| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
451
|
Vibrafoon
(0)
|
|
11-06-07 02:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
452
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
KodiakCS's Comment
> The update frequency seems to be 1/week, so it's like S&S
You're right, I've corrected my review, thanks.
> Wait a few months and we'll see, which site gets the crown...
I don't think there will be a single crown, I think both will shine to the benefit of the surfers :-). Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part though.
|
11-06-07 03:43am
|
Reply
453
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Review
> Guys, please treat women with respect
Couldn't agree more.
|
11-06-07 03:22am
|
Reply
454
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
If there would be such an option, I'd mark 2 entries - "Funny" and "Slow, sensual and sexy".
"Wham-bam" is boooooring, and female insulting is not my cup of tea - I love females :-).
|
11-05-07 05:20am
|
Comment
455
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
|
11-02-07 11:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
456
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
> The guy likes to put girls on the tour that are not on the site and in
some cases, he doesn't even plan on putting them on the site for
months and months. I think it's a very dishonest practice, and I will never join again because of it.
I agree that this practice is dishonest, but what else would you expect from the guy saying "Tricked into sucking for the camera" on his main page (which is either lie or crime) and upselling right from his home page?
|
11-02-07 11:28pm
|
Reply
457
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
never's Comment
Thanks, though I think this comment is more a review than a comment, and would be quite a good review :-), so I think you should start writing reviews rather than comments; IMHO it would be a valuable addition to the site.
|
11-02-07 11:19pm
|
Reply
458
|
About Voyeur
(0)
|
Reply of
Bacchus's Review
>*I actually had access to this site.
>*There are pictures of naked women on this site
It should be _really_ bad if these are the biggest pros :-).
|
11-02-07 06:50am
|
Reply
459
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I guess the TBP plan was a success.
You mean not counting newbies ratings? Yes, I agree, it was definitely a success (easily visible even now).
|
11-02-07 06:48am
|
Reply
460
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
It doesn't really matter. My point is that I'm not a lawyer and I definitely don't want to hire one because of this issue :-), so I tend to trust that major US companies do their legal research themselves (and kink.com IS a major US company without much doubt). After all, it will be them who prosecution will come after.
|
11-02-07 04:46am
|
Reply
461
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
And BTW another suggestion: to put average rating of user reviews into his profile. Would help to see if the user generally puts only high ratings, or only low rating which would help to filter out some bias.
|
11-01-07 02:54pm
|
Reply
462
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I think comment type was a good thing.
|
11-01-07 02:43pm
|
Reply
463
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
> Like every porn star could have his or own game.
Maybe we should ask them for games at least for PCs? At least it looks more realistic :-).
|
11-01-07 02:03pm
|
Reply
464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
> Perhaps I would play it if they made some X rated games.
Sorry to disappoint you, but chances look as good as chances for a cold day in hell. To sell video games for console developer needs to get approval of company which makes consoles, and I can't imagine Sony or MS or even Nintendo to endorse such a game, at least not until current perception of the adult industry in US changes radically. :-(.
|
11-01-07 01:34pm
|
Reply
465
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I was under the impression that bondage with intercourse on video was illegal in the US? Maybe this has changed without me looking.
I looks that site producers were under such impression too :-). There weren't such such sites in US until about the time when kink.com made their SexAndSubmission (about 2005). As kink.com is an US company, and pretty solid one, I don't think they're playing games with law, so most likely they've got legal opinion on it, which says it's ok. And as long as there wasn't any case law (which seems most likely), legal opinion is the best thing you can get to see if it is legal or not.
So I would rely on ability of kink.com to analyze it properly (at least until I'll try to shoot such a thing myself :-)). Just speculation on my part though.
|
11-01-07 01:26pm
|
Reply
466
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
zeusavg's Comment
Could you provide any specific example of such a horrible service?
|
11-01-07 04:03am
|
Reply
467
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Games? Yes
Game consoles? No
|
11-01-07 03:48am
|
Reply
468
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
> Can you also download the video in 1 piece?
Yes you can.
|
10-31-07 02:32pm
|
Comment
469
|
Naughty Athletics
(0)
|
|
10-31-07 11:02am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
470
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks a lot, I'll probably try both of them.
|
10-31-07 10:29am
|
Reply
471
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Normally I don't use download managers, but with joining PU I might eventually need one :-).
Could you please advise me on which one (ones?) you think is good for porn sites? (I definitely need something without nasty stuff like adware etc.).
|
10-31-07 10:12am
|
Reply
472
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
It actually depends on how much you're into this kind of stuff mixed with sex; if you REALLY like it - can be not a bad choice, as finding it isn't really easy elsewhere.
|
10-31-07 08:52am
|
Reply
473
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
dauthie's Comment
You should start writing reviews; I'm pretty sure they will be a valuable addition to the site.
|
10-31-07 08:33am
|
Reply
474
|
Femdom Time
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Reply
You're welcome dude! :-) BTW, see my recent review on LadySonia - it might be what you're looking for (or might be not :-) ).
|
10-30-07 01:04pm
|
Reply
475
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> Frankly, what you personally think I have the right to do or mention is completely irrelevant.
It is indeed very relevant to this site that you should comply with your own privacy policy, and I'm not sure your posts here are in compliance. What you did post may (or may not, depending on jurisdiction and other factors) constitute "individual user personal information", which your site claims to protect.
> When somebody blatently lies in a public forum and slanders a
> reputeable business,
And what exactly this "blatant lie" was? That you didn't issue refund? You agreed yourself it's truth. That he's unsatisfied customer? I tend to trust him on this one. So could you please mention what was the alleged lie?
> the truth should be aired and I have every right to state the
> absolute truth.
Do you really pretend to know what the absolute truth is?
|
10-30-07 10:25am
|
