Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good site that includes access to a network of Latin models.
- Total of 9 sites included in membership, 8 are exclusive, Pacino's Adventures is a blend of solo, girl/girl and boy/girl hardcore and is exclusive. The 7 other exclusive sites feature 6 models and their friends. The other one Pacino's World is not exclusive from what I can see.
- Gigi Spice is an absolute doll. Lots of content of her here. Sadly have to buy separate membership to her solo site to get all of her content.
- Tech quality on newest updates goes like this, videos 1440x1080 w/6500+ bitrate. Pics are 1600 long end and come zipped. The older videos are 720 high end and are good enough for me, pics never go below 1200 on oldest sets.
- Two updates on this site per week, pic/video/screenshot in each update.
- Good DL speed, around 90% of my max DL speed
- For the most part nicely laid out navigation
- Around 65 models as of 3-27-10, multiple sets for most. Also plenty of fresh, never before seen models.
Cons:
- Would be in for a long time if Gigi's solo site was included in the network.
- Had a few downloads break during download, but the files are still there. Seemed to be more a connection issue, could have been my side. Re-downloads went fine.
- One of the sites, Pacino's World, looks to be a non-exclusive site of just various models. Wouldn't have noticed until I saw 3 sets of Eve Angel that are on almost all non-exclusive sites.
Bottom Line:
Not for sure why I hadn't joined this site earlier. My best guess is that it wasn't a network at one point and some of the solo model sites included are non-nude or topless only. Not that that is a bad thing, it probably was just pushed aside while I was looking for nude sites.
There are roughly 65 models on Pacino's Adventures and I've downloaded 60 of them. Gigi Spice is the star for me, Emy Reyes is also on here, she's one of the few models I had seen on other sites. Most of these models are new to me and nearly all are very pretty, nice bodies and not a lot of shyness either. The language could be a problem for some since it isn't English, but there are English subtitles for the important moments.
Pacino himself is the only male on the site. That could be a problem for some, but I think he does a good job of keeping himself off the camera as much as possible. He has a low voice so it's not the male screeching that many pornos have.
Tech quality is very good, those 1440x1080 videos look nice. Everything is arranged well. Model index, each model has her own page with all of her photo sets and videos on it.
The only real down for me is the exclusion of Gigi Spice's solo site. The way it works, Pacino's Adventures, Gigi Spice, Tania Spice and Karla Spice are like the flagship sites. When you join any of these you get La Zona Modelos, Pacino's World, Cierra Spice, Pamela Spice, Spice Twins, Selena Spice, Mariah Spice and Bella Spice. All of these sites are very good, but you're still going to need to buy multiple memberships if you want say Pacino's Adventures and Gigi Spice's solo site. Those four flagship ones never are included with one of the other flagship ones that I can see.
Not too bad of a deal since you still can get a dozen or more sets of each of those models on Pacino's Adventures and La Zona Modelos to see if you would want to pay another $30 for their solo sites.
Some of the more tame/less nude sets are still highly erotic. The bodies on these models are mostly curvy below the waist and smaller on the top half. Gigi looks to have about a 24 inch waist and 38 inch hips with 34B breasts. I didn't see any implants on any of the models, there are some tattoos, but most likely those are cultural ones not the kind just to look like everyone else. I was a bit surprised to see a white model in one of the recent updates, but I'm estimating 98% are Latina. Updates on the bonus sites are hard to tell much about. Most of those network sites are not dated on the updates so I wouldn't know if those are updating.
La Zona Modelos updates look to be 4 per week.
Pacino's Adventures updates every 3-4 days with the full photo/video/screencap update on each of those.
The solo ones are a little hard to tell, but there is a ton of content overall.
I'll go as far as saying it's the best Latina network/site out today. The exclusivity of the sets and fresh, new models also helps a lot. Highly recommended.
I don't think anything was removed since our numbers are the same. Maybe I had one more video, my folder for the site shows 109 videos. The thing is, I had been a member of Pacino's Adventures, his flagship site several times and had never even paid any attention to Pamela's content. For one, Pacino did get a little too cutesy with her in some content with the dress-up/costume, make her look as young as possible outfits. Where I did find a good scene though was with the model Karen. She has several videos with Karen including one that is outdoors, looks like maybe at a hotel, not really for sure, but there is a bridge not too far behind them and they are using a strap-on with each other with as many as 5-6 people, mostly men, standing in one spot staring at them from the bridge.
There also could be a difference if you see the scenes without subtitles, but don't know the language. My wife is Spanish, so I've learned enough Spanish and Portuguese to at least have an idea of what is being said. Some of the scenes with exhibitionism in them may not look like it at first. I seem to discover ones I hadn't noticed each time I watch her videos. The most recent one, a public outdoor shower used to wash salt, chlorine off after swimming and she decides all of her needs the water!
It could also say something for her content since it was readily available for me, but I hadn't downloaded any of it until my 3rd membership at Pacino's Adventures. Pamela's site is a bonus site to it. A few others of note, there is one in the backseat of a car. While not directly out in the public, it is a small car, looks like maybe a Dodge Neon or Toyota Corolla and several times they pull up beside the tour buses which are very high. I think a big part of me liking her content is the playfulness she has. Her legs are mostly closed while they're sitting beside the bus and she says something about "if you see me close my legs it's because people are looking at me". You can see in the background, a very tall bus filled with people, but the playfulness there. Right as she says it, she opens her legs even more and touches herself. The taxi scene adds to the exhibitionism, not for sure how believable it is, but with a little imagination it is really good. Those are a few that wouldn't stand out as exhibitionism unless you watch through them.
