| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.
Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.
|
07-24-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
727
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
|
07-24-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
728
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.
Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)
I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.
|
07-23-08 07:22pm
|
Reply
729
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.
You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.
|
07-23-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
730
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hum....looks like someone is on the rag!
Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!
You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!
|
07-23-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
731
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Toadmix
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
|
07-23-08 04:01pm
|
Reply
732
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
I would prefer not to use FLV. Not exactly my favorite file type. Any more you have to have good clarity in videos and picture. As a user that is a high priority when looking at a site that covers a common niche. If you had a more obscure niche then you could get away with lower quality, but that is not the case here. Quality sells!
|
07-22-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
733
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is a pretty good review Exotics! You give some pretty good insght.
By the way. I did download every single video, and damn glad I did! They certainly will not be in recycle bin.
|
07-21-08 05:40pm
|
Review
734
|
We Live Together
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Models look absolutely wonderful!
-Updates weekly on Thursday
-Loads of scenes so far
-Full access to a huge network of sites
-Price is decent, $25
-Videos are long, around 45 minutes average
-Exclusive content
-Site navigation is pretty simple
-Zips for photo sets
-Loads of lesbians! Damn I love lesbians! |
| Cons: |
-DOWNLOAD LIMIT- All sites
-The videos are sub-par looking
-Photos are small, 900x600
-Older videos are in chunks only
-Some people might like more download file types |
| Bottom Line: |
This section of the network is great, so make sure you check it out. I am a huge fan of lesbians and that is what this one is about. There are a huge amount of threesomes and more! All the girls are good looking and some are absolutely stunning.
The video are like the rest of the network and need a lot of clarity work. The bit rate is around 1.2 MBit/s depending on the video. There are 250 currently and you would need 60 GBs to hold them all. The resolution varies a bit from terrible up to 720x480, but the bitrate just does not support a great looking video. Do not get me wrong though, the content of the videos is awesome.
The photos are a lame size here. 900x600 is the best is gets, but they look nice for the size. They need to work on that a bit, but keep in mind it is a video site. Older photos are just screens, but newer ones are actual photos, so they really should be better.
I would give this site a higher score if they could catch up on visual clarity. The content is great and I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in a couple chicks meeting another girl and then banging her lights out! They have a nice theme and offer good amount of lead up to the sex, this is typical for the whole network.
By itself this site is worth the membership, the rest of the sites are a huge added bonus. Hell, there is over 175 HOURS of video already and it is still growing! |
|
07-21-08 05:36pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
735
|
Fembomb.com
(0)
|
Reply of
libre62's Comment
There has been several places that do that. The seem to charge you whatever you local currency is and do not apply the conversion. At least this is being done with the Euro since it is stronger than the dollar. I do not know if this is being done in places where the dollar is dominant.
|
07-21-08 04:26pm
|
Reply
736
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am not really in a situation where taking a computer to a shop would be practical. I really should post a photo somewhere of my set up...it is a total mess!
I have had a computer completely crash before, they only thing I could do was a fresh install. But I did it on another drive and used my old drive as a secondary, so I really did not lose anything. Besides a repair guy that would have a firm grip on everything I try to make my stuff do would likely be working some place bigger than a home pc repair shop.
|
07-21-08 04:23pm
|
Review
737
|
Boob Study
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Full access trial, 2 days
Many large breasted models
Updates daily!
Shows a picture from coming updates
Photos have Zips
decent picture size, zips only though
A good amount of content
Can search by model
Simple naviagtion |
| Cons: |
Very little har4dcore, no lesbian found
Photos are small in browser
Access to other sites is a joke, just junk streams
Some videos must be downloaded in chunks, up to 10
You only have one option for file type, wmv
Must relog in periodically, messes up downloaders |
| Bottom Line: |
All around I would say this is a good site. I will definitely be keeping this one on my periodic rejoin list. The girl look pretty good and they have awesome natural breasts.
The video quality here is not bad at 2040 KBit/s for all of the videos, even the first ones. There is currently 114 videos but they update daily. The videos are 640x480 or 720x480 and total for 22.2 GB. They could use a little work but look nice regardless.
The photo sets are strange in that if you just browse through them and look you will only see a low res picture. If you download the zip you get the high res pictures. The photos look very nice though and I always go for the zips anyway. The older ones are at 768x1024 and the newer photos are at 1200x1800 and really do look crisp.
Your log in will last a good part of the evening, but you cant just put the whole site in your download manager and let it rip...unless you got a hell of a connection! The speed of the site is good as well.
The only difference between here and DDFBusty for example is the age of the model and that there is very little hardcore. Well, there is a price difference too.
