Pickier, probably a little more moody about my porn too! Every once in awhile I get an urge for a certain kind of model or even an exact specific trait to the video setting. Yeah, that picky! I have this thing about the settings in pictures and videos to be realistic looking. Realistic as in, a typical room with a normal couch, not a room that has 17 different colors on the walls and a $50,000 couch. I actually think that isn't so much "picky" as it is, "odd and strange"! I am picky about the models. I rarely open my mind to new models, kind of like the old saying, "Why fix it if it isn't broke?"
I agree with Denner that us on here probably have better success since we can read the reviews, understand the terminology, such as the res of videos, which I would bet some people have no idea what res is and/or what it means. There is an idea, maybe there already is one on TBP?
Something like a common porn word glossary that explains. For example, I don't use zip files, I have a winrar which is much faster and can do 40-50 at a time, separating them into separate folders. But, if I put winrar files, I'm sure that a lot of people would have no idea that is just a newer name, newer technology of the zip system. That's me, odd, picky and strange.
I'm not for sure the exact amount but I have way more than 10 GB of Eve Angel. Her site alone has about 10 GB in videos per year if not more and it has been up 2 1/2 years. Not to mention all the other 21st Sextury content of her, DDF and nearly every other site I have found with her on them. I would estimate over 50 GB.
Hey Denner, I went ahead and downloaded all of the videos from Anette's site and compared with the videos from Twistys, all of the videos on her site are brand new, 100% exclusive to her site. Can't say for sure on the picture sets, haven't looked at all of them yet. The only thing that I would say is close to a bad thing is that 4 or 5 of the photo sets are candid/non-nude. Those are good though, it shows her sitting around and eating, one shows her cooking breakfast. It just shows a normal side to her. I should be able to get a review up this weekend since it isn't a very big site. I will be sure to check on the picture sets and make a note of it in the review.
Maybe it is just me, but I believe Anette is more comfortable in the videos on her site. She really gets into the masturbation, which is unusual for her. She usually looks bored. All of the sets are solo, no b/g, no g/g.
Most of the above members have nailed my feelings. I know that some of us were reviewing before the raffle was even a part of the site. With me, I only have a little time during T-F, so my reviews usually end up right at the end of a raffle period. I work 12 hours on T-F and am out of town one weekend per month. I enjoy talking about the sites and though my preferences are usually limited to glamour/Euro sites, the different reviews have at least helped me join a few sites outside of my usual preference.
The members who post on a lot of replies, polls, I believe are here for the reviewing and just to have some fun with a chance to win a nice prize.
As a big fan of Latinas, Adriana Sage has been a favorite for awhile. I think the last 3 or 4 actual DVDs I bought had her in them, I believe on the Vivid label. I know that most of those are a little older, early 2000s. I noticed on this solo site that it says WMV have DRM, what about the .mov files? I have only seen her in one solo set and it was great. This site is solo, so if anyone knows about the DRM on the .mov files, the information would be appreciated. I ask because the site facts says wmv are DRM and others aren't, but Spencer's review says all are DRM protected.
I was able to hold off for a few months after my last comment to join this site. I'm a huge fan of Anette Dawn. I will review it maybe next week or the week after. I've only been on it for a week so far and want to see how the updates do. The content is exclusive from what I see or at least from what I have to compare it to and the picture and video sets numbers have increased nicely since the TBP review. As of right now, there are now 27 picture sets. The size is 854x1280 and the pictures are similar quality as Twistys, which is to be expected since the site is webmastered by Shap of Twistys. The site also works the same as Twistys, you just click the little zip icon to download a zip of all pics in each set.
The videos are up to 17 now and are 720x404. She is easily one of the most seductive models in the business. The reason being, I don't even think she realizes how beautiful she is. I'm an anti-implant person, but she fits the mold similar to Eva Angelina, where they both have the build for the larger implants. From what I can see, the updates have been coming about 4 photo sets and 2 videos per month. There are no friends galleries, just Anette. Which is fine by me. I do believe she is geniunely shy as well. Last, a little jab, her age is listed as 22. She said 26 last year or the year before in a video I have! That folks is what being beautiful does, you instantly become 5 years younger! Great job so far.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A full network review, has 12 sites, every fetish you can imagine is here!
