Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. So you get access to a huge catalog of over 50,000 hardcore videos, photosets, and other goodies.
-21 Naturals has 975 videos, so it's a large channel (the sites at Adult Time are called channels instead of sites).
-Login and member pages are https. So your data is secure, and less prone to hacking, and the ISP record is less invasive (a record is kept of your accessing the network, but not the individual pages you view).
-The models are mainly late teens or early twenties, attractive to very attractive. Mainly white, but a few black.
-The models are enthusiatic and put on a good show. This is boy-girl (or man-woman, if you want to be politically correct) sex.
The action is basic sex: a combination of the guy eating the girl, the girl sucking the guy's cock, vaginal and anal sex.
Not over-the-top gonzo hardcore, but
-There is a zip file for a standard and a high-res photoset.
-The photosets average around 90 photos.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The photos are good quality pics. Not as good as MetArt or MPL Studios photos, but good quality for hardcore action sex. The standard resolution is 1920x1280 pixels. The high-res photo resolution is 5760x3840 pixels.
-Download speeds are good. I get 2-2.5 MB/sec off my WiFi network, which is about my maximum download speed for my WiFi connection. My hardwired Internet speed is supposed to be 200 Mbps, but the WiFi connection is always much slower than a hardwired connection.
-The technical support is first rate, one of the finest I've ever had. There is a live-chat option that is 24/7, and a human person answers almost immediately, within a few minutes. Compare that with my experience trying to talk to a tech support member at Spectrum, my internet provider. I can easily wait 30 to 40 minutes before a human operator comes on the line.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-There is a trailer and the full scene. So the trailer gives you a good idea of what the scene will be, and shows you what the model looks like.
-Videos have a short text description that summarizes the action.
-The channel is updating. It used to be a new video every few days, but since the coronavirus epidemic, the upate rate has slowed to once a week. Which is still fine, because the coronavirus has hit the porn industry really hard, along with entire United States.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are mainly minor. First this is a good channel. Second, and more importantly, it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which is one of the best bargains for hardcore porn on the Internet.
-The zip file for a photoset downloads with a generic numeric filename, so you have to re-name the file to know who the model is, and what the set is. Unless you keep a detailed record listing the numeric filename and all the details of the file, such as model's name, set title, channel, date posted, etc.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Although the navigation is mainly easy, because you have so much content at both the channel and the network, it takes a while before you can easily find the content that fits your taste. If you had less content to look through, it would be easier to find your best material. It's like too much of a good thing takes away from the experience. But that's human nature.
-The canned background music is distracting and reduces the value of the video. Get rid of it.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Channel stats:
Videos: 975
Video runtimes average: 20 to 30 minutes.
Average number of photos in a photoset: around 90
The standard resolution photos: 1920x1280 pixels.
The high-res photo resolution: 5760x3840 pixels.
Videos download with your choice of 160p through 1080p definition.
You can also stream videos in your choice of 160p through 1080p definition.
Unlimited streaming.
Unlimited downloading.
There are some memberships with reduced pricing where it's streaming only, but I think it's worth paying for a membership with downloading.
Site theme: A guy and and a girl decide to fuck. It's that simple.
Pros are that the girls are mainly attractive and enthusiastic for sex.
I think that the models at Wow Girls, Wow Porn and X-Art are, in general, incredibly lovely and are more attractive than the models at 21 Naturals. However, any PU member who was lucky enough to get one of these 21 Naturals girls in his bed would be foolish to kick them out.
A few plot summaries to give you an idea of the type of porn the channel has:
Longing for Each Other 21 Naturals
2020-03-13
Featuring Nata Ocean
Description
Sexy Nata Ocean feels horny and wants a cock to please her wet pussy. Renato offered his hard dick in exchange for some feet caresses.
So the descriptions are useful for giving a bare bones summary of the plot (the plot is basic: a guy and a girl decide to fuck).
"Nextdoor Brat", 21 Naturals, posted 2020-04-03, featuring Julia Red:
Description
Sexy young babe Julia Red is going to her hot neighbor's house with the intent of getting her sweet booty deeply pounded by Thomas. To get his cock ready to slip in her ass she sucks on it until it is well lubricated with her saliva. Thomas then pounds her tushy making Julia moan of intense pleasure. He then finishes by busting all of his love juice straight in her mouth.
So the description is not a love story, but an accurate telling of what the action is.
ANAL DEBUT on 21!!!, 21 Naturals, posted 2017-06-03,featuring Zazie Skymm
Description
On a rainy afternoon blonde sweetheart Zazie Skymm is ready to give her anus for the first time ever to her hung boyfriend Nikki Nuttz. As the rain hits the windows the all natural blondie gets her tight butthole fingered and her pussy eaten at the same time. Feeling her rectum itching for a penis the daring blonde sucks and lubricates the stud's dick. The sodomy session starts slowly as Zazie gets used to the feeling of an erect cock in her anus for the first time, but things get intense fast and she is seen riding the cock with her ass like there is no tomorrow. In the end the lovely nymph will have her anus gaped and her face covered for cum with a definitive desire to do it again soon...
Zazie Skymm is one of the most beautiful models at the channel. Lovely face, great body, she is just lovely and passionate.
