Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : badandy400 (0)  

Feedback:   All (1088)  |   Reviews (64)  |   Comments (70)  |   Replies (954)

Other:   Replies Received (510)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 326-350 of 1088 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
326
Visit What Boys Want

What Boys Want
(0)
Reply of careylowell's Review

This may or may not pertain to this review, but I need to ask you something.

I was just looking around and for no reason clicked on your name. I noticed you had a single "NO" trust and I was curious as to what it was for. The person believed you did not join some of the sites you had reviewed. You replied saying "I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned for at least one month. No review based on a trial m'ship."

Is this statement implying that you had not joined them two of them, or simply that you joined and left before a second month. The distinction is very important. If you had not joined them how could you review them? Also, which of the nine sites DID you join? At this point I think it is just poor choice of wording, but it is unclear.

I am a little reluctant to throw out a "NO" trust on you because your more recent reviews seem much more in depth and honest. I would like some clarification on this just in case there is a misunderstanding. It was not that long ago a reviewer had all his review points removed and was semi-suspended for implying that he did not join sites he had reviewed. I do not want this to happen to you, but I (all of PU) need to know that you have actually joined all the sites you have reviewed.


07-11-09  12:45am

Reply
327
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Being 24 I am way outside the limits. I started looking at porn a little young but I was not even an itch in my dad's pants yet!

I could live with soundless, I usually watch it that way anyway, but black and white would annoy a me a little. I am sure at the time that was great stuff. But, after seeing the HD stuff of today it would be a little difficult for me to go for black and white porn for the sake of getting off. However, I am sure that if I needed to I could get off on that stuff.


07-11-09  12:22am

Reply
328
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I joined Twists a while back, several years actually. I am sure the site has improved some since then. I know they have merged with some other sites which is good and other PUs say they are doing well. I will be rejoining them soon though.

I like this poll because a first porn site is a little like a first car. No matter if the site is great or not so great it is the first and is liked and remembered anyway. The first kinda sets the bar for other sites. Also a first site can directly impact what a user looks for in other sites and whether or not they will join other sites. We have heard a few people come here with issues regarding their first site and are scared to pay to join another.


07-09-09  12:15am

Reply
329
Visit Mature.nl

Mature.nl
(0)
Reply of james4096's Comment

You are right, that is insane. The only way I can see paying anything remotely close to the price is if the site is covering a unique niche and doing a damn good job of it. For example something like "midget lesbians having sex while skydiving" niche and making a lot of great videos in HD. That might warrant the price because it is likely the only place it will ever be seen. But this site does not seem to have anything that other mature women sites would not have. Perhaps they feel that since we pay $20 to see 20 year olds and $30 for allover30 they feel they should follow the pattern and ask for $60 for 60 year olds! Or perhaps an escort come with the membership fee.

Seriously though, $60 a month is simply suicide. They could probably charge half that and get ten times the members. I guess someone was very, very high when deciding the price.


07-08-09  07:44pm

Reply
330
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of Horstl's Review

Not be defensive of Videobox for their sake but I must point out that this review is very similar to the one you did for AbbyWinters. Not saying the reviews are the same or fake. The point is that the pros and cons are basically the same and the overall opinion is about the same, which is fine, but the score is very different. You have VideoBox as an 80 and AbbyWinters as a 95!

People having different opinions here is great and it is expected that people will score site differently. The problem is that it I can not figure out why these two sites were scored differently based off your reviews. I am hoping you can enlighten me on this, because right now it seemed like you felt about the same for both of them.


07-08-09  07:37pm

Reply
331
Visit Housewife Gemma

Housewife Gemma
(0)
Reply of csbadger49's Review

I site that "had it all" other than recent updates is hardly worth being bashed with a 50. A site no longer updating can be worth a few points taken off and certainly worth a warning, but a 50 is usually reserved for those sites that are true rip offs and in no way meet any of the expectations they instill into the viewers. This is not the first site you have called a complete failure only for not have enough content. It is important to remember that no every site will be a mega site the instant it starts up. In to cases now you have said that a site has good content that you enjoyed and it what you were looking for but gave 50s to the sites.

While I am not going to be jumpy about giving a negative trust just yet, it would be a good idea to consider what make a site a failure. In most members of PU opinions a site having great content can out weight so some extent a lack of content. Also, a site that no longer update might be worth for some people to join if they never have before to see what was their before the site slowed down.


07-08-09  07:29pm

Reply
332
Visit SF Bay Models

SF Bay Models
(0)
Reply of oogles's Review

Nice warning about this one. Of course though do feel free to extend pros or cons into the bottom line area if you ever feel you need to. But on this one I think you got the point across just fine. :)

07-08-09  12:57am

Reply
333
N/A Reply of mbaya's Reply

I do! I do! There do you feel better now?

