Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of solo sites and megasites? Is that the right word?
- They advertise 72 sites. My first experience with Puba was just focused on their solo sites.
- Their numbers say 3,433 videos, 2,755 photosets.
- They have a coming soon section and the update they show is listed for today.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of my max)
- I’m going to list this as a pro and a mention to read the bottom line, a lot of mainstream pornstars have solo sites on this network. They do advertise that their videos are exclusive.
Cons:
- As minimal as you can get on navigation features. There’s a search box if you know what you’re searching for.
- No model list, though if you click on a model’s name it will show you all the scenes they have of that model.
- No dates on the scenes. One continuously moving ad.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Staxxx, it’s owned by the same people as this site, and I was able to get a deal to join both for under $10. Puba, several years ago, was building some momentum. I know when Skin Diamond first started being recognized as a model, Puba has a Skin Diamond solo site. Another model I remember Charley Chase. They have a solo site of her. Christy Mack, Abigail Mac and a total of near 60 different models that they have solo sites of. Most of those models are known models. One thing I know I was bothered by, and this gave me a chance to see if they still do it. They take a photo set and split it into multiple parts to jack up their photoset numbers. Anyone that has been reviewing porn as long as I have, that’s one of those things that irritates me. I even mentioned in the review of Skin Diamond’s solo site from Puba’s network. She has a Dr. Who photoset. Skin was and still is, in my opinion, a unique looking model. Puba has 45 of the photos in one Dr. Who set and 166 in another Dr. Who set. She has on the same outfit. The only thing that has changed is the background. I’ve said it before, when you do things like that, you just ask for a reviewer to look deeper into what else you may be getting away with. I don’t look that deeply into anymore. I do have compliments for their photosets.
The around 60 solo sites are still the main part of the network. They have added sites like, “1 Girl, 1 Camera” and “My Doll Parts”. It’s hard to be negative about a site that costs $5 a month. If you haven’t joined it and like one or more of the solo model sites they have. You get your money’s worth on one of those sites. Some of those solo sites have as many as 100+ videos and 100+ photosets. Going back to the mid-2000s, that would be an acceptable-sized premium solo site. And you get near 60 of those.
One of the sites they have that I was interested in checking out is Ty Endicott. He had a POV scene with Micah Moore that was one of my favorite scenes. It shows the age of some of the scenes. Most of the Ty Endicott videos featured smoking fetish. I don’t think the Micah Moore scene I was looking for had smoking in it, unless you counted her bubble butt with her knee high socks bouncing up and down. You can also notice on Ty Endicott scenes, nearly half, maybe more than half, of the models have a tramp-stamp tattoo. The most positive thing I can say about this network, besides the price, is the solo model content. Several of these models are known for hardcore. Puba does have some solo scenes of them and some showering scenes. What I described as megasites, are like their site Czech Hotties, it has 131 scenes. Those are just sites that look like a back catalog of a DVD series. You probably won’t see the same model in more than one scene on that site. We used to call those megasites for the large amount of models, as the opposite of solo model sites.
They do have 1080, 720 HD downloads, some of the older scenes only has 540 and 480. I watched a 540p video the other day and my friend said, “What kind of television did that fit on?” We’re getting old. Get rid of that 540p and it’s 4:3 ratio. The photosets have zip downloads. I said it was Staxxx, there’s no reason to change my tune on this one. You will get $5 worth of porn out of the site. If you like those solo models you will easily get $5. They have added some newer solo models too. I didn’t even recognize Leya Falcon. I’m used to her being pancaked between 3 guys. She has some photos on here of her cosplaying as Harley Quinn. She’s using the name Whorely Quinn. See, what I said wasn’t offensive about her being pancaked between 3 men. She is quite attractive by herself. She makes a good Harley Quinn. Just like with Staxxx you have to send an email to cancel. They do respond quickly. I would compare this experience to eating a handful of cheese puffs when you’re starving. Recommended for those that like solo model porn and check the list to see how many if any of the solo sites that have a featured model you like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the rare networks of solo sites, also has around 10 regular but small porn studios and sites included.
- The biggest appeal here is to collectors or collecting types. There are 60 solo model "sites". Details in bottom line.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- A lot of content with nearly 3,000 videos and 2,500 photo sets.
- The updates are hard to follow but according to the future releases, tomorrow, 7/8/19 there will be 16 videos and 13 photo sets released. See bottom line.
- Navigation is simple to use with a clean interface and easy to use and understand menus.
- I am going by what the site says and also referring back to the previous TBP review, this content is exclusive to Puba. There are some models I have never seen before so I can't guarantee that but there's reason to believe it is exclusive.
- The lowest "hi" videos I have found are 720p, so that's not bad. Some could be lower but I have not seen them.
Cons:
- The only scenes with dates on them are the ones going to be released in the next month. Nothing else is dated.
- I have downloaded a couple of photo sets that will not unzip and say files are damaged or corrupted. See bottom line for possible fix.
- The numbers, reasoning ability and mathematical logic says there might be some recycling, see bottom line.
Bottom Line:
No matter what my score is or whatever I find in the recycling possibility, this is still an inexpensive site for you to add to your collections of certain models.
In the April, 2017 TBP update of facts there are 2,000+ plus videos listed in the facts. As of July, 2019 there are 2,824 videos listed according to Puba's own numbers. They are releasing 16 videos tomorrow. The other days of the upcoming week have 5 listed for each day. Even if I cut way short of those numbers and just say 20 videos per month, that would be over 1,000 videos in one year. Comparing their numbers with TBP's 2017 numbers there are at most 800 new videos in the last 2 years.
The point I made at the beginning of this review isn't to be lost in all of this. This is still a site with a lot of exclusive content of 60 different models. There is no way I am going to go through and list all of them.
The ones I was most interested are: Skin Diamond, Charley Chase, London Keyes, Mia Lelani, Nicole Aniston and Jayden Cole. Of those, the one with the lowest amount of total content on here is Mia Lelani with 39 photo sets and 28 videos. Skin has 54 photo sets and 35 videos. Nicole has 47 photo sets and 76 videos. It's a lot of exclusive content for single models.
Which is the first question you have to ask yourself. Are there any models on Puba you really like? I will mention this here as it fits here and goes back to one of the cons. The photo sets are rare for some of these models. I do not have a lot of photo sets of Nicole Aniston or Skin Diamond (most I have are from her pre-hardcore days). The zip files were showing up as broken or corrupted. It had something to do with me left-clicking to download. I right clicked "save as" the zips and they unzip fine and are above average photos, especially of the ones that do not do a lot of photo sets.
The studio sites might be of interest to some. I remember having scenes from a Ty Endicott POV DVD, here on Puba they have 63 Ty Endicott scenes. They have one called Czech Hotties with 130 videos on it.
The solo model scenes are either vanilla hardcore scenes with guys, JOI (jerk off instruction) solo or with another model or solo. Most of these models are not known for their solo scenes, so those are relatively unique for some of the more prolific hardcore models.
There are other models I know of but do not usually collect like Keisha Grey, she has one of the lower content counts with 19 videos, 18 photo sets. The highest looks to be Jayden Cole with 76 videos and 71 photo sets. These "sites" remind me of the old solo sites with the word "Club" in front of the model's name.
The navigation works well for this type of site. They took the keep it simple, stupid, method of navigation. There's a menu on the left, you click it and have choices of videos, photos, sites and coming soon.
The easiest way to navigate the site is to go to "sites" and pick the models you like. Each "site" of a model opens with photos, videos options. It's as simple as that.
