Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good site that includes access to two other sites, doing my best not to call it a network.
- This is one of those sites that the models are the big selling point, very attractive, cute, pretty ... mostly thin and young looking models.
- The price was even cheaper than the TBP price shows, it was $19.95 when I signed up.
- Updates daily, is easy to navigate and would go as far as saying it's one of the best navigating sites.
- I'd almost add this my newest criteria for a site to have to be reviewed, it has photo sets and they're downloadable.
- Download speeds are above average, about 75% of my top speed but will mention this more in BL since it's possible I'm being capped by my cable company.
Cons:
- Considering how young most of the models look, you're sure to walk away feeling like a dirty old man/woman. Maybe that's a pro?
- Two pre-checked cross-sales.
- Not for sure I would want much story since I wouldn't be able to understand them but there's not much story.
Bottom Line:
I put off joining this site for several years. I didn't feel I was old enough to fully enjoy it, much like Teen Mega World. I guess that's me saying I'm now old enough to enjoy it.
The sites you receive are: Wow Girls, Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. Starting out with some numbers:
Over 600 models
Over 4,000 videos
Over 5,000 photo sets
The quality is very high here. Close to 700 of the videos are 4K. Their oldest videos are available in 720p, so there's very little low quality content.
The navigation stands out for being a little different than what most sites use. Since they have three sites, you can select to just look at content or from all 3 or 2. From there they have the basic tabs along the top that will take you directly to the videos, updates, galleries (photos), and model list.
They also have a tag system that seems to be fairly accurate. There are a few that make you wonder if you're looking at a porn site or a theater list like "Acoustic Intimacy". Either way, acoustic intimacy does not sound like porn.
They also have the videos that are shot in 60 frames per second.
Overall, the three sites give you a good blend of solo, lesbian, hardcore, threesomes and foursomes. Not to anyone's surprise, my favorite scenes are the solo ones. These models are a little different than your normal solo models since they can't communicate with their words and if they do, you can't understand them.
The sex can be hit or miss and I also think that's common with a site like this one. The guys almost always seem excited while the women do seem either shy or very horny. That's where the solo content stands out. Most of these women seem to love masturbating for the camera.
I should mention this before I forget it. My download speed estimation could be off a little. I was upgraded in internet speed again to Spectrum Gig. But the highest download speed I've seen was 450 Mbps, the Gig is supposed to be near 1000 Mbps. I've noticed it's not as high on other sites either so I'm most-likely being capped.
The models are some of the best I've seen, in the teen category. You even get scenes that are believable to the different models. Besides liking the solo ones, I also like the ones that are playful lesbian scenes. What man or woman even doesn't think about walking by the bedroom door and seeing two 18 year old young women kissing, fingering and well, just naked?
I think that should be added to this site's genre/niche, how about we call it, "For your voyeuristic pleasure"?
Which is why the pictures are such a big deal. The one thing I've always preferred with pictures is they let your imagination work. Sometimes when watching a video, I want to tell the model to stop moving around, pictures solves that problem unless you look at them too fast.
I have noticed they also play to the younger look of the models with some of the outfits like silky socks with a puff of lace at the top of them. I'll be okay with it as long as they don't bring out the lollipops and pigtails.
I should have mentioned that Vendo was the biller for me, they're trustworthy. The Paypal signup doesn't allow Visa cards.
I'm sure I could complain about some of the action being dull but maybe that's the point of the young models?
I would put these sites just a little below Nubiles but they're still one of the top 5 in pretty models, young model, type sites.
I would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member before or at least in a while.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My first time as a member to this fairly large, technically impressive site.
- Very pretty models. You might actually get bored with the models because they're all so pretty.
- Technical quality is excellent. Most videos start out with the 540p option, have the 720p option and the 1080p option. Things can get confusing here and I'll go into that in the cons and BL.
- Also a good site for those who like pictures. The pictures are downloadable at 1000 long end, 2000 long end and 4000 long end. Most sets have 75-100 pictures.
- Very good download speeds. I've consistently downloaded at 7.5 MB/s
- Daily updates.
- Decent blend of scenarios, solo, b/g, g/g.
- Very good navigation, clear and easy to use site overall.
- Uses Vendo as their biller, I've used them a few times and haven't had any problems.
- Good passion and believable scenes.
Cons:
- Well, there's one really big con. I feel duped at times. I go to model list and there's a really hot model, so I click on her and there's no content of her. I find another really hot model, click on her and it has one scene then says out from it, "If you're interested in more from this model check out FantasyHD with our special discount. No, no, no. This is a premium cost website. I understand when Reality Kings lets a person join for $10 then advertises their other sites, but not for a $30 site. Then I click on some other videos and it says, "Upgrade to diamond level". What the hell? I was going to upgrade until I saw the price of $68. I'm sure to go on about this more in BL.
- It wouldn't hurt them to add some variety to their models. Maybe a few tattooed models? Maybe a model that has ate a full meal in the last month? No offense is meant, but look at as a warning for those who aren't into just slim/slender models.
