I noticed Rusty's comment and meant to comment on it. The first thing, considering 21 Sextury has around 10,000 scenes with an average of 3 different formats, that's 30,000 files total. As with anything in electronics there has to be a rate of failure. I can say that I downloaded 1,572 (1.2 TB) scenes from 21 Sextury and have no corrupt files. What I was going to tell Rusty is to check DownThemAll. I was using it on Eve Angel Official, my last comment on it even talked about it, I had a whole section of corrupted/broken video files. When I went back and downloaded them through my browser, not through DownThemAll, I only had one corrupt file. In that case, I downloaded the MOV file instead of the WMV and it was uncorrupted. I don't know how or if we can punish a site for one of the files being corrupted when they have other formats of the same file that work. Also can't fairly say 21 Sextury is the problem when DownThemAll has been updated 3 times in the last month, showing some obvious bugs in it.
Like I have before, if the problem starts showing up for me, I will go back and reduce the score, post a comment explaining the reduction, but even if I got one corrupted file, I have 1,572 that aren't. Even if I had 15 corrupted ones that's still less than 1% so it's hard to gauge exactly how I would go about lowering a score for an error that happens less than 1% of the time. And on the other side, if you notice on Rusty's comment, the 21 Sextury staff had replied and were working on finding out the problem. Which as we both know is much more than we can say for most sites.
The pricing isn't too confusing these days. Seems like used to they started you out at $30 then it decreased by each month. This one, you reach the low point of pricing in the 3rd month, just a simple $19.95 first month, $14.95 second month, $9.95 third month, then you stay at $9.95 each month from there on out. Once you get to that $9.95 a month for 600 new updates, I think that's when the value of the site really shines.
You've always been the odd man out Messmer! There is a big difference, I do collect certain models. I think with my OCDC, if I just picked scenes here and there without any structure, it would drive me crazy, then I'd be the crazy man out! Agree about Aletta Ocean's implants. While I'm not against implants, especially in the case of models like Sandra Shine, Zafira, where they were realistic with their implants. I think Sandra was a 34C before implants but was sagging in her early 20s, she got implants that she says made her a 36C, what she calls "full" and said some bras are 36D. With Zafira, it was a case of her noticing from all the nude modeling she has done, one of her breasts was larger than the other. So she took the size of the bigger one and had both balanced out. I can understand those situations, but not in Aletta's case. Also, another that went way overboard is Black Angelica. I thought she had near perfect boobs before her implants, very similar to Eve Angel's, then Angelica goes and gets DD.
And there's that difference in us in the mature section of models. I should mention that I saw some really attractive Asian mature models on the Idols 69 network, but a lot had the mosaic on them. A few of those were in their 50s and I found them attractive. Once I near 60s, that's my mom's age and that's too far for me. And I like glam, similar to my next highest scoring site being Twistys and I remember you didn't like it that well.
Did you ever look at FTV? They have the glam thing too, but they do have a lot of amateur models. I had mentioned in the forum that I've been on an exhibitionism kick lately, they do that a lot, which is probably as far from glam as one can get since there is no studio, often spontaneous, though it can get boring at times since you sometimes watch a 10 minute video to see a handful of nudity flashes. It does have the girl next door feel though.
Before the split, if I remember correctly, one of the DP sites wasn't included with 21 Sextury, believe it was DP Fanatics that was a loyalty site. While I'm not a huge fan of DPs, I am a huge fan of Simony Diamond and they had quite a bit of her content on it. I was however a fan of Zoliboy, not his new stuff, but those first 2 years of content on his site has a lot of rare rough/extreme content of some of the more glam models. My closest review I could compare to was of Club Sandy in summer 2010 since it had became a network at that point and the score was 94. With the 21 Sextury network the same content of the old Club Sandy network plus about 10 other sites and better navigation. Once I figured out the navigation on this network and how to use the filters, it made the network almost perfect for me. I wish other networks would consider putting a search with filters like this one.