This is the advantage of internet porn. No one has to know who is looking at what. People do not have to ask friends for it and worry if they will think they are strange for it. The privacy factor is huge.

Of course being younger my friends mostly freely admit looking at porn and we have no issue discussing it. But, we are not married and freshly out of college.


07-08-09  12:54am

Reply
334
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

Only on rare occasions with a friend. He does not get to keep anything, mostly just showing off what I have or if they want to see what a certain site has.

I have never uploaded anything onto any share site and really do not intend to. Seems like a lot of work to do just for the sake of ripping off the sites who provide us with our beloved porn.

I do not have so much issue with letting friends borrow DVDs though. As far as I know this is legal.


07-07-09  12:19am

Reply
335
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

I never really got the point of an industry awarding itself, particularly as much as the entertainment industry. It is nothing more than an elaborate, expensive way of giving yourself a blowjob and making everyone else wish they could blow you too.

What is good and what is not is so subjective that it really does not matter what these people say. Just like here, some reviewers will view things much differently than others. So unless it is based on fact or you know the reviewer you may or may not truly trust it.


06-29-09  02:52am

Reply
336
Visit Exploited Moms

Exploited Moms
(0)
Reply of james4096's Comment

Well some people tend to believe that everyone is still on dial up.

06-28-09  06:48pm

Reply
337
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

In other words OnlyTease my not be for you. They are very hit and miss on which girls will strip to nothing. Many times the girl will only go to panties and 75% of the scene is fully clothed. They have it backwards a bit. I like 25% clothed and 75% full nude give or take.

I am not much into the seemingly popular gonzo style. I find this to be lazy porn. I really like to see a woman in cloths as well as nude. After all in real life here when with a woman 98% of the time she is clothed. That 2% might even be a stretch for some. So it is very important that a woman looks good clothed. Knowing a woman in porn looks god in cloths as well as out really adds to the fantasy.


06-27-09  06:06pm

Reply
338
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I have before but only because the girl was very good looking, and another time because I was not aware it was non nude. In that case the site tour page made no indication it was not nude and every indication that it was. I can not remember the site name now, it has been some time now.

Personally I like a bit of tease before the nude. So site that have the girl start off clothed and work her way down to nothing in an erotic way appeal the most to me.


06-27-09  02:05am

Reply
339
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

Oh that sucks so bad! My membership just ran out a few weeks ago because my credit card numbers changed after having been a member for about 2 years!

Now lets think about this for a moment. They are claiming more demand on their system. So they make you stick around for half a year downloading all the while then make you go back and redownload everything in HD. This is a waste for us and them. Basically we either wait half a year to begin downloading or download everything twice. If this were my company I would have fired this person for being retarded and bring this idea up in the first place.

I always though people running large network sites where stupid, and here is yet more proof. I swear when the people do something right they actually try to dampen the impact of the good news by counteracting with something incredibly stupid.


06-25-09  09:08pm

Reply
340
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of fiou's Reply

I just looked at the sign up page and found this:

"Your credit card will be charged immediately after your order by the name isupportgateway.com 661-621-9701."

I would give that site a try. But keep in mind when you try to find your account that the reason you have no email from them is you may have mistype your email address. After all, they only have you type it once with retype for verification and all of us screw it up form time to time. So search using your username and password if that is an option, or your credit card number.

If this site turns up nothing give them a call, this usually works better anyway. Also, do check out the sign up page because I did see several other sites listed. e-support24.com, EuroRevenue.com

Good luck!


06-25-09  12:12pm

Reply
341
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of fiou's Reply

My point was that a billing company can make errors with no help from the site and the site would likely never know about, unless of course you emailed them about it.

Not responding to your messages is a whole different issue and lays directly on the site's lap.

Since you are not on a trial I would say you can breath a little relief since you have a little more time figure it out. Also, do take a deep breath, if you signed up yesterday they have not even had a chance to ignore you yet. If they are slow responding to you, more often than not, just keep sending them reminders everyday. Eventually they will get sick of you and will do something about it.

Anyway, I would suggest going to the site's home page and so through the sign up process again just like you did last time. Obviously do not give them your credit card information. But there is a good chance that the page that asks for that information will also display who the billing company is.


06-25-09  12:04pm

Reply
342
Visit Xisty

Xisty
(0)
Reply of GCode's Reply

See, that is just it. I can not tell you about new stuff yet. I will likely be joining them soon and I will be glad to let you know then.

Or if anyone reading this has been a recent member it would be really easy to figure out. All we need to do is list a few model names, find a few that are the same, and make a quick description of the beginning of a scene. If they match than we know something is not exclusive.


