Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older women take over Nubiles.
- High production values and has a classy side to it.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max)
- Epoch is the biller.
- A total of 672 models with all having more than one video and more than one photoset.
- Nearly 3,000 scenes, some of the videos don’t have an accompanying photoset.
- 11 updates in the last 7 days. They have been averaging more than 1 update per day.
Cons:
- It has been a con on this site for a long time, the definition of what makes a woman a “mature” model. There are models in their 20’s on the site. That’s not a con for me as those mid to late 20’s into their 30’s models are my favorites.
- I have said this about every site this company runs, the scenes can be very boring and dull, generic, bland.
Bottom Line:
At one time, I considered this site a mid to high 90’s but similar to their younger models site, Nubiles.net, it has lost some of its appeal. I don’t know how much has changed in terms of management of this company’s sites but something changed. It wasn’t for the best.
The main type of porn you will find here is solo. It’s nice seeing solo models that aren’t “barely legal” or not old enough to legally drink alcohol. It has been my belief for a long time thanks mainly to FTV MILFs, that the models over 30 are more confident, comfortable and make better solo videos. It’s a genre I was spoiled on. With models like Eve Angel and Sophie Moone, that could control and capture the viewer’s eyes with their eyes.
Which is why I lowered the score on this site. I don’t get that from their newer content. I’m going to share an opinion that may not be the right one to share. Of their 20 most recent models, I found 2 of them attractive. We’re running into something that we used to wonder about. What will tattooed women look like when they get older? It’s something I’m not apologizing about since I pay to look at women I find attractive. They just aren’t bringing the attractive ones in like they used to. The two I like from the past 20 are Anastasia Ocean and Frida Sante. I’m not familiar with either but they are 30 and 34 respectively. One of the most unusual for me is a recent model named Ella Brown, not only is she not attractive to me she’s only 20. Maybe Covid has hurt their workflow or ability to find models?
There’s nothing to complain about with the site itself. They update as often as anyone currently. They have 270p to 1080p downloads on their videos. Their picture sets are large, professional and are often better than the videos. I’ve said it before, you can have all the technical parts right but if the models aren’t attractive to the viewer nothing else really matters.
The site is huge though with nearly 3,000 videos and 2,000 photosets. The older content and models were much better at least for me and that’s what tempers my lowering of the score. It has good scenes on it. I just haven’t seen many good ones in the newer ones. If you have been a member lately, you might want to take a tour and look over the newest updates before joining. I know we’re all different and respect that. If you’re into slightly older women than most porn has these days it’s probably worth your time to check this site out. I’ll end with the part about the ages. The models here range from 20 to 50’s. I rarely find any of the 40+ year old models that attractive and feel like that’s why I don’t like the newer content as well. A lot of these newer models are older, it’s not unusual to see overweight and large, saggy boobs. One of the newer models is 46 with natural 36H boobs. She has a pretty face but the overall look doesn’t do anything for me. It’s still a good site with my pickiness being the only legitimate complaint.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest Latina porn sites on the internet and they have remastered a decent amount of the old content.
- 350 scenes with 210 different Latina models.
- Large amount of scenes featuring some of my favorite models (see bottom line).
- Updated until 2018, since then the updates have been remastered old scenes with many of those being from 2004-2008.
- Had what I remember being the first 4K scenes I had seen (January 1st, 2014).
- Very good download speeds (85% my max)
- Epoch is the biller.
Cons:
- Being new to 4K, I assume the remastered versions can’t be remastered to 4K.
- I never understood why they stopped updating the site but the remasters are a nice touch especially for collectors.
Bottom Line:
One of the first Latina sites I remember joining. It was underwhelming back then since the scenes were often cut into parts. The oldest scenes are from 2004 to give you an idea of how long this site has been around. It does seem like they should have more scenes based on that but I do think they stopped updating it multiple times then restarted.
The remasters are worth a membership. The new remastered versions have 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads and they are full scenes not the 3-4 part scenes. The models are a major bonus for Latina collectors too. Luna Star, Yurizan Beltran, Jynx Maze, Adrianna Luna, Esperanza Gomez, one of my absolute favorites before she became a dominatrix on Kink, Isis Love and quite a few often forgotten favorites like Monique Fuentes, Nadia Lopez, Gigi Loren, Miya Stone, Sofia Rivera, Sadie Santos and two of my favorite but hard to find models, Selena Santana and Isabella de Santos. This paragraph alone was worth the price of a membership.
There are right at 350 scenes with the newer ones either being remasters or the 4 years of new updates that feature 4K videos. There is no extra charge for the 4K videos. They also mix in a few VR scenes too.
If the site has one fault and it has been a fault since the site started it’s that the scenes have very little connection to adultery. You won’t even know what the situation is unless you read the synopsis on the scenes. There’s very little discussion in the scenes about, “my wife is at work” or the Latina saying her husband is at work. It relies heavily on stereotypes as well. Wealthy man hires a Latina maid or interior designer then she makes the moves on him to get to his money. It’s not a big distraction or negative. It just shows how well or how poorly these scenes have aged. Luckily, with remastering, the models look as young as ever. Which is a positive, you’ll see some scenes of well-known models earlier in their career in HD. I sometimes forget how energetic these models were.
The navigation is only okay. For one, they have a block ad every 3 lines of scenes. They also make it a little more difficult than it should be to download scenes. It’s a simple fix. When you click on a scene there is no clear download area or button. There’s a save button which could make you think that’s the download button but it’s not. That will just save the scene to your favorites. There’s 10 text ads for cams down the right of the screen. Then there’s a “more info” button which I don’t think anyone would ever expect to find the downloads at. That’s where the downloads are. Once you open the more info box there’s the downloads and the synopsis. It’s like they tried to make the site have a cleaner, less-cluttered look but instead of getting rid of the ads, they hid the downloads in a box that expands when clicked on.
Once you figure that out there doesn’t seem to be any download limits of any kind and you can download all your old favorite scenes in remastered HD. All of the old scenes aren’t remastered but I have noticed they slip some remasters in without listing them as new updates. They only show one new remaster in October but I’m counting 7. There’s a fair trade-off here. While the scenes don’t have the best production values they do have some of the sexiest models from the last 20 years in all their hip-grinding, jiggly butts Latina glory.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the kinkiest porn I have ever watched
- Lots of fetishes from feet to bondage to machine manipulation.
- Pretty models for this type of porn. I don’t recognize them.
- Is another of the mini-networks from Porn Doe. Has 3 sites included with it.
- Segpay is the biller and they’ve helped me out of 3 problems in recent months.
- The look on my face while watching these scenes. Not to mention the newfound ways to use curse words.
- Good but small network to give you something different than what you’re used to.
Cons:
- It’s just very small with only 63 scenes across the 3 sites.
- This would be a really nice addition to any of the other Porn Doe mini-networks.
- Jokes on them, they have a 100 download limit on this network but it only has 63 scenes.
Bottom Line:
It takes a lot to get me to review a 63 scene network. If you haven’t read my other reviews about Porn Doe breaking their sites up into mini-networks that’s what this is. For Bondage consists of 3 sites, they are: Crowd Bondage with 25 scenes, Badtime Stories with 30 scenes and Special Feet Force with 8 scenes. None of these sites have updated since around the time Coronavirus arrived. It’s a mini-network like this one that makes their $50 all network pass a better deal. To join For Bondage is $15 by itself. Which isn’t a bad price. I think if you’re into weird and fetish content you would probably download all 63 scenes.
Crowd Bondage is very reminiscent of Kink’s Public Disgrace. They take a woman, tie her up and a group of men and even women take turns having sex with her while a group stands around and watches. Some of these are outdoors. Public Disgrace is one of my favorite sites so I do like this site too. I don’t think this site is as big on the disgrace part as Public Disgrace is. It’s a good site overall, but it is a small site too with only 25 scenes.
Badtime Stories reminds me of if you took the dark Joker from Batman and turned him loose to shoot porn. It’s common for the participants to have on face paint, costumes, strange haircuts and hair colors. There is fisting, there are scenes with the woman in a pillory with a gag in her mouth. Some of this could be disturbing to viewers. One scene has a metal clip clipped to the woman’s bottom lip, a chain goes from it to her clitoris. So, if she lifts her head it stretches her clitoris. It looks like stuff you would see in the movie Saw.
The smallest site on this network, Special Feet Force, might be the best. This also makes me think of the dark Joker from Batman. There are women tied up, tickled until they pee on themselves, sometimes still in their clothes but what makes this one different is there’s almost always a third person. The scenes start out with the “torturer” and the “victim”. The third person is supposed to be like a brainwashed sex slave. The mistress or dominatrix commands the sex slave what to do to the tied up victim. It can be licking her dirty feet. It can be having sex with her while she’s tied up. They’re onto something with this small mini-network and this site probably shows it best. It only has 8 scenes as of right now.
I’m trying to cover the main mini-networks Porn Doe has created. I’m mainly doing it because I felt like the $50 all-network pass was a pretty good deal. I think the best way to look at it is if you like two of the mini-networks, those would cost $15 each and a mini-network like this For Bondage one could be the one to push you towards getting the all-network pass. I personally liked three of the mini-networks, Mamacitaz, Amateur Euro and VIP Sex Vault, joining each of those separately would cost $45. Which makes this For Bondage only $5. I also believe more people would like the Lets Doe It mini-network than I did. It has a few other mini-networks with it too including a transsexual one, Doe Girls which reminds me kind of Wow Girls and Hot Babes Plus. It almost feels like they’re justified in charging $50 for all these mini-networks.
Here on For Bondage they show they are willing to push the limits. They are tying models up to old medieval devices with what looks like 200-300 pound strength chains, turning the crank which pulls the model’s arms or legs. I said this several times while watching scenes, “This is some crazy shit.” I felt like Lawrence Fishburne. The “acting” in the scenes is very good. For Bondage has subtitles as well even though I’m not for sure they’re that good at translating.
For Bondage has scenes you would want to check out if you joined the all-network pass just because I don’t think anyone is doing this type of porn. Even their Crowd Bondage site which is a direct ripoff of Kink’s Public Disgrace really is better than a lot of the Public Disgrace scenes. It’s a good thing in porn when the viewer is most upset that you’re not updating. I haven’t said that in a long time but when someone complains there’s not enough content it’s because they like the content and want to see more of it.
The video quality is the same as their other sites and mini-networks. No 4K but they do have 1080p and 720p plus mobile versions. They have the 100 download limit PER network so that doesn’t carry over. A month of the all-network pass gives you around 1,000 downloads total. Fun mini-network all-around that just needs to get back into producing new updates or combine it with one of the other mini-networks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A girl, a couch and a guy trying her out to see if she's porn material.
- As good as other casting sites and as bad as other casting sites. The scenes are sometimes really good, other ones you're just going to skip after a few minutes.
- 297 scenes with 1 update per month.
- Decent blend of model types, all are in the 18-24 age range, but there are some Latina, some black models and nearly all are very attractive.
- I don't know hardly any of these models. I say it often, I am not up to date on newer models, except for the biggest stars. These might be mostly amateurs. They are to me.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max). No download limits.
- They do work some change into the scenes so every scene doesn't play out exactly the same like most casting sites do and I will go further on that in the BL.
- Excellent navigation.
Cons:
- The whole story to these scenes is these women want to be in porn.
- What I consider an amateur mistake in porn. The females spend a lot of time looking at the camera even during the sex, especially the ones that know they are pretty. I always found that distracting and even annoying.
