Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nice high quality production values
- Segpay is the biller and did a great job on helping me out with a problem I had.
- Very attractive American models. You won't likely find an unattractive one.
- Each scene has downloadable photo sets.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max)
- 70 scenes and all have 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads.
Cons:
- One that's starting to irritate my OCD, randomly generated username and password. I spent years coming up with a way to create secure passwords I could remember.
- Kind of a surprising one, you're not going to find many models that fit the "exotic" group.
- Filenames tell you nothing about the scene.
Bottom Line:
It seems like a big draw of this site is it's many of the models first time doing anal. I am indifferent to anal so that's not a big plus for me, but it should be mentioned. Most of these models are known which is why I looked into "it's their very first time of what?" Gianna Dior, Sophia Leone, Sadie Pop to name a few I knew right off the bat and wondered how it could be their first time at anything but the Gianna Dior scene says it's her very first porn scene. I know some collectors are into first time performances.
The scenes appear longer than they are. Though I wouldn't complain that much about it. They are listed in the 40-50 minute range each but all do include a 10-15 minute interview. Sometimes these give you some insight into what is going to be the very first time, others don't.
This is mostly straightforward sex with the model's very first time being the "story". If porn producers are right, you should pay attention to the model list since I have heard several porn producers say the models best scene of their career was their first one.
The problem there is there are only 70 scenes and from what I have seen the site isn't updating.
The good news is the content is all filmed in very high quality with 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads, photo set downloads and the navigation is easy to use.
I am scoring it a little higher than I would for myself. I don't collect any of these models. Their first scene is no different than their 100th to me. But when I did collect by models, finding a first scene was one of the really fun parts about collecting porn.
That is why I think the high quality is very important here. This site is geared towards those that collect specific models.
I don't think my rating would be higher than an 80 if it wasn't for the first time part. It's just too small of a site, not updating and it's a premium price for a site this size.
It's not unusual for me to burnout on scenes with just newer models unless they are amateurs. Check the model list or scenes list before joining. If you collect some of them I would recommend joining it. If not, maybe you're a collector of first time anal, I would recommend it for those but just by itself and no interest in the first time part, I would have trouble recommending it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ultra high quality site with a fun niche.
- Roughly 150 models, I use roughly because the model photos are not showing up on the model list and have knocked it out of order. A few models have multiple scenes.
- The niche itself is a selling point as oily, lubed, greasy is a common theme in each scene.
- Top-level, well-known, mainstream models.
- There are 186 scenes with all scenes having up to 4K available.
- Bills through Segpay and they were a major help to me.
Cons:
- Site has some glitches. The photos don't load properly, that includes the model thumbnails and photo sets.
- The photo sets are tiny in amount of photos.
- Despite having joined with platinum access, it still advertises "upgrade to platinum access" on every page.
Bottom Line:
This isn't really a network. It's the Porn Pros Premium sites package. I originally joined Cum4k and they offered me access to all their premium sites for $69.95. I upgraded to it and Lubed is one of those premium sites.
I know a biller shouldn't be focused on too much in a review but Segpay went way above and beyond what I expected from them. Part of the problem is Cum4k's login is different from the login to the upgrade sites. I had received no welcome emails from either Cum4K or the platinum upgrade package. It started dawning on me that there was a chance I had made a mistake during the sign-up process. I had entered my email address at (one domain), when it was supposed to be another. The welcome emails were not coming to me. I contacted Segpay and they found my orders. They fixed the wrong email problem and did so with complete friendly and courteous service.
That doesn't mean the sites were going to make me happy. Since it's not a network, you have to sign in on each site and the sites don't recognize you've already upgraded. It actually shows their other sites being locked but I can sign in on them. The broken thumbnail pictures of the models is kind of sad seeing how high quality their content is.
I was also disappointed a little by the TBP review listing this site under the "group sex" category. There are 7 group sex scenes out of 186.
Lubed kind of reminds me of the old site/series, Big Wet Asses. Most of the scenes have the model lubing herself up, rubbing oil all over her naked body and I enjoy that part. The sex is ho-hum. This is becoming very common to me. The quality of the action is 100% dependent on the model. Some are very flexible, almost all are very attractive. But some are just boring. It's a very professional, polished site. Which makes the broken thumbnails seem a little out of place.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well.
The navigation, especially if you buy the whole upgrade package, is really good once you've signed into all the sites. An example, if you are watching Jade Kush's scene on Lubed, below it will be her other scenes on their other premium sites and if you've signed into those, you can just click those and go straight to them.
I do think they could make that easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them.
The categories do seem to be accurate. It's still not a standout site to me because the niche is controlling the scene and only the models really into the niche are excelling in the scenes. This might be common for me to say but the best scene is Vina Sky's. She's a very energetic performer and doesn't disappoint here. Some of the others look like they're watching a television that's out of the camera's view.
I was disappointed in the photo sets. Besides the pictures not showing up to view, there are a limited amount of photos in the zips and the screencaps can be made just as easily by using VLC and setting it to take a screencap every few seconds. I would have thought a site with this high of standards would have better photo sets.
It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector and they have a model you collect as this content is exclusive. The scenes are relatively long (30 minutes plus) and they bring in something I haven't seen much which is the one part I really like about the site. The female model starts the scene completely solo. She teases, she oils herself up and even masturbates before the guy even enters the scene.
I'm going to make some laugh when I say they could have just had the models teasing, oiling themselves up and masturbating. That's the best part of the scenes. If you have some spare money laying around and want a whole package of high quality sites I would recommend the whole package if they're offering the $69.95 price. There's quite a bit of diversity in the niches they offer. It's a good site on its own but not much above average.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Point of View site that does the reverse cowgirl POV as good as anyone.
- Good blend of models from stars to ones I've never seen.
- 286 scenes according to my count (see cons and bottom line).
- 146 of the scenes have 1080p, 5 have up to 4K and some of the oldest scenes drop to 480p.
- Photos/screencaps with zip downloads are available.
- Good navigation features and accurate tags.
- Active webmaster that is both helpful and listens to his fans.
Cons:
- It's become clear that there is a certain level of recycle or lost content on the sites on this network.
- As much as I like POV, I do think it gets more repetitive than other hardcore filming styles.
- The oldest scenes here really should be remastered.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Mr. POV is the old story of a guy with a camera. They do a better job of POV filming than the average POV site. There's very little bouncing of the camera. Another part they do well with POV that other POV sites fail at is they have the volume at a good, balanced level. A lot of POV sites are very loud due to the camera being in the guy's hand.
They excel most at the reverse cowgirl position, one of the most underrated positions in POV porn. I think this position comes closest to making you feel like you're there. It's a very flattering position for the model (in most cases) and if you've had much reverse cowgirl sex you know you really don't get this good of a view in person.
The models are mostly teen to late 20s. You'll find some stars here like Aaliyah Love and the long-forgotten Bree Olsen, I recognize Allie Addison as a newer model. I don't know that she is that new but she does have a scene here.
I'm not going to completely bomb the score on the review for what is either lost content or removing content and recycling it. Their webmaster is pretty up front about they're a small group. They sometimes don't have new content so they re-release an older favorite. I would like to see them remaster. As for the recycling, which is something I wouldn't say unless I knew it was happening and I felt like it could help others. Those of us that are collectors do look at the numbers to see how much new has been added since our last membership. I've been a member here at least 8 times (since 2015). The 2015 TBP review lists over 300+ scenes. Looking at the content currently there are 17 pages with 16 scenes per page, that's 272 scenes and the 18th page has 14 scenes on it for a total of 286, that's at least 14 less scenes than they had in 2015.
What saves the network and this site too is this is overall a underrepresented niche. Not really the POV but their style of filming, this is porn that is very safe to watch with a woman. It's how I found these sites. One of my exes was really into Manojob and the style of filming they do even on Mr. POV.
It's easy to recommend it to someone that's never been a member or someone that has been a member but didn't keep their downloads. The content they have is very good. If it was me, I would take those old scenes down and start remastering them and put the 720p and up scenes on it.
They're one of those sites/networks that will get some added points for ease of use, good tags, active webmaster, they're trying to make it work and I appreciate that about them.
I would be even happier with Mr POV if they started doing some pussy tease from reverse cowgirl. They do it some on Manojob. It's a good supporting site to the Finishes the Job network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Reality Kings takes another shot at making a unique site.
- Excels as much at humor as it does porn and that's not an insult. The humor of some of the scenes is great.
- The site has 161 scenes and updates 3 times a week.
- Major stars everywhere, Abella Danger, Vina Sky, Serena Santos, Abella has multiple scenes on here and if you're familiar with her "acting" ability you can imagine how funny some of those are.
- The sneaky part can be something as simple as standing behind a counter with the girl on her knees giving a blowjob to behind a cubicle with someone sitting beside it.
- It's a fun site. J-Mac, whether you like him or not, is hilarious in some of the scenes.
- Sometimes I think maybe porn needs these sillier sites instead of the low sound, serious scenes that make you feel like you're watching a low budget silent film.
Cons:
- I bought a 6 month membership with RK back in May. You don't have to worry about charging problems with the 6 month one as it's non-recurring. It didn't come with downloads. None of the sites, not even the standard RK sites. I chose to upgrade to downloads at $14.95 and they've charged me $14.95 each month, it wasn't a one time charge. I'm not going to complain that much. I like their content. I'll end up having about $140 in a 6 month membership. But it's fair warning for everyone else.
- Some of the scenarios are so bad they aren't even believable. Then, they put J-Mac in those and he's giggling. That's a touchy con that might bother some. I still find the humor in it and like that part of it.
Bottom Line:
Have you ever been talking to your best friend from across the counter and thought about your daughter being on her knees in front of him giving him a blowjob? Reality Kings thought of it and this is their site dedicated to content like that. I like it. I've always said I thought RK put a lot of effort in making their scenes unique.