Bottom Line:
Edit: Just want to add that I received both Wow Girls and Wow Porn right off the bat. I had forgot this when typing out the pros. Looking at the past comments, I see several members talking about having to wait a month or two before getting access to Wow Porn. It is available now right from the start with Wow Girls, but it too also has the scenes that want you to upgrade to diamond before you can see them.
I've of course heard a lot about this site over the last few years. I will say, there's some really pretty models on here. Some of the prettiest I've seen. And many of them are doing hardcore. This site kind of reminds me of the heyday of 1byday/Twistys/Club Sandy, the mid-2000s boom of glamour models. Except most of these Wow Girls do more than solo scenes.
I'll get the negative out of the way since it really hurt my scoring of this site. Ads are one thing, but to have dozens of models in Wow Girls model list that are being pushed for you to join other sites is even more annoying than ads. There's even some models in the model list that have no content available anywhere on any of their sites or partner sites. Then there's scenes in the updates section that are not available with your "gold" membership and can only be seen if you pay $68 to upgrade to diamond/Shane Diesel. I complain enough about the American networks using tricky advertising to get you to click on them, but making me open a scene only to find out I can't see it, might be even worse. Why not just shade it out and put a diamond on it so I know I have to join diamond to access the scene?
The good news is, the rest of the site is very good. I'm still not really into the whole heartcore-style of porn, but it's not quite as mushy here as on other heartcore sites. The girls make up for it. Very few sites can compare with the quality of models this site has.
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to which scenes are "diamond" scenes. I've been able to access some of the 4k scenes and 60fps scenes, but others say I have to upgrade. While even worse, it seems like the older scenes are all stashed away somewhere since they too say I have to upgrade to diamond. Meaning, it's obviously not just the high technical quality that defines a "diamond" scene.
The pictures are probably an overlooked strength of this site. All of the picture sets I've looked at have the model starting out clothed and ends up fully nude.
The site's navigation is easy to use. Click a scene, scroll down to the bottom and click your desired format/quality, done. No goofy dropdown boxes or 61 formats.
The most important part of this review, for me, is that this is one of the first sites that has made me really look at the price of the site. I'm not for sure I can justify the $30 for this site. I've reviewed sites recently that had double, even triple the amount of updates, 1080p videos for 1/3 the cost of this site. The quality, production quality, is higher here, but I still don't know if it's enough for the price.
I did not figure the price into my rating, but it does give me reason to wonder if I'll join this site again.
I could see recommending it to anyone that doesn't mind the price. At least for one join. And I at least appreciate them not automatically upgrading me when I clicked on it to see what the price was going to be.
I don't think it's as good as Sex Art and I've just joined X-Art for the first time too, but haven't had time to spend comparing this site to it. I will eventually.
I would recommend this site most for those who like really pretty, glamour, prissy, girly-girls. Back 10 years ago, I probably would have rated this site a 100 just for the overload of prissiness from the models. I've gotten older and probably dumber. I'm just not as picky anymore. And as said above, would compare this site very favorably to Twistys at its highest point. Beyond that though, it's comparable to nearly all the other sites with Art in their names.
Also will say I love the settings used on this site. All the way from the furniture to the distant views behind the action. It's really great.
I know my score is pretty high for all my complaints, but I can only score so low when there's this many pretty/prissy girls in one place. Will be interesting to see if this site starts to offer their upgraded membership cheaper. I would give it a go at $20 upgrade or $50 for the full experience. I took off roughly 10 points for the annoyance factor of the upgrade to diamond/model upsells to other sites and models with no content.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Artsy, kind of taboo feeling, it’s unique but it’s not updating.
- Very good selection of models. You can win me over with Vanessa Decker and she has a really good scene on this site.
- It offers 1080, 720, 480 and 240 resolution downloads. They do have a 100 scene download limit per month, but I haven’t hit it. See the bottom line on that.
- One of my favorite pros to list, it only has 35 scenes but all 35 are worth downloading or watching.
- One of my subjective preferences, the cumshots are not always facials and there’s more of a chemistry feeling to the scenes.
- Download speeds are just okay (about 60% of my max)
Cons:
- It’s not updating and that’s a serious con with this site. It has a lot of potential.
- The speed of downloads, of loading, the whole combination of it is slow and clunky. I clicked a photoset to download and it took at least 30 seconds before it even started the download.
- The photosets should have been a major part of this site but instead, they are not even worth the click to download them. Some have 8 photos in the zip and high end is 2000 on the resolution.
Bottom Line:
I understand the parent site of this site was hit hard by Covid. This site has as much potential as just about any site I’ve been a member of. The scenes are kind of dark and moody. There’s a feeling of artsy but not too artsy. The acting and playing out of the scenes doesn’t even need dialogue. The motions and body language and chemistry is that good.
The scenes are hardcore but not that too hardcore. I think the word I’m looking for is they are hitting a middle ground here. A happy medium sounds funny when describing porn. That’s going to be a fetish one day. To describe the Vanessa Decker scene as an example of what all the scenes do with different but similar plots. Vanessa is being stalked or scoped out. She’s ice-skating and the stalker is contacting the person giving the orders. They seduce Vanessa in and she goes through a very sensual bath from two Asian looking women. Eventually it turns into Vanessa meeting the man that had all this setup and planned. It becomes a regular porn scene. It’s everything leading up to the “regular porn scene” that makes it good. I’ve seen other sites try similar and some have succeeded but all the scenes on this site succeed. The con of it’s not updating isn’t about an update. It’s about someone needs to be making porn like this.
