Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some more taboo stepfamily porn.
- 147 scenes, videos, photos and screencaps.
- CCbill
- 121 models, some scenes have multiple models in them.
- Ran by the Nubiles group, but is not part of their network.
- High quality on everything.
Cons:
- Scenes are not as likable as similar niche/stepfamily sites.
- Some scenes are under 30 minutes. In this niche, as unbelievable as it usually is, the build up and story mean everything
- Indistinguishable niche/poor acting.
Bottom Line:
I'll admit a mistake on my part. I thought this was a Team Skeet standalone site. I realized when I saw my bank statement said XFC that's it's a Nubiles owned standalone site. I like Nubiles but it kind of lowered my expectations on them pulling off what is supposed to be a taboo niche.
I went big word in my cons. Indistinguishable niche, some of these scenes do nothing to make you even think these are stepsiblings. It's not that I want it to be completely believable, it's just it's like plain old hardcore, gonzo scenes.
My score isn't bad on it. I know that some might not mind that problem/con.
The models are cute and at times way too serious to fit this niche. It's like stepfamily falling in love porn. I'm being too hard on it. It's good, especially if you like the models. I will say the scenes with more than two people in them are very good. It breaks up that feeling of mushy/heartcore and those are also the more entertaining. It will be a stepsister that bets her best friend something with the loser having to have sex with the stepsister's stepbrother. It's at least something.
I didn't have any step-siblings so I don't know if step-siblings just jump up and start having sex or if they kind of fall into because of some game they were playing ... which is what I prefer to believe.
The video quality goes up to 1080p and goes down to 270p, I'm still downloading the 720p myself and they look very good. Photos are a strength here as the Nubiles group used to be more focused on photos than videos. You can tell, very high quality, professional studio style photos.
I'm just starting to think this niche is getting stale. They're probably going to need to watch some Japanese stepfamily porn to improve the niche. Either that or do like Team Skeet does and go just silly and completely unbelievable with it (Family Strokes).
The site at least has a good update schedule but I would take 1/2 the scenes if they put more work into each of the scenes. I don't even know that it's that this niche is that popular or if it's that porn finally found a story or angle that gets into the taboo section of our brains. It's worth a join, especially if you like the models but there are better stepfamily sites out there.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good MILF site that has a lot of sites.
- Very good video quality with everything on the site having up to 1080p.
- Photos and screencaps, both are downloadable.
- No limits on downloads that I've found.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max).
- Some interesting niches that porn could use more of including JOI (jerk off instruction).
- Nearly averages an update per day, seems to be 6 updates in 7 days.
- Scenes are generally fun-orientated, I would even use the word silly.
Cons:
- Way too many ads and upsells.
- Layout makes it near impossible to count scenes since they mix in the scenes you don't have access to without upgrading.
- I'm not for sure how many more times I'm going to be able to believe the 38 year old model is surprised to see a hard dick.
Bottom Line:
I had been meaning to join this site for the JOI scenes and the MylfBody (working out, exercise clothes) scenes.
Their JOI scenes are worth joining for if you're into JOI. Besides the talking and teasing, they will use a dildo to mimic jerking you off then put it in their mouth or pussy. This is a niche that I think is very undervalued in porn. They go a step further than most JOI sites with their models going all the way to nude.
The MilfBody site is also very good for those that are into fit women, women working out and women wearing workout clothes.
Here's the problem: These sites are not very big. Here's a list of the sites you get with Mylf with the number of scenes in parenthesis.
MylfBlows (21)
MilfBody (36)
Milfty (73)
Mom Drips (38)
FullofJOI (35)
Mylfed (37)
GotMylf (53)
Lone MILF (31)
MylfBoss (16)
They also have a MylfX series with each one have a subtitle.
MylfX TeamSkeet HD (20)
MylfX Fucking Awesome HD (18)
MylfX Lady Fyre (21)
MylfX SpankMonster (1)
When you combine them all it's a decent sized collection. I just get the feeling this could have been done in a much simpler way than having 13 different sites. In some ways, the multiple site format is good. I wanted all the FullofJOI scenes and all of the MilfBody scenes so it made those easy to get to but you will see scenes on the other sites that would have fit on MilfBody and anyway, how many ways can you spell Mylf or make a pun with it? As silly as these guys can be it kind of makes me feel like they're just sitting around trying to see who can come up with the funniest name for a Milf site.
I would have went with Let's Get Mylfical for the fitness one.
Enough joking for now. The models are very good looking, there are implants and some tattoos. I don't know many of these models. They are pros I'm sure. I do know Chanel Preston and her MilfBody scene was one of the ones that made me want to join.
There's a point I made about MILFs in the past and that is they're usually beyond the shyness stage and I think they generally perform better than the younger models. My favorite age group of models is 25-35, I would think most of these women fit into that group.
Good sized collection, very good video quality, good update schedule, downloadable photos, it has just about everything you could ask for.
What happened with me is I had a review of the network from 2015 and only gave it a 75. Which is a very low score from me seeing that my average score is 86. When I came back to the network a few weeks ago, they had added Mean Massage, Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the one you have to go to on your own since they have no links for it, Shady Spa. These sites do seem to be updating and have 1080p videos.
So, I went by if I gave it a 75 for the whole network in 2015 and they've added 5 sites that are at least a little more creative with 1080p and regular updates, I should give them about 2.5 points per new sites for the effort to at least trying to improve. One thing to add here, while Tease POV is an interesting site, it features the model sucking, handjob, talking dirty, the downloads are terribly slow compared to the rest of the network. I would go as far as saying 90% slower than the rest of the network.
We've been here a long time, RB, and while you did just give the 50 to one of the sites in the network and not the network as a whole, don't you think 50 is a bit extreme? I don't care either way. I just reviewed the network an 88, it has more handjob content than any other site or network in the genre. It has mostly amateur models. While it doesn't have 4K or 5K videos, it does have 720p and 1080p on the newer sites and those are still the standards for high quality or high definition. On the recycling part, I do see that too but not on the newer sites. They're doing what every network does. They have dead sites, they have sites that are updating.
You even said you were able to download better versions of videos you liked before. That alone should put it over a 50. I also do think reviewing a site in a network that has 4-5 newer sites that are updating, without even mentioning those sites also goes against a 50. We're going to end up with a bunch of Brazzers, Reality Kings, type sites with no variation in the content.