I mentioned Vina Sky on a review several months ago of Little Asians and she's becoming the next big star as I thought she would be. She has one of the best scenes on this site.
Here's some more scenarios:
You walk in your office and your married receptionist dropped something under your desk. She's down on all fours looking for it giving you a full upskirt view of her ass.
Let's go with one of J-Mac's best performances on the site. You're working in an office cubicle with Lana Mars. You catch her masturbating and lean her against the cubicle while an elderly employee looks around trying to figure out where the noises are coming from.
I at least give them credit for trying something new, no matter how unbelievable it is. There's the added turn-on of seeing the couple doing the sneaky sex being caught. Sometimes the person catching them gets involved, other times they act like they are sickened by what they saw.
Once I unlocked the downloads there are the basic download options of 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are no 4K videos, but all 161 scenes have those four options up to 1080p. There are also photo sets and download with each scene.
It's one of the better newer sites I've seen and I think a lot of that is the quality of the models. The setup to each scene lasts 4-6 minutes so they at least are showing some of that unlike other sites that show a minute or less of a setup.
My overall feeling is I was a little disappointed in the no downloads option and the $15 per month fee for a 6 month membership I had paid for once. When I joined RK for 6 months, it was $49.95. The 6 months of $15 charges was $90 more.
Once this 6 months runs out, I will come back when they start including downloads even if it's a higher join price. Which is why I'm not that disappointed. It averaged out to about $25 a month and I think I have everything I would want from here for a few years even.
I would recommend this site for those into unbelievable exhibitionism, betrayal sex and humor porn. That's a genre we don't see much.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of pornstars Mark Wood and Francesca Le ... but wait it's also a network that is a network in the Evil Angel network.
- If you like hardcore porn this is the place for you.
- Massive collection of porn.
- There are 25 websites in the network including possibly the most disgusting website ever created, Milk Enema.
- Very high quality technically and in production values. You would think people this perverted wouldn't care about production values but they do.
- Download speeds are the fastest I have had, it's about 90% of my max.
- Some legendary producers are here including Buttman John Stagliano.
- Navigation is pretty good once you figure out what you're doing.
Cons:
- Enough with the confusing crap. It says Evil Angel Network once I signed in, so is this just an Evil Angel clone? It also does not come with Adult Time and this is a Gamma Entertainment site. Look at it this way: LeWood is a 24-25 website network and it is on the Evil Angel Network which I had never heard of and through my Evil Angel account, I have access to Adult Time. Do one network. Not three. Not two. One.
- There is some very hardcore content on here. I am not against it but it should be mentioned in cons.
Bottom Line:
I can't seem to get out of this cycle of Gamma sites. This is one time I think having the ability to post a picture or screenshot would help with this review. My tab at the top of the screen says, "Evil Angel Network" not LeWood. In another tab, I have Evil Angel open.
This is where I am going to get frustrated. As an Evil Angel Member, I can search in "directors" for LeWood. Here are a couple names of the most recent LeWood scenes on Evil Angel:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 4, scene 3, scene 2 and scene 1.
On LeWood's website the most recent scenes are:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 3, 2 and 1. There are also 5 other LeWood scenes in-between those. So, part of the newest content on LeWood could be gotten from Evil Angel. Even worse, Evil Angel already has parts 1-4 of Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening while LeWood, the director of the scenes only has 1-3 on their website.
To me, that hurts both LeWood and Evil Angel. Evil Angel's biggest selling point for years was the exclusivity of their content. There's no way I can sit here and go through each of the LeWood sites and see just how many them are near clones of content on Evil Angel.
It kind of feels like LeWood is a spinoff of Evil Angel at a higher price. Even more odd that I have Adult Time access with Evil Angel but not with LeWood.
The good thing is I am a fan of a lot of Evil Angel content. I like their quality, the depth of their content and their production values.
By my count there are around 8,000 scenes. The content dates all the way back to 2000.
The videos started with 1080p around 2009 and every video since has up to 1080p quality with 6 lower options. They cover the quality very well. They also have a pictures category and I honestly can't tell you what the photos are related to.
As example, the video update on 3-14-2019 is of those devilish Ortega twins and on 3-15-2019, the late bloomer Vicki Chase. The 3-14-2019 photo set is of Luana Navarro, a transsexual model. It says it's from Luana Navarro Set 2. These seem to be legit photo sets and not screencaps but it doesn't match the video releases. All of the videos have a "related pictures" link that is usually to 6-10 photos. These specific "photo sets" have over 200 photos in them and are downloadable.
It makes you wonder if these sites have a tester that goes through the site as a member to see how the experience is.
A big selling point here is my girlfriend likes transsexuals but she only likes solo transsexuals. One of the transsexual sites on this network is called She Plays with Her Cock. I was showing my girlfriend the site and every scene is a transsexual with a man. Why would you name a site "she plays with her cock" and then have the model having hardcore sex? It would be like a site being named "She plays with her pussy" then you open it and she's having sex in every scene.
Confusion seems to be the theme here. It's definitely not bad. It could use some changes. The site works very good just like every Gamma site does.
If you're curious about Milk Enema, they squirt milk into the model's ass and she squirts it back out into other people's mouths. Don't take that as me being nasty. Take it as me saying I'm telling you what is so the curiosity won't lead you to watch a scene! Tori Black, one of my all-time favorite models, has a scene on it and her scene isn't that bad. Some of them are very graphic. It is an older site that hasn't updated but maybe 3 times in the last 4 years but you've been warned.
Most hardcore doesn't bother me at all. I grew up watching Buttman scenes. Those old Buttman DVDs are still very good, similar to an old Vivid DVD.
My main complaint is how much of this content is already on Evil Angel? I probably won't join again because I believe the majority of what I would want is on Evil Angel. I don't mean to say that as a way to hurt their business. I just don't like joining two sites that have the same content on them.
There is nothing in the members area to make me think LeWood is a separate website or network. The url for LeWood's homepage is members (dot) evilangelnetwork (dotcom) en (slash) videos (slash) lewood. It's a subdomain of Evil Angel Network.
These sites are getting carried away with all this need for networks and confusing prices. Of note, Evil Angel, Adult Time and LeWood all go up to $29.95 in the second month.
Definitely not my most coherent review but the content I'm reviewing isn't very clear. I'm giving it an 86 because it's good, hardcore porn, in very high quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of porn's most prominent studios. A long-history of porn with a plot and parodies of mainstream movies plus you get their celebrity collection if you're into that.
- They have started allowing downloads.
- I'm confident that every major porn star (prior to 2010) has at least one scene on here.
- Navigation is pretty good, it has to be or else I would lower the score a lot for the hassle the site puts up.
- Though it might not look like it, there are full DVDs here, you just have to search by title to find all the scenes for each.
- I'm going to put this with a slight asterisk, download speed has been very good but I downloaded a couple of the older scenes earlier and wasn't even getting half my regular download speed, possibly on a different server?
- This is a strange pro but there's lots of non-facial cumshots!
- Major stars have lots of content and short-lived Vivid stars do as well. April Flowers has 51 scenes, I didn't know she filmed that many scenes.
Cons:
- Oh for fuck's sake, could you figure out how to squeeze one more ad onto the site? No joke, there are 16 individual ads on a page, most are chat models, others are for Vivid penis pills and one huge one at the top of the screen about how to get 120 free chat tokens. To put this all into perspective, this is on a model's page. It shows 8 equal sized scenes by the model with 16 ads.
- The rarely seen SBW biller, seems easy enough to cancel but haven't seen them in years.
- While it doesn't bother me, scenes have been removed from the stream-only days. For me, there's enough of the classic content to offset this but definitely some are missing.
Bottom Line:
Tired of watching loud-mouthed guys who sound like squealing pigs when cumming? Try some Vivid! Back to the days of Tom Selleck mustaches, old-school Oakley blade sunglasses and Zubazz pants. Call it cheesy but the women and action are hotter than today's porn.
Two girls with a guy and one girl dodges the cumshot? Not here. One of the favorite hobbies of Vivid watchers is to see how often the would-be dodger gets hit on the cheek by a cumshot aimed at the other woman's mouth. April Flowers, just known as April on here is one of my favorite porn actresses of all-time. She's a Latina who lied about her race because Latina wasn't a genre in the late 90s, early 2000s, she even used the April Flowers and April Rain name to try not to show her Latina background. The only problem was her Latina backside couldn't help but show as she wiggled, grinded and twisted it to humble every man Vivid threw at her. As the old saying goes, she didn't even look the part. One of those cum dodging threesomes features April and a younger Raylene than current porn fans know. Raylene supposedly loved having cumshots on her belly and boobs, April wasn't feeling the scene since she was mostly just watching, she's laying there and the cumshot hits her chin and arm. According to lore, she filmed the "Marissa" scene the next day and made the guy cum four times. Maybe that's what made the late 90s, early 2000s Vivid porn so good?
April, Kobe Tai, Asia Carrera, Taylor Hayes, Raylene, Shelbee Myne, Charlie, Charlie Angel, Sky Lopez, a very young Belladonna and Zara White, just off the top of my head, seemed to be constantly competing with each other. You got nearly perfect performances from them in every scene.
I joined this site back about 5 years ago to get the scenes the Vivid channel on Videobox didn't have but it was stream only. One of my all-time favorite DVD series is "The Watcher", it's what it says, a voyeur watches two or more people have sex. It was revolutionary for its time (90s-2000s). One of the more memorable scenes was Charlie and some guy sneaking into a prison, they start to have sex and this guy appears, just watching, it seemed to kick Charlie into another gear. They still have those on here for download. Those alone are worth the price.
But also being able to download scenes of my favorites who I haven't seen content of for download is a huge plus too.
