I said yes, my wife is Latina, she isn't bringing big boobs to the table, but she has the hips and butt.
Denner, I saw David Allen Coe back several years ago at Billy Bob's in Texas. He was there with Kid Rock, as surprising as that might sound. Love DAC's old stuff.
I had to go with "other". See, I'm getting older and now I find the whole key isn't any of those things listed. But instead, just "time" should have been one of the answers! I'll get there eventually!
One thing to remember hondaman, the reviewers that "ding" Met-Art for no hardcore, are saving people money that are only interested in hardcore. You mention that it isn't relevant, but it is to someone who has never been on the site that would be reading reviews. Interesting discussion here in the other posts. If I could humbly offer you some advice hondaman, don't mention other sites in a review and say they aren't as good. It will make some of the members question if you are trying to promote the site you are reviewing over the competition.
Otherwise, very good and thorough review for the first time.
I've done just about all of those. They still haven't gotten me with the checked boxes. I marked forgot to go back. This has happened several times when joining what I would call a "newer" or "smaller" site. I remember them about 7 hours before the subscription runs out. Sadly for me, it happened the latest time with a very big site that is expensive, 1byday. I have a couple of DDF months each year where I join Hot Legs and Feet, 1byday and one of the other DDF sites. I had forgotten that I did join 1byday, I had thought about replacing it this time with Hands on Hardcore, since I hadn't been on it in awhile. I ended up forgetting that I had joined 1byday until 3 days before the subscription ran out.
Even worse, they got me with the time zone crap. I had gotten those DDF sites on the same day that I got an Xisty account, minutes apart, and the 1byday, HL&F accounts ran out that morning, the Xisty account didn't run out until that night. Which I really think is an issue that needs to be brought up to the pay processors because they are ripping us off a day. I know, its not much, but sure enough, the very next due update on 1byday was the Zuzanna Z redhair machine set, so I'm stuck with going back and joining again, mainly for that set.
I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.
If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
02-15-0905:58pm (Update History) Reason: Lowered score 4 points to reflect a new standard for top site in my reviews
Pros:
- Re-review from my highest rated site, still up there though, the best multi-model site on the internet
- Twisty's Treats, the all-exclusive monthly series that focuses on one model, up to 36 different treats as I review this. Usually includes a minimum of 4 picture sets and 4 video sets, some of the best models in the world are in this series.
- Probably the most basic and easy to use download system going. The picture sets have a little zip icon that you click and that is it. The movies are just as easy to download as well.
- If shes a model, she most likely has content on Twistys from old favorites like Aria Giovanni to new models. You're covered!
- Pictures are 1280 high end, most videos are 640 high end
- Daily updates that includes 4 picture sets and 1 video daily
- Bonus exclusive sites only sweetens the deal, Anette Dawn and the newly add Nicole Graves are sites I have joined before they were part of the Twistys network and Blue Fantasies as well, will explain in BL
Cons:
- Some of the older sets are not as good of quality, probably about 1% of the content falls in this low quality group, and most of those are from the early 2000s.
- There is some airbrushing, but it is a glamour site, and most glam sites do airbrush, just mentioned it if that bothers you
Bottom Line:
You know things are good when I ran out of characters in the pros section! I didn't get to mention the price of $19.95. How many sites update 4 photo sets and 1 video set daily but only charge $19.95? Those bonus sites are more than just throw ins. Now that the Nicole Graves site has been added, there are 3 bonus free sites with your membership that I have paid to join just those sites in the past.
The score may seem high, but I rated Twistys a 93 by itself before the bonus sites were added, I rated Anette Dawn's site an 84, I think and Blue Fantasies a 90, Nicole's site would be a 90 as a solo site. That's $100 worth of sites that average a 90 for $20. I may not be complimentary enough with my score of a 98.
I do want to say that I know that glam isn't everyone's cup of tea or whiskey, but for the type of site they advertise themselves as, they do it better than anyone, quality, quantity, ease of downloading, speed of downloads, price, tons of updates. This is to me, the standard for sites to be judged by.
Throw in that there is a forum where Shap (webmaster) regularly visits and posts, contests, Shap listens and is constantly adding to the site's appeal. There also is a DVD section if you like hardcore that has over 100 full length DVDs in it. Nicole's site has some hardcore as well.
I think if Twistys has one fault, it isn't theirs. It is that they are the standard bearer and sorry to say it, but people these days want to rip the top dog. Also known as "hating on" in the kids slang these days.
The Treat of the Month is my favorite part. With 36 models just in that section alone, all-exclusive by the way, you can get a month's worth of content just from that section! Out of the 36 treats, I have every picture set and video set saved on my HD, even the interview clip from each model.
I also have all of the Anette Dawn content as well.
