Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that made me think I had found heaven but am thinking this might be hell.
- Two of the greatest "girl" sites, Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink come with this network. It also has Fist Flush too but the content is very limited, I found some way back in 2008-2009.
- Navigation is okay, seems better than it is at first, gets worse, but then improves, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are excellent (85% of max).
- Sapphic Erotica is arguably the greatest lesbian site in internet porn history.
- Very high quality, dating back to the 2007 content, they have 1080p option on the videos and have 4K option dating back to September 2015.
- Updates roughly 10 times per month.
- If your porn interest is in just women, solo and lesbian scenes, this is the network for you, there are 0 scenes with men.
- The archives include some of the most explicit masturbation (Give Me Pink) of the Euro top models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Two problems in one con. On the model list, they are still using Sapphic Erotica's aliases for the Sapphic Erotica scenes. If you weren't around when Euro porn was the top porn, you might not be familiar with this and the countless debates we used to go through with webmasters over the confusion of aliases. And they use one name for multiple models, even when you use the "search" but the search goes around the aliases! Meaning if you search for Eve Angel, her scenes listed as Daphne (Sapphic Erotica) also show up.
- Fist Flush has very little content on here. It's not a site I'm familiar with so I don't know how much there should be.
- One of the advertising "index" pages I was on said you get 7 sites with Sapphic Erotica but you don't, you get 2 with Sapphic Erotica.
Bottom Line:
I'll start with why I took 10 points off the score. When I was checking out Sapphix, it said 7 sites are included with a membership to Sapphic Erotica and one of those sites was In Focus Girls, a site Sapphic Erotica owned. Once I signed up, there's really only two sites on Sapphix. It also only officially lists 3 but one is Fist Flush, I've only found a handful of scenes from it (really didn't intend that one). This is combined with the network Perfect Gonzo, that was supposed to have Give Me Pink on it. When I joined Perfect Gonzo, they told me it was originally supposed to be on Perfect Gonzo but was now on Sapphix. This is all too typical of mid to late 2000s Euro porn.
But the Sapphix site redeems itself. It does "only" include Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink but those are two of the top 10 sites of the 2005-2010 era (Euro boom) AND they're updating. I probably should review those sites separately since they are very large sites with big followings and might in the future but for now, I'm sticking to the network.
I had to dig deep into the archive of my reviews to find how I scored these sites in the past. I gave Sapphic Erotica a 94 in 2007 and Give Me Pink an 88 in 2008.
Sapphic Erotica was and still is the premier lesbian site, TBP's current score on it is 95. And they've been around since 2003. They were the first lesbian site that I know of that had "tribbing" or scissoring. They had deep kissing between the models, models getting so turned on even with their panties on that you could see a wet spot forming on their panties. But they did go mainstream at some point (2010, maybe?) and started focusing on quantity over quality. The newer content (2014-15 and forward is more like the older content).
Give Me Pink was at one time part of a group of sites (not a network) owned by one company that focused on extremely high quality, for the time (1080p in 2007) and they had every known, great, top-tier Euro model on their site with a catch. It was as close to "hardcore" masturbation as you could get. Close-ups throughout the masturbation. Old friend and PU member Denner once asked, "Is it a porn site or a site about gynecology?" It wasn't for everyone but it was for me. I had watched these models tease and "gently" masturbate for years. I wanted to see more and Give Me Pink did that. Then, it and its sister sites, stopped updating. Sister sites included All Internal and Ass Traffic. Those like me then found In the Crack and I've even wondered in, In the Crack reviews, if the Give Me Pink producers were the producers at ITC. That's a compliment.
What you get here is Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink, including their entire archives. You also get 10 new scenes a month and the quality shows with 1080p videos dating back to 2007, 4K dating back to 2015.
It's really impressive but there's that alias problem which really isn't a problem unless you want to use the model list and not the search box.
If you're into the more extreme insertions, Give Me Pink was one of the first sites I knew of that did it. Including some models using a smaller than average baseball bat. They also include photo sets in downloadable zips.
There's a chance that my excitement over this combination won't be as exciting to others. That 2005-2010 era of porn was my favorite and while they have new content, I'm mostly focused on that era.
