Great first review Monty, this is also one of my favorite network sites and the glasses was my original attraction to the network. I also preferred this network to the comparable ones since they weren't stuck on the big fake boobs models only. I've noticed that to get good lesbian content, you just about have to go to a lesbian only site, some of the DVD sites also won't post many lesbian clips since their members aren't as interested.
Nubiles is quickly becoming one of my favorite sites and this really doesn't change that, but the TBP price shows 5 month access for $85. Once on the site, going through TBP link, the discounted monthly price is still there, but the multi-month deal is $85 for 120 days or 4 months, not 5. Just thought I would mention that.
I didn't have that problem. I did the full tour, mainly because I was wanting to see if they had added the full zips yet (this was last week), and then clicked "Join Now" and received the discount. I actually had planned on posting a re-review of the site in the next few days that will be adding +4 to my original score.
I'm not really for sure what the difference is between "E-ticket supplier and access management" and "Authorized Sales Agent" is. They have Epoch and VXS listed as Authorized Sales Agent. You can send them a question, I think, if you go to their site and click "Customer Support" down near the bottom of the page, then click "Submit a ticket" you have to give them your email address to do this, but you could probably ask them the question there and get an answer. Their customer service usually answers very fast, from my experience with them.
I just clicked the comment to post a comment about the full set zips. I haven't downloaded any of them yet, but will be sure to check them with the WinRar software as I download them. I'm starting to think that $20 on WinRar to replace WinZip was one of my best investments!
I have been to a couple of them. One of the reasons, I searched google for a porn scene by file name and it took me directly to one of the tube sites that had it. Most of the content that I have seen on them is either old, easily attainable on the DVD sites or it isn't the full scene.
lk2fireone, I don't really want to promote them, but the ones I have seen have tube in the name and have the name of a color in front of tube and some are not so subtly just putting part of this site's name, the genre of movies in front of tube. I do think some of them are pretty legit since they look to allow websites to upload samples of their content and some even will have a full scene that says, "Compliments of" and tell the site's name.
I'm just a little concerned though with the security aspect of connecting to these sites.
I did a review of this same network just a few days ago, and had a chance to go through the content I downloaded. A few things, there are full scene downloads on some of the movies. I have 3 Georgia Jones ones that are full scenes, and just from glancing at the files I have, I would estimate around 30% of the videos are full scenes. I only mention that because your review says all videos are split. Here are a few of the full scenes by filename.
I do agree though on most everything else, I'm not really for sure on the exclusive part as some of the sets are from New Sensations, and I think they can probably claim those as exclusive since New Sensations owns this network. Just thought I would mention that about the full clips.
You read it right, Teen Dreams is full of content, but some of the content is licensed, which means it can be found on other sites too. The quality of the videos, bitrates and resolution isn't as high as In Focus and really In Focus' quality is higher in all aspects, photos and videos, but Teen Dreams is going to be more content and a much bigger selection of models. ATK Galleria is similar to Teen Dreams, tons of content. I have an ATK membership right now and from scanning the model index, I'm counting roughly 2,240 different models.
Both Teen Dreams and ATK Galleria have been around close to or more than 10 years. My thinking was a site with more models and more content would be a good place to start to kind of get a feel for the models and which ones you like best. Oh and one advantage to Teen Dreams, they have bonus content of Viv Thomas Videos which are some of the more hardcore Euro videos on the internet and you can download them, not just stream like most bonus sites are.
I don't think this once great site has been updated in awhile, the last time I was there, they were recycling content that had already been posted and that was probably 8 months ago.
See Carey, I had a feeling this was going to go this way.
First, you are not required to read my posts if you don't like them or if they are not rhetorical enough or too rhetorical for you and Demosthenes.
Second, you say to keep perspective. You submitted this poll question, and haven't even posted your stance on it. So, for you to say that you were not advocating babies in a furnace, really has no meaning whatsoever, you haven't advocated either side of this very topic! A few of the members even showed some curiosity towards the topic, but you still didn't expand on it, explain it, or give your opinion. The question also does not give your stance away.
Third, you submitted a poll question, meaning you wanted opinions on this topic. I gave my opinion and for whatever reason, you admit in this (#19) reply that you were being a bastard towards me because of my opinion, which must differ from yours, even though I had no clue what your opinion was, see your words, "You're the only one on PU permitted to be a bastard?"
