I checked out the review you posted on the previous version of this site, thanks for the tip of it switching to this new name. I had cheated on TBP a little and read Rabbit's Review of it, it looks like they didn't carry all of the content over from the original version that you reviewed. Rabbit has the numbers as 19 pic sets, 11 videos, review date was May 2008, but Rabbit has the site listed as updating twice per week. That makes me skeptical since I'm wondering if they are just releasing the content they removed from the original version of the site as new content. Oh and the genre at Rabbit's is listed as "Fetish". So I guess it is going to be mostly these strange settings and sets that the previews show.
I think that one listed update that has her in the Blue Nike bikini is the one thing pulling me back ha ha. What a stomach and curves in that one! I just noticed that it says "65 updates and counting" I didn't understand the whole reason though for only 30 photos per update that Rabbit lists, that is a terribly small set of pictures. Thanks for the info on the original version.
I'm still debating whether to try it. I'm trying to cover a few sites that I have never tried before and at least, I know Susana is on this one! I don't want to get too risky in my search for sites I haven't joined.
Hey GCode, yeah those samples worried me. Susana reminds me of a woman who would have made a great actress in movies. That could be an idea for a thread that could be useful, have the members list their best 10 models, that way everyone could maybe find at least one or two they hadn't seen before. If you are interested in Susana's content, Twistys has a lot, including a video of her in a gym, stripping her workout clothes off that is really good. Teen Dreams has a nice collection of her work too, 1byday also has a good collection of her. She fits the mold of the type of models I usually prefer, just like Eve Angel does, beyond a teen, not quite a mature. There is a whole group of those models that I collect.
Hey Panther, I used to love Action Girls because every woman on there seemed to be in perfect shape, I had forgotten all about that site. Susana seems to enjoy the dress-up, heavy dramatic scenes. The best sets I have of her came from a site that is still up, but haven't updated in over a year called The Next Girl. The sets she has there were taking outside, looks like some kind of festival and the photographer gets some great shots of her coming from under the trees, completely nude and she seems very playful in these. She even has a hat on in one set and is eating ice cream. I wish that site had kept going, they also have some really good sets of Eve Angel and one of the best masturbation videos of Anetta Keys that I've seen. Looks completely natural, cuts in on her masturbating, no tease, and I've never seen her act that turned on in a video.
Susana just doesn't seem to have a lot of masturbation videos. I was checking my hard drive and would say less than half of the videos I have of her are masturbation. Though I will say the video Twistys has where she is in workout attire and rolling around in a gym is very hot, no masturbation, but she is very erotic in it.
Are you kidding me? The beautiful hardbody of Susana Spears being turned into an 80 year old woman, ala Mama's Family? Has anyone been a member here before? I really am a huge fan of Susana, love the 8 pack abs set with the Nike bikini on, but there seems to be as many overly dramatic sets as nice, nude, look at her beautiful body sets. I had heard about this site last year sometime from a friend and a lover of Susana's modeling. Recession is easing, hopefully, and I thought I would check it out.
I'm not too worried about the price that looks way too high, as long as they have some great nude sets of Susana that are exclusive, but some of the samples made me cry. Why would you cover her body in bandages? No, not bondage, that would be hot with Susana, I'm talking hospital bandages. And yeah, the Mama's Family Susana set supposed to be Susana when she gets older is just not very appealing. I don't understand why someone can't just make a nice basic site with Susana as the star, beautiful natural boobs, great curvy butt, one of the best back arches this side of Nautica Thorn. Anybody tried it?
Spizoo used to be better known as the Jessica Jaymes XXX network. It featured several solo sites back then that are no longer around. Spizoo, I assume, bought the Jessica Jaymes network and merged it into their content. The last time I was a member, 2014 or 2015, under the name Spizoo, it was a good but very straightforward network of gonzo porn and Jessica's solo site was a nice bonus.
In 2011, I reviewed Jessica Jaymes XXX a 91 and the review is still on here.
If I had reviewed Spizoo in 2014-2015, I would have scored it similar to the current TBP review. It has excellent quality (technical, including 4K) but I wouldn't have pushed it into the 90s as the content itself was very much like the average gonzo porn site, bordering on cookie-cutter.
I had joined through Spunky Bee before as well, after reading the previous comments about Teenburg being included, since I was more interested in TB than Spunky, but it was $10 cheaper. I got 9 sites with Spunky Bee, but there is definitely something different on that join page now. Seems like when I joined it, about 3 months ago, there was a box with the 9 included sites on it. Good content on this network, but I couldn't see paying that full price for any one of the sites without at least some access to the others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Stepfamily porn with a twist or maybe not.
- The Spy twist is kind of hokey but it does lend to the imagination of these scenes being possible.
- Segpay is the biller.
- Still updating but only one update per month.
- Total of 161 scenes as of 6/8/2020.
- All scenes have up to 4K download option.
- Good download speeds (around 80% of my max).
Cons:
- I think the stepfamily niche is starting to become stale and overdone.
- I will explain this one further in the bottom line but trying to stick to the "spy" part causes the camera to sometimes not be in the best position.
- Site works fine but there are broken thumbnails.
Bottom Line:
The majority of these scenes start with either the stepbrother or stepsister catching their stepbrother or stepsister masturbating. Some of the scenes have it like one of stepsiblings has set up a security camera to spy on the other stepsibling.