I wish she did this video at X-Art or one of the Wow sites, becasue the sky seems overcast, or maybe it's the filter they used, and she deserves better lighting to highlight how attracive she is.
Bottom line: I'm giving the channel a score of 88.
Not only does the channel have 975 videos, but you also get access to the Adult Time channel, which is one of the best bargains in porn today, due to the massive catalog of hardcore videos and the wide range of niches covered, plus a boatload of attractive female models.
CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY:
Maybe I should add that Pure Taboo (one of the Adult Time channels) is probably my favorite story-based porn.
Some of the stories can be interesting. Even though they often border on the un-believable or strange, the stories can add meaning to the sex, and the sex can be hot. It also helps that the models can be attractive.
So I don't mind if a scene spends a lot of time on the set-up, if the set-up is done well.
Excellent review, as usual.
But I don't agree with with one of your cons.
"The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes."
This is not a criticism of the review or your ideas.
But I personally find that sex scenes that go over 15 minutes start to get boring or repetitious for me.
I like the idea that there is a setup to the sex scene to give the sex more meaning than 2 or more bodies slapping together.
But when the sex goes on too long (and I think 15 minutes is plenty long for a sex scene) then I start to lose interest. Maybe it's my mind just doesn't appreciate all the details of sex, but I don't usually consider sex an endurance contest, and, while I can admire some of these models for their stamina, I personally prefer a much shorter version where the models start slow, then build up to a climax. A sex scene that goes 15 to 30 minutes usually indicates multiple orgasms for the female, which doesn't turn me on. Get the model hot, get her off, then cuddle or show appreciation, or don't show appreciation, whatever fits the scene.
That's just me.
Other people can have different ideas or appreciations.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network.
-You get access to about 18 different sites with a membership.
-Epoch is the default biller, a trusted name. Easy to cancel.
-The site has a number of attractive teen models.
-The content is exclusive.
-Newer videos offer the choice of definition for low, medium, high, and 4K videos.
That is for downloading.
-Newer videos offer streaming in 240p, 720p. 1080p.
Cons:
-If you join the site directly (Young Libertines), you pay a much higher price than if you join through the 18videoz site: the 18videoz site gives you access to Young Libertines, as well as other teen sites).
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-PU also has a discounted price of $59.95/year for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The public page shows cute models in the thumbnails, but the page looks like it was designed years ago.
-Username and password are computer generated. A random mix of letters and numbers you have to write down.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So prone to hacking.
-Some of the thumbnails, instead of loading a video you want to watch, are ads that load a new site that you can join. Annoying that the ads aren't clearly marked as ads.
-Slow update rate. One video/month recently. Was 2 videos before.
Bottom Line:
The stats are for the 18videoz network.
When you log in to the site, the stats shown are for the network, instead of for the site by itself, although you don't realize that until you check further on what the network stats are.
Trying to check what the stats are for the site, by itself, would take a lot of time and effort.
Which is different from what many other porn sites do: many porn sites show clearly what the number of videos, models, photosets are for the individual sites.
Network stats:
videos: 3202
models: 2243
photos: 210518
photosets: 2441
The Young Libertines site was launched in 2008.
It started out as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore vidoes. Although they used attractive teen models, the videos were cheaply made: No effort was made into making the models look pretty. The technical factors were poor: poor lighting, poor sound control, cheap sets (mainly rooms that look like they are run-down public housing).
The current public preview page is old and should be updated.
The main con is that the site started out years ago as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
And it's still seems like a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
Although the site might have been a worthwhile join back in 2008, when it was first starting out, the site is poor choice for your money in today's world, where the porn offerings on the internet are far superior to what you will find at this site.
To make it simple:
It the content worth viewing? No, it's not. The models are attractive, but many of the videos are poor in quality because of the cheap sets, poor lighting, poor costumes, cheap video equipment.
They really need to update the site, to make the overall site more attractive, to clearly separate the newer videos from the older, lower-quality content. Otherwise, you get the impression that the entire site is a jumbled mess of low-quality porn.
The price is cheap, if you join through the 18videoz site, instead of through the more expensive Young Libertines site. But even with a cheap price, the contents at the Young Libertines site are a waste of time and money. Unless you can find some videos at the other sites in the network that are worthwhile, you will regret joining the Young Libertines site.
Although site navigation and other factors are important in scoring a site, if the content is not worth viewing, who cares if the site navigation is easy?
The site navigation is easy, but you are looking at low-grade videos that are a waste of time.
Although they have upgraded the videos over the last few years, the videos still seem like cheaply made videos. They are more like home-made videos instead of the excellent videos you can find at X-Art, or the Wow porn sites, or the better quality videos at Teen Mega World.
I honestly don't know why the videos seem like home-made, amateur videos. Unless that is the vibe they are going for.
The videos at the other sites I mentioned are so much better in quality and visual appeal.
Edit: I am slow. They are going for the home-made, amateur video vibe.
And that's why I don't appreciate the site.
I much prefer the X-Art, Wow Girls and Wow Porn style of professional quality videos.
Excellent first review.
Nice details with real thoughts and reactions.
Hope you stick around, and write more reviews, post comments, whatever you feel like doing.
As far as the raffle is concerned, I believe it's currently being held once a month.
The last raffle was the first one in the once-a-month program.
So the frequency can change, the prize money can change.