I'm actually originally from the LA area and lived there for 30 years, but still hadn't joined that site just because it's LA and honestly, seeing women half naked, naked, flashing in LA isn't that out of the norm. And didn't mean for any of that previous one to be negative. I just wondered if maybe some of Pamela's content had slipped by like it had by me and still does.
I was surprised to see the word exhibitionism-lite. I actually looked back to see my review of a public/exhibitionist site, Public Flash, from back 4 years ago. Then noticed your much newer review of it. To me, Pamela does as much as the models I saw on Public Flash. I'm not an overly-critical person of any genre except exhibitionism. To me, this site's exhibitionism is as believable as any I've seen and includes ass, pussy, boobs. More and more sites these days are selling themselves as public/exhibitionism, but take Money Talks on Reality Kings as example, they actually show their guys paying restaurant owners to let them film in the restaurant after closing hours. Which kills any believability for me. One of the things I look for in exhibitionism videos is frustration. And you see that a lot in Pamela's scenes. Maybe I'm just reading the "lite" part wrong, but I would take that as not showing everything.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Can be joined through her site and includes 8 bonus sites for $24.95, will explain the better deal, in my opinion, in bottom line.
- 68 photo sets, 1200x798 resolution, all are zipped.
- 109 videos, 720x480, 3000-4000 bitrate
- Mostly solo, plenty of exhibitionism and some girl/girl. There's a catch on the boy/girl content.
- Pamela is a highly charismatic model, she smiles a lot, she giggles, she gets visibly excited when she shows off her body in public, she's playful and as someone who is married to a Latina, Pamela still has the cutest English accent I've heard. Maybe it's the things she says, don't know, but the biggest con is going to be that she no longer is modeling.
- All of her content has stayed on my hard drive since I downloaded it, no deletes and I still go back to it often. Some of these scenes give you a feeling that you're not going to see anything like them again.
- One of the few solo models who doesn't seem to take herself too seriously.
Cons:
- No updates in 2 years
- Would have liked more picture sets and more exhibitionism in her videos.
- The general con theme here is more, more, more.
- The one real con, Pacino did record one hardcore scene of him and Pamela, but it costs $20 to download it in addition to your membership. I don't know if he will ever decide to add that one into the regular content or not.
Bottom Line:
I had said I wasn't going to review this site, but after realizing how much I go back to the content and realizing there are no reviews on it, I thought there should be one since it touches on a niche.
First, Pamela is a very young looking model, from South America. She does have braces, which could be a pro or con for you. She looks really tiny, but once out of her clothes she has a really nice, natural build. Not for sure if she would be a C cup, but pretty close and has the curvy Latina butt. It's hard to tell, but I'm thinking at first Pacino was going to use her more as a barely legal model. Quite a bit of her content plays to her "innocent" look, pigtails, knee-socks, etc...
Her masturbation sets are very believable, she does vaginal and anal masturbation in some. She has several girl/girl videos and like most of Pacino's models, she really seems to enjoy the girl/girl sets, especially the ones with the equally pretty Karen.
What sets Pamela apart though is her exhibitionist side, the innocence gone naughty, she does it as well as any model. A few examples, one set is in a busy bar, it's dim and she flashes her boobs at least 6-7 times with people walking right by. She has a couple of park scenes where she sits on a wall in a skirt and slides her panties over while people walk by, even touches herself in parts and makes comments about, "my pussy is wet". The believability of her sets is as high as any model I've seen. These exhibitionist sets contribute to the credibility of her other sets.
The bad news is that she isn't modeling anymore and hasn't been since 2008.
The good news is, you can join Pacino's Adventures, which is updating and has HD content of Latina amateur models and Pamela's site is included as a bonus site. For someone that has never joined Pacino's Adventures this is a great deal since I personally think Pamela's site alone would be worth joining for one month for the exhibitionism lover.
You can join through Pamela's site for $5 less and it does include the good site La Zona Modelos, and 5-6 other solo model sites Pacino has had that have stopped updating. It's hard to call it a network since all of these sites have been standalone sites at one point or another.
The video specs aren't great, but they are DVD quality and look good enough.
I would recommend it to exhibitionism fans just by itself. It's hard to make an estimate, but I'm saying a minimum of 1/4 of the videos have exhibitionism in them. These stand out because of the look of naughty, trying to be innocent, joy on her face. Some of it seems completely spontaneous too. Very good masturbation model too, the masturbation in the sex toy store is as hot as any solo scene I've seen.
It's probably not for everyone, some of the exhibitionism videos may take 3-4 minutes before you see any skin. Exhibitionism fans probably already expect that, but thought I would mention it. I recommend joining through Pacino's Adventures and getting it as a bonus site.
I didn't see a reason for a review since this site is now considered free as part of the Pacino's Adventures sites, but it's still worth noting. This site, I assume, used to be a standalone solo site. Pamela Spice is the model and she's a very cute, traditional Latina model with all-natural body. There's more under those clothes than my eyes realized.
The numbers, to me, are quite impressive for a bonus site. A total of 109 videos, 68 photo sets for a total of 25.7 GB. The videos are 720x480, pictures are only 1200 long end, but are zipped.