- The good, the bad and the ugly comes out when they talk to the models before the sex parts. It probably could be called the, "Whether I'm going to like her or not."
Bottom Line:
Casting Couch X unlike other sites belonging to this group doesn't offer up to 4K on every scene. They do offer something I've not seen a lot on casting couch porn sites. They go pick the girl up which often leads to the driver either touching, fingering, or coercing the model to show him some skin while they're driving. That alone helps the site with me. You could put the worst porn scene in the history of porn in public and I would like it.
One thing I always look at when it comes to Casting sites is the length of the scene. This tells you if it's going to be a scene where the guy walks in and the sex starts or if they're going to talk some (which can be good or bad depending on the woman). Most of these scenes are at least 45 minutes so you're going to get long scenes.
There are downloadable photos but I didn't list them in pros or cons since they're kind of in the middle. The first 10-15 photos are just of the model. Which is good. I think these casting sites should have at least 50 photos of just the model. The rest of the photos are taken like screencaps of the action even though they have screencaps too. You're getting about 15 photos with each scene. There could be better focus on these photos, not focus as in camera lens but what they show. I'm still surprised by how few porn producers realize some people like seeing the woman dressed before seeing her naked. There's not enough of that in these photos to list them as a pro. I especially think when they're doing the parts in the car there should be more photos of that. Most will have 2-4 photos from the car part.
While you do get some diversity in the race of the models, most are slender to medium build.
This site differs from the other sites this company has in the upgrade package. The download formats are kind of peculiar, especially on the older scenes. The oldest scenes have an "Original WMV" version this is a 1080p version with the watermark down in the bottom right corner. They also have a 750 watermarked version. This is a 750x422 version that also has the same watermark. The WMV version doesn't say watermarked but is. They also have 1280 watermark version which is a 1080p version that has, in my opinion, outrageous bitrates at over 14,000, making the files over 5 GB each.
There's a little inconsistency too. The newest videos have some without a 4K option. While others have 4K. Most of the videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. But I still don't understand the oldest ones listing a 1080p video as 1280.
This doesn't take away from the site. It just makes you be careful about what you download since a lot of those older videos are massive in file size. I have always heard a good bitrate for 1080p is 8,000, the only way it should be up there in the 14,000 range is if it's more than 30 frames per second, these are 30 frames per second so nearly double the bitrate that is needed.
There are a total of 294 models and there are scenes with two girls in them.
I would definitely recommend it for those that like casting couch scenes. I wish I knew if these models are amateurs. There's one named Anissa that looks quite a bit like Anissa Kate and looks like if it is the well-known porn star it was early in her career. They don't list any last names which would help a lot. The scenes are enjoyable unless the woman is annoying (about 10% of the scenes). One of the better casting couch sites I've been on as long as you don't let those older videos strange listings throw you off.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Probably my favorite Japanese niche, the teacher and her student(s).
- 323 scenes that are all worth downloading if you're a fan of this niche and the various sub-niches it includes.
- Has a mixture of gender roles (see BL as it's a key pro).
- There are some HD scenes but no way to separate them. My feeling continues on these rare niches, the quality isn't as big of a deal to me. They do have good bitrates even on the lesser quality resolution ones.
- 131 models, nearly all have at least 2 scenes.
- Downloadable photos/screencaps.
- Good download speeds (80% of max) haven't ran into any download limits.
- Bring your imagination or some of these scenes might be disturbing.
Cons:
- Video quality is inconsistent but these are DVDs so they're drawing from the source material.
- I could see some people finding some of this to be offensive. Will explain below.
- One on one scenes not as good.
Bottom Line:
One of the most controversial niches in Japanese porn are the "inappropriate touching" scenes. I won't use the Japanese word. That's how a lot of these scenes start out. From a teacher being touched by a male student to a teacher being touched by one male student and multiple other male students getting involved. The categories list 20 of the scenes as group sex. Those are the ones that some people might be offended by. Of the categories, 28 more are listed as threesomes, those two can go into the inappropriate touching.
The fetishes that this site presents are business clothes, hose, stockings, heels, CFNM, clothed sex and better than most American sites there is a feeling of taboo here. I do believe that taboo has to do with Japanese men being typically smaller in stature and looking younger than they really are. The same with the female students looking very young.
This type of site plays to the positive side of the censoring mosaic. You'll get a lot of hands down pantyhose since the hose works as a mosaic. It gives the scenes more of an unwillingness feel to them. This quickly goes away when they start kissing and the woman, more times than not, is the more dominant (except in the group sex) cast member. This is one of my favorite parts of Japanese porn. I also have had a clothed sex fetish for many years and you get that here some with a teacher in a skirt riding on top of a male.
The quirkiness is here too. In some of the best possible ways. One scene has a female teacher standing in front of a podium. The classroom is all males. There's an older male hidden inside the podium and he has a pole with a finger on it rubbing it against the teacher's pantyhose crotch. She turns to write on the chalkboard and he's rubbing the pole/finger on her butthole. She gets so turned on she sits down in front of the podium and he's fingering her in front of the class.
Most of these scenes are not rough. Pantyhose tearing is common, the group sex ones do look rough like when 5 students are groping the teacher but these are mostly tame compared to the old Japanese touching videos from 10+ years ago.
I like them. The videos bitrate probably helps the lesser resolution scenes. Watching them in full screen on a 1080p monitor only brings in slight blurriness. The HD versions they do have are clear. Adding the screenshots adds a lot of value for me. These zips generally have around 150 screenshots in them.
I will say some of these scenes are quite old. One of the best ones I found was listed as November 2008 and if they're updating, I don't know where those updates are. The navigation is very good until you look for updates.
I think this is the best of the teacher sites. There are several scenes on here that I have seen before (tube sites) and wondered where they came from. I'll wrap up by saying both download speed and download limits are important on Japanese sites. Most have either poor download speeds and/or download limits. This site has neither with very good download speeds and I've downloaded nearly 200GB in one day without hitting a limit. Excellent value when using the TBP/PU discount. Recommended for those that are into any of the fetishes listed earlier or for anyone that wants to see some of the quirky world of Japanese porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Dark, artsy, hardcore, major close ups.
- Well-known performers seen in ways you're not used to.
- 160 scenes, each has a video and photos.
- Unlimited downloads on videos and photos.
- Easy to use navigation.
- Some of the most realistic and believable porn I've seen.
Cons:
- If you thought dark meant there's an edgy side to it, there is and there's a visibly dark (lighting) side to it too. At times is too dark visually.
- Seems like they could get more than 2 updates a month in this genre.
- Bonus scenes are stream-only and are mixed in with the regular scenes.
Bottom Line:
This site is receiving points just for being different. If you've ever been a member of I Feel Myself it's what this site reminds me of except it has male/female and lesbian scenes instead of solo.
The models, male and female, seem to have to be professionals as this isn't wildly filmed porn or anything too jerky. The camera often stays in the same area for minutes at a time, showing penetration, showing kissing, showing a woman going down on other woman. And they get close enough to see beads of sweat/fluids. The scenes feel slowed down, going for an erotic feel and they do a pretty good job of it.
I'm no fan of heartcore which is what this will remind some of but I don't see it as heartcore. I think this is serious hardcore, even the lesbian scenes. There's little to no story even though the scenes last around 30 minutes each and I think that goes with my thinking the action is slow, deliberate and erotic.
There are 160 scenes (including stream-only bonus scenes). The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes since November 2017 also have a 4K option.
The word that comes to my mind when watching these is artsy. The camera will pan away from the action to show the male or female's face as they are having an orgasm, then it will shift back to showing the orgasm happening. There's a lot of editing going on. That could be a con for some since the scenes have that television show feeling of a flashback, you saw their face and know they had an orgasm, the screen goes black for a second and shows the orgasm.
For me, it's worth a few points added since I haven't seen any studios shooting porn this way. This is a studio that produces DVD so the scenes are named and numbered to go with their associated DVD like Steamy Stories 1, Steamy Stories 2, Steamy Stories 3 and so on but there's not much story.
One thing the scenes aren't lacking, at least for me, is realness. For one, some of the oral, fingering, sex parts are so close-up it seems bigger than life-like. This could be a different form of POV even. This is like POV if you were the finger. I don't know if the site has much return value since they only update twice a month but if you've never been a member it's a good site to check out and download what they have.
There are plenty of stars here which kind of surprised me. Brandi Love is here, Blue Angel, and from the looks of it this site has been around awhile. The earliest scenes are from 2015. The scenes between 2015-2017 have 540p, 720p and 1080p. Even as a picture collector, this is one time that I don't think the pictures add anything. Between the lighting and the close-ups the pictures just don't help much.
Good for a one time join if you're looking for something a little different.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest online porn niche sites (first scene was 2003).
- Classic scenario (gloryhole) brought into the internet age except the taboo is white women with black men.
- 651 scenes up to 1080p download (details on resolution in Bottom Line).
- Photos/screencaps available for download.
- Simplistic navigation but requires a lot of clicking.
- Epoch is the biller.
- Still updating every two weeks.
Cons:
- The common con of heavy-niche content becoming repetitive applies here, though they and others have tried to add more to this niche.
- The dull scenes, this niche, maybe more than any in porn should bring out some kind of primal excitement from the female or fear but some of the models on here show no excitement or taboo stimulation.
- Not a con for me but if you want 4K you're going to have to pay $3.99 to $4.99 PER scene.
Bottom Line:
This site and Blacks and Blondes were two very important sites in my online porn interests. There was an old TGP site that had 5-10 second clips of porn scenes (early 2000s) and Blacks on Blondes and Gloryhole were two of the sites often featured. They would put 2-4 of these 5-10 second clips up for download and you would then have to merge them or load them in a playlist to watch them in correct order.
I was only early 20s though I had been exposed to porn (VHS/DVD/Magazines) for years. Gloryhole was probably the first I had seen that had a niche or story to it. At the time, I was also an undergraduate student and remember the university I was attending at the time actually having "real" gloryhole "problems" in some of the less used buildings. Those real ones were more for gay men like the married professor who would go to one of the gloryhole restrooms to get or give a blowjob to or from a college guy. Keeping in mind, "gay" was not as mainstream back then as was taboo for a heterosexual married male with children to risk getting caught in a restroom with another male.
I later heard of couples that wanted to experience something different using it as a way to experience swinger life without going full swinger.
The scenes here follow a fairly repetitive format. The big difference between scenes is the female model. Some are there to collect a check. Some will masturbate a little before starting the blowjob through the wall. Some do a good job of making you feel like they're genuinely excited, others don't. It is the upside and downside of Gloryhole porn. There's not a lot of middle ground. The scenes either seem to be near perfect or barely watchable.
Someone did come up with the idea of adding sex through the gloryhole. This is also hit or miss. If the cameraperson is unable to get a good angle, all you see is the side of the woman bouncing back and forth into a wall. Other times the cameraperson gets a closeup and steady view of the penetration.
Considering how long this site has been around their collection is not that large with only 651 scenes in 17 years. That's less than an average of one new scene per week since its start. On the other hand, this is not a common niche. I remember once searching gloryhole scenes on a DVD site and finding maybe 8.
They have tried multiple variations of the blowjob through the hole in the wall from sex through the hole in the wall to multiple guys.
The ones I seem to like the best are the ones where the woman is giving a blowjob through the gloryhole while fingering herself.