The con I mentioned would be for example, stepbrother sets a security camera up on one side of the room. Stepsister comes in from partying, lays down on the couch and starts masturbating. The stepbrother, of course, walks in while she's masturbating and they start having sex. The camera is still on the other side of the room. If they stuck with that it would add something of a voyeur twist but they don't stick with it. Somehow, the camera gets up and moves close-up about halfway through the scene! Must be their ghost stepsibling.
This niche is stale unless you do something really creative with it and I think they're trying with the spy part. If you've ever watched CFNM scenes where the sister and her friends catch the brother masturbating, that's similar to what you see here.
The action is good overall but is plagued with the same problem a lot of newer porn has. It's like they forgot what the niche was once the scene gets going. It turns into a standard hardcore sex scene.
They do a good job of adding the build up at the beginning, building at least a little story and the scene lengths show that with many lasting over 40 minutes.
Something I really liked about the site is some of these newer models are pretty good actresses. You don't get the shock face when stepbrother shows that he has a dick.
That's not a lot of variety in the scenes. There is one orgy. Most of it perverted stepbrother spying on stepsister.
The site has no faults when it comes to technical quality. Every scene has 480p to 4K download options on the videos. There are decent photo sets to download and every model is attractive. I don't keep up with the newer porn models but I'm positive these are almost all top-level pro models. Which is where the acting comes in. Some of these ladies are very convincing in being surprised, appalled and make the scenes at least humorous to watch.
I wouldn't put it on the same level as Family Strokes but think it's really close to being the second best "stepfamily" site behind Family Strokes. It's a good site on its own and even better if you join the platinum package that gives you access to more than 10 other high quality, niche sites.
The system here won't let me edit my previous reply. The low resolution photo zips are downloading properly now. I don't know if they had a glitch going on and maybe seen the review and fixed it.
I checked the ultimate upgrade and it is $199, that's the only way to get video downloads and high resolution photo downloads. It does give lifetime membership but this is what really bothers me the most, TBP reviewed it in May 2019, and this is directly from the TBP review, "Only VIP members have access to downloadable videos and Zip files for the high-res pics. VIP subscribers can also check out the behind-the-scenes interviews and backstage videos."
So, it looks like they have changed the way their site works. The membership I joined is VIP and the only options I have for downloading are pay $4.99 per video or join ultimate. It really is a shame. The models are great looking and the videos I've streamed are very good at teasing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Artistic site that might just grow on you.
- Check out the model list, I don't know these models but there are some really pretty models on this site.
- Updates every week, it's a little confusing and will need explained further in the bottom line.
- Dark trance like music in the videos, I usually don't like music in a video but there's no masturbation. Kind of like having your own private stripper.
Cons:
- The model list got me to join it, that's where it all went downhill.
- Standard membership was $7.95, VIP was $9.95, I joined VIP, once inside, there's another upgrade needed to download called Ultimate. I didn't upgrade to it.
- Navigation is about as useful as a map to another country than the one you're lost in.
- It did let me, the VIP member, download "low" quality photosets in a file my computer doesn't recognize. I'm sure it can be renamed to a zip, but this is why I didn't upgrade to ultimate. I could tell this site is poorly designed and poorly maintained.
- The "music" videos aren't music videos, they are a picture of a model with music playing in the background.
Bottom Line:
I saw this site's model list and joined. I saw the navigation, the gimmicky pricing, the photo downloads that don't work and realized I had paid $10 to look at some pretty women for a month.
You all will have to bear with me. This site is one of the most confusing I've ever been on.
Here's the choices, releases (updates), models (best part), music (models dancing to music), votes (you pick one of four models to be released next), backstage (BTS type videos), interviews, virtual reality (takes you to the VR version of this site which you have to join, but there are VR videos on the non-VR version too).
Sound confusing? The standard video for each model has the model stripping down to fully nude (most scenes), there's not masturbation but these show more than an R rated movie does. Some of the videos are very good, they are too short though (5 minutes on average). It's kind of like being a member on Zishy, the models look like they're trying to cover everything, but a little slip happens here and there.
Can't download those without upgrading to Ultimate. I wish someone would slap these sites on the forehead and say, "You offered basic and VIP during sign-up. Why didn't you offer ultimate and why would you offer two options with neither having downloads?" From what I read on the TBP review it's a cheap upgrade but I'm tired of fooling with the nonsense on this site. The music videos are included in the standard membership. When I see music videos on a porn site I think it's going to be a model dancing around to music. It's not, it's a still picture and is the background music from whatever scene matches up with it.
I thought I could at least salvage this membership with photosets of these very pretty models. It says I can download low quality or upgrade to ultimate to download high quality OR pay $2.99 to download ONE photoset.
The gimmicky feel is furthered by them having a VR site. On this non-VR version of the site they have VR videos too. I don't watch VR so those are a waste too.
On the videos, if you don't want to upgrade to ultimate you can pay $4.99 per video to download each video. Of a woman rolling around naked for 5 minutes.
They treat their interviews and backstage videos like those are the real treats here. The interviews are nearly 20 minutes long and I suffered through one to see if maybe there was something special about the interviews. It's a Russian model that talks about loving cocktails, going out with friends, having friends close to her and having colorful dreams everyday about having lots of money. I should be getting paid to watch those.
Where I think the real tragedy is here is how attractive the models are and they have up to 4K on the videos. It looks like a very expensive studio with top-tier models and top-tier equipment just threw together a bunch of scenes of women rolling around naked while a dark trance type music plays in the background. I'm not even saying they should have masturbation. It walks a line between classy and snotty. Most of its time is spent on the snotty side.