But consider the raffle prizes as an extra bonus: the main purpose of the reviews is to give your fellow PU members a heads-up on the value of sites, whether they are worth joining or not.
Of course, a person's interest play a large part in the sites they choose to join.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network, one of the premium glamcore networks on the internet.
-There is unlimited streaming of videos.
-Unlimited downloading of photosets.
-But there is a network download limit of 100 videos/month. This video limit is clearly shown.
-The content is exclusive.
-PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month recurring.
However, since Bums Bus is part of the LetsDoeIt network, it might be cheaper to buy a membership directly through LetsDoeIt, to access the Bums Bus channel. LetsDoeIt special discounts are often found, while Bums Bus specials are less frequient.
Cons:
-2 Pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-The dialogue is in German. Some of the videos have subtitles. But whether the video has subtitles or not doesn't matter: I don't care what they are saying. You read a few subtitles, you get they are making jokes and having a good time before and during and after the sex, and it's all pointless: unless you've really drunk, and think these jerks are really cool studs. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time and video, and let's switch to a better channel.
-Appears to be an archive site. The last update was 2018-12-13.
-There is often a lot of filler material on a video before you get to the nudity or sex.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: German girls are given a ride in a bus and have hardcore sex.
The bus is actually a van.
The site has 134 videos.
-Although the channel is part of the LetsDoeIt network, this channel is not glamcore.
The vibe they are going for is trash porn, with a dose of humor.
It's like an updated version of the Beatles "A Hard Days Night", with the frenetic camera work and a low-trash hardcore porn twist for the intro section of the video.
The description for the last updated video (posted 2018-12-13) is as follows:
European girl has sex for money
"Jason Steel convinced the beautiful Kim Davis, a student, to have sex in front of the camera for money. This European girl didn't hesitate to say "yes." The two of them get into intense action on the back of the van. See how this German beauty sucks and takes dick in pussy for cash!"
Jason Steel is the main stunt cock for this video.
Kim Davis is described as beautiful.
She is nice-looking, but I wouldn't call her beautiful. Except this is porn, and they exaggerate everything anyway.
The video runtime is 42.03.
You don't get to the sex or any nudity until the 20 minute mark, where you start to see her topless.
From there, you eventually get to the sex. Except by then: I'm thinking why have I wasted so much time on this video? Or this channel? When the other channels are so much better to watch.
The models at the other channels are better looking. And you get to the sex so much faster. And the sex at most of other channels is easier to watch.
Or you can switch to a different network, where the girls are attractive, and the sex is good.
I'm giving this channel two thumbs down.
I've seen worse sites, and the technical factors of the video are good, except I've used up my patience waiting for something good to happen.
I'm giving the channel a score of 70.
And that's only because if you joined this site, you also gained access to the rest of the LetsDoeIt network, which has some very good sites.
Side note: I selected that I've been a member of the site/channel for over 12 months. That's because I've been a member of LetsDoeIt for over 12 months, which gives me access to this site. If Bums Bus was a stand-alone site, I would give it a score of 50.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the nubiles-porn network, so you get access to the entire nubiles-porn network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-I really enjoy the on-screen photo viewer. It's easy to use, and you can control the speed the images remain.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content.
-The site watermark is small and located at the bottom right corner of each photo, so it's out of the way.
-The models are young, attractive, slender teens, and the stunt cocks look like they could be real ballet dancers, adding to the fantasy. There isn't much of a plot or build-up: the female model is dressed as a ballerina, doing a few moves by a barre (the stationary handrail that ballet dancers use). The male dancer shows up, they might kiss or hold or touch each other, then they have sex. But the set is clean, the costumes simple dance outfits, the colors are strong and real, the technical features (focus, lighting, sound, etc) is very good.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photosets average over 100 photos per set. These are good quality photos. Much better than screencaps.
And since the models are attractive, the photosets are worth keeping.
The photosets come in multiple definitios for download in a zip file:
1200x800px, 2000x1334px, 7952x5304px.
The videos come in multiple definitions for streaming and download:
270p up to 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. Only 39 episodes.
-Archive site. Or you could say it's a site with a very erratic, slow, update rate.
-This is not a con against the site, but both the PU site and The Best Porn site say the one year membership is free.
That seems to be a mistake.
On The Best Porn site there is the notice:
"Simply enter the site (this link or any on this page) and look for the lower price on the credit card billing page."
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I click on the link at The Best Porn, hit the join link at Petite Ballerinas Fucked, and see a price of $99.95/year, recurring. That is a sale price, but it's not free.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site (also called a series by nubiles-porn) was started in 2015-09-02.
The site only has 39 episodes, so it's a tiny site.
The update rate is very erratic: sometimes there is one video added in a month, then months go by with no new videos. The last video was added 2019-09-08, so you could consider this an archive site, or a site with an amazingly slow update rate.
That is a shame, because the quality of the videos is excellent: The models are petite (tiny) girls who are dressed in ballerina costumes. A stunt cock comes along, in theory the girl's dancing partner, and they have sex. The visuals are outstanding: clear, crisp visuals for the video. The girls are white, slender, young.
Not too much make-up, but they are just luscious. Maybe not the right word: striking and adorable and eminently fuckable is a better way to describe the models. (Pardon the French, LOL).