- Videos on the sites are 640 on high end and for the most part are very good and there are lots of videos up
- Pictures are available on each of the sites, some run a little below 1200, others towards 1500, but all do come in zips and most sets are huge!
- Most of the sites have some really beautiful women on them
- Definitely an original network, it is unlike any network you can join
Cons:
- Price for the entire network is around $55 for a month.
- We complain about the overuse of female models, well, these sites have about 12 guys that cover all of them from what I can see
- As with any fetish site, the content will always be repetitive after a while.
- The language is not one of 4 that I speak or understand, kind of hurts the content since I didn't get some of the fetishes, with no talking, I am lost
Bottom Line:
The score for the whole network is definitely a sum of it. Overall, the network delivers tons of fetish content. The only thing I didn't find was the really obscure fetishes like Roman Showers, which would have pissed me off if I had paid for to see!
The other sites beside the 3 top ones I reviewed separately are your typical fetishes, peeing, cumshots, 3 separate orgy sites and then the ones I ended up liking the most, the clothed sex sites. This was a whole new fetish to me. Men and women, having sex, fully clothed. I found it interesting and even erotic. What you end up with is a site that reminds you of those high school sneak overs to your girlfriend's house. She slides her shorts over, you unzip your pants and you get the picture. It also makes for a messy situation since half the time the guy cums on the woman's clothes.
Which I hear is also a fetish. This site makes me look at many things differently, I now think everyone has a closet full of fetishes!
Overall, as a network, it delivers what it promises. You get some hardcore sex with the orgy sites, you get fetish, it really is a quality network. The price is still a problem for me. I can join 2-3 sites for the price of this network. Several of these separate sites could be combined, like the orgy sites and the two cumshot sites.
I'm going to recommend the entire network only, and only if you don't mind paying the high price. It has a great preview with trailers as well. For me, one month was enough.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Last one of the sites in the Orgy Max network that I will review and probably the best.
- As is the norm for this network, 640 on high end for videos and they have a ton of these on this site, over 1,000 video clips
- Ok, I didn't know what WAM is. I still don't! This is a food fight fetish site, will explain BL
- Pictures are zipped, but are not as big as the other sites on the network, 1200 max
- Bathing/shower fetish, big deal to some!
Cons:
- Price is too high individually or as a whole network.
- Some of these videos on this site aren't as clear as the other sites, could be juice on the camera!
- This food fetish is a turn-off for me, not my thing at all
- Really can't tell who is sexy and who isn't because they are covered with food
Bottom Line:
I take it this is the most popular site on the network. I didn't join the network for this site though. I will review it since I know there are people with all kinds of fetishes.
What you get here is a room full of young women, look to be 18-21.
The videos are still not bad at all. The specs are the same, but I believe it is the whole food fight that is making the video look blurry. The girls splatter pies on each other, then lick it off. They dump pudding on each other, then lick it off, lots of touching, mud wrestling. And another fetish that is in this site is clothing, latex suits, uniforms and clothing that I don't understand, maybe it is a European thing?
I personally didn't like the site, but I can see it being a great site for those who have these aforementioned fetishes. You will see a little of everything here including bathing, seriously bathing, not fingering while bathing, but women bathing each other. Still, I can't give it a great score, because the content isn't up my alley. I don't like seeing women soaked with pudding. If you do, then you have no reason to look for another site. This is the one to join! Gooey, messy, mud wrestling, pouring pudding on each other, throwing pies at each other. It is a real fetish freak's dream come true.
Overall, I can't recommend any of the sites in this network unless you have a fetish for the content. Some of this is just a little strange for me. I'm more here for the beauty, not the pudding soaked panties.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Another of the sites in the Orgy Max network, of fetish sites.
