Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very realistic and believable amateur site.
- Really pretty women considering the nature of the site, also see a blend of races and shapes.
- Videos are clear, but have to go premium to get the 1080p videos, my membership came with 720p as the top option. Which is fine with me.
- Download speed is above average, the newer releases seem to take a little longer to download.
- The scenes are generally long (40-50 minutes).
- Bonus access to Girls Do Toys, BTS content and interviews.
- From the best I can tell they update weekly, this leads into the cons that others have pointed out too.
Cons:
- What the hell is going on with this site's navigation? I'm glad I was OCD before joining it, otherwise, it would have made me OCD. I'll go more into this in the bottom line.
- No pictures? If there are pictures I can't find them.
- Premium upgrade for the 1080p, I honestly wish sites would just remove that option since it makes me feel like I'm missing out on something. Hey, blame the OCD from the navigation!
Bottom Line:
Okay, I really like this site. It's repetitive, but the models are the draw. I don't recognize hardly any of these women from other sites or from DVDs, there could be some though. I don't mind the silly premium upgrade part, it's just I don't understand why sites are going to it. I will be really frustrated if I find out there are pictures if you upgrade, otherwise, they lose 5 points for no pictures. What's the point of amateur girls if you don't show them in their regular clothes and have a little tease?
This site's navigation isn't the worst I've seen, but it's confusing. When you click a scene to download or stream, 12 more scenes pop up directly under the streaming video. It reminds me of the scene cutter Videobox uses except the content is just other models. There's no names on the models. The filenames are numbers. Give me some organization please. There's no model list since there's no model names. Do they maybe have multiple scenes of certain models or no?
Having said that, that's all that's wrong with this site. It's a lot since I now have a folder with a bunch of unidentifiable files in it, but the content is very good. It's slightly irritating since I'm not the first person who has complained, which means they most likely have no plans to correct it.
Instead of something easy and logical, you'll find 33 pages of videos with 12 models per page, unless you look through them from the main page where you'll find 49 pages of 8 models. Jeez.
Back to the models, late teens, early 20s, skinny, athletic, well-built (butts and boobs), white, black, mixed, Asian, Hispanic, it's a dream come true for someone like me. Of course I could say I want to see some more built models and maybe some slightly heavier ones, but overall, these models are what I like. Now, if I just knew their names so I could find them when I'm looking through the folder of numbered files.
I don't know if my score is that fair. I know I generally rate higher, but a lot of that is based on my own problems with understanding the difference between a 50 and a 70. I'm rating it above average for me just because of the models. The amateur aspect does bring in some of those scenes where it's way too clear that the model is just there for the money, not to enjoy the sex. And while I'll agree and understand that, it does hurt some of the appeal.
With all the navigation issues, I'd still recommend it for a month, if you like amateur models, you'll probably love this site, would go another 10 points on the score if they did something with the navigation, model names and added photos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High production values interracial site.
- Updates twice a week, has 222 total updates as of 6/13/2017.
- Good download speeds and it's needed since the videos are large.
- Some good creativity in the scenes, but does tend to lean towards the interracial stereotypical porn.
- Much like Tushy, the models here are nearly all top-level in looks.
- Scenes at least do have some story to them.
Cons:
- No idea what's going on with their navigation, but it's really annoying. I click a scene to download, my ability to use the back browser button goes away, so I have to go back to "videos" and scroll through until I find my place.
- Maybe it's just me, but I expected to see some scenarios different from cuckold and cheating wife.
- Also much like Tushy, the scenes don't have a lot of oomph factor.
- Maybe my biggest complaint, quit having the models looking at the camera during sex!
Bottom Line:
A lot of cons for an 85 site, but some of those cons are personal ones that might not bother anyone else. I'll go into that last one, at least half of the scenes I've watched, the model in the middle of sex, is looking back at the camera. I understand that they're very pretty models and all, but are they having sex or posing for pictures?
The action is fairly repetitive throughout. It's not bad by no means, but you'll be able to predict what's going to happen next. Cuckold and cheating wife interracial porn. And now my back button no longer works on their site.
Okay, I've complained enough. This content is good, the technical quality is very good and the models really are some of the prettiest models I've seen. I do enjoy the little stories, usually spoken (assuming) by the model, which always adds some sexiness to it.
There's quite a bit of content here too. By my count, 222 scenes (photos and video with each) and the photos are professional quality, which can be a negative or positive depending on which you prefer.
I'm going to be blunt in saying I won't join either Blacked or Tushy again. I think the content is bland overall.
Still, Blacked serves a niche. Really pretty models doing interracial. This used to be fairly uncommon in porn. The navigation of the site is just fine. You can scroll through or search by model or by tags. But maybe it's my browser, clicking to download a scene removes my back browser button option. That's a real pain which definitely doesn't help my feelings towards the site.
This is one of those sites that I think newer porn fans will like. It has the high technical quality, the videos are sharp and crisp. The pictures look like they came out of a high-end porn magazine. But as with Tushy, it looks like every scene is shot in the same location. Would it really be that much trouble to walk out of the balcony of the bedroom?