The sex is not harsh: it's more like a girl and a guy with strong sexual drives getting off together: not love, just sex.
What makes it memorable is the girl is slender, white, young, attractive, and she's dressed in a ballerina costume. Doing some dance exercises. Then the male dancer appears (he looks like he could be a real dancer).
So there's a small element of realism to the video. And the couple is clean. And attractive. And the sex is good. Not great. There's no harshness or violence or cruelty to the sex:
It's an interesting site. A niche site, because the theme is slender white ballerinas who are having sex with their dance partner.
But since the site is so small (only 39 episodes), you'll be able to download the entire site, or what you want to keep, very easily. And in a short time.
And since there are little to no updates, you will then move on to the rest of the network, which thankfully has enough material to keep you occupied for a good while.
There are 17 sites (or series) in the network.
Covering different niches.
Scoring the site is not easy:
Because the site is so small (39 episodes, remember), and there are few if any updates, those are large negatives.
However, the videos and photosets are first rate, technically.
And the girls are slender white teens who are very attractive. I say teens, they look like teens, but some could be in their early twenties.
So if that's the kind of model you like, the score goes up.
And with network access, the score goes up even more. The nubiles-porn network is an excellent network.
So I'm giving the site a score of 88. That is very subjective.
Excellent review.
You put a lot of time and effort into making the review a good overview with lots of nice details.
Nice to see you contributing again.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are working constantly to update and improve the site and network.
-They did a recent update for the network public page, making the page brighter and more inviting.
The network public page shows nice-sized thumbnails for latest videos, featured videos, newest girls,
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 33 teen porn sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates around 5 days a week, with exclusive content.
-The site (and some of the network) has 4K videos, as well as lower definition videos.
-The site (and some of the network) has high resolution images.
-Navigation is easy. It's easy to switch between sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Although this is not a glamour site or network, the girls are basically white teens who are attractive.
Cons:
-If you join through the main TMW site, the search returns content from the entire network.
However, if you join through one of the other sites in the network, the search returns only content from the site you joined through. So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site.
-I think they did a recent update on the search engine and messed it up. Assume you log in through the TMW site, and not the First BGG site. You enter the name "Lolly Small" in the search. What you are returned is a huge number of hits, most of which have nothing to do with Lolly Small. The search for "Lolly Small" returns 301 results. And Lolly Small only has 10 videos at the network.
I've been a continuous member of the network for over 3 years now, and the search at the TMW site used to be good, returning only results that matched the model's name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So easy to hack.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Although the network has a daily update, the update rate for the site is approximately 1 per month.
2018-11-27 the site had 110 videos.
2020-03-17 the site has 121 videos.
So over time, the update rate is less than 1 per month.
The reason for the slow update rate for the site is that updates are spread over the network, so the BGG site gets less than 1 new video plus matching photo set per month.
Which is more than acceptable, since there is a huge amount of teen content in the network to look through.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as familiar as CCBill or Epoch. But I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem. So I'm listing it as a minor con, but it's not really a con. I've used Vendo for WowGirls, DDF Network, Ultra Films, Lust Week, etc.
-Many of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The quality of the archive sites is definitely less than the current output of videos and photosets. Some of the archive sites do not have streaming; you have to download the video or photo set to see it.
-The photosets have a zip file, but it's only in 1 definition, not low, medium and high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: One guy on two girls. Forget love, these girls are interested in sex. And they are willing to share a guy.
Site stats:
videos: 121
photo sets: 121
As you might be able to tell, TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
This review is on First BGG, but I believe the details on the TMW network, of which First BGG is part of, can be helpful.
What I like about the site and network:
The models are mainly attractive young teens, who put on a good show: they seem to enjoy the sex.
The models are real teens. Not a lot of fake boobs. Not a lot of tattoos.
This is not a glam site or network.
The network started around 2005.
The site (First BGG) started around 2011.
The network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore collection of sites.
Over time, they have spent a lot of time, effort and money into upgrading the network and included
sites.
For the last few years, you can stream or download the most recent videos in 360p up to 2160p.
The upgrades included:
With a membership in any site in the network, you now get access to all the sites (currently 33 sites.)
Better equipment for filming and photographing, better, more expensive sets, better costumes (the costumes are street clothes, but better street clothes than what they used to wear), better lighting, sound control.
The videos and photo sets from the last few years are excellent quality: not glamcore, but still excellent quality.
The quality obviously gets worse as you look at the older material.
First BGG is part of the TMW network. TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore network. I wouldn't say that First BGG is one of the top sites in the network, but it is a worthwhile addition to the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is basically because joining any site in the network gives you access to the entire network.
If I had to score the First BGG by itself, without network access, the score would be much lower.
But it's still a good site, with 121 videos and matching photosets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-An outstanding glamcore network. Many of the models range from attractive to freaking lovely.
-The White Boxxx channel, part of the network, is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
Not only are the models lovely, but the sets and makeup and costumes and filming techniques combine to make the models as lovely and glamourous as possible. Most models that appear at this channel are at their loveliest, and look better by far than at most other porn site appearances.
-The network has 17 channels. Some are archive channels that no longer update. But the best ones do update, especially The White Boxxx.
-Contents are exclusive.
-The network has all the trimmings of a high quality glamcore network:
-The videos can be streamed and downloaded in low, medium and high quality.
