The DVD videos on videobox do vary. I just downloaded some earlier today. Here is one to check out to see the 720x480. Title of DVD is BJ Babes. Those are 720. I do believe the difference between 640 and 720 high end has to do with whether shot in widescreen format or normal format.
I am a pretty regular member at VB, probably 3-4 months out of every year, but on my current subscription there, I am having a lot of trouble with downloads.
Probably half of my downloads stop halfway through downloading and the error, "Could not read source file, contact administrator" comes up. So, I have to refresh the download and start over. I'm not for sure if they are limiting connections as I usually have 6-8 going at a time. Which I wouldn't mind if they are limiting connections, but would like to know in advance so I don't waste time downloading too many at a time, only to have to start over.
Oh and everything else is going fine on VB. They are starting to get more and more of the "tier A" studio DVDs.
I said yes, my wife is Latina, she isn't bringing big boobs to the table, but she has the hips and butt.
Denner, I saw David Allen Coe back several years ago at Billy Bob's in Texas. He was there with Kid Rock, as surprising as that might sound. Love DAC's old stuff.
I had to go with "other". See, I'm getting older and now I find the whole key isn't any of those things listed. But instead, just "time" should have been one of the answers! I'll get there eventually!
One thing to remember hondaman, the reviewers that "ding" Met-Art for no hardcore, are saving people money that are only interested in hardcore. You mention that it isn't relevant, but it is to someone who has never been on the site that would be reading reviews. Interesting discussion here in the other posts. If I could humbly offer you some advice hondaman, don't mention other sites in a review and say they aren't as good. It will make some of the members question if you are trying to promote the site you are reviewing over the competition.
Otherwise, very good and thorough review for the first time.
I've done just about all of those. They still haven't gotten me with the checked boxes. I marked forgot to go back. This has happened several times when joining what I would call a "newer" or "smaller" site. I remember them about 7 hours before the subscription runs out. Sadly for me, it happened the latest time with a very big site that is expensive, 1byday. I have a couple of DDF months each year where I join Hot Legs and Feet, 1byday and one of the other DDF sites. I had forgotten that I did join 1byday, I had thought about replacing it this time with Hands on Hardcore, since I hadn't been on it in awhile. I ended up forgetting that I had joined 1byday until 3 days before the subscription ran out.
Even worse, they got me with the time zone crap. I had gotten those DDF sites on the same day that I got an Xisty account, minutes apart, and the 1byday, HL&F accounts ran out that morning, the Xisty account didn't run out until that night. Which I really think is an issue that needs to be brought up to the pay processors because they are ripping us off a day. I know, its not much, but sure enough, the very next due update on 1byday was the Zuzanna Z redhair machine set, so I'm stuck with going back and joining again, mainly for that set.
I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.
If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.
I couldn't agree more. I always considered myself a video guy, but that was before finding Eve's solo site, while her videos are some of the best solo on the internet, her picture sets back in 2006 were and still are some of the best I've seen. May have more to do with her than anything else, but even now, I find myself joining sites because I like the color/lighting they use in their picture sets. Xisty comes to mind in their exclusive sets. Speaking of, they have 3 new Eve sets, so maybe she hasn't retired or gone away and was only taking a vacation. Babelicious also has a new set coming just in time for my birthday!
I've developed a new system. I go to freeones or one of the TGP sites and try to find samples of my favorite models from the site that I am considering joining. I won't post the the link, but Tiava's TGP is really good for doing a search by model's name and you can even search the site's name to find the samples the site has on there. I've found these samples, usually dozens of them per site, to be better than the samples the sites have in their preview.
As far as the content goes, I usually look at the picture samples to see the "style" of colors they use. Getting picky, I know, but I really prefer the warm color sets.
Hey Drooler, I haven't seen any on there that are 1280. I still can't tell the exact dimensions of the newest ones that I have, which would be from summer, but looks to be in the 650 range and are mp4 files instead of .avi
Makes me wonder about the pictures, that poll has been there since July. The sad thing is, because more members are into the videos, they will focus more on the videos than the pictures. Though, I am usually 50/50 on pictures/videos. I have always loved the color and lighting in the 21st Sextury pictures. I will probably join again next month since I've all but ran out of sites to join.