As impressed as I am with the content that is available, there's a chunk of content missing too. I don't see it as a huge negative simply because I'm happy to just get these scenes I hadn't been able to download.
In my pros I said the navigation is pretty good and it is. How else could you find anything among the ads? The model search works but that always falls back on the person knowing who they're looking for. Doing DVD title searches also works but again, you have to know what you're looking for.
After that, the navigation is bad. And the site layout plays into that. They've also taken liberties with renaming models. April Flowers is no longer that, she's just April. Raylene's various last names have been removed as have Charlie's which makes it confusing because there's also a Charlie Angel, the name Charlie sometimes used except it was Charlie's Angel.
Navigation also makes it very hard to come up with a definitive number of scenes. They have as many as 20 on title searches and there's no numbers on how many pages there are. Instead, you just click an arrow and it loads the next 20. All of this could be improved. Throw in the old biller and the 2 pre-selected cross-sales with 2 more upsale ads showing up before allowing me into the member's area and these things alone are taking 10 points off the score.
Many of these scenes are nearing 20 years old. They have a 1080p download option on all. They also have a 720p and SD option. I downloaded some 1080p of April's old scenes and the properties say 1920x1080 but they're not. For one, the scenes are 4:3, so there's a black box around each side and for two, the bitrates on the 1080p are only in the 4,000 range. Before throwing them under the bus, these do look better, cleaner than the Vivid Classic scenes I have from Videobox. So, maybe they've done all they can with them and that's good enough for me. You can even see in the filesizes (most 1080p at 500-600 MB), that these are not 1080p scenes.
Still, where are you going to get these great scenes? I've been through a lot of porn, moving it, deleting it but I've never deleted a single scene from my Vivid folder. One last warning is the site is overwhelming with the ads, the questionable search, so I do think if they cleaned up all these site layout and navigation problems they would have a really great site. As it is, for collectors and curious ones, it's a great find. A couple of longtime favorite scenes: April and Raylene in House of Lies #3, April and Raylene again in Bad Wives #2 and the aforementioned April in Marrisa.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A porn network based around massages.
- 8 sites included the network, all 8 are massage-themed.
- 3 to 4 updates per week (across the network) depending on how the days fall.
- Videos have download options from 180p to 1080p, picture sets seem to be screenshots from the video, but can be downloaded in zips.
- Navigation can be good, but can be annoying too, will further in BL.
- Download speeds are above average, about 70% of my max.
- The combination of various niches thanks to the multiple site format helps it not be as repetitive.
Cons:
- It's still repetitive and formulaic.
- Navigation gets a mention here too. Will further in BL.
- Not a big variety in models, most or all are well-known porn stars and some variety in race.
- This goes into the navigation, Members Fantasy site, is listed as a separate site and counted as such, but its content appears on multiple sites on the network. While Fantasy Massage Pilots is also listed as a site, but seems to only be something like a network hub.
Bottom Line:
I like the network. It's formulaic and repetitive, but they do at least try to buildup the scenes. It has terrible acting as expected, but it's at least humorous.
As you can see, 4 of the 8 sites aren't updating anymore and one gets a question mark because it's the same content I get when I go to "all sites". It has Member Fantasy and Nuru scenes showing. So, unless something is just redirecting wrongly there, that's only 3 sites that are updating.
The models are very attractive. Production values are very good for a site in this price range. The girl/girl scenes are my favorites on the network. Those, even when going into oral and tribbing, still have something of a massage theme.
Navigation problems seemed very minor at first, but the further I got into my membership, the more they started annoying me. Here's what happens:
Along the left margin is a list of the sites in the network. You can click on any specific one or you can click on "all sites" and it combines all the sites. Here's the problem, if you click on say, "Nuru Massage", it opens Nuru Massage, you then click on the home button and instead of taking you back to the hub it drops you back in Nuru Massage. You can even click "all sites" and you're dropped back in Nuru Massage. The only way I've figured out to work around this is to click your profile then go back to home and it breaks whatever coding that sends you back to the site you were on. Also, it looks like the "Member Fantasy" scenes are shared among the sites.
That's not a huge problem, but when one of the sites sends me back to the hub (Fantasy Massage Pilots), and the other sites won't send me back to the hub, there's an annoying problem. But still, not that big of a deal.
Overall, I think the network is very good, especially for the price, plus you at least do get a little buildup in the scenes since they have this working massage theme. I've always wondered if porn directors realize some of us like the buildup because it lets us see the women doing something besides sex?
Technical quality is excellent unless you're wanting 4k. I've reviewed several of these networks, all are under the Fame Cash umbrella and all follow very similar designs, standards (180p to 1080p and all between resolutions). These types of sites/networks are becoming very common and kind of remind me of the old DVD sites. Meaning, you get a lot of content for your money, but a lot of it is interchangeable. The advantage is these sites in this network are exclusive, at least to the best of my knowledge they are. It's good, value-priced porn. Not a lot to complain about, but not a lot to get excited about it either.
I would recommend it for porn fans in general. Lots of models, would share a number, but they include males in their model list and have no way to just see females. It's over 500. There's a lot of content overall too, but I can't put a fair number on it since they have one site bouncing me back to the main hub and another (Fantasy Massage) that is shared throughout the network.
Good network overall, but could fix a few problems mentioned and just merge those dead sites to make things a little cleaner and clearer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very realistic and believable amateur site.
- Really pretty women considering the nature of the site, also see a blend of races and shapes.
- Videos are clear, but have to go premium to get the 1080p videos, my membership came with 720p as the top option. Which is fine with me.
- Download speed is above average, the newer releases seem to take a little longer to download.
- The scenes are generally long (40-50 minutes).
- Bonus access to Girls Do Toys, BTS content and interviews.
- From the best I can tell they update weekly, this leads into the cons that others have pointed out too.
Cons:
- What the hell is going on with this site's navigation? I'm glad I was OCD before joining it, otherwise, it would have made me OCD. I'll go more into this in the bottom line.
- No pictures? If there are pictures I can't find them.
- Premium upgrade for the 1080p, I honestly wish sites would just remove that option since it makes me feel like I'm missing out on something. Hey, blame the OCD from the navigation!
Bottom Line:
Okay, I really like this site. It's repetitive, but the models are the draw. I don't recognize hardly any of these women from other sites or from DVDs, there could be some though. I don't mind the silly premium upgrade part, it's just I don't understand why sites are going to it. I will be really frustrated if I find out there are pictures if you upgrade, otherwise, they lose 5 points for no pictures. What's the point of amateur girls if you don't show them in their regular clothes and have a little tease?
This site's navigation isn't the worst I've seen, but it's confusing. When you click a scene to download or stream, 12 more scenes pop up directly under the streaming video. It reminds me of the scene cutter Videobox uses except the content is just other models. There's no names on the models. The filenames are numbers. Give me some organization please. There's no model list since there's no model names. Do they maybe have multiple scenes of certain models or no?
Having said that, that's all that's wrong with this site. It's a lot since I now have a folder with a bunch of unidentifiable files in it, but the content is very good. It's slightly irritating since I'm not the first person who has complained, which means they most likely have no plans to correct it.
Instead of something easy and logical, you'll find 33 pages of videos with 12 models per page, unless you look through them from the main page where you'll find 49 pages of 8 models. Jeez.
Back to the models, late teens, early 20s, skinny, athletic, well-built (butts and boobs), white, black, mixed, Asian, Hispanic, it's a dream come true for someone like me. Of course I could say I want to see some more built models and maybe some slightly heavier ones, but overall, these models are what I like. Now, if I just knew their names so I could find them when I'm looking through the folder of numbered files.
I don't know if my score is that fair. I know I generally rate higher, but a lot of that is based on my own problems with understanding the difference between a 50 and a 70. I'm rating it above average for me just because of the models. The amateur aspect does bring in some of those scenes where it's way too clear that the model is just there for the money, not to enjoy the sex. And while I'll agree and understand that, it does hurt some of the appeal.
With all the navigation issues, I'd still recommend it for a month, if you like amateur models, you'll probably love this site, would go another 10 points on the score if they did something with the navigation, model names and added photos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very large network of some classic sites and some good newer sites.
- Give Me Pink is the top site for me and it looks like they've added it back now 4/22/2017.
- Excellent technical quality throughout the network including a relatively high number of 4k scenes, no use to me, but it's worth mentioning.
- Navigation is okay. If you mess with the tags enough you'll find that the navigation is good, but if you're impatient with the tags, you'll think it's pretty bad.
- Very good photo sets, would compare their quality to In the Crack and once questioned if Give Me Pink and In the Crack were the same company.
- Download speed is good, I'm now able to max download on porn sites at 10MB/s, I'm able to get around 8MB/s on Perfect Gonzo. Most porn sites give me 5-6 MB/s.
- Good update schedule, 10 updates so far in April, two are interviews and there were 13 updates in March, so nearly every other day.
- Huge price savings over what these sites used to cost.
Cons:
- Well, to start with, I spent the first 12 days of my membership locked out of my account. It's not a glitch or fluke. They even have a link on their login page that says, "Can't login? Forgot your password? Blocked account? Try our unblocking tool here!" Will further this in BL.
- Sites disappear then reappear. Both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush were included in the network when I signed up, then after the 12 days of being locked out, they were both gone. Now, 5 days later, they are back.
- Seems they struggle with real, legit criticism as seen by someone posting a comment to mock mine. A person who admits they were given a free membership. Mr. Perfect Gonzo webmaster, you own or run a site in an industry that has zero integrity, don't give people a reason to question yours.
- Interviews. I'm tired of disputing these with webmasters. I joined a porn site not a get to know me site.
Bottom Line:
This network intrigued as much as any network I've ever seen. One exception might be the Kink Network, but even so, Perfect Gonzo has multiple sites in it that I used to pay $29.99 a month for each one. I also had been under the impression that sites like Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic were lost in the Euro porn meltdown of 2009-2011. But now all of a sudden, those sites are going strong as is the whole network.