-Each video has a intro section, which can be skipped when streaming.
-The videos can be streamed in regular or slow motion.
-The videos and photo sets have multiple choices of definition.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The search covers the entire network, instead of a single channel.
-You can vote to like, dislike or choose as favorite.
-Can also comment on each video or photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. Especially when I consider the value of The White Boxxx channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The photo sets are tiny. Average 10 photos per set. Some of the models are gorgeous, and deserve a full gallery to feature their beauty.
-The search could be better. If you enter a model's name, such as Lena Reif, it returns all instances of any model with the name of Lena, instead of just instances of Lena Reif.
-This is a nit-pick. The White Boxxx videos focus on such high quality glamcore that the videos lose a little steam. They are great in visual quality and eroticism, but lack the impact of the Porn Fidelity, Teen Fidelity videos, which are high quality gonzo porn (I don't know if gonzo porn is the right term, because the Porn Fidelity/Teen
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Fidelityporn can be raw and powerful).
-Some of the channels are archive, that haven't updated in years.
-A nit-pick. Although you can vote to like or dislike a video or photo set, all I've seen are likes.
Not a single dislike of a video or photo set. Which seems unlikely.
-A nit-pick. Bottom of member page has a few small ads. Easily ignored.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Maybe I'm biased, but a few scenes from The White Boxxx channel are worth at least one month's membership price.
The first video I watched at the network was "Sensual threesome sex with a lucky guy".
This is at The White Boxxx, with Lena Reif, Shona River and Lutro (Lutro is the stunt cock).
Posted 2018-11-30.
For high quality glamcore sex, it doesn't get any better.
Watching Lena Reif's breasts swaying in lovely motion is truly poetry in motion.
Lena Reif, attractive face, lovely body, a wet dream come true.
And Shona River is a luscious babe, as well.
Except compared to Lena Reif, nobody compares to Lena Reif, great face, fantastic body, Lena Reif can put on a show that is priceless.
Network stats:
Number of channels: 17
Number of videos: 1,481
Number of photo sets: 1,468
Number of photos per photo set: 10
Bottom line update:
I am blown away by The White Boxxx channel of this network. I think it's the finest example of high quality glamcore porn on the internet. The models are georgeous, they are shown in expensive sets that highlight their beauty. The emphasis in on eroticism rather than sex, although the sex is hardcore.
There are defintely other channels in the network worth checking out.
And plenty of lovely or attractive models throughout the network.
But the crown jewel of the network is The White Boxxx channel.
I've giving the network a score of 95.
Join for a month, to sample their wares.
To see if a longer membership is to your taste.
I've joined the network for over 1 year now.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-One of the best hardcore teen networks around. There are many fine teen hardcore networks, and this is one them.
-I consider Nubiles.net the star of the network: Nubiles.net is like an encyclopedia of teen porn stars, and usually gets them around when they are starting out in porn.
-You get access to 17 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches.
-The models are basically young teens and are pretty to fucking attractive.
-You also get some milfs. So there is variety in the age selection. But the models are basically white. Not much other races such as Asian or Black.
-CCBill is the default biller. Epoch is also available. Two of the best billers around, for easy cancellation and service.
-Although I don't usually like ads, some of the ads for porn sites are the lowest prices I've seen.
Example: $79.95/year for LetsDoeIt, a fine network for glam porn.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Online slideshow of photos has control of how long each photo is shown.
-Most videos have a matching photo set.
-There are no download limits that I have seen.
-You don't have to pay extra for downloads. A lot of other sites are starting to charge extra for download privileges.
-You can stream or download in low, medium or high definition.
That applies to both video and photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is one of the better networks for hardcore teen porn.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Some PU members have complained that Nubiles.net is not included with Nubiles-porn. That is wrong.
You just have to find the drop-down menu at the site to see Nubiles.net site is included.
-Although navigation is simple, you have to find the tiny download icon to see what sites are available.
Bottom Line:
Nubiles-porn stats
Videos: 1329
Videos are available in definition: 480p - 1080p.
Photo sets: 1268
Number of photos per photo set: approximately 40 to 100+
Size of photos:
Large 5760x3840px
Medium 2000x1333px
Small 1200x800px
Number of models: ? I don't know how to estimate the number of models from the different sites.
Especially when you include the Nubiles-net site.
One of the benefits of joining a hardcore porn network is that it teaches you about life.
Saving water is important. Especially in California.
So if you have an attractive step-sister or step-mother, it's OK to share a shower. Not only are you saving water, but it can be a lot of fun.
Watching the videos at MomsTeachSex.com, you soon realize that step-moms have a wisdom that comes from experience, and they can teach both their step-sons and step-daughters valuable lessons in sex and life attitudes.
For example, the "Moms Valentines Day Fun" with Anya Olsen and Krissy Lynn: the step-son, Oliver Flynn, is kind of a moron. When his step-sister wants to suck his dick, he objects, because she is his sister. But the step-mother, the kind, caring and attractive Anya Olsen, tells Oliver that families should care for each other. And soon Oliver, Anya and Krissy are in a 3-three, for the Valentine holiday.
This is one sweet message that MomsTeachSex can tell us.
Sex is good. Sex is caring. Sex is healthy.