There's not much to complain about with the site and quality unless you want 4K. These are exact numbers, the most recent 190 scenes have up to 1080p and also have the purchasable 4K upgrade for each of those 190 scenes. The 220 scenes before those had up to 720p. The other roughly 50% scenes are 480p and below.
I do think they could have done something to fix the disparity in quality. A mass remastering of all those 480p and below scenes up to 720p (minimum) would make the content on this site very collectible being a rare niche usually filmed in poor to average quality.
As it is, it's an above average site with what is becoming a repetitive niche just because of the limitations the wall presents. That shouldn't take away from its importance in porn history as a site that was taking major chances nearly 20 years ago.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network dedicated to handjobs and making you sign-in a lot.
- Marked improvement since my last review in 2017, models are prettier, new themed sites, there's only so much you can do with a dick and a hand, but all kidding aside, there's nice improvements here.
- Good PU discount, their homepage doesn't show the discount and says it's $29.95 but once you click to join it gives you the $14.95 option.
- Easy to use navigation and while the network hub doesn't work the way you might like it to, I actually think it's better this way, will explain.
- 11 sites total, all except one are handjob/blowjob/tease related.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Downloadable videos (still can't believe that's a pro these days) and downloadable photo sets.
- I'm not for sure if it's the biggest handjob site/network but I'll get to the numbers in the bottom line. I think based on my memory it is the biggest handjob network.
- No ads beyond a page of ads when you first sign in.
Cons:
- The video download options and quality and filenames need some work. You have one full scene download option or you can download them in 4 parts. The full scene downloads vary from 480p, 720p or 1080p. You don't know what it will be until you've downloaded it and they're all named "high".
- This was a pro for me, it might be a con for you. The network hub shows all the sites available. When you click one, you have to login to it. That's frustrating for some but I will explain why I prefer it.
- Update schedule is kind of all over the place.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was after seeing a few of their scenes on tube sites. I think those scenes came from their site Club Tug which is the big site here. It was mostly older women, sometimes with a younger woman helping, in what was similar to CFNM with edging thrown in. They've since added multiple new sites. I think a common complaint for the older scenes was the models weren't always attractive. The newer scenes on their newer sites seem to be higher level models.
One con I didn't include is one I haven't ever figured out whose fault it is. Rocketgate is the biller. I have used them many times and I don't like that they store or remember your purchases and try to get you to sign up without putting your payment info in. One of the cards they have on file for me expired 2 years ago. Even worse, here on this site, it rechecks the pre-checked cross-sale, it also changed the price from $14.95 to $19.95. If the biller is doing this these sites need to let them know it's going to hurt their business.
The con about the hub requiring you to sign in on each site, which kind of makes it not really a hub. I like this better because you get a member's area that is exclusive to whatever site you sign into. So, when you click the model's list, say on their site Mylked, all the models are on Mylked. You don't get network-wide results. I prefer that. They do give you a randomly generated username and password so you have to keep on your notepad to remember it or copy/paste it in.
Club Tug is still the big site here. It has 436 scenes by my count, the hub says it has 500+, but just doing simple math of 12 scenes per page, 36 pages = 432 + 4 more on the 37th page. It's updating once a week. This site has a wide range of scenes from one woman giving the guy a handjob/blowjob while another woman watches and masturbates to grannies giving handjobs.
They have Tease POV which has 75 scenes and looks to be updating once per month. These are really good scenes that include more creativity than most handjob sites.
A newer site for them is Finish Him, it has 78 scenes and these are more like edging, some have two women, very good scenes. These newer sites they have really have added some life to the network. It updates once per month.
The newest site, Mylked, is the traditional milking table type scene where the woman lays under a table with the man laying on the table with his dick through a hole, kind of like horizontal gloryhole. There are 41 scenes on it and I would say they are some of the best on the site.
This is where it gets more complex. Cum Blast City looks like fake cum but after watching multiple scenes it looks real. This site would be very popular for those that like seeing a woman covered with cum. It has 320 scenes. The more I look at it, it looks like some of the scenes are fake dicks with fake cum, others are real dicks with real cum that must not have had sex in a decade.
Over 40 Handjobs has 240 scenes here and they're what they say, some are just an over 40 woman giving a younger guy a handjob, others are an over 40 with a younger woman giving a guy a handjob.
A fairly rare one with Ebony Tugs, there's 50 scenes of black girls over varying age, attractiveness and body type giving handjobs.
See Mom Suck is next with 112 scenes. This one isn't as good. Some of the mom's look like they just stepped out of the 1980s. Just being fair.
Mean Massage has 131 scenes, some of this is humiliation, but it's not that bad and some of it is quite good.
Teen Tugs has 211 scenes, these are very good and do good job of following the teen theme except for the few models that look like they probably have teenage daughters.
Last is Petite 18, it's out of place here, it has 71 scenes and they're all regular porn sexual intercourse scenes.
I did that so I could add the scenes up. That's 1,694 handjob-related scenes and I'm not counting the Petite 18 scenes in that number. I'm positive that makes it the biggest handjob site on the internet.
I spent more time on this than usual. It looks like the sites Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the newer Club Tug scenes are the ones with 720p or 1080p videos. The rest of the sites seems to 480p. I based that on downloading the 4 newest scenes from each site. I'm not going to take anything off for those but those 480p ones aren't helping the score either. I sit close enough to a 32" monitor that 480p isn't terrible. I'm more bothered by the filenames all being "high". I have a folder full of "high", "high (1)", "high (2)" and so on. I think with a little work there they could score even higher. I'm giving them a 13 point boost over my last score. They do seem to be working on improving the site and adding new scenes with better looking models, plus the higher video quality.
The different scenarios they use does make it a little more unique than other handjob sites, too. Recommended to tease, handjob/blowjob fans.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The flagship ATK site, it's as good of a photo site as there is.
- Updates are consistent but the types of updates change, could be 2 photo sets and a video one day, 3 photo sets and a video one day.
- You ready for the numbers? Over 13,000 videos and over 30,000 photo sets. This site has been around for 22 years.
- Amateurs, pros, there's a good mix of models and as is the case with other ATK sites, they do a good job of keeping the women in a down to earth look.
- CC Bill is the biller
- More than 10 years of HD videos.
Cons:
- The navigation leaves you wondering what you're doing wrong.
- The older content while expected is lesser quality.
Bottom Line:
The ATK Network, from the best I can tell, now includes ATK Girlfriends too and these individual ATK sites have long been a staple in any photo collectors porn hunting.
ATK Galleria is the most overwhelming of the ATK sites. Years ago, I used to join it 3-4 times a year. They're still running strong with the updates. There is a note on the sites that says they're not going to update on Sundays anymore but that's hardly a flaw. They release 2-3 photo sets and a video everyday Monday-Saturday.
The photos are downloadable in zips. The videos have been HD 720p or higher since 2008 and the majority of what you're going to see here is solo, not always masturbation as some of these models are amateurs just getting into the industry.
The navigation is really the only problem and it's a rather big problem. Clicking "photos" to see the newest photo sets brings up two rows, one says softcore gallery (number), the other row says hardcore gallery (number). No preview of who is in the set. The video tab is better in that it at least shows who is in the video but if you're looking to maximize the usage of ATK Galleria, you will use the model list and either know a lot of models you're looking for or be willing to sit and go through the full model list to find the ones you want to download.
I think it's a difficult spot for ATK. There's 22 years of models here. I believe Met-Art has the same problem. I don't think anything can be done to make searching through 22 years of models, easy.
This content is for collectors, in my opinion, those that have a list of 100+ models they collect and can just directly search those specific models. I don't think it's a good site for those new to porn. And I really think they should consider doing a year membership for the whole network. You could easily spend a year on these sites.
The feel of most of the photo sets is a professional cameraperson (they use many photographers) filming in a professional setting that keeps an amateur feel to most of the solo sets. I've never really cared for their hardcore sets but you might like them. I've never cared for hardcore photo sets from any site so it's not something against ATK's hardcore sets.
You see a lot of clothing fetishes here, lingerie, regular clothes, and though their solo videos go into full masturbation, I mostly prefer the pictures.
It's hard to score it much higher than I am knowing the navigation would be very difficult for a newer porn fan.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best, maybe the only amateur, Filipina site on the internet.
- Just under 500 models which to me is a huge amount considering the genre and mostly amateur. I say "mostly" just because a few of these models look familiar.
- Get on their email list and you'll receive many very good discount emails. I joined Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol for the same price one would have costed.
- Long videos, many are over 30 minutes. Excellent video quality, all videos have up to 1080p options on them.
- The videos are downloadable in 360, 480, 720 and 1080p.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max).
- Bills through Vendo, I've used them numerous times without any problems.
- Nice mix of Filipina "models", good age variation, some are more average looking, some are very pretty, all are horny.
Cons:
- Quite a few ads. My feelings rarely change on this con. They have one of the ones that annoys me more than the others, the moving one that is showing sex.
- There's no way to know when the updates are coming.
- Can't download pictures without an automatic download software that grabs all jpg and jpeg files, which in these days is not worth doing since it grabs the ads, the names of the scenes, the logo.
Bottom Line:
I was rough on this company's Asian Sex Diary site and am throwing this in until I can later re-review the new ASD, they made some excellent changes to ASD's navigation and layout.
Trike Patrol is kind of like ASD but I think it has a more playful, fun side to it. The guys (Is that you, Jimmy?) go around on a trike trying to pick up Filipino women to be in porn scenes.
The scenes play out with some conversation, some tease, then the sex. It has a quality I complimented ASD on, this isn't cookie cutter. Some of the models come off as shy, but as I have learned from Filipino women, that all goes out the window the minute their clothes comes off.
There are just under 500 models and 500 videos, each scene includes a video and you can view the pictures. The streaming player works well if you prefer streaming over downloading and the overall feeling is this is how amateur sex should look.
The videos and action in them have an authentic feel to them. While none of the guys are overly-hung, you can tell the Filipino women are not used to the size and you can see that little inner nympho in them coming out when their hand goes around the dick. I like the feeling that you get from some of the models looking like they have never really experienced anything like this and it excites them.
I've said it before and will say it when I get around to reviewing Tuk-Tuk patrol, their other site but in Thailand, one of the biggest complaints is there's not more content. That's one my most positive complaints I can give a site.
There's not a lot of extras but there doesn't need to be for me. The navigation is easy to use. You can line the scenes up and just go through them. You can use the model list or choose from categories/tags.
Whether this is taken as a compliment or not, I don't really know, but this site reminds me a lot of the old Pacino's Adventures where my our friend Pacino would cruise South America looking for amateur Latina models. Same concept here. This is not the same as say Bang Bus.
I enjoy the full videos especially when they take the women shopping for sexy clothes. It's an excellent site for those that like authentic, amateur content. Score would have been just a little higher if there were picture downloads.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Naughty America, one of the oldest porn networks, one of the most confusing and one of the better ones.
- 2,562 models, that's more models than some towns have people.
- They show 70 sites being unlocked but sites and themes and categories are being used as interchangeable.
- Good navigation if you know what you're looking for, see cons for any other situations.
- Download speeds could be better but they are 70-75% of my max. Most porn sites are 80% or higher.
- They have returned their archive to its full glory and are remastering some of the older scenes.
- VR and 4K content for those that like those. I have seen 4K options as far back as 2015.
- If you like something different in mainstream porn, their live scenes are the reason I joined this time. I have lost them twice in hard drive crashes.