I would recommend it at least for a one month join, especially for interracial fans, but nothing more than a month. They update twice per week, which isn't bad by most standards. Still, I would like to see them combine Tushy, Blacked and Vixen. As it is there's just not a lot of value for the price. If they combined the three then I would be much more positive. As it is, watch a preview or two before joining.
I haven't had that problem with the Tushy videos, but I no longer use VLC. I was a loyal VLC user for years. I had some videos from Brazzers that were coming off as corrupted on VLC. I went back and found the old, "Classic Media Player" with all the codecs and haven't had a single problem out of it with any videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A high-production values site that specializes in anal.
- If you're looking for high-quality, this is the site for you. Of the 140 scenes available, around 60 are available in 4k, they also offer 1080p on all scenes and have smaller resolutions as well.
- Every scene has a downloadable photo set, pictures are 3000 long end.
- Updates every 5-6 days.
- Top-tier models, almost look like women who shouldn't be in porn.
- Above-average download speeds and no limits that I know of.
Cons:
- This one is the really only true con, but I'll split it. First, the content is repetitive.
- The scenery, setting rarely changes.
- If you watch a few scenes in a row, you're going to realize you're watching a staged porn scene.
Bottom Line:
I had heard a lot about Tushy/Blacked/Vixen, but hadn't been a member of any of them. It's obvious this isn't a site or studio that's trying to churn out quantity over quality. The scenes on here are fairly straightforward. There's a little talking, usually from the female model, leading into the scene, but it almost always revolves around sex or fantasies.
You can't complain about the technical quality or even the sex. The sex is believable, all involved seem to enjoy themselves. The scenes are typically longer than many sites, most I've watched are over 40 minutes.
I now have a 4k television/monitor (got it more for PS4 Pro). The 4k scenes are crystal clear, but I still just download the 720p ones to keep. Which is a strength at Tushy, I'll download and keep all of these scenes. Production values have always played a part in my interest in porn and they do those well.
Which is also a bit of a negative, but not worth a con, there's not a lot of content here. What it's going to amount to is if 140 scenes is more than you would usually download and keep from a site with 10,000 scenes. If so, this site is a very good deal.
I would like to see more variety in the location(s). I've had this problem before with sites like FuckedHard18 and X-Art. The site itself kind of reminds me of X-Art.
Navigation is clear and easy. The numbers as of 5/29/2017:
106 models
139 scenes (videos and pictures)
And all scenes include anal. I'm back and forth on anal, but most of these models look like they enjoy it and nothing comes across as forced. Which might be the biggest selling point here. These models look like models, seeing them do anal and enjoying it has to be a fetish of some sorts. I do think they could stand to add a few more models with bigger butts, not Reality Kings-type, but curvier models.
Still this is high-quality porn, no matter what my negative points are, it has enough story to keep you interested if you into the story and there's seduction with having the models talk about their fantasies and thoughts out loud. My only concern would be how long it can last without changing some of the scenes? The update pace is good enough, but after downloading these current 140 scenes, there will only be 70 or so new scenes over the next year. I think if they're going to charge that premium price they need to combine this site with Blacked and Vixen.
Would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member, especially those who want 4k.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Not only one of the first sites/networks I ever joined, but was at one time, my favorite.
- Enough content to keep anyone busy, easily one of the largest sites on the internet.
- The models. Especially if you like glam models.
- Once easy to use navigation is now more complicated by the "network" concept, but it's still usable and works well once you figure it out.
- Download speeds are average.
Cons:
- Joining and canceling is typical MindGeek nonsense. They moved pre-checked sales lower down the screen and replaced them with what you're paying today, so it takes a scroll to see the pre-checked ones. Canceling doesn't send a receipt email.
- Those "average" download speeds have dropped as low as 50% below my average at times, but have also been as high as 50% higher than my average at other times.
- The site/network no longer has any character or uniqueness to it, something it used to be known for.
- Costs extra to download
Bottom Line:
There was a time when I would join Twistys for one year and be completely satisfied with it. I joined this time on 4/29/2017 and can say, I haven't been on the site since 5/10.
The content isn't really the problem. Very pretty models. It's just that it's no different than what you're going to find anywhere else or for that matter, on a DVD site. It's easy to blame the dropoff of Twistys on MindGeek now owning it, but that's not the only problem.
The quality, if you pay extra for downloads, is very good. There's HD videos dating back 7-8 years, photos are zipped, technically it's as good as it always was.
The insistence of making it a network is silly. I know that the old owner Shap tried the network concept, but never pushed it the way it's being pushed now. The old style was as simple as clicking on a "site" which the name told the genre of. Now, the scenes are dropped into a hub and you have to trust their judgement of what is Hard, Lesbian, Solo, hopefully the love of networks will try to navigate its way out of that mess and get lost.
I still think it's a good site, especially for new or newer members. The older content, 2007-2011, is very good, maybe not the highest technical quality, but there was more oomph to the content. If you like interviews, the old interviews on here are some of the best. If you like solo, the older solo videos are as good as anyone's. It's that newer content that's a problem.
