| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Dirty Flix
(0)
|
Reply of
PhilPhil's Comment
PhilPhil,
I'm just curious why you're pointing out that porn sites, in a time when STDs are at the highest, are using condoms? I don't like them in porn but it doesn't seem like something that's that big of a deal. Even more so, did you ever think the sites aren't trying to hide the condoms but instead know the importance of them for the health of the models and are trying to make them less noticeable? I don't get the witch hunt you have going on here.
|
10-25-19 10:54pm
|
Reply
677
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
CowboyDave's Comment
The best tip I can give you is to go into your browser's cookies and remove any Adult Time cookies when you go back to join again and use a different email address. The cheapest ways I've seen to join it is to join through Burning Angel, they almost always have a $9.95 promo and it gives full access to Adult Time. I have done it that way 3 times.
|
10-25-19 10:50pm
|
Reply
678
|
Japan HD.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I personally thought it was a little too wordy.
|
09-18-19 06:39pm
|
Reply
679
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Eraroten's Reply
You know what? You're right. I never watch porn on my phone and never even thought to try it. I signed in on my iPhone and the old videos will play on it. I'm going to edit this into my review and add a few points to the score. It's still of no use to me since I'm not going to download porn on my phone then have to transfer it to my PC, but the content is there on mobile.
Here's the next question. Have you tried downloading it to your phone? I just used the streaming feature on the one I tried. I'm wondering if those files are just the very small resolution ones and that's why they don't have them on PCs/laptops. Good catch. And with you being able to on Android and I can confirm on iPhone.
|
09-16-19 12:58pm
|
Reply
680
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Messmer,
In my reply to you that "talked out of believing Bang Bros was behind Videosz".
I also said, "Do you know who the biller was? I only ask because RearAdmiral and I had trouble with echst.net."
Videosz still has nothing to do with Bang Brothers. Neither does the site Bang.com
It's the biller that is doing it and if you look up echst.net you will see they bill for all the Met-Art sites. They do not bill for Bang Bros.
I'm not trying to be hard on you, but I clearly told you about the problems Rear Admiral and I both had with echst.net. They are doing the same thing to you they did to us.
Bang Bros is known for forcing upsells during a membership not charging after you cancel. There are threads in the forum about the problems both Rear Admiral and I had with echst.net
|
09-12-19 02:45pm
|
Reply
681
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
No vote from me. Neither of these models are remotely close to being in the top model of the last 20 or 30 years conversation.
To put it in perspective:
Lana is currently the 396th ranked model in the world.
Aria Giovanni, 41 years old and rarely active is 77th, with nearly 20 years of content behind her.
Eve Angel, 36 years old, retired for 6 years, the only model ever with three separate solo sites dedicated to her is STILL 302nd, also ahead of Lana.
I'm not so much criticizing as I'm saying this hasn't looked like a "best model of the last 20-30 years contest". Maybe if it was the "Who's the hottest model of the last 5 years"
|
08-18-19 12:49am
|
Reply
682
|
Immoral Live
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think, I'm not positive on this, that Porno Dan used to be a very active member here on PU in the forum. My memory recalls the old version of "Blowpass", can't remember the old name, it was something generic sounding, being one of the sites that let PU have a huge discount (under $5) to get more reviews for their site.
Porno Dan makes me want to cheer him on. He reminds me of that guy that gave up his office job to become a porn star and producer.
|
08-07-19 11:38pm
|
Reply
683
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Your response is a lot like mine except I added a few extra words. My membership had just recurred for the 3rd month. I hadn't downloaded anything from Net Video Girls and was going to focus on it this month. I notice their usual very responsive webmaster is choosing not to respond.
I seriously hope my very positive review of Exploited College Girls didn't help them make the decision to split the "network" up.
|
08-07-19 11:34pm
|
Reply
684
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
I think Lana is a cute, pretty model but can't see how she could win.
Jenna, on the other hand, is one of the few porn models known by her first name and nothing else is required.
|
08-02-19 12:27pm
|
Reply
685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Going with Riley and her personality and attitude.
|
08-02-19 12:24pm
|
Reply
686
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
MrBison's Review
Mr. Bison, this is quoted from your review, "they’ve built up a large collection of videos and accompanying photosets. It’s hard/impossible to count, but exotics4me’s review suggests that they have around 1000 videos – that seems like a conservative guess to me"
I put in the pros of my review "Close to 1,000 videos" later in my review, I said, "Videos are 965 in count". Does that sound like a guess? You also said it's impossible to count. Any member would know the videos are easy to count. As of today, they have 25 full pages of videos with 40 videos per page. The 26th page has 12 videos on it. A little simple math tells us that 40x25 is 1,000 + 12 = 1,012. Not only was it not a guess, it wasn't conservative either. The photos are impossible to count. And saying someone is guessing might just take away their credibility, right?
I even explained in the review, "open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages."
Your critical attempt towards my review made me look at your review a little more. You say you are a current member. You list frequent and regular updates as a pro? You sure about that, current member? They have had 1 photo update and 1 video update in the last 20 days.
Another problem in your review you say the videos have an accompanying photo set, that is not true. Some of them do and now that you can see my video number was not off, there are over 2,000 photosets, 1,012 videos, there's at least 1,000 photosets not accompanying videos.