I liked this network and still do. I thought the Petite 18 site was the only waste on the network. If I want to watch sex, I join a hardcore site. The newer sites they've added are at least interesting. If anything it seems like they have trouble listing their sites as they get new ones. I received an email from them (went to spam) that said they had added a new site called Shady Spa. It's found nowhere on the network but if you click it in the email it takes you to it and they have I think 8-10 scenes on it so far.
I think everyone is being a bit over-critical lately. Would you go to a pizza restaurant expecting cheeseburgers on the menu? It's a handjob network. Just being realistic and not at all trying to be an asshole. This network seems to be ran by a small group with no major backing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network dedicated to handjobs and making you sign-in a lot.
- Marked improvement since my last review in 2017, models are prettier, new themed sites, there's only so much you can do with a dick and a hand, but all kidding aside, there's nice improvements here.
- Good PU discount, their homepage doesn't show the discount and says it's $29.95 but once you click to join it gives you the $14.95 option.
- Easy to use navigation and while the network hub doesn't work the way you might like it to, I actually think it's better this way, will explain.
- 11 sites total, all except one are handjob/blowjob/tease related.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Downloadable videos (still can't believe that's a pro these days) and downloadable photo sets.
- I'm not for sure if it's the biggest handjob site/network but I'll get to the numbers in the bottom line. I think based on my memory it is the biggest handjob network.
- No ads beyond a page of ads when you first sign in.
Cons:
- The video download options and quality and filenames need some work. You have one full scene download option or you can download them in 4 parts. The full scene downloads vary from 480p, 720p or 1080p. You don't know what it will be until you've downloaded it and they're all named "high".
- This was a pro for me, it might be a con for you. The network hub shows all the sites available. When you click one, you have to login to it. That's frustrating for some but I will explain why I prefer it.
- Update schedule is kind of all over the place.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was after seeing a few of their scenes on tube sites. I think those scenes came from their site Club Tug which is the big site here. It was mostly older women, sometimes with a younger woman helping, in what was similar to CFNM with edging thrown in. They've since added multiple new sites. I think a common complaint for the older scenes was the models weren't always attractive. The newer scenes on their newer sites seem to be higher level models.
One con I didn't include is one I haven't ever figured out whose fault it is. Rocketgate is the biller. I have used them many times and I don't like that they store or remember your purchases and try to get you to sign up without putting your payment info in. One of the cards they have on file for me expired 2 years ago. Even worse, here on this site, it rechecks the pre-checked cross-sale, it also changed the price from $14.95 to $19.95. If the biller is doing this these sites need to let them know it's going to hurt their business.
The con about the hub requiring you to sign in on each site, which kind of makes it not really a hub. I like this better because you get a member's area that is exclusive to whatever site you sign into. So, when you click the model's list, say on their site Mylked, all the models are on Mylked. You don't get network-wide results. I prefer that. They do give you a randomly generated username and password so you have to keep on your notepad to remember it or copy/paste it in.
Club Tug is still the big site here. It has 436 scenes by my count, the hub says it has 500+, but just doing simple math of 12 scenes per page, 36 pages = 432 + 4 more on the 37th page. It's updating once a week. This site has a wide range of scenes from one woman giving the guy a handjob/blowjob while another woman watches and masturbates to grannies giving handjobs.
They have Tease POV which has 75 scenes and looks to be updating once per month. These are really good scenes that include more creativity than most handjob sites.
A newer site for them is Finish Him, it has 78 scenes and these are more like edging, some have two women, very good scenes. These newer sites they have really have added some life to the network. It updates once per month.
The newest site, Mylked, is the traditional milking table type scene where the woman lays under a table with the man laying on the table with his dick through a hole, kind of like horizontal gloryhole. There are 41 scenes on it and I would say they are some of the best on the site.
This is where it gets more complex. Cum Blast City looks like fake cum but after watching multiple scenes it looks real. This site would be very popular for those that like seeing a woman covered with cum. It has 320 scenes. The more I look at it, it looks like some of the scenes are fake dicks with fake cum, others are real dicks with real cum that must not have had sex in a decade.
Over 40 Handjobs has 240 scenes here and they're what they say, some are just an over 40 woman giving a younger guy a handjob, others are an over 40 with a younger woman giving a guy a handjob.
A fairly rare one with Ebony Tugs, there's 50 scenes of black girls over varying age, attractiveness and body type giving handjobs.
See Mom Suck is next with 112 scenes. This one isn't as good. Some of the mom's look like they just stepped out of the 1980s. Just being fair.
Mean Massage has 131 scenes, some of this is humiliation, but it's not that bad and some of it is quite good.
Teen Tugs has 211 scenes, these are very good and do good job of following the teen theme except for the few models that look like they probably have teenage daughters.
Last is Petite 18, it's out of place here, it has 71 scenes and they're all regular porn sexual intercourse scenes.
I did that so I could add the scenes up. That's 1,694 handjob-related scenes and I'm not counting the Petite 18 scenes in that number. I'm positive that makes it the biggest handjob site on the internet.
I spent more time on this than usual. It looks like the sites Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the newer Club Tug scenes are the ones with 720p or 1080p videos. The rest of the sites seems to 480p. I based that on downloading the 4 newest scenes from each site. I'm not going to take anything off for those but those 480p ones aren't helping the score either. I sit close enough to a 32" monitor that 480p isn't terrible. I'm more bothered by the filenames all being "high". I have a folder full of "high", "high (1)", "high (2)" and so on. I think with a little work there they could score even higher. I'm giving them a 13 point boost over my last score. They do seem to be working on improving the site and adding new scenes with better looking models, plus the higher video quality.
The different scenarios they use does make it a little more unique than other handjob sites, too. Recommended to tease, handjob/blowjob fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of teasing, Downblouse Loving is included as is Panty Loving.
- Great tagging system, will detail below in bottom line.
- There are 15,460 videos between the sites with right at 13,000 coming from Downblouse Loving.
- A clothing fetishist's paradise.
- Amateur models as far as I can tell.
- 4K Videos starting in 2018, 1080p, 720p also available. The older videos have 720p, so HD all the way back to beginning in 2009 and some of the 2009 ones have 1080p also.
- Most of the models are very attractive. You will find some you're not that attracted to but for amateur models they're consistently above-average in attractiveness.
- Some scenes go beyond tease. We will just act like those models got so turned on from teasing that they had to masturbate.
- CCBill is the biller.
- Four updates per day on Downblouse Loving and two per day on Panty Loving.
- 117 models on Panty Loving and 313 on Downblouse Loving.
