| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Gotcha. I do have some scenes that I do not think I will ever get into, but the "collector" in me just will not let me hit the delete button. On the other hand, I do have some that I would never delete if for some reason I could only keep so much. I really do not see that happening any time soon though. Hard drives are getting cheaper and bigger. My real fear is losing a drive before I back it up and losing some of those "magical" scenes.
|
08-11-08 07:29pm
|
Reply
752
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
MAN!!! I could not imagine pushing the delete key. That is all most evil in my eyes. Actually i do delete only the absolute worst, but most things I end up keeping around. To me 100 GB is pocket change, unfortunately it costs more than pocket change. I have the attitude that you never know when you will want to see that scene again. Because it does not interest me now does not mean it never will in the future. Thus, I keep pretty much everything.
|
08-11-08 06:45pm
|
Reply
753
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
They seem to be doing this a lot lately. I got on their discount some time ago as a retention offer they gave me after I was canceling after a $30 single month. For all the content it is hard to beat $10 a month. And, it is a good site, so joining here really is a no brainer for anyone who likes big breasts.
|
08-11-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Oh my! I wish I only had spent the money on 5 hard drives. Even that can be expensive though, especial when you factor in the cost of the websites for material and the charge for internet access. It all gets pretty expensive in a hurry!
I have spent thousands on hard drives alone. I am sure I would shit my self if I actually sat down and figured out exactly what porn has cost me over the past few years.
|
08-11-08 05:49pm
|
Reply
755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I download and watch porn even during a school semester. Actually, I have a final exam tomorrow and here I am talking to another addict. Kinda like holding an AA meeting at a bar.
I used to love telling people how many pictures and videos I had. My last count was 1,200,000 all together, and most people would drop their jaw when they seen that. This was about 2 years ago, I would love to see them now. Actually I do not even know how much I actually have. It is too disorganized still, but getting better. All that is the collector side of me showing.
It really does keep me a little too occupied though. If I would spend half as much time studying as I do with porn I would be able to add a good point to my GPA!!
|
08-11-08 05:44pm
|
Comment
756
|
Ebony Cum Dumps
(0)
|
|
08-11-08 04:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
757
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think there should have been an option to select all! I am addicted to collecting porn and it keeps things interesting and prevent boredom.
|
08-11-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
758
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
This really does seem like a once a year kinda site. The updates take a little while to come in so it makes it hard to justify paying even the $20 a month for the amount of new scenes you get in a month's time.
Me personally, I like to download and keep forever! You never know when you will want to see that scene again and it would be a shame to have to download another 1.5 GB to get the same thing again. The only trouble with this is that it can get rather expensive!
|
08-09-08 07:42pm
|
Comment
759
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
|
08-06-08 03:55pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
760
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
In that case I can not share a respect you might feel you have earned. Ace of Aces is a valued PU and he has my respect. His "childish" statement was in fact very valid. You can not vote on his trust rating because you have not done any reviews yourself to see the other side of the fence here. Pointing out a fact does not make him childish?
I would like to add that we are not necessarily paid for doing these reviews. What monies we do by chance get through the raffle does not even come close to covering all the costs of going through all these websites. Hell the $400 I have gotten so far does not even pay for the hard drives I have used since I began reviewing. But I am greatful for it all the same, everything helps. Besides, there are those of us who do post here simply to help out another PU to make informed decisions and avoid being ripped off and get a lot from the work of other PUs that have taken the time and effort to post.
Also, sometimes sites lack in certain areas but go well beyond in others and it can make up the slack produced elsewhere. Videobox does post some lame videos, but they make up for it in their absolute size and that if you do not like a few videos there are plenty others to move on to. When reading a reviewers reviews you have to look at a few of their others to get a feel for that reviewers style and taste. If a reviewer has a taste for blonde teens he might give a blonde teen site a little higher score than you might feel is warranted simply because he got what he wanted.
|
08-04-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
761
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
About Videobox, how would a site make a video truly in HD if it was actually filmed in standard quality? That would be cheating. Videobox does have speed as well. I have spent countless hours downloading at 40 MBit/s and a fair amount of time even faster. I can not comment about customer service either way, I have never needed to contact them.
