I know all about the 21st Sextury network that lets you get two new sites each month you let your bill recur, but I just happened to see this site and wanted to see what it was about. It is a 21st Sextury site and is $29.95 per month, for what looks to be about 25 movies. Anyway, as I was scanning through the preview, at the bottom it has the normal list of 21st Sextury sites, but it says, "You get instant access to 33+ exclusive sites" On down the page it says, "Join now and you will get 2 additional websites per month that you are a member".
Now, maybe it is me but if it says that I get access to 33 sites instantly, that should mean I don't have to stay a member for months to get the other sites. One of the sites they show included is Sweet Sophie Moone, which is $29.95 itself. Maybe one of their webmasters could clear this up for us so we can take advantage of this if it is true?
They removed it awhile back. I went to join the trial not long after that review to get the rest of the Skillful Hands content, but it was gone and even worse, they've changed the Skillful Hands site. It used to be exclusive content, now they just add scenes from DVDs that are available at any DVD site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Skilfulhands is a very good handjob site on this network, strap on bangers is a pretty good one too.
- The trial is full access and the site allows you to use download managers.
- You get over 60 sites with the network
- Has plenty of odd fetish sites and several mature sites as well
- Very good download speeds, some sites are updating
Cons:
- Where to start? You have to sign in on every site, that is over 60 times if you check out each site
- Most of the sites are overlapping in material, with as many as 3 mature sites that could easily be put on one site.
- Payment can be confusing, go through Segpay to get the trial
Bottom Line:
There are some updates, but my guess is that this network is nearing the end. The navigation is probably the worst I have seen. No model names that I can find, instead, you just scroll through pages of thumbnails. Finding pictures is even a task on here. Some sites say, "Galleria" which is where I would expect pictures to be, but then the pictures end up in the link titled, "Pics".
It is also home to the much unusual, Midget Orgies. You got mature, chunky angels, shemales doing women, women doing men (strap on), shemales doing straight males and well, you get the picture. Each of these has their own site. I'm actually rating it higher than TBP did for Skilfulhands.com. Really fast servers, probably because there aren't a lot of members.
Sexy Nubiles looks promising, but I honestly became tired of scrolling the pages. The other 60 or so sites, bleh at best.
Now for the biggest complaint. Why do sites have a problem with finding someone to spell or proofread for them? I kid you not, one model named Britney, her name is misspelled on 3 straight clips, "Brintey", "Briney" and "Britny" come on people, at least make it look professional. Misspellings are all across this network, every page.
Overall, the trial is recommended for the price of $7.95. You are sure to get your money worth at that price, but not a nickel more.
I think Rocketpay is okay. I don't like that they want you to use the "remember me" feature, which recognizes you if you join a different site that uses Rocketpay and tries to pull-up your past payment info. I'm sure they're trying to be helpful, but the last time it pulled one of mine up, it was a card that expired in 2012.
I don't know exactly how credit card processors work these days, but I do know that they charge a fee for their full-services. The sites lower their costs by having the sign-up and cancel pages on their sites, instead of having separate CCBill sign-up and cancel pages. It also allows sites to include things like surveys when you go to cancel. Mano Job does that. It's five basic questions like, "What would you like to see on our site?" and "How can we make our site better?"
The cancellation link is on the main page of the site at the top. You'll see "support". When you click it, the drop-down menu comes up and has "cancel" as an option. From there you cancel just like you would on CCBill or Epoch and they do send a cancellation confirmation email too. They seem like pretty decent people. I posted a comment about one of their sites being broken and they had it fixed almost immediately.
Oh and Rocketpay has been around for awhile. They used to be the primary for all of the Kink sites. And I know I touched on it in my review, but there's no DL Limit unless I missed a point. On my last night of the membership, I downloaded 142 GB and didn't hit a limit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best handjob site on the internet and it's not even close.
- Has network access with it, but I scored this site 9 points higher than the network, it's a miring network that takes away from this site.
- Unlike the rest of the network, Mano Job is updating with new content and isn't recycling.
- An unheard of, unmatched, roughly 800 handjob videos.
- Some well-known models and some that I probably just don't know by names.
- Probably internet porn's best tagging system. Will go more into this in BL.
- They experiment with niches by adding CFNM elements to some scenes, and using the various actions that are well-tagged and easy to find.
- Very good download speeds.
- Excellent technical quality on this site with over 700 of those videos having 1080p option. Also pictures with zips if interested in those.