Cons:
- One of my fetishes is going to show up here. I would like to see a lot more upshorts.
- It doesn't bother me but I know some are turned off by smoking scenes and there are some on here.
Bottom Line:
After my 99 on Zishy, a mostly tease, mostly non-nude site, I figured Downblouse Loving would be a site I would really like and I do.
I normally wouldn't cover the tags but I feel like it helps you get an idea of what type of content they have.
Ass, Boobs (topless), Dancing, Downblouse, Face, Masturbation, Masturbation Instruction, Non-Nude, Nude, Panties, Pantyhose, Peeing, Pussy, Revealing tops but not downblouse, Sleeping, Smoking, Toys, Up blouse, Upshorts, Upskirts and Water Pistol.
There's quite a bit more nudity here than your average non-nude/tease site. I don't know why they stopped the Water Pistol ones. They only have a few of those and they shoot a water pistol at a woman in a skimpy, see through shirt and see through panties. Maybe it's just they are fun to watch. Especially when you add the British accents.
My biggest clothing fetish is upshorts followed closely by upskirts. The downblouse is good when you see it here. I don't think I had ever really paid that much attention to the downblouse tease but they do a very good job of showing the woman doing regular, everyday tasks, and she bends over to pick something up with her shirt falling forward and you get a full view of her boobs.
This type of porn appeals to me. I have always said my favorite porn is the kind I can see happening everyday. I see women in loose shirts everyday. Now I know about what I could expect to see if I saw down their shirts. I think upskirt has the same effect.
The numbers are very high with over 15,000 videos and adding 6 per day between Downblouse Loving and Panty Loving. The videos are short. I have seen a few that are 5-6 minutes. Some are as short as 1-2 minutes. I think the short length of these videos adds to how much I like them. If you see an upskirt video that lasts 17 minutes you're going to lose the feeling that you're seeing something you're not supposed to see. If you see one that's 2 minutes and the upskirt is only fully exposed for 1 minute of it that's much more realistic.
My main complaint is they need more upshorts. Between the two sites they have 40 upshorts videos. In comparison, they have almost 2,000 upskirt videos.
The first time I ever used a TGP site it was to look up upshorts pictures and that was back in probably 2000.
I joined this site after reading mbaya's review and knowing that I usually like tease more than he does. I also used the method he talked about. There are no pictures but you can watch the videos in VLC and have it take snapshots. It's just like with any exhibitionism or teasing site. Sometimes having the still photo shows what you missed in the video.
I do think this type of site(s) has a broader audience than potential members realize. I would guess most of us started our interest in the female body when we saw up a woman's skirt or short or down her shirt.
Having the scenes with models doing everyday activities makes it even better.
One thing to notice is the model number to scene number ratio. Between the sites they have 430 models and over 15,000 videos. That means there are a lot of models on here with 30+ videos.
The video quality is impressive too. To have 15,000+ scenes with the worst maximum resolution being 720p tells they really go for the quality. Even though I don't have a 4K monitor anymore, the 4K scenes make for really great screenshots/stills.
They have another site called Only Looking and it says it was their first site. You can add access to it for $2.95 for a year. It also says the Only Looking Archives will soon be included with the membership to Downblouse Loving. They have a section of bonus videos also that are ones they decided not to use on their site.
It's a very good tease, some nudity, some masturbation site that lets your mind remember all those times you almost saw up a skirt or down a blouse. Add it to my list of sites to rejoin, especially considering how often they update.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A webcam site that does a lot of small things right that other webcam sites screw up.
- Currently 9,994 models, not all are online at the same time and some aren't active but they have a very good, large selection of models.
- Body types, looks, even ages are all well-represented.
- A credit/token system that makes perfectly good sense and to me is quite a bit cheaper to use than most cam sites.
- Models that don't make you think you're going to be broke before they're naked.
- What is probably the biggest pro is it feels professional, it's well-explained, it is easy to use.
- Some of the models go all the way nude without tips/credits coming in.
- Recordings of cam shows that you can buy with credits.
Cons:
- I think this applies to all cam sites, it can get expensive if you're not careful.
- Have to keep up with your favorite models schedule to see their shows. There's probably nothing that can be done about that.
Bottom Line:
I have started liking cam sites just over the last few years. I admit, I usually am just cheap about it and just watch whatever the model is willing to do without tips. That's one thing that makes this cam site different for me. There's not a tip menu that says you have to pay X amount of credits to get the model naked.
Their credits system makes logical sense which is unusual for a cam site. If you pay 25 Euros you get ... 25 credits. Most cam sites have you pay 25 dollars or Euros and they give you 250 to 2,500 credits and you feel like you got a great deal until you find out it takes 5,000 credits to get the model naked.
That is a focus of this review. Each model's cam has her price for private show in the bottom corner of her cam. I've seen some as cheap as 2 credits per minute. That equals out to a 12 minute private show for 25 Euros. That's pretty cheap compared to most cam sites.
You also can purchase recorded cam shows. Some of these are free too. The prices do vary greatly. I bought a 41 minute one for 5 credits. Right beside it was a 12 minute one that was 50 credits.
Continuing on the professional feel of the site, it's not like Chaturbate where you have 10,000 people sending a message in the chat box that says, "Show your ASS!" every 5 seconds. It seems more balanced here. The other viewers are respectful and the models seem to really enjoy themselves. I haven't seen one get mad. Most of them will give you a little flash if you ask nicely. Some of them will go completely nude.
As I mentioned, you get a good blend of slim, sporty, even chubby models. You could complain a little that nearly all are white.
They have tags that help you find the type of model you're looking for and they are for the most part accurate.
You also can get some enjoyment without spending a fortune. You could spend 100 Euros and get five 10 minute private shows from the models that charge 2 credits per minute. I don't really understand the difference in the prices from model to model. I've seen a few as high as 4 credits per minute. Maybe it's popularity or even seniority?
Either way, it's a very good cam site that you can join and have some fun without breaking the bank.
Since it's a non-descriptive email address, I made sure to put the site's name in the email and explain what happened. They had my access fixed that night. I think their system works on a midnight reset and that should be -/+ 0 timezone.
If you Google search, "adult time promo downloads" the second or third result says "includes downloads" and it's $9.95 a month for 1 month. The year subscription is $7.45 a month for downloads and streaming which is around $89. I've tried to duplicate a promo I used back in November but it doesn't work anymore. I was able to get a year with downloads and streaming for $46.50 by joining through an email promo for Bubblegum Dungeon.