The technical quality here should be a big draw for those who like the big resolutions. They have 4k videos dating back to October 2014. Maybe more impressive, they have 1080p dating back to 2006. These videos also have smaller resolutions for download as well. Their picture sets are downloadable and the newer ones are 5000 long end. This part of the site is very impressive to say the least.
The navigation is good, at least to me, it's a clean network hub page that has a few easy to miss helpful parts. There's a drop-down box that allows you to filter the updates to a specific site within the network. There's tags that include the separate sites, actions, to filter the updates to your taste or interest. They even have a bonus section that has content from Blacked, Cum Louder, Teen Dreams, Sapphic Erotica, though I did watch a few of the scenes and wonder if they're just cut portions of the scenes. Still, everything is looking really good.
They use Epoch as a biller which is always a plus. The models are top-tier. You'll mostly see a bunch of Euro models, especially if you go into the older content as these sites used to be almost exclusively Euro. I'll even say a thank you to them for putting a picture zip download link in with the download links for the videos. It's a small thing, but most of us get frustrated with having to back out of video downloads, click on photos, click on download photos.
There's a good blend of genres on the network. There's solo girls, lesbian scenes, creampie, gangbang, pretty much everything you can think of outside of gay or transsexual.
At this point, I honestly believe the network is a 90+
But ... I'm now halfway through my membership and have had access to the network for only 3 days, have seen Give Me Pink content just for 2 days. Looking at my email account, I have 9 emails between Perfect Gonzo and Epoch about the login problems. Not a single one of the Perfect Gonzo ones are from an employee, a webmaster, but instead are automated emails that insist my password hadn't changed, even though it wouldn't work. On top of that, there's the link on the login page that says if your account was locked, to click the link and it will refresh your account. I did it 3 different times, loading time for the page was 3-5 minutes. It would then tell me a new password had been sent to my email. I would go check ... no email with a new password. I would check Spam/Junk ... no email. Then when I did have access, right after signing up, the Give Me Pink and Fist Flush content disappeared. As of today, 4/23/2017, both of those sites are back on this network with all their content.
I can accept glitches and any kind of technical problems, but did I really need to have 9 emails, 3 attempted password refreshes and 13 days of no access just to get the access I had paid for? I'll again point out the comment left here on PU to offset and mock mine. I'm knocking 10 points off the review for that.
This network is plenty good enough to let its content do its talking for it. One of the best I've seen when it's not removing sites or blocking access. But worse than that is when a paying member is mocked by a member who received free access. As Khan used to say, "A shill is still a shill no matter what color you paint it."
Overall content numbers:
Roughly 2,050 full scenes, each includes video and picture set as of 4/23/2017.
10 different websites within the network. Several of which I've paid $29.99/month to be a member of in the past.
I would normally say this content is exclusive, but can no longer say that since Give Me Pink and Fist Flush also come with a Sapphic Erotica membership.
If they can get over the technical problems with the site and keep those 10 sites in their network, I wouldn't be surprised if this ended up being one of the top 10 sites in the porn world. It's that good, but they need to stop me from saying "but" before I rate it that high. Paying $30 for a site in this day and age is a bit high, but I could still see it being worth that. As it is though, I'm going to end up receiving about 16 days of membership for $30.
You can do the math. I subtracted 10 points for the overall frustration between the site, lack of responses, the shill comment to offset my real, paying member legitimate complaint and see how high this network could score if all that gets fixed.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer network from the same people who brought us 21 Sextury.
- I could be wrong, but from looking at the models on this network, I don't see a single set of implants or any tattoos (this is only a pro for some, as neither of those bother me).
- Good amount of content, close to 400 scenes, includes picture set and video with each scene.
- Every scene on the site has 1080p video option, 540p, 480p and the small mobile resolution.
- Pictures get into resolutions that remind me of the top-tier photo sites, many are 6000 high end and all sets come zipped.
- Download speeds are very good, over 90% of my max download speed.
- Despite being a "softer" network, it does have a whole section (around 30 scenes) of anal sex and includes over 80 scenes of foot sex, a genre that 21 Sextury with their Footsie Babes site, along with DDF and Viv Thomas mastered long ago. Nice to see it making a comeback.
Cons:
- It's hard to complain about navigation, but I'm going to. Should be easy to navigate with less than 500 scenes, but the search functions don't seem to recognize this network. What I mean, if I click a model's name on 21 Naturals network, it shows me all of the model's scenes on 21 Sextury, 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals, instead of just 21 Naturals.
- I'm putting this in cons though I know it's a positive for a lot of members. This network is similar to X-Art, Sex Art, believe the words I've heard used are glamcore and heartcore. It's not that I have a problem with it, but I usually prefer a little bit harder than what they offer.
- Falls into the same pitfalls other heartcore sites fall into. Put an experienced veteran male actor with an 18 year old innocent, inexperienced model who has never had anal sex. Now make it sensual and erotic. It ends up looking painful.
Bottom Line:
The heartcore genre has been going strong for several years, but I never really saw it as innovative or new even. This network itself includes a "foot/leg sex" site. I believe heartcore is just an extension of "foot/leg sex". The only difference being heartcore doesn't usually include any leg/foot focus. Funny thing is, I'm not a foot fetishist at all, but Viv Thomas especially, excelled at producing what he called "leg sex". Besides having some focus on foot/leg it was typically more believable, emotional, passionate sex.
My point there is they really don't need a foot/leg sex site in this network since the majority of the scenes fall into the foot/leg sex genre.
One big plus for this network compared to other heartcore sites is there's some spontaneity in the scenes. Whether it's produced/staged/written in or not, it's believable enough to make those scenes stand out. This could be something as simple as both the guy and girl being naked, you're waiting for the typical formulaic pattern to start only to see a 5-7 minute handjob from the woman instead.
The quality of everything is worth a mention. Having nearly 400 total scenes at 1080p, being exclusive content is pretty impressive. As are the near 6000 long end pictures. Maybe it's just me on this one, but the pictures I've looked at have a cooler feeling to them than the normal 21 Sextury style of very warm photography. It's not better or worse, but it surprised me nonetheless.
The site updates 3 times per week. Each update includes one video and a full picture set. That is probably a fine line of whether they should try to add more content to beef up their numbers or just stick with the slower, high-quality method.
As of 1/1/2016, there are 31 scenes grouped into "erotic anal", 85 scenes grouped into "foot art" and another 277 scenes not separated into any particular genre.
I should throw in here that there's no lesbian content whatsoever on this network. There's a minimal amount of solo. I also haven't seen anything with more than 2 people in a scene. It's very straightforward.
I know we've had many disagreements over tattoos and implants here at PU, so those who dislike either or both of those should definitely check this network out. Unless I'm not paying attention or someone is good with video editing, I can't remember seeing any tattoos or implants on this network. The models vary from cute to pretty. Not a lot of variety in the models, most are slim, light complexion and for the believable factor, a lot of the sex seems genuinely painful to them. I use to say 21 Sextury has a factory somewhere where they churn out these pretty, slender models and this network won't make me change my mind on that.
I could definitely recommend it to those who like heartcore and those who like natural models. Those who like straightforward boy/girl sex. Those who have to have everything in HD and big pictures, but would warn that this genre can be very redundant. With a few more navigation options within the network, and maybe some more updates, this network could easily jump into the 90s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bryci is a sensual, brunette model who excels at posing, teasing and may be the best solo masturbation model I've seen in a few years.
- The site itself is pretty big, but not all scenes are masturbation, quite a few BTS, non-nude talking, will list the numbers in BL.
- Archive has webcam archived videos.
- From what I can see, all videos on the site are available in 1980x1080. Multiple video download options on all videos except webcam archives.
- Download speed is relatively good, but you will occasionally run into a slower moving file. I can max out at 3.8 MB/s, most will download around 3.0 MB/s, but a few were in the 1.6-1.9 MB/s range.
- Pictures are nice, but I had a few problems with them which will be in cons.
- Comes with 7 other similarly themed sites, the size of each greatly varies and I will do a review of the overall network separately to get all the numbers in.
- Price isn't too bad for the quality and especially if you like the models.
Cons:
- Pictures aren't zipped. This could be a major con to picture lovers since they have very high quality pictures 2662x4000.
- Download limit. Normally this would annoy the hell out of me, but I don't download near as much as I used to. It's listed as 9 GB per day, Webmaster says 10 GB, the most I've downloaded in a day is 5 GB, so I've had no problems with it. And since the terms say no scripts are allowed, I'm guessing you can't use a bulk image downloader for the pictures. It isn't being a problem for me though I thought it should be mentioned. One workaround without breaking the rules is to download the smaller quality videos, which I will get to in the BL.
Bottom Line:
Bryci has to be considered a serious contender for top solo model. The one negative some will find is she has implants, but I've never minded those either unless they are badly out of proportion. Hers aren't. The site is full of high quality content as well. I'm going to focus this next part on the numbers and qualities available since there is a download limit.
I'm counting 329 video scenes as of 1/27/13. There are 5 types of video scenes. Standard masturbation, Behind the Scenes, teasing, talking, webcam archive. The BTS and talking ones aren't something I'm going to download since there is a download limit, so those can be taken out of the equation. Her teasing scenes are short in length, 4-6 minutes usually, but if the attire she has on it is your thing, these are worth downloading. She has one scene in a white thin dress, in the shower, that is great as well as a workout tease scene that I loved.
The scenes I downloaded were masturbation, some teasing and the webcam archive. There's roughly 110 masturbation and/or tease scenes, it's hard to put a number on the webcam scenes that involve masturbation or nudity without watching them all, but several I've watched do have masturbation in them. It almost looks like Bryci may have started out as a tease type model. The videos date back to January 2009, so that's 4 years of content and plenty of time for her to have evolved from tease to masturbation. Most of the first year of updates are of the tease and BTS variety.