There is a download limit of 100 scenes per month on the network. I will give them credit that they do not count streaming as one of your 100 scenes per month downloads. Some sites do count streaming since streaming is downloading too. I haven’t hit the limit. I have downloaded all 35 of these scenes. I was very disappointed in the pictures. There are downloadable zips that are 2.5MB for the whole photoset. Those have 6-8 pictures in them. I think pictures would add a lot to these scenes.
The download options are fine, and I’m going to try and explain what the wording says on download limit. If you download a scene in 720p, you can download the 1080p, the 480p, of the same scene and it only counts as 1 against your 100 limit but it has to be within a 24 hour period. Why don’t we just make this complicated?
If there’s a reason to maybe hold out hope that the site will start updating, it’s that the site has stopped before. They stopped updating on October 12, 2018, then came back on May 15th, 2020. I don’t know if that was maybe a recycle-job or if they really were stopping and then brought the site back with some new scenes.
The models in every scene are very attractive. The settings, the production values are high and having some kind of story does add to scenes like these. It’s definitely worth checking out if you have a subscription to Lets Doe It. I think it’s even their best overall site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A now network that consists of what used to be 4 standalone sites.
- TBP/PU price is very good for the quality and quantity.
- Covers quite a bit of niches with the network access, Hard, Erotica, Dark and Lesbian.
- Nearly 800 scenes across the network. Each scene has a video and photo set. The photo sets started out (older content) very small, 20-30 pictures each set, now in the newer sets they are around 300.
- Network had been updating daily, but just recently, there's a 3-4 day gap without a new update, but there are more updates listed in upcoming.
- Very good download speeds and no DL limits.
- Navigation is about as good as it gets, very clean interface and even with the switch to a network, it's easy and clear how to switch from one site to another.
- Wasn't too sure about the payment processor, OLife through Fame Bill, but it was easy to cancel and canceled immediately with a confirmation email.
Cons:
- Very much a straightforward professional site. Typical hangups here, things feel formulaic and you most likely will know all the models.
- Nearly missed a checked cross-sale at signup. It's over in the right margin area.
- If you're looking for anything beyond normal (2017 standards) porn, it's not here.
Bottom Line:
I had often thought about joining a couple of these sites on their own. Then I saw that it's a network now and decided to go ahead. My first thought, is just my opinion, they made the right decision by making it a network.
Their list of models is quite impressive (around 300), including a "return" of Tori Black, who is a longtime favorite. There's also some Brandi Love content and I know she's one of the more popular women in porn right now.
The technical quality is very good unless you're wanting 4k video. They have 7 resolutions for each video for download, ranging from 160p to 1080p, I think they have every possibility in resolutions in that range. There's no 4k videos that I've seen.
The photo sets started off very small. I was checking some of the older content and some had as few as 25 photos in them. Most of the newer ones are around 300 and they do look to be a mix of photo set style and screenshots from the video. Overall, they're nice pictures that top out at nearly 2000 long end and are downloadable.
The four sites included are Lesbian X, Hard X, Dark X and Erotica X. Lesbian is self-explanatory, hard is hardcore sex, Dark is interracial and Erotica is heartcore, or hardcore just not as physical and plays off romance between the models. It's a good blend since you can switch your moods without having to search through scenes to find what you're looking for.
It's rare these days to here of a network that has near-perfect navigation, but this one has that. When you go to the EmpireX hub, over to your left are the four sites listed by name, you can jump directly to one of those, you can take a chance with their "categories" or model list, but I've found just going from site to site makes it easy to find the content. The best part, no matter where you are on the site, there's a big XEmpire logo you can click on to take you back to the hub. You don't even have to use the browser back button.
As a network, this is a very good deal for the price and would be recommended to anyone who is looking for a variety of porn. I can't say I would recommend it to someone looking for amateur porn. It's very polished here and they've done a good job of finding pornstars who play their roles well. Oh and there's no stories here. Which is really the only complaint I have with the site. It's very formulaic. Having said that, a lot of the porn these days is that way too. Not that I'm accepting it, but it's not changing for the time being.
Recommended for a month join. I personally preferred Lesbian X, lots of tribbing and strap-ons. Would rate it highest of the 4 sites.
Anybody tried this out yet? It says it has a full featured trial, and of course, it catches my attention because the front page has Eve Angel on it, as does the second page. So, I'm wondering what this site is about. Is it a licensed site? The sample video it shows is of Tiffany Diamond, I've seen it on Teen Dreams and Twistys, my search for new Eve Angel content continues! Any info would be appreciated.
Here's an easy tip on the secure part: Add https:// in front of the web address. They have a secure connection with the https:// added. I don't know if their tech staff is non-existent or it's just an overlook on their part. Their web addresses should automatically forward to the https:// version but does not.