Cons:
- Is it fair to say the network it's on? The main two other sites in the network are recycling, which causes me to think the whole network is recycling. When on the network's hub, you get a mix from the 3 sites so it takes away from the Mano Job content.
- I think its price is a little high, it's fairly unique content and they do it better than anyone, but it's $30.
- There's still a listed but undefined download limit. I really don't believe it's there.
- Really the only real con is the common one. It's a niche site and all scenes are fairly similar, it can and does become boring.
Bottom Line:
I have only scored a site from a network, higher than its network, one time before this. Think it was Nubiles.net. I actually think in this case it's a big difference. The network this site is on has around 1,300 scenes. A little over 800 of those scenes are on this site, Mano Job. I've been told, "You don't have to go to the other sites", it's not the point. If you sell me something as a network, then I have expectations. Because I brought up some rather negative points about the network, I thought it was only right and fair for me to come back and post something more positive about this site. One more part on this, the site Chelci Fox, which isn't advertised as included, but is included as you find out later in your membership, is now fixed and operational. Good job by them to update the certificate or whatever it was that was causing a problem. There's a full explanation in the comment section on that problem.
I think the first big question here is "is Mano Job recycling?" My instinct tells me no. They're updating quite a bit, I think 16 out of the 19 days of December, so far, but these scenes look new. I hate that I'm not as caught up on the current models, but will say one of the December updates if of Roxy Deville, who I do know is retired. It could be something they recorded before she retired and are just now getting around to releasing. Most of the rest of the models aren't familiar to me.
Why would I make such a bold claim as "the best handjob site"? Simple. Handjob sites are notorious for having repeat models, not just a few or the not intended pun of a handful of times, but many handjob sites have about 12-15 women who they use for 100 scenes. I still believe this site is somehow related to Fucked Hard 18 and the models here are very comparable to the models on Fucked Hard 18. Young, some curvy, different races and nearly all are attractive. Which is something you'll also have trouble finding on handjob sites. So, that's part of my reasoning behind "the best".
Then there's the amount of content. There are handjob "networks" that don't have half the amount of content this site has. The oldest scene is from December 2005, so they've been around a long time even though they didn't update much back then...
Which does make me question the recycling possibility. But if they are recycling some old scenes, they are doing so in remastered 1080p.
The tagging system deserves its own section. Handjobs are fairly basic. But as the genre once grew into a popular one, it stopped being the common handjob. Things like Tit-fucking were added. Pussy Tease was added. Butt Tease was added. The out of control, breaking the rules, Oral option was added. The tags might not be 100% right, but they are pretty accurate. I think in a handjob genre, those little tagged niches are very important. It kind of reminds me of lesbian sites that tag every action in a scene, which is a great help. I get tired of watching videos looking for one certain action only to not see it.
And those combined reasons make it the best handjob site.
I think as porn viewers and users (same thing?) get more and more used to common cookie-cutter porn scenes, they'll start looking into handjobs, CFNM, since I'm pretty sure that's what happened to me.
The one part that might surprise potential members are the pictures. Again, the thought going into this content is very good. I really didn't think I would care anything about pictures from a handjob site, but at least 1/3 of the pictures (in downloadable zips) are just of the model before the handjob, teasing, in her regular clothes and that actually adds to the content.
Seeing that the vast majority of the content is available in 1080p helps for those into the technical aspects. The videos also have the 720p option and "web" and "mobile" versions. They also do have a "cumshot" option in the videos. This site, in and of itself is impressive.
I have very little to say about the other sites in the network. You might find something you like on them, but I didn't. The Chelci Fox one has some interesting content that does look fairly old (maybe 2005-2010 era?), but is typical solo girl-type content.
I also think this is a good example of a question that has been asked here on PU. The price does hurt the score. Based on the standards that are used in grading a site, it's very close to a 100, by itself, it does everything it says and they have evolved it with new situations and actions, but the price and inclusion in a network that's not very good, brings the score down a little. I'm doing math there and thinking if it wasn't sold as a network, the price would be cheaper for this one site.
If you're looking for handjob content this is really the only site you need to join. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn, this would be a good alternative to try. Most of the big name models I know of, are on here.
I went to cancel my membership to the Mano Job network and instead of taking me to a cancel screen it brought up a survey about my experience on their site. I don't really mind that since it was just basic questions like:
Would you recommend our site to your friends?
