Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Wittyguy (0)

Feedback:   All (830)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (682) Other:   Replies Received (431)  |   Trust Ratings (1) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 276-300 of 838 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Reply 276 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll It does depend. If its a network, I would expect daily updates. If its a stand alone site, then a few times a week. A solo site? That should be several times a week too. You also have to be wary if they include recycled or old nonexclusive material as "updates" too. 06-14-10  11:56am Reply 277 N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll I'm putting all money on North Korea to win it all ;) 06-02-10  12:51pm Reply 278 Third Movies (0) Reply of exotics4me's Review Thanks for kicking out a review on this one. I've been casually eying it but have been holding back waiting for a review. I'll probably put this one in my list. 06-01-10  11:20am Comment 279 Velvet Mag (0) Nonexclusive Content Granted, the TBP folks look at a lot of porn sites and they don't collect porn like most of us do so they're not always on top of sites that make claims about exclusive content. However today's TBP review score of 81 is misplaced in my book. It is unfortunate when a review basically seems to read like something ripped from the site's marketing department: "All of the material on Velvet Mag is original. They shot it all and you won't find it anywhere other than the hard copies of their magazines." NOT! I joined this site (see my Swankpass review) last year and found it loaded with nonexclusive content. These magazine sites usually claim "exclusivity" on the fact that they may have had the original publication rights to these scenes but the stuff is so old and has been on so many web sites that it becomes meaningless. Looking at the very limited tour pages on this site today (bad sign) it looks like mostly old stuff to me, same as last year. At $20 a month, you'd get more enjoyment out of buying the "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" collectors set DVD than this place. 05-31-10  11:39am Replies (0) Reply 280 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll I read the outdated reviews most of the time but usually to read reviews from the people I know and respect. A bunch of short reviews from one and done PUers isn't nearly as informative as an old review from someone who's been around for a while. Besides, rarely do sites change that much after a year or two. 05-31-10  11:16am Reply 281 N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll I have broadband which well exceeds 800 kbs but it is mostly wasted when it comes to porn. Rarely do I find sites that hit more than 600 to 700 kbs so I'm probably paying for too much speed but there really isn't an affordable middle ground where I live. 05-29-10  12:49pm Reply 282 Porn Fidelity (0) Reply of ace of aces's Reply I hope to kick out a new review next week or the following, haven't joined a new site in a while so my good intentions have been on hold. 05-28-10  12:26pm Reply 283 Futanaria (0) Reply of Gazette Risque's Review Just wanted to say very good review there. 05-27-10  11:59am Reply 284 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll So long as there is some country where porn remains legal and where servers can pump out the x-rated digitized 1's and 0's we covet, there will be porn to be found on the internet. Given the fact that child porn has proven so hard to stamp out with the technology we have it would be almost impossible to snuff all porn even if it were illegal. 05-27-10  11:57am Reply 285 N/A Reply of graymane's Poll Other than looking for prechecked stuff I don't pay any attention to them. I figure that if I run into problems I can bitch about it here and by trying to contact the site or cancel my membership and, if I have to, dispute the charges (I've never been fought by a website the few times I've had to do this). Raising a stink usually changes the rules if the website cares at all. If they don't, they usually don't fight over a single membership fee. 05-25-10  01:03pm Comment 286 1 By Day (0) $7 Full Access Trial I was just surfing through some stuff at TBP and noticed that this site has a $7, 2 day full access trial (the 2 day trial is $10 for the full 10 site DDF network). In fact all the individual DDF sites seem to be running this trial. If you've been to this site before and don't need or want everything, then this should give you ample time to fire up your DL manager and grab what you want. It might be a bit much to grab the whole site over 2 days but there you go ... and know you know. 05-19-10  12:32pm Replies (0) Reply 287 Porn Fidelity (0) Reply of ace of aces's Review I like that you did the +++ and --- to highlight really good and bad parts of the site. I'll being doing this on my next reviews and hope more people start using this system to. 05-19-10  11:38am Reply 288 N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll I also opted for the "corndog route", conjuring memories up of those almost digestible things they served at school lunch. Does wanting a phallic shaped meat by-product after watching porn indicate deeper problems with my mother ....? 