Cons:
- The changes they have made have made the network harder to navigate, especially for new members.
- Falls into the "numbers trap", they have 20 sites that could be listed as 1, My Friend's Hot Mom, My Sister's Hot Friend, My Friend's Hot Friend, My Wife's Hot Friend. You get the idea.
- Lots of useless tabs in the navigation.
Bottom Line:
Naughty America review on Memorial Day. I have always liked Naughty America but a lot of that comes from specific models or specific sites inside their network. Some of my all-time favorite porn scenes are the Naughty America Live scenes. These are really nothing more than solo, themed scenes. But they make it look like the model is on a webcam with you. They have Live Naughty Student, Live Naughty Teacher, Live Naughty Nurse, Live Naughty Secretary just to name a few. They updated those sites for about a year then just stopped.
They thought the world needed another hardcore site with multi-dick penetration. They have some newer sites too. One is called Open Family. I thought it was the step-family porn but it is more like, "Daughter fucks her dad's co-worker" and "Sister fucks her sister's boyfriend". They have "Watch Your Wife" and it is themed as if the husband is recording his wife have sex with another man. They also have the step-family ones too. Sleazy Stepdad, Slut Stepsister and Slut Stepmom are three of the newer sites on the network. They are also looking to push boundaries with Watch Your Mom. This is older women having sex with their son's friend. It only has 3 scenes on it but they are at least trying some new themes.
It's worth mentioning they also have Tonight's Girlfriend Classic on here. Tonight's Girlfriend is a spinoff, standalone site for Naughty America. The ones you get here end in 2015. The site Tonight's Girlfriend is still active. If you've ever been curious about its content you can see the older scenes with a Naughty America subscription.
They excel in technical quality for a network. Their photo sets are screencaps of the videos but it is like they listened when people said sites should include 20 or so photos of the model, clothed and stripping before the scene starts. Their videos have 4K dating back to 2015, their VR scenes have all the options VR sites have and they include a 2D version for those of us preferring Fantasy Reality.
From what I remember they decided to let new members only have certain new scenes. That did not last long but their site still shows the setup.
The navigation shows a "membership" tab. If I click it, it shows 207 videos and the newest one is from October 2018. You have to go to the model list or movie channel in "channels" to find all the content. This works for me. My hard drive crashes zapped my collections of 6 models I used to collect on here and all of my live content. I knew what I was looking for. I then, out of curiosity, started browsing the site. There's no "new updates" option. There are 70 sites to go through. Some haven't updated in years.
If you want to see the newest updates you have to click on the "Naughty America" icon up in the left hand top corner. Why they don't put a tab for new updates doesn't make much sense.
The overall action is similar to what you will get on Brazzers, Reality Kings and Bang Bros. There's nothing wrong with it. It is straightforward, hardcore porn. They do try to follow a theme in most of their content but it is just in costume. You will get 3-5 minutes of themed content then it turns it into any other sex scene.
Their model list is a major pro to me. A few of my old favorites and number of scenes on here: Aaliyah Love with 23 scenes, Abella Danger with 24 scenes, Keisha Gray with 20 scenes, Lisa Ann has 53, those are just ones at a quick glance. They have a good mixture of body types and races.
I just don't know how a new member would feel about trying to find anything. If you didn't know the model's name or the site you would be in for clicking through 2,500+ models.
It's good to see them using Epoch as their biller. They do sign you up for a free chat account but it says you are not charged unless you interact with the chat models and agree to pay. There was one pre-checked cross-sale. Like a lot of sites these days when you sign in there a page full of ads. It doesn't count off since there are no ads once you click to enter Naughty America.
The network averages over 1 update(s) per day. Some days have 2. Everyday has at least 1. This might be the biggest selling point. If you like seeing "older" women (30-40 years old) with younger men they have a lot of that content especially in their newer content. Brandi Love is one of the most prolific models in that type of porn and she has 59 scenes on here.
Overall, I do think it fits right in with Reality Kings/Brazzers/Bang Bros and is a good value for what you get. If you look into the old Live content you will find a bonus you might have otherwise missed. Most of the point deductions came from the confusing navigation.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly teen sites.
- By my count there are 33 sites included.
- Pretty good update schedule, certainly could be better considering the number of sites. They average 3 updates per 4 days, across the network.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Nice, clean network hub which is something I think I took points off for in 2011.
- No cluttering ads, there are 3 at the bottom of the pages.
- Mostly really cute and pretty models but there's not a big variety from model to model.
- Excellent navigation and even says 24/7 support.
- Because of the nature of the content (teens, younger, slimmer) you won't see a lot of implants.
- Some of my favorite models on the network have double digit amounts of content.
- It does a good job of covering the majority of porn niches.
- Very good technical quality throughout from video quality to photo quality.
Cons:
- It's always a good thing when I have to nitpick cons. Several of their sites are very similar and could be merged like Nubile Girls HD and 18 First Sex and Beauty Angels and Teen Sex Mania and X-Angels. If they merged everything there would be 10-12 sites instead of 33.
- The "categories" don't always work. Which is why they should merge sites into one.
Bottom Line:
I once gave this site a lower than average score. I hadn't developed a taste for the humor of reading poor subtitles while watching porn. I remember the site being clunky back in 2011.
The good news is the corny subtitles are still there and now they're quite funny and they've turned the site into a streamlined, well-oiled machine, kind of.
You can tell most of the models (male and female) are not that experienced in porn. I watched a scene where the guy was so focused on the model's boobs he didn't notice her take her panties off and he reaches for them about 7 times before he realizes they are on the floor. It's like the first time I met a woman wearing a front snap bra!
I'm not as excited about the content. It's good and the models are very attractive if you like slim models. I do like what they've done with the site. It's like when I figured out what a front snap bra is!
There's a need for a little laugh at the dialogue from the subtitles. I just picked a random scene for this.
The female is a cute, probably 19 year old and she's sitting at a table in her house. She calls her I assume boyfriend. The dialogue is:
Her: Hello? It is me. Where are you? At work? I see. I'm waiting for you at home. I miss you. Ok. Please come faster. I'm waiting.
27 seconds pass and the guy walks in! Was he working on the front porch? Slide a "20 minutes later..." in there. He comes in and she tells him she will give him a massage. He lays face down, she straddles his butt and takes her shirt off!
Okay, okay, I'm giving them a hard time. Before she ever really massages him she's completely nude. Throw me a curveball ever once in awhile, have the guy say, "What the hell? I thought I was getting a massage? Why are you naked?"
I didn't list it in the cons but it is probably the most legitimate con of the site. If you don't like the corniness you might have a problem with the corniness.
Combining the sites that are similar wouldn't hurt but it wouldn't make a big positive either. The better navigation has fixed most of the old problems.
Their navigation is so good, I'm going to trust their numbers they list.
They have 1,383 models, 5,085 videos, almost 900,000 photos and they are all downloadable.
That's 9 of 33 sites still updating. The problem with this is the 9 that are updating also there's 4-5 others that fit into this group, could be used to put new updates in. First BGG and Tricky Masseur have a theme with them, the others are the same type of sites. Some of those listed as updating only have 2 updates in 2019 and this is the 4th month. Likewise, those 4-5 others might have a new update next month but haven't had one over the last month or two.
I wished the whole "network" gimmick would just go away. It's a website with about 20 niches/themes and each one is being called a different site(s).
Having said that, for barely legal looking teens they have you covered.
Let me throw this in, if you like 4K videos they have a lot here. Going back into 2016 even and they have VR scenes on the TMWVRnet site. I don't use either of those but they're there. The 1080p scenes are available from 2013 forward.
The photos they have are upwards of 3500 long end and for the ones into the VR and other video formats, they have some videos at 60 frames per second, Binaural sound, 3D and 180 degrees. If you're a VR person you will know more about those than I do.
I have to compare it on some level to a site like Nubiles Porn or even some of the 21 Sextury content and it compares well. If you're looking for something that is different and not too formulaic, this isn't going to be the best site for you.
It's one of those sites where you really can't find much wrong with it unless you don't like the content that well. I've obviously found some humor in the scenes and I do like the high technical quality but it's still lacking some personality and it still feels like the models are too similar. At least for my tastes.
I would even wonder how much of this content falls into the heartcore genre and that usually doesn't go over well with me.
I'm not going to punish the site for that. They've done everything they need to do with the quality, the pretty models, the multiple high quality video options and the much improved navigation and site design. This is a higher score than I gave it the two previous times. I believe I gave an 80 and then an 84, so an 88 is credit to their improvements. The content will be more up to your tastes. I could see it being polarizing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A nice change of pace site that also gave me access to Adult Time.
- I like alternative women, tattoos, and there is a lot of both on here. Would be a con for some.
- You also get a broader range of body types on this site, which is a major plus for me.
- Ran by Gamma, fairly easy sign-up and cancel but both could be easier, see cons.
- There's a good blend of content, you'll see threesomes, MMF, group lesbian and should say most everything is hardcore. There's not a lot of softer content but there's also not any too extreme hardcore either.
- Most of the models are very attractive.
- I would like to list navigation as a pro but the Adult Time hub takes the site over and you have to work with Adult Time's still clunky navigation. That to me is a Pro-Con.
Cons:
- One pre-checked cross-sale and after unchecking it and submitting payment, the same exact offer popped up on my screen. I consider this borderline unethical because the pop-up lands in the middle of your screen and looks very much like the "enter site" screens you see on some sites. Not a huge deal but why would someone join another site when they're given Adult Time?
- I won't say the action is 100% formulaic but most of the scenes do have a similar feel. You kind of get the feeling the "different" style of models is the unique part of this site. And that's okay but should be noted.
- Adult Time might have a negative to it that I just noticed and will go into in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member at Burning Angel several times over the last few years. Not surprising to those that know me, I originally joined it to get some exclusive scenes of one of my all-time favorite models, Regan Reese. There are several regular models on here that I do collect too, so a join each year or every 6 months is normal.
The con about Adult Time: I joined Burning Angel for $15, then I see that I have Adult Time which would keep some paying members for more than a month. The price after the promo month is $30 a month. I normally wouldn't notice that but I've been trying to figure out how these sites are just "giving" us access to Adult Time without an extra charge. I also wouldn't have thought about it if not for the pop up mentioned in the cons. As soon as you give me reason to question ethics, I start noticing other things I normally wouldn't have noticed.
I personally like Adult Time but it complicates sites that I collect from. And I have one yearly membership that gives me access to Adult Time, already. I would wonder if they've considered giving you the option to turn off Adult Time access? Especially for those of us that have more than one membership that gives access to it. I'm starting to think about potential problems that I and at least one other PU member had with Met-Art's Network consolidating your logins to their various sites (I lost access for 3 days). I stand by something I said way back in 2007 on a review, porn sites should use the KISS system of Keep It Simple, Stupid. No offense is meant, my dad used to say it to me about everything.
Burning Angel, years ago, was one of those sites that mostly flew under the radar due to the alternative/tattoos look of their models but now that tattoos are more common, you'll see a lot of mainstream porn stars on here too. I'll add a bit of humor, at least for me, I don't think I realized some of these models had tattoos! I have had a huge attraction to Regan Reese, who was one of the first mainstream, heavily-tattooed models, for over 10 years. I've explained that also as having met Regan and would say I consider her a friend now. She was nothing like I expected her to be and to whatever extent, I think that opened my mind more towards the heavily-tattooed models.