Mr. Bison, this is quoted from your review, "they’ve built up a large collection of videos and accompanying photosets. It’s hard/impossible to count, but exotics4me’s review suggests that they have around 1000 videos – that seems like a conservative guess to me"
I put in the pros of my review "Close to 1,000 videos" later in my review, I said, "Videos are 965 in count". Does that sound like a guess? You also said it's impossible to count. Any member would know the videos are easy to count. As of today, they have 25 full pages of videos with 40 videos per page. The 26th page has 12 videos on it. A little simple math tells us that 40x25 is 1,000 + 12 = 1,012. Not only was it not a guess, it wasn't conservative either. The photos are impossible to count. And saying someone is guessing might just take away their credibility, right?
I even explained in the review, "open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages."
Your critical attempt towards my review made me look at your review a little more. You say you are a current member. You list frequent and regular updates as a pro? You sure about that, current member? They have had 1 photo update and 1 video update in the last 20 days.
Another problem in your review you say the videos have an accompanying photo set, that is not true. Some of them do and now that you can see my video number was not off, there are over 2,000 photosets, 1,012 videos, there's at least 1,000 photosets not accompanying videos.
You also called it a rather high membership. X-Art is regularly available for $19.95. You didn't complain about Ersties $35 a month price? That's an interesting coincidence since this X-Art review naming me as taking guesses, just happens to be your first review since my extremely generous review of a 75 to Ersties.
Reading over your review doesn't even sound like you were a member. Especially if you compare it to your in-depth Ersties review.
Real wisdom to learn: Do not bark up a tree unless you can see the top of it. You never know what shit might fall down on your head.
You instigated the minute you criticized my review or name. Now your review has been criticized. Let's see your spin on that frequent, regular update schedule being 1 out of 20 days. Or how come the videos are hard to count when they have numbered pages?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's top artsy but hardcore sites.
- The quality throughout is very high.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of my max) but the site sometimes is a bit slow to load. It's not my internet and my computer is considered a still viable computer in video gaming. I'll go a little more into in the BL.
- The models. Some of the prettiest models in the world and they use high production values.
- Update schedule isn't consistent but it works out to 3-4 updates a week.
- CCBill as the biller, there was a cross-sale and it was checked, it's to their other site. Kind of hard to see because their signup page is black.
- If you've ever liked their content, you probably still will. I think they're one of the most consistent sites.
- While it has nearly 1,000 videos, I join it for for the picture sets. They have some of the best picture sets I've ever seen.
- It's one of the few standalone sites these days that gives you your money's worth and more.
Cons:
- My score reflects the 5 point automatic drop. I hate this site's navigation. It annoys the hell out of me. The videos navigation is very good. The model's list is very good. The updates, which is the only way to find the photo sets, is one long page of scrolling. I expected a change on that but it hasn't happened.
- I'm trying not to use the word "heartcore" because I for some reason really like this site but don't typically like heartcore. But that is very much a con for some. It's kind of mushy.
Bottom Line:
X-Art to me is a site you could join for a year and wouldn't get tired of the content, if you like the content. And, it might take a year to get to the bottom of the updates page! Why isn't that fixed? If nothing else, easy fix here, stick a photos "tab" up there with "videos" and have 30-40 photo sets per page. I think I broke my my mouse's scrolling wheel on this site. I have no idea how much content there is overall because I get to 2013 and stop scrolling but open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages. I not only know roughly how many videos but I can jump from page to page too. I was going to just do a 5 point deduction, but I believe an 8 point deduction is more fitting.
That wouldn't be a problem but I come for the photo sets. That's really my only legit complaint. I thought I had got around it. There's a drop-down menu that has "photos" in it. But all that did was put all the photo sets on the long, scrolling page!
If you've not been to X-Art before, it fits that "female-friendly" genre of porn. I hope I'm not being sexist by saying that. I know women who love the most hardcore porn on the internet. So, I'll say, in general, this is a more "realistic", mushy, kind of lovey style of porn. They still get very hardcore at times but it's done tastefully. That was the hardest paragraph I've ever typed in a review!
As I've gotten older, I have started liking the teen-style models but they're still not my favorites. And most of the models here fit the teen-type, slender, very pretty, if there are tattoos you don't see them often and implants are either a no-no or very rare. It's also not just male/female. They have quite a bit of lesbian too and some solo too.
I don't know if this is a negative but I like their pictures better than the videos. It's most-likely me. I haven't been joining or downloading much what I call "regular porn videos". I have downloaded 38 (exact count) so far at X-Art, so it's not that the videos are bad. Their picture sets have my favorite thing in porn photos, the models going from (usually)dressed fully to fully nude and they do enough of the in-between dressed and nude photos in their sets. They excel at it. The newest photo update wasn't one of my favorites. It's titled "Sex with Gymnasts". It's a lesbian set. There's nothing in the photos to make me think they're gymnasts. I was excited to download and view it. There's no stretching or upskirt splits. And they're nearly nude at the beginning! I hear gymnasts and I think tight shorts or tight leggings. But that's rare for them.