Where the site separates itself from most solo sites are the exhibitionist scenes. This is a rough estimate when I say at least 1/4 of the scenes involve exhibitionism. If you're a fan of exhibitionism then you know what I'm talking about when I see you can "see" how much of an exhibitionist she is. She really gets into these scenes and does everything possible to at least get a nipple slip even with a bar full of people.
A few more examples of the exhibitionism. One scene has her behind the guardrail of a very busy highway, full flashing and touching herself as cars go by. One is in a bar/club and that one even has a few pantyless upskirts and boob flashing. One is in broad daylight on the front dining area of a restaurant though she doesn't get to show much since the patrons keep walking in and out. One is having a breakfast at a restaurant that includes full flashing, upskirt pulling panties over as staff members are walking around. Several in parks with people walking by. Though not really a typical exhibitionism scene, the one in the taxi is one of the best. The driver is focused and she is masturbating in the backseat complete with moans.
This ended up being my favorite of the Pacino sites and she's become my favorite of his regular models.
I wasn't for sure I wanted Golden Girls to be too believable! I remember really liking the show, but don't remember too much arousal factor. The one I noticed most was That 70s Show since I always thought Mila Kunis was really sexy and it looks like they pulled it off pretty well. Really, I'm surprised more sites don't try the celebrity look-a-like sets more often.
I don't watch a lot of tv these days, but got a promo special offer in email for this site from New Sensations. Thought I would take a look and have to say, while I don't know a few of these shows in their real form, the ones I do are pretty impressive when it comes to finding porn stars that resemble the real cast of these shows. I noticed though on the TBP facts that there are no downloads for the videos. Still worth a preview visit to see the similarities.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Fetish Network included, this site is sort of the headliner site.
- Movies are pretty good quality 640 on high end, around 1400 speed.
- If you have an exhibitionist or voyeur side this one is for you!
- Pictues were a surprise, over 1200 on high end even on old sets and are zipped
- Download speeds are just above average in the USA
Cons:
- The price! This network costs 39.95 Euros, I didn't realize there was a big difference in the Euro and Dollar, it ended up around $55 for the network for one month.
- This site itself has a great idea, but they may overuse the male stripper parts.
- The download speeds are inconsistent, going from 900 kb/s on one video to 400 kb/s on the next to 1200 kb/s on the next.
- Not enough actual sex going on.
Bottom Line:
I had seen the previews of this site for the better part of a year. My wife loves exhibitionism and voyeuristic material, and I do to a point as well. The video we had watched as previews were all action-filled 30 second clips. So, I decided to just join the entire network, instead of just one site.
The basis for this site is that there are women, usually what you would call average looking, and they are at an all male strip club. Male strippers tease them until an orgy breaks out.
Now for the problem, some of the videos are just the male strippers dancing around naked. Now this is no use to me. I'm not talking about 5 minutes, but 15-20 minutes of men dancing around while stripping. Not good.
It does get better, there are paid women there to get the women turned on. The paid women grab the male strippers and start giving them a blowjob in front of other women, who then decide to try it for themselves. This part of the video is great. Some of these women seriously blush, they look away and laugh too.
The quality is very good, videos look good and so do the pictures. There is one problem though, you have 12 male strippers having sex at one time. There is always this one really sexy woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. Other than that, this site is pretty good. I can't say I recommend it unless you are really into the group sex. Navigation is plain, scroll, click, download. If you like group sex, it is one of the best!
I don't know about now but when I joined their full upgrade network ($65) it seems to have given me lifetime access and there are no other charges. I didn't know whether to post that and possibly give false information about how it works now. It almost feels like this is the way it's supposed to be too. When I joined the upgrade network, I did so through Porn Pros. I only had access to Porn Pros for that 1 month. These premium standalone sites are still accessible. I also didn't know whether to post it since I know a few of us Porn Users took advantage of the $65 offer and I believe they still have access to the premium standalone sites too. I wondered if they are doing that to try and get us to take the next upgrade which adds, I think 14 more sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I believe deserves billing over a lot of the teen hardcore sites.
- The site is huge as a standalone with 1,377 scenes if my math is right. You’d think I would use that calculator button on my keyboard.
- Good price for this site even as a standalone with a PU discount.
- The network upgrade you can add to this site is worth it if you don’t mind paying $65.
- The site features mostly hardcore male/female with some threesomes thrown in for good measure.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Photos with downloads but they aren’t going to make any of the photo sites jealous.
- Very good video quality all the way through the site (bottom line will cover that)
- Still updating with one scene per week. Each scene has a video, photos and screencaps, unlimited downloads.
Cons:
- The older scenes don’t have the video quality (resolution) or options of the newer ones.
- They would offer you an upgrade if you upgraded twice. And they do have an ad that pops up each time you sign in.
- This covers all their sites (upgrades), just make sure I know you don’t care about pictures. The picture download filenames are are all titled “gallery”.
Bottom Line:
This site by itself is in the same league of sites like Nubiles (I prefer this site) and the other teen hardcore sites. It is still updating with one update per week and there are 1,377 scenes so this is not a typical premium standalone site. Those rarely have over 500 scenes.
The video quality on the newest scenes includes 4K mp4, 1080p mp4, 720p mp4, 720p WMV (does anyone still watch those?) and 480p mp4. The oldest scenes see a dropoff. Those have a file extension I’ve not seen in years, mpeg and it’s the highest quality available on those oldest scenes at 720p with 4000 bitrate. Those also have a 720p WMV with only 2000 bitrate and there is a 420p with 1000 bitrate option.