The content I like best are the Skin Diamond photo sets. I have liked her since the very first set I saw of her way back on ATK Exotics when she looked one day over 18. Her photo sets on here include several cosplay sets including Dr. Who, Star Wars, a nerdy teacher, a schoolgirl and a very odd bathtub zombie/abused looking set with blood, black eyes, fully nude in a tub.
The biggest deduction is like another recent review. The videos and photos are split into parts. Skin as fully dressed Jedi in one, Skin stripping as a Jedi in the next. I have said it before when a site does something to make me question their motive, usually more is looked into and uncovered. If the separate sets of photos had 200 pictures in each it would maybe be understandable but the dressed Jedi set has only 51 pictures while the stripping/nude Jedi has around 200.
There is a similar use of the videos as well. There are three of Nicole Aniston and another model giving you jerk off instruction. It looks like the three were made on the same day in different outfits.
Overall, if you're a collector of any of these models it is still a good deal if you get a promo. The content isn't going to make you think you have found something unique in porn but you will at least get some new photos and/or videos to add to your collection. It's a painless, smooth site to use so you won't have to struggle through pages of unneeded clicking and scrolling either.
There are ads but most are not bothersome. They have them in a row in 3 places as you scroll down the homepage. There are no ads once you are inside a specific site, just on the homepage.
I'm not for sure if it has much for returning members. I would think one month would be enough to get any of the models you collect and there probably wouldn't be enough future content to come back for. Good enough for one month if you are a fan of any of the models or for someone looking for some new favorite models.
Thanks for this information. I had wondered on the DL limit since it reminded me of how Bang Bros and Reality Kings used to list theirs by site and number of "big" videos. My main interest would be Charley and London though I would still check out the others. Charley is a really good, fun live performer, I hadn't noticed much about her until seeing a scene on Asses in Public where she showed a really playful side. Then saw the archived "live" videos of her on Naughty America and really liked those as well.
I'm still going to consider this network, but not until I join a few others that I have been meaning to join. The live shows wouldn't work with my schedule at all. I used to have that same problem when we lived in California since the live shows would air while I was at work. Now on the east coast of the United States, it still will be airing while I'm working, headed home from work. Again, thanks for the information it will be very useful to me.
For about 4 months, I have clicked on this network, considered, re-considered. My original interest in the network is the inclusion of two of my favorites, Charley Chase and London Keyes, but things still seem to be a bit different. I was thinking there was a discount before, but could be wrong. I also notice that they now offer a 5 day trial for $5 instead of the $1 trial, since there seemed to be some confusion over the trial earlier, this makes it more confusing!
I have really started to like watching the webcam shows, but I can't ever see one live since they seem to have them about an hour before I get home from work.
My first question is, does this network include archive videos of the webcam shows? I found that feature really nice on a few other similar network of solo sites.
Second question is, does anyone know if the $5 trial is full access since the $1 one wasn't? I very rarely use trials, but with the $30 price and having been burnt with the last few sites I joined, it would be nice to know what I'm getting into before getting into it.
Third, this download limit that I noticed on Charley's site info. Is that daily limit cumulative across all the sites or is it a limit per site per day?
One that I think might be a little touchy here in North American is the Western Chikan website. They use CCBill but I don't think it's ever been listed on TBP or PU. Chikan is known as the Japanese bus/train groping sites. Those wouldn't be that popular here since they are censored. The Western Chikan site isn't censored and it has the train/bus groping, touching of all sorts, sex on the train/bus with people watching but I do know it's not the most-accepted form of porn in our Western society since it can look "forced".
A much more accessible option is the Porn Doe Network. I discovered the network and these sites by accident awhile back.
They have Chicas Loco which is a public sex site set in bookstores, bars, diners but I will say these are very controlled environments with sometimes less than 5 people watching.
Also on Porn Doe is Crowd Bondage. This is the direct ripoff of Public Disgrace. Some of the humiliation goes beyond my threshold for enjoyment. Including at least a couple of scenes where the "public" drops their cigarette ashes in the model's mouth while she has sex. They do the scenes with random people squirting the model's face with water hoses. Their scenes, especially at first glance, could easily pass as Public Disgrace scenes with most of the male talent wearing all black clothing. But even these scenes end up in very controlled environments.
Still, if you ever join Porn Doe's Network they're worth checking out.
JP Outdoor has some good "public" Japanese scenes that are uncensored but these are much tamer than Public Disgrace.
Cum Louder, a once promising network that is a mess now, has Latin Asses in Public, used to be known as Publico Culoes, that has the scenes where they walk a naked or flashing woman through the streets of the big cities in Europe. I'll put a link to this one because it's hard to find the content on their site. Even with the search supposed to only show Latin Asses in Public, you'll see that there's plain hardcore scenes mixed in the results too but you'll see the public ones too.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I always seem to return to. Thought it would be a good choice to get my 500th experience point here on PU.
- It's a site that can't really be explained by just a simple title like "Public Disgrace".
- Around 360 full scenes, videos and photos for all the scenes.
- You'll see scenarios used in the scenes that you've probably thought about and some that you'll start thinking about.
- Site works well, but it's also pretty basic, scroll, download, scroll, download. Using the navigational buttons isn't much help.
- Like all other Kink sites it has very high production values. These people aren't just shoving out some scene that looks like the last 100 updates.
- Great download speeds. I'm averaging 8 MB/s, most sites I download from only reach 6 MB/s and 6 MB/s is my average.
- One new scene per week.
- Some very long scenes if you like that.
- Lots of outdoors and public scenes.
Cons:
- Believe it or not, I wanted to give it a 100, something I've never done. Thought it would go good with reaching 500 experience points. Something I never thought I was possible. But there's no zip downloads for the pictures and that's been a big no-no for me for years. Took 4 points off for it.
- Took another point off for the disgrace part. I've always struggled with the disgracing of men or women. But only took 1 point off since the site is named Public Disgrace. I knew what I was getting into.
Bottom Line:
I don't think any site works for me in the ways Public Disgrace does. I'll have a little fun with this part. A big part of my enjoyment of porn has to do with the fantasy aspect of it. This fantasy could be me being one of the random guys standing around watching the scene being filmed in an adult video store (do those even exist anymore?) to my self-abusive side imagining my wife (girlfriends in the past) being the woman in the scene. Neither one is particular healthy, but I do need this type of change from mainstream porn scenes.
I always turn to the Kink sites to break my boredom with mainstream porn. The good part with Public Disgrace is it only updates once a week so if you have the hard drive space, you can catch up with every past scene then just join sporadically to pick up the new updates.
What you're getting here is the closest thing I know of to public sex. I've tried the ones going for the more realistic belief (spy cams, voyeur cams, security cams), but I'm able to convince myself on most of Public Disgrace's scenes being authentic. I find it easier to convince myself than trying to watch those green shaded cam videos. So there's the funny part about me and my interest in this site. It lets my fantasies feel realistic.
I guess if a person wanted to nitpick they could say there's no 1080p videos and if there are, I've not found them. The newest updates highest option available is 720p. Bitrates are very high at 5,000+ so they stretch pretty cleanly to a 1080p screen/monitor.
And I will always nitpick about zip downloads for picture sets. I feel strongly about this on a site that is shot mostly in public. Videos work good, but photos let you see not only the action, but also the people in the background, their expressions, reactions, things you most likely miss in videos.
The disgrace part isn't as bad as a I remembered it being. I still see a lot of it as immature. Kind of makes you think you're watching Bang Bros, but instead of goofy/annoying college frat boy talk from the cameraman and crew, you get people writing on the woman's body. Could live without claiming to disgrace a woman by having her have sex in front of a crowd. That part to me is also an insult to the members of the site since I'm supposed to assume the model is disgraced.
