| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
I had not noticed that the screwy word thing on the log in page did not work. This makes my life a little easier.
|
10-07-08 02:19pm
|
Reply
627
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Typically what gets people in trouble at work is someone physically seeing the screen and going for sexual harassment. No one wants that, so most of us keep the porn at home. Universities handle porn this way, besides they do not want to monitor web traffic anyway.
|
10-07-08 02:16pm
|
Reply
628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
This si really one of those things that it depends on where you are and how honest people are willing to be.
If you are talking to guys in a shop they will tell you most of the time. But, if you are in an office setting it can be a little more difficult to discuss simply because people are so worried about their image.
The point of this pole was to ask yourself if you would be willing to tell people openly. Obviously we all are pretty open here, but this is a completely different place. We all know that we all are into porn, plus well will likely never meet each other.
|
10-07-08 02:12pm
|
Reply
629
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pornhawk's Comment
I thought the site layout was pretty simple. That could be just me though. There is a lot of stuff here and it can be hard to puck where to start.
|
10-07-08 02:07pm
|
Review
630
|
Bukkake Pee
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Loads of pee here
-Decent amount of content
-Videos reasonable quality
-No DRM
-Some very good looking girls
-Most file names include model
-Access to network
-Many download and stream file type options
-Do not have to log in frequently |
| Cons: |
-Sites is pretty expensive at $35 for a month
-Older videos are not named well, newer ones are ok
-Older stuff is low resolution, to be expected though
-Must download videos in clips, usually 10 minutes each. No option for a single larger file.
-Videos can be very repetitive
-Many scenes have a handle full of guys but no intercourse
-Videos open a new page, even for downloading
-Navigation takes a minute to get used to |
| Bottom Line: |
Better bring a very large towel with you here! The site is about pee and they do not mess around, there is a lot of it.
The average scene is a girl peeing in a bowl then dumping on herself. Then a bunch of guys come in a pee all over her. After than they all jerk of and she blows them until they cum all over her.
It is all pretty random here. The only scripted parts are when they should pee, or get head and such. There is no organization for anything else. The site definitely has an amateur feel to it. The content itself and the presentation seems amateur. The camera bounces around a lot.
This is one of the larger sites on the network in actual size to download anyway. The site is 35.3 GB and has 239 video clips and has about 50 scenes. Each scene has four or so clips to it.
The quality of the videos is not bad. The average clip is about 150 MB or so and 7 to 10 minutes long. The bit rate goes up to 2300 KBit and at full scene look about like VHS. The videos are mostly 640 x 480. The older ones are half that.
The photos here are nothing special and are basically screen caps anyway. It is all about the videos.
In many of the scenes some of the pee can be pretty yellow. This may of may not bother you, but I prefer it to be clear. I also prefer lesbian pee scenes over scenes with guys. For me it is about where it comes from rather than what it is. There is some solo and lesbian peeing but it is vastly guy peeing on girl.
The sites gives access to a network of other sites, many of which feature peeing and fisting. If are into pee at all than this site should be worth considering because of the network access. You are bound to find a few scenes that do the trick for you. This is the only site here that features a group of guys peeing on one or two girls, many other sites have just one or two guys.
If you have a things for golden showers than the price would be worth it to you. |
|
10-07-08 02:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
631
|
Heavy Handfuls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I was a member there I while back, but I honestly can not remember too much about it.
|
10-06-08 06:14pm
|
Reply
632
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Mischif's Reply
It is pretty annoying. I have downloaded most of this network at this point. But the download limit have certainly done its job. It has cost me a lot more money to do so than would have been necessary.
|
10-05-08 11:52am
|
Reply
633
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
When I joined Hustler a while back, one of the very first site I joined, i got hit with this. It was just by chance that I found out that it had happened.
There really is no defense for this practice. It is just a to screw people over when they are all excited to join a site and do not read everything. Seriously though, if I wanted to join the other site they are offering wouldn't go to that site? Or, why not just give access to that site with the membership? Humm...I know....they get more money for nothing this way!
|
09-30-08 05:18pm
|
Reply
634
|
Cartoon 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
You do not seem to be having any luck with joining sites that you can download from lately!
How can a cartoon site, name cartoons, not have cartoons? Something seems seriously wrong here. Webmaster must have got his website names mixed up. He probably has a normal cartoon site named.... :)
|
09-29-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
635
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
First. It is likely that you can download the flash files, just have to know how.
Second. That is a simple way to make sure you have to keep paying for the site. It it is like renting a movie, and having to go back to the store every time you want to see the same movie.
Most of us want to download. It is so much easier to watch a movie from my hard drive than it is to stream it. Besides it looks better and frees up my bandwidth to download other things while watching. Being able to download is arguably the most important aspect of a website. I dont care how good it is if I cant get it.
Would you buy a DVD only to watch it right away and never watch it again? That is what streaming is to many of us. Plus, some people do not have connections capable of streaming HD, and most people have trouble if the are streaming and want to jump around a scene looking for what they like.
So you agree with restrictions of use? I suppose you agree with DRM as well? Perhaps censorship? With hard drives become more and more affordable it seems a waste to throw away download time to streaming. Do you use disposable plates every time you eat?