Their overall content includes 2237 movies. The Sapphic scenes average 30-40 minutes, the Give Me Pink scenes average 30-50 minutes. They do some "strange" things in the classic Give Me Pink scenes including but not limited to, squirting milk out of their butthole. The newer Give Me Pink scenes aren't near as long (10-30 minutes).
I would say anyone who is into the kinkier masturbation would like Give Me Pink, especially if you were into any of the Euro models from the time period I mentioned. Anyone who likes lesbian porn should love Sapphic Erotica. They at least have returned to their more classic style of shooting. I watched a scene earlier between two women I'm not familiar with, Talia Mint (sounds familiar to me) and Vanna Bardot, full scene of fully dressed to kissing, undressing each other, lots of touching that gets rougher and where these scenes stand out just like they did in their heyday, after both orgasm, they're still laying there together, naked, kissing and lightly touching each other. There's a high level of eroticism in these scenes. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone who likes In the Crack and anyone who likes lesbian porn that doesn't come off as too scripted. Would also recommend it to any women who are wondering if they're bi-curious, pretty sure the tagline to women viewers on Sapphic's scenes was, "If you weren't bi-curious, you will be soon." Meaning it's also female-friendly porn. I'm just learning about the genre so bare with me. Very good price from TBP/PU too. I used to pay $29.95 for each of these sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Talk about a site that hits a homerun with the models and pairing of multiple females. Maybe the best casting I’ve seen.
- It has only 50 scenes and at least 45 of those are worth downloading.
- Scenery and settings in the scenes are almost as pretty as the models.
- For some reason I’m getting good download speeds on this site (80% of max).
- These are almost all threesomes or more scenes.
- Navigation is simple and easy to use.
Cons:
- That damn guy. Charles Dera. Out of all the good casting of the female pairings, why in the name of all things holy would you put him with Abigail Mac and Madelyn Monroe?
- It’s not updating but well worth the downloading of the scenes they have.
- Lots of promotion of their other sites that used to all be on one network.
Bottom Line:
*Score is a little high due to how many of my (subjective) favorite models are on this site.*
I’m having to work through the laughing about listing Charles Dera as a con. There was Lee Stone’s broke dick. There was Choky Ice’s personality of a chunk of ice and there’s Charles Dera’s flippy mohawk that I think is made from brick and it accidentally hit him in the face. Porn needs to hire a guy that can say, “That guy is going to ruin the scene. Keep his ugly ass out of the camera lens!”
But the pretty models really make this site. You have pairings of models like this: Vicki Chase and Eliza Ibarra or Valentina Nappi, Karma Rx and Athena Faris or Alina Lopez and Gia Milana and the one they tried to kill me with: Jade Kush and Ember Snow. I guess that’s why they can stick Charles Dera in those scenes. Let’s just work on getting him out of the camera. The models are as good on this site as any site I’ve been on. The only scam is Charles Dera. I don’t get the stories in these scenes.
The truth is the stories are really bad and you’re just here for the models on this site. This is one of those sites that you don’t care what the story is. There are real estate agents (the female models), they’re having sex with the supposed to be client looking to buy the house. The good part about that poor story is the houses and pools and scenery is very pretty, and a lot of the scenes have outdoors parts.
Of the 50 scenes: Three are solo scenes. The rest are at a minimum of threesome (m/f/f) and quite a few have more than 3 women in them. I’m guessing this site really interests me because of models that are in more than one scene. Cindy Starfall, who is one of my all-time favorites, very underrated models, is in 7 of the 50 scenes. She doesn’t have that many scenes on all sites combined. There are several Gina Valentina scenes. If those models are not a big deal to you, you might not like this site as much as I do. If you like curvy butts, one scene has Abella Danger and Zoe Monroe. I hope that it shows how important the models on this site are to my score and my overall positivity towards this site. If you don’t have a good story or something to hold the scene up, put several pretty models in it and that will work.