I would recommend this site to anyone who does not mind a lot of solo content or someone who is addicted to naturally large breasts on girls who do not look like they spent too much time at the all-you-can-eat buffet. |
|
07-21-08 04:15pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
738
|
MILF Next Door
(0)
|
|
07-17-08 04:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
739
|
N/A
|
Reply of
moshic's Reply
Maybe it is just be, but I would love to see high quality videos at 1080. The bit rate for this to look decent would most likely have to be 8 MBit/s and that would make for some pretty big files. Personally I am okay with that though. on the other hand I understand that not everyone wants to file up their hard drive with just a few hours of video. Me on the other hand do not care about size as long as the video is of stunning quality. I have plenty of hard drive space.
|
07-17-08 03:35pm
|
Reply
740
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
People's business models change as time goes on. I really do not know if they were trying to cover a cost somewhere, or just using a bait and switch move. You are right though about Porn Users. That is why I am here, let others know what I know and learn what others already know.
|
07-17-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
741
|
Veggie Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
All Porn Site Pass
I joined through that, well one of the sites in that network and it granted access to the veggie site. I am not sure what the deal was there but that is how I ended up with access.
|
07-15-08 03:26pm
|
Review
742
|
Veggie Bang
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Nice trial price
Good looking girls
Short interview before sex
Access to a good deal of small sites
Videos look nice
Sticks to its name, Veggies!
No DRM or limits |
| Cons: |
Very small site
No hardcore or even Girl/Girl
Site very simple, too simple
Camera guy needs to shut up sometime
Sometimes pretty lame camera work
Many network sites do not work right |
| Bottom Line: |
AT this point this site is only worth a trial in my opinion. It need a good amount of growth to stand on its own.
It only has 17 videos totaling for 2.94 GB. The videos are 10-20 minutes long and at 2 MBit/s. The resolution is al the same at 640x480 and look fairly nice.
This site gives access to a load of other sites. This sounds great except that many of the sites do not work or have about the same content as other sites offered. There are enough sites that do work to make a trial worth while. You just have to use trial and error for a minute to find one that will take you to something real.
If you are into teens inserting veggies than this one should be put your list of site to check out. But make sure you have a few days to make the most of the trial. |
|
07-14-08 06:44pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
743
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Full network access
320 Scenes
Zipped photos
Easy layout
Many great looking women
Most women are shaved and have nice tits
Good lead up to sex
Fair price at $25
Updates every Monday |
| Cons: |
Photos are small, even the newer ones
The download limit sucks
Could use more variety in scenes
Needs more group scenes
Older videos can only be downloaded in chunks
Video clarity needs work |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into mature women this site is a must have. It offers a great deal of content at a decent price. Plus the network access makes it so much larger!
There are very few sub-par looking women here and a good lead up to the actual sex. Actually the lead up to the sex can be rather boring at times and needs some trimming. But I would rather askip ahead a bit than have them start the scene with them already going at it.
The pictures are pretty small here, 900x600 on the better end. the older ones are even smaller. Fortunately they come in zips though. Each scene has its own zip set, so 320 totaling for 8.4 GB.
The videos are pretty long at about 40 minutes for many of them. They do not look bad at 100% zoom, but at 200% they look fairly pixely. Their bit rate is 1-1.4 MBit/s and can be up to 500 MB for a full video. Currently they update every Monday pretty consistently so as of this review you would need 86 GB to download them all.
Also, there is a good deal of fake boobs here, so if you are turned off by that. Personally I do not mind, besides most of them are reasonable looking.
The idea for the site that a guy is walking around and runs into a hot woman in her 30s or so and ends up banging here. The story line is standard for the whole site, but who really cares anyway.
Since you would already have access to this site through the network it is worth looking at at least. And there is several milf sites on the network, so what are you waiting for? |
|
07-14-08 06:22pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
744
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
i do not like streaming at all to be honest. But I prefer windows media because IDM has an easier time grabbing it automatically so I can download it anyway.
|
07-14-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
745
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I have had Video box download at 50 MBit/s for many hours at a time even during afternoons and evenings. So I must agree that their speed is actually pretty good.
|
07-07-08 07:47pm
|
Review
746
|
Pregnant Coeds
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive Content
-Some good looking models
-Models are young mostly, less worn out looking
-Video quality is not bad
-Uses CCBill, my favorite
-Very easy to get around
-Some very nice lactation videos
-Mostly American Models |
| Cons: |
-No zips for picture, but so few pictures it hardly matter
-A bit pricy for the amount of content $25
-Site extremely plain
-No known update schedule, seems to be very slow
-Scenes can seem repetitive at times
-Needs a lot of growth
-All solo |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like this niche. Teens lactation and pregnant is so hot. A few of the girls look very good.
Unfortunately there is not a lot of sites that cover this niche, it seems that the porn stars just are not getting pregnant enough! All that cock all day long and it never happens? :)
The price is a limiting factor here. You have to really be into this stuff for the $25 price tag to be worth it. If they could offer some growth I would love to rejoin from time to time.