- Movies are 640 on high end and 1400+ speed
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped
- Very believable content, true amateur feel to it
- Getting better speeds on this one than the others, almost 1400 kb/s on a 10 M connection
Cons:
- Hey, I saw that guy on the other sites! Same men from their other sites are on this one too.
- Price is a major issue with this network and even as standalone sites, this is a cheaper one by itself, but it will still set you back 30+ in dollars
- Sets are very similar, kind of a "Seen one, seen them all" feel.
- Have no idea what they are saying, not even for sure what language they are speaking. I speak and understand English, Spanish, Portugese and Italian, but have no clue on here!
Bottom Line:
I had forgot to review this network and its sites, so I will do this one too since it is one of the more popular sites in the network.
The basis, bunch of guys go to a college party or just a party with nothing but women. Give them women beer until they get naked and have a big orgy. Sounds just like college in the USA! We've been doing this stuff for years here.
One thing I want to add here is that I do like that the men in these videos do not push these women around or try to force them to swallow. They hug the women after having sex with them. They seem to be very geniune and fun-loving men, though I would think so, getting sex from 5 college women per night will make you fun-loving.
This one is a little more organized than Party Hardcore, but I'm now wondering if that is a good thing. This site's sex seems very planned. The girls though do look like that it up to them whether they have sex or not. Some of the sex is very mechanical, which I think is with the paid women. Other parts is very wild. You will see this plain average girl suddenly jump on one of the guys and give him the riding of the century! Which is where the believability of the site comes into play.
Still, unless you love a good drunk room full of girls, I can't recommend it for the price. You actually get pissed at the guys in it for not picking the one really hot woman you notice. It is probably no different than any other orgy site, except the high price. Good content, but not this high.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Fetish Network included, this site is sort of the headliner site.
- Movies are pretty good quality 640 on high end, around 1400 speed.
- If you have an exhibitionist or voyeur side this one is for you!
- Pictues were a surprise, over 1200 on high end even on old sets and are zipped
- Download speeds are just above average in the USA
Cons:
- The price! This network costs 39.95 Euros, I didn't realize there was a big difference in the Euro and Dollar, it ended up around $55 for the network for one month.
- This site itself has a great idea, but they may overuse the male stripper parts.
- The download speeds are inconsistent, going from 900 kb/s on one video to 400 kb/s on the next to 1200 kb/s on the next.
- Not enough actual sex going on.
Bottom Line:
I had seen the previews of this site for the better part of a year. My wife loves exhibitionism and voyeuristic material, and I do to a point as well. The video we had watched as previews were all action-filled 30 second clips. So, I decided to just join the entire network, instead of just one site.
The basis for this site is that there are women, usually what you would call average looking, and they are at an all male strip club. Male strippers tease them until an orgy breaks out.
Now for the problem, some of the videos are just the male strippers dancing around naked. Now this is no use to me. I'm not talking about 5 minutes, but 15-20 minutes of men dancing around while stripping. Not good.
It does get better, there are paid women there to get the women turned on. The paid women grab the male strippers and start giving them a blowjob in front of other women, who then decide to try it for themselves. This part of the video is great. Some of these women seriously blush, they look away and laugh too.
The quality is very good, videos look good and so do the pictures. There is one problem though, you have 12 male strippers having sex at one time. There is always this one really sexy woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. Other than that, this site is pretty good. I can't say I recommend it unless you are really into the group sex. Navigation is plain, scroll, click, download. If you like group sex, it is one of the best!
Definitely some moved material. I still haven't figured out where the Eve and Thomas, b/g bathroom set went. I have it saved on an old external HD and it has the 21st Sextury logo on it. It would have to be from 2003 or so. I believe the name of the video was, "Eve takes it in the bathroom". I believe that someone on here told me it is now on Eurobabes or that 21st had licensed it out and in doing so, removed it from PixandVideo. The worst thing, the picture on the opening page of the site is from that video! I do think 21st Sextury is trying to get too many sites going. The login problems are from hackers, though, if I go back to check out the newer content, my login that I had months ago is still there. I haven't been on their sites for about 6 months now. I used to join every 3-4 months. May make a trip back to ZoliBoy soon. I can't find my blasted DVDs that I burned from it.