There also are not photos on all of the older scenes. I don’t think any of this is that much of a dealbreaker but should be noted. This is the only site of the Porn Pros Premium Standalone sites that runs into some navigation issues. There are no tags. The search only works if you know who you’re looking for and even then I don’t trust it. Besides those minor complaints, they do still offer 720p on their oldest scenes and the newest scenes are as good of quality as 95% or higher of all sites.
The site needs better navigation. When you only have 36 or even 360 scenes, the navigation doesn’t matter as much but once you’re over 1,000 scenes, that’s 115 pages of 12 scenes per page. That’s a lot of clicking. I run my wireless mouse battery out trying to go through this site’s content.
The models step up to save the day again. The newest model is new to me and she may just get her own folder in my collection. Her name is Catalina Ossa. Vina Sky has scenes here too and where they nailed the navigation? When you go to a model’s page or a scene with the model in it. They make sure to show you every other scene the model has on their other premium standalone sites. Which is a shitty move but if you have the upgrade package you can just jump right to the models other scenes on their other sites. Which helps absorb that $65 upgrade price.
I don’t think this site is supposed to be like the hub of their premium network since I’m guessing a lot of people will only join one of the sites and not do the upgrade but this site does work well as a hub if you purchase the network upgrade. There is more content on this site and that makes it easy to switch from site to site. You do have to login in every site if you do the upgrade.
As a standalone this site would be easily recommended. As part of the network, it’s even easier to recommend and does contain probably close to as much content as all the other premium standalone sites on the network combined. I haven’t even gone through the entire network and have been a member for almost 3 months. I not only recommend this site as a standalone but will even recommend the first upgrade. No idea where that second upgrade is going to take you. Even if you’re not interested in upgrading to the network, this site is worth looking into as just a standalone site especially with the PU discounted price and weekly updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Possibly the biggest updates on the internet, 5 photo sets per day AND 4 new videos per day
- Has one of the most helpful forum and webmaster that I have talked to.
- Huge amount of videos and pictures...see cons
- Has solo, b/g, g/g so it isn't as softcore as I thought it would be
- Site navigation is well above average
Cons:
- Pictures and videos are more in the quanity over quality group. Not that either looks bad, but they could be better, especially the videos.
- One very strange name usage for one model. Anetta Keys goes by Linda on here, I was a member for a week before finding her content.
- Some of the content is on other similar "niche" sites
- For some reason I am not getting good download speeds. On 10M connection, I get 600 kbp/s. Average for me is 900-1000.
Bottom Line:
I kind of feel bad giving this site "just" an 80, but some of the best content, I already have in higher quality. I loved the Anetta content once I found it under the name Linda P, Paul has 20 sets of Anetta.
The videos are starting to look bad with more and more sites seeing 640 x 480 as the norm, this one is still in the 300ish x 200ish days. It is definitely a site that focuses more on quanity than quality. I don't mean that as a bad thing, since this site would score 10 points higher if I didn't already have most of the best content on here.
The women for the most part are pretty. One thing that I didn't like about the site is the over-emphasis on "young" women. I would guess that 50% of the pic sets has the obligatory pinky between the teeth pose and I've had a problem with other sites because of this as well.
The pictures are a little above average in size, but they could maybe drop a picture set update set and get these pictures up to 2000 on the high end. The content is good overall. Though for once I found myself not following the members' reviews on the movies. I felt like I was out of place on this site.
My recommendation will come if either of these things are true for you. You are into the very cute, young models style of posing or you like one of the models on the site. Paul has an excellent preview that reminds me of Teen Dreams' preview. Check to see if there are any of your favorites, if either of these holds true for you then I recommend!
Another site that does this is Mac and Bumble, or they did the last time I was on it. I don't think it was so much your fault as you may think. Penthouse's join page says, "One month access" for the join price with no asterisks or small print. One month access should mean for the next 30 days you have access to the site since you paid for 1 month access. Also don't see anything in their terms of service about it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The best site of old favorite porn magazines (Hustler, Playboy, Penthouse)
- I’m not for sure if something has changed but you can now download the videos and they even have 4K downloads.
- Good for those of us that prefer the late 90s/early 2000s style of porn, especially lesbian scenes. Very similar to Vivid.
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Pretty models but very few amateurs
- Over 3,000 models
Cons:
- The production is good but it feels like it is stuck in the past.
- Not as much fun as buying a new Penthouse in the 90s.
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite stories to tell about porn involves Penthouse magazines. I remember getting off work as a teenager and being excited knowing the local gas station had the new Penthouse. It is the one experience internet porn cannot replace. The anxiety, the nervousness, of walking in a store and asking a real person (usually a hot woman) to sell you pornography.
I hadn’t joined Penthouse Gold in years until I received a holiday promo email. I can’t complain much about the site or value. The site lives up to expectations of past pornography magazines. Stellar quality photos, great lighting and just a professional feel on neary everything. This site would be my favorite if this was 2007. The glam look on the models. The sexy lesbian scenes. The same thing I remember seeing in Penthouse March 1998 issue. Nostalgia only makes it so far in porn.
The part that takes me back to 2007 is me saying a porn site is only as good as its models. I still believe that. Give me all the technical bells and whistles but if the models are not attractive, I won’t care about the bells and whistles. Penthouse, maybe more than any site or brand has some of the prettiest, glam models in porn’s history.