As for public sex and nudity, they could do just that and I'd be happy. I feel like porn these days has become too vanilla and predictable. There's nothing predictable about a girl suddenly bending over in a bar and spreading her butt for anal sex in front of 200 people.
A strong suit of Kink's is that they know the models who are capable of doing this type of porn and it shows in the scenes. Just like in regular life, we all have different fetishes and dislikes. I think the majority of Kink's models love doing these types of unique scenes. I'm guessing most have an exhibitionist side that feels holed up by 127 scenes of them having bed or couch porn sex. You get some really great, genuine scenes here thanks to that.
There's also some added mystery and intrigue to the scenes. For example: A 22 year old college girl being tied up outside for sex with four men. Only comes an older man and she starts giving him a blowjob while the other four men take turns with her. Is it because she's getting paid to give the blowjob or is it that she got that horny over the four men taking turns with her? You don't get that with the vast majority of porn sites.
I've said it many times before. There's something to be said for being different and original. I'm not for sure if new porn fans would really be into these scenes. Sometimes there's 10-15 minutes of build-up before there's any sex. It kind of reminds me of going from reading a magazine to reading a Hemingway novel. It's definitely not for everyone just like Hemingway isn't for everyone.
I was surprised by the near my max download speeds and it was on all scenes I downloaded. It's needed as some of the scenes go over 2 GB.
Everything else was as expected. Lots of pretty (many tattoos) girls doing things that go beyond a girl doing just regular porn. That's a major turn-on for me and no site does it better. On the downside, there are times I won't even look at Public Disgrace for 3-4 days. Either way, it's a great site that sometimes will push things a little further than I think they should. I would recommend it to anyone who's looking for a site that is nearly guaranteed to be different than any porn you are watching right now. And just remember, let your fantasies require realism. They might be opposites, but if you can do that with this site you'll probably like it as much as I do.
Hey RA, I laughed a little when I read this reply since the main reason I hadn't joined Everything Butt was the more extreme samples I had seen! Everything Butt would be a natural join for me since it's my favorite part of the woman, but I saw one or two that went into prolapse and I shuffled it to the back of my list of sites to join. Agree on the Molly and Steve scene and Samia. One that I liked a lot but can't think of who is in it was in a tattoo parlor. I thought that one was pulled off really well. I went ahead and let my membership recur since I do think I'm going to download every scene from it. I may have went a little low on my score since it's rare for me to download and keep every scene from a site.
You would think as much as people like the public nude sites there would be more. I guess the rules and laws make it a lot harder though than just throwing together a paint by numbers porn scene.
Hey RB, thanks, the site might appeal to you since I know from past reviews and discussions you like the kinky side some. I sometimes go off into the more out there sites and I am still a member on it, going on my second month since I didn't get to download everything I wanted. And a big plus in my book, I haven't deleted any scene I downloaded and watched. Seems like a site that fits the quality of quantity heading.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's public sex that sometimes isn't really public, that other times is very kinky.
- As with every Kink site I've been a member on there are high quality photos and videos and plenty of imagination with each scene.
- Navigation issues aren't too bad here since I had never been a member of the site and just scrolled through the updates, making it quite easy to navigate.
- European sets seem to really push the public limit with sex on streets and in barely hidden places that the viewer can still see the society functioning around. Will go further in BL.
- Models can be hit or miss for me. The older European sets had more models I am familiar with, but the newer sets, mostly shot around or in the Kink armory have models I'm not as familiar with. One thing that keeps this in the pros are the appearances of Isis Love in several scenes, though not listed in the model credits.
- Download speed is always above average on Kink sites
Cons:
- Scenes in America may push the limit of misleading advertising. I'm not of this belief, but the comment section of the newer American scenes have 20% comments complaining that they are not public, will further in BL.
- I'm beating, maybe flogging would be a better word since it's Kink, the dead horse when I complain about the photo sets being broken up into parts, but I feel it's important for potential members to know.
- While the site is plenty large enough, considering the complexity of the scenes, I don't know if it offers much for multi-month memberships or for many return visits. Numbers in BL.
Bottom Line:
This site had been one on my list to join. The last 4 sites I have joined are Kink sites. My overall impression of this site is good, but at times, I was either thinking things went too far or things were way too protected.
With any exhibitionism or voyeur site, I do need at least some believability. I have enough of an imagination to make most scenes believable. Having said that, I know a lot of porn viewers don't. The members comments on Public Disgrace use words like "false advertising" and "bait and switch" and these are not just 1 or 2 comments, but maybe 5-10 on some scenes. This is my feeling on it.
In the earlier scenes on this site, starting in 2008, it was more of an exhibitionism site than disgrace site. These scenes included recording the male and female models having sex in subway steps as traffic and people walked by. It included sex by the road as traffic went by. From what I can tell by the license plates on the cars it was nearly all shot in Europe. There are complaints about "where is the disgrace?" They do have some scenes that go into bondage in public places, but the majority of the scenes that are outside in Europe are much more regular sex as described earlier in this paragraph. The scenes take on a decided turn to filming in and around the Kink armory in San Francisco. They bring in a crowd to watch, these rarely go into the exhibitionism like the European scenes did since it's a controlled crowd and controlled environment, but these do bring in more disgrace than the European scenes.
How disgraceful? I'm sure it's subjective. There is writing on the model's body, "I'm a slut", "Whore" to dumping food on the model to heavy bondage. These scenes remind me more of Sex and Submission type scenes. Where you as a member have to choose is if you prefer the more public, less disgrace scenes or less public, more disgrace scenes. Only a small amount of the scenes really do both. I do understand and respect the possible laws they had to be concerned about breaking so I'm not really against either side, but I do prefer the more public, less disgrace.
Overall the site is pretty big considering the niche and complexity of each scene, however, it only updates once a week.
As of 11/7/2012 there are a total of 209 scenes. These scenes include photos and video. The videos are quite long ranging from 45 minutes to 90 minutes. The photos are split into parts on the zips.
If you're big on technical quality, this site delivers. These are the video options.
Smaller Screen is 640x360 in MP4 format
Most compatible is 960x540 in WMV format
Windows Media HD is 1280x720 in WMV format
Highest Quality MP4 is 1280x720 in H264 MP4 format
All 209 scenes have those options.
Navigation is pretty limited, but with 209 scenes, you can just scroll through pages of 14 scenes per page. It doesn't do much good to use the model search since it takes you to all the model's scenes on their family of sites, most of which, you won't have a membership to.
As mentioned earlier you get one new scene per week. With the newer scenes turning more to the disgrace side, this could be a problem for me with future joins. I don't want to say all of the American scenes are bad though. Quite a few are in more public places than the Kink armory and as long as they work the crowd into it, whether a controlled crowd or environment or not, I will still like those scenes.
Where they lose me is in the disgrace part. I don't mind bondage, but we saw a bunch of immature sites years ago try the writing on the model's bodies angle and it failed miserably for them. I don't think it's that I'm offended as much as it is that I expect more from Kink than this. I would think anytime you're dealing with a niche like disgrace there are lines that go into "That's not disgrace, it's just silly". On the other side, I wouldn't want them to truly go into disgracing the models either since I'm not even for sure how far that would have to go. The last side of it is I don't ever hold a site to stick directly with their name since the amount of urls available isn't that large and I don't know if I would ever want to be on a site that never changes.
I enjoyed the site though. It's different enough from the mainstream to keep my attention on it. I would like to see more public exhibitionism, but more than that, just enough to give my imagination something to work with. The body writing makes my imagination want to get a washcloth and soap to wash it off. Not exactly the point of joining a porn website.
