| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yeah, the dudes on the preview page are pretty over the top in comparison to the girls who are only mostly over the top :) If this type of animation gets better and they can start making movies the only job pornstars are going to have is doing the 'screaming O' voice overs while leaving us pervs with a completely warped sense of reality.
|
05-14-09 11:40am
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Not sure how to answer this one because I don't believe that I have but websites have told me otherwise on occasion.
I have joined several sites in the past where I've gotten blocked for allegedly password sharing or other evil deeds but that was a problem on their end of things, not mine. Some sites seem to have a history of problems with this and I'm not sure why that is. I suppose someone could have randomly hacked in using my password and the like but I find that unlikely because I use unlikely spellings and characters in my passwords. I'm spyware free and my antivirus is up to date so I don't know what to think about this one.
|
05-14-09 12:22am
|
Comment
428
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
|
05-14-09 12:14am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
429
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
That's good to know. I haven't been a member there in years because they jacked the price. Looks like I'll have to put it back on my list of places to check out again.
|
05-13-09 11:39pm
|
Review
430
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ 13 network site
+ Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Good mix of Euro and American babes
+ Good action and professional quality shoots
+ Good download speeds on vids
+ No DRM or download limits. |
| Cons: |
- Cross sales on sign-up page
- A lot more action in the vids than the pics
- Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics
- Search is OK but could be better
- Each site in network updates 2x per month
- A few deadlinks and pics that don't load |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases.
Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files.
Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot.
There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good.
There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning.
Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal. |
|
05-13-09 11:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
431
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me finish up here. I see that you changed the score on the site from "100" to "85" without adding any additional information to the review. Now, all that tells me is that you're just changing the score so you won't catch any more sh*t from others here. Now you're just being a hypocrite. Sorry if it seems like we are all jumping on you but you aren't starting off on a good footing here.
|
05-11-09 11:45am
|
Reply
432
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
As some have mentioned, this site is definitely more on the artsy side rather than the erotic. If Met-Art branched out and did some shoots with toys and actual lesbianism it would score out at a 98 on a review for me. While the girls are amazing and there's tons to see it's just a tad too softcore for my long term viewing tastes despite my love of pictures over videos.
|
05-11-09 11:41am
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
This one got some treatment in the forum if you want to read more about it: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=119.
|
05-11-09 11:37am
|
Reply
434
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Dmander6's Review
Let me start by saying welcome to PU. I see that you've been busy the last day or two posting comments and reviews. While I respect the right of people to say what they want here, you need to be doing a better job than what you are. For example, you gave this site a "100" score even when there are no hi rez pics or zips. I can assure you that this site does not merit a 100 score.
I understand that everyone has personal preferences (your love of anal sex has been made clear) but when it comes to review scores you need to be more objective and provide more information. For example; how many vids / photo scenes are there, what size are the vids and pics, how often does it update, what is the search function like, etc. Most of your comments and reviews to date lack this info and are merely statements regarding your personal preferences. That does not help others who might read your reviews and comments when trying to decide whether or not to join a site. My advice would be to read some of the reviews posted by long term members to get a feel for what we're looking for. Otherwise no one is going to take you seriously here and you're going to start getting a lot of negative trust ratings warning others that your reviews and comments need work.
|
05-08-09 03:23pm
|
Reply
435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Reading this sort of made me think about how porn has evolved/devolved over the years. Heck, even a decade ago this was something rarely seen. Now, if you got a MFF thing going it's almost standard operating procedure. At this point, it's more of a gimmick for me so I'm pretty much indifferent.
|
05-08-09 11:34am
|
Review
436
|
Brandi Love
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Good price (7 day full access trial for $10)
+ Decent amount of content (about 100 pic sets, 100 vids and 25 webcam shows)
+ Hot MILF with great legs and tight bootie who covers the whole range of porn
+ Weekly live webcam
+ All vids and cam shows have description of what happens |
| Cons: |
- Cross sales on signup page
- No zips on pic sets
- No update schedule and unsure how often it really does update
- Video quality average at best
- Navigation needs work
- Lots of advertising and cross promotions |
| Bottom Line: |
I usually avoid single model sites but decided to chance it here with Brandi and her banging hot bod. Brandi is an amateur MILF in late 30's early 40's who has a fitness body that most men wish their wife or GF had. She covers the whole gambit on her site, from HC to lez to fetish to swinger to toys to uniform to glam .... She does put a lot of time into her site but overall the site needs some work.
Pics: This is where the navigation sucks. She has a pic page with about 10 different categories. However, clicking on a category takes you into the same big archieve that you have to page through. Just one thumbnail to show what it's in the gallery so you have to look at each one to see what's really there. No page jumps, just forward and backward. No zips either. Pic sizes are all over the board from worthless and tiny screen caps to 2300x3500 in your face puntang depending on the set (you don't know until you click). Most of the pics are of good quality but I wish there was more for each set. You get at most 100 in a set and often only about half that. Some sets are continuations of earlier sets but that's not really clear until you get into them. Cropping is not one of her strong points either although part of that problem is that she uses a lot of stills from an HD camcorder for the photo gallery.