Videos are 965 in count, since January 2016, they've had the 4K option on the videos. It is a little sporadic back when they first started it but they're offering it on all of the newer videos. This shows the quality, at least to me, over those 965 videos, 961 have 1080p option. They also have 720p, 540p and 480p. The pictures are all downloadable and are 4000 long end in the "large" download file.
I even think I understand why I like their photos so much, the lighting is very natural. So you don't get the real warm colors like some sites use but you also do get crisp colors and I would even say the colors are more of a cool color. That's become more important as I've got older and my eyes don't especially like bright, vivid colors.
I also know why the site loads so slowly. It's that long scrolling page. Their "thumbnails" for each set are 350x400 resolution and I would estimate there's over 2,000 of those on that page.
I do like their solo videos. They have some with big toys and some with little toys and the models, as said, are very pretty.
As for the main male/female content: I've at least got over the feeling that it's silly to try and project love in a porn video but it's not just that. It's the mushy part that I don't do well with. I don't even do that mushy stuff in my life. They're up there making love. And I think that's where it loses me because I like the teasing and the playfulness and then they should go at it like jackrabbits. They never seem to respond to the teasing and playfulness like they've been teased. It's still not a big negative. The content is popular with some people and I'm okay with that.
The site is still a top site that's worth joining at least once. Can't complain at all about the technical quality or what looks like someone spends some time actually setting the scenes up. Just don't expect any double ass to mouth or even hair-pulling. Maybe that's why I like the solo videos better? Some of those solo ones look like they're trying to tear their insides out.
With solo content becoming more rare and focus on photos becoming even rarer, those who like those should definitely check this site out. And their lesbian content is on par with a typical lesbian scene. If they would fix that scrolling page so I could see all the photo sets, I would jump it up to 96-98 but that page will annoy some people. So, I'm going with a 90.
I think heartcore's definition probably varies from person to person, but this is what I consider heartcore:
Artsy, lots of foreplay, non-penetration acts (especially kissing) that eventually leads into what is supposed to be passionate intercourse.
My biggest problem with heartcore porn is one I talked about in one of my reviews, maybe Sex-Art. They've got me convinced that male talent #1 is really in love with female talent #1. Then I watch a video of female talent #2 and she's with male talent #1. Then I watch 30 more different female talents and 25 of them are with male talent #1. I've always been known for complicating things when it comes to porn, but I'm fairly forgiving when it comes to fantasy aspects. For example, most Kink content has convinced me the women prefer harder sex. The step-sibling niche is another that I can at least see in fantasy, but the heartcore sites are trying to convince me or my fantasies that this one male talent really loves 25 women and they all love him too. Maybe that's it, I can accept almost any fantasy except for ones revolving around a real emotion like love.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed!
Cons:
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets.
Bottom Line:
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site.
I didn't realize they advertised as exclusive. I thought that was just a error on the TBP page, remember that those original pages could have been posted awhile back. I do think there is some of what badandy is talking about, the content was exclusive at some point. I know that they use Fred the photographer and his work is on many sites. If you will look at Spencer's review he lists it as "semi-exclusive"
The way I would compare the two sites is that everything Babelicious has on Sexy Babes, UK Babes, is non-exclusive. The actual content on Babelicious though is probably 70% exclusive, but it only makes up about 1/3 of their total content. Xisty has a bit more exclusive content, especially the hardcore b/g sets they have.
To answer JD's question, the sites aren't ran by the same person. Babelicious' main guy is Nick. Xisty's is named here as Crazy8, but having talked to him as a member, I can say that his name isn't Nick.
The sites are similar though, and both sites are similar to Teen Dreams, Twistys, and the rest of the multi-model supersites. There is overlap of content on each site.
I still want to say that Xisty has more exclusive than the others, but I haven't been a member since December 2008. Have no idea why, but Xisty has the best looking photos of the sites listed. Their colors really jump out at you. In exclusives, I would say Xisty, Twistys, Teen Dreams, Babelicious, in that order.
Hey crazy8, long time no talk. I was a member last in November and continued to believe the site is improving. I need to post a new review since the other one has expired and should have some free time coming up over the next few weeks to do that.
This isn't really a technical question, but I just wanted to run this by you and see if you have noticed this. Do you see similarities in Black Angelica and Eve Angel? I remember having some older sets of Angelica where she looked very plain, now all of a sudden she is all glamorous looking. My wife was the one who noticed the similar hair, builds, and even poses. The one though that I had noticed looking like Eve that I first found on xisty was Eva Smile. I know the hair is very different, but they look a lot like in the face and their bodies are similar.
If you can't tell I'm still a little lost since Eve Angel entered what looks to be a semi-retirement stage. Good hearing from you.
Hey guys, this has been one of my favorite sites over the last few years. I was a member last in November 2008, and I'm checking the newest sets I have from there to get the specs.
I have a newer Eve Angel video from xisty that is 852x480 with a 2049 bitrate.
One of the oldest videos I have from there to show the lowest quality they have is of Jenny Sanders, it is 640x428 with a 1272 bitrate
The picture sets are 1800x1200, 1200x1800, and then there are the mega picture sets that go up over 3000, though those are not available on all picture sets and do come zipped.