I would recommend it to most anyone. The disgrace is if anything silly and playful. The models are pretty and some have never been seen. I just don't think if you're really into disgrace you're going to get it here and outside of the Euro scenes, I don't think you're going to truly get a lot of public sex unless you're able to tap into your imagination some. The one admittedly biased part is Isis Love being in some of the newer scenes.
I enjoyed a membership at this site more than I thought I would. Similar to how I also enjoy Kink's Live Ultimate Surrender matches. I know it would knock the price up, but I think they should have a fully live site with each of their niches being covered on it. I would probably look for the lifetime membership option!
One thing you may not know being from Canada. Folsom Street Fair is a very liberal setting, nudity is allowed. From what I know from living in California, nudity is legal in the state, even in public. It's the lewd acts while being nude that are illegal. San Francisco though is probably one of the most tolerant cities in the United States, I would only rate Los Angeles and Miami above it. Not at all knocking Kink for shooting at a commonly nude fair, but thought you might find that interesting. It's a fair that leans very heavily on BDSM themes and though a few kids have been seen at the fair, it is 18 and over admittance.
I've tried several of Kink's site recently and this one runs neck and neck with Ultimate Surrender as my favorite.
Thanks Rusty, For some reason I can't view their previews or download them. I had even went to one TGP site I trust, Tiava's, searched public disgrace and got around 40 results, but when I clicked them to download the samples the pages were blank. Maybe they were just having some technical issues.
That indoor, dark, repetitive part was the part I was worried about since I've been a member on 3 of their sites and all 3 sites seemed to shoot in the same general area. Feel the same about the tied part. I noticed in one of the pictures, a woman covered with clothespins clipped onto her body and that's one of those things I don't think I could get into either. Maybe I can get some of the samples to start working and start re-considering whether to join or not.
I've been back and forth to this site probably a dozen times over the last few weeks considering joining it. The public part interests me a lot, but I notice in some of the samples, there's quite a bit of bondage/pain in the scenes. I'm pretty familiar with Kink's sites and have liked the ones I have joined, but I'm curious about the disgracing part and to what extent it goes. I know Kink had one site, don't remember the exact name to make a link that had to do with water torture and thought it was too harsh for me to enjoy. I guess it's one of those things where the models obviously consent to it and I can convince my brain of that, but I can't find sexual stimulation from seeing a woman being hurt physically whether with her consent or not. Also am wondering how believable the sets are. Which is the only constant problem I've had with Kink sites and that is repetitiveness. Thanks in advance for any info.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons:
- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of 5 sites with more niche and fetish content than the majority of networks offer.
- Very high technical quality on the network, they have 4K scenes dating back to 2015 and all content has at least 1080p option on the videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- Over 3,500 videos and photo sets, near even split of 1,767 videos and 1,747 photo sets. Photos are downloadable in zips.
- The five included sites are different enough from the other 4 sites to make it feel like a true network unlike many that have similar content on every site.
- 782 models, all of the models are at the worst, attractive and most are in the very attractive group.
- They use unique filming styles.
- Updates 5 times a week.
- Maybe the deepest search engine I've ever seen.
Cons:
- Niches can be both pros and cons, they can be the reason to join or the reason not to join, since each site sticks with a niche there could be some of the content you have no interest in.
- They film differently than most sites. Like the pro of the same reason, it will be explained in BL.
- They could make the navigation a little more obvious.
Bottom Line:
This is an interesting network because it offers very specific, right down to the title of the site, niches. The included sites are:
Wet and Puffy - Is a solo focused site that includes clitoris and labia pumping/suction, close to extreme masturbation. It reminds me a little of In the Crack.
Wet and Pissy - Very similar to Wet and Puffy except for the one big but it has pissing in every scene. They even have slow-motion pissing scenes.
We Like to Suck - This is an oral/blowjob site and some of the unique filming styles show here. They get the blowjob from multiple views. It is different than the usual POV or directly over her head style used in filming most blowjob sites.
Simply Anal - This one's title says all you need to know.
Eurobabe Facials - Another one that needs no explanation.
The content is good. The solo scenes remind me of the days when Euro porn was on top of the porn world. They do use a lot of closeups on the Wet and Puffy site, it's most likely why I compared it to In the Crack. They are going to make sure you see every inch of the model. The camera styles are hard to figure out. I don't know if they are just looking to break some new ground or if they just opted to have multiple views. I do like the blowjob site. It reminds me to some extent of Only Blowjobs on DDF. Blowjob scenes can become repetitive and even dull but the models here do a good job of being into the scenes.
I would think the pissing site is one of the biggest fetish draws. I don't see a lot of pissing content these days. It's one of those niches I am mostly indifferent to but have to say even I found myself watching the slow motion pissing scenes just because I don't know if I will ever see that in real life.
There's a good amount of content with roughly half of it being on Wet and Puffy, the facials site has the least amount of content.
I thought my biggest complaint was going to be the lack of navigation. I clicked on "filter" and it opened up a whole new world of navigation. I've never seen a search engine like this. It deserves some detail.
You have tabs for "model", "action", "location" and "date/site". Sounds good enough. If you click model you now can choose from 10 different categories like hair color, skin type and nationality. When you click on one of those, we will use "skin type" for the review it gives you a whole new list featuring bellybutton piercing, tattoos, face piercing, body freckles, it's the deepest search engine I can remember seeing on a porn site.
The location one is good for a few laughs. First is "furniture" and clicking it brings up options like "cushion", "desk" and "chair". You can also select "place of action" with choices like "bathroom" and "floor". It is proof that someone working at the Puffy Network might be more obsessive than I am!
How accurate those choices are is maybe questionable. It looks like they stopped using some of the tags. It still is worth a few tries just to see a 3 to 4 step search engine at work.
One thing I am not for sure about are the models. I don't recognize most of the models but they seem like pros. I don't keep up with models like I used to so I am really not for sure.
I haven't seen much content like this so I'm sure it is exclusive to this network.
I don't know that I could be much more positive than comparing one of their sites to DDF's Only Blowjob and another to In the Crack. It also has enough broad appeal (solo, pissing, anal, blowjob) that it could be recommended to most porn fans.
One thing I forgot and it's something I saw on another site recently. They have a channels tab with content from other sites. They list the other sites: 18 Closeup, Amateur Allure, Babes, Club Seventeen, DDF, Perfect Gonzo, Stiffia and Yanks. There are close to 100 scenes from those sites combined that you can download.
Something those bonus scenes reminded me of, the Wet and Puffy, Simply Anal and Wet and Pissy content reminds somewhat of the content produced by the DEV8 group. They are the ones that run Perfect Gonzo now and used to be known for Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic.
Overall, I like the Puffy Network and would recommend it to anyone that is a fan of the niches they cover.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No network has improved more and hits on more niches and fetishes than Pure CFNM.
- 6 site included with subscription.
- CCBill is the biller, haven't seen them in awhile.
- 1,409 scenes as of 3/17/2020.
- Averages 5-6 updates per week across the network.
- Has a feature all networks should have. Will explain in BL.
- Categories are accurate.
- A current total of 680 models.
Cons:
- Some of the degradation goes too far. I hold the same feeling with males towards females and females towards males. Some scenes include the women spitting in the man's face.
- Some of the more specialized sites like Lady Voyeurs could use a little more action or interaction from the ladies.
Bottom Line:
Just about hit the 100 button. Then she spit in his face. I've been a fan of CFNM for close to 10 years. The Pure CFNM network died off for a little while several years ago then came back with a vengeance.