The site itself has most everything you could want. The newest videos have up to 4K option, there are multiple video resolutions available from tiny (360p) to 1080p on the majority of the scenes on the site. Joanna Angel is credited as the mind behind the site and she's one of the models I collect from this site. They also have screencap downloads. There are over 400 models, it does include males so probably 300-350 females. There are 937 videos as of today (1/22/2019), according to the site's main page but I'm a little disappointed over the Adult Time access or what I would call "takeover" of the site.
If you accidentally click "videos", you're going to be taken back to the Adult Time videos. If you search in Adult Time for "Burning Angel" it doesn't come up. It's also not listed in the 140 sites section. Luckily, one of the newest updates on Adult Time is a Burning Angel video. I clicked it and was able to click the "Burning Angel" tag on it and get back to just Burning Angel content.
That to me is a major problem. I don't care if it's in Beta. I joined Burning Angel not a Beta of Adult Time. I appreciate Adult Time for what it is, a clunky, massive catalog of porn. I appreciate Burning Angel for what it is, a niche site that almost zero of the other Adult Time sites are like. Not having it in the sites list or being able to even find it in a search within Adult Time is poor business. I've said it before, I'm not a computer programmer but I know it can't be that hard to get all the sites listed within the hub.
So, my feeling is Burning Angel, for those that like alternative/tattooed models, is close to a solid 90 by itself. With Adult Time making me jump through hoops to get back to the Burning Angel content, it's a low to mid-80s site. I'm sure they will get this all fixed eventually and I'll have a more positive view of Adult Time. As of right now, it's burdening sites like Burning Angel. What I mean by that is, I joined for the niche of Burning Angel's models. Not in the mood for regular, mainstream models.
This problem can be best shown by my above part where I clicked on "videos" on Burning Angel's page and it took me to Adult Time's videos. I was able to search within Burning Angel's models but I'm sure there's a model tab somewhere on there that will send me to Adult Time's models and not just the Burning Angel ones.
I would almost say it's the best of tattooed/alternative models but I really don't know of many of other sites that focus on this niche. It's recommended and hopefully they'll do something to improve the integration with Adult Time. It makes me wonder how many other sites Adult Time gives access to but aren't listed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively large site in the Fantasy Massage network. Focuses mostly on M/F but there are F/F and up to threesomes.
- Some well-known models and others that might be more mainstream than I realize but all are attractive.
- DL speeds are very good (80% of my max and above).
- Oldest content dates back to 2009 and the videos all have 1080p options, picture set with each scene and can be downloaded in zip files.
- I'm guessing it's one of the oldest massage sites. It updates weekly and has 529 scenes as of 11/13/2018.
- Very good mixture of models, it seems at one time they were going for Asian models but there are other races.
- Any site that's been around since say around 2010, has a high collector potential since a lot of these models have stopped modeling. They have one of my favorites in multiple scenes, the highly underrated Lana Violet.
Cons:
- It's mostly nitpicking, model list includes men and there's no way to filter the men out. Unless I missed it.
- Some scenes never really feel like a massage scene. That could be the use of known pornstars. No offense is meant to Asa Akira but as soon as I see her I think porn!
Bottom Line:
I have to admit something about my interest in this genre. Over the last few months, I started dating an Esthetician. It has opened my eyes to this profession, massages and waxes. I've also talked about how I sometimes delve into the dark world of fantasizing about the woman I'm with doing things with other men. Trust me, it's not that I like that side of me but it works.
Nuru Massage's older content especially goes into that part of massages. The newer content does to an extent but some of it really just feels like it could be a scene in a normal porn movie. The basis, again, especially in the older scenes, is a man (usually) goes to get a massage. The masseuse oils him up, giving him peeks up her skirt, at her cleavage and usually takes the porn turn when she notices the tent being pitched by the towel laying across his crotch. This works for me. Especially with the Asian models. Because the woman I've been dating is Filipino and the minute she thinks sex might happen she's ready. Doubt it if you must but there's at least one other member on here with a Filipino wife who would tell you the same thing. So, I really prefer the scenes with the Asian models.
I think these sites, any of them, these days are stuck with the models they have access to and more and more, whether on Bang Bros or Brazzers, there's a lack of interest/passion. Some of the newer scenes here at Nuru Massage also have that problem. The good part is, as far back as their content goes, you can get HD quality videos. It's kind of like you don't have to start at the newest content to find the best quality.
Any site that stays within their theme/niche has the potential to become repetitive but I will say they do a good job here of mixing things up. You get some F/F scenes, some with F/F/F, some M/F/F and the standard M/F which for me is the most believable. I think if I had the chance to produce a scene or two, I would look into working in more from less. Every scene doesn't have to progress to sex. Have it stop at a handjob or a blowjob. With the name "fantasy" in the network name, I would play more to that. Instead of following every other hardcore porn scene.
The models are very attractive. One of the ones I didn't know of that I really like is Rilynn Rae, other longtime favorites like Uma Jolie, even everybody's favorite MILF Brandi Love (she has a really good scene with Uma Jolie on All Girl Massage, in this network.) Keisha Grey is here with all her lovely curves. And as mentioned, Lana Violet who I originally knew of thanks to Twistys years ago. I find scenes of her about twice a year.
You also get the niche on top of niche with some scenes playing into the step-family niche. That is seen more on the All Girl Massage site with stepmoms and stepdaughters massaging each other. But there are some on Nuru as well. You know when Brandi Love shows up she's somebody's stepmother!
The navigation is very good across the network even. It's a Gamma network so if you've been a member of any of the Fame Digital networks, it works like those do. You have the different network sites on the left and can go to each seamlessly. At the top you have categories, which is more useful here than on a lot of sites because you can pick the actions you want to see and it lists them by the action. I'll point out here that I myself like the "Pussy rubbing cock" action and while it might be a little too broad in its results, it does pull out (not intended) the scenes with that great tease.
They have the model list with the problem mentioned in the cons but that's pretty common for networks to include the males in the list. I really believe the only problem that can be legitimately be complained about is it can become repetitive. My years of only joining solo sites tells that repetitive doesn't bother me as long as it's good repetitive. Most of this content is good. It adds almost a softer side to hardcore but doesn't fall into heartcore area.
The other complaint is my own. Just mix it up some, beyond F/F scenes and F/F/F scenes. Have the masseuse use a wand massager on the guy's back and thighs and then in-between her and him. It's minor stuff that I think would keep the content fresher. No complaints on the quality. I will say the picture sets are screenshots from the videos so it's not a 50-100 picture set of just the female. It's hard to complain about that these days since a lot of sites are going completely away from pictures. As that old saying goes something is better than nothing. I think this site would appeal to those who like hardcore, those who like a theme and those who know an Esthetician who likes to tell you about her experiences doing waxes (close enough to massages) and how the clients (both female and male) "respond". I haven't checked out all of the network yet but I will and maybe some of my own twisted fantasies are in here somewhere. As a network it's very good and recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm thinking it's the biggest porn site on the internet.
- It's a DVD site sort of and a separate studio that shoots their own content and that licenses some content that's only available on previously exclusive sites.
- The amount of classic content makes it worth joining. I'll go into that in BL.
- Navigation is pretty good considering how much content they have.
- Download speeds are very good, 80%+ of my max download speed.
- TBP/PU price makes it an even better deal
- Could be a treasure trove for collectors and likewise, could be a good place for newer porn users to start a collection.
- Numbers that are unbelievable in amount of content.
- The original content is on par with most of the big networks like DDF, Reality Kings, etc...
- Updates 4 full DVDs per day and 4-5 updates per week from their original content.
- Will leave you feeling like you got your money's worth.
- 16,500+ models
Cons:
- Well, it can be overwhelming. I think the numbers will show that better than I can say it.
- Here's a real con, the vast majority of the videos that aren't their original content come in all shapes and sizes of resolution. Including some as low as 480p.
- In some sort of strange way, I consider this a con, there's a lot of content on here that was exclusive to other sites for many years. Maybe it just feels like I've spent all those years collecting exclusive content now see a portion of it here in one place.
Bottom Line:
I usually start a review with a lead-in to the expected tone of my review but...
118,552 videos. Over 20,000 DVDs included in that number.
Others have mentioned the connection to Videosz and I can see that too. Some of the videos I've download still have the Videosz watermark on them. But there's also videos from once exclusive sites like DDF and 21 Sextury. Consider me shocked on those two. I thought maybe the DDF content would be a small sampling but it's over 700 videos from DDF.
The studios they have on here are common for DVD sites to have but not in this amount. They have 1,649 videos from Private. And 3,600+ from Eromaxx. Eromaxx is the studio behind Tainster. I do remember Videosz having some of Eromaxx's content for nearly 4,000 videos? More than anything, I'm showing why it's overwhelming even to an old porn digger like me. I have joined DDF, 21 Sextury, Eromaxx/Tainster and been overwhelmed by their sites. Here, they have these studios plus 8 pages of more studios. I would need a year subscription to this site to feel like I covered all of it.
Also of note: When you come to a DDF video on their site, under the video it states it's from DDF and that's on every video that's not exclusive to Bang. I think it's a nice touch because it shows they're not trying to fool anyone.
Their DVDs took up the first 3 weeks of my membership. April Flowers, one of my favorite models to collect, has more content on here than my entire 10 year collection of her has in it. She was a huge star in the late 90s, early 2000s. Charlie from Vivid? She's here. Just name a model, they're here. My all-time favorite model Eve Angel almost always did exclusive content only. She has 30 videos on here.
There is the one big con and that's the varying quality. I'm taking a guess that whoever licensed this content from exclusive sites did so for the original content not any remastered content. Same with DVDs, they are in the original resolution so you will see a lot of 640x480 (the old standard in DVDs) videos but where does the need for quality pass the need for quantity? A good example, the April Flowers scenes, because they are from around 2000, I've never seen them anywhere in any better than 480p quality. So, no loss there but there are DVDs here that I have seen at other DVD sites in better quality.
Over to their original content. They have it separated into sites like most networks do. You get these exclusive, original sites with amount of content out from each:
Bang! Real Teens - 107 scenes
Confessions - 53 scenes
Glamkore - 33 scenes
Bang! Japan - 353 scenes
Casting - 77 scenes
Real MILFs - 7 scenes
Gonzo - 56 scenes
This original content is very similar to what you'll find on the big networks. I will mention that the Japan content is uncensored and as the number of scenes shows it updates a lot.
So, if I were to try and explain what this site is it would go like this ... it's a newer network that has read and heard many complaints about not enough content so they went and added a top-tier DVD site and collection to their site so if you feel there's not enough original content, you can go back and find some DVDs you want or collect favorite models.
I can say with confidence that this hasn't ever been tried, at least not on the scale they are doing it. I do remember a few networks trying to add DVD content to their bonus sections but I would say Bang's non-exclusive content surpasses Videobox and Videosz. Which shows the value. With the TBP/PU price at $17.99, you're getting a DVD site as good as the best DVD sites and an exclusive network too. For some reason, I keep going back to the Japanese content. I have always been intrigued by Japanese models but most of the hardcore or even solo masturbation I've found is censored. Their Japanese content includes uncensored, situational masturbation, like sitting in what is supposed to be a public place with a skirt on. One camera shows the model's face while the other is in front of her skirt, under the table, showing her masturbating in "public". The other original sites they have are good but I have been burnt out on most of the straightforward network content.