Guy walks in, girl gets naked, sex, scene over. If I can find any positives about the newer content it is in some of the solo scenes. The hardcore scenes feel like Brazzers Light. I really don't think the newer good solo scenes are that much better, I think it all depends on the models.
Also, if you're a past fan of Twisty's pictures, they're still good. Somehow, they didn't mess with the lighting/coolness Twisty's pictures are known for and that includes newer picture sets as well.
If you're new to Twistys or just going back to get some old favorites, you'll like it well enough, but if you're a longtime member and have a hard drive stash of the old content, I don't recommend it, not even for a month.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Reality Kings network and the biggest reason I return.
- A fairly popular niche these days and Reality Kings seem to put more production values in these scenes than any of their others.
- Good download speeds, about 80% of my max.
- Updates twice per month, could be more frequent, but it's not bad.
- 1080p option on all 122 scenes.
- Taking us back to these days of requiring some imagination.
Cons:
- As with the niche sites on networks, it will probably end sooner than later.
- If you're in it for the acting ability, you're going to be disappointed.
- Scenarios want to become boring
Bottom Line:
This is a fairly simple site on Reality Kings. There's not a whole lot of difference from scene to scene, but it's some of best porn being shot these days.
The premise is stepmom/aunt/stepsister catches younger sister/stepdaughter having sex with a man and joins in. These scenes are not believable. There's one where the stepmom is using the toilet while the stepdaughter is having sex in the shower, in the same room. But if you use your imagination some and enjoy voyeurism, there are some very good scenes.
A lot of what I like are the scenes where the stepmother doesn't just "stumble" up and catch them having sex. It's more like she's watching them before joining in. That's enjoyable to me. I like seeing the older models masturbating while watching. On top of that, the models on this site are almost always top-tier models.
While the two updates per month could be higher, it's better than none and each scene has pictures and videos. I once talked about the value of porn being to me, how many scenes do I keep from a site. As of today, 5/16/2017, I have every scene from this site stored on my hard drive and don't intend to delete any of them. I know that each of the other big American networks also have sites similar to this one, but Reality Kings, is adding more with their range of models.
Also helps to keep a sense of humor when watching these. You're going to see some flashbacks to 90s porn when models made over-expressive faces to help build the story, even though the over-expressiveness is what started hurting porn in the 90s. Kind of strange even. Seems like it was Reality Kings and a few others that first brought "reality porn" into the mainstream to be more believable, but now they're returning to the very style of porn they pushed out.
I would join just this site which adds a lot of value when you add the network in with. Would recommend it to anyone who likes MILF porn, voyeurism or misses 90s porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Look Ben, you're 66 and I'm 42. This is turning into a foolish, childish argument. Let it go. Write a review for Perfect Gonzo and use any words you think fit. I'm actually being encouraging to you here. I honestly thought you were a younger person just looking to argue. You should know better than to argue about opinions ... I do and won't anymore.
You're missing the concept at this point.
First, yes, I had an ax to grind with the webmaster. It's called me paying for a month membership and him allowing me to be locked out for 2 weeks without doing anything to fix the situation. Tell you what, go pay your power or gas bill, then let them cut your power or gas off for two weeks and see if you suddenly have an ax to grind.
Second, everything I posted was true. If it wasn't, the webmaster would be here denying it.
Third, you've been a member here for 4.5 years and have posted 0 reviews. You find it easy to criticize my review style, but you've not found it easy to write a review yourself? As for my review style, I choose to post facts, not personal opinions, I will sometimes add personal opinions, but the facts are my priority. You use words like, "raunchy" and "sensual". Those are very subjective words. What I see as raunchy, you see as sensual and what I see as sensual, you see as raunchy. Meaning, if I used those words in my reviews, it could mislead you. Instead, I give you the facts, you can then go look at the content yourself and decide if the combination of facts and whatever content it is, is the type of site you would like to join.
Hey this is a review site. It's my review. I write what I want. Don't read it. If I need to take every character in the character limit, I will. When you buy Porn Users and start marking decisions around here, then you can limit me to whatever character limit you would prefer, but until then ... don't read it. Don't push reply. You made it longer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very large network of some classic sites and some good newer sites.
- Give Me Pink is the top site for me and it looks like they've added it back now 4/22/2017.
- Excellent technical quality throughout the network including a relatively high number of 4k scenes, no use to me, but it's worth mentioning.
- Navigation is okay. If you mess with the tags enough you'll find that the navigation is good, but if you're impatient with the tags, you'll think it's pretty bad.
- Very good photo sets, would compare their quality to In the Crack and once questioned if Give Me Pink and In the Crack were the same company.
- Download speed is good, I'm now able to max download on porn sites at 10MB/s, I'm able to get around 8MB/s on Perfect Gonzo. Most porn sites give me 5-6 MB/s.
- Good update schedule, 10 updates so far in April, two are interviews and there were 13 updates in March, so nearly every other day.
- Huge price savings over what these sites used to cost.