You also called it a rather high membership. X-Art is regularly available for $19.95. You didn't complain about Ersties $35 a month price? That's an interesting coincidence since this X-Art review naming me as taking guesses, just happens to be your first review since my extremely generous review of a 75 to Ersties.
Reading over your review doesn't even sound like you were a member. Especially if you compare it to your in-depth Ersties review.
Real wisdom to learn: Do not bark up a tree unless you can see the top of it. You never know what shit might fall down on your head.
You instigated the minute you criticized my review or name. Now your review has been criticized. Let's see your spin on that frequent, regular update schedule being 1 out of 20 days. Or how come the videos are hard to count when they have numbered pages?
|
07-19-19 08:18am
|
Reply
687
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
If not for the pictures I would not like Sex Art as much as I do. You would probably like the network, Finishes the Job.
|
07-17-19 04:50am
|
Reply
688
|
The Female Orgasm
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Hey RB,
I was just looking at this site a few days ago and had the same problem. If you remove the tour and the dot from the url, it loads it properly and has the discounted $19.95 price.
|
07-14-19 02:56pm
|
Reply
689
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Hey M, good to see you around.
As hard as it is to believe Bang and Bang Bros are in no way related. Bang is a newer massive DVD site like Videosz. Bang and Videosz are owned by the same company.
Do you know who the biller was? I only ask because RearAdmiral and I had trouble with echst.net. They were billing for Bang last year and I wondered if Videosz is using them. Either way, their owners SCTR are a good company by porn standards.
|
07-10-19 04:58pm
|
Reply
690
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
This is one of those situations where I wish the angry webmaster showed up and offered a refund! I think after this past week with it, I would probably lower the score to a 70. I was very positive and up about the photos. Most look to be self-shot which I like but a lot of the sets only have 8-12 photos in them. It's hard to view all the photos in a set too. They have a strange "rose" icon you can give to a photo so it has to not only load the photos but also the number of roses it has received. It looks like they were going for more fluff than substance.
|
07-06-19 09:26pm
|
Reply
691
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
The sad part is after another week with it, I'm starting to think I shouldn't have gave the extra 5 points. I spent a lot of time going through a model list of models I had never heard of and realized most weren't worth the time of downloading.
|
07-06-19 09:22pm
|
Reply
692
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
On FTV, the newer scenes definitely are tamer in the public parts. You get some flashing but little else. They stopped using the "NU!" public nudity tag unless there is more risky/masturbation and only 1 of the last 12 releases has the NU! tag.
|
06-15-19 10:25am
|
Comment
693
|
Shemax Network
(0)
|
|
06-13-19 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
694
|
Shemax Network
(0)
|
|
06-06-19 07:46am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
695
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
It surprised me when they went to that strange system of only allowing members to see recent scenes. It has been one of my favorite networks for a long time. The funny part for me is I originally joined it years ago for So Cal Coeds. It is still around but hasn't been updated since 2007. It's funny how 2007 made 37 scenes of exclusive Southern California college amateurs seem like such a big deal.
|
06-04-19 04:29pm
|
Reply
696
|
Evolved Fights
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Hey Marc,
Thanks, the site is a fun one. Seeing models laughing through half of the scene might be the best part.
|
06-04-19 04:25pm
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Most of the parts about James don't even go into the porn parts. Being a native of Los Angeles and not much older than him, there were always stories about what an entitled brat he was in everyday life. When you combine that with the allegations against him with female pornstars they both look true.
With Pierre it was a little more complex. He has since said he has changed. He has pictures with some of the models, not during a porn scene, but at conventions and events where they are hugging him to show how much he has changed and been forgiven. He went through a phase in his casting from 2003-2006 where if the model said she did not do anal, he would do it ... without lube. If they said they did not like facials he would grab their head and make them swallow. It was true exploitation but it was in Hungary and other former USSR countries. He would work it into the storyline to make it look fake, "Either do it or no pay". I never believed his change because it just so happened to coincide with new sex worker laws in Hungary.
He was a regular member here at one time. When I posted my negative review of his site, the original owner Rick and original admin Khan delisted his site after viewing some of the scenes for themselves. The site he has now does not have the questionable scenes on it anymore. Even so, anytime I see Pierre now I see him spitting in a model's face or making them swallow or the no lube anal.
|
05-28-19 07:45pm
|
Reply
698
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
zebulon27's Comment
Epoch/Paypal rejects my Visa payment. They must only allow Mastercard. I haven't had any problems canceling this site but I join through Kelly Madison. It gives access to Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity.
|
05-28-19 06:51am
|
Reply
699
|
N/A
|
Reply of
FreddieAdmin's Poll
Used to, a site could have 100 of the most beautiful models in the world but if they did not have at least 1 Eve Angel video I would not join.
Now, Eve is retired, so I now look at the niches more than the models. I don't have any favorite models anymore.
|
05-23-19 10:18pm
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Poll
James Deen and Pierre Woodman.
I reached a friendly agreement with Pierre right here on Porn Users but I still won't watch his videos.
Just have heard too many bad things about James.
For what it's worth, I don't watch a lot of hardcore anymore so it's no big loss.
|
05-23-19 10:15pm
|