I'm not a fan of the gynecological shots either. One of the things I should have mentioned in my earlier reply, I also reviewed both Pix and Video and Club Sandy in the low 90s in 2007 on here. So they've consistently been high scorers for me. Those two sites in particular were standalone sites in 2007, but I used to join with the two combined for $45 a month because those two have a nice blend of glam/softcore/midcore/hardcore. I really think those three teen sites they have add a lot. I'm usually not into the teenish models, since I like the mid-20s to mid-30s, more elegant looking models, but the three teen sites, Cuties Galore, Anal Teen Angels and Lez Cuties are very similar to say Nubiles. I will post on Cap'n's thread in the forum about networks with a few other strengths this network has.
I rated mine very fast because the shithead cable company I have internet service through keeps giving us "free" speed upgrades while instituting monthly download limits/data transfer. My downloads average between 2 and 3 mb/s. Fast enough to have downloaded exactly 1.2 TB of content in January 2011. It seemed to shock the cable techs as much as make them mad. The older tech asked "where in the hell you putting it all at?" He was under the impression that external hard drives were 500 GB at most.
That's the good thing with this network. Pix and Video, Club Sandy and Footsie Babes are more softcore than hardcore. I think one way to see how highly I've thought of these sites is to look at the old individual reviews I did of them. Pix and Video a 92 in July 2009 and Club Sandy a 94 in July 2010. Those are just 2 of the 37 sites. Even looking at the PU average scores on the sites by themselves gives a good view. Asshole Fever 87.2 Lez Cuties 85.2 Nude Fight Club 80.6 Anal Teen Angels 88.7 Gapeland 91.5 Footsie Babes 84.5 DP Fanatics 96.0 Cuties Galore 83.0
The Pix and Video PU score suffers from being reviewed during the time period when they were having their server issues. I was even surprised by the TBP review since TBP only scores the network an 89, but also scores Pix and Video, by itself, an 88.5. That's why I think a network like this one is hard to review since it's hard to determine how to balance all these sites and scores out. To me, having 10 sites that I would rate 85 or up all included in one package is the most I could ask for.
Oh and yeah, I've been a member many times in the past, just not through the network. Some of my first reviews here on PU were of Club Sandy and Pix and Video, which were $30 a month each back then. With so many updates though, they keep me coming back.
Didn't have room for video quality breakdown and these may not be completely right since I don't have time to scan through the exact dates. Starting in 2006 the videos all jumped to DVD quality or higher. In 2008 they were all the way over to HD quality. In 2010, all the way to Blu Ray quality.
Couldn't squeeze this into the review. A partial list of the big names Eve has had in girl/girl scenes with her on this site.
- Sandra Shine, Aria Giovanni, Simony Diamond, Blue Angel, Sophie Moone, the "retired" Mia Stone, Liza del Sierra being dominated, Jeny Baby being dominated, Melanie Memphis, Debbie White, Bambi, Zafira, Melanie Ria, Cherry Jul (old set remastered to HD), Angelica Heart and one of the most underrated models Aleksha Diamond has multiple sets with Eve on here.
Also nice blend of outdoor scenes in recent months including two with motorcycles and one with a tricked out lowrider bicycle. Could even say the site could fall under fetish site since more and more involve uniforms, one she starts as a carpenter and masturbates with her tool belt still on. It definitely keeps everything fresh and different.
Pacino is known for bringing in a lot of amateur Latina models, mostly or all, based out of South America. While my membership is running out to his Pacino's Adventures site, I happened to notice a new site added to his family sites. This Natalia Spice is quite incredible! I've not joined it yet, but probably am going to. From the join page it does show Tania Spice's solo site as one of the bonus sites. It had been a standalone site there for awhile, so that's a bonus if you're a fan of Tania and wanted her content away from Pacino's Adventures. I'm curious to see how much content of Natalia there is since I'm not familiar with her and she looks to have a near perfect, all-natural Latina body and the previews confirm g/g sets, masturbation, so if not this month, I'll join it next month. Kind of reminds me of Sativa Rose from her earlier days. Though it's unlikely, anybody tried it yet?
You may be misunderstanding the review. It says exclusive content. Which means you've probably seen the models on other sites, but the scenes and shoots they have on this site can only be seen on this site. Notice in Maggie's review exclusive notes, "Yes, these are original scenes that were new to me."