I would expect them to use similar email promos for returning members in the future that offer the full downloads and streaming packages for very cheap. It seems to be the only real advantage to charging $19.95 for streaming only which is what it comes up as if you just go directly to Adult Time. They're overpricing and removing downloads to entice with email promos.
I've looked further into this as a longtime supporter of DDF. I think them calling it a rebranding is nonsense. If they remove the DDF site and replace it with the Porn World site it will be eliminating nearly half of the DDF content. I signed into the Porn World site with my DDF login, it redirected me to Porn Box which is a pay per scene site, I'm assuming owned by Legal Porn as it has a lot of their content on it. And the email I received was from Legal Porn Support.
Here's the differences I've noted between DDF (I can still sign in on it too) and Porn World/Box.
Porn World/Box says I "own" 8,445 scenes. These are all DDF scenes.
The DDF site has 15,891 scenes on it.
My owned DDF scenes on Porn World are in my "library" section and there's no model list, no category list, no way to separate the content by site (OnebyDay, House of Taboo, etc). It's just a big clump of nearly 8,500 scenes with no sorting options.
The Tainster Network made a similar change to Sinx about a year ago and completely ruined their network.
I'm hoping this is just DDF exploring possibilities and not something they're planning on switching to. If the DDF site is taken down and their content is only available on Porn World it will become one of the worst sites available. The similarities here and Tainster to Sinx is a lot of the older Tainster content was removed. Seeing that Porn World only has 8,445 scenes from DDF compared to 15,891 on DDF it does look like that's what Porn World is doing.
I'm downloading everything I've missed and/or wanted from the DDF site. On Porn World, when you try to download a scene it gives you a notice that your download will have a personal code linked to your account. If that scene lands on a sharing site even if someone stole it from you and put it on a sharing site it would be linked to you and used against you in court. You have to accept that on every video you download on Porn World. That's why I said it's not a simple rebranding and hopefully, it's not the future of DDF or they'll be losing a 15 year customer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge teen site that is a nice throwback to the Euro Porn Boom era 2006-2012.
- 3,831 models, 7,240 videos and 10,760 photo sets.
- Averages 1 photo set and 1 video update per day, with some days having a bonus streaming video.
- Simple to use download interface, videos and pictures can be downloaded. Details in bottom line.
- Something that's rare on a site this size, good tagging system, there's no way to know just how accurate the tags are but the ones I've used were accurate.
- Navigation makes it easy to find scenes like the ones you like, more in bottom line.
- Good variety in niches, solo, boy/girl, lesbian.
- Has a streaming only network with it with over 13,000 videos.
Cons:
- The bonus videos are ads for their other sites. You can stream the video. If you click download it tries to upsell you the other site.
- I try not to complain too much about ads but one I will always complain about is a moving ad (showing sex). It's just in the main hub page but those moving ads annoy me.
Bottom Line:
I can remember joining this site close to 15 years ago. The funny part back then, I was thinking Club Seventeen was Hustler's amateur series in their magazine, the user submitted section. Which I now remember was called Beaver Hunt. Club Seventeen was a good surprise back then and it still is.
I don't mean it as negative when I say it reminds me of sites from the 2006-2012 era of the Euro Porn Boom, that's as good of a compliment as you'll get from me. It's a huge site that focuses on pretty, young women. Where it has an advantage is their content is grouped into series' that make sense. For example, Kinky Teens, you can click that and it shows you all the scenes in the Kinky Girls series. It not only shows you the videos in that series but also the picture sets too. In the mood for Anal Teens? Click the series name and you'll find right at 300 scenes in the Anal Teen series. I haven't used this in a review in a long time since most sites don't do it anymore, the KISS principle of Keep It Simple, Stupid. It's nice to see a site doing that instead of giving me 16 levels of filters to click through to find 1 niche.
The content here ranges from great quality tease/panties to all out hardcore. Those that have read my reviews over the years know I love tease and solo masturbation, they do it very well here and I will say their hardcore is better than most of these teen sites that try and blend hardcore in.
They're doing good on the quality too. The pictures can be downloaded and newer ones are 2700x4000 or vice versa depending on the orientation. There are some 4K videos, they've had 1080p and/or 720p since 2011-12. When you consider how often they update that adds up to a lot of HD videos over those years.
I do think the series tags really gave this site a boost for me. One that I mentioned earlier, Teenage Masturbation as a favorite of mine. Clicking the series "Teenage Masturbation" brings up around 3,100 solo videos. Just like their hardcore videos are a little more hardcore than most of these teen sites, the masturbation scenes are more explicit too.
There is a large network of streaming only videos that works as an advertisement for other sites and gives you a sample of content from other sites, including the sites owned by Club Seventeen.
I'm probably always going to complain about moving ads. My vision problem is fairly well-known and has been talked about on Porn Users. It seems every moving ad is in the right margin, which my damaged eye is on the right so any movement messes with my eye and believe it or not, it agitates me.
One thing I'm not for sure about as I don't keep up with a lot of the newer models is if these models are pros or amateurs. Most look like amateurs to me. I haven't seen hardly any models I'm familiar with.
They have a unique feature that I only know of one other site using, the clip creator. You select a starting point on the video and ending point (no longer than 5 minutes) and you can just focus on the part you like the most. Videobox has a similar feature and that's the only other site I know of that has that.
This is one of the best teen sites I've joined and somehow, it took me nearly 15 years to make my way back to it. I'll be adding it to my yearly rotation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
I had joined it a few days ago. There is a portal on it now that goes to Porn Box. Once on Porn Box, it says the DDF content is listed under Porn World. From the best I can tell it's a pay per video system. It's also worth noting that once on Porn Box the support team and forum for it is Legal Porno, a pay per video site. The DDF site itself still works like normal. You have to click Porn Box to get to it.
Used to, don't know about now, you could sign up for a free account on Zishy and look at all the photos (no downloads, no videos). It's a lot like if FTV Girls had a prequel to their exhibitionism sets. I even once said I thought FTV ran Zishy but they don't. Their webmaster is very responsive too.
The first time I joined Zishy (2015), I thought it was good but they were more tame back then. As the years passed, the picture sets started becoming more risky and now, I just buy the year pass for $30, sometimes won't check in for 2-3 months, then login and download everything I've missed. Something I like about it and you probably would too, he's getting models that aren't ready for full porn. Some of them are as pretty as any models in porn.