There is currently 78 videos totaling for 3.46 GB and range from 1-3 MBit/s and up to 640x480. Most of the videos are about 5 minutes long with some above 10 minutes. The clarity is not overly impressive,but I have certainly seen worse. Some of them look like they were recorded on VHS originally.
The pictures are not much. There is 57.3 MB worth for 652 pictures. The seem to be at 800x600 which it pretty small especially in this age of everything going high def.
There is not interaction here between the girls and no hardcore either. This is strictly solo stripping, showering, lactating, and masturbation.
I would recommend this one only to those who share this love for pregnant and/or lactating teens. I like the videos, although they are simple and can appreciate the work going into finding hot pregnant girls willing to shoot with them. If younger pregnant girls is not at the top of your list than I would say to spend you $25 elsewhere. |
|
07-07-08 07:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
747
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Review
How much content is here??? Resolutions?? I would really like more information!!
|
07-07-08 06:50pm
|
Review
748
|
Hot Sexy Plumpers
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Network access for 6 sites total, 100s of videos
-$4 trial is worth every penny
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Many hot, large women
-Variety of solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes
-Updates weekly
-Decent collection of videos, more than 80
-Videos named with women's name
-Decent resolution at 640x480
-Nice navigation
-Search function even for non-members |
| Cons: |
-Bit rate could be higher , 1-1.4 MBit/s
-Did not see any real photos
-Had to re login, but not too ofter
-Trial period short, 2 days
-Some women much less attractive than others |
| Bottom Line: |
The two day trial is wonderful here!!!
I am still very tempted to join for a full month to make sure I get everything. In two days I got 32 GB and had plenty more to go. There is six sites you have access to with many of the same women appearing on each one.
The videos are in the 30 minute range at 1-1.4 MBit/s and 640x480. The do not look bad at all, but they could still use some work.
Whenever joining a site like this I expect to see some very hot women and some that require a garbage bag over her head and one over mine in case her's comes off. This site meets that expectation, but has more hotter women than I had expected. Hell they even have a Gianna Micheals video and I am all about her!
The site is pretty easy to get around, but they do make you re-login every so ofter. A few times a day, but nothing major. Unfortunately this screws up some download managers.
The have a lot of solo scenes here, but there is lesbian and hardcore mixed in as well. I would like more lesbian stuff personally.
I would recommend at least checking out the trial, or at least checking the site out and search around since they let you see all the models before even joining! A two day trial for the price of a gallon of gas to download all you can....hummm....seems like a tough one to me. :) |
|
07-07-08 06:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
749
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would not get to rough on him though. He is right after all. I found that to be an extremely annoying part of this set of sites. Granted though it is worth the hassle to get the content. Besides, we were all "one post wonders" until we posted again. I am sure people thought the same of me when I made a big stink with my 100 score for Videobox, and look now, I have something like 300 posts. Gotta give people a chance, especially when they are right. Just do not be too blinded by the fact that you love a site to ignore flaws that other people might think is a big deal. I have been very irritated by things before and wanted to knock a site for it. I can understand him being mad because this site really does screw up download managers.
At the same time you guys are right as well. It is not something worth causing someone to overlook the site over. I loved the site and it is on my permanent rejoin list!
|
07-07-08 06:17pm
|
Review
750
|
Gag Freaks
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Cute girls
-Very hard blowjobs
-All scenes have two girls, double the pleasure :)
-Working full trial, read below for more details
-Easy to download
-Videos look decent for size are reasonable long |
| Cons: |
-Extremely small site
-Normal price very high
-Files not named descriptively, "full"
-Videos are rather low resolution
-No dates, and no update schedule
-Only blowjobs, nothing else at all |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like seeing cute girls gagging on cocks then check this one out. These girls do not look like are being forced into doing this, hell they seem eager to small that guy's dick against the back of their throat! Many sites with this niche have girls that seem like they are only doing it for the $500 they are getting and they can not wait to be done. The girls look good enough to be on many of the more popular sites.
The site is very small. Only 12 videos and a handful of small pictures. The videos account for 2.06 GB, so downloading in an hour is no big deal for many users. The video resolution is 320x240 but they do not look bad at all at 200% zoom. They are about 15 minutes a piece.
They list as giving access to other sites. They do, but they sites really are not anything worth accessing. They are streaming stuff that is not worth the time and can be found about anywhere.
The trial price of $2.83 is worth it if you like extremely hard blowjobs. There is not other sex styles here though. The normal price of $35 is extremely inflated for what you get here. If you are bored one day and want to join go with the trial since you will not need a month even on the old dial up modems!
Join for a day and enjoy watching girls throat bang so hard it will make YOUR throat hurt! |
|
07-07-08 05:38pm
Replies (2)
|