I'm being very nice with my score just because of how pretty the models are. I find the site nearly unusable. I think if they offered the site at one price, added downloads and focused on that it would be 10 or more points higher.
They have a little over 100 models. The positives I can find in the videos is they use slow motion as the models butts move in front of the camera, it's good and gives good views but after a few of them it becomes dull and boring.
One last warning that I knew wouldn't fit in the cons. Be very careful on the join page. It is set to 6 month membership at a very low price ($6.99 a month for VIP). I just happened to see my total price as $41.99 and backed out, there's a tab to switch it to 1 month.
The update schedule shows a new scene/model per week, then it says a new interview is released every two weeks, photo sets are released whenever they feel like it and backstage videos don't seem to have a schedule.
Hopefully, they will stop trying to use 3 different forms of membership or else I think they're making a complete waste of those very pretty models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The numbers say it’s a massive network. It’s owned by the same people as Puba.
- They list 37 different sites.
- Their stats say 1,797 videos with 1,904 photosets. Ask Mark Twain about stats
- Download speeds are very good (close to 90% of my max).
- Most of the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p. (see bottom line, it’s hard to specify how many)
- You will find some top porn models on here.
Cons:
- I don’t know if they advertise exclusive. I’m not going to say it’s not. I’m just going to say if this is exclusive it’s just a newer created version of a porn scene. Like cutting the blowjob out. I have seen some of this before.
- No dates, no way to know if it’s updating, no reason to stay another month to see if the numbers change. The bottom line should explain it better than I’m doing in these pros and cons.
- You have to send an email to cancel. Not a big deal but why not just make it automated?
Bottom Line:
I was wanting to look into Puba. I reviewed it a few years ago. I know it’s always budget-friendly and they have a lot of models that I like. I was signing up for it. I’m one of the worst people for letting my mouse slide up the screen. The pointer was over the close tab. A pop-up showed up saying I could add Staxxx. It would be under $10 for both. That’s a good deal … maybe.
Staxxx advertises 37 different sites. Those mostly have 25-30 videos on each and 25-30 photo ets on each. I think the math catches up with them. They have a combined roughly 3,700 photosets and videos on 37 sites. That’s 100 combined photosets and videos per site. To balance that some. They do have a site called Bang a Teen, that for some reason causes me to spell Teen with a g, Bang a Teeng, that has 534 photosets and 460 videos. That’s nearly 1,000 of those 3,700. That leaves the other 36 sites with 2,700 combined photosets and videos.
I’m not trying to be overtly critical of the network. I’m trying to tell people what they’re going to get with the site. The Bang a Teen site, to me, looks like the old, licensed Euro porn that used to fill up sites. It's not bad. There’s a chance you’ve seen it. I even found a scene with a very young Eve Angel in an all-girl orgy. Just based on my knowledge of Eve. That was probably 2006-2007. The Euro porn was once great. I think it just depends on your feeling of I’ve already seen that scene.
The videos have limited download options at standard definition and the two high definition choices. There are some cute models. I keep wanting to say a saying I don’t like saying. You get what you paid for. They have one “site” called Compton Booty. I grew up near Compton, about 2 miles away. The site has 38 scenes. The female models are quite attractive black women. I don’t know this for sure. It just looks like some ripped the scenes off 5-6 similarly titled DVDs and called it a site. How can we fault them for that? They’re only charging $5 per site. You couldn’t buy a handful of bargain bin porn DVDs for that. Sites like this leave me frustrated. I know it’s not a great site. This is not really a network. The “sites” are more or less categories. I do believe porn like this has a place. The bargain bin. I don’t see a reason to be that critical of it either. This is one of those sites where the bang for your buck figures in.
They do have a coming soon section that shows 156 videos and 148 photosets coming soon. The bad part is, those say 2/9/22, which is now. If they are adding that much maybe per month. There are a lot worse deals in porn. They do have a relatively broad range of genres. There is no model list even though the models are tagged by their names. It is just not a site that’s going to make you feel like it’s anything more than a trunkful of bargain bin DVDs. You will find some scenes you may like. I can look at the previews and see a few that look good. I also can see that there is transsexual content on here as well. I feel like I’m doing a disservice if I don’t review it. I wasn’t for what I was getting with it. I doubt I will do anything more than a stream a few of the scenes.
If it helps any, I’ve seen much worse that cost much more. They do give you photo zips and downloadable videos. The photos are nice photosets. And those do have the Staxxx watermark on them. I would recommend it to those looking for a lot of porn for cheap. The pictures are probably the best part of it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Fun stepfamily site that is one of the better ones. They have improved this site. Or the models got prettier.
- This is a big site for this niche and to be part of a network, it has 203 scenes.
- It was updating fast but hit February slow. Was averaging 4 updates per month but only 1 in February. They do already have one for March, today is March 6th.
- High quality video and photoset downloads.
- CCBill is the processor.
- Fast downloads at 90% of my max
Cons:
- I don’t know if it’s easier to say this by telling one of the scenes is about a stepbrother’s friend stepping in for him with his stepsister. They’re already tired of each other.
- You will get tired of anything if you watch it enough. That’s the case here. I think it applies a lot to the Nubiles sites. I have even had that happen with Nubiles.net.