I know there are people who like the talking videos, but I'm sticking with my standard on those, I don't want to pay for a video of a woman answering questions. It seems to be a whole section of "Ask Bryci" videos. There also is an Amazon button so you can buy presents for Bryci, which I've laughed at dating back to Raven Riley. One more time, I pay to see your porn, not to have an option to pay for your gifts.
The video download options do vary since 1/5, maybe 1/4 are webcam, these are in Flash only, but you can download them.
The other videos have:
MP4 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360.
WMV 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360.
Flash 900x506
3GP 352x288
As you can see, the downloading options are very good and I personally download the Flash ones since it limits the size of the file, while giving me still good quality. From what I see in the members area you have all these options on all videos except the webcam archives.
The pictures are overall a disappointment. I've always removed points for no zip files and have removed 5 points from this review for it since I think the pictures add a lot to a solo site. I guess it's okay to download one at a time if you want to make you own set, but I would much prefer a zip option to download the whole set. It seems to go into a hollow debate of why have 4000 high end pictures if the members can't download the whole set. While I'm sure there are some who wouldn't want to download an entire set of photos at that high of quality since it would be a fairly big file. I like the option of having the option to download if I want them though.
Navigation is very easy, site design is nice and clean. There also are webcam shows, but I haven't watched any. Each thing you would need from navigation is in a toolbar towards the top of the screen, the only thing I would add is an option to filter out BTS scenes and separate webcam archive, but those are minor complaints since the title of each video says, "BTS" or "Webcam" so you don't have to guess at them.
Where Bryci earns the high score is in her performances. She's quite confident, seems to love teasing and works the camera as well as dare I say, a young Eve Angel. The eye contact with the camera, the "I know you're watching" expressions, is the best I've seen since 2006 Eve Angel. That alone keeps me interested in her content. She also seems to be pretty natural in her poses unlike a lot of Euro glam models. She shows a fun and playful side as well.
You do get access to Bella Pass Network which includes 6 other solo models and one other site that is a multi-model site. I won't go into those since I want to review the network as a whole, separately, but Bryci does seem to be the star of the network.
Bryci's site itself seems to update with video or photos 10 times a month. There also is a blog if you're interested in that and it is very active from what I saw of it. In January alone, there were 11 new entries in the blog.
One last part on the download limit. Downloading Flash files, I downloaded 12 videos earlier for a total of 2 GB. So considering I don't want the BTS or talking videos, I should be able to get most of the scenes I want without breaking the download limit.
Overall, download limits and no picture zips, notwithstanding, I would highly recommend it to solo fans.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Female domination of men. I don't know if it always includes the extra site, but when I joined it included Men in Pain.
- Unlike the last Kink site I reviewed (Public Disgrace), Divine Bitches and the added Men in Pain, combine for a very large collection. Large collection does have downfalls, will explain in BL.
- Divine Bitches has the full options on videos with HD being offered on close to 90% of all videos.
- I'm only putting pictures here because they do have them. The quality of them and how they are downloaded are cons.
- There seems to be varying degrees of femdom that this site showcases. Some of it is particularly interesting to me as someone with a past in psychology, other parts will turn a lot off, though I wasn't bothered by any of it. Will explain in BL.
- I like how Kink uses models who are mostly unknown or better yet, more exclusive to their sites, but as with anything it can be repetitive.
- Weekly update on Divine Bitches, no updates on Men in Pain.
Cons:
- I'll start with the main one. I knew going in that there was cuckold scenes. If you are offended by gay acts, you probably shouldn't join this site. I will further this in BL.
- The pictures are downloadable only in part zips. The quality of them is only 1280x720.
- This was talked about in my comment for this site in the replies, these men who the women are dominating, are mostly effeminate. It does take away most of the believability.
Bottom Line:
This was probably the most far-reaching porn experience for me. I have talked about my interest in the lighter side of cuckold. This is seen most in the DVDs like "Please Screw My Wife". With a long interest in the power/control aspects of sex, this genre at least interested me. I don't want this to turn into a lecture on psychological theory, but I'm on the side of humans who believes sex is most enjoyed when it's more lust than love. I also buy into the belief that there's a very thin line between love and hate, anger and joy and each of these represents a very strong emotion.
Men in Pain is a bonus site, but I'm guessing by looking at the update dates, Divine Bitches just became Men in Pain v.2. The Men in Pain site is mostly scenes with typical physical control games being played by the women. This site wouldn't interest me very much, but it is a nice bonus since you will see some more mainstream female models being very aggressive, which is rare for them. One that comes to mind is Jasmine Byrne. I always saw her as the pretty, little glamor model who went into submissive hardcore porn. Also can get some older scenes of Isis Love back when she was blonde and pre-implants. Outside of that though, Men in Pain, is of very little interest. I'm not exactly in position to fantasize about a small woman dominating me physically. I can see that now. Jasmine slapping me if she could reach my face, me saying, "aww that's cute". Sorry for the humor.
Divine Bitches is a whole other experience. This goes into mental and emotional pain. It has plenty of physical pain too, but it isn't limited to it. What you end up getting are scenes like this, woman tells her best female friend about her jerk husband. Female friend finds a big, tough guy and they go over to the woman's house. They force the husband to watch as his wife has sex with the other man.
Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the husband being forced to watch his wife have sex with another man, he's being forced to stick his face within inches of the penetration. His wife is saying things like compliments to the new man on his size and how her husband doesn't compare. We're getting deep here.
Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the man facing all the things in the above paragraph, but he's having to take the cumshot from the other man, giving the other man oral, in between pumps of his wife. This was a line to me.
It wasn't a line because it went too far. It became more obvious at that last level, the men being forced were bisexual or gay. I'm in no way trying to be an asshole about this, but the husband walks in the scene in a dress suit and tie. He has a masculine look. Then as soon as it comes time for him to do something labeled as "gay" he arches his back and becomes feminine. You lose me there.
This also applies to the scenes with just a male and female. Some of these men look to be lubing themselves up for a strap-on from their woman. Whether this goes into a gay act or not isn't the point. The point is it's about domination! The willing being dominated is not domination. Simple as that.
Overall, the site is good. The storylines are believable and even enjoyable in a distorted way. Like with other Kink sites, I do think you have to bring your imagination with you because of the fine line between what would be accepted and what would be going to far. For example, would having a real husband and wife in a scene, with the real straight male being forced to give a man a blowjob, be going into breaking laws? Keep the imagination handy and if you do, it's a good, very different site that might touch some emotions in you. And I'll give them a lot of credit for being risky and pushing boundaries, even if my imagination is still required.
The quality on the videos is pretty simple. Everything on Divine Bitches has up to HD except maybe 10 scenes. Each scene has smaller versions as well. With Men in Pain, you're going to be all over the place in quality. I downloaded one that was highest mp4 and it was 340x280. Did another and it was 720x480. Photo and navigation problems are the same as other Kink sites. No full photo zip download. Model list takes you to a network wide listing of each model and even if you have a membership to a site a scene is on, it tries to get you to sign up for the site or use pay on demand kinks, so it's useless. The best way to navigate the Kink sites is scroll, scroll, scroll.
These negatives are still fairly small and not enough to take away much from the site's overall grade. I do think for those who like to see women in dominant roles, it does the job. I could nitpick and say if the men were more masculine or even put up the least bit of resistance, but you do get the feeling the type of domination they are going for is the woman saying, "If you want me you will do what I say" and they do that well.
Another very good site from Kink that is recommended for those who are into this genre.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Women wrestling, clothed, partially clothed and nude. One of Kink's oldest sites.
- Has more content than I'll ever get to.
- Tag team live matches in front of a crowd are some of my favorite scenes in all of pornland.
- Working Isis Love in as ref and extra strap-on is a great idea. I could just watch her walk around.
- Scripted and non-scripted are very subjective words, but I will give them credit for being the most physical of the wrestling sites.
- Nice photo sets, but see the cons and BL for more on this.
- Download speeds are usually extremely good, but there was one day of 1/20th regular download speed and just today the site had a few maintenance issues.
- Dragon Lily. It's not just a site with her on it, but she's a real star here. One of the sexiest, curvy, Asian/Pacific Islander models I've ever seen.
- Get a discount to most of their other sites while a member, believe it's $19.95 on each one you add.
Cons:
- Site design. This doesn't just apply to Ultimate Surrender, but most of the Kink sites I've been on. Have a membership to two right now and both suffer from the same problems.
- Trying to find a balance. I've competed in martial arts, Greco Roman wrestling and mixed martial arts. Dragon Lily really stands out here because she seems to be very skilled in grappling and flexibility. The combination of athleticism and sexy is perfect with her. A lot of the matches end up being more like foreplay for a lesbian porn scene.
- And those mutli-zip photo sets. There is a reason and defined reason for this, round 1, round 2, round 3, round 4, but each one is only 10-20 MB and requires multiple clicks to download each. I have a round downloaded before I can get back and start another round's zips downloading.
Bottom Line:
I like Kink sites as a diversion for me. I've almost always liked only glam sites, solo sites, but Kink has me convinced they are "good guys" when it comes to hard, dominating sex and they are perfect for me when I start getting bored with the softer porn.
I do stay frustrated with the site design and the way the photo zips work. Kink does listen so I'm hoping they at least will consider this. To download one match's photos you have to go through this process, click on photos, click on which round, there are 4 rounds in each match, click on download zip, back click, click on round 2, click download, back click, click on round 3, click on download, back click, click on round 4, click download, back click. That's 12 clicks to get one full match's photos. If I'm wrong for complaining about that have Dragon Lily and Isis Love punish me!