Fourth, of my hundreds of replies, which you are of course free to skip over, I've never been called a bastard or thought I replied in other way except to be helpful or to joke around with the member I replied to.
Of course you aren't going to argue my 2nd post, you would prefer playing flame wars like we were in the 5th grade. If my stance on the point hasn't been clear, it is nothing more than a rule that nearly all businesses have. It asks soldiers to "Not tell your sexual preference and we won't ask". Now, somehow this became about gays, but the rule is saying no one tell, so it isn't just about gays, until the wonderful American media put their typical sensationalistic twist on it and made it into discrimination. Rosa Parks, Dr. King, Jackie Robinson and millions of others roll in their graves about what is considered discrimination these days in America.
I agree with the others, as I prefer In Focus to Only Cuties. I always thought the biggest difference since both are owned by the same company, is that In Focus has more of the curvier models, mid to late 20s, Only Cuties seems to be more slimmer and less busty and the 18-21 range. My biggest reason for joining Only Cuties was Cindy Hope/Klaudia, who you can see in the preview on the main page at the bottom in a hardcore, reverse cowgirl position.
I haven't had any problems with Vista and this site, but I do know that a member posted last week about having trouble playing Sapphic Erotica videos, also owned by Only Cuties and In Focus company, and if you run into that get a VLC player since some of the newer ones have different codecs than the Windows Media Player plays, VLC is free if you haven't tried it.
I'm not for sure if this would be the place I would start if new to Euro porn. New usually means you don't have the licensed content, so I would probably start with a site with more of the models so you could get familiar with the ones you like the best, a site like Teen Dreams or ATK Galleria, for quantity. One problem you might run into on any Euro model site is that hardcore isn't that common. Most of the Euro models have a few early in their career hardcore shoots, then they move to solo and g/g.
Really, one way to get some of the best Euro models in hardcore, if you are a member of any of the DVD sites like VB, look up the series, Legal Skin and check out the Euro versions, VB has several of those and are mostly b/g hardcore.
That isn't an advertisement, he is telling members that it is a good deal, which is what we do in comments. Which you just wasted a comment on telling the staff that you think they should remove a comment. Panther has been here for awhile and that lets us know that he is just tipping us off to a good deal.
Carey, you dummied down my entire post. The post is about sexuality, not gender and the situation was hypothetically asked, not something that was tried to be seriously passed.
In life, a male or female is based on their reproductive organs at birth. Over time, puberty strikes and sexuality is born.
Somewhere around this point, it is not okay for males and females to take showers together. It really isn't just because one has a dick and one doesn't. It is because of the possible bad situations that could come from it. Most likely, but not completely, based on the males possibly sexually assaulting the females.
Going by that, if a gay man, who is sexually aroused by naked men is allowed to stand in a room full of naked straight men and get his jollies, then it is no different, hypothetically, then a straight man standing in a shower room full of nude women, getting his jollies.
Oh and by pointing out gender, it does go against the very question that was asked since homosexuals blur the line that gender is defined by. A gay man is a man by gender because of his penis, but is attracted to the same things sexually that a female is attracted to.
I voted no. I voted based on experience. I don't think anyone should have any rights taken away based on their sexual preference, but that can work both ways in a military setting. I will post the experiences so you all can think about these.
A co-worker of mine came out of the closet a few years ago. No one treated him any differently. Breaks at work, he is still hanging out with us straight people, as he jokes about, and he gets all the rights we do. Nothing changes in this setting.
When in college, as a football player, two players came out of the closet to a couple of players, not all. It was a school in the deep south of the United States, and truth was, most everyone on the team "thought" they were gay, but never said anything. As word started spreading, problems started coming up. These two players were never picked on for being gay, one was a 290 pound Defensive Linemen with what we called a "Mean streak" so maybe that played a part in him not being made fun of, but the other one was small in build and he was never picked on either. We still would hang out after practice, grab a pizza and do everything we always did.
BUT when it came time for showers, things became uncomfortable. Some of the straight players would say they wondered if the gay players were looking at them, the gay players even said it made them uncomfortable because you could see that some of the straight players were uncomfortable being nude around the gay players and they didn't want to do that either by coming out of the closet.