Bottom Line:
If you asked me if we needed more stepfamily sites I would say, “Do we need more porn sites?” At some point, this niche has to just become what you expect. This site has been able to keep my interest not with the niche. They have some really pretty models on this site. I usually do not like women with short hair but Chole Temple is very pretty. There are models on this site that don’t need the niche. I would watch her mow the lawn. It’s not just one model. This site has a consistent new pretty model on it. I wonder how much it’s a full circle feeling. That’s all that mattered to me years ago when I first watched porn. I needed to see pretty and sexy women. I didn’t care what they were doing or who they were doing.
The quality is very high. The newer videos have 4K and all the videos have 1080p and 720p. The photos are what we expect from Nubiles. The newer ones are 7000 long end, most are 6000. You can read the comments and see that people are getting burnt out on this niche. There is a scene with Ryan Reid who is very attractive, and she has a halter top and short-shorts on. They consistently bring in these models that fit these roles and dress them up close to perfect. I noticed one comment said something I agree with. There are scenes on this site where the female leaves her panties on to start the sex and just slides them over. I remember those days. It was always funny since they didn’t think about the cup, they were creating to catch any fluids. It gives the scenes an innocent feel.
They are doing the silly scenes. I just think that works in porn. I have been that way for a long time. I don’t see the reality porn side of it. That’s boring. One of them that was guaranteed to catch my attention is, "I caught my stepsister humping the Easter Bunny". It has Clary Trinity in it and she's one of my favorites of newer models. It has the stepsister humping and grinding a stuffed Easter Bunny. That used to be a fetish. I don't remember what it was called. The Japanese use that some.These scenes remind me of a young woman talking about her first sexual experiences. Those were not very serious or realistic even. Women this young are not likely to have their bedroom covered with a bed of roses leading to the bed and perfect lighting. It’s probably going to be, “He got hard, and I was horny.” That’s what these scenes show. I don’t care if it’s her brother’s stepsister from a different father. I’m thinking this as I have another stepfamily site to review. I don’t know that we want this niche to be that believable.
You have the high quality videos, large amount of content for a network site, hopefully the update schedule is going to return to 4 per month and that’s added to how pretty the models are. I think they could drop the step part and just call it Nubiles Porn. That niche is just not registering with me anymore. The site works well and even has something someone else pointed out that I don’t think I’ve ever mentioned in a review of this network. They have a download button on each scene, so you don’t even have to click it. If they could get one for the photosets that would be even better. Clicking that download button brings up a dropdown menu that has all the download resolutions. You just click the one you want. That’s a nice, easy to miss, touch. Unless you’re a photo collector. You’re going to have to click it anyway. The site doesn’t take anything away from the network. If you removed the titles you probably wouldn’t even know what the scenes are about. The part you do pay attention to is very good.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly reality porn type content, similar to Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...
- Good discounted price through TBP/PU
- Was careful about billing, if you join using Paypal, the biller is Epoch.
- Technical quality is high, 1080p option on every scene I've looked at it (as far back as I've looked 2012). Photo sets are small, but at least they have them in zips, most are close to 2000 long end.
- Download speeds are above average for me, about 75% of my max DL speed on pornsites.
- Seems to have some kind of reward program where you get to pick a "locked" site to open after 30 days of membership. That's almost a con since this site can be a bit frustrating to use.
- By my count, I have access to 27 sites and there's a couple more that are locked. The categories are fairly diverse, including a Japanese channel/site, a Lactating channel/site and a Cosplay channel/site.
- Looks exclusive to me, but I'm not going to guarantee it.
Cons:
- Navigation. That was supposed to be read like this ... "navigation, period." The site can be confusing. There doesn't seem to be a network hub site where you can search across the network, but if there is, it's doing a good job of avoiding me. There's a "network" tab. From it you pick through the different niches. Which will be con two below this one. Once you pick the one you're interested in, the search box only seems to work within that site/channel, instead of the whole network.
- The channels/sites are even confusing. Some sound like porn studios like Harmony Vision, Herzog Videos, while others are just named after their niche like Cosplay and Filthy and Fisting.
- You could spend a month just trying to find a scene you saw on your screen, 20 minutes ago.
Bottom Line:
I've considered joining Stiffia several times in the past since I do like the big reality networks, but I was always put off by the negative comments about frustrating billing hassles. Now that they have the option to join using Paypal/Epoch those billing concerns are gone.
My first thought as a member was, "What have I gotten myself into?" The site itself has a nice layout, clean, non-cluttered pages, but outside of just clicking on latest updates and scrolling through scene after scene, you're kind of stuck with figuring out their wonky search engine. I would fix these issues as simple as this:
Put a network search engine on every page.
Keep the search engine that only searches within one site/channel/niche. It's useful, it's just not real practical to a new member.
Put a network model search engine and again, keep the model search engine for each site/channel/niche.
It's not that big of a change, but it caused me to knock 15 points off my score. I spent way too much time trying to figure out what was what and what I was looking for. I don't think I've ever deducted that many points for any one con, but as you can see in my cons section, the navigation really took up 3 whole/different cons.
Once you figure out how to use the site, you've got yourself a real good network of porn. I just wonder how many people give up on it before figuring it out?
Here I go offering advice again. Merge some of these sites/channels together! I can't figure out what I'm going to find on each different channel. Give me a niche search or something. I just looked at a row of 6 videos, there's an interracial scene, two older women with younger men scenes, an anal scene, and two what looks to be amateur scenes.