This click-a-thon does make the photo sets less appealing to me. Maybe put a full set download link? Or how about even a little zip icon beside each round? Full set would allow one click downloading. Zip icon beside each would be 4 clicks. I could put up with 4, but 12 is just frustrating. Though not applying directly to this site, I've also seen other Kink sites using this multiple click per photo set download.
The site itself is believable to a point. Some of the girls look like they are giving their all to win a match, others look like they just want to lose and have sex. Dragon Lily, Isis Love are both very competitive in it and both are also funny. Sorry Lily, but you telling a woman, "You cannot cum yet" is funny to me and strangely, kind of cute.
The live matches are the standouts. These do seem to be a little less realistic from a competitive view, because they allow double teams, which are always fun. I won't criticize the site for being scripted though. Girls do get injured. Some matches stopped because of injury even.
Where the site succeeds the most. Quality, quantity and hard lesbian sex. I have always had problems watching the harder boy/girl scenes with slapping, but it's pretty hot when it's two sweating, naked women. I do now understand the scoring better than I did on my last review of this site and can see how they are trying to create a real athletic competition with erotic additions.
Video quality can be varied and confusing, which goes back to site design. These are the options on newer ones, Most Compatible (wmv), Highest Quality HD (mp4), Smaller Screens iPod, iPad (mp4), Windows Media HD (wmv). Some of the times, I have downloaded the most compatible option and gotten mid level wmv files in the 720x480 range. So I finally just selected Highest Quality mp4 and it will remember that from scene to scene, but because the site has so much content on it, some of the scenes highest quality mp4 is 640x360. That can be frustrating since on those, the wmv is usually 720x480. It would probably be way too much of a pain to list the resolution beside of each, but it should be mentioned since you have to check each file to see if you got the best quality one available for that scene.
Search could be improved. If you go to "All Seasons" there are 8 listed previous seasons, but they have started season 10. Most of all though, I would love to see an option to just select the live scenes, but it's not here unless I'm overlooking something. I instead go through the updates looking for ones I can see a crowd in. Sounds easy enough, but each page only lists 7 shoots and the live ones are released by round, so you have to dig even more to find the full live scenes and if you want the pictures to those, it's back to looking for each round. Why the full scene video download doesn't have a full scene photo zip download doesn't make much sense.
The Kink sites I have been on all have these different problems with photo sets being split up to maybe tell a story or make sure if you're not OCDC, you will be. The design and frustration has lowered my score from a 90 a few years ago, but if you're not interested in the photos, the score would be in the lower 90s.
Using my most basic method of figuring up how much content, I'm going to multiply the number of pages of updates multiplied by how many scenes per page. There are 84 pages of updates, 7 scenes per page, so that's 588, but the live ones are split, so the number isn't that high. The site has updates dating back to 2004, they update every week.
The live scenes are what brings me back though. Having Isis being more active as a ref, joining in the sex part has really helped the site. Her performance as an unknowing spectator in one live scene is my personal favorite scene of my porn collection.
It's different, it's the hardest lesbian content I've found and it even has some genuine laughs in it. Once you get beyond the site design problems and search issues, you have one of the most original sites on the internet. Recommended to those who are looking for something different and lesbian fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-13-1211:56pm (Update History) Reason: Was wrong about some of the sites that are included not being standalone sites. One can see the underlined ones. Those do come with a membership.
Pros:
- Interesting, large and somewhat exclusive studio DVD site.
- TBP discount pushed me to join, glad I did now.
- Good download speeds unless you download more than a couple files, once one finishes, the other still downloading files don't pick up the speed.
- Pictures with some of the scenes, come zipped, various sizes, most are in the 1280 long end range.
- Quite a bit of content I've not seen from their studio. As a semi-regular on Videobox, I usually check the Lethal Hardcore DVDs. Am happy from the standpoint of a collector since there are some here I've never seen.
- The site is confusing, will be in cons, but was feeling risky and found out there are more sites included with the membership. Though they do seem to just be separate genres, more so than actual separate sites.
- Large amount of content especially for the price.
- Newer scenes have HD option, will be more specific in BL.
Cons:
- Site is confusing. Bad confusing. They have six sites listed at the top of the main page besides Lethal Hardcore. Since I joined Lethal Hardcore, I figured this meant I would have to pay extra for the scenes on those sites. I took a chance and clicked download on one of the scenes from one of the other sites, it downloaded, no extra charges. This is a con because the site does sell itself, once a member, as a network of sites. I had no idea when joining it.
- Varying quality throughout the sites and the dreaded mislabeled file size. Here is a "high" .wmv file, listed as 780 MB, go to download it's 348 MB. I use those numbers to determine the quality, so this can be frustrating.
- Some scenes don't have pictures. Did I mention the confusion? Took me forever to find the zip download link. It was right in front of my eyes, but I kept looking over it. More my fault there, but could just be below average layout.
Bottom Line:
For the first time in about 4 years, I joined a site just because a handful of scenes I had seen on a TGP site with the Lethal Hardcore watermark on them. Anytime I have joined a site just for a handful of scenes, I've ended up disappointed. That's not the case here.
I want to reiterate how confusing this site can be. If I click Models ---> Abbey Brooks, it shows me 1 available scene on Lethal Hardcore. Below that scene it says, "Videos from Network Sites" and has five more videos of Abbey. Well, of course, this just pissed me off at first since I figured I was going to click one and it would say, "You need to join this site to see this video". But it didn't. I looked up at the url of the video on the "other" site and it was lethalmembers, so these other sites are included. These are the sites, I do see that none of these sites are listed as standalone sites so that's why I believe they are just Lethal Hardcore videos from different genres. HDVids, TeenGirls, MatureWomen, ExploitedExGF, Tranny.com and GayUltra. Some are very small as well so I have no reason to think they are standalone sites.
These are the numbers they advertise.
143,842 videos, 9,104 DVDs, 31,908 Stars, 3,256 HD Videos. They also have a streaming only "user submitted videos" section.
After that it gets a little confusing again. The site listed as HDVids, which you do have access to has 231 pages of 30 DVDs on each page. That's close to 7,000 DVDs and from the best I can tell you can access them all. I'm not going to go through all 7,000 to be positively sure, but I have been able to download the ones I have tried. These videos are very similar to what you will find on the other DVD sites, you'll see Teen Pink Visual all the way to the more obscure studios with generic names like "German Fucking".
This is not a bad thing to me. When I have the time, I have found quite a few older scenes that I have looked for for years. Here's the good news.
Despite all the confusing, the site works. It has a "favorites" button on every model and your favorites can be accessed from the toolbar at the top of the screen. Videobox veterans know the frustrations members have faced with the favorites being messed up. The site also has a clean interface when looking for certain models. It also lets you search by DVD series, so if you like their Hot Bods and Tail Pipes series you can pull just those videos up.
Once you get over the initial confusion, you find out that this site is a very good site. It has separate tabs to search for scenes, you can then whittle it down to search by newest to oldest updates or you can change your mind and search by entire DVDs. I mean no offense to their webmaster, but considering the early confusion, I kind of got the feeling someone was putting this site together and accidentally got it right.
They have a little bit of everything in the Lethal Hardcore DVD series' from Cougars Crave Kittens to My Stepdaughter Tossed My Salad. We eating or watching porn? Seriously, the series' are ones most porn fans are familiar with. I'm almost certain they don't have all their DVDs here. I have always liked the Hot Bods and Tail Pipe series. When I look at that series specifically it makes me think they have a lot of their DVDs here because they have 30 full DVDs just in that series. That alone is around 120-130 scenes just under Hot Bods and Tail Pipe.
I do wish they had more pictures especially with the older sets. I want to say most of the newer DVDs have pictures, but I'm just going to say "some" do. It reminds me somewhat of ZTOD in that respect. You also do have the option to view just picture sets. These have 1024px and 1600px download options.
Video quality, I was hoping to be able to be very specific on how many HD DVDs they have, but they don't have dates stamped on the DVDs to tell when they posted them. I can tell you this, they have over 120 Lethal Hardcore DVDs with HD option. I want to say that's roughly 25-30% of the DVDs in HD. The high option is not bad at all on the others. It's 720x480 with 2000 bitrate. From my experience on DVD sites, I would say they are about average or equal to other DVD sites in overall quality.
What lifts them up are those obscure ones. The rare (Model name) scene that you've never seen before and there are lots of those for me. It's not a best in class site, but it's near the best in the class known as, "I've already got everything from the best in class site".
The price makes it even better. One warming. We have all fell for missing a cross-sale when joining, but this site as well as Fame Digital and a couple others have been the first ones to use the checked cross-sale way over on the side of your screen method. It's over near your right boundary. Started at 89 on this site, dropped it to 86 for that. With that warning in mind, I do recommend this site as an alternative DVD site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that surprised me in the Club Sandy network.
- Picture sets as are on par with all 21st Sextury sets top out at 1280, but as with their other sites are usually erotic and feature warm colors if you're into the warm colors like I am.
- I'm not going to say 100% sure, but I think this content is 100% exclusive. More in BL
- Videos have multiple options, including up to HD quality in the last year or so of updates.
- Maybe I get a more natural feel from these sets than from other lesbian sites. The majority of the girls look very young and are playful with each other to the point of being experimental.
- My near jaded state to network sites nearly made me miss this site as I thought it was just another thrown together with shared content site, but it's not. Also check the site Cuties Galore (same network) to see these young models in b/g sets.
Cons:
- Picture size needs a boost to at least 2000 high end. It's a compliment!
- As with any and all lesbian sites or any site that focuses on one niche, things can get a bit repetitive and formulaic.
- Strictly a con for me, some of these models just look TOO young.
Bottom Line:
I usually won't review a site within a network unless I think it could be one that would appeal to certain niche fans. This is one of them.