I was surprised to see the 4K downloads but didn’t download those. I am still okay with 720p. The picture sets come in the expected downloadable zips. The photos are also sharp in contrast and maybe a little glossy, just like the old magazines used to be until you got the pages sticky.
There does not look to be any kind of limits on downloads. The biller is Penthouse themselves and it works as well as you would expect. It’s a very easy to use site. The model list may keep you occupied for a few days just looking at all the pretty women. The pictures do live up to expectations as well. I would go as far as saying the pictures are the best on the internet. Not based on technical quality. The photos go up to 2500 long end and that’s small compared to photo sites but the poses, production, direction and outfits show that Penthouse understands how important all those are to making quality pictures.
That’s how I will base my recommendation. The videos are good but the photos are better and should be the main reason you join this site. If this was 2007, I would score this a 97 or 98 but it’s 2023. I can appreciate the work they put into the photos but it’s just not enough in 2023.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some incredibly flexible models
- Vid quality is decent but could be better, at most 500 on high end. Does have decent 1000+ bitrate
- The old fetish has kind of been satisfied, what was it that I saw up those cheerleaders skirts, if that was ever a fetish for you, this does a good job on it.
- Women are very free with their bodies, fists, dildos, all while wrapping their legs around their neck.
- Has something of an erotic artsy feel in a good way.
Cons:
- Let me get this out first, this site is not only featuring incredibly flexible women, it is also incredibly boring.
- Overpriced for amount of content, should be $14.95, instead it is $34.95.
- Videos are grainy in full screen
- Pics are useless, they take up about 1/4th of my monitor screen, below 1000 on the high end.
- Very repetitive sets
Bottom Line:
These women are real gymnast/ballet dancers/contortionists. The erotic side of this site is very high. You almost feel like you are watching these women stretch, get themselves turned on, then masturbating for you to watch. The only problem and is something I should have listed in the cons is that a good portion of these models do wear masks or half masks, which takes the fantasy of watching an unknowing woman away.
I used to get samples on TGP sites from Perfect Flex, and often thought, "I bet the site shows much more" I was wrong. They do masturbate and even fist, but I'm telling you if you are like me you are going to start feeling like, "Well, they are just doing that for the money". While I agree most models are, at least make me think that isn't true.
I believe most of the models are probably from Russia, very pretty women, if you like toned and fit women. The navigation is about as good as I would expect since I don't believe any of these models are actual porn stars. If you've ever seen the model, Veronika Simon's body, that is the bodies these models have. It still comes off as boring. I really don't have any major complaints except with the price. Videos could be better, pics definitely need to be better, but I could deal with both if they lowered the price and got the models more into what they are doing. Recommended only for those people who have a fetish of a nude woman stretching. Just keep in mind, they all do the same poses, it is just a dull site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high quality network of mostly niche specific sites.
- Now includes 10 sites instead of the 7-8 usually advertised (see bottom line).
- One of the best, deepest, tag systems in the industry.
- Unlimited downloads of screencaps and videos.
- 1,176 mostly European models.
- Good download speeds.
- Much improved navigation from my last visit.
- Technical quality, especially on videos, could be unmatched or at worst is in the top 5%.
- Updates across the network every 5 days.
Cons:
- The last time I was here they had removed Give Me Pink, my favorite of the DEV 8 sites, it's back but it's not updating.
- Kind of like a book filled with pictures and no words. None of the sites feature anything close to a story which is the point of Gonzo but a lot of people don't know that.
Bottom Line:
Several years ago, I gave this network an average score by my standards. It probably wasn't fair of me but back then they just up and removed the Give Me Pink content in the middle of my subscription. You can look at the TBP review and see that Give Me Pink isn't listed as one of the sites in the "Network sites" but it is now included again as is Fist Flush which also isn't listed in the "Network sites" of the TBP review.
The interesting part is both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush are also included in the network Sapphix that comes with those two sites and Sapphic Erotica. This presents a new problem.
The three newest scenes on Give Me Pink included with Perfect Gonzo were released on 2/4/19, 3/31/17 and 3/13/17, making it nothing more than an archive site on Perfect Gonzo. On Sapphix, the three newest Give Me Pink scenes were released on 3/28/20, 3/23/20 and 3/13/20. Ugh.
I would guess Perfect Gonzo has some rights to the older Give Me Pink scenes and have those while Sapphix has the whole collection of Give Me Pink scenes including the newest scenes.
I won't take off as much as I did before since Perfect Gonzo at least has some of the older Give Me Pink scenes but make note if you're a Give Me Pink fan you'll need to also join Sapphix to get the newest updates since 2017.
One of the "negatives" with this network is some of these sites had long dead periods. Like MILF Thing, it had a gap between updates from 2008 to 2015 with 0 updates. That does cause a big difference in technical quality.
Having said that, it's also one their top pro. These guys have been shooting HD (720p in early 2007), (1080p in late 2007 and beyond) for longer than any site I know of. They started adding 4K in 2014. Even those old scenes are HD and worth downloading, especially for collectors.
Their extensive tagging system is one of the best in the industry though they do go a little too specific at times. To humor myself and you, you could search for a blonde, athletic model with an apple butt, teardrop boobs, light skin toned with a big clit, trimmed pubic hair, tattooed with green eyes, with a ponytail who's wearing a corset, having sex on the kitchen table with twerking that leads into anal gaping. That's some serious tagging options.