The scenes can all be downloaded in 240, 480, 720 and 1080. The pictures aren’t worth fooling with. You would be just well off to use a media player that takes screenshots. I will mention because I know she has her fans; Karma Rx has several scenes on here too and she performs really well in those. I have noticed her performances vary. The ones on here are some of her best work. I think she works better with another female and male. It’s like it brings her competitive side to outperform the other female. The scenes are also long, most are over 30 minutes. This, to me, is one of those hidden treasure sites. The three solo scenes, even though I like solo porn, are nothing special. The other 47 are good. It’s a site that I would recommend and join (once) even if it was just a standalone site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The forever popular (with me) niche of a guy having his girlfriend sell herself for him. Don’t judge until you read the bottom line.
- They’re updating once per month and have 284 scenes with this same theme, in their archive.
- It’s the switch-a-roo pro of the fetish/niche sells it, not the looks or performances.
- They don’t speak English, but there are subtitles. Who would have guessed the best invention in porn was putting words on the screen?
- Download speeds are surprisingly good, years ago, that was not the case with this site or the network it’s now part of.
- Navigation is good, but they could do more with it (see bottom line).
- Newer scenes have up to 4K downloads.
- Site design, though outdated, is also uncluttered with no ads and simple interface.
- Downloadable photosets.
Cons:
- I don’t know when all of these sites came together to form a network, but because it is a thrown-together network you get some navigation frustration. Again, see in the bottom line.
- Some may not be impressed with what looks like B-level settings, but it fits this niche for me.
Bottom Line:
Most of these scenes start with the female either looking at her boyfriend/husband like he’s crazy. Some of the females look like they like the idea of having sex with another man. Some are reluctant. You do not need words to see their reactions and expressions. The scenes, to me, take on a light form of cuckolding. The boyfriend/husband selling his girlfriend/wife often sits right beside the man having sex with his wife/girlfriend. Sometimes the selling man looks disappointed like he didn’t know what he was getting himself into. Other times the selling man gets so turned on he pulls his dick out and starts masturbating while watching the other man have sex with his girlfriend/wife. This is a niche and form of porn that was created long ago. It’s not some kind of reality porn that is 100% fantasy. I don’t remember when the movie, “Indecent Proposal” came out but it’s like someone watched that and thought, “That would make for an interesting porn scene.” It does.
I am critically open about myself and the interest I have in fantasies of catching my girlfriend/wife with another man. It’s adrenaline. It’s a challenge to our deepest core. This site does a very good job of creating a believable scenario with believably real (not professional looking) actors and actresses. We have all been a member of a site with swinging or older/younger, the lighter taboo subjects these days and thought, “Yeah, that’s just not believable”. I don’t get that on this site and never have.
The technical side has improved a lot since my last time as a member. It still has its problems, but quality isn’t one of those. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080, 720, 480 and mobile in .mp4 format. The scenes can also be downloaded in an HD .wmv file and a tiny .wmv file.
The photosets are there and downloadable. Nothing really groundbreaking and do look like they are just stills from the video. You do get some nostalgia with a large watermark in the bottom right hand corner of every photo … remember those days?
The navigation complaint is based on this being a thrown-together network. When on Sell My GF, there is a useful tab that says “Movies”. It shows that if you click that, there are 284 movies on the site. Next to the movies tab is “Models” it lists 2,265. The model list on Sell Your GF is for the entire network. That is a problem from me but nothing too major. I looked the network itself up, I joined through Young Libertines, not even realizing there’s a network. You will be able to see from the sites I review from the network that my interest is just on a handful of the sites. The network is 18 Videoz. The TBP date of this network launching may be right but 18 Videoz didn’t used to contain all these sites. The sites I will be reviewing are directly tied to Young Libertines. Which, I assume, 18 Videoz purchased in 2017, when 18 Videoz was first listed on TBP.