Videos are 640 in most cases, there are a few, including the Aria Giovanni ones that are lower quality, but there is a chance you won't even run into the lower quality ones from 5 years ago. I've always talked about how well I like the zip system they use, I like click, download.
Blue Fantasies is a nice very glam bonus site that several of us PU had joined on its own.
Those daily updates are also some of the best in the industry. So, lets do a checklist here. Multiple daily updates - check, huge archive - check, easy to use - check, some exclusive content - check, above average quality - check, models from all around the world - check, customer support is fast and helpful - check, webmaster listens and constantly improves site - check.
Hopefully that does explain the high score. Everything we complain about with other sites, are non-issues here and again, the price is only $20. I join using the multi-month option that drops the price to $10 a month. I've been a member for a total of 27 months over the last 3 years, and a member for the last 18 months straight. Easily recommended!
I couldn't agree more. I always considered myself a video guy, but that was before finding Eve's solo site, while her videos are some of the best solo on the internet, her picture sets back in 2006 were and still are some of the best I've seen. May have more to do with her than anything else, but even now, I find myself joining sites because I like the color/lighting they use in their picture sets. Xisty comes to mind in their exclusive sets. Speaking of, they have 3 new Eve sets, so maybe she hasn't retired or gone away and was only taking a vacation. Babelicious also has a new set coming just in time for my birthday!
I've developed a new system. I go to freeones or one of the TGP sites and try to find samples of my favorite models from the site that I am considering joining. I won't post the the link, but Tiava's TGP is really good for doing a search by model's name and you can even search the site's name to find the samples the site has on there. I've found these samples, usually dozens of them per site, to be better than the samples the sites have in their preview.
As far as the content goes, I usually look at the picture samples to see the "style" of colors they use. Getting picky, I know, but I really prefer the warm color sets.
Hey Drooler, I haven't seen any on there that are 1280. I still can't tell the exact dimensions of the newest ones that I have, which would be from summer, but looks to be in the 650 range and are mp4 files instead of .avi
Makes me wonder about the pictures, that poll has been there since July. The sad thing is, because more members are into the videos, they will focus more on the videos than the pictures. Though, I am usually 50/50 on pictures/videos. I have always loved the color and lighting in the 21st Sextury pictures. I will probably join again next month since I've all but ran out of sites to join.
I like bangbros better, they seem to focus more on butts than boobs. Though it is repetitive as well. I do like their site Ball Honeys that comes with the network though.
Hey Drooler, yeah, I usually do try to get the sites that use ccbill or paycom or even VXS, but to get the special deal at Brazzers for $10 a month, I take it you can only sign up directly through them. There wasn't any mention of a payment processor on the welcome email. It is similar to how Karups PC is with a link to go to.
What I thought was funniest though, I'm sitting there answering their poor attempts at making me want to stay, "Make the worst decision in your life" I wanted to believe it was humor, but I really felt like they were trying to play some kind of emotional/mental game like the one that said "I would rather download poor quality content for more money". Kind of like those pop-up ads that say, "Click ok if you want to close, and receive a lifetime membership to gay sites". I mean, what if the person reading that ad is gay? They are clicking ok over and over! Figures, now that the dollar's value is going back up, gas prices are dropping, porn is dropping off too.
On my most recent subscription to Brazzers, just now canceled, I did not think I was ever going to get the damn thing to cancel. First, the newer content isn't a step up. The sites have become incredibly repitive. The video quality isn't much better either. But, what I mainly wanted to tell is to be careful when trying to cancel. This is possibly the worst cancel system I have seen. Don't get me wrong, I like these guys and their discounts, but here is what I went through. Clicked, "Cancel" link in original email from site. This takes me to their site, where I sign in. I sign in, it makes me an offer to stay for a 1 time charge, 6 months for $48 and some change. I clicked "No" but wait, offer 2 stay for 1 month for $14.95 per month. Eh, I joined it for $10 a month! The option says, "Yes I want this great deal" or "No, I want to continue downloading second rate content elsewhere". I clicked no. Wait, a 3rd offer! This time $8 and some change per month, my option besides yes is "No, I want to make the worst decision of my life". Yeah you didn't know my first wife! But seriously, this is where it could catch people off guard. Once you go through all of these screens, it says they retreived your information. And NOW you have to click cancel AGAIN. If you don't the membership continues, that is 5 clicks on cancel or "no" when they ask if you want a special offer. That's a little much to go through, in my opinion.
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
If you like oral, facials and beautiful women, nearly all of them are top level in looks, you will love this site. I'm surprised it hasn't had more coverage here!