I don't think there's much comparison between FTV MILFs and Zishy. Back in my very first review of Zishy, maybe in 2016, I talked about how the photo style, the settings (I'm a native of the west coast and know a lot of the locations) are very similar to FTV and there for awhile, the Zishy sets used to link to FTV when they shared a model. I haven't seen those links lately but Zishy does have the new style navigation which could have messed that up.
FTV MILFs is a lot like FTV Girls. There was a Black Friday special combining those two for $19.95/mo. There's exhibitionism, there's flashing, it's tamer than it was years ago but it's also less tame than Zishy. FTV MILFs brings in what I called "hardcore masturbation", big toys especially and they have the small hardcore male/female sets. I think Zishy is superior in photography to any site on the internet. Part of it could be my familiarity with the settings. His use of shadows is the best I've seen.
As for Zishy vs FTV Girls, that's a tough one. FTV Girls to me, if the split videos don't bother you, is in my opinion, the best porn site on the internet, especially at current time. They have even been showing a faster update schedule though it has slowed over the last few months. They were updating 5-6 times a month instead of the usual 4, which is a pretty big deal since those updates have 3-5 photo sets and 100+ minutes of video. I take a few months break from it each year but since 2015, have had a subscription at least 9 out of 12 months of each year. The only recent downside to FTV Girls is less exhibitionism than they used to have (legal problems). Even so, there's 15+ years of updates with exhibitionism in them. I like to keep an account to FTV Girls and Zishy nearly year round, easier with Zishy's 1 year plan. I use the 3 month plan on FTV Girls and it comes out to around $100 a year for 9 months. I wouldn't be surprised if I go 100 on FTV Girls just because I've joined it four times as many as any site over the last 15 years.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite in the softcore niche, still going strong.
- 9,989 scenes, includes video and pictures.
- 2,307 models, all are teens or at least look like teens.
- Downloads are unlimited.
- 11 new models in the last week. The schedule seems to follow that pace.
- Long forgotten bonus content that I'll mention in bottom line.
- Comes with the Nubiles Porn Network, but is a strong, standalone site as well.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Is one of the better values in porn, especially on the yearly deals.
- Navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I've always been between 88 - 97 on this site. The content at times does feel too repetitive and that's what I'm running into in this current membership.
- Shy and innocent can be attractive depending on the model but it can also be frustrating and feels fake with some.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those reviews where I feel bad that I've lowered it to a 90. I've been a member of Nubiles off and on for at least 10 years. It's one of the best tease, solo, masturbation sites on the internet but those types of scenes can become repetitive if the models aren't standout performers in the genre.
Technically, the site is superior to 98% of sites. While they don't have 4K videos they offer 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. Their picture sets are comparable to the big photo sites with downloadable zips in small 1200x800, medium 2400x1600 and large 3600x2400. With an average of more than one new model per day you can see that this site really doesn't need a network with it.
I mentioned the bonus content as I had forgot it even has bonus content. One of my favorite teen tease models is one of those, Katrina18, who I think had a lot more content on her solo bonus site than it shows now but she was a very popular model years ago. They have a bonus girls section and several other videos in the bonus section. They also show Sweet Kandie and Vicky Vane as being bonus sites you receive if you stay for 2 months or more.
Their navigation helps them even more. They have over 100 tags and each tag tells you exactly how many scenes they have with the tagged action. They have separate tag lists for videos and photos. They also have public tags for videos and photos.
There's a full, easy to use model list and something you don't see as much these days, an upcoming list of models that shows their next 3 models.
They also use CCBill for their billing.
You really can't find anything wrong with any of that. The content, really it's the videos, can be very hit or miss. I have watched 4-5 videos in a row without feeling anything that sexual about them outside of them being naked and cute. I think I have defended this in the past and will here too. A lot of these models are new to the porn world or at least in their earliest days, so there is some nervousness. I think from past comments, some viewers enjoy that, others don't. I fall into the don't group as I like to see the models looking confident and enjoying themselves. The ones that are not as confident don't look like they're enjoying themselves and look like their main goal is to get finished with the scene.
They do still film some hardcore scenes and it looks like they've dropped that to once per month. I don't usually download those as it's usually an experienced male model with an inexperienced female model and that usually doesn't do anything for me.
A feature I like in their navigation is the search by month and year. It works well here, I've seen other sites try it and between wonky dropdown boxes and bad clicks, it doesn't work well. It works exactly as it should here and the advantage to this is Nubiles has had their better years. Like most porn sites there are years or months where the content just doesn't feel as strong as previous months and years.
Another favorite part is the inclusion of major future stars before they were stars. Everyone from Eve Angel to Veronica Rodriguez to Valerie Rios has content here early in their careers.
It's very good content especially for those newer to porn and because I have heard this several times, for female viewers. I believe the perceived innocence is a big attraction for female viewers.
It's still a top-tier site in its niche, one of the best even but I just found myself a little bored with the content. I could also mention there's not a lot of variety in the races of the models which might hurt my enjoyment of it since I do like a variation in models. I would compare that to me not being as positive about ALS Scan as I used to be for the same reason. For most everyone else this is a site you should join at least once and give it a try as it's easy to use, easy to find what you're looking for and you're going to see a lot of naked, innocent, young women.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Evil Angel gets a boost in scoring for continuing to produce content that pushes the boundaries and not falling into a formulaic pattern of production.
- 18,318 videos as of 1/8/2020, 59 channels (will explain in BL), 4,972 models, 8.896 photo sets.
- 4K available on some scenes, 1080p/720p HD date back to 2011.
- Minor navigation improvements with major positive results, will mention in BL.
- If you have a fetish for it, Evil Angel most likely has at least some content of it (see BL).
- Two new scenes per day.
- Everything is downloadable and there are no limits.
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max.
Cons:
- There's content here you're probably not going to be comfortable with.
- They fall into funks, meaning there are times you feel like they've lost their vision but they seem to always find it.
Bottom Line:
Evil Angel was never a site that was made for a porn user like me. I like hardcore but I like sexy, pretty models more. They have the sexy, pretty models but some of the time they end up with smeared mascara and look like they got run over by a truck by the time the scene is over.
I once talked about this in a review of another site. I think porn in 2020, I've put 2019 in several recent reviews, I think it should cover as many genres and niches as possible. People are changing, what used to be something none of us would have dared watched, we might watch it now thanks to being desensitized to regular porn.