What makes Sell My GF really good isn’t that I believe the real boyfriend really is selling his girlfriend out. It’s the believable content. The female models that look at their boyfriends like they don’t want to moan or make him think they are enjoying it. This is, as I have talked to other PU members about, the line, betrayal porn should have been drawn at. Of course, other sites went further and went into shaming and getting the niche of revenge porn banned. This site stays within that happy area of maybe it is a real couple, maybe he really is upset about selling his girlfriend, maybe she really is excited about getting to be with another man. They leave it up to the viewer instead of the revenge type sites where the sites were having scripted fights end the scenes. This one, at its best, makes me think of a college couple that needs some money to buy a few days of groceries with. At its worst, it reminds me of a boyfriend just setting his girlfriend up to cheat on him so he can have reason to break up with her. The score is helped by the much improved technical quality on the videos. A barely there update schedule and good size archive of 250+ scenes. You know what you’re getting with every scene. There isn’t a wasted or experimental scene on the site. Those into betrayal porn, I know we have several members who are, you need to look into this outdated looking network that’s producing some of the best porn available … if you’re into this niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s headlined by Oldje which I have separate review for. These are the bonus sites and it’s called the Sensual Girl Network.
- You get a mixture of quite a few niches on this network.
- I’m going to not include much about Oldje, one of the bonus sites, Class Nudes, is still updating too.
- Video quality overall is good to very good and Oldje even has 4K (will detail in the bottom line)
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Navigation is really good considering especially they have integrated four sites into one under the Sensual Girl Network name and you can jump from to another. Which should be standard these days but a lot of networks don’t see it that way. This one does.
- If you’re a picture collector you’re in for a treat with the Class Nudes site.
Cons:
- Two of the sites are not updating but the videos on those have at least 720p option. And the niches those cover are not that common.
- The videos on Class Nudes are not even worth looking at. (I will explain below)
Bottom Line:
This is very interesting to me. Oldje is the headlining site and I gave it a 93. I’m going to try and review just the other sites on the Sensual Girl Network in this review. But you do get Oldje with it but you don’t get Oldje 3-Some. If they added that to this I would be upper 90s on it.
The three other sites are Class Nudes, Class 3-somes and Class Blowjobs. Class Nudes is still updating. It’s kind of like the artsy sites. The videos are very tame. The newer videos are not even videos. Those are video of the pictures. Some of the older ones are a little more involved videos but still tame. What makes that interesting is most of these models also appear in scenes on Oldje. I think that’s the best part of Class Nudes. You can see these women in more glamorous type pictures then watch their hardcore scene with an older guy. I have wondered about the professionals or amateurs part. On Class Nudes there are quite a few pro models from the past especially. I noticed Black Angelica, Nataly Von, one of my all-time favorites, she gets my vote for best eyes in porn, Aleska Diamond. It may just be that I don’t know a lot of the newer models. I’ve told it before, I’ve had trouble keeping up with the newer models.
You can download the photo sets which are very good. The high resolution download option has photos that are 3500 long end. They’re professional level photosets, usually pretty scenery. There are a total of 439 photosets as of 9/25/21 and like I said there are videos but there’s no way I’m going to click them all to see how many are just videos of pictures and how many are just tame videos. I haven’t seen any of the videos with much explicitness. That’s why I like that most of these models have hardcore scenes on Oldje which comes with the network. When I talked about the good navigation. If you click on a model’s photo set on Class Nudes and she has a video on Oldje, it shows up for you to click and go right to it.
The other two sites included are not updating. They are worth checking out. The Class 3-Some is not older/younger. It’s mostly two women with one man and the women are very attractive. I may be biased. Some of my favorite models from 8-10 years ago were nearly all European and I think all of these models are European. I liked that European look from around 2008-2013. It has 80 scenes on it and that includes a video that maxes out at 720p download, which is acceptable to me and my preferred video resolution. The scenes also come with a photoset you can download with those being 4000 long end. This was once a seriously premium website. I would go far as saying this network is doing what I think all networks should be like.
The other site is Class Blowjob. This one has 60 scenes on it and this is not your average blowjob site. There is rimming, swallowing and beginners. Then they tried the humor with “dong lifter”. Leave the humor to me. The models are very pretty. Some of the videos have 540, 720 and 1080. Some have 270, 540 and 720. All of them have at least 720p. These sites add to what I said was the headlining site Oldje. They’re giving you a little different genre here with these extra sites. I like how Class Nudes ties in with Oldje. Then, the blowjob and Class 3-Somes give you less of the old/young of Oldje if you get tired of watching an old guy having fun. I expected Oldje to be good but will say the network it comes with is not real big and that’s what makes it good. It’s high quality porn too. I rated it just a little over Oldje. You all know I’m bad about scoring a single site from a network higher than I score a network because to me, a lot of networks take away from the headlining site. This one doesn’t. It adds more to the headlining site.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It was once my highest rated site, then fell out of favor, seems to be taking a different turn now.