My score might not look as impressive to some but I'm putting a personal twist on the score because I don't have the time to go through all this content. I also believe it goes into elevating quantity over quality which has also hurt the DVD sites in my recent reviews of those. If you have the time and patience to go through 122,000 videos and you like current networks like Reality Kings, add 10 points on my score. I did get all the April Flowers content and a couple of other old favorites. I also downloaded 75 of the Japan scenes too. Others will say my score isn't bad and it's not meant to be. This is a good site for anyone. Collectors like me will find content they haven't seen of their favorite models. Others will like the original content. It's deserving of the praise it's receiving.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Team Skeet network and more importantly, one of the last true amateur Latina sites.
- Still updates but it's sporadic, one a month, sometimes two.
- Pictures and video with every scene.
- 231 scenes as of 3/13/2018, 222 models, not all are amateurs but the vast majority are. You'll even find several pros on here but I'm not familiar with the newer models, most of the pros are in the old content.
- Decent variety in settings, a lot of the scenes start outdoors, in public.
- Site has been around since 2007, it was one of the original sites that predated Team Skeet the network. I remember joining it and Innocent High as a package several times pre-2010.
- Oldest scenes have an odd highest quality of 576p video, since early 2011, 720p and 1080p have been available.
- Download speeds are very good for me.
- The true amateur models. These are some of the best scenes on the internet.
Cons:
- Have to say it again, going to estimate that 15% of models are pros. The good to that is they're some of the best Latina pros like Rebecca Linares, Daisy Marie, Sativa Rose, Renae Cruz and those alone show they are older scenes since none of them have been active for years.
- Ads can be frustrating. I've clicked on an ad three times now but at least they don't charge you immediately.
Bottom Line:
Oye Loca was first introduced to me by Pacino of Pacino's Adventures. Think he said something like, "Fucking assholes" since they were cutting into his niche of amateur Latina models. I had no pity for him, more amateur Latina porn far surpasses pity for a man who wouldn't share his models. That whole paragraph is meant as complimentary to both Oye Loca and Pacino's Adventures.
I know the number doesn't look that impressive, only 231 scenes over 10+ years. On the other hand, it's impressive to see a very hard niche to shoot, continue to be updated for that long. Nearly all other amateur Latina sites are now gone. You'll see a lot of models on here who have no other content on Team Skeet. Which can be frustrating too but it at least shows that a lot of these models were one and done.
The story or depth of the scenes is fairly limited since very few of the models speak English. But amateur Latina models rarely need to talk to give a good scene. Have heard others who shoot Latina porn say "they believe in earning their pay".
In comparing the content to Pacino's Adventures, you did get the feeling that Pacino had closer relationships with his models. I think he tried to marry 3-4 of them. And might have. The authenticity comes through more with Oye Loca since they aren't just putting their pretty Latina friends in dozens of scenes. It's why I once said Oye Loca is one of the most impressive sites on the internet. I'm not for sure where all they shoot but I'm going to guess Colombia, Peru (maybe) and most likely Brazil. Those aren't the safest countries to go running around trying to secure sex from young, pretty, women. A lot of the scenes feature male talent who are Latino. So, there could be some kind of partnership coming into play there.
The odd 576p videos look pretty good. The 720p and 1080p look very good. And even though all Team Skeet sites seem to want you to miss the picture sets and screencaps by naming their scenes as "movies", there are zipped picture sets and zipped screencaps. The picture sets almost always start fully clothed so you get the tease and strip from those.
I know there's been a lot of comments about the poor download speeds but I haven't experienced them. My download speed is around 80% my max. I'm not for sure where they're located but I don't think I'm that close to their server.
The scenes are straightforward. Almost all scenes are between males and a female, either 1 or 2 guys and the female. There are some group with more than one female and a couple girl/girl but the Team Skeet guys are getting their money's worth! I can hear it now, "I had to run from 6 chickens, 2 goats, jump two fences, dodge a street gang, just to get to her front door. Don't tell me she doesn't shoot porn with men."
What you're really going to see are amateur models who love sex. You won't see much shyness or innocence. I think that can be a problem for some. We're very used to seeing young models who are timid or camera-shy.
To me, this site alone has kept me coming back to Team Skeet at least once a year. And for the third time in my 11 years of reviewing porn, I've scored a single site higher than the network it's a part of. Once onto the Oye Loca site you get a search engine that only searches Oye Loca scenes, there are still ads but not near as bad as on the Team Skeet network hub. You even get a model list of all the models who have content on Oye Loca and those results also show how many scenes the model has across the network too.
The only other site that is still around that I would compare to it is Latina Rampage on the Bang Bros Network. Pacino's has been down for a few years. And Latina Rampage updated for about a year before becoming an archive site. So, Oye Loca, to my knowledge is the only Latina amateur site that is specifically focused on Latinas that is still updating. Worth a join for anyone who likes Latinas, for those who want a little more oomph in their scenes and for those who are looking for bouncy, perky teens who perform like they won't ever be able to have sex again.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Quite possibly the longest-running solo model site on the internet. Earliest content is January 2003.
- Offers genre diversity that's usually not seen in a solo model site.
- Still updating but the updates are only 2-3 times a month.
- Navigation is okay as this is a large site but it could use some cleaning up.
- If you like big-boobed blondes you'll like Wifey.
- Download speeds are very good, right at 70-80% of my max speed.
- I would go as far as calling the content some of the most authentic I've seen.
Cons:
- I think this goes above the other cons. Everything could use an updating. The site, the navigation, the tabs and it could be made more efficient.
- The majority of scenes are of either Wifey and her husband or her husband and another woman. I think is probably hit or miss since if you really like Wifey it's a good thing. I do like her but only one solo model hasn't ever been able to get my full attention so the content does become repetitive.
Bottom Line:
It's hard to say too much negative about a model who has been in porn as long as Wifey has and it's probably risky to talk too much about how long that's been too! I'll start this review by saying I mean everything positive. There are no jabs at age.
I'm taking a slightly different route than usual because I think the negatives with this site kind of take away from the site. Starting with the wonky navigation and programming. On the main screen there are 5 tabs across the middle-top. Those are "Store", "Contact", "Friends", "Classics" and "Miscellaneous". I normally wouldn't even visit the store but for the review it shows scenes that can be bought for $19.95 each. No clue what the purpose is. The contact tab is emails to contact them at. Friends, to me, should be eliminated. I clicked on 6 different ones and instead of it being content to view, it takes me to the friends solo site. Classics has one scene in it. Miscellaneous has about 20-30 cartoon drawings and another tab for "sounds". Clicking sounds open a new page but it redirects back to the home page. That's 5 useless tabs to me. Up in the upper right hand side of the screen is Wifey's Blog which she still does update. Beside of it in the far-right margin is Wifey's Galleries. How can a site take up 75% of their space with tabs and content that most Wifey fans won't even look at? Of note, there are "video" and "photos" tabs under those useless 5 tabs but I didn't even notice them until 3 weeks into the membership. It seems that would only take basic changes to fix all that. Put Wifey's content right there in the middle.
Now that my OCDC is finished complaining there's the good parts. What you have with this site is what feels like something that started out innocent enough. The oldest content dates back to January 2003. I don't know which one came up with the idea of making a site as Wifey seems to love all aspects of it and her husband is benefiting like Ryan Madison (Kelly Madison's husband). I would compare the content to Kelly's sites.
I haven't watched every scene but every scene I have watched has both Wifey and her husband in it in some way. There are scenes that her husband has sex with other women. Scenes where she has sex with other men. But a large portion is her and her husband together. This leads to that second con. Eve Angel kept my attention for several years as a solo model but even Eve started to fade. To think Wifey has been doing this for 15 years is worth 5-10 bonus points. Not just because of the years but because she is still very attractive. She still has the same excited personality for sex. She's playful, even silly and that is why the bonus points are there. She comes across as very genuine.
Here's what she excels at: Dressing sexy, this is a lost art. I would even say dressing slutty. You can tell by her content and how she releases it that she really enjoys being pretty but not in an arrogant way. Exhibitionism, way back in her earliest content she's outside, out in public, flashing her huge boobs and showing excitement and arousal from it. She still does in her newest exhibitionist content. Handjobs/blowjobs, I'm combining those because she does. What seems to start as a handjob turns into a blowjob because of her excitement. Sex, I would compare her closely to Eva Angelina. Its not her best "skill" (that didn't feel right). But she gives a lot of effort and is down here just because the other skills are very good.
Amount of content as of 1/30/2018 is 590 videos and 602 photo sets. That's a lot of content for a solo model. The photo sets are available in downloadable zips. You also get most of the videos in 720p but there are no 1080p options on those and the oldest videos are 320p. I'm not taking much off for those since they are over 10 years old but did want to mention it.
This is where the review becomes more difficult. Is it worth a join? For me it is. I still have trouble finding newer porn that I really like and the first sites I joined 15 years ago were solo model sites. In most cases Wifey wouldn't be the type of model I'm into it. Her boobs are something like 38DD and I'm usually indifferent to boobs. She's slender which usually doesn't attract me either. She's blonde, that's not going to hurt much since I do prefer brunettes but her hair is pretty. She has a very 90s California look to her. I think she's from Oregon which is close enough. Convincing me she's genuine fixes everything. Her most genuine is when she's doing exhibitionism.
I would recommend it to those who are into exhibitionism. Those who are into solo models and don't need a lot of variety of models. I'll even say those who like handjobs. She's one of those models who you can tell really enjoys giving them. These are all pluses for me and makes this one of my favorite solo sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- More of a softcore site, but not as soft as it used to be and has some of the prettiest models in the world on it.
- Good handling of signing up, cancelling, as it's part of Met-Art's network and uses the same cancelling method as Met-Art.
- 2-3 updates per week depending on the week, this nearly landed in cons, but will explain in BL.
- Excellent navigation, uses the same or similar site format and style as the other Met-Art sites.
- Very good download speeds, right around 80% of my max which is what I get consistently on Met-Art sites.
- Good for photo collectors! That almost gets two pros just because it's so rare to see these days. I'll further this in BL too.
- Some rare slightly harder than softcore sets of models who are more known for just softcore.
- I think this applies across the Met-Art network sites, everything is high-quality.
Cons:
- So, you like amateur models who aren't glam? This probably isn't the site for you.
- Picture sets can be on the small side, not resolution, but amount of photos in each. And the membership I signed up for is only offering 720p on the videos. Not for sure if there's another level that has higher. If there is, I haven't seen it.
- You might run into a feeling of "seen that, saw that" as you go from scene to scene.
- Could be clearer about the biller. I had a charge on my bank card from this site, but hadn't heard of the biller and thought it was fraudulent.
Bottom Line:
A confession: I have had the biggest crush on Lana Lopez for nearly a decade, also known as, Next Door Lana. I was looking through my old content of her and found a video from her own site that's no longer around. It was branded Holly Randall, so I joined for that very reason. A search on their site said they had more content of her and it's the closest I've seen Lana do to even masturbation (not counting those newer scenes or In The Crack).
Getting that content, including the photo sets too, would have been enough to make me a happy customer. As I looked at Lana's pictures, I decided to go look at some of the other models. Much like the top photo sites, this site has very clear, high-resolution photos that are shot in beautiful locations and settings. They also have quite a few of their models starting out in regular clothes or a bikini. It's becoming a lost art so they get a bonus 5 points for that.