Here's a show of what Evil Angel offers: 1,298 lesbian only scenes, 2,133 transsexual scenes, 60 bisexual M/M/F scenes, and over 14,000 other scenes that have the typical, standard, M/F, Threesomes, gangbangs, orgies.
They've never made me feel like they give a shit if they produce something someone might not like and I like that about them.
Their long list of channels is a mixture of their directors and series. From big names like Jay Sin, Rocco Siffredi, Buttman John Stagliano to lesser known producers like Jazz Duro, legendary MILF Lisa Ann to production team husband/wife, LeWood. Their series include Anal Acrobats, XXXMailed, Panty Pops, and the one where they make me uncomfortable, Milk Enemas.
They are one of the few porn production houses that try to cover nearly all niches.
The minor navigation change they made, it might not be that new but I don't remember it from past memberships is the download button on every scene. It's in the corner of the scene, you hover it and it tells you the different resolutions the video is available in. You click your choice and it saves you the trouble of clicking on the scene then going through all the download options. Minor to most but a major improvement to me.
The navigation now has an Adult Time style to it but my Evil Angel access still doesn't come with access to Adult Time. I just happen to have a membership to both. The slider system works well. You can select to see lesbians, bisexual, transsexual and all other scenes or you can slide all to "None" and just pick a specific one you want to see. You can do any mixture of these. That seems like a very simple system to use but it's quite powerful and seems to be 100% accurate.
The video quality does vary as some of this content is over 20 years old. Around 2011 they started shooting everything in at least 720p and added 1080p shortly thereafter. It's hard to fault poor video quality from 10+ years ago. I've seen enough blurry, fuzzy upscaled videos to know I would rather it be left alone.
I do think the navigation has a few confusing parts. There's no longer a direct listing of categories. You can type in a search for a direct listing but that leaves you with the question of whether you're seeing everything you searched for. The categories are now listed down the left margin, similar to Adult Time and you click the eye icon beside each to remove that category. If you want a certain category, you click it and it shows which of their directors/series has those categories. That could be improved since you're going to have to go through every director and series to find what you're looking for but seeing that the navigation has improved overall, I expect it will continue to improve.
I will give an example of one I know is inaccurate. If I click "cum swallowing" it only brings up their series Cock Choking Sluts which has 200 scenes. I know there are more than 200 scenes on Evil Angel with cum swallowing. You have to go back to the main Evil Angel page and click on all updates, then select cum swallowing. That's what I guess would be called a learning curve. I've got used to it but it could be more user-friendly.
One of the better parts of Evil Angel is the length of the scenes. There are scenes that last over an hour and those are the ones the model ends up looking like she got ran over by a truck.
I don't think Evil Angel is for everyone but because you can get very good yearly prices, it's worth joining for a year to keep on standby for when you are in the mood for something harder. I think they do the hardcore scenes as well as anyone and they do so "usually" without going too far. Their series are also worth checking out. I think those probably started with the Buttman series some 20 years ago and the directors of these series seem to have a lot of passion towards them.
I think just about anyone could find some content they like here. I always do and it's my personal pick for the best hardcore site. Kink would be a little higher but I see it as more of a Fetish site than just hardcore.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my most highly rated networks on a consistent basis, not anymore.
- 53 sites unless some of those are just samples, Lil' Humpers shows up in my membership but only has 6 scenes on it.
- Some of the best mainstream porn on the internet.
- One of the top networks when it comes to diversity in their models, white, Asian, Latina, black, mixed, even transsexuals.
- Good navigation, you skip from site to site without having to sign in and their search engine shows all of the model's content, so if you find a model you like on one of their sites, you click her name and you'll see her other content.
- Almost always can be joined for under $10.
- Updates twice a day across the network.
- 8,399 models as of 1/8/2020.
Cons:
- You have to pay for downloads and the downloads cost more than the membership. Membership was $9.95, downloads are $14.95. It's not terrible to pay $25 for a site but it's a change that I don't like and that's a subjective opinion. I joined this site for years and had downloads included in the price. I think I paid $17.95 back then. Why not just offer the download package on the join screen?
- Their billing processor is the most frustrating biller I have dealt with. They try to offer you "discounts" that are more expensive than what you're paying for it. It used to be an instant, automated cancellation system.
- I will be taking on the long, frustrating task of adding up how many of their sites still update. Here's the number 9 of 53 sites are updating.
Bottom Line:
Reality Kings, for me, was once the best of the American networks. They had a huge amount of diversity in their models. They had creative, even fun sites (Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs), a whole collection of Latina sites, several Asian sites, black girl sites, now it looks like they've turned to RK Prime to release most of their new content on and it looks just like the porn on every other porn site.
I reviewed Brazzers not too long ago and was similarly harsh on it even though at that time, Brazzers had downloads including in their membership, I've heard they are now charging for downloads too.
I paid for a month of downloads at Reality Kings as they had some scenes I wanted to add to my collection but can't say I'll feel the need to do it again. The newer scenes I did download have lost all the fun and sexiness of their old scenes.
Their numbers are very impressive at 8,399 models and over 14,000 scenes but I have a lot of those scenes from 2015 and back. It seems like my favorite sites: 8th St. Latinas, MILF Hunter, Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs, In the VIP and Black Girlfriends, all stopped updating in the 2017-2018 span.
If anyone is curious, without the downloads package you can't even download photos or screencaps. All you can do is stream the videos.
It just feels like this upsell system gets me on the wrong foot. I found a few scenes I really liked but it really feels like this is my last time coming to Reality Kings. I felt the same way about Brazzers even with downloads included.
I'm sure there is a market for streaming only porn but I'm not part of it.
I won't go completely against it and say no one should join it. I think if you're new to it and don't mind paying the $25 price for the membership and downloads it's worth a month or two. There was a time when they shooting some of the best, even most creative porn.
I won't let them off the hook for the bullshit cancellation process. I chatted with an agent for nearly 15 minutes. When I would turn down a new "great offer" he would ask me to hold on. He would be gone for 3-4 minutes at a time. All he had to do was say, "Okay, got you cancelled" and I wouldn't have been happy about having to chat to cancel but at least would have appreciated them not making it a hassle.
Instead, I'm left with 15-20 new, good scenes that cost $25 and a lot of frustration and hassle. Hopefully, they will one day at least consider making the downloads an option for when you're joining and put in an automated cancellation system. There, talked myself into it. I won't be back until those things get fixed. The score isn't terrible because I think it still has value especially to a newer user, it would be about 10 points lower for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My once favorite ATK site, things have changed.