- The growth of this site has to be one of the most impressive and fastest we have seen. Daily updates currently and the quality is as high as you get.
- As of 12/7/21: 785 models, 1,573 videos/films and 2,036 photosets.
- Everything is downloadable and as far as I know, unlimited. I don’t download enough anymore to really know.
- While its big sister site Met Art has become more explicit in recent years, Sex Art has been more explicit since the first scene. I will focus a little more on that in the bottom line.
- The technical quality is very high and it will be in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
Cons:
- Don’t hate me for saying this. I still don’t like the hardcore scenes. I like hardcore porn as much as most do, but hardcore porn is everywhere. I would be fine with this being a solo/lesbian site.
- Their memberships can be confusing when upgrading or adding. I will explain that in the bottom line since I know they usually have a webmaster that checks in here.
Bottom Line:
I remember the days of thinking Met Art could be a lot more than it was. I even remember making comments about Met Art at least getting the attention of my side that likes teasing. Sex Art came along and showed what Met Art could be. It was kind of surprising to me that Met Art then started shooting more explicit photos. It was like Sex Art tested the waters. The early years of Sex Art were kind of messy. They were trying too hard. Take that as a compliment. I don’t remember who said it, “It’s still just porn and about nudity.” Sadly, that’s probably as far as we will get in our lifetimes but will say Sex Art does a very good job of blending the more innocent porn with the not innocent porn.
I don’t feel like much of an explanation is needed for why I don’t like the hardcore scenes. It’s just a feeling I have. It’s not bad hardcore porn. It’s just kind of there. I don’t like mentioning other sites in a review of a different site but I feel the same way about FTV adding hardcore. And didn’t ALS Scan try it too? The hardcore on sites that are rooted in softcore, to me, is a bad marketing idea. I will just say take any hardcore major network you know of. Would their fans be happy about a solo scene?
The bad part is it does seem like the number of hardcore scenes are increasing. Or I should say the percentage of new updates featuring hardcore scenes is increasing.
The confusing part with memberships and add-ons. There’s a good chance I was able to join two of their other sites on Black Friday prices. I joined Viv Thomas and Met Art for $5 each. I was thinking maybe I would add ALS Scan since I haven’t been on it in a long time. I clicked to add it and received this choice: $39.99 per month or $100 for a year. I haven’t paid $40 for a site since those very rare Japanese sites. And have never seen ALS Scan priced at $40 per month. I just thought it was strange that I was able to add those others at $5 per month. Not that I think ALS Scan or any of these sites should be $5. These sites stand on their own strongly at even $20 per month.
My favorite part of Sex Art are the pictures. The newer photosets are downloadable in multiple resolutions but the high one has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution and they have a nice blend of portrait and landscape orientated photos. The settings are usually pretty and even will use the word, neutral, so you don’t get the clash between the models and colors in the background. I don’t even know if it’s a compliment to tell a Met Art site its pictures are my favorite part. The videos are as impressive in technical quality at 4K, 1080, 720, 360 and 260. The videos have some story to them but are not as long as I expect from story-driven porn. Most of the newer hardcore videos are under 30 minutes. I’m going to just focus on one and it’s a newer one. It is titled, “Just Relax” and the screencap has a very nice view of Lilly Bella standing, pulling her panties and it’s from behind her. That looked like it was going to be a solo scene. I then clicked the video. I stream everything before downloading. The scene starts with male Maxmillian Dior. I hate showing my impulsive side this much but I just closed it. If you wonder why I would think it was solo, it’s the only one of the last 20 scenes that just shows a female in the preview screencap.
That is going to be the problem I have. From what I can tell, Sex Art is now almost exclusively hardcore male/female or lesbian. I am guessing the new solo content is on Met Art X, which is fine, but it shows how much this site has changed (for good and bad, in my opinion). I do know the bigger picture is to just join the entire Met Art Network and then you’ll get everything.