I had this happen to me on Eve Angel's site last year. The payment processor said that there is only a certain amount of months they can recur your account, without opening a new account. I don't know if this is some kind of new rule or maybe it could even depend on who you have your card with, they could be stopping it after so many months since there are so many scams these days that charge a person's card every month without them even noticing. The limit on mine was 12 months, after that, I had to go back and re-register. So, I wouldn't count on it being VB's fault. I know there has been a scam going where a place calls and says you have won X amount of free gas, to confirm your birthday, by pressing it in and somehow, they then have you "confirmed" into a coupon club that costs $15 a month. Then again, you aren't likely to get an answer from VB, I've sent them a dozen or so support mails over the years and never received a reply.
Which site did you join through? I have been a member two times, joining through tasty pass, not any of the individual sites, and I have larger resolution videos. The tasty pass sign up page doesn't even give a trial option. I'm wondering if they are using lower quality videos for the trial? I have around 42 videos from the Tasty Tara site and all are at least 740 high end, some are even approaching 900 high end. The videos I have from Tasty Julie are a minimum 640 high end. I'm mainly asking if it is possible that they aren't letting trial members have the full size videos. My main interest in the site is Tasty Tara, and I found the quality of content on her site to be well above average.
Hey Cybertoad, now that is a great review! I haven't seen this site, I do know of Catalina, but didn't know she had her own site until you mentioned it and I also see that Jessica Jaymes is on that network, and I have always liked her. Not to mention Sienna. I will check this out, I'm always looking for a new site or network to join.
I just noticed this review after you mentioning for me to comment on your reviews. Does the site have zips for pictures? That is a big selling point. How big are the pictures, the resolution? What resolution and bitrate are the videos? When you mention the older videos are not as good, you say the format isn't as good. What format are they? Is it the resolution or bitrate or both that is bad on the old videos?
Most of all though, you say this isn't the best site of this network, which is the Brazzers network, but in your reviews, it is the highest rated by you, which site from the network is better?
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- To me, Eve is the greatest of the solo models. Don't think that is unfair bias from me, I just have preferences and she fits all of them. Long dark hair, very shapely natural body, seductive eyes, and most of all, as a solo model, her masturbation scenes are generally some of the most believable on the internet.
- Video quality is good 640 high end with 2000 bitrate
- Picture quality is also good with full size photos coming it at 2000 high end, also has option to download smaller res pictures at 1200 high end. Pictures are in zips as well.
- Large amount of content for a solo site, over 80 GB just of Eve videos! About 60 GB of friends content. Around 350 video clips total and similar amount of photo sets
- That $15 TBP price is perfect for a month
- DL speeds are generally average or above
Cons:
- The worst con possible, Eve is no longer on the site. It is now recycling the first year's content from the archive and releasing it as new. On a side note, the new friends content, some of it is new to THIS site, but this site should be looked at as a archival site. Daily updates? Sure, of content released 3 years ago.
- This site's cons are very low. Quality is there, price is great, Eve is incredible, quantity is as high as many multi-model sites. The only major one I have heard is that Eve can be repetitive in her masturbation videos. But then again, when you join a solo site with a model who no longer does b/g scenes, what more can you expect? I've never tired of this content.
- Last month or two of 2007, updates are cut in 2 parts
Bottom Line:
Going back to my first review here on PU. This site to me is still well worth a one month join for those who have never joined it before. I went back for one reason and will explain so others can watch for it. Several video files in the early part of 2007 are corrupt, if you go back, you can download the .mov files of those and those work fine. I also had downloaded only the small picture zips for the year of 2007, so I wanted to get the big resolution versions.
I had a membership here for nearly 2 years, and loved every minute of it. The content can be repetitive, but so is eating pizza everyday, and I'd do that if not for the damage to my health. My point being, Eve is beautiful enough that repetitive is a good thing. I was reading some of the comments left by members and replied to by Eve. One of her last ones showed frustration when she says, "I had another set, but you all not want to see that skirt again". Like I said before, I could care less if she wears a potato sack.
The quality here is still well above average on the videos and pictures, if you join it, you can tell that at one time, this was the premier solo site on the internet. Now, it is the premier site to get Eve content. Over 200 videos of Eve and over 200 picture sets of Eve for $15? That is a great deal for Eve fans.
One other thing that I mentioned in the cons, the last month of 2007, the picture sets are split into 2 updates, as are the video updates. Believe me, that is frustrating with Eve. She takes a whole clip just to tease and get naked!
I honestly thought I would lower the score more than I did, but as a 1 month join, you just can't do much better than this site. It really is near perfect, except for the fact that the new content is from the 2005 archive.
Still is highly recommended, especially for solo fans and/or Eve fans. You aren't going to find much b/g here and the b/g you find will not have Eve in it, though there are maybe 30 g/g videos of Eve and her friends. The "important" checklist shows why this site still scores high. Zips...check, better than average resolution and bitrate movies...check, better than average picture resolution...check, really hot main model...check!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