Cons:
- Well, to start with, I spent the first 12 days of my membership locked out of my account. It's not a glitch or fluke. They even have a link on their login page that says, "Can't login? Forgot your password? Blocked account? Try our unblocking tool here!" Will further this in BL.
- Sites disappear then reappear. Both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush were included in the network when I signed up, then after the 12 days of being locked out, they were both gone. Now, 5 days later, they are back.
- Seems they struggle with real, legit criticism as seen by someone posting a comment to mock mine. A person who admits they were given a free membership. Mr. Perfect Gonzo webmaster, you own or run a site in an industry that has zero integrity, don't give people a reason to question yours.
- Interviews. I'm tired of disputing these with webmasters. I joined a porn site not a get to know me site.
Bottom Line:
This network intrigued as much as any network I've ever seen. One exception might be the Kink Network, but even so, Perfect Gonzo has multiple sites in it that I used to pay $29.99 a month for each one. I also had been under the impression that sites like Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic were lost in the Euro porn meltdown of 2009-2011. But now all of a sudden, those sites are going strong as is the whole network.
The technical quality here should be a big draw for those who like the big resolutions. They have 4k videos dating back to October 2014. Maybe more impressive, they have 1080p dating back to 2006. These videos also have smaller resolutions for download as well. Their picture sets are downloadable and the newer ones are 5000 long end. This part of the site is very impressive to say the least.
The navigation is good, at least to me, it's a clean network hub page that has a few easy to miss helpful parts. There's a drop-down box that allows you to filter the updates to a specific site within the network. There's tags that include the separate sites, actions, to filter the updates to your taste or interest. They even have a bonus section that has content from Blacked, Cum Louder, Teen Dreams, Sapphic Erotica, though I did watch a few of the scenes and wonder if they're just cut portions of the scenes. Still, everything is looking really good.
They use Epoch as a biller which is always a plus. The models are top-tier. You'll mostly see a bunch of Euro models, especially if you go into the older content as these sites used to be almost exclusively Euro. I'll even say a thank you to them for putting a picture zip download link in with the download links for the videos. It's a small thing, but most of us get frustrated with having to back out of video downloads, click on photos, click on download photos.
There's a good blend of genres on the network. There's solo girls, lesbian scenes, creampie, gangbang, pretty much everything you can think of outside of gay or transsexual.
At this point, I honestly believe the network is a 90+
But ... I'm now halfway through my membership and have had access to the network for only 3 days, have seen Give Me Pink content just for 2 days. Looking at my email account, I have 9 emails between Perfect Gonzo and Epoch about the login problems. Not a single one of the Perfect Gonzo ones are from an employee, a webmaster, but instead are automated emails that insist my password hadn't changed, even though it wouldn't work. On top of that, there's the link on the login page that says if your account was locked, to click the link and it will refresh your account. I did it 3 different times, loading time for the page was 3-5 minutes. It would then tell me a new password had been sent to my email. I would go check ... no email with a new password. I would check Spam/Junk ... no email. Then when I did have access, right after signing up, the Give Me Pink and Fist Flush content disappeared. As of today, 4/23/2017, both of those sites are back on this network with all their content.
I can accept glitches and any kind of technical problems, but did I really need to have 9 emails, 3 attempted password refreshes and 13 days of no access just to get the access I had paid for? I'll again point out the comment left here on PU to offset and mock mine. I'm knocking 10 points off the review for that.
This network is plenty good enough to let its content do its talking for it. One of the best I've seen when it's not removing sites or blocking access. But worse than that is when a paying member is mocked by a member who received free access. As Khan used to say, "A shill is still a shill no matter what color you paint it."
Overall content numbers:
Roughly 2,050 full scenes, each includes video and picture set as of 4/23/2017.
10 different websites within the network. Several of which I've paid $29.99/month to be a member of in the past.
I would normally say this content is exclusive, but can no longer say that since Give Me Pink and Fist Flush also come with a Sapphic Erotica membership.
If they can get over the technical problems with the site and keep those 10 sites in their network, I wouldn't be surprised if this ended up being one of the top 10 sites in the porn world. It's that good, but they need to stop me from saying "but" before I rate it that high. Paying $30 for a site in this day and age is a bit high, but I could still see it being worth that. As it is though, I'm going to end up receiving about 16 days of membership for $30.
You can do the math. I subtracted 10 points for the overall frustration between the site, lack of responses, the shill comment to offset my real, paying member legitimate complaint and see how high this network could score if all that gets fixed.
Thanks for the play on my negative comment about the site. You know they say imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.
Since you've been able to contact their webmaster and receive free memberships, which obviously have no bearing on your overly-positive comment, let him know these things:
He should fix his login page since it still lists Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as their sites.
He should spend more time taking care of paying customers than giving memberships to people who go kiss his ass on sites like this one.
Tell him his customer service was so non-existent that Epoch themselves did the refresh of my subscription so I could access the site again. Then apologized for him not fixing the issue.