I'm probably going to pass for now. I find myself short on time as it is. The trouble-free sites are about the only way I am willing to go these days. May, June, July are my best months for porn since I only work a half schedule at my job and can have extra time to haggle with a site. The other months, I usually just go for the ones that give me click and everything works reliability.
One thing I had noticed with Xisty and it was a reason for my higher score on their site, is that they have great content of models who I never thought looked that great on other sites. After talking with Xisty's staff away from PU, their photographer Fred, has to have something to do with this quality. Britney/Brigette had never been that impressive to me, but her Xisty content is excellent, top-level. Same can be said with Gabriella. I haven't seen her Simon Scans content, but I had seen her before. Matter of fact, I've never been a member of Simon Scans, not enough Eve content ha ha! While I don't base a membership solely on Eve's content, where I consider myself a collector of Eve's content, I at least like to know that I will get a few exclusive sets of her when I join a $30 site.
I think it just goes to show that most of these models have photographers they are good working with and others that they are not good with. In Eve's case, I noticed a very, almost excited Eve on Zoliboy's site, that I have rarely seen and her new content on Xisty is also some of the best I have seen of her.
I ended up joining the network and had meant to post a review on it. Most of what I was looking at was that my wife has a whole fetish for men being controlled. Like with all of the handjob sites that she likes. We were happy with the network, but not for more than a month and probably won't join it again. The party hardcore site ended up being kind of annoying, for both of us, since it was mostly about the strippers dancing around onstage for nearly half of the videos.
Hey SD, I agree. One thing to check out sometime, all of their sites under the "Kink" company name, including fuckingmachines have all went up in price and all now have the 10 GB per month DL limit. As crazy as this sounds, it is possible for a person on telephone line internet to download 10 GB in a month! It has to be a move of greed. If I were them, I would package 2-3 of their sites together and maybe put a premium price on it, say $40 a month. If I was that desparate for money. I had joined fuckingmachines 4 times in the past 2 years, but now they have lost me on that site too with a 10 GB monthly DL limit.
Makes me appreciate some of these other sites a lot more too!
I think the main thing she will need to do is just keep a steady update schedule going and continue the quality content. 21st Sextury for example, has in my opinion, about 50% of their content that I have never even looked at. I could say the same for Onebyday. With their re-launch, I haven't found more than say 25% of the new updates worthy of downloading. I'm not for sure if the top level models are cutting back on their work for other sites, but I'm an admitted snob when it comes to new models who really aren't separating themselves from the dozens of other new models.
Could be like I was telling Denner in another review that I've collected all of the material that I want from the top Euro sites and rarely do I find any new material on them that I want. Sort of a site burnout. When you think about it, there hasn't been any newer models in the Euro porn sites that has made herself an established star. It is still about those original 10-12 Euros being head and shoulders above the rest.
If you haven't been on there, they added a week's worth of updates right after you posted this. All of the new updates are picture sets of Eve and several are split days, you have probably seen a few like this lately on Eve's site. One day's update will be 60 pictures, the next day will be the nude parts from the set. I don't know how long I would stay around if I was on the monthly plan, but I'm on the prepaid plan and have a couple of months left. I did get an email that said Eve is on vacation or just got back from vacation, plus DDos hackers. You may remember last year when Eve and the staff seemed to take a break between November and December. The updates came 1 per week, 7 new sets at a time.
I'm like you in that I go looking elsewhere for Eve material. Have you checked out ALS Angels? It is the sister site of ALS Scan. ALS Angels had a full DVD of Eve that isn't the Viv Thomas ones. It is pretty good, some of it is studio work, posing, but it has several solo scenes as well on it. Plus they had what I would call one of the best picture sets I have seen of Eve in an orange micro-thong, using two dildos.