The download options since 2014 include 4K (12-20 GB each scene), 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. The newer photos/screencaps are downloadable in zips that are sometimes larger than 1GB each. Those photos are 5000 long end.
It's hard to argue against their technical excellence. The question becomes how important is Give Me Pink to you? To show the differences, I also have a Sapphix account and they have 405 Give Me Pink scenes while Perfect Gonzo only has 338. Being a lover of solo porn, Give Me Pink, is one of my favorite sites.
Something I found interesting, you all know Eve Angel was my favorite model from 2006-2013, her first Give Me Pink scene on Sapphix only has a 260p download (2004), the same scene on Perfect Gonzo has a 384p version.
In the perfect world we could just join both Sapphix and Perfect Gonzo which would add Sapphic Erotica to it all.
Overall, I think even without the newest 70 or so Give Me Pink scenes, Perfect Gonzo is a very good deal and network that excels at both quality and quantity ... unless you want a story with the scenes. They cover quite a few niches, most of the sex is hardcore, nearing rough, with 348 DP scenes, 1,096 anal scenes and we'll throw a more extreme one in with 583 scenes tagged as "throat fucking".
Look Ben, you're 66 and I'm 42. This is turning into a foolish, childish argument. Let it go. Write a review for Perfect Gonzo and use any words you think fit. I'm actually being encouraging to you here. I honestly thought you were a younger person just looking to argue. You should know better than to argue about opinions ... I do and won't anymore.
You're missing the concept at this point.
First, yes, I had an ax to grind with the webmaster. It's called me paying for a month membership and him allowing me to be locked out for 2 weeks without doing anything to fix the situation. Tell you what, go pay your power or gas bill, then let them cut your power or gas off for two weeks and see if you suddenly have an ax to grind.
Second, everything I posted was true. If it wasn't, the webmaster would be here denying it.
Third, you've been a member here for 4.5 years and have posted 0 reviews. You find it easy to criticize my review style, but you've not found it easy to write a review yourself? As for my review style, I choose to post facts, not personal opinions, I will sometimes add personal opinions, but the facts are my priority. You use words like, "raunchy" and "sensual". Those are very subjective words. What I see as raunchy, you see as sensual and what I see as sensual, you see as raunchy. Meaning, if I used those words in my reviews, it could mislead you. Instead, I give you the facts, you can then go look at the content yourself and decide if the combination of facts and whatever content it is, is the type of site you would like to join.
Hey this is a review site. It's my review. I write what I want. Don't read it. If I need to take every character in the character limit, I will. When you buy Porn Users and start marking decisions around here, then you can limit me to whatever character limit you would prefer, but until then ... don't read it. Don't push reply. You made it longer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very large network of some classic sites and some good newer sites.
- Give Me Pink is the top site for me and it looks like they've added it back now 4/22/2017.
- Excellent technical quality throughout the network including a relatively high number of 4k scenes, no use to me, but it's worth mentioning.
- Navigation is okay. If you mess with the tags enough you'll find that the navigation is good, but if you're impatient with the tags, you'll think it's pretty bad.
- Very good photo sets, would compare their quality to In the Crack and once questioned if Give Me Pink and In the Crack were the same company.
- Download speed is good, I'm now able to max download on porn sites at 10MB/s, I'm able to get around 8MB/s on Perfect Gonzo. Most porn sites give me 5-6 MB/s.
- Good update schedule, 10 updates so far in April, two are interviews and there were 13 updates in March, so nearly every other day.
- Huge price savings over what these sites used to cost.
Cons:
- Well, to start with, I spent the first 12 days of my membership locked out of my account. It's not a glitch or fluke. They even have a link on their login page that says, "Can't login? Forgot your password? Blocked account? Try our unblocking tool here!" Will further this in BL.
- Sites disappear then reappear. Both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush were included in the network when I signed up, then after the 12 days of being locked out, they were both gone. Now, 5 days later, they are back.
- Seems they struggle with real, legit criticism as seen by someone posting a comment to mock mine. A person who admits they were given a free membership. Mr. Perfect Gonzo webmaster, you own or run a site in an industry that has zero integrity, don't give people a reason to question yours.
- Interviews. I'm tired of disputing these with webmasters. I joined a porn site not a get to know me site.
Bottom Line:
This network intrigued as much as any network I've ever seen. One exception might be the Kink Network, but even so, Perfect Gonzo has multiple sites in it that I used to pay $29.99 a month for each one. I also had been under the impression that sites like Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic were lost in the Euro porn meltdown of 2009-2011. But now all of a sudden, those sites are going strong as is the whole network.
The technical quality here should be a big draw for those who like the big resolutions. They have 4k videos dating back to October 2014. Maybe more impressive, they have 1080p dating back to 2006. These videos also have smaller resolutions for download as well. Their picture sets are downloadable and the newer ones are 5000 long end. This part of the site is very impressive to say the least.
The navigation is good, at least to me, it's a clean network hub page that has a few easy to miss helpful parts. There's a drop-down box that allows you to filter the updates to a specific site within the network. There's tags that include the separate sites, actions, to filter the updates to your taste or interest. They even have a bonus section that has content from Blacked, Cum Louder, Teen Dreams, Sapphic Erotica, though I did watch a few of the scenes and wonder if they're just cut portions of the scenes. Still, everything is looking really good.