Bottom line:
Nubiles-porn is one of the better networks for hardcore teen porn.
I am basing that on:
-The models range from attractive to fucking attractive.
-You have a large number of models.
-The low membership price. During holiday specials, you can sometimes find a yearly membership for $90 or less.
-The wide range of niches covered.
-The network is easy to use. Easy navigation.
-The technical quality of the videos and photo sets is very good to excellent.
If you look at the Beata Undine page at Indexxx.com (a free database of porn stars), you will find that Beata has been featured in a large number of porn sites.
If you want to find additional material for her, it should be very easy.
The indexxx.com page shows the sites she has be featured at, as well as the number of appearances at each site.
Diamond status refers to the old system of membership, where there were different levels of membership.
If you had diamond status, you had access to the three sites:
All Fine Girls Wow Girls Wow Porn
Under the current system, you are automatically given access to those three sites, if you join any one of the sites.
The All Fine Girls site was created by using the 18 Only Girls site, plus a small amount of content from some other sites. Most of the content from the other sites was dropped, and the site names were dropped/ended as well.
That happened several years ago.
As far as I know, there are no archive sites in the 3 sites I mentioned.
However, there are non-member sites that hold some photosets and videos from the 3 sites, that might hold some other content that was dropped.
You can also find some of the 3 sites' content on tube sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-197 videos. Not huge, but still good sized for a hardcore teen site.
-They updated the online video player in 2016.
-Expired members get free limited access to the website. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of the latest updates.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not the biggest name in payment processors, but I've used them many times, and never had a problem.
-The models are late teens or early 20s. Not super attractive, but not ugly.
-PU gives a discount of $14.95 for the first month.
-PU also gives a discounted yearly membership of $59.95/recurring.
-Membership in 18Flesh gives you access to over 9 main hardcore teen sites.
-More recent videos are up to 4K definition for other sites in the network.
-Althogh 18 Flesh is not updating, the network is updating, so there is fresh material to enjoy.
-After you've logged in to the site/network a few times, the site will normally recognize you, so you don't need to re-enter your login details each time.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can vote on each video, up or down. Considering the last video was posted over 8 years ago, there are very few votes on most videos, and the number of downloads of most videos is often less than 1,000, which means very few people have bothered to collect these videos.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-This is an archive site. The last update was on 2011-12-15.
-Non-secure login. Meaning your login details are easily hacked.
-Non-secure member pages. Meaning the pages you visit are recorded by your ISP and available to spy agencies and the police as needed.
-The username and password are computer generated, so you need to write them down.
-The video definition is low: you have a choice of 240p or 480p. Most PU members would require a far higher definition, if possible.
Bottom Line:
Site Videos 197
Site Models 2241
Site Photosets 2439
The Best Porn states the 18 Videoz network had 3,027 video on 2018-06-27.
On 2020-03-12, the number of videos is 3198.
171 videos added in 20 months indicates a slow update rate to the network.
The 18 Flesh site itself stopped updating on 2011-12-15.
You get 2 additional bonus sites with a membership (the 1-day trial membership do not get access).
The sites are Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club.
The also have a live sex cams channel, with over 2,300 models.
Many of the models are men, so I assume that is for gay audiences.
(Man, not interacting with a woman.)
I'm not interested in cam shows, so I didn't investigate the cam shows, even though there are both "online", "party", and "gold" shows available.
The cam shows can be viewed in English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Swedish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian.
You can also select the chat show by geographic region:
North America/UK/Australia
Western Europe
Central Eastern Europe
Central/South America
Asia
Africa
The live cams also have a calendar, where they list the time and date of special chat events: WildOnCam, Squirtamania, ErotiqueTV.
The calendar only lists 3 or 4 days of upcoming days' events.
Although I believe the videos at 18 Flesh are professionally shot, with good lighting, framing, color and sound control, and ok-looking models, the videos are just hardcore sex with little eroticism or flavor. I quickly found them boring.
I enjoy the videos at Teen Mega World much better: I think the models are more attractive, and the girls put on a better show.
And the videos at Wow Girls and Wow Porn are at a higher level, because of how fucking attractive the models can be: and the technical factors (lighting, color, sound, framing) are excellent.
I'm giving 18 Flesh a score of 76.
Because in addition to 18 Flesh, you get access to a number of other sites in the network.
And if you are into cams, the cam shows might be interesting.
Except I can't evaluate the cam shows, because I have no interest in them.
What I do find interesting about the cam shows is that there is apparently a large number of shows for gay clients.
If you don't require girls that are very attractive, that put on a good show of enjoying a sexual experience, if you only require a guy plugging a girl's mouth, pussy and ass, then you could score the site higher. I want to watch attractive girls, and I hope that they will put on a show that convinces me they are enjoying themselves, so I'm willing to pay more for an upgraded experience.
No problem.
I was trying to show some of the differences between the Rocco Siffredi channel and the Rocco Siffredi site.
But whether a person finds the review useful, interesting, or readable, depends on the person.
Different strokes for different folks, as they used to say back in the 1970s.
You can easily find reviews that say some movie is wonderful, while a different review says it's a piece of crap.
I'm going for the idea that reviews can vary widely.
And still be useful.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I am writing the review based on the Adult Time channel for Rocco Siffredi.
But I am also including some details on the original Rocco Siffredi site, and other sites that have channels in the Adult Time network.
