| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
Personally I would like to see more DRM, fewer updates, more expensive sites, more guys and production staff talking during vids, smaller pics and ISP's and sites charging by the kb for every single download .... oh wait, nevermind, I was applying the 2007 US investment banker economic model to my analysis.
|
01-15-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Since this is my poll I guess I should post something here ;) Like most, I'd probably still be into it regardless of what others say. In my opinion it would make it a bit more fun because it wouldn't be such a taboo subject to bring up with friends and the like.
|
01-13-09 03:28pm
|
Reply
578
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
I was trolling for new sites to hit and found that 18yearsold (part of the network) is available along with 5 other sites for $18 on a TBP offer. The TBP stats say there are no hi rez pics so I was wondering if the hi rez pics you noted apply throughout the site (including 18yearsold) or just on some sites and roughly how far back in time the high rez pics go back to. Thanks.
|
01-13-09 03:24pm
|
Comment
579
|
Anal Stretched
(0)
|
|
01-13-09 12:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Wow, it must be true. There really is nothing to do in Canada ;)
|
01-06-09 10:31pm
|
Reply
581
|
Swank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I've sort of avoided this site because they use mostly nonexclusive material from what I've seen on tgp sites and the tour. This makes me even less likely to sign up.
|
01-06-09 05:31pm
|
Reply
582
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Review
Thanks for doing a review on this one. I'd been thinking about it but wasn't ready to take the leap without some substantive review coming out. Just curious as to what pixel sizes the photos come in and if the photo sets have zips. Thanks.
|
01-04-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It varies a lot but as a matter of caution I try to cancel at least one week before expiration on a monthly and ASAP on trials. I just want to make sure that the cancellation gets processed and acknowledged before the rebill cycle. So far this has never let me down.
|
01-04-09 05:26pm
|
Reply
584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I'm a cheap bastard so price takes the top priority. After that comes reviews and then DRM or download limits. Part of the nice thing about a pic guy is that the download limits and DRM don't really affect me much.
|
01-02-09 10:35pm
|
Reply
585
|
Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
I just stuck my own review of the network up on this site (the Reality Pass HD) earlier today. You must have gotten better speeds because I was only getting about 150 to 160 kb/sec which was sort of a killer for me. Agreed that Mandy is cute but overall I felt the network needed some help. If they could beef up their search function and download speeds this could be a pretty decent site.
|
01-02-09 10:25pm
|
Reply
586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Apparently this one might have been made in reaction to me since I pretty much change weekly. Of course I answered "NO". It's just another fun part of the forum so no harm no foul. I agree with the ban on animated avatars since those can get annoying but otherwise everything else seems fine.
|
01-01-09 09:29pm
|
Reply
587
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
Just echoing what TheRizzo said. It's been a while since I joined but I can say that there was minimal overlap and that both sites are pretty good in my book.
|
12-29-08 10:58pm
|
Comment
588
|
Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)
|
|
12-29-08 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
589
|
Reality Pass HD
(0)
|
|
12-29-08 10:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
590
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
Just to let you know they are the same thing. They just use the two names as part of a marketing operation. As for pricing, welcome to the newest porn trend of regional pricing. Being from the states I can't say if you're stuck shelling out 20 pounds or not. I recently got a deal for $10 a month by linking through another site. Good luck hunting down a deal. You might also consider looking for a deal on Mofos.com. That is the newest brazzer's network. It's small at this time but you might find some deals on it. Good luck.
|
12-29-08 11:54am
|
Reply
591
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ooops, sorry I didn't read that one closer. Thanks though for following up on this for me. PU/TBP comes through again with some of the best customer service on the web.
|
12-28-08 12:34pm
|
Reply
592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I haven't bought a skin mag in over a decade at this point. Why spend the $$ on it when for the same price you can get a website membership with a hell of a lot more content.
The sad part about the demise of the skin mag is/will be the little extras like the stupid yet funny "Letters to Penthouse", the cartoons, and some of the articles. In other words, the overall entertainment content of the mags is now being replaced by the more one dimensional world of downloads. I'm not complaining but it's just another aspect of life that's disappearing.
|
12-27-08 12:51pm
|
Comment
593
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
|
12-26-08 10:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
594
|
Her First Anal Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
This is one I'd stay away from. They are part of the "usual suspects" lineup of 3rd party content that appear as bonus sites on a lot of other sites. From what I've seen on their bonus offerings the quality isn't that hot (clips only and smallish pics) and neither are the chicks. I've gotten a few keeper sets but nothing that could reasonably amount to an interest in actually joining the site.
|
12-26-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
595
|
Cum Fiesta
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Review
It's a decent network but what just cheeses me off is their lack of interest in photos. 800x600? If it's 1998 that's fine but not any more. They do have an unbeatable backlog of vids to choose from though which is attractive.
|
12-23-08 03:39pm
|
Reply
596
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
I'm currently a Brazzer's member and have seen all the hype they've been pushing on Mofos. From looking at the tour it basically just looks like a Brazzer's clone in terms of quality (aka - average at best). Apparently they're just trying to up their revenue streams by pushing another network you have to pay for. Frankly, they should just raise their price on the Brazzer's site and add more content but maybe their bean counters figured that this route would create more money overall. I think I'm sort of done with Brazzer's so the new offerings don't tempt me too much.
|
12-23-08 03:36pm
|
Reply
597
|
Indecent Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this Denner. I also saw the TBP trial and was thinking about joining; maybe I'll reconsider. How is the picture quality on the sites there?
|
12-23-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Weeeeeee! I'll be the spoiler and say "maybe". Has Wittyguy been drinking too much eggnog you ask? No, I'm mainly about the pictures. If they have good sized and good quality pics in a genre that I like then I would definitely give consideration to joining even with vids being stream only.
Basically these poll results validates my point (and others certainly) that stream is/will become the next DRM alternative.
|
12-23-08 03:23pm
|
Reply
599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
Basically, all of the above can be a royal pain if they are overdone. On the other hand, if the tats or boob jobs are subtle or well done they don't really take anything away from the experience for me. Moderation is OK, over the top is just a mess.
I agree with Drooler in that some of these chicks go way overboard with the tats. What happens when they're 40, have stretch marks, faded tats and big ol' "ass antlers" that would make the most perverted teenaged boy loser cringe?
|
12-21-08 12:31pm
|
Comment
600
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-20-08 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