Technical quality is very good. I've looked back into the older content and haven't found anything without the 1080p option. Videos are of good quality to my eyes. All kinds of hot models, including some I know of and quite a few I've never heard of. There seems to be a Greek/Spain influence in the models, but I'm not positive of that, just basing it on the female facial features and model names.
One more complaint: The videos have four download options. One option says, "Full HD (1920)", the next ones say "HD (1080)", "SD (720)", "Mobile (480)". Most of us know that 1080 is the height of a 1920x1080 movie, so why are there categories for 1920 and another one for 1080?
It's because they're labeled wrong. The "Full HD" is 1920x1080. The "HD 1080" is actually 1040x584 and the "SD 720" is 720x404. Which for lack of better word is confusing. I've always known 720 as 1280x720, which would still be bigger than the second option on here listed as "HD 1080". Maybe someone who runs it or does their programming doesn't know the difference in the resolutions?
Now that I'm done complaining there's still a really good network here. Problem is I'm as OCDC as anyone you'll ever know and these inconsistencies are going to pick at me until I don't like the network at all.
Normally, I would list all the sites and let the names of the different sites explain what you'll be seeing on those sites, but you can't with these "channels". Gonzo porn studios, reality porn studios, Japanese sex, anal, it's like joining a DVD site with no search engine or eating those jelly beans that are oddly-flavored and wondering if you just ate "booger" or "burger". Cue the Forrest Gump "life is like a box of chocolates" saying.
Still, the content isn't bad. Which is the point of joining a porn site. You have a nice mixture of younger models, older models, all the possible heterosexual niches and it's all in high quality video.
I've saved nearly 1,000 characters just to use for if I recommend it or not.
If you don't mind searching for good scenes, you will like this site. If things like crooked pictures on your bedroom wall don't bother you, you'll like this site. If your spouse leaving toothpaste stains in the sink don't bother you, you'll like this site. Better yet, if you have some extra time on your hands and like the idea of exploring the many niches (that's a big compliment), you'll like this site. As a matter of fact, if you sometimes feel like you don't get the most out of your membership to sites because you download everything you want in the first week, then don't go back, give this site a shot. I can all but promise you, you won't find everything you want in a week.
I'm trying my best not to be too negative here since I understand most people are not as easily-annoyed as I am. And I want it to be known that this site can at least to some extent, compare to the bigger, better-known networks like Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, and their porn studio sites are comparable to most porn studios.
But I'm going to say despite my 84 score, I don't see me coming back to this site until they do something with the navigation, search engine and model list.
Most definitely We Live Together. I was on a strap on site recently Strap On Bangers, but it was part of a really crappy network, and didn't seem to be updating. If you haven't tried the 21st Sextury sites, they have several new ones, Lez Honies, which most of it probably can be gotten from Pix and Video. We Live Together gets you part of a network as well. And don't forget the top lesbian site on the internet, Sapphic Erotica, though some say it isn't quite as good as it used to be, it is still very good. Also not a bad price at $19.99. Lots of content and high quality.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Longtime fan of solo porn and that’s mainly what this is.
- Pretty women masturbating with very large toys.
- Around 250 scenes, no updates, but this is one of their sites I don’t remember but it was around in 2008.
- The newest scenes have 4K and all scenes, even the oldest, have 720p and 1080p.
- Download speeds are very fast over 90% of my max.
- I wasn’t familiar with their billing but it works. I was able to cancel as easy as I joined.
Cons:
- If you don’t like sex toys being involved in a woman’s masturbation, you probably won’t like this site.
- This is one that will show my experience with solo porn. Pro models are not that good at solo porn, or they would be a solo model.
Bottom Line:
I used to like finding solo scenes of hardcore models. I always felt like solo porn is a little more intimate and it lets you see more about the woman’s personality. I have never believed any model was better at solo masturbation than Eve Angel. It took her years of daily scenes to reach that point where she could control the viewer with her eyes. You’re not going to get that in any of these scenes. Most pro models coast through solo scenes. I don’t know all these models. I am assuming they are all pros. They are on DVDs that aren’t titled amateur.
You get a pretty decent sized site at around 250 scenes. The one part that stands out to me is how long some of these scenes are. Some of them are over 40 minutes. Most solo scenes are 20 minutes or less. Sometimes you could find a 30 minute one. That just tells me it’s a professional. These do qualify as hardcore masturbation. This is not slide a finger in. These women are using 8-14” dildos and they have a collection of them, an assortment, it’s like a bouquet of dildos. If you’re a wedding planner and a lightbulb just went off over your head, get in touch, I gave you the idea.
I know from experience that a lot of porn viewers don’t like dildos in masturbation scenes. There are some good scenes. They have the return of Eva Angelina (not the same as Eve Angel), she was not known for good masturbation scenes. Eva was a hardcore freak. The newer scene she has on this site is really a lesbian scene. There is a toy but there also are tongues and fingers. The best scenes on this site are the ones with more than one woman. You have to go back to the oldest scenes to find good solo scenes. I do believe the act itself is something that hasn’t carried over from 2010. Solo porn used to include a lot of teasing.
I don’t know where this site came from since the scenes are similar to the 4 Finger Club. Which is also on this network. I’m pretty sure four fingers cause a stretched out snatch. Just my thinking. The scenes that are solo are still long. They go through progressions that are kind of illogical. It’s probably why the scenes are long. I wouldn’t recommend those scenes unless it’s pre-2010. They have some good ones in the old ones. I would stick with their lesbian or two woman masturbation scenes in the newer ones. They have some good ones including Adriana Chechik, Kalina Ryu and I mentioned Eva Angelina. I am pretty sure that was from Eva’s return to porn.