These are the sites with a brief explanation: Pure CFNM the flagship site, this is a mixture of niches within the CFNM niche and has what I would call their most accessible scenes.
Lady Voyeurs is women watching men masturbate. This is the one with a lot more potential than I think they realize. The women have to become more involved, some do.
Amateur CFNM is what it says, these tend to have more sex in them and they're all worth a look and download.
CFNM Games was a short-lived site with only 24 scenes. These are okay.
Girls Use Guys is a major hit or miss site. Some of the scenes are some of the best on the network, others are trying too hard to be degrading to the man.
Hey Little Dick is degradation, some of it's a little funny at times. I don't see it as bad as the spitting ones.
The basis of CFNM is Clothed Female Nude Male. It doesn't always work out that way. I would say more times than not it ends up being as much female nudity as male. I've explained my interest in it. I'm a big guy, every woman I've ever been with becomes submissive and I like seeing women being aggressive since it's not something I experience much in life. And when I do, I usually end up laughing.
The quality here is very good. The options for downloading are basic with 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download pictures. There aren't any 4K scenes that I've seen.
The feature I mentioned in the pros is when you're in the hub page each scene has a little icon that tells you which site it's from. It seems like that should be standard for networks these days but this is one of the only ones I've seen it on.
I do think Lady Voyeurs has the most untapped potential. It shows in their scenes when the woman gets more involved instead of just sitting and watching the guy masturbate. You get a lot of fetishes here. The women are usually at least a little clothed by the end of the scene so you get the cum on clothes fetish, you get the handjob that turns into a blowjob that turns into sex. I think you could say there's exhibitionism and voyeurism as well.
The female models are not as well known to me as others. The majority are at least average or above average in looks.
I really don't think they have much room to improve. The degradation scenes seem to be toned down now.
There's also no ads or upsell offers. It's very close to being the best site for me. My fiancee enjoys it so that's a major plus. Would recommend it to anyone that's looking for something that goes against the grain.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that I thought had died off but is running strong now.
- CCBill as biller, this didn't used to be the case.
- Roughly 1,200 CFNM themed scenes with photos and screencaps as well.
- Over 500 models.
- Download speeds reach 80% of my max.
- CFNM is a genre that touches on multiple niches and it's one of my favorite non-mainstream porn genres.
- Network includes 6 sites with themes they follow: Lady Voyeurs, Little Dick, Girls Abuse Guys, Amateur CFNM, CFNM Games and the flagship site Pure CFNM.
- There's a story to the scenes though don't expect in Oscar-winning acting performances.
- Pictures and screencaps are downloadable and add the same element those add in exhibitionism porn, see BL.
- One of the best navigating networks I've used.
- No set update schedule but they added 17 scenes in March and so far have added 8 in April.
- While the models aren't sold as amateurs except on the one site, I don't hardly know any of these models.
Cons:
- I think CFNM can be a polarizing genre. This network probably makes the clear too with some scenes that include the women using strap-ons on the men.
- The biggest problem is it's biggest strength. It's unique when compared to today's mainstream porn but it also can be repetitive.
Bottom Line:
CFNM has been one of my favorite genres since the first time I saw a CFNM scene. The one thing that can make the scenes better or worse is the acting ability of those in the scene. Most of these scenes are supposed to have a surprised, shocked beginning for the women but probably 50% of the time the actresses overact and oversell their shock and surprise.
The good thing is there's probably more CFNM content on this network than all other CFNM sites combined. All of the big networks have tried CFNM but none are still shooting it and most have under 100 scenes while this network has around 1,200 scenes.
The basis of the scenes is a woman, usually group of women, walk in on a guy masturbating, catch him looking at them while masturbating and their "punishment" for him is to make him finish masturbating while they watch. Lady Voyeurs is probably the closest to how the genre started and I noticed the scenes on it are only 480p, so those really might be the original scenes.
The basis has of course gotten lost which I prefer the new style better. Now, the women catch the guy and help him with 4-5 women giving him a handjob, there's usually that one woman who gets too aroused and turns it into a blowjob and some of the time it will turn into full sex. I was watching a scene and thought "This is what mainstream porn doesn't have in it anymore." And I think that's exactly the attraction to this style of porn. You're going to get tease in it, voyeurism, upskirts, panties, fully clothed with stripping and if I'm guessing if the women can't finish their job with their hand it becomes blowjob and sex.
The pictures and screencaps add a lot. Similar to exhibitionism porn, the stills allow you to see upskirts you wouldn't have seen in the video, the expressions on the women's faces and throw in hard nipples you wouldn't have noticed.
The navigation is very good. Everything is integrated. You can bounce from one site to another with one click, no sign in again. There also is the option of going to a hub-style page that lists all the updates across the network. Somehow they added a model list too and I only mention that because there are multiple models in nearly all scenes. They have done a good job of putting this network together.
I will mention again, there is some content that some might not like but some is also not as bad as the names suggest. Girls Abuse Guys is just soft domination, pretty much what CFNM started out as. There are scenes with the woman or women using strap-ons on the guy. The Little Dick site is a lot like Bang Bros CFNM Show, women laugh and pick on the guy for his lack of size while he tries to get off. You're not going to see anything that's comparable to the rougher dominant male sites.
There is the possibility of the content becoming repetitive, I think this wouldn't be as likely if the acting was better. This still is a relatively rare genre as most of the big networks have all tried CFNM but most feedback from their webmasters was it costs too much, is not that popular but I do believe it's becoming more popular. I did add the numbers in my head and believe if you joined every CFNM site on the major networks you would have around 400 scenes or you can join here and have 1,200+.
I mentioned the network using CCBill, it makes me wonder with the greatly-improved navigation if they've switched owners or management. Also, the 17 updates a month is unheard of on a CFNM site.
It's now one of my current favorites and for the time being it's being added to my FTV/Zishy recurring memberships. Very impressed. Apologies to Mbaya on reviewing the site just a few months after he did but I also agree with his review.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Loosely described "matures" site.
- 396 scenes
- Updates twice per month.
- Segpay is the biller.
- High quality site, videos, photos and features.
- Very good (85% of max) download speeds.
- Just over 200 models, some have as many as 14 scenes.
- Everything is downloadable and I haven't hit any limits.
Cons:
- Either I'm getting older or these mature models are getting younger. A lot of the models don't look much over 25. Not really a con unless you're really into much older women which I'm not.
- Not a con for me, but none of the videos have 4K.
- Borders on cookie cutter. Being a premium site I expect a little more in the production values.
Bottom Line:
This is a tough site to review. They have a nice selection of models (Ava Addams, Anissa Kate, and it wouldn't be a mature site without 14 scenes of Brandi Love). They play into several of the more popular niches (stepfamily, older/younger), but they hurt themselves in my opinion.
The site is marketed as a premium site separate from but ran by Porn Pros. Most of these sites have 4K videos. I could have missed a few but I haven't seen any 4K videos on this site.
That's not a big deal to me but what makes it premium? The two age groups that cause the most frustration for me as a porn viewer are the teen and mature groups. The teen ones you will see this near perfect model and she either overacts or under performs (shyness, not used to being submissive), while the matures have models that are bored or look like they have been here a thousand times before.
I get that feeling with a lot of these models even though I don't even know some of them. I would rate most of them as A or B in presentation and D or F in effort.
Of course that's not talking about all of them. Brandi Love puts on her usual top-level performances, India Summer has a scene that is really good and the site is relatively large, with nearly 400 scenes, as a standalone site.