The updates as of November were coming just as advertised, and did include some models that I'm not familiar with, so I would assume those are exclusive.
Site navigation is still a real strong point of the site. Not for sure if any of you were around that much back when this site first took off, but their webmaster at the time, Brad, might still be the WM not for sure, really listened to the PU members input and I always thought it showed, very easy to use site. I would still rate it as high as my original review.
I may check that site out, I have seen it on TBP, but never have tried it out. I'm kind of stuck right now. I will probably join 2, maybe 3 this week and really I would like to try some new ones. I have seen Gabriella before, but her newest xisty set just blew me away. I'm not really into the toys, especially those huge ones. I have enough common sense to see some toy videos and realize the girl is just blocking the viewer from seeing everything. Kind of feel like a masturbation cop, lady, step away from the toy! Though I do like the Sybian videos. Thanks for the info, I had wondered about Teenrotica.
One thing I had noticed with Xisty and it was a reason for my higher score on their site, is that they have great content of models who I never thought looked that great on other sites. After talking with Xisty's staff away from PU, their photographer Fred, has to have something to do with this quality. Britney/Brigette had never been that impressive to me, but her Xisty content is excellent, top-level. Same can be said with Gabriella. I haven't seen her Simon Scans content, but I had seen her before. Matter of fact, I've never been a member of Simon Scans, not enough Eve content ha ha! While I don't base a membership solely on Eve's content, where I consider myself a collector of Eve's content, I at least like to know that I will get a few exclusive sets of her when I join a $30 site.
I think it just goes to show that most of these models have photographers they are good working with and others that they are not good with. In Eve's case, I noticed a very, almost excited Eve on Zoliboy's site, that I have rarely seen and her new content on Xisty is also some of the best I have seen of her.
I had posted a review about this site when I first joined pornusers. I was blown away with their high quality pics and videos, but didn't feel like there was that much material on the site. I just rejoined for my second go around, and I'm still not for sure if this is a new feature they added or not, but now there is an alphabetical order model finder as well as having the models listed in order of popularity.
After rejoining, and using the handy little alphabetical model finder, I can see that this site has much more material than I remember. Including their new movies in True HDV. They list that they have over 130 models, and there isn't a bad one amongst them. I hadn't seen this one model, Gabriella Moon until I rejoined, absolutely stunning model.
They have also changed the background designs and colors, which may not be much to some, but I think it keeps everything feeling fresh and new. Like brainpass or one of those sites that has the same background as they had 3 years ago, it makes you feel like nothing has changed or improved.
So, it is a great job all around by the xisty staff. Definitely check it out, there are very few models from Europe that they don't have. Including some of the best masturbation clips of Susanne Spears that I have seen. A little b/g in there as well, plus all those new HDV 1280x720 on those videos, their older ones are still a nice 640x480. I will edit my score in a week or so, add probably 10 to my review for the changes!
Hey Crazy8, I will be rejoining the first week of June. There was several sites I wanted to check out, and have learned a lesson about getting too many sites at one time.
When I mentioned the girls talking, I've seen Eve talk in older videos. You can tell she has trouble, but the ones where the cameraman was respectful and nice, she would smile a lot while talking and it gave her an innocent look or sound to her voice. The same with the ones I have seen of Mia Stone talking.
A bad example of talking to the models would be a site about an apartment, I won't use the full name of it, but the guy was annoying. He was asking Eve on it, "What is your favorite cartoon?" It was too much you know? I wondered if he did it because she wasn't willing to do hardcore, it was like he was badgering her. Even a "Hi, my name is (model's name) I hope you enjoy" would be a nice touch.
Most of the Euro girls seem nicer than the American models, not for sure on that, but I speak as an American who grew up in Los Angeles, where women with attitudes was the norm. I hope everything works out with Eve being on your site. I'm running out of new material of her outside of her personal site.
I did stop by your site today after work and love the new look of it! I'm also seeing some models that have been added since I was a member. I don't remember seeing Simi, though I was a member in March/April. I still don't know what you all have done with Britney. I picked up some clips and pics of her from another site. She looks way better on xisty and seems to be enjoying herself more on your site.
I will definitely be doing a follow-up/edit of my review of your site in early June. Just the presentation change in the preview has caught my eye, great colors and backgrounds. It looks even more professional now. I like sites that give you at least a classy feel to them. You all will be a top 5 site if you keep this high quality up. I will send a ticket in on your site when I re-join. Keep up the good work.
That is great, I believe that Eve would definitely add to your site. I will do a follow up review when I rejoin. Which I meant to reply to your last reply and tell you that I would rejoin in the next month or so. I've had the chance to go back and watch more of the videos that I downloaded the first time and still am really impressed with the quality of your videos. You mentioned the cost of hardcore scenes. Can I ask you a question? Why don't the Euro girls talk more? I have a video of Mia Stone, not even for sure what site I got it from where she talks just a little at the first. I thought those few words made that video 10 times better. Do the girls refuse to talk? I've also seen several of Eve on sites where she talks a little and seems to have a fairly good grasp of English. I think it adds to the Euro models innocence or what us viewers think is naive of them.