I honestly had backed away and edited my comment about the site, but you've just bought David a full review of the bullshit he's selling. It will be fair, might not be that bad of a score, but all the deception will be pointed out. So, tell David to be watching for it. I have timestamped screenshots of everything so tell him not to try and go fix everything.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network almost exclusively dedicated to handjobs.
- There's probably more handjob content on this network than any other site or network, I'll get to that and the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good.
- Eight sites are included in the network, but probably should just be combined into one site.
- Had some problems with this network when I tried joining their "full access" trial, so I came back as a full member and the problems are at least fixed.
Cons:
- Underwhelming. I think that word sums up the network as a whole. A lot of the models have no business being called models. The navigation is very bad. It requires a login for each of the 8 sites, despite having a network hub page. The video quality ranges from average to terrible.
- Just a note on this, back several months ago, I joined this network on a trial subscription. It originally worked as a "full trial", but after downloading 12-15 videos, it started booting me off the site. As mentioned in the pros, I didn't have these problems once I joined as a full member, but anyone considering the trial should be aware.
- Well, eventually you find a good scene, if you figure out how to find the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You might find this hard to believe, but I'm having trouble counting the number of scenes on the network simply because there's no way for me to find them. I kid you not, if you go to the homepage, this is what you're going to find:
Three mentions of new sites added to the network.
Latest prize giveaway
Two newest "Bonus Sites" which are also listed above in the "new sites" links.
A top 10 Most Popular Scenes list
A top 10 Top Rated Scenes list
The 5 latest updates
If you go to say the Club Tug site and login you are presented with the same page from above except it now has the top 10s from just Club Tug and last 5 updates from Club Tug. Eventually, you'll click on "updates" and find a scroll-a-thon through the scenes on the site. There's no filter, no way to search, but there is at least a model tab to find models you like.
I don't know whether this is sad or even real, but you receive a pop-up letter from the webmaster explaining how they offer the best customer service and feel free to email him.
Here's some numbers I have found:
Roughly 600 videos across the network. The newer videos are 1280x720, but a lot drop into the 480p range. There's no real way to know how new any of these scenes are. There's a date, but no year. Looks like they update 10 times a month, which is a respectable number.
I was pretty rough on their models in the cons, but it's true. I understand the concept of beauty if in the eye of the beholder, but there's some terribly bad looking women on this site.
Which is where I will shift gears a little. There's some well-known models here as well. There's quite a few pretty models. And as said, the newer videos are 720p quality. The newer sites, TeasePOV, Mean Massage, and Petite 18 are all good overall. Tug Job itself has plenty of good scenes on it. So, it's not all negative.
I think they could move all of the "sites" onto one site, put a decent basic search engine on it and they'd have an above-average site. As it is, you better have a good mouse with a good scroll wheel and some patience. There's good content here you won't find anywhere else or at least I've not seen before.
Quite a few of the scenes go into plots similar to CFNM sites. The Mean Massage site goes into femdom and cum-controlling. Some of it covers fairly rare content, but you'll have to find it. For me, one month was more than enough. I wouldn't pay the full price for this network. There's just too many headaches and cussing my monitor for full price. Maybe they'll get it cleaned up some with a new interface? Until then, I can't recommend it except for those who love handjobs.
I didn't even realize this network existed until last week. I ended up having to contact Epoch. The network itself kept saying it had refreshed my login, but it never worked. Epoch contacted me back and said they had it refreshed. Sure enough, it worked. I do think Sapphic bought Give Me Pink and Fistflush, I didn't realize I had spam email from Sapphic about adding both of those sites to their monthly membership to Sapphic Erotica.
I'm not editing the title, but am the comment.
I tried for 3 straight nights to login, clicked their refresh password link (received no email with a new password) and finally just sent an email to the biller Epoch.
Epoch had the account refreshed in less than 3 hours and I'm back to having access. I received zero help from the network itself or their support tickets. So, overall it was still a bad experience with the site itself.
I really couldn't answer this one except with "other". I had mentioned in a forum thread, Zara White(s), as being a believable actress. There's a DVD called, "Curse of the Catwoman" where she's completely believable. Thing is, I don't know if that's good acting or if she was just really horny lol.
My apology on the part about having no way to remove the interviews. I'll be sure to use that feature from now on.
Truthfully, I used to really like interview videos, but as I mentioned, ALS sites, a few of the ATK sites too, they were good. I think I just got burnt out on them similar to how I'm not getting much out of girl/girl content these days even though it used to be my favorite genre.
I'm going to add a couple points for the filter option.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long running site that offers good (mostly) amateur masturbation pictures and videos.
- Good TBP/PU discounted price, especially if you haven't been a member for awhile or even ever.
- Navigation is good, but can be a bit wonky at times, my main problem is the picture near the top of the main page, it scrolls when I try to scroll the website.
- Good technical quality, newer videos have 1080p option and photo sets are downloadable in zips, the XL photo sets are 3000 long end.
- Well above-average DL speeds, about 80-85% of my max download speed (on porn sites).
- Updates daily, most days have multiple updates.
- Maybe the strongest pro is the models, for the most part, seem to be real amateurs who bring themselves to orgasm.
