| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
That would be great news indeed. Although I'm not much into tracking individual models, she is one of my favs and one of the few starlets who have managed to stay incredibly hot for years. If true, I'd be looking at heading back there in a few months once she starts adding content again.
|
02-12-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
752
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Hey Ace, sorry I think I forgot to mention the split vids as part of my earlier review on this site. Yeah, it's not really worth much except maybe for those who like pics and are willing to download one by one.
|
11-20-08 12:01pm
|
Review
753
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership |
| Cons: |
- No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries |
| Bottom Line: |
I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!
First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).
This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.
On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.
However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes". |
|
07-31-08 04:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
754
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
|
|
04-23-08 04:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
755
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I actually got burned on that one when I signed up a few months ago. I had a hell of time getting the stuff cancelled when I found out that they had "hidden" the cross sales below the transaction button. I should have noted that one in my review so good work in getting a comment posted on this devious practice.
|
03-22-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
756
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
See my reply to Exoticsforme under my Tastypass review for your answer.
|
09-24-08 06:13pm
|
Reply
757
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I joined through Bridesonblacks.com ($1 for 2 days). It was TBP listed offer and I haven't checked back to see if it was still open or not. Try loggin on through their.
I didn't really download anything from TastyTara so I can't advise as to what size the vids are coming in at now. The videos I saw were just fine (this was a full access trial so I assume the vids are the same as the regular fee, I don't think this site has enough technical prowess to offer different sized vids for different membership levels).
|
09-23-08 05:01pm
|
Review
758
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great TBP full trial prices ($1 for 2 days, $12.50 for a month)
- 8 network sites focusing on eastern euro girls plus some standard 3rd party feeds
- Large photos (up to 1400 x 920)
- Videos are generally of good quality but only average sized (450 x 335 at the highest end)
- No DRM
- Content pretty much exclusive but I did find a couple of sets that I had seen elsewhere |
| Cons: |
- Content is mostly average and only about 4 of the network sites are worth looking at
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No zips for photos
- Some advertising on some of the sites
- I had some issues with the billing company here but they were resolved
- Photo updates don't come very often and the sites update vids a few times per month |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, this isn't a bad network. I joined on the cheapo $1 for 2 days trial (you have to join an individual site, not the network to get this deal). I will note that going this route will result in a $40 monthly membership charge if you don't cancel (obviously this is where they're looking to make money). You also need to login under the heading "full membership", not "trial membership" on the login page. Why? I have no clue but this is how it worked.
When I went to cancel through the processing company (crmedialtd.com) they did not recognize my member info. I used the on-line chat function and got cancelled but my member info never appeared on the billing processor's site so this might be a red flag. Also, be aware that if you sign up for the trial, there are other "prechecked" trials on the bottom of the signup page; a nasty practice in my book.
Overall, the content wasn't bad. I found that I liked tasty18and19, bridesonblacks, and tastydildos the best. There are some solo model sites as well but exoticsforme pretty much covered them in his review so I won't delve into them here. Teensonblacks and the mature site were worthless. You also get access to 9 3rd party vido feed sites which are nonexclusive obviously.
Tasty18and19.com was pretty good with 77 photo sets and 82 movie sets with about 1/3 being hardcore. All photos were large, had small watermarks and were generally good quality. The girls were all pretty good looking. You also get access on this site to 420 streaming full lenght dvd's (nonexclusive) and 36 amateur girl vids (only downloadable in 2 minute clips). This site has the most content and most frequent updates of the network.
Bridesonblacks has no relationship to wedding day hookups. It's just an interracial site. They had about 30 photo sets and 60 vids. The newest photos were 1400x930 but about 2/3 were 1020x700. The girls ranged from young to mature. The photosets seemed to have stopped updating and the vids rarely update. I will note that all the vids can now be downloaded as full scenes. This site definitely had more of an amateur feel in terms of quality of the material.
Overall the quality was decent but certainly not high definition. Almost all the material is exclusive and the women are generally pretty good looking. I pretty much saw all I needed to on the 2 day trial but if you like the content the no zips will slow you down so the monthly $12.50 membership might be the way to go. Either way you go there isn't a lot of updating so there is no need to stay longer.