It caused problems, and though I don't think most people would look at the situation and think anything about it, it is much different when put in that position. I remember one of the straight players even saying, "Would I be allowed to shower with the female cheerleaders?" and he had a good point. That would be seeing your sexual preference nude.
The military also has times like this shower time that could cause problems for the straight soldiers, so the compromise of don't ask, don't tell, to me, was a good one based on my experience in a very similar situation. Just a different view than what most would say.
I didn't know how to reply. High school crushes weren't really an option, most of them are in jail or had 12 kids. Spent most of my high school years at Dominguez, trust me 12 kids and jail was a good girl!
Not really many celebs come to mind, maybe Jessica Alba and Alyssa Milano in a Viv Thomas production?
I marked other, our neighbors are pretty, two UCLA college girls, but the last thing I need is to start feeling like an old pervert at 34, even though my wife says I am.
Other, my Philosophy professor in college. She was probably 40, I was about 21, and I might have just imagined this, but I could have sworn she once crossed her legs and had on thigh high stockings with garters! But she would now be around 60, so I really didn't have a sure answer.
I ran into that same page last month and thought the prices had gone up, and just now checked and my prices were listed as the ones you are seeing too, but ran CCleaner and it went back to the regular prices of:
Nice detailed review, my latest trip to Brazzers was not that good. One thing, you mentioned "virtually every porn star of note", outside of HQ Honeys, I didn't see hardly any stars outside of American models. I think they might have pigeonholed themselves too much as almost only American models. Reality Kings has Mike's Apartment which features almost all Euro models and another Euro sex party site as well.
I think Brazzers has dropped off from my last review of their network, but that is just my opinion.
As I was about to click "complete transaction" I noticed something, now, this was BELOW the complete transaction button.
Your membership also includes free access to these sites:
One Thousand XXX Vids* Top Adult Pass **
Keeping in mind, this is a network of multiple sites, so it isn't that crazy to think a site would list which sites you get free with your membership, but those asterisks jumped out at me, I scrolled, not once, but twice to get the asterisks explanation.
"* If not cancelled within the two day Free trial period, your subscription will automatically renew at thirty nine dollars ninety one cents per month."
"** If not cancelled within the two day Free trial period, your subscription will automatically renew at thirty nine dollars ninety one cents per month."
How nice, didn't even put the price in numbers to try and catch us sleeping! Wouldn't it have been much easier to put $39.91 instead of spelling it all out? Of course not, numbers would be too noticeable. This is probably the worst pre-checked cross sales I have seen. You join a pretty good network for $12.49 but end up paying ninety-two dollars and thirty one cents or $92.31. Definitely should be some kind of rule or law about the pre-checked cross sales being above the complete transaction button, and now, I'll take a pass on the network.
Hey Denner, I re-joined this site last week, they have some Eve Angel content, which really surprises me, though Eve is a great tease when she wants to be, she usually is known for more than just tease. I will write a re-review in a week or two of it, I do notice that they now have what they call "Prestige" sets that are released only on Fridays that look to be a little more skin than the regular sets. My other reason for joining, their collection of Gemma Massey is up to 52 sets! Seems like it was only in the 20s when I was a member before. Just from a glance, some of the Eve pictures are showing full nudity, I just don't know yet how far those go, but will let you know in the re-review.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
03-18-0901:51am (Update History) Reason: I put it cons, some videos are split into parts, DL manager was set to download .wmv, and didn't realize those were just parts
Pros:
EDIT: Reason in cons
- 18 different network sites, most are solo sites and some are very good, trial for $10 works, full trial.
- Numbers vary between sites, newest site is Georgia Jones and the sets of pictures I have downloaded are 1440 high end, most of the other sites are 1280 high end, all sites NOW have zips for pictures. Will explain in BL
- Videos are not the focus here, but each site has 4-5 videos, usually solo of each model and are 720 high end.
- Holy cow, a network with good navigation, on the New Sensations brand at that? Navigation is smooth, one column on the left has each sites name in it, click it and go, no re-signing in, that easy!
- Definitely some of the best models on the internet, Aneta Keys, Susana Spears, Georgia Jones, Bree Olson and 14 more.