- This could be a con for some, there's also some "bonus" content from ATK Exotics, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Hairy and Wet and Puffy.
- One of personal preference, most of the models dress in normal, everyday clothes to start the sets.
Cons:
- Watch me not win over any fans with this one. I really don't like ATK Hairy. I understand there are men and women who like seeing hairy women, but the underarm hair is just too much. One can look over at some of my old ATK reviews where I also complained about the Hairy content.
- Nitpicking here much like Raging Buddhist's recent comment, I don't like the interview videos. Seriously, why would I care what an adult model says about the adult video industry?
- One that all sites using amateur models runs into, a lot of the models are shy. That's a con for me, but could be a pro for others.
Bottom Line:
I last joined Yanks way back in 2011. I did enjoy the content back then, but I thought the site lacked a certain personality I like a site to have. I compared Yanks to I Feel Myself back then and still think they're similar. The "personality" I look for is the opposite of shy. The transition from dressed to fully nude is still lacking in the majority of the videos. Most I have watched start nude and end ... well, nude. That's just a personal preference and lets have some understanding here, I've reviewed and been a member of over 200 sites. At this point, there are just things that annoy me. I'll even explain the clothed to nude preference. It lets me see what the model would look like if I saw her in person at the store.
One place this site scores high with me is its picture sets. Which continues my clothed to nude preference. The vast majority of their photo sets do start clothed and end nude with flash/teasing in-between. I enjoy these photo sets as much as the videos.
I put a con on the Hairy sets. It looks like Yanks also has their own Hairy models. Believe it or not, burn me at the stake for it, but those turn my stomach. I've told it before, I shave my head, I hate most body hair and have been this way for most of my life. But, a little neatly trimmed bush is fine, see my all-time favorite model Eve Angel. We're not talking about bush though. We're talking hairier armpits than mine. And those models are right there in the updates with no way for me to remove them from my view.
Most of that complaining isn't that bad. I like Yanks and am glad I returned. They have a lot of models I really like. Was glad to see a little heavier model like Jennavive Marie. There's some older models too. And all in all, the masturbation and orgasms are about as real as you're going to see in internet porn.
Navigation is good. They even have the bonus content from the other sites in drop-down boxes so you can easily switch from Yanks content to whichever bonus site you like. There's another side too. Straight male masturbation site called Club Stroke. Which I think is an underused concept on porn sites these days. My wife likes porn too so she can check those out. I've always wondered why more sites don't try this gender mix format. Download speeds are very good across the sites.
There's a lot of content, by my count:
2,120 videos
1,353 photo sets
Those are just the Yanks only numbers and don't include the bonus content from the other sites.
Here's the problem and it's what Raging Buddhist commented on, those video numbers include interviews, playing around videos and what I would consider non-porn videos. Which is why the navigation is considered just good. There's no way to remove the videos you're not interested in. A quick fix? Put a masturbation tag on all of the masturbation videos and add a new option in the videos drop-down box that is just masturbation to filter those out or in, depending on your perspective.
Still, the content is good and the photo sets are very good. Sometimes photos can convey teasing better than video since it captures the model before she stops teasing.
The overall technical quality is very good for a site with this type of content. As far back as I've looked, 2011 or so, has at least a 720p option on the videos. And if I were to complain anymore it would just be to say they seem to be worried more about their overall video numbers than they need to be. This is a fairly underpopulated niche in 2017 porn world. No offense is meant to the models who tell their stories or talk about the politics of the porn industry, but to put it mildly, it's just not interesting. Some of the greatest solo girl websites have used interviews and behind the scenes with some effectiveness, the ALS sites come to mind and Twistys old content when Shap was still around. It's not a big negative to me. It's just once I get caught up on the content I've missed since 2011, it will probably be awhile before I come back. Though, I don't think I'll wait 6 years again.
I'm giving the site a boost from my 2011 score since this type of content isn't easy to come by. And I'll continue to stress how important the pictures are to my score. It's a very good site to me or at least to anyone like me who hasn't been here in awhile. There's even some girl-girl content in there too, but I've mostly burnt out on girl-girl. I believe if they incorporated some type of tagging system to separate the non-porn videos from the masturbation videos, I'd add a few more points to the score. The biggest point reduction right now is there are a percentage, 20% or less, of models I don't like at all. I could see this site scoring a 90 or higher if a few things were fixed. I would recommend it for a monthly join. Especially if you like photos. I've looked over dozens of the photo sets and liked everyone of them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very niche site from a top network. If you like seeing pretty women give a variety of blowjobs, messy, deepthroat, facials, partially clothed, all-nude, then you'll probably enjoy this site a lot.
- Includes access to the stellar DDF Network, but did used to be a successful, standalone site.
- Updates a little more than weekly, at least at the current time, averaging 5 updates per month.
- Each update comes with a video and photo set.
- Video can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and photos are zipped for downloading.
- Download speeds are above average (for porn sites), I'm downloading at 80% of my max speed.
- I've heard that women can watch these videos and improve their own oral-giving capability.
