| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I think most of the high profile models who seem to keep up do it with the help of other companies/producers (Club Nella, Club Sandy, Eve Angel etc. get a lot of support help and casting with other models). I could see where doing it one your own would become a major pain but if you want the revenue you have to keep it up -- the fans of individual models expect more than what they get from the mega sites.
|
06-06-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
752
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I hear ya brother. If you've ever bought any of their magazines or vids you'll see that they come with about 5 or 6 languages in/on them plus they have eastern european versions of the same stuff. They started out as a magazine and video company and that is their niche as I believe they are still the biggest in Europe. Apparently there are still a lot of noninternet consumers willing to shell out big $$ for their stuff because they wouldn't be making it off of the internet alone.
|
06-06-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
753
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I think most hardcore creationists put the "birth of time" somewhere around 4 to 5 thousand B.C. Taking that view at least ends the discussion about whether cavemen drew caveporn ;)
|
06-06-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Help, I've gone blind!!!! But seriously, I do believe that masturbation is considered healthy for older men as it keeps the blood flow going down there. I also believe that men who've undergone prostate surgery are advised to "use it or lose it" so speak. Keep on wankin'.
|
06-06-08 12:59pm
|
Reply
755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I like the thingsyoungerthanmccain.com. If you were a creationist, couldn't you list "the universe" as well?
|
06-05-08 05:27pm
|
Review
756
|
NS All Access
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each)
- Exclusive content
- Good TBP discount price of $15 month
- Access to 14 sites and some bonus material
- No DRM
- Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps |
| Cons: |
- Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set
- Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps
- Navigation needs work
- Site gets repetitive
- Some sites have stopped updating |
| Bottom Line: |
I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack.
The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies.
For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network.
I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough.
The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models.
If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality. |
|
06-05-08 05:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
757
|
18 Virgin Sex
(0)
|
|
06-05-08 12:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
758
|
Private.com
(0)
|
|
06-04-08 12:49pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I almost never hear about porn sites from non on-line resources so that's pretty much a no-go for me. Otherwise, if the site sounds cool, I'll check it out.
|
06-04-08 11:53am
|
Reply
760
|
Adult Friend Finder
(0)
|
Reply of
m341ehw's Review
I always wondered how much of a ripoff this site was since it seems to be all over the net. Not interested in joining initially the reviews here seem to confirm my suspicions that it's basically a spam trap.
|
06-03-08 04:06pm
|
Reply
761
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
aesop7's Review
I've been thinking about joining this site and was wondering how much hardcore content there is? Appreciated if you could let me know. Thanks for the review.
|
06-03-08 04:00pm
|
Reply
762
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Very good review here, keep it up. It seems like a lot of these single model sites are just not keeping up. The actress seems to get into it for a little while, usually just after the launch, and then let it languish.
|
06-03-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
763
|
DL Assistant
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Thanks for the review here. I've seen some of the crystal lizard stuff on tgp sites and wondered how good the content was (I realize crystal and diamond lizard are 2 separate entities). Good review.
|
06-03-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
764
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I usually choose "satisfied customer" or "did not like quality" options. If they give you room to add your own explanation I usually try and say why if I was not happy with the site but I doubt that the webmasters take those replies into consideration very much.
|
06-03-08 03:18pm
|
Reply
765
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
McCain if for no other reason than the fact that he has said that he would appoint conservative judges who are more likely to restrict porn access.
|
06-03-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I'm with Badandy here. If you ever been to a nude beach you know that the "eye candy" is pretty harsh for the most part. Who wants to see 60 year old hippy grandmas flashing their air bags.
|
06-03-08 03:10pm
|
Reply
767
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ClownPrince's Review
I believe that I was a member there years ago. I think they had a few pics back then but they were pretty pathetic. Overall, I didn't keep any of the material from then. Sounds like not much has changed which is a shame given the quantity of material that Anabolic put/s out. Yet again another prodcution that really hasn't made the leap to the internet which puzzles me since they are losing out a on a lot of potential revenue.
|
06-03-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
768
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
There's a PU forum discussion thread on this subject if you want to contribute.
|
06-02-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
769
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted undecided. Since I'm all for equal rights I figure that women should be allowed to go topless only so long as the heavy duty guys start wearing "manziers".
|
06-02-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I believe that it is the website "allover30.com". It's posted in his tag line if you read his forum posts.
|
05-30-08 04:45pm
|
Review
771
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
772
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
When I was a member I thought that this site probably was the best, or at least in the top 3, of the Brazzer sites. For me, the Brazzers had too much silicone for my taste (a lot of those women have more computing power in their chest than a Cray supercomputer).
For me, I guess I want to make sure that sites grow for a while before giving them a high score. Sometimes they just stop updating even though the overall quality may be good. This is unlikely to happen on the Brazzer's network but ya' never know.
Overall, I generally agree with your assessment and reply.
|
05-29-08 05:45pm
|
Reply
773
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
That's true, I guess I do leave feedback on the cancel page but I wonder if any of the webmasters actually look at those remarks.
|
05-29-08 05:32pm
|
Reply
774
|
Oye Loca
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one. I hate the misleading tours and previews on sites and encourage everyone to post them in their reviews or comments.
|
05-29-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
775
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Comment
I've been eying this site for a while and will probably check it out soon. It does seem like the rating might be a bit low but I've had my own beefs with TBP about some of their ratings. The best revenge, so to speak, is to get your own review posted in the near future.
|
05-29-08 12:15pm
|