- Good download speeds
Cons:
EDIT: Lowered score 6 points, though the videos are not the focus here, as I was going back and looking through them, I realized the videos are split into parts, not all, but some are. The site is very DL manager friendly, and I hadn't realized those videos were split. Some of the content is so non-exclusive that they THANK the site that leased it to them.
- Would like to see more content, updates, the updates are spread out and never explained. I almost look at this as more of an archive like site.
- They fixed the no zips problem, I had reviewed this network under the Aneta Keys site name before they named it the "Pornstar Key Network" maybe more exclusive content would be the next step to improving this network. There is some exclusive content, several of the Georgia Jones sets are her newer sets with the subtle red highlights in her hair.
Bottom Line:
Sort of an unbalanced pros/cons list. There really isn't much to complain about considering the site's good trial price, 5 days for $10, the content is very good, though many of the older sets are licensed, seen it a million times sets like Aneta Keys in braids. I'm pretty sure every porn site on the internet has those sets. Still, there are some exclusive sets, since Georgia and Aneta are two of the models I collect, here are the amount of sets I didn't have of those two to show the exclusivity of the site.
Aneta Keys 23 exclusive photo sets that I don't have, 3 videos I don't have.
Georgia Jones 14 exclusive photo sets I don't have and 3 videos I don't have.
Now, for all I know those could be on other sites, but being a regular member of Twistys, Teen Dreams and once a year member of ATK's sites, I would think I would have them if they were licensed. One of the Georgia sets is really great, in pink leather type crotchless panties, hose and heels.
There also is an Evelyn Lory site on here, I can't say on the exclusive sets, since I stopped collecting her content last year, but the models overall are a very good selection of top level models, both European and American.
Almost feels like a greatest hits cd in music. All of the models are worth checking out. They have added a few more sites Pornstar Angels, which looks to be mostly licensed content and Jimmy Canon, which is sort of a multi-model site that focuses on pictures, I guess Canon = Camera.
A few other solo models, Mili Jay has a site with around 40 sets and a handful of videos, Jana Cova as well.
What it looks like is we've all seen those cheap solo sites that you join and get 30 picture sets, 5 videos and pay a premium $30 price for it. This looks like 15 of those combined into one network, which makes it a really good deal to me.
When I first reviewed this network it was under the name Simply Anetta Keys, they've changed hers to anettakeys.org, so maybe they are trying to give off a new image of their network.
I was very impressed with the navigation. This network moves seamlessly from one site to the next with one click, which is even more surprising since this is a New Sensations site and they are known for terrible navigation.
I'm impressed overall, I like the trial, I usually don't use those, but since I had been a member before, it is nice to pay a reduced price to be able to go back and get the new sets. I was surprised to see a Georgia Jones site, especially one with 20+ photo sets and 5 videos, I think Georgia is one of the real stars of the near future if used right. When I was on this network before, some sites had zips, others didn't, Aneta's didn't, but they all do now and to me that is a big step up in improvement.
As I end, I still can't say the exact amount of exclusivity of all the sites, but for that low trial price it is well worth the money, especially Georgia and Aneta fans. Recommended!
I put "not for me". I think a big part of the interest in bondage and the very rough sites and their enjoyment of their viewers depends on how the viewer was raised, type of environment, etc..
Growing up in the Belly of the Beast, South Central, Los Angeles in the 80s, has turned me completely against most things that even approach violence. I still hear women screaming from being assaulted or finding their son with his head blown off, so I have trouble with any site that could even start to make me think the woman is in any pain.
And similar to what Jay G says, I don't ride thrill rides, I've never bungee jumped or sky dived. As a kid, I used to have to go to the pharmacy to get my grandfather's diabetic medicine, and it was a run for my life most of the time. Kid carrying a $50 bill in an impoverished neighborhood filled with crackheads with guns.
Once we moved out of there, I never looked for an adrenaline thrill again. Having said that, I have joined several of the kink.com sites, and do like their content, I'm not even for sure that it falls in much more than very light bondage though.
I don't want to come off as haughty or anything like that, but I do want to point out a few things and hope that you will understand that if nothing else, I am only defending my score of Twistys.