I’m not going to knock the score down on it just for that personal preference. The content here is very good if you like hardcore that’s not offensive (which I do) and aren’t expecting the solo scenes that used to be more common on here. I was starting to think I just thought there was less hardcore on this site but using the tags, it shows 291 “boy-girl” scenes and all 291 of those with that tag started in 2019. The site has been around since 2013 or 2012. There’s a chance the tags aren’t 100% accurate but you can see that the last two and a half years have produced nearly 300 boy-girl scenes.
It’s still a top quality site, preferences aside, I just can’t score it as high as I used to. This used to be a 96-99 site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily
Cons:
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads.
Bottom Line:
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn
Thanks Witty, I've had a lot of trouble ever really getting into heartcore. I don't remember which of the heartcore sites it was, but one had the same guy in three straight scenes ... with three different women. Sex Art was very bad for the no lead-up. They've seemingly gotten around this by laying out a basis/theme for their scenes now. It at least makes a little sense, but I have to shut off whatever skeptical thoughts enter my mind on most scenes.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high production value content. The closer to hardcore sister site of Met-Art.
- All videos (566 as of 1/18/2016)have up to 1080p option. Downloadable in four different qualities. See Bottom Line.
- All photo sets (824 as of 1/18/2016)are downloadable in three different resolutions and are zipped.
- Daily update(s). One day is a photo set. The next is a video and the video update comes with accompanying photo set.
- Download speeds are consistently very good (90%+ of max download speed).
- Good blend of genres: Solo, lesbian, straight and threesomes.
- Models are generally very pretty and natural.
- Easy to add other sites owned by Met-Art and the discounts are good.
Cons:
- Maybe half the scenes feel formulaic. This could be a personal thing, but I've always had trouble grasping the concept of the heartcore genre.
- Could use a better search engine. Though I'm admittedly nitpicking.
- For some reason, the site likes to forget my login information and make me re-enter it, but it only happens every few days.
Bottom Line:
Back when Sex-Art first opened (2012), I reviewed it and said something about the almost limitless potential it has. They are now reaching very high. This is the concept of the site. It's an artsy site that loses a little control and becomes heartcore.
Everything about the content reminds me of Met-Art except that losing control part. The one expected problem is there and I've thought this problem appears on all heartcore sites ... if you're bringing love and mushiness into porn, it needs to be believable. Not to knock porn stars, but they aren't the best actors. Luckily, a lot of the couples, even threesomes, do have good chemistry and pull off some believable scenes.
One of my biggest complaints about Sex-Art a few years ago was their "series" movies. It just seemed like they were trying way too hard to create scenes that when put together created a series or full movie. Those are now tucked away on the site in a section to themselves and haven't been updated since 2012. They're still creating the series style of videos, but they're no longer trying to create a cohesive movie out of them. They just follow the same premise as the other scenes in the series.
Artsy scenes still make their way into the updates, but they're not near as silly or staged.
I'll admit, I have problems with the heartcore genre, but I think Sex-Art does it better than any of the others I've tried. I especially like the threesome scenes where one woman is playing the role of the friend who is watching then gets involved.
There are solo scenes that I also like. The recent Vox series of solo scenes reminds me a lot of sites like I Feel Myself where the camera focuses on the face of the model, but Sex-Art then also shows the rest of the model as well.
So, in terms of their actual content, I think they've improved a great deal over the last few years.
On the technical side of things, there really can't be much better than what Sex-Art offers.
Photo sets are available in zips at:
Low - 1024 high end, Medium - 2048 high end and High - 5600+ high end.
Videos are available in:
280p, 360p, 720p and 1080p. It's worth noting, there are scenes that have the 4K option as well, but there's no way for me to filter those down to get an exact number.
The search engine is my only real con and it's minor. You can just open all new updates in order or search by model name or go to a model list. This is where it gets a little frustrating. In the advanced search, you can search for number of performers, but there's no way to narrow those results down any further.
For example: Number of performers 2+, will open up all scenes with 2+ performers, but you can't then say, "Only lesbian" or "threesomes". Trust me, it's nitpicking and I know that, but it could hinder your search a little.