I see that the others answered your question. It's definitely just people who have the same Internet Provider I have. It's a pretty big American cable company. It turned into more of a joking situation with cable tech guy who called. He said that once a person went over 1 TB of data transferred in a month they had been looking into the usage to make sure this large amount downloaded/uploaded wasn't pirated mainstream movies/music/file sharing. The irony of it all, the cable company had just given all high speed internet users a boost in speed up to 30M and I'm downloading at 2000-2500 kb/s. I seriously doubt I'll hit that limit again and don't really know if that limit is going to be imposed or if they're just using it to try and catch pirates. Once I told him I had legally purchased porn, he laughed about it and said he understood and "would make a note of the activity being legal".
One, I don't really have any complaints with the new format of the 21 Sextury network except that they helped me find out I have a 1 TB download limit with my ISP in a month! There are still some glitches here and there. I haven't ran into movies not playing. The movies are working fine, but I have clicked on maybe ten or so photo sets that say, "Media files uploading try again later" or something like that and some of those are more than a few years old so I have trouble believing those are still uploading.
Note to the webmasters if looking for these, found 3 that did it in the Anetta Keys photo sets. One set I believe is a duplicate where the video was remastered with Sophie and Sandy, believe it is "Ice Cream Girls" or something ice cream.
Also wanted to comment on the "backstage" video sets. As unlikely as I thought it would be that I would say this, I'm going to, I have found some of these pretty good. It seems to all depend on the model and based on that, you have to have a feel for the model's personality before knowing which would be good in backstage videos. Regina Ice's personality really shows in the backstage sets. I would say the different backstage sets I've seen of her have lifted her into my top 10 favorite models. Seems like a really fun, playful woman. Of course, some of the backstage videos are just boring, but I'm not going to overlook those anymore.
Also like with my other comment on a site very similar to this one, I'm glad to see that 21 Sextury is still bringing in new models, a few I've discovered during this membership, Lioness, Daysie, Willa (may be late to the party on her) and with the separation of the more extreme niches, it's all but guaranteed that I'll be staying around at least for 3-4 months just to check out all the bonus sites. Sure beats the days of paying $45 for just Club Sandy and Pix and Video. And lastly, as I had mentioned in my Nude Fight Club review it's very rare that you'll see a network like this one that has a model index that works. This one, to the best of what I can see does work and is accurate. Clicking on a model and seeing 100+ scenes from 6 different sites in a network is pretty impressive.
To say that I've been disappointed with most sites these days would be an understatement. I wasn't really for sure if I was just running out of interest in most porn or if most porn just wasn't very interesting. So, I decided to take a trial of my all-time favorite site Twistys since it had been about 7 months since I was last a member. The first thing I noticed is the new, at least to me, way to download picture zips. You hover your mouse pointer over the zip icon and the different size options pop up. Just from first glance it looks like fall 2009 was when the "large" photos became available on picture sets which is a lot considering 3 photo sets a day. These large zips have 2000x3000 resolution pictures in them and I think that's more than acceptable. Even the "medium" zips are 1000x1600 resolution which is adequate and those look to date back into 2006 on some sets.
Not really for sure about the trial, similar to wittyguy's comment, maybe there are different trials, but the one I signed up with through PU directly to Twistys was $1 for 2 days. It lets me download the picture sets, but if I click a set to view in browser it says I need to upgrade to a full membership. I also cannot download movies in this trial. Anything that requires a click is bouncing me to the upgrade to full membership page.
That's not a complaint at all. The trial still lets you see everything that has been updated for every model AND download the picture sets. I can't see anyone complaining about that for $1.
Also want to say that if Twistys does one thing better than any site it is the quality of models, especially newer models. Having said that, they at least have confirmed it's not me losing my interest in porn just that most sites aren't delivering porn that interests me. You could maybe see this as a slight warning to those looking for a full trial for the $1 price. Also continuing in my praise of Twistys for not bailing out on us longtime fans. Once this month runs out, I like joining at the first of the month to make sure I get all the new Treats content for the month, I'll be back to a full membership.