- Navigation is good, mostly straightforward for the site and network overall, but will say I always have trouble finding the pictures. It's because you just scroll down from the video.
- Network as a whole is an excellent value.
Cons:
- This might be the goofiest con I've ever listed -- I keep waiting for more than the blowjob to happen.
- Could say this on nearly all sites, could use more variety in model-type.
- Probably the closest I'll come to a real con, this type of content can become very boring and repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Only Blowjob is one of the few DDF sites I hadn't been a member of before the DDF Network. It's not so much that I dislike blowjobs, as it is, that I usually want to see more than just the blowjob. As a matter of fact, when I'm watching most porn videos, I skip the blowjob part.
I made a claim in the pros of this site can help women (or men) with their oral skills. I can tell you that. I'll leave it alone at that, but try having your significant other to watch a few and you'll see the difference.
Which is what at least helps this site stand out. You get the feeling the female models are very much into giving blowjobs. Might not sound like much, but you do see it. From techniques they use to moans from being turned on themselves. Another part I like about the site is most of the videos at least start with some teasing. There's a sensuality to the scenes that most porn rarely shows these days.
The amount of content also helps OnlyBlowjob. Almost goes into hard to believe numbers.
As of 4/3/2017: 1,647 full videos
The videos have been at minimum 720p since 2011 and all current scenes are 1080p with some being 4k and others being virtual reality. There doesn't seem to be any logical flow of when they release 4k or VR.
And to my surprise, the zipped high quality format on the pictures are 4000 long end.
I do think the niche limits the appeal of this site. I've always been drawn away from this site by the other DDF sites on the network, but was glad I checked it out this time. And it's not as formulaic as I remembered it being. There's scenes with two guys and one girl. There's scenes that bring footjobs in and there's scenes that take advantage of the bustier models large boobs.
The navigation is easy to use, but sometimes the actions listed can be wrong. Each scene has a list of actions in the video, like: Titty-fucking, cum on tits, cum in mouth, facial, masturbation, and so on. Some of those are marked on some videos, but when you watch them you won't see the action, but that's a minor complaint, not even really worth of a con.
I don't know if DDF still does this or not, but used to, some of these Only Blowjob scenes were just the blowjob section cut out of a hardcore scene. You could then look on the other DDF sites and find the whole scene. While that seemed like a rip-off, it actually changes since these Only Blowjob videos are usually right around 20 minutes long. So there's teasing you wouldn't see in the hardcore full-sex version of the scene.
That's the strength of the site. While, like me, you might think just a blowjob scene isn't really enough, you'll see that there's more to these scenes than just a blowjob. The network also comes into play since you have access to much different niches that break the monotony. It's a good site overall and one that helps the DDF Network be one of the top networks available.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
My mom found several very old Hustler magazines in my room. She asked where I got them. I blamed my uncle. She called him, cussed him out, told him what a worthless piece of an uncle he was. Next time I saw him, he said, "What did you do? Your mom called me cussing me out. I figured you blamed something on me. Porn or alcohol?"
Everybody that had that uncle ... misses that uncle.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A Kink site, Divine Bitches is probably one of the more far-reaching sites for straight men.
- If you're looking for something different in today's copy and paste world of porn, you're going to find that something different here.
- Should be very high on anyone's list who likes seeing women in power sexually.
- Scenes are relatively long (50-70 minutes) and come in multiple formats for downloading, up to 720p.
- Navigation on just Divine Bitches is simple, but can get tiresome since it's a scroll through scenes site. Navigation across the network is very good though they've joined in the "channels" tab instead of "sites". That's a minor annoyance probably for just me.
- Download speeds are very good, I'm downloading at 90% of my max DL speed and it's consistent.
- Divine Bitches updates twice a month, which is at least acceptable.
- Comes with the Kink network which means you've got access to 29 other Kink-related sites.
- Excellent customer service (touch on in BL)
Cons:
- If you have trouble seeing a woman completely dominating a man then you're not going to like this site at all.
- Pictures are still missing. They are supposed to be returning, but it's a con until they do.
- This most likely is the perfect example of a "niche" site. Which means more people will dislike it before they even try it, thanks to stereotypes.
- I'll put it here with a note that I don't consider this a con, but some will. Highest video resolution is 720p. (Will further in BL)
Bottom Line:
Divine Bitches is a site I once received as a bonus site from Kink. My only interest in it at that time was the scenes with Isis Love in them. Even the scenes with Isis in them weren't as easy to watch as I expected. I should say I think Isis is the best of the models on this site.
What you have here is a big middle-finger to mainstream porn. You won't find a male performer squishing his foot on the face of the female. You won't have four 200 pound men having a gangbang with a 100 pound female. There's anal, but it's not what you're expecting by mainstream's standards. This is what really matters though. The males in these scenes seem to really enjoy the "abuse". Some most likely are gay or bisexual, but there's quite a few of them who have scenes with them dominating females on other sites. I don't mess around too much, in real-life, with dom/sub roleplay, but the models here, both male and female seem to really be into it.