I'm scoring this a 77 because while the quality is decent there is not a ton of it and the updates don't come all that often on most sites. The billing processor problem/"gotcha" also counted against them here. It's a decent network but not the cream of the crop. |
|
09-19-08 05:56pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
759
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
They were fun but it took a lot (and I mean a lot) of time to put together and I just haven't had time to spare the last few years. Additionally, the "pickings" have dropped off quite a bit the last few years as the forum has really quieted down.
|
04-29-15 01:52pm
|
Reply
760
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Mmmm. Just cleaned out my cache and clicked on the TBP link for the $10 monthly trial and I just get a dead page link. Maybe something wrong with my browser or something else.
|
04-29-15 11:50am
|
Review
761
|
Team Skeet
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Over 1800 hundred scenes of mostly attractive younger gals getting their sexy on across a 20 site network.
+ No DRM or download limits.
+ Bills through Epoch, no prechecked cross sales.
+ Updates about 5 times a week.
+ Mostly exclusive content (LustHD and Rubateen sites are just 18xgirls / teenmegaworld content)
+ Good quality vids with good download speeds and multiple download options.
+ Newer vids have tag jumps where you can jump to a specific sex act while streaming. Video streaming works well and has several settings.
+ Navigation is basic but it works well. |
| Cons: |
- The listed TBP price of $9.87 doesn't apply, monthly price is about $18.
- Ads, ads, ads, ads. Ads everywhere.
- Not a picture site, max resolution is 1600x1000 and only goes back a few years.
- Production quality is just average and drops down to amateur on some sites.
- All vids pretty much labelled "HD" although the older content isn't.
- Some sites are dead or update sporadically. Most update 1 to 2 times a month.
- Nothing terribly unique or exciting about the content overall. A generic porn hub. |
| Bottom Line: |
You know you're getting old when I know the last time I visited a site now included in this network PU didn't exist and I was in the last days of a 56k connection. A bit of nostalgia got a hold of me and I decided to take a look again and was pretty much left feeling "meh".
This is a 20 site network with Innocenthigh and Xtrasmall being the two best sites. Perhaps by coincidence these two sites have most of the major porn stars on them too. The network feature mostly US porn stars and a mix of amateur or very short lived porn starlets and the main focus is on hardcore porn (really no anal for those so inclined). Here's the skinny:
PICS: Like I said, this isn't a pic network. Pics max at 1000x1600 but by mid 2013, drop to 1050x750. With sporadic updates, it doesn't take long before you've hit the low end on most sites. Lots of action from vids missing on pics and cropping leaves something to be desired. Several sites may only have a few dozen pics. Scenes that do have lots of pics mostly feature the preshoot tease pics. Not a lot to see here.
VIDS: All sorts of download options (WMV, MP4, HD and standard resolution) as well as different levels for in browser streaming. Download speeds were consistently good (about 3 MB/sec for me). The stream function worked well and I like the tag jump function. You get HD starts about late 2010, before that you have the old standard sized vids. Vids also have screencaps.
NAV: Navigation, although basic, works pretty well. No dead links, everything worked. Tags as usual can be a bit spotty but seem pretty consistent here. The best way to search is by site or by model. Only limited model info provided.
OVERALL: For whatever reason, I wasn't terribly impressed with the site overall. I don't use a DL manager and I was still able to look at and download everything I wanted in about 6 - 8 hours.
A very consistent theme is felt given that a lot of models appear on many of the sites. The POV sites, Teensdoporn and Shesnew sites all had an amateur level feel to them (low production value, spotty lighting and single cam, usually operated by the man). Even the more interesting sites had average production value and some questionable camera angles. There's nothing terrible about the site but, then again, nothing great either.
I see that Maggie just finished a review here giving the network a score of 90. That is definitely too high of score for what you get in comparison to other hardcore sites at that level. In my opinion it's decent network so that's what my score reflects. |
|
04-28-15 09:16pm
Replies (7)
|
Comment
762
|
Tear My Ass
(0)
|
|
03-24-08 12:01pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
763
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Good review on this one. I used to visit some of these sites years ago when they were relatively new and still had cheap trials. Although it sounds like they have a good amount of content now it seems like they're lacking on pic and vid sizes for the money. How was the Hell Cat site? I've seen some of her stuff on a tgp site I visit and she looks pretty tasty.
|
07-28-09 10:44pm
|
Reply
764
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me finish up here. I see that you changed the score on the site from "100" to "85" without adding any additional information to the review. Now, all that tells me is that you're just changing the score so you won't catch any more sh*t from others here. Now you're just being a hypocrite. Sorry if it seems like we are all jumping on you but you aren't starting off on a good footing here.
|
05-11-09 11:45am
|
Reply
765
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me start by saying welcome to PU. I see that you've been busy the last day or two posting comments and reviews. While I respect the right of people to say what they want here, you need to be doing a better job than what you are. For example, you gave this site a "100" score even when there are no hi rez pics or zips. I can assure you that this site does not merit a 100 score.