Partial mistake on my part and I apologize. Hadn't watched the Melanie Memphis/Frank Gunn video or looked at the pictures. Eve has 5-6 photos in it and it is some kind of story that I don't understand. Frank is at Eve's house, so is Melanie, kind of take it Frank is supposed to be Eve's boyfriend, she leaves for work or shopping and Melanie has sex with him. So that at least explains why there is a Melanie Memphis boy/girl set on Eve's site...I think and yesterday's update now has the video. Still nothing on the 1-18-2011 video or the reasoning behind the 1280x720 links.
I was going to re-review this site today, but the review kept reading more like a rant or comment than a review. The good, it's still Eve and she's still going strong. I have yet to see a model that can pull my attention to her just with her eyes like Eve can. I do think that's what makes her one of, if not the best solo models.
Now for the problems. They will fix it in a day or two, but today's update 3-8-2011 does not have the video with it. It's only showing pictures, this isn't a rare glitch. I've been a member of this site for 9 months off and on since it opened and it's fairly common for the new updates not to have a video on the day it updates. It's so common, if you go look at the preview update for 1-18-2011, you'll see by enlarging the preview that it says "1080p Full HD" but there still is NO video with it and that was 6-7 weeks ago.
Continuing on that as a good example, a few months ago, a Melanie Memphis with Frank Gunn scene somehow ended up on Eve's site, no Eve in it. I thought maybe it was intentional since a lot of solo sites show scenes of other models as "friends" and while I would be okay with that, not happy, but okay with it.
Now to go against my previous comment. It's true that this site is re-releasing the old content of Eve from Eve's old site. I know this because I have every video from that old site. Because I've already viewed those many times, I hadn't been watching the new re-release versions. I decided to watch one and the re-releases are not HD as the link says. The link you click says 1280x720 at 4000 bitrate, but the videos are only 702x528 with 2500 bitrate. It is an improvement over the old ones that were 640x480 with 1500 bitrates, but it's not HD.
I do understand that there are limits to how much something (video/audio) can be improved based on the source content, but the link shouldn't say 1280x720, maybe just put "high quality".
When you add the no video with new updates until a day or so later, the Melanie Memphis/Frank Gunn set landing on Eve's site, the links that say 1280x720, but aren't when you download them, it makes the site frustrating.
Using the tags on the site, I have been downloading by "solo" and "lesbian" this way I can put them in separate folders. According to the tags there are 121 solo sets and 76 lesbian sets. There are 2 boy/girl sets, so the total sets should be 199. Instead, a full count shows 257. So there are 60ish sets tagged wrongly since solo or lesbian should be in every video. Frustrating.
In ending, if this were a multi-site network with 80-100 updates per month, I could maybe understand some technical problems. But it's not. It's a site that updates 3 times per week. The cost amounts to paying $25 a month for 12 updates. It would seem to me that the least DDF's staff could do is make sure everything is tagged and updated. It's starting to look like just pure laziness.
When you go to the Daily Sex Dose site scroll down to where it has the featured updates, click on the name "Daily Sex Dose", believe the newest update is Eve Smile and Brandy Smile, set title "All Smiles", but don't click the photo or title, instead the site name. This will take you into the Daily Sex Dose updates. It looks promising, but my only question is how many of these updates are really new updates? I don't recognize all of the models and I only collect a few of them. With that being said, there is a set of Eve Angel on Daily Sex Dose that looks familiar to me listed as the 1-6-11 update. It could just be that Eve has an outfit on she has worn before and be a different scene and I just recognize the outfit. I think I'm going the network just because there are some models here with multiple sets that I'm not familiar with like Lana S.
I wasn't too happy with my first glance at the new Videobox called VB3. After a few test runs on it, I actually like the new search engine in VB3 better than the one in the old version of VB.
The big difference you will notice in the search engine is that the old search engine had roughly 40 niche categories, where as the new VB3 search engine has 112. Just off of basic searches, clicking a niche, I've found quite a few DVDs I hadn't seen on VB before. Also, if you're taking it for a test run be sure to sign in. For whatever reason, if you're signed into the old version then click to go to VB3, it doesn't automatically sign you in. Once signed in, most of the clutter is reduced.