-If you join Adult Time, the Rocco Siffredi channel is included, along with over 100 additional channels of porn covering a wide variety of niches.
-If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get access to the Adult Time network.
If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get direct access to over 20 porn sites, in addition to the Adult Time channels.
(I was a member of Devils Film directly in 2019, which gave me access to a large number of porn sites directly. Almost all of the porn sites are now included as channels in the Adult Time network: however, when a porn site is included as a channed in the Adult Time network, there are often differences between the Adult Time channel and the original site it's based on:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-the number of videos in the Adult Time channel are often far less than the the video count at the original site.
-The photo sets at the Adult Time channel have fewer photos than the original photo sets at the original site.
-The search engine at Adult Time returns the content for a model from the entire Adult Time network.
The search engine, at the original site returns content for a model from the site network, which is both positive and negative: it limits the content returned to the site network, so it's easier to search for the model's content at the network, filtering out much of the Adult Time network.
I don't believe you can limit the search in an Adult Time network to a single channel: Instead, a search in the Adult Time network returns all the model's content at Adult Time.
-The Rocco Siffredi channel has 2142 videos, which is a huge number of videos.
Rocco featured A-list female porn stars for many years.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join pag
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-When you join many of the sites in the Gamma Entertainment network, you also gain access to the Adult Time network. However, not all sites in the Gamma Entertainment network clearly specify whether you will get complete access to the Adult Time network. That is a major negative, because I believe that access to the Adult Time network is the crown jewel of most memberships to a Gamma Entertainment site.
-As previously noted, the search engine for Adult Time returns content from the entire Adult Time network. You can't filter the search to include only the results from a single channel.
-Also, the search engine at the Adult Time network is flawed, because it only shows a part of the model's content, instead of clearly showing her entire content listed over several pages.
-The photo sets at Rocco Siffredi channel are limited edition versions of the original photo sets.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Rocco started in porn in the 1980s, and he is still performing in porn today.
Rocco is called the Italian Stallion, because of his cult-like fame as one of the most recognizable male porn stars ever.
-Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the Adult Time network: they feel it offers a degraded version of the porn sites that are cloned into channels of the Adult Time network.
I feel that the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today, based on the following:
-A huge backlog of high quality porn-high quality based on the technical factors of a porn video.
-A wide variety of porn genres and niches.
-Easy search for a model's content the Adult Time network.
-A low membership price. Especially if you join during one of the holiday special price discounts.
I'm giving the Rocco Siffredi channel a score of 93.
That's because you get access not only to the Rocco Siffredi channel, but also get access to the excellent Adult Time network, which has over 100 channels covering a wide variety of niches, and a huge backlog of high quality hardcore porn videos and photo sets.
Because of the huge amount of content at the Rocco Siffredi channel, and also the huge amount of content at the Adult Time network, searching through the channel and network can take a lot of time and effort to find what you're looking for. That is both good and bad. But there is so much quality hardcore porn, that the search is worth the effort, and the network is a definite bargain.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The models range from pretty to lovely. Mainly slim bodies, white, late teens to early twenties.
-The quality of the videos and photo sets is high class. Excellent lighting, focus, sound control.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Choice of definition for downloading and streaming, from 480p through 4K.
-You can steam or download the entire video, or select the parts you want to play or download.
-Most videos have an accompanying photo set, which can be downloaded in 1000px, 2000px, and 4000px.
-Navigation is basic but simple. You can search by Updates, Films, Galleries, Models.
Cons:
-I believe the cons are minor. This is one of the better sites for quality teen porn.
The reasons are shown in the pro section above: the lovely teen models, the technical quality of the videos and photo sets.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-The customer support can be poor. They require you to use a ticketing system, and you don't always get a response to your requests. That is the Ultra Film support system, which is called onetouchservice. The Vendo support is much better.
Bottom Line:
If you like the Wow Girls and Wow Porn or All Fine Girls sites, you should like the Ultra Films site as well.
They use the same models, the same style of porn, which could be called glamcore, in that the content is more or less spontaneous sex. The sex is either solo masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, or threesomes or more between girls, girls with a guy, girls with two guys.
Not a lot of romance or plot, just some kissing or fondling before they get down to the blowjobs and vaginal and anal intercourse or fingering and licking etc.
I believe the site was started around 2017-06, when Ultra 4K videos were becoming popular on porn sites. Which is why they called the site Ultra Films, because the site features videos with definitions up to 4K.
(Teen Mega World also started a site in 2015 called Beauty 4K which featured videos up to 4K definition. But for years, all the new videos at all the sites at Teen Mega World go up to 4K definition, so it's not the newest fad any more.)
Having said that 4K is no longer the newest fad, some PU members really seem to enjoy the 4K experience.
I don't have the equipment to enjoy or appreciate the 4K experience. Maybe it's my age (I'm over 70), or my eyesight, or the lack of high end equipment, but I can't tell or appreciate the increased value of videos that are above 720p.
And if I download content (video or photo sets), the lower definition content takes far less storage space than the higher definition content.
If I download a 4000px, 2000px and 1000px photo set of the same photo set, and watch the photos in a slide show with Windows Photo Viewer (a photo viewer software that comes with Windows 10 on some editions), I can't tell the difference visually between the different definition photos.