Which is a big selling point of this site. You see genuine enjoyment, satisfaction from both the females and males. It even shows in their post-video interviews talking about the scene.
What you are going to see that you might not like or you might like a lot, is women using strap-ons on men. It's not in every scene, but it is common enough to mention it since some might be offended by it. I try to look at sex as a pure form of lust that is pushed by allowing yourself to do something you wouldn't ever think you would do. Because of this belief, it makes this site even more interesting and believable.
Wanted to mention something here. I've been a member of the Kink Network since they started it back several months ago. They don't use a regular biller like CCBill or Epoch, but do use an in-house biller. They're very easy to contact, respond quickly and should be looked at as an exception to the rule of not joining sites without a reputable biller. I've been a member here 12 different times and have nothing but good experiences with their customer service.
One of my cons is based around the picture sets. For years, Kink had picture sets with each scene, these were especially important to sites like Public Disgrace, where I wanted to see the expressions of the people watching. They're bringing them back, but I don't know when. The other con is they don't offer 1080p on their videos. But thanks to the length of most of their scenes, I'm not for sure if a person would really want to download a 1080p scene that last 70 minutes. The 720p scenes alone can be over 2-3 GB each. Luckily, their videos are crystal clear and I prefer 720p anyway.
This site shouldn't push anyone away. I originally thought it would me, but you see something here that you don't see as much in regular porn. You see the women coming off as powerful, dominant, like their bodies and sexual abilities are so great the man can't stop her. Where as when you see a dominant male, it's usually based around his physical traits being more powerful than the woman's. It shows a different side to sex, the mental side, which is very rare in porn. I can't say I enjoy the idea of seeing a woman stick a dildo up a hairy man butt, but Kink does a good job of focusing more on the woman's body as she's doing it.
If we all really thought about it, we would realize how many times we've complained about too many camera views of the man's butt when he's doing the female model in doggy. Well, on this site, that view is more of the female's butt. I used to join two Kink sites per year. I always considered them my "brain reset" sites that reset my brain from all the mainstream porn I watched. I have a year membership now that they're a network and really don't know if I'll ever cancel it. There's always something at least intriguing.
Still, I'm a realist and know some of the content on Divine Bitches, isn't for everyone. I do think if you have an open-mind and consider that it's still a naked woman and naked man, just like mainstream porn, you'll see that this site is very good. It's kind of like just changing the camera angle. And on top of it all, the female models on this site are almost all very attractive and sexy, even in feminine ways. Also, depending on how familiar you are with Kink, they are very diverse in their models. You'll find models of most races, most body-types from skinny to BBW and all the scenes are exclusive to Kink's network.
As of 2/20/2017 there are 387 scenes on Divine Bitches, top models (my favorites on here), include Ashley Fires, Isis Love, Lea Lexis, Daisy Ducati and Dragon Lily.
I consider this site one of my top 5 sites on the network and would recommend the network to anyone. There's enough "not so rough" and "not too far-reaching" porn here for the average porn fan, but especially recommend it for those who like to see some evolution in the porn world. Also consider the year membership to be the best value in porn.
I accidentally joined Vivid a year ago, not checking PU first, it was streaming only. I canceled it and never went back to it.
Bad thing is, I don't download near as much as I used to. I'm usually lucky to download 50-100 GB from a site these days, but removing that download option just doesn't work for me. Maybe if they only charged whatever their price is for one month/12 months.
We pay roughly $10 a month for Netflix and $10 a month for Amazon Prime, but I watch those on average, an hour a day. I only watch porn for an average of about 10 minutes a day (not an everyday thing anymore). So a streaming-only porn site might could convince me to join for $30-$36 a year. Now I'm curious if any of the streaming sites offer yearly cheap memberships like that?
I think heartcore's definition probably varies from person to person, but this is what I consider heartcore:
Artsy, lots of foreplay, non-penetration acts (especially kissing) that eventually leads into what is supposed to be passionate intercourse.
My biggest problem with heartcore porn is one I talked about in one of my reviews, maybe Sex-Art. They've got me convinced that male talent #1 is really in love with female talent #1. Then I watch a video of female talent #2 and she's with male talent #1. Then I watch 30 more different female talents and 25 of them are with male talent #1. I've always been known for complicating things when it comes to porn, but I'm fairly forgiving when it comes to fantasy aspects. For example, most Kink content has convinced me the women prefer harder sex. The step-sibling niche is another that I can at least see in fantasy, but the heartcore sites are trying to convince me or my fantasies that this one male talent really loves 25 women and they all love him too. Maybe that's it, I can accept almost any fantasy except for ones revolving around a real emotion like love.
The few sites that are sticking to their strength (FTV, ALS Scan, Met-Art, Kink) are still very good, but beyond those, it's like every site (Twistys and 21 Sextury are the best examples) has merged into a network and we have our choice of anal, older men/women with younger men/women, step-brother/sister/mother/father, if the music industry followed the porn industry, 95% of bands would sound like whatever is at the top of the sales chart. I don't see any way for internet porn to return to its 2005-self.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