The models here are ones I am not very familiar with. On most 21st Sextury lesbian sites you will see the normal top tier models like Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Sandy etc...
Not on this one. These look to be genuine very young, 18-21 year old models who I was only familiar with maybe 8-9 of them. In total, the site has 172 models. I'm thinking at most, I may be familiar with 10% of them before downloading their content from here.
Site numbers as of 8-2-10
312 videos
312 photo sets
Pictures are zipped and contain the 21st Sextury style of photography we've come to expect.
I am, admittedly, a fan of the 24-34 year old models more so than the teens. I prefer the curvier, more built look to slim and skinny. But, if you're looking for the slim, very young looking models this is the site for you. There are positives and negatives to this.
Positives include a believable genuinely playful feel to the sets in the first 5 minutes or so of the videos. I also think it is believable that women this young and possibly inexperienced in girl/girl action could lose a little control and go more into the taboo action. That's what you get here. There is a lot of anal play between the girls. In a fully complimentary way, most of these videos remind me of when Viv Thomas first started putting a young Eve Angel with a young Sandra Shine and the two seemed to lose control with each other. Very good.
The negative, some of the girls are understandably shy and innocent acting and some of them don't leave that shy and innocent part by the end of the movie. Maybe it does give it more of a real feel, but it doesn't make for the most entertaining videos unless you're into that.
I was probably most impressed by the model simply known as Ashley. She's a tiny little thing. Cute girl, looks like you could have taken her to the prom and this girl just lets go in her scenes, anal, dildos, fisting the other girls and I swear, I would ID her since she looks so young. The updates can be frustrating as it is one of the 21st Sextury sites that does the one piece released each day, then the full video is released once a week, but even so, over 300 sets including accompanying photo set is pretty good for a "network" site.
This site has made me go back and join through the 21st Sextury site instead of joining through Club Sandy since you get it and Cuties Galore in your first month of the 21st Sextury join. Cuties Galore seems to have almost the same models as from Lez Cuties except they are doing b/g scenes. I'm impressed, I rarely go for the small, waif like models, but it looks like 21st Sextury has hit the jackpot with some of these models. I won't review Cuties Galore since it is very similar except for style of content, but would definitely recommend checking out both of these sites in the network as two partially hidden gems.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Return to a nice priced ($14.95) site that has improved...some.
- I really don't want to go into their numbers, over 1,000 sites in the network? It is true, but some have 5 videos in them. Having said that, there is a ton of content here.
- I think the quality is good enough, wmv high end up to 720, 2000 bitrate
- New "demand a format" on all videos, click the format you would prefer the video in and they will change it over, .wmv is default, and they have 5 or 6 options that you can switch that to
- There are some really interesting "solo" sites popping up here with some rare content, will explain in BL
- The navigation has improved, but the search engine is still a pain to use. You no longer sign in on every site, just the main one. Then switch from site to site with a simple click.
Cons:
- That search engine, it works, but for example, if you search Eva Angelina, the first 7 results will be Eva Angelina, then the next 100 won't be, then all of a sudden another Eva scene pops up.
- This site really needs to go on a diet. What I mean is, forget that big number of sites available, combine those niche sites into one! They have 8 handjob sites. Put them on one big site, what I really dislike is that I saw several videos on multiple sites, same video, different site, same network. That is number inflation.
- Download speeds vary, sometimes I get a steady average speed, other times, I am about 25% below average for my connection.
Bottom Line:
I shocked myself when I joined this site again. My OCDC hates this site with a passion. But I'm happy to say that they have cleaned it up some. There are still some problems, but those problems, in my opinion, are outweighed by the improvements.
Check out some of these solo sites, number of videos in parenthesis, Briana Banks (20), My Dear Sandy from Club Sandy (15), My Dear Anetta Keys (8), Anna Dagostini (25), Carmella Bing (14), Lanny Barbie (13), Nautica Thorn (16), Gianna Michaels (8), Britney Skye (16), Eva Angelina (18), and that is about half of these!
Now, I can tell you that these are not all exclusive, but even the Eva Angelina clips, which I have over 150 clips of Eva, 8 of them, I didn't have.
Keep that in mind, because the site is only $15 and 720 high end with 2000 bitrate is good quality. Then look at a few of these numbers.
Handjob sites (8) total videos on those (309), that is a ton of handjob porn clips, especially considering that the average handjob porn DVD has 10 scenes, that is equal to 30 DVDs.
The network is impressive in that sense and when looking at the quality. I haven't needed to use the customer service, but the same folks that run DVD Box run this site and they are really good with the service on DVD Box, so I would imagine they are here as well.
You will get frustrated with this network. You will cuss the search engine, but there is a lot of very good to excellent content on here. Those Sandy videos for example, I have every video of Sandy from her Club Sandy site, every video of her on 1byday and every video of her on Sandy's Fantasies, and those licensed videos that appear on Twistys and Teen Dreams, but all but 2 of those 16 videos were new to me. Looks to be when Sandy was younger, pre-implants.
Most of all, I do compliment them for at least making the site less cluttered and confusing. They changed the layout of the site, the way it works, and now there at least the feeling of organization.
A few more numbers that they advertise, 1,436 sites in the network, 13,038 scenes, 4,076,925 GBs of content and my favorite 3,920 hours of porn! So, if you downloaded the whole site and watched 1 hour or porn daily, you would have enough new porn for 11 years HA!
It really has improved, I like the option of changing the file to whatever format you prefer, here are those options, .vob, .3gp, .divx, .flv, .mov, .mp4, .mpg and Ipod. So you can't complain about their options, though you do have to wait for them to convert those from .wmv. And to be honest, I don't know how long it takes. I put one in and after 24 hours, it hadn't converted.
Last, the my favorites finally works, so you can browse and save clips to download as you go. They also now have 8 exclusive sites, that to me look like previews of other pay sites. One is Hustler and it has a small amount of Hustler videos you can download.
I'm recommending it, the navigation improvements, high quality for a DVD site, is worth $15!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Boobs, boobs, and more boobs, it is like being a bra maker
- Nice trial price that I let rebill for one month, and am pleased even with paying for a full month
- Rachel is reason enough to join, then you add Eva Angelina, Jenaveve Jolie, and boobs, boobs and more boobs and you get the picture.
- Videos are good quality, though there is some variation in quality depending on age, newest videos are HD
- Pictures come in zips, but I have ran into a few that came up empty, fixed this problem by using winrar instead of winzip and renamed each file to .rar instead of .zip or the webmaster mistake of .htm
- Download speeds were very fast for me
- Includes access to 3 other sites, though I spent most of my time on this one.
Cons:
- Damn independent billing, talk about driving my obsessive compulsiveness up the wall. I checked my email probably 10 times just to make sure I had canceled.
- Kind of more softcore than I was expecting. Most of the women on this site are in very hardcore movies, so I thought this would be the same.
- Boobs, boobs, and more boobs can get boring after awhile.
- Those webmaster mistakes that I mentioned in naming the zip files.
Bottom Line:
Rachel Aziani is a beautiful, big boobed model and here she brings along a bunch of her big boobed friends.
One model that I hadn't heard of that I really fell for on here is Mariah Milano, then you throw in all the ones I knew of, and overall, you have to like the overall selection and variety. Though they all have big boobs. Not all are natural though.
The movies look good, even the lower quality ones, and the HD movies look great as expected. Only thing is, I really don't know that I will keep a lot of these HD videos from this site.
The pictures are high resolution and zipped, but you will run into some zips that are named wrong, and if you don't fix it, you won't have any pictures.
The bonus sites weren't that great. Raquel is a little too far up the "older" meter for my tastes. Plus the quality is much lower. Amber is pretty, love her eyes, but again, a drop off in quality and even Rachel's solo site has a drop off in quality from Aziani.com.
Oh and the kink site isn't working for me. "Tickle" fetish? What the hell? I can think of at least 5 other things I want to see a woman do before being tickled, and no, I don't really believe balloons are real fetish, especially when the women have DD boobs.
I would join just for Aziani.com, and did not take anything off the score for the bonus sites. Definitely would recommend the trial for pretty much anyone into porn, 1 month is recommended as well, but the trial could be enough for some to get the top models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- More from Kelly Madison, more of a hardcore site, with higher quality
- Videos are 640 high end, but unlike Kelly's solo site, this one has 1500+ bitrate, much better
- Download speeds are also better on this site, about 25% above average for me
- Sex is very believable, and there are some really great models that join the husband/wife threesomes, Sienna being my favorite
- Pictures of each video, but see cons
- Some sets don't have Kelly in them, which can be a good thing just to break up the repetitiveness.
Cons:
- They boosted bitrate on the videos, but no zip downloads on the pictures. Go figure.
- Still is repetitive, similar content to Kelly's solo site
- $29.95 is too much for what equals just a video site
- The biggest part of the models on this site are just like Kelly in build, just like on her solo site, big boobs, small waist and butt
- After a month of this and Kelly's solo site you really become very bored with the whole wife/husband having threesomes niche
Bottom Line:
This site for me is the best of the 413 Productions sites. I do think they should package the three together for $30. This site is almost identical to Kelly's solo site except the videos have a better bitrate. It is still the same storyline, husband and wife looking for a younger women to join them in a threesome.
There are a few clips that do not have Kelly or her husband in them, and that is probably a saving grace, since it does break up the repetitive nature, same couple, same storyline that Kelly's solo site has.
As mentioned in the cons, still no hi-resolution pictures and this time, they don't even offer zip downloads. High bitrates, high resolution pictures, downloadable zips for pictures is a $30 site. This really isn't, and I would recommend the trial over a full month membership because of that.
Kelly and her husband are both very good performers, both seem to enjoy the sex and with the added hotter models on this one, they get a higher score here than on Kelly's solo site. The model Sienna is really sexy in an exotic way.