Where things get confusing is when you look at the top of the VB3 page, over to your right, a "channels" button. When you click this, you expect to see Evil Angel and Vivid, which I have subscriptions to both, but now there's two more channels.
Those two new channels are Kink.com and RealityKings.com, both of these are in my favorite site groups so I'm of course going to click on them. The Reality Kings one only has 90 some scenes and the Kink one only has 70 some scenes. Now the confusion really comes in. You can stream 4 videos from these sites, called previews, but it looks to be full scene streams. There also is a choice to download the scenes.
When I click download scene, a box pops up that asks if I want to subscribe to the channel. The Kink channel says they add 4 HD scenes per week. The Reality Kings channel says they add 1 new scene per day. It says my amount due to subscribe is $0 so I click subscribe and I receive a server error message. Most likely since my subscription has been canceled.
So, I'm wondering if anyone knows the prices that these are going to be to subscribe to? I'm not for sure the Reality Kings one interests me that much since I join it every 3 months anyway and RK is a network so I could get all these scenes with a Reality Kings subscription. On the other hand, Kink isn't a network and requires you to join multiple sites to see the different niches they have, so that one would have some interest from me.
I did a test join using another browser and neither are offered in the sign-up process like Vivid and Evil Angel are, so I'm guessing those are add-ons for members only. Anyone that has joined the Kink channel? I would like to see what the price is going to be.
I like all those listed and would mention Pam Spice as well from Pacino's. Still, I have to say my all-time favorite Latina is Jessica from Pacino's Adventures. One of the closest to perfection classic feminine bodies I've ever seen, but she only has 3 sets on Pacino's, none on any other sites. I remember reading somewhere she's a professional cheerleader or dancer now.
Here are a few that I've only seen lately, mostly on VB or Reality Kings.
Bella on VB. Not really for sure of much about her. See scene "Teen Brazil 5 Scene 4" on VB.
Elena Heiress on VB, not for sure she's still a teen, but one of the videos I have of her is "Amateur Rookie Search 4, Scene 1".
What I do is go on VB find the Brazilian series' like "Smoking Hot Latinas". Oh and that little Isabella on Pacino's is another good one.
From how I read the question, it would be like when we question the validity of a scene. Take Bang Bus' content for example. When they used to have comments on their site for each scene, nearly each one had probably 1/10 of the comments saying, "This shit is fake. You all didn't just happen to be driving around and find a hot chick who would have sex with you in the back of a bus." While the scenes were pre-planned, it was still a hot, naked woman having sex in a bus/van filled with windows, driving through traffic.
I tend to bounce back and forth from focusing more on photos than videos, then the next month will be focused more on videos. I also have mixed feelings about the photo set sizes. I'll see some small sets without any nearly same poses, but think I would like to see a little more. Then I'll see a set with 300 pictures with half of them being nearly identical poses as the other half. A few of the photo sets on ATK Exotics were around the 100 MB size, but most were 15-40 MB. I've downloaded photo sets from one site as big as 1.2 GB.
My really big problem with photo sets is the skip of the tease that you can see in the videos. The perv in me likes those photos where the model's panties are pulled over just slightly enough to sneak a peek, but more and more these days go from standing in thong to laying nude without any of the middle parts included.
Yeah, back to the old the models are good enough to make up for the lack of technical quality. Now, some of those newer videos, like Emy Reyes, those are I think 640-720 high end res and look pretty good, not HD, but they aren't terrible and they're in full scenes. The ones that frustrated me was Wendy, who is one of my favorites on ATK Exotics and some of her movies are split into parts. It wouldn't be so bad, but she's one of the models feature on the front member page. Still, I was in a photo mood and the full zips made up for it.
Funny coincidence, right after saying I wasn't familiar with the dime piece category, I heard a guy say, "She's a dime piece, a fine piece of female specimen". Jess is one of my favorites as well, also Emy Reyes earns the dime piece. I do like the originality of using dime piece, but I found searching through the dime pieces to be a subjective mess.
I thought the Emy collection was enough to pay for the monthly price. The photo sets they have of her are the best photos I've seen of her. In the Crack has some really good content of her as well. Especially if you haven't seen her glammed up.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
