| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
I see your point, but in a sense "very good" and "even better" are the ONLY valid units of measurement :-) (everything else can be misused or even abused, for example, 5MBit/s sounds great, but only until you realize it is MPEG-1 or poorly encoded MPEG-4 in .MOV format from old Apple days).
If you want to know about bitrates and resolutions for NakedNews downloads, I can't provide much useful info for this specific site, because (as a fairly rare exception for me) I don't do any downloads on NakedNews (I don't see the point in storing "stale" news).
The only thing I've seen is their streaming, which is IMHO the best streaming I've ever seen. I've tried to measure it's bitrate and found that it's surprisingly low, somewhere between 500kBit/s and 750kBit/s, but visually it is MUCH better then "usual" streaming/downloads at this bitrate which you can find elsewhere.
For the record: I was their "Gold" member (the one for which they had "free 3 days" promo a week ago, not sure if it still lasts), for other types of membership YMMV (there should be some difference, shouldn't it?).
|
02-13-10 04:23am
|
Reply
77
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ditto to it. Kink.com sites are unusual and might be love-or-hate at least for some people, but they usually provide a VERY good idea about their sites in preview areas. And I can confirm that I had never seen DRM on any kink.com site (hope they still work that way).
|
02-12-10 10:59pm
|
Comment
78
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
|
02-12-10 10:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
79
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Oops, I didn't see it before, sorry (it's a side effect of going through "New Replies", it's easy to miss replies to somebody else).
|
02-12-10 10:47pm
|
Reply
80
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I see your point, but as I see it now (and as I've seen it yesterday), it doesn't redirect, at least right now. It is not a big deal, but if possible I prefer if you can keep my hard work spent on writing that review :-).
|
02-12-10 06:01am
|
Reply
81
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Shouldn't it be simply marked as 'clone' then? I've spent some effort writing review and it would be nice to see it somewhere again :-).
|
02-11-10 09:41am
|
Reply
82
|
Adult 4D
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Yes, please comment on real 3D options, because I've tried "cross-eye" method and while I was able to see 3D effect, it took too much efforts to enjoy it :-(.
|
02-11-10 08:05am
|
Comment
83
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
|
02-11-10 07:33am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
84
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks for explanation. From my point of view (as a customer of LostBetsGames) getting old stuff which has already been eaten (oops, sorry, sold) isn't a good thing, so I'm going to keep revised rating of 72 :-).
|
02-03-10 03:50am
|
Reply
85
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
What matters to me (and I think the rest) is the following: is it exclusive in the sense that this content can be found ONLY on LostBetsGames?
|
02-02-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
86
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Not really, thanks for heads-up (for some reason VirtualFem is not in 'sex games' niche).
|
02-02-10 06:36pm
|
Reply
87
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks for insight, but [beep], [beep] and once again [beep] (sorry for being rude, but I cannot help it). Obviously, reselling old content is much cheaper for them then making new one, but reselling old content using new production dates is something I can't consider an honest business practice.
BTW, maybe you can submit an error report on TBP to challenge their claim that "All content is exclusive (advertised as 100% exclusive.)."?
|
02-02-10 05:00am
|
Reply
88
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I deny any responsibility in the matter ;-).
|
01-29-10 05:19am
|
Reply
89
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Obviously it's a critical question, sorry that I didn't mention it in review (got used for this stuff to be covered by TBP :-)); I was able to find 8 games on the site, each about an hour of video. For me even $30 they're asking for is not THAT much for such original content, but obviously opinions can vary :-). There are 2 bonus sites thrown in too (MyDrFeelGood and PrivateHandjobs), but I cannot comment on them.
|
12-28-09 04:22am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
> Fun poll, asmith - It makes you kind of nostalgic.
I didn't think about this side when submitting it, but you're right - when reading it, it IS kind of nostalgic :-).
|
12-23-09 12:49am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
> Let's see: asmith12's answer was "Tried and got laid." ;)
Nice try :-), but I didn't answer until today.
|
12-23-09 12:42am
|
Reply
92
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
big johnny's Reply
Thanks for warning.
|
12-12-09 08:34am
|
Reply
93
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
submale2's Reply
Well, most of us here are "losers with nothing better to do". Except, of course, certain smart guys who're trying to make money out of PU by putting ridiculous ratings for certain websites, and even not bothering to write more then a few lines to justify it.
Sincerely Yours,
Loser with Nothing Better to do
|
12-04-09 11:20pm
|
Reply
94
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
Thanks, calculation follows:
51min 16sec = 3076 sec
4,675,992,829 bytes = 4,675,992,829 * 8 bits = 37,407,942,632 bits
So we have average bitrate = 37,407,942,632 / 3076 = 12,161,230 bits/sec, or approximately 12MBit/s . It is indeed HUGE (Asstraffic has about 8MBit/s); on the other hand, higher bitrate does not always guarantee higher quality, so it's a pity that Brazzers don't have an HD sample for public download, so everybody could compare their quality.
|
11-17-09 08:16pm
|
Reply
95
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
If you can tell me (for the same file) it's size in bytes (megabytes, gigabytes) AND it's length in minutes, I can easily calculate it's bitrate. Thanks in advance.
|
11-17-09 12:50am
|
Reply
96
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
> They do take up alot of space 4-5 GBs
Do you know what kind of bitrate they have? Or at least can you tell how long one single file is (in minutes) and how large it is (in gigabytes)?
|
11-16-09 01:55am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Yes, and also ALL the sites should be marked as RTA/whatever else, so browser filters (school ones and those installed by parents) are able to filter such sites out. While I really hate government regulation, I think THIS (site labeling) should be made the law (it does not create any problems while solving concerns of those who cares about minors accessing porn).
|
11-15-09 10:28pm
|
Reply
98
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
> Brazzers if brighter with much richer color textures.
With AssTraffic colors already being IMHO vastly oversaturated, I can't say it's a good thing if somebody has even more saturated colors.
> Put it this way, I have a very powerful computer that plays the
> Brazzers HD smoothly with no problem at all, but if I try to fast
> forward a scene it will not let me do it, the video freezes. No
> other HD porn has ever given me that problem.
And you see that "video freezes" as an ADVANTAGE for Brazzers?? No comments.
|
11-15-09 10:04pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
If we're speaking about the sites which say about "real people", I can agree it's (arguable) a kind of fantasy. But if we're speaking about the sites who promise their members a chance to get into shoot (which I think was the whole question of this poll), and using boyfriends of models instead, I tend to qualify it as an OUTRIGHT CHEATING; don't you agree?
|
11-13-09 10:15pm
|
Reply
100
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Reply
Oh, so not only their marketing, but also their programmers went downhill recently; doesn't look too good for them :-(. Still, if they refunded money, it's not a bad sign (most of the sites won't bother at all with refunding and even with answering e-mails these days :-(( ).
|
11-13-09 10:12pm
|