It would be a tough sale for me just for this, but it does come with New Sensations, which is slowly becoming a tough sale for me too. This is another site that you will have to dig through to find the good scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer handjob, tease site I had never heard of until now.
- Much more than just a typical handjob site with pussy grinding, women masturbating themselves with one hand and see bottom line.
- Very big site for this genre with 398 models and 506 scenes.
- Updates once per week and download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Downloadable photos from the videos, they are screencaps, but they seem to go through and pick out the best moments for the photo sets.
- Easiest navigation I have seen in a long time. High quality site all-around. Has a tag system but would almost put that in cons since they need more specific tags.
- Rare blend of models for this genre. See bottom line.
Cons:
- Some of the female action parts won’t appeal to everyone. A lot of it is the woman fully nude straddling the man’s leg and humping his leg while giving the handjob.
- This one always comes up with me on all handjob sites. More tease. Will explain in bottom line.
- The company that owns the site has 3 other sites including a public handjob site. For the premium price, I would like to see them at least add the Public Handjobs site to Strokies.
Bottom Line:
Handjob sites are some of the most difficult sites to review since there’s usually not a lot going on in the scene. These guys at Strokies are trying to change that. Most of these scenes last over 30 minutes. I’m used to handjob scenes lasting 8-12 minutes. A very important part of handjob sites are the models. Models can show their worst side in handjob scenes. Especially the ones that try to talk dirty throughout the scene and end up saying the same 8 phrases repeatedly, “It’s so big”, “It’s so hard”, “Are you going to cum for me?” Some of the ones here are guilty of it too. I don’t want to go into a lecture but Howard Stern once did an episode where him and two of the other guys on his show brought in women to talk “dirty” to them. Only one “passed” and it was because she told them what she was going to do to them. She didn’t ask them questions which of course breaks the man’s concentration. Can you just see a man fingering a woman or giving her oral and stopping to ask if she’s going to orgasm? At least I’m laughing about it since that direct style of “dirty talk” and asking questions does nothing but annoy me.
What I established there is the importance of the model to a handjob scene. Not what she looks like, not how great her body is but instead how her personality is. It breaks down this simply: Does she just want you to cum to get the scene over (Are you going to cum for me?) or is she loving it and wanting to please you (I want your cum all over me). When I see that popping up on handjob sites, I’m going to expect some royalties.
This site does so many things right. They have a clear model list with nice, easy to see pictures of the model, they have a “videos” section. That’s where all the updates are. They have one extra tab, a “live” button which takes you to webcams. It’s unobtrusive. The only ads are 3 small ones at the bottom of the pages. When you click on a scene you can stream the video, read the tags and download the videos in 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The pictures are just below the video downloads, you can view them or download them in a zip. Why can’t every site be this easy to use? It’s not like it’s a tiny site with nearly 400 models and just over 500 scenes.
I wish I could tell you if these are known models but I haven’t been following recent porn that much. The women are the prettiest and best range I have seen on a handjob site. There are Persian, Asian, Latina, black, white, even one dressed up like a Leprechaun. That’s one of the reasons for the high score. They are trying to improve a stale genre. Seeing handjob scenes that last 35 minutes is very unusual.
I have looked over the majority of the content and have not only seen some models I do know (Cindy Starfall, longtime favorite), but also noticed a lot of the older scenes don’t have tags. Other than that, in watching the Cindy Starfall scene to give an idea of how a handjob scene can last 30 minutes or more, she strips, she teases, she masturbates a little for the first 10 minutes of the video which is great to me. I did notice her scene is more of a straightforward handjob scene. In contrast one of the newer scenes I really like is of Mia Kay. The first five minutes or so is the guy talking to her and the entire time she’s giving a clear view of her panties up her skirt without making it look too obvious. She’s naked and masturbating to a very wet orgasm by 12 minutes in and then the handjob starts. That is something I have talked about in past reviews of all handjob sites. Why not let the woman masturbate before the handjob so it’s a good show for the viewer and it turns her on? Her thigh-riding stops with her licking the guy’s thigh where she was grinding her pussy. By 20 minutes in, she’s leaning back, fingering herself with one hand still giving the guy a handjob. Nearing the end, she turns around and sits on the guy’s face and keeps giving him a handjob until he cums. There’s even some mouth and tongue teasing on the head.
I won’t go too high with the score since I’m not happy about having to pay again for their Public Handjobs site which I don’t think has near as many videos as this site and I would still like to see more pussy on dick tease, butt on dick tease. There’s very little else to complain about. I don’t really have a list of sites I join on a regular basis anymore, but this one if nothing else is going to keep me around for more than one month so I can get all the scenes I want. I will then visit it periodically to get the new updates. Very nice surprise from a site I hadn’t ever heard of.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A once network combined into one large site with BDSM, bondage, all that stuff the mainstream sites avoid.
- I do believe some of this is authentic and for me, that just means it’s not going to guarantee porn or sex. The fetish is more important.
- It’s a big site once the network was combined. It has 799 scenes as of 3/6/22. It is updating weekly.
- The newer videos have 4K.
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max.
- Some of the women are very pretty for this niche. See that con.
Cons:
- Some of these women are not attractive at all to me. That’s why I think it’s authentic. These are women that are known to be into the fetish or niche.