They use Epoch as a biller which is always a plus. The models are top-tier. You'll mostly see a bunch of Euro models, especially if you go into the older content as these sites used to be almost exclusively Euro. I'll even say a thank you to them for putting a picture zip download link in with the download links for the videos. It's a small thing, but most of us get frustrated with having to back out of video downloads, click on photos, click on download photos.
There's a good blend of genres on the network. There's solo girls, lesbian scenes, creampie, gangbang, pretty much everything you can think of outside of gay or transsexual.
At this point, I honestly believe the network is a 90+
But ... I'm now halfway through my membership and have had access to the network for only 3 days, have seen Give Me Pink content just for 2 days. Looking at my email account, I have 9 emails between Perfect Gonzo and Epoch about the login problems. Not a single one of the Perfect Gonzo ones are from an employee, a webmaster, but instead are automated emails that insist my password hadn't changed, even though it wouldn't work. On top of that, there's the link on the login page that says if your account was locked, to click the link and it will refresh your account. I did it 3 different times, loading time for the page was 3-5 minutes. It would then tell me a new password had been sent to my email. I would go check ... no email with a new password. I would check Spam/Junk ... no email. Then when I did have access, right after signing up, the Give Me Pink and Fist Flush content disappeared. As of today, 4/23/2017, both of those sites are back on this network with all their content.
I can accept glitches and any kind of technical problems, but did I really need to have 9 emails, 3 attempted password refreshes and 13 days of no access just to get the access I had paid for? I'll again point out the comment left here on PU to offset and mock mine. I'm knocking 10 points off the review for that.
This network is plenty good enough to let its content do its talking for it. One of the best I've seen when it's not removing sites or blocking access. But worse than that is when a paying member is mocked by a member who received free access. As Khan used to say, "A shill is still a shill no matter what color you paint it."
Overall content numbers:
Roughly 2,050 full scenes, each includes video and picture set as of 4/23/2017.
10 different websites within the network. Several of which I've paid $29.99/month to be a member of in the past.
I would normally say this content is exclusive, but can no longer say that since Give Me Pink and Fist Flush also come with a Sapphic Erotica membership.
If they can get over the technical problems with the site and keep those 10 sites in their network, I wouldn't be surprised if this ended up being one of the top 10 sites in the porn world. It's that good, but they need to stop me from saying "but" before I rate it that high. Paying $30 for a site in this day and age is a bit high, but I could still see it being worth that. As it is though, I'm going to end up receiving about 16 days of membership for $30.
You can do the math. I subtracted 10 points for the overall frustration between the site, lack of responses, the shill comment to offset my real, paying member legitimate complaint and see how high this network could score if all that gets fixed.
Thanks for the play on my negative comment about the site. You know they say imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.
Since you've been able to contact their webmaster and receive free memberships, which obviously have no bearing on your overly-positive comment, let him know these things:
He should fix his login page since it still lists Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as their sites.
He should spend more time taking care of paying customers than giving memberships to people who go kiss his ass on sites like this one.
Tell him his customer service was so non-existent that Epoch themselves did the refresh of my subscription so I could access the site again. Then apologized for him not fixing the issue.
I honestly had backed away and edited my comment about the site, but you've just bought David a full review of the bullshit he's selling. It will be fair, might not be that bad of a score, but all the deception will be pointed out. So, tell David to be watching for it. I have timestamped screenshots of everything so tell him not to try and go fix everything.
I didn't even realize this network existed until last week. I ended up having to contact Epoch. The network itself kept saying it had refreshed my login, but it never worked. Epoch contacted me back and said they had it refreshed. Sure enough, it worked. I do think Sapphic bought Give Me Pink and Fistflush, I didn't realize I had spam email from Sapphic about adding both of those sites to their monthly membership to Sapphic Erotica.
I'm not editing the title, but am the comment.
I tried for 3 straight nights to login, clicked their refresh password link (received no email with a new password) and finally just sent an email to the biller Epoch.
Epoch had the account refreshed in less than 3 hours and I'm back to having access. I received zero help from the network itself or their support tickets. So, overall it was still a bad experience with the site itself.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My wife was a ballerina and she’s petite. You know I’m interested.
- The site is very small, only 39 scenes, it does say it’s active but no updates since September 2019.
- All scenes have 1080p as the highest resolution, but all scenes have it. They have the smaller resolutions, too.
- Fast download speeds at 90% of my max.
- CCBill is the biller.
- It fits the niche well. I will say a little more about ballerinas and maybe they have a no pun intended shortage of models that are ballerinas?
Cons:
- No updates and 39 scenes works more as a tease for me.
- It’s very softcore even when it’s hardcore sex. It really tries to live up to the niche. It’s kind of artsy.
Bottom Line:
I know from real-life experience that there is not a big market anymore for ballet. It makes me wonder if they just can’t find enough ballerinas that are petite, to fuck. It is kind of sad from a porn perspective. This is a niche I believe could be very popular. You’ve got a lot to work with. Flexible women, smaller builds, teasing, and even turning them loose and having them go wild. You don’t really see that in these scenes. I have downloaded all of the scenes. The scenes are not that well thought-out. Some of the scenes are well under 20 minutes. I would take at least 10 minutes to let the ballerina do pirouettes and kick her leg up on the wall. Give some wardrobe slips. I would do something more that focused on the ballerina. That’s how you turn them wild. Pay attention to them for 10 minutes. Give them the spotlight and you will be happy with the result.