06-25-09  12:35am

Reply
343
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

First off I am not that much to look at. I am not ugly but I am not hot either. I agree a lot with Wittyguy on this one. When I am 80 I would because it would be funny, but now I would not because it is so risky. Especially now when I am trying to find a professional job.

I do not think less of people who do post nude pictures, obviously I enjoy them just like every single person on this site. I feel the same way about the women I have dated. I do not want to see them nude online somewhere, especially the one I have been with for 6 years now. She is not ugly by any means, I just like knowing that she is not being spread around everywhere. Every normal man is greed when it comes to his lady, he likes to know that he can see while everyone else has to wonder. I would never, and have never, even considered putting any nude pictures of my girlfriend or even former girl friends on the internet. That would be for them to do.

Bottom line:
You will not see my hairy ass on PU's "Reviewers Exposed" any time soon. Besides, than everyone would know I am not joking when I joke about the size of my wiener. :)


06-25-09  12:30am

Reply
344
Visit Xisty

Xisty
(0)
Reply of GCode's Reply

I do want to stress that this is for older content. I am not sure about newer content since I have not had a membership to Xisty in a while. The site still look to be worth joining and the new stuff could very well be exclusive since the site has had time to grow and become strong enough to produce.

06-24-09  09:06pm

Reply
345
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of fiou's Comment

That is interesting. You should be able to tell from your credit card statement who the billing company is based off the date and amount billed. This is of course assuming that you are not on a two day trial or something where timing is very important.

The trouble here is that you may be placing undue blame on the site itself. A site has little control over the credit card processor's actions. If they screw something up the site will never know about. Your beef is actually with the billing company. It is good to always make sure a few minutes after joining that you at least get an email with the sign up information, otherwise make a spreadsheet with all your sign up details for reference. Which of course can be hard if you do not know who the billing processor ended up being, but it usually says this on the page where you put in your credit card information.

Sorry about your issues. We know who it feels!


06-24-09  08:22pm

Comment
346
Visit Xisty

Xisty
(0)

Perhaps not so exclusive

This site is listed as exclusive, may not be entirely true. The site even says "we shoot all content" which may be true but than others are getting a hold of it. So we are not trying to point any fingers at TBP here!

I have seen some of this content on Babelicious. I currently have a subscription there and downloaded some videos I really thought I had seen before. Sure enough I just found them in my collection with Xisty.com watermark on them. The exact same video found on babelicious with their watermark right on the video. Only difference was Babelicious used a higher bit rate and thus had a better quality.

Does this speak for the whole site or just perhaps older material I can not yet say. But I can say that there is some material that can be found else where.

If you have a membership to both sites you can check this out for your self. The video that first caught my eye was a video with Aneta Keys and Tori, both sites use this name. And another with Aneta and Niky(Xisty)/Irena G(Babelicious). There are a few others: Julia Bright, Justina, Jeny Baby and so on....all the same video.

Again to be fair, I have found this only for some older videos, 2006/2007. They may be exclusive now, but worth looking into anyway.

06-24-09  08:15pm

Replies (6)
Reply
347
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I have done it several times but not in a while now. It does does feel a little different, but I would not say better or worse though. It seems that girls really do not get much out of it so I do not see much need for it. It can be fun though, but only in the sense it is different and "dirty" so long as it does not get literally dirty.

06-23-09  02:43pm

Reply
348
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I figure a lot of them are not being truthful about actual age, but are truthful about look. When they say they look young they usually do and that is what matter.

Age can be a very deceitful stat when it comes to women in porn and everywhere else in life. I know very old people that feel and look much younger and the opposition. I even dated a woman who was 25 but look like she was 13, this works both ways.

A little make up, lighting, and the simple fact that women love to lie about their age will make pretty much any woman seem younger than she is.


06-21-09  01:30am

Reply
349
Visit All Network Pass

All Network Pass
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Hate to hear that. Sometimes I wonder if it is possible to get someones previous username and reactivate their account that way. The reason I wonder this is because if I go to Mac & Bummble there is sometime a "reactivate you account" button that the bottom of the page. The fine print read that it charges your credit card using stored information. So the thought here is that possibly all someone may need is your previous username to screw you over. I do not know if this would give that person access or not, but you will still get the bill for it.

Anyway, please do let us know how this turns out.


06-20-09  10:24pm

Reply
350
Visit I Can't Believe You Sucked A Negro

I Can't Believe You Sucked A Negro
(0)
Reply of jd1961's Comment

I bet this is a hit among rednecks, neo nazis, and the KKK.

They did exactly what they wanted to do. They want to shock in some way those how have pretty much seen it all. The blatantness is simply to attract attention, good or bad is irrelevant.


06-20-09  10:11pm


Shown : 326-350 of 1088 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.33 seconds.