Download speeds are plenty good enough, the navigation is very simple, point, click, go. Some known pornstars here as well. Which isn't a bad thing, but it reminds you that Kelly isn't really an amateur, which does take away from the storyline of husband/wife looking to have as many threesomes as possible, just because they love sex.
I recommend it for a month only. The content is what it says it is, and they do it well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A 4 site network all based on 4 individual models
- Quality is mind-blowing, will breakdown by site in BL
- Photos are 5000+ and are available in zips
- Videos are all over 700 on high end, some even go up to 1200+ and 5000+ bitrate!
- If you buy them together, you get all 4 for $24.95, $14.95 if you buy them separately
- All 4 models are what I would call 5 out of 5 stars, beautiful, great at posing, so if you are looking for girl next door types, this isn't for you.
- Download speeds are excellent at 1300 kb/s on a 10M connection
- Even the layouts of the sites are very pretty, easy on the eyes.
Cons:
- Videos are very tame
- Almost every set is outdoors, not all of us dream of being on a tropical beach with a woman.
- Amount of content, even with all 4 sites combined, you get around 16 videos, very short videos at that and the picture sets total a little over 100.
- The content is not exclusive to these sites. I know the content is exclusive to the company, but some of these sets also appear on Watch4Beauty
- The women in my dreams do more than these do! It is a con, it is named "dreams for you" we're going to need about 15 minutes added to those videos for my dreams.
Bottom Line:
A very interesting network that should at least attract those who love high quality with their porn. The pictures are some of the biggest on the internet. These are so big that you can count the number of pubic hairs the model missed. The video quality is also off the charts impressive, when you start talking about 5000+ bitrates, it makes my computer drool that it will finally put its power to good use.
Then the video stops. Where is the rest of it? Do yourself a favor before joining, learn the definition of "erotic". It would have helped me a lot. Erotic - Tending to arouse sexual desire.
Doesn't say anything about satisfying sexual desire. Also remember that dreams always end right before the good part! The only other real complaint I have is the outdoor sets. I like those as much as anyone, but everything needs to be in moderation. I would like to see more of these women inside, rolling around on a bed as example.
The stats for the sites are all impressive. The lowest "high" videos I found were on Nikky's Dreams at 700+x500+ 3000+ bitrate, the other 3 have near 1300x700+ 5000+ bitrate. I just checked for exact numbers. Total videos on the 4 sites = 17. Total picture sets of the 4 sites = 110. Bad news for me is my favorite of the 4 is Monika and she has the least amount of content of the 4.
I can recommend it if you love high quality content. Note, the pictures are not ultra soft, you do get full spread here. Recommended for one month only!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Pretty big and cheap $14.95 video site, over 2,000 DVDs
- The biggest plus for me is the older content that includes over 10 Adrianne Sage scenes, and several other models that most DVD sites don't have much material of.
- Quality of video is around average 570 on high end, bitrate needs to be improved as it is only 1000k
- Updates are consistent
- Site navigation is pretty much click and go
Cons:
- That bitrate of 1000k is really starting to chug when watched on a high end computer, after watching ones over 2,000k.
- Not as many video of newer actresses, only 3 Eva Angelina clips?
- Plenty of clunkers amongst the 2,000+ DVDs
- Once you have been on here for a month there really isn't much reason to come back for 6 months or so.
Bottom Line:
This was the last of my DVD sites for this month. I won't say it is disappointing, but it doesn't measure up to the top DVD sites, really isn't that close either. If you like late 90s porn better than the new stuff you can at least get more of it here than any other site I have been on, which is one thing that really helps this site.
They have some strange videos as well, trannies seem to be normal these days on DVD sites, but also on here, the midget series. I do like that they also have a nice sized collection of Euro porn. You would be surprised how many of those Euro models who are just posing and doing solo now, are popping up in these slightly older Euro DVDs.
I like the older stuff, mid to late 90s, and if you do as well, it would be worth checking this site out. I also really like the navigation. You can search by series, studio, new releases and pornstar. Then you can go to the model index where they have what looks to be a 200x200 avatar of each porn star so you can get a good look at her.
It is the little things also that help this site at least be worth the money. I wish the video quality was a little better, if nothing else, higher bitrates. The resolution is near 600 on the high end so that isn't too bad. While I wouldn't join it more than maybe 1 time every 6 months, I will be coming back and making it a normal site for my porn site rotation. Check the excellent preview out to see the content they have. Recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A pretty good network site that has a little of everything, solo, hardcore and so on.
- The old famous, "Amateur" claim, though maybe these were filmed before the girls were stars? Sandra Shine is the first video listed on here, by her old stage name, Judit.
- Quality varies depending on age of clip, everything except the first 5 videos are available in full scene download, there are also pictures on the majority of the sets.
- Naughty's clean site design
- DL speeds are above average
Cons:
- Basic site design could be a turnoff for some.
- Some of the older sets do not have full scene downloads
- Most of the content, as with most sites like this one becomes repititive
- Living in So Cal all of my life, but have never seen any of these women!
Bottom Line:
I wasn't as happy with this site as I expected to be. This has been a site I have always heard of and meant to join many times. The network helps the site out and makes it a good value to join, but this site couldn't make it on its own.
The navigation is very basic. Page that lists all the models and a thumbnail. There are several options, especially on the newer sets like MPEG or WMV, different bitrates. Also each set has interview and masturbation clips available.
The girls are you typical, very pretty and young types. Sandra Shine is on here as Judy, but when you download it, it says, "Judit". Most of the models are known porn stars, Kelli Kline, Karina Kay, and one of my personal favorites, Jersey Jaxon. Heck, they even have Mia Bangg on here, seems like she has been in porn forever, so I really think they went way overboard with the amateur pitch.
The quality on the last 20 movies is 720x540 2000kbps, before that, the previous 50 or so are available in full scene downloads as well, but are lower quality MPEGs. Only 5 of the videos are not available in full scene downloads. I'm not for sure if they went back and made full scenes out of some of the old ones, but I had noticed the TBP review says there is no full scene download, but from my count around 95% are available in full scene downloads.
The site is a nice addition to the network, but I found it to be maybe the 4th or 5th best of the network, definitely not the best. Still recommended with network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Anette Dawn has one of the most charming personalties in porn and easily one of the best bodies as well.
- Pictures are 1240 on high end, come in zips as well and look great, similar to the newer content on sister site, twistys.
- Videos are 720x404, widescreen monitor makes them look even better, over 2000 bitrate
- Content is exclusive, will explain in BL.
- Navigation, visual appeal of the site, are both top-notch.
Cons:
- Amount of content may be a problem for some, as of October 1st, 27 picture sets and 18 videos.
- Going to be a little nitpicky here and say the candid, non-nude pictures should just be in one set together.
- All content is of Anette only, no g/g, no b/g and no friends, not that I have a problem with that, but could be a con for some.
Bottom Line:
I have been wanting to join this site since back in May. Anette just has "that something" that people talk about when trying to separate beautiful people from each other.
Her personality shines through on this site more than any content I have seen of her. She comes off as more confident, she actually looks a little shy in her older content on other sites. Her masturbation has never been a strong point. I've seen videos of her where she barely even moans, but not here, she is into it and getting the job done, thank you very much!
Videos are new, not the ones on Twistys. Also picture sets look to be new, but I can't say 100% exclusive since the outfits look similar. Only problem there, a couple of non-nude candid sets are in the 30 picture range, which is why I believe those sets could be combined as a best of candids. But I understand the business and the more picture sets you can advertise the better.
The thing is, I don't think out of all sites that have Anette on them, have this much content when combined! The 18 videos at 12 to 15 minutes would make 2, maybe 3 DVDs of just Anette.
The site is updating regularly from what I can see. Four pic sets and two videos per month. She could be one of the top 3 Euros in the world if she had more material coming out. Still, I won't complain, I'm very happy with what I downloaded and would recommend it to any Anette fan. For me, it will be a once every 6 months site until the content gets built up. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent amount of exclusive material, especially photos of some of the best models in the world.
- Videos are good quality, not excellent, but good enough
- More models than a deranged porno perv could ever browse
- Some material that I would call Classic, remember Savannah? Believe she has since left us, gorgeous blonde.
- You get a little of everything, beautiful, average, exotics, older, teen, b/g, g/g, solo
Cons:
- The amount of models actually becomes frustrating.
- Thumbnailed pictures of models are small, some names have as many as a dozen models with the same names, but I can't tell much from the tiny thumbs.
- I hate to knock price, but I also knock ATK for their price and this site reminds me of ATK Galleria
- A pet peeve from ATK as well, having to download 5 zips to get one set of pics.
Bottom Line:
Hard to believe that I had never been a member on Karups PC before. I had to try it out since they have exclusive material of my favorite models. The content is good, but could be better. I get almost a feeling a Deja Vu from ATK Galleria when on Karups PC. Which could be good thing, since I consider Karups to be a very good site, but a bad thing because I think there is a lot of material that could be put on a shelf or an archive page to make the pages less cluttered with tiny thumbs.
I haven't watched many of the videos, but the quality of the ones I have watched are acceptable. I don't really expect a site that has this much content to have HD, I am at least realistic and know that these guys are working on improving the site. The model index, which from reading other reviews is a new feature and it is very helpful. My main problem came in when I started looking for models that I know go by different names on sites. Then I had to start trying to find with the scroll button on my mouse, going through thumbnails.
Overall, I like the site and the fact that they are improving it. Maybe a new menu item called, "Classic" to move the sets from the 90s to, so the pages wouldn't be so cluttered? I mention this because I have vision problems in one eye that makes it hard for me to focus on a small thumbnail.
I would recommend it the same way I do ATK. There is tons of content you probably haven't seen before on here, especially if you are a collector of certain models!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