This is a Nubiles site. You get the 1080p, 720p, 540p or whatever that middle one is they do and a few mobile ones. I can tell you that downloading all 39 scenes didn’t hit a limit. I also downloaded the photos. It shows that Nubiles knew what they were doing with the pictures. The pictures are 8000 long end. You can get some wardrobe slips in there. They have 20-25 of just the ballerina. It then adds the guy and it shows they didn’t know what they were doing. It should have been 50+ of the ballerina.
The ballerinas they have are pretty and cute. They don’t exactly give off a sexual vibe. That could be the country they are from. I don’t know if these models are or were real ballerinas. My wife looked at some of it. She kind of gave me the twisted nose like, “nope”. If Brandi Love can have 487 stepchildren we can act like they are ballerinas. Which would mean they didn’t run out of ballerinas. I think that is the problem with the site. It tries really hard to stay in that ballet training area and it’s very softcore even during the sex. It’s good enough if you’re really into the niche. I don’t recognize most of the models. It’s not that unusual for me not to know newer models but I usually know a few. I’m guessing these women are from Russia. That is the downfall of using ballet or ballerina as a niche. There’s not a lot here to convince me that’s a ballerina. She is cute, she’s little and she has the right costume on but she’s not very disciplined. This niche could be so much better with the right producer and director. You could work heavy teasing in, clothing fetishes, wardrobe malfunctions but you would have to get away from that very softcore side.
Overall, the site is okay. It’s another freebie for joining Nubiles Porn. I didn’t see much here that’s different than what I saw on Petite HD Porn, also owned by Nubiles. The costume even is not fully updated. That’s a stereotypical costume. I think porn producers are missing out on a whole group of potential models by moving away from women that dance. They like to perform. They like the spotlight. That’s 2/3 of being a porn star. I am being serious. I believe in the right hands this niche could create a very strong site. I have seen the Russian attempts with the contortionists posing as ballerinas. Those were too softcore. It’s that personality contrast. These ballerinas are highly-disciplined. They don’t do anything too risky. You let them. They go wild. There’s my gift to porn producers. This site is a good site to look at if you have a Nubiles membership. It’s not much more than that. I will probably keep the videos just to look over them all but I haven’t seen anything that special about the ones I’ve watched.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite niches. I think petite women are better for porn. They fit in the screen.
- It’s not updating but it has 228 scenes. There is a site size that makes “not updating” not as important to me. With 228 scenes, I can deal with it not updating.
- A lot of known models. Most of the models are very attractive.
- You can download the photosets, screencaps and videos. All are high quality.
- Good camerawork and I’m going to say it’s because the models are petite. A lot of good closeups.
- Very good download speeds (85% my max)
- Uses CCBill as the billing processor.
Cons:
- It has that vanilla side to it. It’s not bad sex. It’s just they are having sex to be filmed. I don’t know where you draw the line on that.
- Not much variety in the scenes. I will talk about that in the bottom line, that is the downside to petite models.
Bottom Line:
I’m jumping right in with that last con. The best scene from July 2020 to January 2021 is of the model Mina. It is called “You Make Me Want To”. Mina is not only petite, she is also very sexy and she gets up on the bathroom sink with her butt hanging off the edge as a sexual position. That’s the downside to petite models. I expect things like that. I think that is also one of the strengths of petite models. They’re generally more flexible and don’t need as much camera coverage to show all their body. That scene would not be good with a taller woman. Her legs would get in the way. The downside is not all of the models can do these creative positions. I just believe that’s an advantage petite models have but do not take advantage of.
Whatever theme they have on this site is very limited. There are some solo scenes. Which I am always fine with. There’s not much other variety. There are some lesbian scenes. I don’t see anything out of the ordinary with their themes. It’s straightforward and it’s not as much as an insult as it may sound … vanilla. I like vanilla myself. It’s just the scenes are similar and that could be the one turnoff. I think that’s even more of a turnoff than not updating.
The site has 228 scenes. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K. There isn’t a limit unless I haven’t tried. I don’t see one or any warnings. The photos are always a bonus on Nubiles sites. Those are nearly 6000 long end on the newest ones. The navigation is very good. It’s an easy site to use and download from. I do believe there is a place for this type or porn. It is higher quality than average porn. The models make that happen. The pictures are far above average. Your main concern with this site should be if you get bored with naked people. A lot of times the sexiest part is the title of the scene. They do a good enough job on those to get you interested in the scene. Some of the scenes don’t live up to expectations.
You do get Nubiles network and that makes this site a very acceptable supporting site. I don’t know if they have given up on it. A petite porn site always has potential. That is an old fetish that has been around since, watch the porn history memories, Gauge. She was the petite model that took the internet by storm just after 2000. You can get that energy and passion she had from any of these petite models and it makes for good porn. The site itself couldn’t stand on its own but as a network site it does a good job of offering something different. You have to watch the scenes to find out if a model like Mina is going hop up on the bathroom sink in doggystyle. It’s kind of like a magic trick by having petite models. There’s suspense. I haven’t mentioned this in a review in a long time. They do and have as far as I can remember, use CCBill. I have never had a problem with Nubiles sites or billing with CCBill. That could be a deciding factor for someone.
Good site but it is not the best petite site I have seen. I would recommend hiring Mina as a solo model and just shooting her scenes. Her scene is worth a membership. That’s one of those you download in all download options to make sure you’re future proof.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