The technical side of things is good, nothing more or less. The oldest videos have a 1080p, 720p and 480p download option, some of the older scenes do not have photos but do have screencaps. The newest videos have the same download options except with higher bitrates.
That's a word I don't like using with a premium site ... inconsistency. Some have pictures, some don't. Some have low bitrates, others have too high of bitrates. Some of the models give very good performances, some are very poor. There's very little middle ground here.
There are better mature sites, maybe it's just me but these older models should at least be able to give a decent acting performance. See Brandi Love for example. I find her attractive but she isn't near the look I prefer. Her performances make her scenes worth looking over that part.
It's an easy site to navigate. If you like the models it would be worth joining. Otherwise, it is hard to really recommend this site as there are better sites out there in the same niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An up and coming site from Dev8
- Excellent quality with newest videos showing 1900+ on resolution and near 8000 bitrates
- Pictures are near 2000 high end and come zipped
- Models are some of the best in the business. The Sabrina Sweet set sold me on joining, something about a girl in a LAPD shirt!
- Downloads coming faster on this site then the other Dev8 site I reviewed, actually hitting near 1300 kb/s on 10 M connection.
Cons:
- Still a small site for the price. I downloaded all of the videos in less than 5 days and that wasn't constant downloading, just a few hours here and there.
- Older content isn't near as good quality as the newest content
- Only weekly updates
Bottom Line:
Finishing up my recent 3 sites of Dev8 joins, this one may have the most potential. I believe in a year, if they keep up with weekly updates they will be over 100 videos and for a new member, 100 of these videos would be a great deal.
There are several things I like about Dev8 sites, the high quality being #1 and another thing to mention is the very easy navigation. These guys make great porn sites.
My only real complaints here is that there isn't enough content for the price. I had the whole site downloaded in less than a week and only came back to get the updates. Take that as a compliment, I just want more content like this!
Also of note, many of these sets start with the female in a uniform of some sorts. I mention that since I know we have some uniformed porn lovers here.
The quality is high with the 1900+ high end resolution videos, that have near 8000 bitrates and even the older ones are not that bad either. Though maybe I would mention this to them, why not remaster some of the older ones, maybe once per week to fill the week's updates in more?
The pictures come in zips with high 2000 high end resolutions, and are worth downloading if just for the fully dressed parts that start each set.
My download speeds improved almost double from the other Dev8 site I was on. The models as with all of their sites are gorgeous. Last, another thought would be maybe to join two of the smaller sites or make a network, all of their content is great, recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site that makes me join Adult Time
- They are up to 328 scenes and update once per week
- The Adult Time access, with all the good and bad that comes with that
- About as dark and risky as mainstream porn can go
- Solid acting and pretty models
- Production is top-tier as is the technical quality
- Never have listed this as a pro, nearly always good choices in casting
- Good download speeds at 85% of my max download speed
Cons:
- Still not for sure the site is better than its predecessor Pretty Dirty but that’s as much a compliment as negative.
- The Adult Time navigation
Bottom Line:
I first reviewed Pure Taboo on 12-3-2018. It was the site that Adult Time caught my attention with. The site has grown a lot since then. At that time, Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo only had 318 between the two sites. Pure Taboo now has 328 scenes just by itself and you can still access the Pretty Dirty scenes too. Sticking the word “Taboo” in your site’s name is a risky idea. Some of this content isn’t close to taboo. Some of it is very close, or as close as you’re going to get to taboo. They are relying on you to use your imagination on most of the scenes to see the “taboo”. Which is why it’s risky.
The other reason it’s risky is there really isn’t that much taboo you can legally do in porn. That’s creating a heavy reliance on the viewer’s ability to suspend their reality. It works for me. This is how I always watched porn. The scenes, in what shouldn’t be taken as an insult, remind me of the glory days of Vivid. There is chemistry between the actors and actresses. There is a feeling they really are pulling off believable acting in porn. I do believe the mood, lighting, build-up, story, plays a major role in that. There’s 10 or more minutes of story and build-up before the clothes come off. For those that didn’t experience the Vivid glory years, they had entire scenes with no sex, it was leading into the next scene. That’s back when we watched porn on DVDs.
The technical part of the scenes is as impressive as you will find. There are download options for the videos from 160p to 4K, an unbelievable 8 different resolutions. The photo sets could be better. They are generally small in quantity of pictures with 35-50 pictures and they’re not studio photo sets. They are downloadable but even as a photo collector, I don’t download these. I am sure the thinking there is these scenes are made to be watched as videos to get the story and that would make the pictures less important.
I am going to review Adult Time as a whole since I reviewed it in its very early stages a few years ago. For this Pure Taboo review I will just say the Adult Time navigation has all the makings of great navigation and potential I talked about in 2018 but it’s still not very good. It carries over to the sites including this one.
The Pure Taboo scenes create a feeling of uneasiness in the viewer and that, to me, is the taboo with these scenes. I am not that into the most hardcore porn but Pure Taboo can get me to watch it. That is a big reason for the high score. Someone is doing something right. The scenes are long, at times, I even feel like the scenes are too long. It maybe enters the area of unrelenting or punishing even. There’s more of the taboo they are creating. I believe their taboo isn’t in the “story”. A secretary is seduced by her boss while his wife is behind the whole idea. That’s not taboo. That probably happened somewhere in America yesterday. The taboo for me is there is something going on with these scenes that are touching nerves in the viewer. The viewer then needs to make the connection to whatever nerve that is. It then becomes taboo. Two middle-aged buddies are watching a football game and one’s daughter’s friend comes over to study. They end up having a threesome with her like in their own younger years. That’s not taboo. Porn has been doing that scene for decades. But something in the dialogue, something in the lighting, it’s creating the taboo. It is, if you allow it, getting in your mind and nerves. Subliminal porn? I’m not going to say it is. I am going to say it’s way above porn-level directing and producing, it’s far beyond porn-level writing and most importantly, the actors and actresses are showing real acting ability.
My comparison to Vivid’s glory years is the greatest compliment I could give a site. Even today, 20 years after Vivid’s glory years, my favorite porn scenes are from those glory years of Vivid.
Pure Taboo is easily my favorite what I think is American-based site. To me, it breaks the hold the reality porn networks had on the market. That probably isn’t true since not everyone has tried Pure Taboo out and not everyone will like the depth of their scenes. It does break the hold the reality porn networks had on me. With the high technical quality, weekly updates, I really wish they would offer it as a separate site from Adult Time. Maybe put it and Pretty Dirty together like it was in 2018. That was my first exposure to it. I joined Pretty Dirty in 2018, Pure Taboo was just launching as was Adult Time. It does a little of everything too, there’s near heartcore, very hardcore, lesbian and everything in-between. Very close to being a perfect site. The pictures or lack thereof is stopping it from being perfect. Maybe the female models can’t get into character well enough for the pictures while getting into the character for the video? Either way, near perfection is saying a lot in today’s porn industry.
It's not as bad as you think lol. I read your Fantasy Massage review that talks about Adult Time but what if someone just reads my review and doesn't see your comment about Adult Time? And I joined both of those, Taboo Sex and Fantasy Massage back in October which was well before they started including Adult Time.
The main difference I see in Dirty Time and Taboo Sex is Taboo Sex feels more polished and better executed, kind of like Dirty Time was their starting point and it evolved into Taboo Sex. I will admit that I hadn't seen your review of Taboo Sex. I originally was getting it confused with the Fetish Network. The newer content on it is similar to Taboo Sex's content. And when I joined it, it was one of those flash sales for 2 months for $15, so I didn't look any reviews up. I do still think there's a fine line with the acting part and that goes more into the script. I watched 3 scenes in a row that followed a very similar script but overall, I do like the content. If you haven't checked it out, check out Family Strokes. I thought it was really good, it's ran by the same people who run Team Skeet and has a lot of story, talking, acting in it. I thought their 4th of July scene of a "dad" having sex with his daughter's best friend, while the daughter grilled food about 10 ft away from them, was one of the best I've seen in this style of porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the newer sites that to me fall into a "Premium" category.