One really big compliment that I can give your site is the Britney model. I have seen her on other Euro sites, but the videos and pic sets you all have of her are really great. Your site is building a very nice group of models. If I were to list my favorite Euro models, Eve, Bridgett (Annette Dawn), Mia Stone (Believe she has retired), Zafira, Sandra Shine, Anetta Keys, Peaches, Eufrat, Stracy (You all have the best of her that I have seen!) Vanessa (knew her as Veronica), also impressed that you all have masturbation videos of Susanna Spears. You all have almost all of these. When I get a new membership, I will make sure not to have too many other memberships to sites.
One last question, what other names does "Nicol" on your site go by? I haven't watched her vids yet, but remember wondering if she is Evelyn from other sites. I will get more involved in the feedback on your site on the next membership as well. It really is nice to know that there are webmasters who are listening. Thanks for that and for this reply you posted. See you on the site in about a month or so!
Thanks crazy8 for the reply, maybe my browser wasn't showing or allowing another way to search models? I've noticed a lot of sites not working with Firefox recently. I understand that the focus isn't on hardcore, but I do usually try to comment on whether there is much hardcore. You can check out most of the replies to reviews and see that is the #1 question asked by members. I know that one of the HC videos was excellent, believe it was Jenny Sanders. On the other hand, I know that most of the Euro models don't do a lot of hardcore so I knew what to expect. The site itself, content, quality is all great. Next time I join, I will try it with the new Internet Explorer and see if I get better results from navigation. By the way, I didn't take anything off for lack of hardcore. I tend to prefer the solo and g/g scenes more.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Nice site overall, pics and vids are high quality
- I can't get enough of these Euro models, good amount of them on here
- Has a lot going for it and with time will be a much better site
Cons:
- Do not like the rating system that changes the order of the models.
- Very little b/g
- Blasted navigation system!
Bottom Line:
I know this is supposed to be unbiased, but this is the first time I have been on a mainly Euro site that has no Eve Angel. Still, I have more Eve than I have sense.
The rating system is a good idea on any site, but the way it is used on xisty makes things confusing. The search is in order of how the models are rated, so if you are like me and just go through the faces and pick ones you like then download, when you come back sometimes, the models have moved up or down in the order they are listed because their score has changed...do not like at all! Also, some of the top models, Sandra Shine comes to mind if rated way down the list. If I hadn't taken the time to scroll down, I would have never found her.
The quality of the pics is very good and the more popular sets are in Mega Zips which are the 3000+ pixel pics. It really is a good site with tons of potential, but the navigation/search is terrible. It is an original idea, it could be greatly improved if the member had a choice to search alphabetically or by rating, but when I was on it (about 2 weeks ago) that wasn't an option that I found. I will recommend it if you have been to the other 3-4 Euro sites and looking for new material of most of the popular Euro models. I also think with time they will improve the search. On a side note, the b/g scenes that I found, also not separated from solo, have to dig for them. Those that I did find are very good. Some of the best I have seen. Recommended.
Follow-Up:
Months after my first review, I return to see HDV clips that are simply amazing looking. The site itself navigates better than I originally reviewed, though I may have not spent as much time on it as I should have the first time. Everything has improved and I would say they have the nicest, most helpful staff, I have talked to. Their regular clips are higher quality than most sites highest quality clips. Great job by their staff!
I was wondering if this site's review should be updated, at least the fact section. The reviews are from 2004, the facts were updated in 2005. I wouldn't ask if it didn't rate so highly. When I scan through TBP looking for something new, this one is one of the highest rated. Just a few things I will point out. 320 on the high end of videos is listed as "high quality" in the reviews. I'm thinking 640 on the high end these days is considered average. Just thought I would mention this since most of the higher rated sites seem to get follow-up reviews that keeps everything up to date with ever changing demands of porn fans. Have they improved the video quality?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Capri Cavalli, one of the prettier porn stars and she's just behind Aleska Diamond in the prettiest eyes in porn for me.
- This is some sort of re-launch or new launch. It should be noted that the name is different than the TBP listing has, it's now XXXCapri not Club Capri Cavalli.
- Videos are nice quality 1280x720, except for a few of the older ones, which is where this site can be very confusing.
- Pictures are in the 2000 long end range and are zipped.
- Navigation continues to be a strong plus on this site especially with what I think is the web 2.0 software.
- Comes with four other sites
Cons:
- The site is updating, I was very frustrated with this group of sites when I did the Regan review and said I thought they were recycling. Maybe their webmaster could chime in and say if these new updates are newly shot. Capri is pretty enough and young enough that it's really hard to tell, will continue in BL.
- At this point, it's a very small site, 26 videos, 19 photo sets.
- Doesn't look like there will be any new webcam videos
- Re-launch as a different site is going to cause some confusion, hopefully I can help that confusion out in the bottom line
Bottom Line:
This is a very hard site to review. Two main reasons, it was known as Club Capri Cavalli, now it's XXXCapri. I don't know if that needs to be changed in the TBP listing.