Videos: There about 100 now. You get four download choices (who the hell still downloads "Real" vids?). No scenes, just full vids. Problem is that most vids are 380x280 and of amateur quality. I wasn't expecting professional stuff as this is an amateur site but the quality still lacked for me. The webcams were OK but they are also fairly small sized. Brandi, boost your vid sizes and get a tripod if the operator can't hold the cam still! You get about 30 HC vids and the rest are solo, lez and in a few other categories.
The webcam archieve is pretty good and with about a dozen HC cam shows out of 25 total shows. Each show runs about a half hour.
She does do a good job of promoting herself. She has a blog but it's loaded with cross sale stuff and isn't deeply personal, mostly chat about her swinger lifestyle. She is big on the swinging lifestyle and has a lot of links for those who are into that.
There is some teaser "friends" stuff from other amateur sites but you don't get anything but a few very shot vids and small pic sets so I just call that advertising.
Brandi does enjoy what she's doing and that does come through in the pics and vids. So, I give her an "A" for effort. The execution could be better by enlarging the picture sets, fixing some of the dead links, improving video size and quality and getting some zips done on the pics. It's not a bad site but there's nothing that will keep me here beyond the trial period. |
|
05-06-09 06:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
437
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I would suggest posting this topic about winrar's as a forum thread so more people have the chance to figure this out when they come across them. I haven't heard of them before this so its good info to know.
|
05-06-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
... photoshop some cute animal head onto her body ;)
|
05-06-09 02:26pm
|
Reply
439
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
I just don't understand why they split up mofos and brazzerspass to begin with, especially if they're just going cut back on the updates for both of the networks. I guess it's mostly marketing to generate more $$$ but since they're putting themselves out there as a megasite(s) they need to a lot better than a few updates a week. In the end I think it's just going to cost them customers instead of making them money.
|
05-05-09 10:06pm
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think GCode pretty much nailed it. I have to say that it would be nice to have the 4 reviewers have a bigger presence either here at PU or at TBP. I'm sure they're pretty busy but it would be nice to find out a bit more about them and here what they have to say either in the forum or elsewhere.
|
05-05-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Overall, I would have to say Duke. He usually scores the lowest of the 4 (and I tend to be conservative on my scoring as well).
|
05-04-09 11:23am
|
Reply
442
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Sounds like you were generous with the scoring on this one. I know the webmaster has popped up in the forum (his English definitely needs some work) so don't be surprised to catch some flack on this review. Anyway, I did glance at the site a while back and suspected that it was a very amateur Eastern European slap together job. Suspicions confirmed.
|
04-30-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
The tease stuff is OK but for repeated viewing I guess I prefer a little pink on the palette. Most tease sets aren't done that well to me anyway so I guess I want a bit of an edge on what I do see most of the time.
|
04-30-09 03:39pm
|
Reply
444
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
drummstikk's Review
Glad you like the site but your review says nothing. I appreciate humor in reviews but when that's all there is the review is worthless. We want to see specific information about the sites (pic sizes, vid sizes, numbers of sets/scenes, download options, etc.) so that we can make an informed decision about a site before joining. A "100" review pretty much says that it's biased and, like most "100" reviews we see around here, have little to no information about the site. As it stands now, no one is going to take you or your review seriously. Thus, as Badandy hinted at, what is the point of the review?
|
04-29-09 08:26pm
|
Reply
445
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Thanks for the tibbit o' porn there. After all, who doesn't like free porn. After looking at the signup page, I note that you have to call an 800 number in order to cancel (don't know if that's entirely true or not but it's what the fine print says). Still, sounds like it might be worth checking out if the trial is not limited (no mention of full access on the signup page).
|
04-28-09 04:59pm
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I've gone months without joining sites but only a few weeks without surfing for even the free online porn stuff or looking at my stash. My hat goes off to those who claim they've gone 6 months or more; clearly people who can "take it or leave it", at least when it comes to surfing for porn.
|
04-28-09 04:50pm
|
Reply
447
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I saw somewhere that Ron Jeremy's penis already has a twitter account going. Which, when you think about it, probably has more intelligence than anything he could post.
|
04-27-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
448
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess I don't really see the point. I use PU for the reviews and the forum. If the reviews are recent, I look at those first. If people are active in the forum, you know when they're around or not.
I guess the only point for having a "last visited" note is for people who want this place to be more of a social networking site. Is PU really missing out on that demographic? Call me old school but I guess I don't really care when someone last stopped by or not.
|
04-27-09 10:49am
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Makes one wonder how pathetic porn must be for blind people. All you're stuck with is the soundtrack ... all the endless moaning and lawn mower level shreiks for minutes on end. Probably makes the neighborhood late tom cat fights sound more erotic.
|
04-24-09 12:46pm
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hunting in the jungle is fine ... so long as you don't have to listen to Axel Rose sing about it the same time you're doing it ;)
|
04-23-09 05:32pm
|
