| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not to crush TheSquirrel like a piece of roadkill but I also voted for the status quo. Two days keeps it new and interesting. You can also go back and look at previous polls and add votes / comments later on (I sometimes do) so you still have access, you just have to make few more clicks of the mouse.
|
03-07-12 11:45am
|
Comment
202
|
AT Kingdom Network
(0)
|
|
02-28-12 12:44pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Cost, Content (original), & Reviews.
|
02-10-12 11:00am
|
Reply
204
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Hey Squirrel, good to see you back. Thought that you were run over or that you were keeping a low profile in hopes of getting named the new coach for the Brits National Football team. Great review as always.
|
02-09-12 12:06pm
|
Reply
205
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
My guess is that they're based overseas and depending on their exact location, filing a lawsuit is just dumping money down a black hole. Besides, all they have to do is change servers and reincorporate some place else and they're back in business the next day. Chasing down the bad guys can be a royal pain in the ass.
|
01-24-12 12:22pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As far as I can tell, there are really only 3 reasons for having DL limits:
1. Excuse not to upgrade technology / save costs. For sites, having a DL limit means they don't have to spend as much in server and bandwidth fees. I could see this being a reason for the small time players or newbies but not the large sites where we most often find limits.
2. DRM version 2.0. I think most sites figure if your downloading gigs per day then your just ripping their site of all content and that must mean you're up to no good (piracy, selling it to others, illegal tube posts, etc.).
3. We want more of your money. Having DL limits means if you really like the content then you're going to have stay around a while to get it all meaning more membership fees. Of course, if they had regular updates and good content that's usually reason enough for most people to buy a multi-month membership.
As you can see, I'm not terribly impressed by any of the reasons for limits. Thus, I'll continue my practice of avoiding these types of sites even though any reasonable DL limit would probably never apply to me because of fine and discriminating tastes in what I DL :)
|
01-11-12 11:17am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's one of those things that doesn't come up very often but if it turns out to be a negative experience for the customer (me) than I'll seriously think about it before signing up again regardless of how much I like the content.
|
01-09-12 11:51am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the time it's not done very well (as others have said). It can be good for solo shots where there is a decent striptease but most of the time it doesn't cut the mustard ... especially when your eating your hotdog on the 4th of July and come across one of these scenes in your archive.
|
12-19-11 03:49pm
|
Reply
209
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Hadn't heard about sites doing the whole "double thing" before. Sounds interesting in concept but, as you noted, not sure I really want to be dl'ing multiple copies of the same scene. It'd be kind of cool if some other sites (21stsextury or DDF) went this route though.
|
12-19-11 03:42pm
|
Reply
210
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
theonon's Review
Hey there and welcome to PU. Just as a heads up, you're probably going to catch from grief from some people for coming right out of the shoots and giving a site a perfect score. Also, if you could give more info the "bottom line" section as to why you felt this site was so great it would appreciated and more helpful to others who might look at your review in the future.
|
12-19-11 03:39pm
|
Reply
211
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say no. How is this different from phone sex only you get the visuals as well.
|
12-19-11 03:36pm
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Even though most countries will probably get stricter, they'll be stricter in name and lacking in enforcement. In the US I think you'll see fewer obscenity cases as prosecutors finally figure out you can watch a chick being sodomized with (insert your object of choice here) anywhere in the world with the click of a button and as people who have grown up with internet porn get older and actually consider voting as opposed to just wondering what the concept is.
|
12-16-11 03:43pm
|
Comment
213
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
|
11-29-11 04:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I've looked up about 3 or so. The only one I ever came across that could even be classified as decent was the Tommy Lee / Pam Anderson one. Frankly, I doubt anyone's sex life looks hot or interesting unless you're doing a porn shoot ... just wait until my hc vid hits the net.
|
11-18-11 08:48pm
|
Comment
215
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
|
11-04-11 12:33pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I said "other" because I've tried some of them but not all of them. Basically I learned that if you're messed up porn just ain't that interesting because your equipment is messed up or your brain ain't working, although the latter is a constant problem with me.
|
10-24-11 11:02am
|
Reply
217
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
In short, this site will probably give you what you're looking for. If you can't decide for sure, all of the sites under the DDF banner have an $8 two day full access trial if you want to test the waters.
As for makeup, you'll probably see a lot of that here (DDF does high end glamour porn) but it's generally not overdone. Otherwise, I think you'd be satisfied with the site given how much content they have (clips available on vids, some anal (depending on which sub-sites you join) and a good variety of stuff to ogle.
|
10-17-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I didn't know they existed either. I went back and looked at some but almost no commentary. I guess I'm just that damn good ... or else Khan and company actually have more important things to do (take your pick).
|
10-15-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
219
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
hiker's Review
Hey Hiker, glad to see a new face here at PU. Like a lot of us, we started posting after feeling that we got ripped off by a site. I'll just echo the comments from the previous reply, in that while you're experience may not have been good we always like more info so that others can make a fully informed decision.
|
10-12-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
DOESN'T IT MEAN THAT THEY'RE REALLY COOL LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!!!
|
10-12-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
221
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I would say that it's less than 90%, probably only about 60%. However, in my past experience they usually have the scenes first before the content starts to filter out to other websites as the months go by.
As an aside, the reviewers at TheBestPorn aren't collectors like us so they mainly rely on a websites description of "exclusive content" when they post their facts. Other PU reviewers may miss that as well. However, I don't usually have a beef when the majority of the content is exclusive like Karups.
|
10-12-11 01:49pm
|
Reply
222
|
Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Agreed, I just browsed through the preview pages and saw lots of content from teenmegaworld. Still, if you haven't belonged to that site this does seem like a pretty good deal. I might try it for the "sex for grades" site they have.
|
10-09-11 02:32pm
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Money, money, money. That's why most get into it. Most can't make a living doing it. Money is also why you see some former stars suddenly come back. I'm still looking for definitive proof that is does make the world go 'round.
|
10-09-11 02:27pm
|
Reply
224
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Thanks for doing a detailed review on this one. I've been thinking about it and it looks like I'll hang to my bucks for a while before signing up.
|
10-04-11 05:38pm
|
Reply
225
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I know, now. Just after I posted this comment I looked back at the TBP page on this site and saw the disclaimer as a limited trial. Sorry, just didn't read ... or least my brain refused to comprehend. You can scrap my original comment and these replies if you want.
|
10-04-11 12:22pm
|