I believe the Xmovies score difference compared to Videobox is justified. They are basically the same site fundamentally. However, Videobox has more videos, more options for download, higher bit rates, and costs less especially to users who do not join trough TBP. Therefore, Videobox in fundamental areas is superior thus warranting a higher score. Analogy: If you compare a Camaro to a Firebird one might get a 98 while the other gets a 95 since they are about the same in many respects, now compare that Camaro to Saleen S7 TT and now the S7 gets a 99 and the Camaro gets a 80 simply because of what it is being compared to. Videobox gets its score because no other site in that genre has touched them on fundamental issues and because many people simply like it better.
As for Rachel Aziani, there is some hardcore content. Admittedly there is not a lot but it certainly does exist. Solo sites can be repetitive on what goes on, but that is understood when joining. If someone joins a site that features one model they typically have a keen interest in that model and want to see her in as much as they can get their hands on. I for example I am huge Amy Reid fan and would download 100 scenes of her doing about the same thing with out thinking twice about it. Many times the only true difference is a change in setting and clothing, which is enough. I love seeing the same model in different outfits. Solo masturbation is usually about the same across any site, some sites show many different models, but they are doing about the same thing. On a solo site you get the same model which can be nice because you are familiar with her and do not have to wonder if the scene is worth downloading and watching because you do not know if you will like the model or not.
If you do not like the reviews and scores given to sites then you should consider writing some yourself. It is much easier to critic someone else's writing than to write your own, I noticed this myself quickly when I first started writing reviews here.
"The intelligent reader," I would like to point out that I do have a reasonably high IQ and I would be willing to bet than many of the top posters on this site are above average as well. We have managed to keep things fairly civilized around here, unlike many other forums which typically is a sign of intelligence.
Also, we do not appreciate insulting Ace of Aces. Intelligent people should be above that. Besides, I doubt that a 13 year old has signed up for and wrote reviews for 60 sites or so using mom's credit card while going unnoticed! These things tend to stand out. Ace of Aces has my respect.
|
08-02-08 09:44pm
|
Reply
762
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I was afraid that was the situation. I never liked that in the bast and it will make it much harder to know what has been downloaded previously and what is new. Oh well. Thank you both for the heads up.
I rename stuff on many sites, but at times it is not needed. Anymore I rename them as they are downloaded while the information is fresh, if I wait i will never remember what I wanted to name it! I have been using "D-System's Keyboard Remapper" for a while now and it greatly helps with this. It saves me a lot of typing, basically by pressing two keys I can copy the model's name and add to or overwrite the file the name of the site and the model name. This is godsend to being a very heavy downloader.I used it on every zip file from Nubiles and and every zip and video from Reality Kings.
|
07-27-08 08:15pm
|
Reply
763
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
How about the zip files them selves. I remember them having some pretty strange names in the past. When I unzip the zp files I usually have the file name be used for the folder name, so the name is fairly important, otherwise I have to rename everything all the time....very time consuming!
|
07-25-08 07:12pm
|
Reply
764
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
I have been wanting to know if the zip files are still named weird. I was a member there for a long time but ended over a year ago and have been wanting to rejoin. I never liked how stuff was named there because it was hard to tell exactly what it was after downloading.
|
07-25-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
765
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gotcha! It has been a while since I read through all the rules, they are getting a bit rust to me again. Thanks for link, everything makes sense. I can see how it would be hard to allow everything to be changed all the time and removed and still represent the whole picture.
Thank you Khan for pointing these things out to me!
|
07-25-08 01:16pm
|
Reply
766
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.
|
07-24-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
767
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.
Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.
|
07-24-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
768
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
|
07-24-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
769
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.
Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)
I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.
|
07-23-08 07:22pm
|
Reply
770
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.
You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.
|
07-23-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
771
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hum....looks like someone is on the rag!
Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!
You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!
|
07-23-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
772
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Toadmix
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
|
07-23-08 04:01pm
|
Reply
773
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
I would prefer not to use FLV. Not exactly my favorite file type. Any more you have to have good clarity in videos and picture. As a user that is a high priority when looking at a site that covers a common niche. If you had a more obscure niche then you could get away with lower quality, but that is not the case here. Quality sells!
|
07-22-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
774
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is a pretty good review Exotics! You give some pretty good insght.
By the way. I did download every single video, and damn glad I did! They certainly will not be in recycle bin.
|
07-21-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
775
|
Fembomb.com
(0)
|
Reply of
libre62's Comment
There has been several places that do that. The seem to charge you whatever you local currency is and do not apply the conversion. At least this is being done with the Euro since it is stronger than the dollar. I do not know if this is being done in places where the dollar is dominant.
|
07-21-08 04:26pm
|