But it also asked which of their sites I had visited, said there are four sites included. I only knew of three. The four choices were:
Mano Jobs The Dick Suckers Mr. POV Chelci Fox
Never having heard of Chelci Fox, I went to chelcifox(dotcom) and tried to sign in as a member, as soon as clicked the "members login" button, my browser bounced a warning up that it was not a secure connection and could be a phishing attempt. I closed Firefox and tried it on Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer and Chrome and all three of those gave the same type of warning. Maybe it's just me, but this network already has questionable practices going on with the recycling of content, now another problem comes up. I'd still recommend Mano Job, but just be careful on there.
Hey Denner, as a longtime fan of Eve, I visited this site on a trial a few weeks ago. The content is from Eve's site and from her licensed content that appears on Twistys and a few other sites. I may be wrong, but my understanding according to the guys at her official site, she has retired. I'm guessing she got married. I had noticed that a lot of her newest material, she had a very large wedding ring on and several of her last sets were in a wedding dress and wedding lingerie. Her official site hasn't updated in over a month now, and that I know of, she hasn't had any new material surface on any sites, the newest I have seen is on Sweet Eva on the Teen Dreams Network, and she has lightened her hair color in it, still dark, but it has a light brown look to it now.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of content, upwards of 3,000 picture sets and 1,000 videos
- Many known pornstars before they were stars, many amateurs that I wish went on to a career in porn as well.
- Though quality on picture sets does vary, all sets are available in zips
- Exclusive content
- New site design from when I was a member a few months ago, download speeds have increased for me.
- Great TBP price of $14.95
Cons:
- Video quality could be improved, but I like this site for the exclusive pictures moreso than the videos.
- Picture quality could be better, but it is advertised as amateur site, so it isn't that bad.
- Not a lot of hardcore
- Older sets have a quality dropoff from new sets
Bottom Line:
Matt's Models reminds me a lot of the ATK sites. If you're here just for the videos, you probably won't like it as much. One of my favorite parts of the site is the "before they were stars" content. My original reason for joining was to get some really great older content of Eva Angelina, pre-implants, with glasses too. Just a few other recognizable models are Erica Campbell, Shay Laren and a personal favorite Addisson Rose.
Looking through the more amateur models that have yet to go pro, or for that matter, may never go pro, adds value to the site since some of these girls haven't been seen before. Cassandra Colegra is another favorite here, she has her own site now, but isn't as well known as most pro models.
Picture quality can throw you off some. I've downloaded different sets from different years and overall, I would call the resolution average just above average for the entire site. The newer sets are better, as expected. The videos I have downloaded are around 500 on the high end of the resolution scale, downloadable in full scenes, which is a plus over the aforementioned ATK sites.
Overall, this isn't a site that I would tell a new porn customer to check out. I get a lot out of this site, because they have plenty of material from some of my favorites, but it still isn't a site to introduce someone to online porn with. On the other hand, if you've never tried Matt's, I would give it a recommendation, especially with the $14.95 price. Recommended!
Haven't had time to join any new sites in a few weeks, but that changes this week. I've never been a member on Matt's Models, but did take the preview tour and see that he has some very early content, pre-implants w/glasses Eva Angelina content. I've read the different reviews and they do vary a great deal. Are there any other models on the site that are now much bigger stars? I always miss those if I'm not paying attention. For that price, I'd just about join it just for the Eva Angelina content.
They seem to have several DVDs from the Private studio, which is one of my favorite porn studios for Euro porn. They also have some Asian content that interests me like the Sporting DVDs. As a life long student of the martial arts, it would be interesting to see an Asian girl practicing her kata then having sex, even more so with part of her uniform still on. Oh the martial art skies just rumbled.
Do not be distracted. Do not lose focus. The good news for the skies is that I can't be distracted, the damn search engine doesn't work at all and when I go to sign up it won't let me read the terms of the site before transferring me to some billing service that I've never used.
I searched Eva Angelina, Aneta Keys and Simony Diamond, one at a time and received the exact same results for them. The search is split into four search categories, Title, Cast, Updates and Video #.
Video # seems to be some kind of UPC type code they use to number their videos. Now tell me, if I am on the page of the video that has the number on it, why in the hell would I need to search for it?
The page you get when you click "Sign Up" gives me a whopping 5 seconds to read the terms before redirecting me to their billing processor. They aren't trying to hide their 8 GB daily download limit, but it is still a pain when trying to read about a site that uses a biller that I had never heard of decides to redirect me. I kept clicking the back button and would read one line at a time. On this page that you get 5 seconds to read, there is the mention of the Daily Download Limit of 8 GB, there is a link to copy down so you can cancel as well.