The update schedule threw me off. And I'm still going to say it's a little inconsistent. It doesn't help that I'm a dyslexic American and they use the UK way of listing dates with the day first instead of the month. But there is inconsistency in the updates. The month of October had 10 updates, but there was a no-update period of 5 days in the middle of the month.
Then they released a Halloween set of one of my all-time favorite models Veronica Rodriguez and all was forgiven! Didn't even realize she's still active.
My recommendation of this site would depend on several things. Photos are a big enough part of this site that some updates are just photos. There's some b/g content, but it's not that common. I would estimate 20-25% at most. The majority of the content is solo pretty women masturbating. With a catch, this is common across all sites that have solo masturbation, a lot of it is very mechanical feeling.
Then I stumbled on a set with Gina Valentina in it and all was forgiven! Dear lord, where did they find her? Can I move there? I seriously found a new model to collect. Not for sure how "new" she is, but I hadn't ever seen her and she's the first one I've added to my collecting folder in 2 years. They do something else here that I usually only say about In the Crack, the women here look better here than on other sites. An example is Uma Jolie, who I've considered collecting, but changed my mind, the content here makes her stunning.
That's a big plus here. Even if you prefer amateur models and I'm probably 50/50 now myself, there are some really pretty women on here.
My biggest complaint which was only mentioned a little in the cons is the size of photo sets, same with the videos, they're fairly short. That's one of those "it's not really a con since I'm just wanting more of what I see" but since we don't have on-demand porn subscriptions to request to see more of a set, that's a slight con eventually.
Then I saw Karlee Gray, Aubrey Sinclair and Val Dodds. I'm not going to say it again, but I forgot the cons.
It could be that I'm not joining as many sites these days or it could be that I join sites that don't have these newer models on them, but I found multiple models that I started "collecting" folders for.
Technical quality is very high on photos, not as good on videos.
Pictures are downloadable and newer ones are in the 6000 long end range.
Videos for me have 720p option, 360p option and a mobile option. I joined with a normal membership and don't remember there being an option to join a 1080p version, not that I would have since I prefer 720p, but it's worth mentioning since some of the updates being photo sets will already irritate those who like videos only.
Over 300 models, which I think is a little low and might show that they're selective. Most of the models I've like have multiple photo sets and videos.
Roughly 700 videos and 600 photo sets. I should mention here that Holly Randall is the daughter of Suze Randall, a legendary name in porn. Holly, herself, has sets on here as well. Kind of adds a different feel to it since she also is a photographer on the site.
Which I think leads to how I feel about the site. I think with Holly's direction these models, the photo sets, the videos, have very high tease and "slip" photos like Amia Miley, who I thought was long gone from porn, in a bikini and in one photo the bikini has slid over. There's a lot of that here and it's good for me. They even have a tag for "striptease". Sometimes, doing less is more.
Great site overall, but certainly not for everyone. If you're a video lover, you might still like this site, but the best content, on this site, to me are the pictures. I honestly liked it better than I thought I would since my original reason to join was to just grab the Lana Lopez content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An interesting, hardcore site that features models I've never seen and some older Euro models who I thought were retired.
- Updates weekly. A mention here on navigation since they have separate categories and it can make updates a little confusion. There are new "videos" added weekly though.
- By my count, there's 212 videos as of 10/26/2017.
- Download speeds are very good which was an initial concern, but I am downloading at 80% of max speed.
- And since it has come up before, the videos are downloadable and have options from 144p to 1080p.
- The content is quite unique and might be the biggest pro/selling point, will further this quite a bit in the bottom line.
- Subtitles on the scenes I've watched. There's also the setting to make the site's text in English.
- There's pictures and stills that are downloadable, but this will be in the cons too.
Cons:
- I hate to make this con since I can see they are trying to make things more interesting, but the different channels are confusing. Most sites that have "channels" have different content on them than what's on the main site. Channels here are, "Sex", "Casting", "Hints and Tips", "Documentaries", huh? Those are all porn scenes. A+ for effort, it's unique, but that's going to confuse a lot of people. Seems like Sex Art did something similar.
- The photos and stills, I think pictures would be a major plus on a site like this and they have picture sets with each video, but some have 4 photos in them. Some have 20. Some have 30. The stills are what the word says, screen captures from the videos.
- Last and this is a personal preference one, the women are Italian, European and they, in general, fit in that category of "hard" looking. The best example I've ever known of this look is Mya Diamond. I personally like it. But some won't.
Bottom Line:
I want to start by saying I've seen La Sublime XXX's webmaster asking about new reviews and want to say, I paid for my membership. I won't, however, let that alter my score as I'm going to be as fair as possible since they do seem to be genuine about trying to make a great site.
That's the thing, it's a great site. But there's several "buts". I find the models to be very attractive, but I tend to like models who don't look like they just stepped out of their 18th birthday party. Even the younger models on this site look more like women than say teens. Think Eve Angel when she was 18-19, she was a woman not a teen, at least not by porn standards.
The navigation and how to move about the content is easy to use, very clean, simplistic design, but if you go into "channels", you're going to wonder what in the heck is going on. I could be wrong, but based on looking at each "channel" it looks like they've stopped some of them which is a good idea. One is Backstage, one is Interviews, maybe the funniest is "Hints and Tips". Those are not bad at all. They have one of a woman showing how to squirt. They have one of a woman showing how to give a handjob. That's interesting and unique too. I think maybe Vivid used to do those, but haven't seen anyone doing that in awhile. I would keep those updating. I'm interested to see how many things there actually are! Then they have "Reviews" which is models testing and reviewing sex toys. That's interesting too. They have what looks like a one-shot 7 episode documentary with Priscilla Salerno, who I think is a very attractive model.
Where I think those become confusing is they are included in the regular updates/videos. They also have a "Best of" channel that updates in the regular updates/videos. For me, a one month member, I don't know if those are scenes that were once released just as a regular "video" then re-released as a "best of" and counted as an update? That's why I think the channel part is confusing overall. I counted the scenes the way I would on any site, multiplying the number of columns of updates by how many scenes are in a row. And do know that Interviews, Backstage, are included in those updates. Really, just typing that out made my head hurt.
I don't think they should stop the How To, Best of, but I do think they should stop tagging them as different from Sex Scenes.
The reason I went through all of that is by my count, there's just a little over 200 scenes on the whole site. If they disagree and have a different number, then my number is off because of the multiple unneeded tags/channels.
Moving on to the content: There's content here that I think members would if nothing else, find interesting. By interesting, it could mean sexy, it could mean sensual, it could mean humorous and so on. I'll give an example of a scene I watched earlier. The female model seems completely unimpressed by the male model and you have to know this happens in all porn, but they capture it and have her talking about it. It's bad enough that she's telling the guy to finger her because she's not even wet. By the end of the scene, she's talking about how he was much better than she expected and was making jokes about taking him home with her. There's a realness there. I have family that speak Italian, so I can understand most of it and there's English subtitles. Which is the really strong point to this site. For one of the first times ever, we have non-English speaking porn that has very clear English subtitles. It adds personality to the "foreign" women that we don't usually get to see or should say hear. And don't overlook those "how to" videos, the woman talking and explaining the steps, actually adds an excellent tease/erotic value to those scenes.
A few overall complaints before the technical parts:
The photo sets have to be bigger. Photo collectors are going to be very disappointed when there's 4 pictures from one scene.
Considering there's only one update per week, don't bring those interviews/backstage back, not if they're going to count as an update.
Outside of those, it's a great site. There's around 212 videos. Again, if the number is off, I'm just going from the videos link to count them. There's not a lot of backstage/interviews, maybe 15-20 combined. And while there's women here who I do know, like Simony Diamond, the vast majority are women I've never heard of. That's a big draw for me.
There is a "categories" section, so since I know we have anal lovers, there's around 60 scenes with anal.
The videos are downloadable up to 1080p, I download the 720p and they are very clear, I would go as far as saying excellent clarity. The files are not small. The 720p are right at 5000 bitrate. The 1080p are at 8000 bitrate.
I would recommend it to those who like Italian women especially and for those who like hardcore, but would like to see a little creativity thrown in too. I'll be back in about 6 months. Add more pictures and I'd bump it up to 90.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site dedicated to "exotic" women, a classification that is mostly based on ethnicity.
- These are typically my favorite models, if my screenname didn't give that way.
- The site updates a lot, but there's no way to put a specific number on them, it is daily and it's multiple updates per day. Will further this in BL.
- I think this is a pro for me, a lot of these models are very much amateurs and the ones who went on to be big name pornstars, have some of their earliest sets here.
- The models aren't overly made-up, it's not really a glam site at all and most are in very normal everyday clothing.
- Technical quality on newer sets is good, but there is a dropoff as you go further back into the catalog.
- Navigation is very good, these ATK sites have streamlined and cleaned things up, one of the easier sites to navigate.
- CCBill as biller
- I would say this is one of the last sites that focuses both on photos and videos.
Cons:
- As good as the navigation is, things can be a bit wonky. Never knew wonky was a word until the last year of reviewing. What I mean by wonky is gallery thumbnails don't always line up, kind of reminds me of when websites were loaded in frames. It's nothing major, just something I notice.
- It's a similar story to most older sites that are still around, the older content interests me more than the newer. That's a subjective one.
- Not enough video options, newer videos have the 1080p option then the next step down is 480p.
Bottom Line:
ATK Exotics has been a favorite of mine for a very long time, but things feel a bit stale in 2017. I should note that I also said the same thing about Nubiles, which is also a great site just like the ATK sites are. So, that stale feeling might very well just be me.
There's only one real premise here. Mostly young, somewhat innocent, any race that's not white, though there are white models on the site. You'll be hard-pressed to find a site with this many mostly amateur black models. There's also plenty of Asian and Hispanic models too. There's a smaller amount of Middle Eastern and Filipino, I'm only separating Filipino from Asian because a Filipino friend tells me she's not Asian, but instead, Pacific Islander.
The photo sets are a big draw here. They are downloadable in 3 sizes, with the biggest size topping out at 3000 long end. You're going to get more photo sets than videos too. To kind of give you an idea of how much they're updating:
Today is 8/6/2017, today's updates have been posted and so far in August they have added 20 photo sets and 6 videos. So they are averaging a video and roughly 3 photo sets per day, which is very impressive.
The videos are good, but you shouldn't expect pro-level performances. It's very clear that some of the models are shy. The HD videos are 1080p at 6000 bitrate. They look nice enough, but there's no 720p option so you either download the 1080p version or drop all the way to 480p.
I think this site excels in bringing early content of eventual stars. Probably the best example of this is Jynx Maze. She has 20 photo sets here, all 20 sets are from 2010, just before Jynx became one of the most popular and prolific models of the 2011-current era. She's in light makeup, wearing normal clothes and even shows an innocence that you'll rarely see in her later hardcore work. But she's far from the only one, there's dozens of eventual stars who have early photo sets here.
I'm not for sure how much this will be taken as a compliment, but with the surge of casting couch sites, that's kind of what ATK Exotics reminds me of. Which makes for a unique experience since you've probably seen the more known models in much more hardcore content than you'll see here. Making it good for collectors of specific models.
The somewhat silly and politically incorrect tags can still be found when you go to the photos section. Like "ghetto" which is almost all black girls who aren't exactly prototypical "pretty". Then one we've joked about before "dime pieces". I've got two younger nephews who say no one uses that slang anymore. There are side pieces and main pieces now. So, I'm guessing they could change "ghetto" to side pieces and "dime pieces" to main pieces. Just having a little fun there.