One of the things I like about Sex-Art is that nearly every scene starts with the performers dressed. This was long a complaint of mine about Met-Art and sets that start nude.
It's very hard to find anything other than nitpicking faults with Sex-Art. I've been a member for 6 straight months now and after a few months break, I'll probably go back for the year membership.
Also worth mentioning they do go into more genres despite being a heartcore site. There's light bondage in the girl/girl/group scenes and there isn't as much mushiness as most heartcore sites have. If you insist on another personal complaint, there's hardly a curvy woman to be found. This is very similar to Met-Art and should be the only thing stopping potential members from trying it.
As I had joked about with others on here. I'm not for sure I like paying for the enjoyment of sex. I'm mainly saying, what I saw on the site isn't any different than the sex I have in life. I still think they will succeed with the site in the long run. On the boy/girl ones, my main complaint was on videos. I prefer the female only photosets.
As Pink Panther mentioned, Evil Angel has an original movie/series that would cover more what you're looking for. I enjoyed it and it may have even hurt my view of Kamikaze Love.
Not only distinguishing it as season 1, but on the last one in the list it still says updates weekly.
The good thing, it at least looks like they are now releasing more b/g sets. I think you know by my review that I am glad KL is over and won't be seeing a sequel. If I was to say, I would guess they got ahead of themselves with the excitement of the new site and tried to do too much. If it was just about anyone besides Met-Art, I would have scored the site lower since I wouldn't expect most sites to be able to refocus, but it does look like Met is doing so now.
Maybe the review did some good. Right after my membership ran out and I posted this review, six of their next eight scenes were boy/girl. With the other two being girl/girl. So maybe there is still hope for them delivering on a more hardcore site. On the other hand, one of those new ones has the female model covered in "stone" like a classic art statue. Those overly artsy sets alone push me away. I haven't even liked most bodypaint sets in the past. And the scenes give you a feeling you're supposed to watch from beginning to end, but I didn't find much story in them to keep me that interested.
If Porn Pros sticks to this niche on a couple of their sites, I would recommend it since they are coming from the typical hardcore, even sometimes extreme hardcore genre, but there's no telling with them since they just kind of sprung the softer hardcore on members with no warning. I'm guessing they will stop shooting it without warning too or start a separate site that requires a separate membership to access.
I've heard the most good about X-Art, but as I've told the others, their models hold them back for me since I still don't care for the tiny, slim models as my only option.
I guess I will have to eventually try X-Art out. I wish they would get a few more ethnic or exotic models. And watered down was my feeling exactly with Sex Art. There were a few scenes that showed potential. One is a threesome with Malena Morgan, she masturbates while watching a guy/girl have sex then gets involved right near the end. There was maybe a little feeling of domination from that scene since the girl with the guy was trying to keep his attention on her, but he kept looking at Malena. Another that has Riley Reid in it is very good.
I still think most men would be shocked if they knew open women. The 4 women all work in the psychology field and discuss nearly everything openly. I sometimes think they're bigger pervs than the men I know.
It's kind of funny. I always wanted this genre and thought Viv Thomas Videos was the closest to pulling it off on a regular basis, but two months of Sex Art, has made me reconsider if I would really want this type of porn on a regular basis. I still haven't tried X-Art, but a lot of that is based more on me not seeing enough models that interest me on their site since it does look like they have a style I would like. The other problem with the niche is probably one that porn always has. Once one site does a niche well, you get dozens more trying to mimic it and you either get tired of it or the sites go overboard with the niche.
I have always found those 18-22 aged models cute, pretty, but it's just so rare to find any of them who make me believe they could get guys to have sex with them with anything beyond just their looks. Which is also why I thought Viv Thomas pulled this niche off well. Most of his models are mid to late 20s Euro models, but even with his site, I haven't been on it in a few years.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons:
- Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line:
I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.
It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.
They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.
Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.
Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.
So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.
The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).
The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.
It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.
I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.
I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.
I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.
I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
That's alright on the humor part. I must not have caught the GB on it, meant MB. I do prefer the smaller videos and rarely download the HD versions just to save space. While I have quite a bit of space, it's starting to become a hassle trying to keep up with the different hard drives and what is on each one. I used to have a huge collection compared to most, but most of the newer PUs here are blowing me away in hard drive space, servers, I'm still under 10 TB total.