You already know most of the sites that she is on. Check out xisty if you haven't. They have 3 picture sets and 3 videos of Eve, videos are HD and just filmed recently. As for this site, I'm just hoping that everything picks up before my renewal comes due, because I've been on the solo site since last October and had been a few months off and on before then. I don't know if I can let her go! Hopefully my wife won't read that!
Yeah, I sent them 3 emails as business etiquette would say to stop after 3 without replies. Also notice the price difference. I am almost positive it used to be $21.95 per month, it is now $29.95. The newest Dragon Lily match is a total of 600 MB, at that rate, I would only get 15 matches before hitting the DL limit. I had to go back and check the DL limit because I thought it was 10 GB per day, but this is 10 GB per month. If you break it down, you can only download half of a match per night for the 30 days. That just seemed unfair to me. I usually won't even complain about 1 GB per day limits, but 0.3 GB limit per day for $30 a month is crazy.
Last, maybe you thought it was a daily limit since you mention the downloading everything in a night part. Like with Mike in Brazil's site, it is 1 GB per day so everyone doesn't download all of the content in one night. I can understand that for a few reasons, including stress on servers. But I will be waiting for the Ultimate Surrender staff to explain how making someone download only 10 GB in 30 days is helping them, except for the reason I believe, to make the members have to stay an extra month or two to get all the content.
No offense taken at all. I believe the site has fell into new hands that are running it, seeing the price change and DL limit.
I had considered joining this site for probably the last 8 months. I never noticed a DL limit. When I went to join, I came through TBP since I thought there was a lower price with TBP. I noticed 10 GB DL limit. I went ahead and joined and honestly just got the Dragon Lily material in a few days and never went back. I guess I should have tried to get more just to see about the DL limit. There isn't anything I could find on their FAQs about DL limit. If the limit is there, I did take off 20 points on my score in the review. I've never seen a DL limit that low before 10 GB per month is 333 MB a day. Just wondering if anyone else ran into the limit or if anyone can confirm it since I would go back if that limit isn't in place.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Dragon Lily might just be the sexiest Asian model on the planet!
- There is a strange fetish here of watching two women roll around and wrestle before having sex that makes this site very unique
- Videos are high quality, nearing HD levels and the videos are long if you watch the full match
- Some of the matches, the girls really look like they are pissed off at the other girl!
Cons:
- Friggin' monthly download limit of 10 GB. I can download 10 GB in one night. 20 points taken off score for this. That is a daily limit of .3 GB
- The majority of the matches are more about girls fingering each other while the other tries to act like she doesn't like it.
- Site can get very repetitive.
- Pictures are good quality, but they are in action pictures so they add very little
Bottom Line:
I didn't know there is a limit on this site. I am positive at one time, there wasn't a limit. If it was 10 GB per day or even 3 GB per day, I wouldn't take off anything, but 10 GB per month? I barely got all of the Dragon Lily matches before hitting my monthly limit. I won't be back.
As an ex-collegiate wrestler, this site really intrigued me since some of the girls look to at least know some grappling moves. The problem is a takedown nets say 10 points, while fingering for 30 seconds nets 100 points. So, there is very little real wrestling going on here. I noticed that the Asian models seem to have martial arts backgrounds and were actually quite impressive with their counters. Still, they don't get to fully show off this wrestling ability since they are trying to suck the other girl's boobs or finger her.
I am all for a woman fingering another, but it is a wrestling site. The matches are broken into rounds and the action looks to be based on these rounds. Round 2-3 will have some almost fingering and a little boob sucking, then round 4 will have the full on fingering. I did notice that some of the women really looked mad in their matches and were trying almost too hard to beat the other women.
The site leaves me torn. I can join a lesbian site if I just want to see fingering, but this does at least have some wrestling, but every match follows the same pattern.
I will use the DL limit as the make/break point that means, not recommended until they drop it!
Follow-Up:
Because kink.com removed DL Limit from this site and their other sites, I will raise the score back to where I said it would be without the limit, a 90.