Next problem and why there is going to be confusion. When listed as Club Capri Cavalli in Duke's review for TBP, the site had 69 videos and 83 photo sets.
Not anymore. The site has 19 photo sets and 26 videos as XXXCapri. Similar to the situation with the Regan site, I'm not for sure if there's a legal problem that happened there, but I do want to clear that up before anyone joins it expecting quite a bit more content than there is.
What content is here is very good. Seems to be a trend with the models on this group of sites to be good dirty talkers. Capri is no exception, which again leads me to preferring her solo videos over the girl/girl, boy/girl. The content by genre.
19 Photo Sets
6 solo
4 group
5 girl/girl
4 boy/girl
26 Videos
8 solo
3 group
5 boy/girl
7 girl/girl
3 old webcam with Jessica
As I said in the cons, the site is now updating. It's not quite making a weekly update, but it's pretty close. August 7, 2011, seems to have been the date that it switched to the name and since then there have been 3 photo updates, 3 video updates on August 15, August 25 and September 5th. I'm not going to use the recycle word, but would like to know if these new updates are actually new updates or just old sets with the new watermark logo on them. I don't think it's going to change my score much either way since an update every 10 dates isn't going to fill the site very fast.
I look at it the same way as the Regan and Tanya site, if you're a fan of Capri, it might be worth joining just for what looks to be mostly exclusive content.
However, if you are a fan of the other models, the group itself as a whole is very good and would be recommended.
I'm hoping if nothing else with this review that I can warn Capri fans ahead of time that there isn't near as much content as there was when the site was listed under the Club Capri Cavalli name, it will save them some frustration, like the frustration I had with the Regan site and in turn save the webmaster the frustration of seeing their sites get slammed by reviews expecting more.
If the updates are new and the content is still being shot then I would add about 5 points to the score.
Sorry about my excitement in the subject! Sativa has a solo site now? I felt the same way about Eva Angelina having her own until I read a review. Anybody have any information about this site? I noticed the TBP listing hasn't even listed a number of vid or pic sets. I've joined most DVD sites just to collect Sativa and a few other stars movie clips. The TBP listing does mention exclusive material.
I can't help but have her as a favorite. After watching the old guy Steve something smack her and spit in her face, she opened her mouth as if to tell him to spit in her mouth, he starts to spit, she spits all over his face and calls him a bastard. That's a woman! Any info would be appreciated.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Solo site of porn model Tanya James, comes with access to four bonus sites.
- Tanya is a very good solo performer. I wasn't that familiar with her until receiving this as a bonus site.
- Videos are 1280x720, this covers all the videos on the site too, though some of the 1280x720 earlier videos are downloadable as flv files only.
- Photos are in the 2000 long end range, also come zipped.
- All the sites in this group of sites have what I would call nearly unmatched navigation. For once, sites decided to make everything simple and it works perfectly.
- Near max download speeds
Cons:
- By far the biggest con, no more updates, not for sure if Tanya retired or not, but the last update was in April 2011.
- Add the no more updates con to the fact that the site only has 32 photo sets, 31 videos and you can really understand the problem with no more updates.
- One thing I really liked about both the Regan and Jessica sites in this group were the webcam archive videos, doesn't look like Tanya did any of these and that's a shame because she seems to be a good dirty talker.
Bottom Line:
A hard to site to grade. If it were still updating weekly, I would probably go low 80s with the score because Tanya is a very good performer. Some of her solo videos on here are as good as any solo videos I've seen. She's very believable.
If you're not familiar with Tanya, she could fill some niches, tall, long legs, she's listed at 5'10" in heels, she looks to be pushing 6'2", some of the longest legs I've seen in porn and it took me several looks to decide that her boobs are fake. Maybe I'm wrong though, but I do believe they are, either way, very good boob job if they are fake.
In one way, I think it's disturbing that I've found myself giving points for great navigation, but so many sites these days are cluttered, confusing, misleading ads here and there that it's a breath of fresh air to see a site...that just works how it's supposed to.
This is what you're going to get from this site.
32 photo sets
6 boy/girl
5 girl/girl
18 solo
3 group
31 videos
8 boy/girl
3 girl/girl
16 solo
4 group
I wouldn't completely dismiss this site though. Tanya pulls off the blonde one set, brunette in the next set very well, the long legs, the dirty talking, she's very good. I much preferred the solo videos which is a plus since there are more of those and it looks like boy/girl, girl/girl videos of her are pretty easy to find on DVD sites.
Having a HD option for all the videos is also a plus, though some might not like the flv videos since those require a different media player that windows media player, I recommend VLC media player on those.
This is how I'm going to approach recommending it. If you're just a fan of Tanya and not the other models on here, then I could maybe recommend it. Not being real familiar with her content, I still believe this content is exclusive, so it may be enough if you are a collector of her content, especially with the solo videos being pretty rare from looking at her catalog of content on DVD sites.
As a whole, if you like Jessica Jaymes, Regan Reese, Capri, not for sure what Capri's (Cavalli?) last name is now since it has changed and like POV porn, there is one of those included too, then it's easily recommended. Jessica's site really pulls these others up if you are a fan of hers, making these other sites nice bonus sites.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