The billing processor is Verotel Tickets Club. It is McAfee checked as of today, and I would guess everyday, but I know nothing about it.
The 8 GB limit isn't going to bother me that much. I would prefer it not be there, but that is still 240 GB per month, and I only have a few sites on my hard drive that I have half of that number from.
I wonder if paysites really understand how important the billing processor is to potential members? And please, fix the search engine. It is a DVD site, the one kind of site that a bad search engine can sink.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 46 Sites included in this big network
- If you like extreme hardcore, this is about as extreme as it gets.
- Some of the sites have up to 640 high end on their videos
- The sites with pictures do have zip downloads
- Good download speeds
Cons:
- Only found 4 of the sites to be interesting.
- Price is too high, there are other networks with similar content with better quality for lower prices
- Most of the sites were on the small side, I think they could easily group some of these together.
- Some of the sites videos are below 400 on high end, come on people, it is 2008, 640 just about has to be considered the happy medium
- Even the sites that had a theme that I was interested in, didn't really live up to that theme
Bottom Line:
This was one of those joins that I wasn't for sure about, but I saw where they had some Sativa Rose content and a few others that I like so I will take the one month plunge.
Most of these sites on this network just scream, "generic" content. They have several blowjob sites, and I will never understand why they need more than one site, just put them all on one. I am starting to think networks do this, not just to be able to advertise a higher number of sites than their competition, but also thinking that most people won't fool with visiting the 6 different blowjob sites.
The quality at best is average on the videos. Most of the sites best quality videos are 445 high end, a few do have 640 high end. Having picture zips is always a nice feature, but all of the sites don't have pictures and the pictures aren't high resolution.
The overly violent content will definitely make some not even consider, so let me add that while I have seen worse in porn, the violence level here is pretty high if you are offended easily. You get a lot of throat gagging.
I'm not really into the models who have pounds of make-up on, especially when their eye shadow ends up smeared from being choked.
Best sites, the POV ones are pretty good, Catfight Gangbang is pretty good, Hellfire Sex is pretty good if you are into goth looks and Tease it Out is pretty good. I didn't keep anything from the other sites. Overall, I can't recommend it unless you like extreme very hardcore sex.
Hey Denner, the video files I have from Teen Brazil look pretty good, the specs on the videos look better than the actual videos though. The properties on the video files I have say 720 high end 2000+ bitrate, which should be near perfect, but they aren't. I would rate the video quality maybe a 7 on a 10 scale, though the video content, the girls and action are really great. I still have every video that I downloaded from Teen Brazil, which is rare. I usually delete some or put them on DVDs, but I still have every episode on my hard drive. I remember liking the Mega Pass network, but it was mainly for the Brazil/Latina sites they have.
And thank you for the review. I try to keep up with the Brazilian sites, but the best ones are Mike in Brazil and it has a daily download limit, so it was nice to get some new Brazilian content that I hadn't seen. And I agree, it is always nice to see replies to reviews. Thanks for the reply.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 22 sites, my picks are Teen Brazil, College Fuck Fest, Bikini Banger, Border Banger and Yank My Crank
- Great humor in many of the clips, including a hilarious Speedy Gonzalez reference in Border Bangers, "Arriba, Andale!"
- Video quality is above 640 in most cases which is impressive for a network of 22 sites.
- I think it is mostly exclusive, I don't recognize the material
- Most of the sites update a few times per week
Cons:
- Humor in porn can be a bad thing at times.
- Very few pictures, and the ones that are there are poor quality.
- I'm not into anal, so several of the sites are of no use to me, also a tranny site that is of no use.
- Two of the best sites for me, Teen Brazil and Border Bangers need more content!
Bottom Line:
My love of Brazilian women pulled me to this site after seeing Apoctom's review of it. The Brazil Teen site was enough for me, but Border Bangers also had some good clips as did Bikini Banger, Yank My Crank and College Fuck Fest.
The network reminds me of Ox Pass. The humor in the sites was worth 3 points in my review, so if you don't like humor in your porn, knock off 3 points. I couldn't help but laugh when on a Boarder Banger video, the guy tells the girl, "This is how they came up with the idea of putting a burrito inside a taco" that is good humor. I will take the humor over spitting in the model's faces or grabbing their throats anyday.
I was happily surprised at the video quality for a network. I actually let my bill recur since I had been out of town the last week. I wanted to explore the other sites more in-depth. I downloaded all material in Brazil Teen and Border Bangers and will be keeping all of it, it has been nothing but quality in those videos.