Maybe I going a little far with this, but one thing is clear. if a site does not feature things that 99.9% of site have, it should be known. Consider this. You bought a new cell phone and on the box it says "talk all day, never miss another call!" That would sound good, then you get it home ane realize it can only receive calls. The box said it can receive calls "never miss a call" but it can not send calls out. Now the box did not say it could send calls out, but why the hell would you look for that, every phone can do that!
|
09-29-08 06:46pm
|
Reply
636
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
Videobox and brazzers both offer Ipod and other portable media formats. The trick is that both of them also offer normal PC downloads. Site preview pages need to be clear. I understand what it is saying, but that may be because I already know before reading it. The site did not specifically say that it did not offer normal PC downloads and that is not normal for a website. Therefore, it needs to be made abundantly clear. They say what they are offering, but not what they are not. Normally this is not an issue, but this is not a normal site.
Again, I will have to back Cybertoad on this one. I am not saying that you are wrong for liking the site, I am just agreeing that his frustrations are valid and most PC users need to know of the issue.
FrancinedeeIpodPorn.com would be appropriate for this site. Then I would agree with you.
|
09-29-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
637
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
First. The review will not be pulled, in fact with will likely be rated as a 2 point.
Cybertoad is a fairly trust worthy guy here, I am sorry but I am going to take his word over yours.
How can a site claim it has HD video if it only runs at 320x112? That is clearly not HD. About any video would look sharp at that small of resolution, problem is that you would not sure if that was a dick or the leg of a table.
The site was not overly clear that there was on real PC downloads. This should be mentioned on an internet site.
|
09-29-08 03:56pm
|
Reply
638
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sounds like you just got screwed by a bunch of cell phone geeks! :)
Sorry to hear it. Sounds like the site name should say MOBILE in it. I would be a ton of pissed off too.
I guess you got screwed over by Newbie reviews. Notice how all of them have 1 point at most? And to think some people say some of us review TOO much. At least your review should set things straight.
|
09-29-08 03:41pm
|
Reply
639
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
Not it is not! It requires that i be at my computer the whole time. I usually use the point click method of adding things to my download manager anyway. I find this to be a better was because I only get one copy of everything and do not end up skipping stuff.
Really need to work on the files names, they absolutely suck! I can deal with it though. The bad part is that I notice that the links us a sort of time stamp that makes them expire after an hour or so. So no queuing a handful of videos up in my manager. Having to do extra work to rename everything is bad enough, but to have to do it more than once because the links expire is absolutely frustrating.
When I was at MC-Nudes a while back I had the same problem, as well as FTV and several other sites. So it is not only this this that is making life harder for paying customer, but a good handful of them.
Brazzers, Reality Kings, Aziani, InFocuGirls all expire a little while later. VideoBox gives you about a week. BangBros was nice since theirs did not seem to expire, Hungarian Honeys does not seem to either.
|
09-29-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
640
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
See. There is some good that comes from cucumbers!
|
09-29-08 03:02pm
|
Reply
641
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
At this point I have not been a member long enough to tell if they would make the links expire before the manager could get to them, it does not look like it though.
I big problem I have noticed is a lack of names for the files. "110947_dsl.wmv" just is not descriptive enough. They could at least have the girls name in it!
I should be able to tell you a little more tomorrow though. I will make sure to get back to you though, I assume you would want to know before the $18 deal expires.
|
09-28-08 10:26pm
|
Comment
642
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
09-28-08 08:28pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
643
|
Big Tits In Sports
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I guess I never noticed it.
|
09-26-08 05:11pm
|
Reply
644
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Reply
Gotcha. The ones on the preview page did not look so good, she should put a HD sample out there.
Hey. We were all new at everything we have ever don at one point. So do not think much of it. We all do things that are easy to criticizes after the fact. It is just a matter of being man enough to say "oh, duh that makes sense!"
Anyway, welcome to PU and keep coming back.
|
09-25-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
645
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
You kinda should have put this as a reply to the comment you are reply to. This way people do not wonder what you are talking about, or have to dig for the comment you are replying to.
I do have a question for you though. Is the quality in the site the same as seen in the preview videos?
|
09-25-08 09:04pm
|
Comment
646
|
Big Tits In Sports
(0)
|
|
09-25-08 03:00pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
647
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Haha. Dont worry, I am sure they will get it fixed for you. I am not a perfectionist, shown very easily by more porn collection organization. I have stuff scattered everywhere, although it is betting a little better. I guess I am usually more worried about getting my stuff to work right and when I see something little at a free site I do not put much worry on it. Of course if I had all my stuff in order I might be more willing to give others a hard time! :)
|
09-25-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
648
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I do not usually look to much at the scores. I feel that at times they are weighed one way or another too much by people who are biased either direction.
Hopefully he sees his name and says "hey thats me!" I guess it really is not a big deal though, I did not even know the feedback history page was there until you mentioned it.
Anyway, glad I could make it make sense for you.
|
09-25-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
649
|
School Girl Lapdance
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
WOW. Sounds like you go hosed on that one. When I looked at the preview page I though the site might command $10 and nearly shit myself when I seen $40. I think you wasted enough money to buy two memberships at better sites.
|
09-25-08 10:41am
|
Reply
650
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
This is something that perhaps you should talk to Khan about. The one review was a year old and thus does not count as much toward the final score. You are correct though, the feedback history page is not showing everything.
Here it is:
The old review is a year old, thus it counts as 25%
The newer review counts as 100% still
Newer review score times 4 plus the older review score and divide all by 5 since there is five parts to the score. Much like calculating a students GPA
95*4+90=470
470/5=94 ---the displayed score
I hope this helps a bit. They do need a line on the feedback page to count the number of older reviews.
|
09-25-08 10:37am
|