- I have trouble with porn that doesn’t have sex or masturbation in it, unless it’s photographs and teasing. If you’re not into some of the fetishes, you won’t like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
I have been a regular member of BDSM sites and bondage sites. I like most of it. I don’t like anything that makes me think the person was hurt. I don’t care what they consented to. That’s my opinion. That is what you have to accept when you are on a site like this one. There’s a really good chance you’re not going to like maybe 30-40% of the content. You may not even understand it.
This does come with Adult Prime which I have been a member of since around the launch. I just hadn’t paid a lot of attention to this site. I remember it as a network of BDSM and bondage sites. That works better to me. There are scenes here that I have no idea what they’re doing. They have a woman tied up in bondage and are shooting a slingshot at her. Where is the sexual part of that? Yeah, she’s naked but she has welts all over her.
This site is not bad at all. It just has the stray scene here and there that makes me want to stray. It intrigues me enough that I wish they explained in text or gave a story about what’s going on. The good scenes, for me, are the ones that have a sexy, dominant woman spanking a smaller woman. Holding a magic wand between her legs. Her arms are tied over her head. She’s in writhing orgasm. Her feet are swinging off the ground. Most of the scenes on this site are more like that. They have some machine fucking. I haven’t ever gone against this; I have a lot easier time with two women together in BDSM and bondage porn. Their scenes with two or more women are very good. I don’t like the candle wax scenes. I don’t get that.
You will still run into the scenes that are not sexual. Maybe they are for the person, the dom and the sub, I don’t believe that translates in video. It’s like when I watch a video on youtube and wonder why I watched it. That is the part of BDSM and bondage porn that I don’t really like. Just because you get off on it doesn’t mean I’m going to. I’m not your sub.
The technical quality is very good. They have the regular options, 720, 1080 and 4K on the newer ones. They do have pictures but they’re not high quality photosets. I have said that before about Adult Prime. I believe they could improve their photos a lot. Even reviewing this as the fully combined network it still feels small. I don’t need to click most scenes. I can look at the preview and see it’s not for me. The ones that get me to click are the ones that make me think, “What the hell are they doing?” It’s like youtube. I would even say the sites and network Submissed would do better in the old format. There’s too much mixed up together. This is a scan over the newest scenes. I see a cute, petite woman being masturbated by a tall dom woman in leather pants. That’s a click. I see a guy in an army looking jacket with a hat pulled over his eyes leading a woman in tied up rope to lay down on a mattress in an alley. Probably not a click. I see a pretty blonde going wild and there is a machine at the bottom of her bed. I’m going to click that one. I see a small guy protecting his nuts and a tall woman kicking him in the nuts. Not clicking that. That is the point I’m making it’s a 50/50 chance I’m even interested enough to click it. That one with the nut shot looks even worse. The woman looks attractive, but I noticed she has a strap-on attached to her and she’s making the guy lick her shoes after she kicked him in the nuts. The guy looks like he hasn’t had anything to eat in a year. There’s the bonus to BDSM and bondage porn. I’m going to have to click it. He better wear her out. Okay, that was a mistake. She’s not that attractive and she just punishes the guy for 20 minutes straight. She does peg him and remind me that this network was better when they separated their sites into niches and series. Similar to how Kink does. It’s a different part of Adult Prime which is still, to me, a very good deal.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bondage, whips, cuffs and nearly every kink you can think of with a porn scene to boot.
- Models I’m not familiar with but most are attractive. A total of 288 females.
- They are updating, it looks like once a month and there are 450 scenes.
- No 4K but I don’t consider that a con, 1080p, 720p and 540p downloadable videos.
- Photo set zip download is available.
- Download speeds are good but I did find a little inconsistency at times, going to say I averaged 70% of my max.
- Lots of tags and you’re going to need them. They have things on here I’ve never heard of.
Cons:
- This is a tough con to list since I assume anyone that joins the site knows what to expect. Some scenes are really rough. I don’t see anything that makes me think negatively.
- I didn’t find some of the models attractive. I do believe this is authentic BDSM, which would make me think there are only certain models willing to do it.
Bottom Line:
You know you’ve entered into a whole other world of porn when the first scene you watch has all of these in it: Whipping, spanking, water torture, hot candle wax, a pillory and suspension cables. There’s a porn scene in there somewhere. Those that know me, know that I’m not hugely into harsh or violent porn. I would say some of this goes a little further than I like. Nearly every scene has a tag for “crying”. I also know crying doesn’t always show pain. I believe this site gives a good representation of BDSM porn. The porn really does kind of just sneak up on you. I didn’t want to list this as a con. It could be something I would regret. A lot of the scenes didn’t seem long enough. Most are under 30 minutes which is to me how long a porn scene should last or at least close to 20-30 minutes just for the sex. I could regret that. Some of these scenes do look painful. I thought the best part of the scenes was it looks like these women enjoy BDSM.