05-17-10  03:56pm Reply 289 N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll I've been holding back on ever watching from tv. For one, my tv ain't that great. Second, I'm afraid that if I do start watching on the ultimate "boob tube" that I'm just going to want more and find myself filling up more hard drives of stuff because I'll want the highest possible quality vids. Ignorance is bliss for me ... for now. 05-17-10  03:52pm Comment 290 Club Sandy (0) Needs Some Work As I slowly work my way through the 21st Sextury sites this one left me feeling somewhat disappointed. Last time I was here (probably 4 years ago) I thought the models were great and there was a good mix of hard/softcore going on. This time around things seem to have slipped in my book. First, they keep insisting on using the split sets making grabbing them and getting a single vid out of it a pain. Second, WTF is up with the microscopic thumbnails in the photo galleries? They say that rubbing the stump can lead to vision impairment but I don't think I need an electron microscope to get around in the everyday world. Third, slow download speeds: I'm rarely cracking 100kbs on this site. Fourth, the models seem to have slipped. Still some prime booty but more average booty seems to be making it's way into their trunk with too much junk. Fifth, like a lot of the network sites, the tags on the scenes make the search engine pointless. On other sites its doable, here with over 1300 scenes its a pain in the ass. Sixth, some of the navigation tools (like the page jumps) don't work or don't work well. Seventh, some vids just won't download properly (only a few I've found so far but still annoying). Time to tighten up and clean up the ship on this site. If this were a review I'd only give Sandy a low 80's score on this site. Sorry babe. 05-13-10  02:18pm Replies (0) Reply 291 N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll Likewise, I've never actually looked at it before today. After looking at I can safely say that I don't think I need to look at it again until next year. 05-13-10  11:13am Reply 292 N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll Why wasn't gay or ladyboy porn on the list, I think that would freak someones gal out the most ... followed closely by S&M and defacation if shes not into that. As for Drooler's reply, wasn't "Piss and Scat" originally developed by Ella Fitzgerald? 05-12-10  01:04pm Reply 293 21Sextury.com (0) Reply of BadMrFrosty's Comment I'll second your opinion. The last day or two I've been trying to DL some stuff from Analteenangels and the site has been moving like molasses, with pages and vids sometimes not even loading. The speeds also vary a lot depending on the time of day (night works best for me). I think the network has never been fully "networked", simply patching sites together on the pre-existing platforms which is too bad for the consumer. I'm also guessing that they've had more subscribers with their reduction in price which is making things worse in terms of speed. 05-12-10  01:01pm Reply 294 21Sextury.com (0) Reply of slutty's Reply I'll check it out -- I haven't dug much at all into Sophie or Mia yet. 05-07-10  05:13pm Reply 295 21Sextury.com (0) Reply of slutty's Comment Just curious what site(s) you're having problems with the downloads? I haven't come across any DL blocks / problems so far in my multi-month membership. 05-07-10  12:35pm Reply 296 Woodman Casting X (0) Reply of pat362's Review I used to enjoy some of his stuff too. Just wondering if there are any pic sets on the site (and what size they are) if its all/mostly vids? 05-03-10  12:20pm Reply 297 N/A Reply of Goldfish's Poll I have to say Europe simply because you see lots of natural hot looking girls. I think porn is more of a "temp job" for those girls so they don't feel the need to get the boob jobs (they probably couldn't afford them anyway). 05-03-10  12:18pm Reply 298 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll Does you and the hardcore couple on your computer screen count as a three way? 04-29-10  03:02pm Comment 299 Cuties Galore (0) What Denner Wants, Denner Gets .... Denner posted a previous comment asking what this site was like and, like "The Dude", I abide and oblige. This really doesn't merit a full review since it's a growing site on the 21st Sextury network and the TBP review pretty much lays out the site technical specs. Currently, there are 105 scenes available. All have the standard one size fits all pic sizes of 1280x850. The vids are mixed. Some max out at 1900x1080 while most only go 1280x850. New or old, it's all over the board. Same with streams, some have options while others are one bandwidth fits all. There is no music in any of the vids I looked at and no camera dudes groping the models. If you like the girls on Lezcuties then you'll like this site because a lot of the girls who appear there show up here. Only here its all solo work with almost every scene involving dildo play. I can count on one hand (I know that shocks some people) the number of scenes not involving toys. The production is all high quality and not a lot of these girls appear outside of this network from what I can tell but then I don't track many of the softcore girls that much. The girls all pretty cute, mostly thin and fall into the teenager and early 20's age range. To the extent this is a solo site it varies from the usual network options. I wouldn't recommend joining the network just to get this site; I do recommend joining the network though. If you like the overall network content then you'll probably like this stuff too. If I were reviewing it I'd score it in the low 80's without considering the network as a whole. 04-27-10  05:46pm Replies (0) Reply 300 N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll The "grass is always greener" until you get there ... and find it's full of crabs. 04-27-10  04:18pm Shown : 276-300 of 838 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.39 seconds.