I understand that everyone has personal preferences (your love of anal sex has been made clear) but when it comes to review scores you need to be more objective and provide more information. For example; how many vids / photo scenes are there, what size are the vids and pics, how often does it update, what is the search function like, etc. Most of your comments and reviews to date lack this info and are merely statements regarding your personal preferences. That does not help others who might read your reviews and comments when trying to decide whether or not to join a site. My advice would be to read some of the reviews posted by long term members to get a feel for what we're looking for. Otherwise no one is going to take you seriously here and you're going to start getting a lot of negative trust ratings warning others that your reviews and comments need work.
|
05-08-09 03:23pm
|
Reply
766
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sounds like your sort of schizophrenic about this site; bashing it one month and falling back in love the next :) Any chance that you'll finally do a review on this place and put us all at ease over your variations on a theme ;)
|
08-19-09 05:37pm
|
Reply
767
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Review
768
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Freakin' huge amount of content
+ Good $20 TBP monthly membership
+ 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F)
+ Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum
+ No DRM
+ Supports download managers
+ Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks
+ Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive
+ Full tour available before joining |
| Cons: |
- Search function leaves a real nasty after taste
- More of a pic site than a video site
- Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between
- Quality varies
- "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds.
- Older material is mostly nonexclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography.
Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller.
Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around.
My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n".
The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it.
There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for.
Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot.
The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff.
This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times.
If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all. |
|
02-24-09 09:33pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
769
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sorry to hear about this. I was thinking of re-upping my membership since it's been about 18 months since I was last there. Sounds like they're cutting back to save a few bucks.
|
02-04-09 04:52pm
|
Reply
770
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
In the same vein as PinkPanthers query, I joined about 6 months ago and eventually got kicked off the site at the end of my membership because my membership "got hacked" too many times. I got repeated emails about hacking and they kept changing my password during my membership even though I was not constantly logging on and off, sharing my password info or had spyware on my computer. I thought that the customer support was pretty lousy as no one responded to my pleas. I've thought about rejoining sometime in the next few months but I'm wondering if the "password hacking" problem has been fixed there or not. This is the only site I've been to in recent memory that ever had that problem.
|
04-17-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
771
|
Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Agreed, I just browsed through the preview pages and saw lots of content from teenmegaworld. Still, if you haven't belonged to that site this does seem like a pretty good deal. I might try it for the "sex for grades" site they have.
|
10-09-11 02:32pm
|
Reply
772
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Bummsi's Comment
Welcome to PU Bummsi. I'm from the US so I may not be directly on point but you shouldn't have a problem joining a pay site here that's listed here at PU. All these sites must be compliant with age verification and record keeping. While these types of sites emphasize "young talent" you shouldn't have to worry about getting caught up with possessing underage porn or violating decency laws (at least here in North America and Western Eurpoe) when you join reputable pay sites.
Trust me when I say that there's a lot "harder" stuff out there than the content on Teenmegaworld and the Germans have a reputation for publishing a fair amount of the that hard stuff (BDSM, pissing, fisting, etc.). Some countries like the UK and the Ukraine have laws about what kinds of porn can be shot or produced in their countries I'm not aware of any Western European countries that ban the viewing or possession of the type of the stuff you're considering.
So, take the plunge and enjoy.
|
01-12-16 03:28pm
|
Reply
773
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Just wondering what the pics are like on the network and if most of the scenes have pics as well as vids.
|
08-19-10 03:27pm
|
Reply
774
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Great review, thanks for taking the leap and being the 1st PU'er to post a review. I thought it looked it pretty good so it's on my list of places to venture to in the future.
|
07-22-09 01:13pm
|
Reply
775
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
TeenModels's Reply
Sounds pretty sweet. Just curious, what are the other sites that members get bonus updates from?
|
06-25-09 01:02pm
|