The most impressive part is the amount of tags. I’m going to share a few since I had to watch the scene to find out what it was. I’m going to go from the softer side to the I have no idea what that is side. Softer: Catsuit, kissing, masturbation, see, this is regular porn. Even the middle ground: Anal, rimming, blowjob, strap-on, cum in mouth, even cum-eating, now for the rougher side: Crotch rope, nipple clamps, needles, hot wax, yokes. I think they are calling what I call a pillory a “yoke”. There’s the crying tag, the screaming and the slapping. The screaming don’t bother me since most porn models need to stop talking during the scenes. If they’re screaming they’re not talking. These are just some of the, “I have no idea what that is” tags. I’m focusing on these tags for a reason. I think when you join a site like this one, you take on the understanding you’re exploring areas you’ve never explored. Seeing things I’ve never heard of adds to the value of the site. Some don’t and I will list a few of those too. These are the ones I had no idea what it was: Monogloves, mummification, I realized I knew what that was, I just didn’t know that’s what it’s called. Here we go with one, pit-of-doom. I have you another one too, head-box. That made me think of the Brad Pitt movie Seven. That one looks like something straight out of a Saw movie. Rubber Gloves. That sounds self-explanatory, they don’t want to risk passing germs. Rubber gloves have a sharp parts on them for added pain … and pleasure. The ones I have no interest are Enema, Breath Play and Gagged. I really didn’t feel like any of it was that far out there. I just didn’t know the names.
I will say they have some of the most unique lit candle scenes. They have the lit candle right up to the woman’s pussy. I think talking about the different scenarios covered is more useful than saying they have sex eventually.
You get 450 of these scenes plus one new one per month. I wouldn’t compare this directly with Kink. This is more like those pay per scene sites where they really get into a fetish or fetishes. Some of these spanked and whipped and paddled women go from pale skin to dark red. It doesn’t seem to be over-excessive. I do think they play to the pain and crying a little more than they should. Who am I to say that, I don’t do most of this stuff. I want to say the acting is very good. The women typically give you a feeling of them being in fear of the master.
I do think if you join it just for the sex you’re probably not going to be that happy.
The videos are downloadable. I have read about a DL limit but I have not hit it. They don’t list the amount of the limit. The videos can be downloaded in 1080, 720, 540. The oldest scenes have 720p as the highest download option, which isn’t bad at all. They have photos and downloadable zips for those.
My personal favorite and it’s just because it can be related to a fetish I have. That is the “forest” tag. That’s public, even if it is in a forest. I liked all of those. I have seen a few other sites try the outdoor, bondage, those to me, go too close to forced. This site does it a little more tastefully and I do believe that’s an important part of a site like this. It’s definitely different than what you’re probably used to. I don’t feel like it pushes too much on comfort levels. I have those I listed as being not interested in but that’s just my own problem with those types of scenes. I’ve never understood the use of enemas in porn. Maybe before the porn scene but that’s what they’re going for here. This is like a BDSM network crammed into a site. I think your biggest complaints on this site will be subjective to each person. The length of the scenes is the only universal one. These scenes seem like they should be close to twice as long as they are. Good, different site that I recommend for those looking for something to break away from the mainstream.
It's real, in this area the lowest speed is 200M, we also have 400M and 1GB (it's more like 940M when using). I got it in their Spectrumtacular deal. I did have to switch my mobile service to their mobile service but it is through Verizon and that's who I already had. You can check here to see if it's available out there.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons:
- Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line:
Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.
I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.
What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.
Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.
There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos
That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.
Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.
This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.
All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.
The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.
I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.
You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.
It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.
It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.
The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.
Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.
They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.
My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.
Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.
I joined this site awhile back, maybe 2010, and thought it had a ton of potential. Back then my thought was it was some kind of spinoff of FTV since I know FTV shoots quite a bit in Arizona and Sun Devil is usually associated to Arizona. The layout also has a FTV look to it with the magazine style thumbnails for each model. I still have some content from it, mostly photos, but the preview isn't being helpful unless of course, they stopped updating since it only shows a small section of models. They also had the public tease/exhibitionism like FTV. I know that FTV spun off at least 3 solo model sites and pretty sure those have all stopped updating. Though let me make clear that I'm not saying it is FTV that owns or runs this Sun Devil Angels site. It very well could have been a site ripping off FTV's style for all I know.
Hey GCode, sorry about the delay on this one. Good news, they've now got Epoch handling their billing again. As far as the site goes, it is a bittersweet site for me. I loved the photos, beautiful colors in the background, but most of all, the outfits the models started out in were some of the best I've seen. I would have never known that meant anything to me if not for an Eve Angel photo set I have from Super Glam. She has on a blue tank top, black workout shorts that barely cover her butt and there was mesh involved too. I had never seen Eve like that. It was very casual looking, but she still looked glamorous. The site focuses on the very top tier of Euro models. The video quality is a stretch to say average. But, I did just open one to see how it looks, they use a bit of a letterbox on the sides, which really, when stretched to full screen actually helps it look less grainy since it isn't trying to fit the whole screen.
The quality of the content on the videos is mostly graphic masturbation. The Eve one I just opened even has rubbing her butthole some, which is kind of rare for Eve. The best way to put it now, with Epoch handling the billing, if I had never joined it, I would in a second. The content is exclusive as far as I know. All videos that I'm looking at start out dressed, little stripping, dancing, then into masturbation. I say bittersweet because I always thought they could be one of the top Euro sites with even 4 weekly updates.
I've considered going back several times, but they are not using a billing processor that I'm familiar with so it has kind of put them on hold for now. They still aren't giving many new updates, only about 9 photo and videos combined per month. The first time join is pretty good though. Especially for those A-List Euro models and their content is exclusive. Video quality was slightly below average the last time I was on it though.
I was going to join, but the payment processor is a different one than usual. It says Global Cash Limited or something like that. I'm going to send a support email and ask about it. I had just noticed the new content on the previews and like you, was impressed. I really like Tea, she is one of the few newer models that has caught my attention. I will let you know as soon as I hear back about the payment processor.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