To start with, you mention the two bonus sites you went to. Those are network type sites that twistys should not be advertising as separate sites, unless they want to call Twistys the main page and take the content off Twistys, which they could do. But Anette Dawn, Blue Fantasies and Nicole Graves sites are 100% exclusive, none of the content is shared with Twistys and you get those 3 with a Twistys membership. You don't even have that listed as a pro, but have the others listed as a con. Maybe you reviewed it from a trial and didn't have time to check all the sites out?
Next is that I know of Twistys has never sold itself as a hardcore site. So, I don't see why you would take off for their lack of hardcore. I used this comparison before with another member, it would be like going to a hot dog stand and being mad because they don't have pizza.
One big reason that I point that out is because your highest rated site is 1byday, a site that is pretty much identical to Twistys in content. At the most, I remember 1byday having hardcore Fridays on their site last year and before then for awhile, but they rarely have more than 1 hardcore set per week, so why would you take off twistys score for not enough hardcore, but not 1byday's score?
I will agree that Twistys picture size should be bigger, but I won't agree about the video size, their standard for a couple of years or more has been 640-720 high end with 2000+ bitrates, that is above average quality. And if you look at 1byday, while their newer content is 1280 high end, their older content is 440 high end.
The part though that jumped out at me the most was when you made the comment about twistys models, I hate to tell you, but I would estimate that more than 90% of the models on 1byday are on twistys. Plus twistys has American models that 1byday doesn't, like Georgia Jones, Nicole Graves, Jessica Jaymes, Brea Bennett just to name a few.
This is the best way for me to say this.
1byday updates at best with 4 sets per day, and that isn't that common these days, it is more like 2 new sets per day as they split the updates with remastered sets. Twistys has 4-5 updates per day, probably half or more are exclusive. 1byday has no bonus content. Twistys has 3 exclusive bonus sites listed above. Twistys has at least 90% of the models 1byday has plus many American models 1byday doesn't have. Both sites have similar hardcore content. Twistys $19.95, 1byday $34.95.
Would have helped a lot if you had a review of 1byday and not just a rating. I would like to see the cons and how they compare to twistys.
Sitting right on 85, I'm using something similar to a college professor using a grading curve. I've only reviewed 2-3 sites below 70 out of 150 or so sites, so I have 70 as my low mark, the few I have graded below 70 was because of serious issues like false advertising about content in preview. So, my scores tend to fall between 70-100, and 85 is right in the middle. I remember explaining once that most of the sites I have reviewed here are sites that I've been a member of more than once, so I obviously liked the site enough to join a second time, so I recommended it to myself. And the only way I take risks on sites is if they have content of one or two of my favorite models, which in turn means it will most likely score at least around 80.
I wouldn't have a problem wearing a t-shirt with TBP or PU logo on it. I'm usually in California or Florida, Florida might freak out in the northern areas, but shouldn't be a problem at all in California.
We see people wearing funny sexual shirts all the time. This girl was buying some gas, when I noticed her bumper sticker, "My other car is a Sybian" to the more obvious shirts "Yes, those are boobs and they are real" to the ever funny liberal crossdressing men, "Real Men Wear Crotchless Panties" and my favorite of all, I saw a man, probably 70 or older with a shirt on that said, "College Girls > Viagra"
I agree that the new format 21st Sextury is using is confusing, but they have improved it some. I went through the whole process of finding the site that had the most sites I wanted with it. I didn't realize it is much easier than I thought it was. Here is how you do it.
Go to a site on their network that you are interested in. Click "Full Network" once that opens up, look over at your right, you will see a dropdown box, if you click it and scroll down, it lists all the sites you get instant access to. If you keep scrolling it will tell you the order you get the loyalty sites, 2 per month that you stay as a member.
You can also look just above the samples and it now tells you how many sites you get instantly by number and how many loyalty sites you can get.
I joined through zoliboy and got 35 sites instant access, including this one, Lezbo Honeys, Footsie Babes, Sweet Sophie Moone, Playful Hands about 8 sites that are really good, the other 27 are okay at best. Still, with 8 really good sites for $30, that became a good deal for me. On a side note, the ones that looked to have the worst bonus sites were Club Sandy and Pix and Video.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