- Updates with 6 photo sets per week, no videos have been added since 2016.
- The photo sets are still as great as they ever were with around 150 photos per set, full teasing, full nudity, full spreading and close-ups. You also still get the old videos that are 1080p, they just aren't adding new ones.
- Good download speeds (80% my max)
- Some of the interview videos on Premium are some of the most realistic, less contrived as I've seen in porn interviews. If you have a favorite or favorites be sure to watch their interviews.
- A mixture of the different ATK sites, Exotics will be here, Petites and Hairy.
Cons:
- There's a dead horse somewhere and I keep beating it. Navigation is poor and tries to search ATK Galleria.
- What happened to the videos after 2016? I remember seeing something once about they had lost some of their content but there's not any new ones being added either.
- Why only one photo set per day?
Bottom Line:
ATK Premium was once a top 5 or top 10 site for me. That was back in the good ol' days of porn when Eve Angel resided as the queen of European porn. I once got in a heated discussion with one of the old ATK webmasters here on PU over their interview video with Eve where they made her actually cry by imposing on Hungarian traditions. I'm pretty sure one of the newer webmasters removed the video but they did try to make those interviews very real and very candid without falling into the same formula every site used for interviews.
One of my favorite Eve Angel videos came from here as she was masturbating in a bathroom, in an ATK office and just a room over they were doing construction/remodeling. Eve, the forever pro, kept looking around with each ladder crash but never lost her masturbating rhythm. If anything, it seemed to arouse her as the door was open and being filmed from the hall.
What you have now is a site that is just new photo sets of their most popular models. Their photography skill shows in these sets. It's an old discussion about how the best photographers can make a photo set more arousing than a video. ATK Premium could do that and while I don't know a lot of these newer models there's still some new favorites as mentioned in other reviews. Vina Sky has only 2 photo sets here but they are some of her most explicit photos.
You won't find many models that are unattractive here. Some might even come across as too attractive and made up for a site that keeps an amateur edge to it.
The numbers are still impressive with over 10,000 photo sets and 3,500 videos.
I once compared this site to being ATK's Greatest Hits compilation of their sites and still feel that way. They have top models from all their sites so you get a sample of exotic models, hairy models, petite models and amateur models. The ATK Network might hurt ATK Premium since it gives you a view of all their different content.
While the photos are 3000x2000 like the other ATK sites, I believe they use better settings here and it produces some of the best photos I've ever seen.
I wanted to cover the ATK sites since I was pretty harsh on their network. The network itself still has major navigation problems since you just switch from one site to the other and each site has navigation problems but they have added ATK Girlfriends to the network and I recently scored it very high. Just my luck, it wasn't in the network when I joined it but it is letting me sign in with a network membership now. If that network ever gets a hub page that connects all their sites I think they'll be one of the top networks on the internet. As it is, you can bounce from ATK site to ATK site and collect your favorite models. Many of which, with all sites combined, have over 100 photo sets and 30-50 videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- All petite models, 5'4" and under while weighing 110 pounds or less.
- Still updates daily but the updates are slower than the other ATK sites. Six photo sets and four videos over the last 7 days.
- Nearly all of the models are attractive and they have most of the well-known smaller models here as well as amateurs.
- I'm back to preferring photos, over 31,000 photo sets and 10,000 videos, all are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max)
- If there's enough sites in the network to your interest, it's a pretty good deal as they've added ATK Girlfriends to the network. I think ATK Girlfriends probably takes away some of the newer content from ATK Petites.
Cons:
- I had wondered if the advanced search had been switched but it's not on here. It has me searching ATK Galleria, which is a completely different site. Back to the model list and finding the models you like.
- I also can't get the tags to work with any kind of accuracy.
Bottom Line:
This site has always appealed to me. Not only are the models petite, they are usually sporty/fit built and that's a favorite of mine. I've seen the newer stars here like Allie Addison with 19 photo sets and 5 videos and Vina Sky with 37 photo sets and 11 videos. There's a lot of the models that look like amateurs and you will find more Asian models here, including some favorites from ATK Exotics (new sets here, not shared).
I think the first porn that was filmed was most likely of a petite model. They seem to be naturals at porn. They're more flexible (probably gymnastics background), they look tiny next to most men and the ones at least on here are cute and giggly.
I haven't seen many lollipops. That's an old PU joke.
The photo sets here show ATK's strength. A nice 100-150 photo set of a cute, pretty, down to earth dressed and make-up, girl next door. They take their time in getting her naked and you get to see every step up of it. It's almost like taking screenshots from a video. There's not too many pictures but almost always seems like just the right amount. You'll see every part of the model even the shy ones.
The videos here are good but there's nothing really exciting about them. The pros are better which isn't really better since you can see them masturbating and having sex on other sites. Vina Sky's videos for all the ATK sites combined became instant download, stashed in a folder. She doesn't seem to have a bad performance in her. The model I compare her to a lot, Veronica Rodriguez also has some really great content on here. Isn't it funny, I probably wouldn't be that attracted to either of them in real life as I'm not usually attracted to slender women.
What looks to be standard now for all ATK sites, 3000x2000 on the high quality photo set downloads, 1080p, 480p and mobile on the videos. The videos are mostly masturbation/tease and I think it's really more about if you're in the mood for that. There are plenty of good solo models on here.
Despite the lesser amount of updates, Petites gets a slight boost in score from the subjective side as these are some of my favorite models, especially in the current models. Adding in the large amount of Asian models, it makes it one of my favorite ATK sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ATK's Hairy and Natural site, not my favorite niche but even I like some of this content.
- Updates similar to the other ATK sites, 2-3 photo sets per day, 1 video per day except Sunday.
- Over 27,000 photo sets and over 10,250 videos. All are downloadable and there are no limits.
- Very few 4K videos, but 1080p goes back more than 10 years.
- I hate throwing a subjective opinion in the pros but a lot of the models are very attractive, there's just one group that goes beyond too hairy for me.
- I almost always prefer pictures on ATK sites but this one is one I prefer the videos.
Cons:
- Underarm and leg hair is going too far for me.
- The navigation like on other ATK sites is a mess unless you know who you're looking for. This problem showed more than on other ATK sites for me since I don't know a lot of hairy models by name.
Bottom Line:
Going through these ATK sites as individual sites since I don't think the average user is going to join the ATK Network until the price comes down.
