10:09am
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't like 'em. Never did, never will.
|
09-17-14 01:31pm
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Two examples of "dramatic chqnges" that demonstrate that a babe has "turned the corner."
Carmella Bing whose current photos suggest that she's well over 200 pounds of gross fat. Link to:The "new" Carmella Bing
Jana Jordan/Foxy whose body was perfect with small, but perfect, tits. Then she got a boob job. Awful.
I would have said "doing anal" if I could pick two choices. I know anal is popular but, to me, doing anal is a sign a babe has starting her desperation tailspin. (I can't believe any woman could possibly enjoy getting porked up her poop chute.)
|
09-13-14 06:30pm
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
In my opinion, the only sites that don't need a search function are those with so little content that the site can be drained in just a few days.
The counter is a site where the search function is inaccurate (VideoBox, for example) and thus makes it nearly impossible to find your favorite model.
|
09-05-14 11:12am
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I am more interested in female body parts than male body parts so how the male appendage is attired is of no particular interest to me.
Some of my favorite scenes on my hard drive have guys with condoms.
|
09-03-14 10:55pm
|
Reply
346
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ditto.
Much more stuff for much less $$$. The old video rentals were great at 3 tapes/ 3 days / $7 but with an average of 5 scenes per video that meant about 50 cents per scene. VideoBox offers 150+/- scenes per month at about 10 cents a scene.
Best part is storage. Tapes took up a tom of space and trying to locate a favorite scene required a precise indexing system.
|
09-01-14 12:56pm
|
Reply
347
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
International M's Reply
I just received an email from Club Seventeen and have always deleted them immediately. With the amount of governmental cyberspying these days, the last thing I need is to have the Federal authorities snag me for possessing child pornography on my hard drive; a felony with prison time in the USA.
This is from the US Dept. of Justice website:
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide/citizensguide_porn.html
While I appreciate your statement that you do not offer any images of girls who are under 18, I hope you understand why I am unwilling to take any chances. I doubt you will be able to testify on my behalf if I'm brought up on Federal charges for downloading any material from Club Seventeen and, more importantly, convince the jury that your site has no images of underage girls.
|
08-31-14 11:17am
|
Reply
348
|
Busty Buffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks, Pat. I think I'll hang for a few months before I do anything.
|
08-28-14 06:55pm
|
Reply
349
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
longjohn351's Reply
This is another example of why PU is so great. Thanks longjohn for escalating the issue and JamesDavid for adjusting the download limit. It's a win for the website.
|
08-28-14 12:17pm
|
Reply
350
|
Busty Buffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Lucie Wilde did some work that appears on DDF Prod. The first video is so tame where she exposed only her boobs (and what wonderful boobs they are), that I suspect it was her first gig. There are a few other DDF videos, but now that I know about this site I may well wind up dropping some coin on a membership.
|
08-28-14 12:11pm
|
