| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm all for that one my man, all for it. I've noticed that we don't seem to be getting as many poll submissions from users any more, probably because most of the easy ones have already been done. I think it might be worth a carrot; meaning up to one raffle ticket for a poll idea. Don't know though, maybe the PU staff has a boat load of poll ideas but I sort of doubt it. You should send an email to the PU staff about that one unless Khan wants to post a reply here.
|
08-11-08 11:48am
|
Comment
677
|
24 Main Street
(0)
|
|
08-07-08 09:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
678
|
Parental Secrets
(0)
|
|
08-07-08 08:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
679
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Apparently I am the anti-Denner. I'm proud to say that no one has won less money with more raffle tickets than me. Damn the statistics and full engines ahead.
p.s. My lack of success at the raffle isn't what motivated me (or would motivate me) to get forum posts counted towards the raffle.
|
08-07-08 11:58am
|
Reply
680
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I thought I'd toss this out as a poll question since, I've been told, the PU staff has taken the idea under consideration for a while now. I'm sort of mixed on this one. In one way it rewards people who actively post and contribute to the site. While the original purpose of PU was for site reviews and comments I don't see any harm in expanding the "rewards program" to include others who may find the forum more interesting. In my view, the more participants here the better off the PU community is and forum offers a different place for people to give their input.
On the other hand, as one of the top forum posters, I don't want to see the forum get loaded up with junk either.
I like Atrapat's idea of including forum posts as "replies" for purposes of earning raffle tickets that way. Realistically, a reply doesn't really have to have any substance to it to count towards the raffle (this addresses Apoctom's issue about quality control - besides Khan does monitor the forum). I'm thinking this might be the way to go.
|
08-07-08 11:50am
|
Reply
681
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you were interested in gay porn, or bisexual porn, I think there would be better sites to satisfy your wants than b/g gangbang sites. Maybe some of the closet women porn viewers or women who come across their hubbies stash might view it with a different eye but for most of us pervs it's about the babes.
|
08-05-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
682
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
That's cool. I went back and read your review on DP Overload after I posted my reply so I understand a bit better the goings on here. Thanks for clarifying the situation.
|
08-05-08 11:18am
|
Reply
683
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
So, just to make clear, the admin staff at 21st Sextury gave you free access based upon your review? If so, doesn't it seem like they're trying to "buy" a good review from you?
|
08-05-08 10:56am
|
Reply
684
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
On the main page, go the forum button on the right hand side (navigation bar) on the main page. The forum thread will be (or at least last was) on page 2 of the forum threads. Log in and post your comment.
|
08-04-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
685
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Comment
Hey Lurifax, welcome to PU. Just as a suggestion, there is a thread in the forum titled "Sites that Charge More in Eur than US". You might want to post this issue there so more people become aware of ccbills current practices.
|
08-04-08 12:50pm
|
Reply
686
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What strikes me as curious is why more celebs don't release sex tapes. Come on, there's a whole parade of child stars who turned into washed up adults living off of basically nothing because they blew it all. If you got nothing, including a career, why not churn out a sex tape claim some one stole it and make some money off the thing. It beats flipping burgers.
|
08-04-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
687
|
X Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Just wanted to say good review here. I took the tour and it looks promising but I think I'll wait for it to grow (hopefully it will) before shelling out $30 a month.
|
08-01-08 06:24pm
|
Reply
688
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Typically I don't really do anything because most lopsided reviews tend to come from people who put very little into that review or have done very few reviews. For members who have been around and typically write good reviews I sometimes reply to the review and ask why they rated a site like they did (only when I know something about the site they're rating).
I tend not to do this too much because the impression I've gotten, even though my questions are merely seeking to clarify and not accuse, is that people get a bit defensive when challenged about their score. I've haven't really been questioned yet on a score I've given so I'm not entirely sure how I'd feel about it.
Another way I respond is if I like the person's reviews but think they're scoring too high I leave a comment with my trust vote letting them know.
As an aside, I got inspired to propose this poll through some replies with Exoticsforme. There's a new thread in the forum now about scoring/ratings sites -- https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=172.
|
08-01-08 11:48am
|
Comment
689
|
Lover Pass
(0)
|
|
07-31-08 08:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
690
|
Dads and Babe
(0)
|
|
07-31-08 08:16pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
691
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership |
| Cons: |
- No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries |
| Bottom Line: |
I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!
First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).
This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.
On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.
However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes". |
|
07-31-08 04:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
692
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I recently finished a membership at Handsonhardcore and noticed that there was a lot of "remastering" going on there as well. I think it's due in part to the fact that most porn surfers haven't been around all that long and will think it's new and in part saving production money while keeping the updates flowing.
|
07-31-08 11:44am
|
Reply
693
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Hillarious (and very good) review there Drooler. $25 for one darkly lit nude scene? Makes me think there is still hope for my pseudo on line pornstar dreams ... $25 a month to see some average mostly clothed white guy staring at his computer and downloading actual nude porn. Seems like a bargain in comparison to this site.
|
07-28-08 11:57am
|
Reply
694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
God yes I'm of those Luddites who still uses IE as their main browser. I usually just look at the pics before deciding whether to zip them or not so it's not too big of deal to have automatic image reisizing (a quick mouse click and the full image comes back). As for "smart image dithering" I have no clue what that is. Is it related to smart image dallying :-) ?
|
07-28-08 11:40am
|
Reply
695
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
chaos75's Review
I belonged there about 2 years ago, sorry to hear that they've added DRM to their package. I always thought the pics were better than the movies because, like you've said, the scenes are pretty much the same and the pics were decent sized. Sounds like not much has changed.
|
07-27-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
696
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I think when it comes to the hardcore material, which is what I'm primarily interested in, the sets seem to be mostly duplicates from what can be seen on other sites. I do believe that there is some exclusivity but not enough. Also, I think some of the stuff that appears to be exclusive on their site tends to show up later on some of the other mega sites.
Like I mentioned Blue Fantasies is not a clone but it is total softcore glamour. Naughtystaff is a new addition and mostly exclusive but with only 12 sets so far its not big enough to justify joining at this point.
For me, Sexy-babes and it's network is superior but that's just one humble chimps opinion.
|
07-27-08 07:42pm
|
Reply
697
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I'd have to say that Monahan's description of the zips is pretty much accurate. It's a pain because they aren't very well described but I tend to rename them or edit my zips so, for me, it's not that big of deal.
|
07-27-08 07:38pm
|
Review
698
|
Twistys
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day |
| Cons: |
- Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.
There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.
I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.
The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.
Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon |
|
07-25-08 05:07pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
699
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with most here by defining it as V & A. I would also expand the definition to include toys in the V & A as well.
|
07-24-08 12:39pm
|
Comment
700
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
|
07-24-08 12:36pm
Replies (0)
|