- I joined 2 months ago on a $14 for 2 months promo. It comes with the site Pretty Dirty and this review will cover both sites. Of note: As has been mentioned about Adult Time, this site now offers me Adult Time access.
- 318 scenes between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty, all have up to 1080p and 4 lesser resolution download options.
- It's the type of hardcore I prefer since it requires me to imagine a little before the sex starts.
- Overall, good acting in the scenes I've watched, I don't know if I just like Abella Danger so much that I think she's a great actress or if she really is. Several others do a good job too.
- DL speeds are very good (80% and up of max)
- Photo sets available but they are screenshots and can be downloaded.
- Mostly well-known pornstars but at least here you do see more from them than their best scream in piledriver.
Cons:
- This doesn't make much sense to me but the sites feel cluttered. Maybe it's the colors they use?
- For every good actress in porn, there's a dozen male "actors" that are only good at acting at acting.
- Not for sure why they have Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty as different sites. Both sites have similar storylines.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of funny that I was just talking last week about not having any access to Adult Time, I then got access to it with the Fantasy Massage network and now I have access to it with the Pure Taboo/Pretty Dirty network. I'm not including that access in this review since I have no idea how long they will continue giving access to it.
I joined Pure Taboo back when they had the 2 months for $14 deal and didn't even know I had access to Pretty Dirty until the second week of my membership. Taboo is such a broad word when it comes to porn. I actually remember one of the first porn videos I ever saw being either Taboo 1 or Taboo 2 that was supposed to be a real brother and sister having sex. I was a teenager and just have vague memories of it. The taboos on this site are fairly common these days, going into the stepfamily niche and some that don't even use the word "step" in front of daughter or sister.
My interest in taboo is pretty simple. As long as I am convinced it's something that's not supposed to be happening, it's good enough for me. It's like when I admit to having a rebellious side and people in 2018 ask how I was rebellious, I shaved my head bald in high school. They roll their eyes. Then, I became a psychologist who refused to suggest prescriptions ... that always makes the jaws drop. Anyway, you're going to need your imagination with these scenes.
There's a decent amount of content between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty with 318 scenes as of December 3, 2018. Pretty Dirty no longer updates unless I'm doing something wrong. The newest update on it says 1 year ago. Pure Taboo updates twice a week.
I do think this content is rather unique because they almost go overboard with the stories. How many sites have this on a scene ... "WARNING: What you are about to watch is arguably the most shocking and graphic family roleplay scene we have ever filmed. We hope you find it equally arousing and disturbing!"
A recent Pure Taboo scene has Kendra Spade playing the stepdaughter role. She comes home to find her stepfather mad and fussing at her. She's fidgeting, he's blocking her from getting by while he continues to fuss and she pisses on herself in her tight jeans. I'm mostly indifferent to pissing scenes but this one is very sexy. They then work in the corny dialogue as the stepdad tells her to take her jeans off, you know, "so you don't track the pee through the house". She takes them off, he tells her that her panties are really soaked too. She starts to take them off and says, "Isn't this inappropriate?" He chuckles a little, "Yeah, if I was you real dad it would be." I can appreciate the laughs in porn but there's a fine line.
I should add that some of Pretty Dirty's scenes go more into "forced" scenes but you don't ever get the feeling it's non-consensual. Much like I said in the previous paragraph, I think this kind of porn also has a fine-line.
I believe the names of their scenes do as much to build a perception of the scenes as the actual scenes do. One of the newer ones is "The bad uncle returns" which I do think has more implication with it than the scene shows. The stories are mostly well thought out, acting overall is okay, so many of the female models seem to have spent the majority of their "acting" lives as sweet, innocent and go overboard with it. Kind of like the old pigtails and lollipops scenes.
And that leads to one problem with this type of porn. I would imagine that those who prefer the straight to action style will do a lot of fast-forwarding. Most of the scenes on Pure Taboo range from 30-55 minutes and a few didn't have much action until 15+ minutes had passed. That fine line shows up again. While it's easy to complain about scenes that jump right into sex, it's also easy to complain that "that's too much acting". I don't think I've ever opened a porn video and thought, "I'm going to kick back and watch 20 minutes of actors trying to convince me they're related!"
Overall though, Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty are a very good combination that's worth checking out at least once. If you can get the two months for one price, I think it becomes the cheapest of these premium, story-based, porn sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A bit of a strange site with straightforward sex.
- Close to 170 models and most look like amateurs to me. There are some pros, including an old favorite, Misty Stone.
- CCBill is the biller
- Huge difference in looks from model to model, could even be a con for some.
- 310 scenes as of 9/3/2019, roughly 290 photo sets that can be downloaded.
- All of the scenes I've watched start with the model dressed.
- Updates twice per week.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- I like the personality of the site/content.
Cons:
- This site is just different. There are implants, tattoos, what look to be ass implants, then there are some really pretty girl next door types.
- Too many BTS interviews for a site with only 310 videos (they are included in that count).
- I might catch a little flak for saying this but some of these women look like their prime passed before Amazon had Prime.
- Possibly recycling
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a couple of their handjob/pussyjob/cameltoe slide videos on a promo tube site.
I like those scenes. The site really has a good personality. The scenes don't feel like cookie cutter porn. It's not an all amateur site. There are quite a few porn stars on it. Some of them have changed so much you might not recognize them. One that comes to mind, Kiara Mia. If she has anymore plastic surgery she's going to have to start having skin implants.
That's not meant as harsh as it sounds. She was a gorgeous model when she was younger and it's like she had one bad plastic surgery and couldn't stop.
They have a good blend of niches covered here. As mentioned in the beginning, those handjobs turning into cameltoe slides were the big draw for me. Eva Notty and Daisy Ducati are two of the other ones I knew and they have handjob scenes.
The biggest complaint for me isn't listed in the cons. This feels like an incomplete site. It feels like it should be in a network. If it had another site or double the amount of content it would be easier to recommend it.
I mentioned possibly recycling, at least comment on PU mentions it and when I look at the content I see this:
The oldest scenes are from March 2013. They update twice per week. That would be 104 updates per year. They have been updating for 6.5 years. That would be around 700 scenes. They have 310.
I'm not punishing them for it but am letting it be known.
It doesn't hurt in the quality department. The oldest scenes have 1080p, the newer scenes add 720p, 480p and 360p. The photo sets are very large in amount of pictures, some with as many 500 and most are videocaps.
One of their strengths is the variation in content. They have transsexual, straight, women using dildos on men, cosplay, and that's just not a blend you see on a lot of sites.
About the women, I think this could be the big attraction or big turn-off for some. There are some listed as GILFs (grannies), lots of implants, lots of tattoos and a lot of the women act like they've been in porn since John Holmes days.
I am happy enough with the membership. I downloaded all of the handjob, potential cameltoe slide videos (73 of those). The cosplay ones always interest me, but their costume designer must have came from the 70s too and there are 3 cosplay scenes on the whole site. It might be worth checking out just to see vintage Captain America. The costume looks like a pair of Captain America pajamas I had when I was a kid.