I guess the lack of decent pictures is a knock. Also useless sites for me, but I don't knock much off for those since I know some people like anal sites. Overall, it is a very good network, I think they could lower the price a little, maybe $5 to $10 off. I would recommend it based just on the five sites I listed in pros, as the content I have gotten from those sites is above average quality. Plus, they do update which some networks rarely do. Definitely recommend for Brazilian fans!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model.
Cons:
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell.
Bottom Line:
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100.
This is all starting to be confusing after seeing Khan's post about them getting a higher price. Maybe it has something to do with my browser having been to Met-Art through a promo email a few days ago? The original link you posted was also giving me the $19.95 price. Ever since I joined Met-Art, in 2010 I think, for a full year subscription, they've sent me some really good deals.
I meant to reply to this, but had been on a mini-vacation. One thing I should have added, not for sure if this made any difference, I had a year membership to Met-Art last year. It ran out about 3 months ago, so I don't know if the offer was maybe offered to just those who had joined it long-term or not.
I happened to notice my regular Met Art email and clicked it figuring it would be the usual Met Art + Met Models offer, instead, it was Met Art + Nubiles.net for $29.95. Anybody else get this offer? I haven't been on either site in awhile, so I may have to take this offer.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My new favorite of the picture heavy sites, TBP price of $19.95 is a bargain, as is the year deal of $99.99.
- 4 updates per day
- There could be bigger, but the biggest resolution I'm seeing right now is 3744x5616, all sets are zipped.
- Amount of content is overwhelming, more than I have been able to go through in 3 months.
- After much thought, I consider the lack of many movies a pro. The movies they do have rarely compare to the photo sets.
- Movies are high quality technically and come in DIVX, QT H264, IPOD, WMV and MPEG.
- Navigation is pretty simple to use considering the amount of content.
- DL speed uses about 98% of my max speed
Cons:
- Movies to me are not worth downloading, and if they didn't post them, I wouldn't complain.
- Hard to believe, but some of the g/g sets to me take away from the solo sets.
- If you like anything that has to do with penetration, even solo, this isn't the site for you and wasn't for me a few years ago.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first reviewed Met-Art, I gave it an 80. I felt at that time, I was being nice with that score. If nothing else, the 80 was my way of saying at least everything is high quality and they update consistently.
Things have changed, I hadn't been a member in a year. I joined again and it was like a whole new world opened up to my perverted eyes. There still are sets that I find annoying, poses for example, but I'm finding much more to like now than I did two years ago.
The models range from typical slim models to average weight and bust. There aren't many Daisy DDDD cups here.
I think my change in how I look at this site came about when on a forum of a well-known Euro photographer, I read a post by him that said his sets when viewed told a story and that "some people don't get that story". I looked at Met-Art's sets that way and now will be joining for a year as soon as my monthly subscription runs out.
The resolution size of the pictures is huge. Those high 4000s images are almost like looking at a map! You scroll sideways or up and down and those are really amazing to look at in that much detail.
It probably didn't hurt that I developed myself a crush on Lidiya A and probably 30 other models. Including some of my longtime favorites like Zafira, Eve, Aneta.
My cons for this site are limited to things that I think could/would be cons to others. The videos are photoshoots or biographies/interviews. These are also quite large files. I downloaded one a few days ago that was 500 MB+, and it was nothing more than videoing the photoshoot. I also think the g/g sets are not near as good as the solo sets, though I haven't seen them all.
I am seeing more variety in their models than I had noticed in my earlier review and that helps me add the points to this re-review.
The search feature can be a hassle, at least for me, I'm not real specific in my searches, so I end up with hundreds of results, that is probably more my fault, but I don't know any of the set filenames, so how would I know what to search for using that function? In time, I would guess the search will be more functional for me as I get used to the site and its filenaming.
The locations are usually only second to the models in beauty also. I did run into a few blurry pictures here and there, but I'm not really complaining.
I had thought about sending their webmaster an email to ask a question, but haven't yet, so I don't know how their customer service is. To give an example of how much content there is, my question was going to ask who the model is in the thumbnail over "Your Profile", she is brunette, white lacy top opened to the middle and looks to be a matching skirt. I thought it was Zafira, but it isn't. So, I'm stuck looking through every model's page at the covers, hoping to find out who she is.
To me, that is a credit to how large the site is and how much content they have, add the very high quality and I have a new favorite photo site, recommended!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