Skin is my favorite newer model, but I haven't downloaded anything of her on Evil Angel yet, but will now. I didn't even realize Sandy was on there, putting her in a scene with Skin sounds too good to be true!
I was about to post a comment about my newfound interest in Evil Angel, a site, I had only added on my Videobox account before and never thought I would join outright by itself. I like the Voracious one. I'm pretty sure my problem with Kamikaze Love was that I had never seen Kayla Love, or at least I don't remember seeing her before and was hoping for a lot more of her in the scenes.
And to my surprise, I seem to be leaning more away from the softcore. My last 3 joins have been 2 Kink sites and Evil Angel. I would like to think my taste is becoming more sophisticated, but I'm guessing 9 out of 10 people would disagree!
Would it make a huge difference in crispness if I have a high end PC? I just bought the one I'm using a few months ago and it has very high specs. Seems to make everything look really good. And I agree, I thought the filesizes looked really strange for 1920x1080 videos at 4000 bitrate. I haven't been back to the site after downloading all the photo sets, which are very good, but will stop back in and download the videos towards the end of my membership to at least give them a fair second chance before reviewing it.
Hey slutty, I probably could have went into that deeper than I did and will in my review. One of the big selling points of Sex Art is that it is much more erotic than your average hardcore porn scene. Considering the scenes I downloaded are 1920x1080 quality, that would automatically make the file sizes bigger, but the scenes, to me, are extremely short to be sold as "erotic". Very little story, very little talking and the sex lasts 8-12 minutes. My complaint isn't so much with the file size as it is with the scenes being very short and not being very erotic, the filesize was used more to show just how short the scenes are. If it were a 640x480 resolution clip, I wouldn't think much about the smaller file size, but at true HD, it shows how short the scenes are by showing the smaller file size.
And what you ask at the end is the interesting part. The videos are very crisp, I mentioned maybe they are optimizing bitrates or using some kind of trick to get the best quality at a small filesize. The files are listing Codec: H264-MPEG4 AVC. Bitrate is 4215 kb/s. As an example of what I was saying, the video I got that info from is a solo video. The model is fully dressed and walking in her apartment/house, she is fully nude by 1:42. The entire scene is 8:38. I hate to beat a dead horse, but it seems like erotic videos would have more than 1:42 of fully dressed to fully nude, with teasing, stripping, etc...
I have a 2 month membership so I will give them the full 2 months before reviewing it since my review wouldn't be that fair or even that positive right now.
The quality is very high. I really like the photo sets as well. The ones I have downloaded top out near 6000 long end on the pictures.
Video quality is very high as well, though a little confusing. I don't know if they are doing something to optimize bitrates/file size, but full length 1920x1080 files are only 200-300 MB.
One reason the video files are small is because the time of the videos. I haven't seen a video over 20 minutes yet and the average seems to be in the 14-15 minute range.
As I had worried would be the case, the picture sets are better than the videos. I believe the basis of this site is really good, but it's going to take nearly perfect execution to pull it off. Most of the models, especially females, are younger 18-22 range, and I'm not for sure how believable an 18-22 year old can be when it comes to passionate sex.
To my surprise, there isn't much dialogue or story with the scenes which was something I was expecting a lot of. On the other hand, there is the Kamikaze Love series, which I downloaded all of, only to end up deleting all of because it was like watching an HBO after dark movie.
I will give it the two months before reviewing it with the chance maybe their steady updates will start showing some improvement.
This is very interesting. I last downloaded a scene on there on 4/23/2021. After reading your question, I signed in and there are no downloads on videos. Photos can still be downloaded. The one thing that changed between 4/23/2021 and today is I canceled my account with them on 4/24/2021. Have you canceled your account? I'm wondering if they're removing downloading rights once the member cancels. I still have a week or so left on my account. I will send their support an email and see if I get a response. If I don't and if they don't return the downloads, I will be lowering my score on this site by 15 to 20 points just for them stopping downloads. Thanks for the heads up on this.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