Don't take that as negative either. As mentioned, I like the personality of the site, it doesn't take itself very seriously and has a playful side to it. I think an 80 is a good score for it. The handjob content made it for me. I didn't download anything else.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Look what slipped in. One of the only sites I ever felt like saying the word “unique” really applied to.
- It’s not like any site I have been on. There’s a Heaven side and there’s a Hell side.
- Created by the same people that created the great Alt Erotic.
- Seeing how many of the models can pull off Heaven and Hell.
- They have a special right now for Easter. I’m not going to say that’s ironic.
- Download speeds are good, about 80% of my max.
- This is a really important one. This site could be a lot more confusing than it is. They have it set up in a way that it works properly. You still may get confused.
Cons:
- They tried something different. All the angry porn fans screaming stop trying to evolve porn!
- It could be confusing to people.
Bottom Line:
What have I found here? I’m going to try and simplify it. The site itself is purgatory. No sermons coming from me. When you search in the episodes or trilogies, you can select Heaven or Hell. The Heaven scenes are more innocent. Newest one is a cute hair beautician seducing the man getting his haircut. Which is creative. Alt Erotic was doing something like this with their site and tattoo artists seducing the people being tattooed. The Heaven side also goes into what I would call standard porn or normal porn. Clary Trinity, one of my current favorites, has a scene on the Heaven side. It’s her and I think Jay Romero having sex in the house. If you start with that scene it doesn’t seem like much is going on but it’s part 2 of a trilogy. Part 1 was Jay having sex with Chloe Temple, his “supposed” lover. He told her about his fantasies. Clary Trinity is his fantasy. In episode 1, this story was all set up and sex happened. In episode 2, Jay lives out his fantasy with Clara. Episode 3 hasn’t been released yet and there’s the hook and what this site is doing right. All I can see is a blurred image for episode 3. I can’t tell if that’s Clary or Chloe or some other woman. That’s just the Heaven side.
Let’s try the Hell side now. Donnie Rock tired and drunk. His girlfriend is Jazlyn Ray, quite attractive. Donnie is drunk and his buddy Mazee the Goat is with them. Mazee makes the moves on Jazlyn since Donnie is passed out drunk. But there’s the Hell. Donnie likes watching. He starts watching in this trilogy called, “One Eye Open”. Jazlyn then has another run with Mazee and invites her friend Kay Lovely for a threesome. Somehow, Donnie got on the couch and fell asleep and Jazlyn notices he’s peeping. I think part 3 of it is a foursome.
They’re doing something different. I will give them that. I really like what they’re doing and would put on par or even above Pure Taboo. They are showing real fantasies people have and are letting those fantasies play out instead of relying on the text box to explain what’s going on. It’s takes decent acting ability to do these scenes. They don’t take themselves that seriously. Anytime you put Charles Dera in a scene, you’re not looking for serious. The site if nothing else shows me that porn can change. It can be creative. Some of these models, male and female, can act and they don’t have to be overtly silly or too serious.
The part no one should be surprised by is most of the female models are either Heaven or Hell. Only a few do both. Kenzie Reeves has 5 Hell scenes and 3 Heaven scenes. They have top talent too. The camerawork is as good as I’ve seen, and the settings fit the stories. I don’t think you’ll see most settings more than once. Not all of the scenes are part of a trilogy.
The technical facts about the site shows that it’s not even a budding site. It has some traction. It’s worth joining, the current special is $14.99 with downloads. There are 129 scenes currently when you combine the Heaven and Hell scenes. They do not have 4K, but all scenes do have 1080p and 720p. They also have nice photosets. Everything can be downloaded and its unlimited downloads.
I think the easiest way to approach this site is to not pay too much attention to the Heaven and Hell part. I just go through the new episodes and trilogies. They have been averaging 2 updates per month. The production values really set this site apart. It’s not a 100 site but it’s over 90. They have the stories, the continuity from one scene to another, the Heaven and Hell twist and top models. I like it a lot and look forward seeing where they take it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The solo site of Rachel Aziani, includes access to the Aziani network for a reasonable price.
- Rachel really comes off as genuine, a sweet, very attractive "older" woman with a great body.
- Videos are excellent quality but this quality also will show up in the cons, 1280 high end with up to 8000 bitrates.
- Pictures are decent quality, I do like their style of photography, very glam, very pretty sets, but there is a con here as well.
- Download speeds can reach about 95% of my max, and like the above, there is a con here too.
- Bonus sites are really good, I actually prefer Aziani.com to this site and you get free access to it with a subscription. It is a multi-model site that addresses at least one of the cons of this site and has some models like Georgia Jones that are not of the big breasted variety.
- Rocker/Sybian/Machine videos, these are the best videos off of the network, in my opinion. Absolutely loved the Eva Angelina Rocker video.
Cons:
- First con might not be a con to some and that is that the quality of the videos is so high that the files are HUGE for what you get. Will expand on this in BL.
- Second, Rachel's solo site does not offer zip files and some sets on Aziani.com also do not offer zips, this to me is unacceptable for a site that does most everything else RIGHT.
- Third, connection problems, I went through about 2 hours of "cannot load" pages earlier this morning. Download speeds will shoot skyhigh one minute then drop to 1/6th the speed in the matter of minutes.
Bottom Line:
The cons and further explanation.
The video size of some of the newer videos on this network are too big. A few examples, a newer Rachel solo video, believe it was Rachel206, it is 1280 high end with a 7600 bitrate, it is 11 minutes and nearly 400 megs! I don't think that is quite as bad though as a Julie Michel video on Aziani.com, it is 1280 high end with an 8000 bitrate and is over 450 MBs, BUT is only 8 minutes long! A half a gig for an 8 minute video is just too much.
I appreciate the high quality and the fast bitrates, but I'm sure those file sizes could be cut in half and ran at 4000 bitrate and be just as smooth to the naked eye.
As much as I like Rachel, not having zips for her photo sets really stops me from even looking at the photo sets. Maybe scale back those videos and use the money saved to zip the photo sets?
The other con is the biggest one to me. I had countless connection problems and as a comment I posted about 6 weeks ago told, I also and STILL do get security warnings on this site. It fixes for a few days then the security warnings are back that a page is trying to install something on my computer. The page is a pop-under ad that the site uses. That is uncalled for, I think it is bad enough to rip your visitors off, but trying to install junk on a paying members computer is just not good business.
Get past those cons and you have an excellent network of sites. Rachel has developed into one of the more entertaining and enjoyable performers on the internet. She has a big pretty, warm smile and big boobs, though I'm not a big boob fan, she has nice boobs to be that big.
The star of the network is the Rocker videos, this is a sex machine that the women sit on and you can't help but chuckle a little at some of them. Georgia Jones' expressions while using it was worth joining to see! Eva Angelina did everything she could to wear the Rocker out, but the Rocker won and left Eva giggling.
Those are original to me, they also have Sybian, but these Rocker videos are the first I've seen.
Model selection is great. Not only the lovely Rachel, but you have those mentioned above, plus a personal favorite in Carmel Moore, Renee Perez and dozens of other top level, mostly American models.
As a fan of mostly Euro glam, I can still say that this network is my favorite "mostly" American network. The girls all seem relaxed and have fun. Rachel's hardcore sets are with her husband Buzz, who is also a big part of the site and you are getting real sex between them, not the cookie cutter sex on most DVD sites.
With all this praise though, those cons, especially the no zips and connection/pop-under ads problems are really dragging this network down. Give us zips and fix whatever the problem is with the connection and this solo site is a 90 by itself! The network itself, is a 92-94, but I'm knocking off 10 points for the no zips and connection problems. Still recommended, mainly for Aziani.com and the Rachel videos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