I should add that it's not all just solo. There's some girl/girl content and boy/girl too, both in videos and photos. One of my favorites on here is Aliana Love, she has some pretty good hardcore sets on here.
As good as the navigation is, you'll be doing a lot of clicking. Go to model list, click the first letter of the model's name, opens up a page of 10-12 models, click again to see the next 12, click again to see the next 12. I'm starting to think sites shouldn't be punished for this since it shows how much quantity they have, but it can get tiresome.
Maybe my current favorite part are the Pacific Islander models, a little bit of an Asian look, but usually with a fuller build than Asian models have. Also, will mention, there are models of nearly all sizes here. Not for sure any would fall under BBW, but there's quite a few "thick" models.
Overall though, the site is very good at what it does and it updates a lot, relative to other sites in 2017. It's recommended for collectors and/or anyone who likes seeing models of different races.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site/network of "amateur" content.
- Navigation is surprisingly good, there's a lot of content, but all can be accessed from the toolbar at the top of the Net Video Girls site.
- There's multiple "sites" included: Net Video Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls, Black Ambush, Casting Couch HD and Broke Model.
- Some of the sites include picture sets that are downloadable as zips ... but there's a con involved here.
- Download speeds are extremely fast for me, hitting right at 90% of my max download speed consistently, the average porn site downloads at 50% of my max speed.
- Nice diversity in models, both in body type and race.
- Have liked it enough to let it recur for a second month.
- There are weekly updates. Though, these vary by site. But overall there are new scenes across the network.
- Another that will border on pro/con depending on the user, some of the videos are very long. I've seen as long as 93 minutes.
Cons:
- The biggest con is the inconsistencies. Some of the sites have filenames that name the model, other ones have the name of the site and nothing else. Some of the sites have picture sets that you can download in zips. Other ones don't even have pictures you can view. Some of the sites have dates on the content. Other ones don't. These are minor and common annoyances, but annoyances nonetheless.
- I'm having video resolution inconsistencies, but maybe it's because I'm downloading some of the older videos and they just have them listed as "HD"? One of the ones I downloaded as HD was 768x432 resolution.
- No pictures on the Net Video Girls site.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying I really like this site or network of sites however you see that. The majority of these models look like real amateurs, some chubby, some slim, some in-between, and there's a good variety of races as well.
I really don't like that Net Video Girls doesn't have pictures. Several of the other sites do have downloadable picture sets. Then there's the inconsistencies, I don't have enough knowledge of computer programming to know why a non-HD video would be listed under HD, but it's not that big of a deal. I consider as low as 720p to be HD. Their newer videos also have 4k option, so they're putting out high technical quality content overall. It's just their older content is worth looking into too and that seems to be where the inconsistencies show up.
The length of the videos and size of videos also varies greatly. I've dowloaded scenes as large as 2.5GB and as mentioned above, as long as 93 minutes. I'm not complaining about that. It just should be known that the videos can be very long considering it's one scene.
There is a more natural feel to this site than most amateur sites, like the really long scenes, compared to some that are only 20-30 minutes. That makes the scenes more believable to me. Some of the models seem to really enjoy teasing as well, which is why I don't understand the absence of pictures on Net Video Girls.
The amount of content you receive with the site and the network is impressive. I would say it's the largest amateur site I've been on. They're not doing any favors though on content count or exact numbers. Each year (dating back to 2000-01) has a list of calendar girls, most of the earlier years it was 12 per year, but over the last few years there's been more than 16 per year. That's just on Net Video Girls. Then Casting Couch HD has a similar setup back to 2013 and no set number per year, but there's more than 12. A little cleaning up would help these sites.
But the overall picture here is there's a lot of content between the seven sites they list in their network.
Luckily, the navigation lets you move from one site to the next and a model list and there's those fast download speeds to mention. I've seen a few known porn stars, but most of these models are genuine amateurs. You also find something fairly rare here and that's two amateur models in a scene together (girl/girl).
The filename problems seem to just be on Net Video Girls, where all the scenes I've downloaded are named netvideogirls(dot)hd(dot)mp4. So, you'll need to either manually rename them to the model's name or let your computer rename them to netvideosgirls(2) and so on. I've just renamed them to the model's name since one amateur site I was on recently didn't even give you a model name. This one at least does that.
I would recommend it to anyone who likes the casting, amateur-type site, it has a lot of content, good technical quality and the good blend of model types. And if it shows my own enjoyment of it, I let it recur and have been a member for nearly two months now. Just be warned of the inconsistencies listed above.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site that at least tries to add taboo.
- Easy to navigate as long as you don't mind scrolling.
- 113 scenes as of 7/4/2017
- Each scene has a video and picture set with it.
- Billing through Epoch
- As unbelievably believable as this niche gets, which means not very, but they do a good enough job at it.
- Good price through TBP/PU even if it's a small site. (Edit: Must have been some kind of promo through PU, was under $10 when I joined, now is showing $17, still worth a month join)
- Production values are high here and there's a story with every scene.
Cons:
- There's a reason few porn stars become mainstream actresses.
- Could have more video size options, will further in BL.
- It's not a very big site and it's only updating once a week.
Bottom Line:
The step-brother/sister/mom/dad niche is what you're going to get here. I'll admit, there's just enough taboo here to give the scenes at least a feeling of "it could be real".
As strange as this will sound, I have tried watching scenes in the niche with the sound off. It lets me focus on the actions/expressions and that, often more than the words, shows how believable these types of scenes are. Cliched hair-twirling by the younger female models, outfits that look like they were made for much younger models, etc...
Still, I have trouble believing anyone who joins this site is doing so with the belief that these are relatives, even if just by marriage.
Having said that, Family Strokes at least does a good job of setting the story up, giving it a different scenario, setting and if you tap into your imagination enough it at least is believable enough. Beyond that, you have porn that reminds me a lot of the porn from the mid 90s to early 2000s. Back when porn was as cliche as possible, but was at least entertaining (not including sex).
They offer three video sizes, 1080p, 540p and 360p. As others have mentioned, it would be nice if they added a 720p option.
They also offer picture sets with each scene that are dowloadable, maxing out at 1600 long end, these photos are pretty good. Plenty of teasing in them.
The downsides aren't that bad. The size of the site and update schedule will most likely mean you'll only to join once a year and download whatever new content you want. There's just over 100 scenes right now, it would be a good site for them to repackage into some kind of network, but at under $20, I do think it's at least worth that as a one month join.
Would like to see them have more of the threesome type scenes where one member watches, as those are the best, at least for me. I really like the site's potential and production values, there's at least a story to follow. I like it well enough to rate it an 88, mainly because I intend to download and keep all the scenes from it.
Beyond those who are into the step-family member niche, I think those into voyeurism also would like some of these scenes and those into porn with any kind of plot at all, would as well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A high-production values site that specializes in anal.
- If you're looking for high-quality, this is the site for you. Of the 140 scenes available, around 60 are available in 4k, they also offer 1080p on all scenes and have smaller resolutions as well.
- Every scene has a downloadable photo set, pictures are 3000 long end.
- Updates every 5-6 days.
- Top-tier models, almost look like women who shouldn't be in porn.
- Above-average download speeds and no limits that I know of.
Cons:
- This one is the really only true con, but I'll split it. First, the content is repetitive.
- The scenery, setting rarely changes.
- If you watch a few scenes in a row, you're going to realize you're watching a staged porn scene.
Bottom Line:
I had heard a lot about Tushy/Blacked/Vixen, but hadn't been a member of any of them. It's obvious this isn't a site or studio that's trying to churn out quantity over quality. The scenes on here are fairly straightforward. There's a little talking, usually from the female model, leading into the scene, but it almost always revolves around sex or fantasies.
You can't complain about the technical quality or even the sex. The sex is believable, all involved seem to enjoy themselves. The scenes are typically longer than many sites, most I've watched are over 40 minutes.
I now have a 4k television/monitor (got it more for PS4 Pro). The 4k scenes are crystal clear, but I still just download the 720p ones to keep. Which is a strength at Tushy, I'll download and keep all of these scenes. Production values have always played a part in my interest in porn and they do those well.
Which is also a bit of a negative, but not worth a con, there's not a lot of content here. What it's going to amount to is if 140 scenes is more than you would usually download and keep from a site with 10,000 scenes. If so, this site is a very good deal.
I would like to see more variety in the location(s). I've had this problem before with sites like FuckedHard18 and X-Art. The site itself kind of reminds me of X-Art.
Navigation is clear and easy. The numbers as of 5/29/2017:
106 models
139 scenes (videos and pictures)
And all scenes include anal. I'm back and forth on anal, but most of these models look like they enjoy it and nothing comes across as forced. Which might be the biggest selling point here. These models look like models, seeing them do anal and enjoying it has to be a fetish of some sorts. I do think they could stand to add a few more models with bigger butts, not Reality Kings-type, but curvier models.
Still this is high-quality porn, no matter what my negative points are, it has enough story to keep you interested if you into the story and there's seduction with having the models talk about their fantasies and thoughts out loud. My only concern would be how long it can last without changing some of the scenes? The update pace is good enough, but after downloading these current 140 scenes, there will only be 70 or so new scenes over the next year. I think if they're going to charge that premium price they need to combine this site with Blacked and Vixen.
Would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member, especially those who want 4k.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Reality Kings network and the biggest reason I return.
- A fairly popular niche these days and Reality Kings seem to put more production values in these scenes than any of their others.
- Good download speeds, about 80% of my max.
- Updates twice per month, could be more frequent, but it's not bad.
- 1080p option on all 122 scenes.
- Taking us back to these days of requiring some imagination.
Cons:
- As with the niche sites on networks, it will probably end sooner than later.
- If you're in it for the acting ability, you're going to be disappointed.
- Scenarios want to become boring
Bottom Line:
This is a fairly simple site on Reality Kings. There's not a whole lot of difference from scene to scene, but it's some of best porn being shot these days.
The premise is stepmom/aunt/stepsister catches younger sister/stepdaughter having sex with a man and joins in. These scenes are not believable. There's one where the stepmom is using the toilet while the stepdaughter is having sex in the shower, in the same room. But if you use your imagination some and enjoy voyeurism, there are some very good scenes.
A lot of what I like are the scenes where the stepmother doesn't just "stumble" up and catch them having sex. It's more like she's watching them before joining in. That's enjoyable to me. I like seeing the older models masturbating while watching. On top of that, the models on this site are almost always top-tier models.
While the two updates per month could be higher, it's better than none and each scene has pictures and videos. I once talked about the value of porn being to me, how many scenes do I keep from a site. As of today, 5/16/2017, I have every scene from this site stored on my hard drive and don't intend to delete any of them. I know that each of the other big American networks also have sites similar to this one, but Reality Kings, is adding more with their range of models.
Also helps to keep a sense of humor when watching these. You're going to see some flashbacks to 90s porn when models made over-expressive faces to help build the story, even though the over-expressiveness is what started hurting porn in the 90s. Kind of strange even. Seems like it was Reality Kings and a few others that first brought "reality porn" into the mainstream to be more believable, but now they're returning to the very style of porn they pushed out.
I would join just this site which adds a lot of value when you add the network in with. Would recommend it to anyone who likes MILF porn, voyeurism or misses 90s porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model.
Cons:
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell.
Bottom Line:
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