I like bangbros better, they seem to focus more on butts than boobs. Though it is repetitive as well. I do like their site Ball Honeys that comes with the network though.
Hey Drooler, yeah, I usually do try to get the sites that use ccbill or paycom or even VXS, but to get the special deal at Brazzers for $10 a month, I take it you can only sign up directly through them. There wasn't any mention of a payment processor on the welcome email. It is similar to how Karups PC is with a link to go to.
What I thought was funniest though, I'm sitting there answering their poor attempts at making me want to stay, "Make the worst decision in your life" I wanted to believe it was humor, but I really felt like they were trying to play some kind of emotional/mental game like the one that said "I would rather download poor quality content for more money". Kind of like those pop-up ads that say, "Click ok if you want to close, and receive a lifetime membership to gay sites". I mean, what if the person reading that ad is gay? They are clicking ok over and over! Figures, now that the dollar's value is going back up, gas prices are dropping, porn is dropping off too.
On my most recent subscription to Brazzers, just now canceled, I did not think I was ever going to get the damn thing to cancel. First, the newer content isn't a step up. The sites have become incredibly repitive. The video quality isn't much better either. But, what I mainly wanted to tell is to be careful when trying to cancel. This is possibly the worst cancel system I have seen. Don't get me wrong, I like these guys and their discounts, but here is what I went through. Clicked, "Cancel" link in original email from site. This takes me to their site, where I sign in. I sign in, it makes me an offer to stay for a 1 time charge, 6 months for $48 and some change. I clicked "No" but wait, offer 2 stay for 1 month for $14.95 per month. Eh, I joined it for $10 a month! The option says, "Yes I want this great deal" or "No, I want to continue downloading second rate content elsewhere". I clicked no. Wait, a 3rd offer! This time $8 and some change per month, my option besides yes is "No, I want to make the worst decision of my life". Yeah you didn't know my first wife! But seriously, this is where it could catch people off guard. Once you go through all of these screens, it says they retreived your information. And NOW you have to click cancel AGAIN. If you don't the membership continues, that is 5 clicks on cancel or "no" when they ask if you want a special offer. That's a little much to go through, in my opinion.
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
If you like oral, facials and beautiful women, nearly all of them are top level in looks, you will love this site. I'm surprised it hasn't had more coverage here!
I had this happen to me on Eve Angel's site last year. The payment processor said that there is only a certain amount of months they can recur your account, without opening a new account. I don't know if this is some kind of new rule or maybe it could even depend on who you have your card with, they could be stopping it after so many months since there are so many scams these days that charge a person's card every month without them even noticing. The limit on mine was 12 months, after that, I had to go back and re-register. So, I wouldn't count on it being VB's fault. I know there has been a scam going where a place calls and says you have won X amount of free gas, to confirm your birthday, by pressing it in and somehow, they then have you "confirmed" into a coupon club that costs $15 a month. Then again, you aren't likely to get an answer from VB, I've sent them a dozen or so support mails over the years and never received a reply.
Which site did you join through? I have been a member two times, joining through tasty pass, not any of the individual sites, and I have larger resolution videos. The tasty pass sign up page doesn't even give a trial option. I'm wondering if they are using lower quality videos for the trial? I have around 42 videos from the Tasty Tara site and all are at least 740 high end, some are even approaching 900 high end. The videos I have from Tasty Julie are a minimum 640 high end. I'm mainly asking if it is possible that they aren't letting trial members have the full size videos. My main interest in the site is Tasty Tara, and I found the quality of content on her site to be well above average.
Hey Cybertoad, now that is a great review! I haven't seen this site, I do know of Catalina, but didn't know she had her own site until you mentioned it and I also see that Jessica Jaymes is on that network, and I have always liked her. Not to mention Sienna. I will check this out, I'm always looking for a new site or network to join.
I just noticed this review after you mentioning for me to comment on your reviews. Does the site have zips for pictures? That is a big selling point. How big are the pictures, the resolution? What resolution and bitrate are the videos? When you mention the older videos are not as good, you say the format isn't as good. What format are they? Is it the resolution or bitrate or both that is bad on the old videos?
Most of all though, you say this isn't the best site of this network, which is the Brazzers network, but in your reviews, it is the highest rated by you, which site from the network is better?
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