The feeling here is similar to Galleria. There are many attractive models, the photo sets are high quality and downloadable. The videos could use a few more download options but they are good enough. I can't explain why I prefer the videos on this site over the pictures but I do.
You're going to see women here that are what ATK calls "scary hairy" and they can keep them. Before I face a lecture, I have aversions to body hair, including mine. I don't mind some pubic hair on women. I just see some of it as unkempt and dirty looking.
The photo sets are large (100+ photos) and the high download option is 2000x3000. The videos have 1080p, 480p and mobile options.
I do think the updates have been reduced but they are still much bigger than many sites with 2-3 photo sets per day and a video per day. They have a note on all their sites that they no longer are updating on Sundays.
I can appreciate their photo sets here just like the other ATK sites. They keep the model in her clothes for at least 20 photos which to me is a mistake a lot of sites make these days. It's nice to see what the model looks like in her clothes before she gets naked.
The advanced search engine on this site is a little different than it is on the other ATK sites unless they've changed it in the last few days. This one has 15+ boxes you can mark to search for (freckles, armpits, etc) then you can select to apply those filters to models, videos, pictures. That's a big improvement and hopefully they will do it on all the ATK sites.
I don't know where this ranks for a hairy site. I liked it well enough and I don't usually join hairy sites. I found a lot of teen models with just pubic hair, shaved legs, shaved armpits. Some of these models appear on the other ATK sites too and that's how I recognized them. It's another good offering from ATK and keeps filling their network out with a good variety of nearly every possible type of teen models. An added note here, there's quite a bit of pissing scenes (128 videos) for those into that.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite sites, but have lowered score a few points since my last review of it.
- Follows a similar format and style as FTV Girls.
- Nearly impossible to find a flaw with any of the technical aspects.
- Excellent tagging system that carries over from FTV Girls and works even better here with less models than FTV Girls.
- 240 models currently, the site has slowly but surely started building up a good sized archive with a new model added each week.
- One I really like, models originally starting on FTV Girls years ago are starting to show up on FTV MILFs, 5-10 years after first appearing on FTV Girls. The most recent was Trinity St. Clair.
- A potential pro or con, there's a higher percentage of hardcore male/female sets on FTV MILFs than FTV Girls.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max) and the site runs smooth with multiple navigation positives.
Cons:
- One that might not go over well with those used to FTV Girls, more pornstars are showing up here than FTV Girls.
- Would like more updates as there are months with 2-3 pornstars being in updates, with only 4 updates per month, it lowers the percentage of new first time models.
- No longer a con for me but I know it is for some, the videos are split into actions/parts.
Bottom Line:
The FTV sites have been in my top 5 sites for the last 5 years. FTV Girls still is and I would go as far as saying it's my #1 site after nearly 4 years of constant memberships. I still see FTV MILFs as a top site, it's just not quite as good as FTV Girls.
I'm going to be straight to the point with the newer models part. Of the last 7 models, 4 have been pornstars and I know it must be hard to find MILFs that are First Time Experiences but this slight problem also includes more hardcore scenes. Some sites can pull off the switch between solo site to hardcore but with the established FTV style, hardcore just doesn't work for me.
One of the biggest strengths of FTV MILFs are the models that are first time models but they project a confidence of an older woman who maybe has always wanted to get naked on camera. I think most men in their 30s and up have met at least one woman like this in their life. You meet her and she seems nice and you notice she likes to wear skimpy clothes. The next thing you know, she's showing you upskirts and you're having trouble keeping up with her sexual drive that you know she didn't have when she was younger.
I think the pornstars take away from that strength. I think the hardcore scenes take away from that style. Even the hardcore scenes with women that haven't been on camera before. It's like adding the guy, usually her real-life boyfriend or husband, makes it less porn.
All that explanation for removing 2 points.
Everything else is good. For example, the two newest updates are first time experiences and they're two of the better scenes on the entire site. It takes a skilled pornstar to shoot this style and make it feel like a FTV set. I use her a lot when talking about FTV MILFs, Aaliyah Love, she is very capable of being a tried and true pornstar that can make you think she's a first time on video model.
The navigation is one of the parts that keeps me around. My favorite niche in porn, these days, is exhibitionism. It doesn't have to be fully explicit. It can be teasing an upskirt and it works with these older models. Concerns about lesser exhibitionism on the FTV sites are not as high as they were a year ago. Of the last 15 updates, 14 have some level of public nudity in them and that goes even further with 19 of the last 20 updates having public nudity. Take it one step further and closer to a year, 39 of the last 40 updates have public nudity in them.
It's FTV's bread and butter or wheelhouse. They do public nudity as well as anyone.
The video quality has included 4K since January 2018 and those 4K videos have 12,000 bitrates. I don't download those but they are there for those who want them. I download the SD versions. These are 480p and they are high enough quality 480p that they're good enough for me. You also have the option of downloading 1080p if 4K is more than you want and 480p isn't enough.
My once major con of the splitting of scenes is no longer a con for me. I would even call it a pro for me. A lot of these models are best at the public nudity parts. I download the one to two clips of their public nudity but don't download the indoors masturbation videos. It's becoming a matter of efficiency for me. The quality I download also has to do with the model. If she's a model I really like, I download 1080p and usually all of her clips, not just the public nudity ones. I think that's a nice versatility to have in what you're downloading.
There are 240 models and I'll say I don't find all of them attractive. The ages vary from 24 to 54, those are more rare as you'll find the late 20s to late 30s the most common age range.
The main navigation lets you select from basics like age or breast size or alphabetical or date of release. The tagging system lets you select from Hardcore, 1st Time, Public Nudity, Fetish, Busty, Real Orgasm(s), Dildo and so on.
I do think it takes a little time to get used to the navigation as their tags don't jump out at you. They are just colored and labeled icons that you click. They all work with what looks like 100% accuracy.
Most of the scenes for the models average an hour or more of videos and 4-5 different photo sets with each photo set featuring a different outfit and location. It makes the one update per week easier to accept.
And while I complained about the hardcore scenes there are only 21 or about 10% of their scenes. Maybe that's a complaint that's really a compliment? I like their regular solo content so much that those small amount of hardcore scenes are standing out much more than they should.
As with any FTV content the photography and camerawork on videos is as good as any site on the internet, maybe In the Crack could put an argument for the best but both are nearly perfect in their filming.
I look forward to seeing this site about 5-10 years from now. Hopefully, not much has changed by then. It's still the best MILF site despite my 2 point deduction.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