What is really funny is the bush is thicker than their waists!
Euro butts poll would be interesting. I would vote for Eve and blame biasedness. Mia Stone is easily one of the most underrated Euros, I've tried asking a couple of different sites for her but it seems she has retired. I never realized how nice of a butt that Sophie had until I watched her video on Give Me Pink. I also would add Lora Craft who has a set with Eve on clubsandy that is one of the best butt lover sets I have seen. They take turns on their knees in front of a couch. I could go on and on, I like Tiffany Diamond's butt too, though she is small. Last, I would be tempted to write in Kayla Marie who has a great, little bit chunky butt. I think we need a site just about butts! I know there are some but they are not that great.
I've noticed in the rating systems of different sites that the skinny flat models seem to score the highest. I never will understand that!
And thank you for the review. I try to keep up with the Brazilian sites, but the best ones are Mike in Brazil and it has a daily download limit, so it was nice to get some new Brazilian content that I hadn't seen. And I agree, it is always nice to see replies to reviews. Thanks for the reply.
Sandra also has a great sense of humor. I don't know if I posted it here but when I was on her solo site before, I sent an email in and asked her if she was planning on doing any b/g scenes in the future. She has a b/g hardcore photo set out with 2 guys, but I want to see a video! I told her in the email that I had seen the video on clubsandy where she is sitting on guy's lap while he uses a dildo on her. Her reply was, "Silly, that my husband! I should never film video while horny!" She really does seem like a nice person, who enjoys what she is doing. I believe what will help Sandra's sites the most is her connections to other models. I would say in a year, if Sandra keeps everything going on these sites that the combo package of her site and Cruising Girls for $40 a month for both will be similar valued as pixandvideo w/clubsandy.
Thanks Monahan, I remember back in the early 2000s when I saw some Aria Giovanni sets that had danni's logo on them. The reviews on here vary so much on Danni that I didn't know whether to try it or not, but I think now that I will hold off. I'm already dealing with my favorite site not being very nice or helpful, last thing I need is another! Navigation is probably my biggest pet peeve when it comes to large sites. Again, thanks for the information.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Possibly the biggest updates on the internet, 5 photo sets per day AND 4 new videos per day
- Has one of the most helpful forum and webmaster that I have talked to.
- Huge amount of videos and pictures...see cons
- Has solo, b/g, g/g so it isn't as softcore as I thought it would be
- Site navigation is well above average
Cons:
- Pictures and videos are more in the quanity over quality group. Not that either looks bad, but they could be better, especially the videos.
- One very strange name usage for one model. Anetta Keys goes by Linda on here, I was a member for a week before finding her content.
- Some of the content is on other similar "niche" sites
- For some reason I am not getting good download speeds. On 10M connection, I get 600 kbp/s. Average for me is 900-1000.
Bottom Line:
I kind of feel bad giving this site "just" an 80, but some of the best content, I already have in higher quality. I loved the Anetta content once I found it under the name Linda P, Paul has 20 sets of Anetta.
The videos are starting to look bad with more and more sites seeing 640 x 480 as the norm, this one is still in the 300ish x 200ish days. It is definitely a site that focuses more on quanity than quality. I don't mean that as a bad thing, since this site would score 10 points higher if I didn't already have most of the best content on here.
The women for the most part are pretty. One thing that I didn't like about the site is the over-emphasis on "young" women. I would guess that 50% of the pic sets has the obligatory pinky between the teeth pose and I've had a problem with other sites because of this as well.
The pictures are a little above average in size, but they could maybe drop a picture set update set and get these pictures up to 2000 on the high end. The content is good overall. Though for once I found myself not following the members' reviews on the movies. I felt like I was out of place on this site.
My recommendation will come if either of these things are true for you. You are into the very cute, young models style of posing or you like one of the models on the site. Paul has an excellent preview that reminds me of Teen Dreams' preview. Check to see if there are any of your favorites, if either of these holds true for you then I recommend!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