However, if I use IrfanView software (another photo viewer software that is free), and expand a single photo, I can tell the difference in the definition of a single photo.
But that is not the way I view these photos. I usually use a slide show player to view them.
Or, I can stop the slide show, to view a single photo, but I don't usually expand the photo the examine it in blow-up mode.
So, for me, downloading high definition videos and photos is mainly a waste of storage space.
And 4K videos use up a lot of storage space fast.
That's me.
There seem to be enough PU members that appreciate 4K content that it's a significant factor in their enjoyment of a porn site.
And the same for Virtual Reality sites. There are PU members who enjoy and subscribe to Virtual Reality porn sites.
I don't have virtual reality equipment. So virtual reality sites don't interest me very much.
Although the sites can also be viewed without virtual reality equipment.
But mainly virtual reality porn is best skipped over if you don't have virtual reality equipment.
Bottom line:
The Ultra Films site is a quality offering from the people who run the Wow Girls\Wow Porn sites.
You have the same lovely teen models, the same type of porn: spontaneous sex between young teens,
filmed in clear, crisp images with solid colors, and excellent technical factors.
How can they improve the site:
If you join any one of the three sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), you get immediate access to all 3 sites.
Ultra Films is a separate site.
If they added Ultra Films to the other 3 sites in a single membership, that would more content added for the same price.
That would be great for the porn customer.
But not so great for the porn producer, who is trying to increase revenues, by offering sites with different memberships.
The newest offering from these people is LustWeek.com.
Which uses the same models seen at the other sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, Ultra Films) I've mentioned, in the same high quality porn.
The LustWeek site focuses on a new model each week. And these models can be fucking lovely.
I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 93.
It's definitely worth checking out, if you are a fan of All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn.
However, joining all of these worthwhile sites can get to be very expensive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies.
An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content.
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site.
-The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip".
-A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100.
-Excellent search engine.
Cons:
-The tags describing a clip can be misleading:
A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them.
Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts.
-The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience.
An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips.
-The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition.
Bottom Line:
The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity.
The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up.
As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function.
But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content.
If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites.
Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value.
Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice.
Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity.
There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site:
"I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido".
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job.
I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact.
As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing.
Excellent comment.
Nice details. Very readable with some humor thrown in.
You could have submitted it as a review,and gotten one or more tickets for the raffle.
Nice to know you're not as greedy as some of us.
LOL.
When I joined Ultra Films, I believe the biller was Vendo.
Their customer support telephone number is supposed to be 24/7. 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.
Customer Support 18777773758
Call them, and see if they can solve your login problem.
You should find the confirmation email that you received on joining, with your login details and any other information they will need, to prove you are a member of the site.
I haven't contacted the Ultra Films support directly.
But when I used the same ticketing method for Wow Girls (run by the same company), they didn't bother to reply to my question.
That's really funny.
I guess you are the younger generation.
The one with better eyesight than I have.
Using a phone to look at the PU site.
Or to look at porn.
I've never done either.
The screen is too small for me to read the letters.
Or to view videos (or even photos) on a tiny cell phone screen.
Good to see different opinions from people.
But for me, I like a low-cost access to lots of quality porn.
I'm not into 4K porn, don't have the equipment to enjoy it.
So I think Adult Time is a great bargain:
A low price to sample and enjoy a huge quantity of what I feel is quality porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos
-easy to cancel or modify your subscription
-Content is erotic glamour photos and videos. Basically softcore. Mainly solo models, but some sets with masturbation and toys and girl/girl scenes.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Easy navigation. This is basically a small site, you have photo sets and videos of different models.
You can search for a model's content, but other than that, the search seems pretty useless.
-You can tag your favorite photo sets, videos and models for easy access.
-There is little to no advertising for other sites on the member pages, which is a rarity.
-There is no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Low annual price is $45/year recurring. The other memberships don't make a lot of sense, because they price a monthly membership or other membership options way too high.
-Members can vote to like or dis-like the photo sets and videos, and post comments on the photo sets and videos.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Negative comments are allowed, and not deleted. Unlike some sites, which remove negative comments by members almost immediately.
-Files download with the default title of the set or video plus the name of the model.
-The watermark for the site is small and placed at the bottom right corner of the photo, so it's basically out of the way.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor.
-To log in, you have to check a box to prove you are not a robot (this is a simple captcha, that is easy to check).
-The site is basically softcore glamour. With the emphasis on solo models. If you want hardcore eroticism, this site is not for you.
-There is a news section, but it's barely used. He was trying to upgrade the content, add a personal touch to the site. But aside from a few photos of some models, and a few replies by members, this section could be deleted.
What it shows is that Tony Murano does not visit the site very often.
Bottom Line:
Number of photo sets: 656
Number of videos: 75
Most of the site content is exclusive.
There is at least one photo set that was previously posted at MetArt years ago.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in 360p, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed or downloaded 360, 540p, HD, Full Hd.
The photo sets can also be streamed and/or downloaded in Ultra HD, as well.
I rated the site with a 90 on my review that I posted on 2018-05-13.
The main factors for the high score, and recommendation, were:
-I enjoy the work of Tony Murano, the contributing photographer.
He has an eye for attractive models. The models are in their late teens or early twenties.
The site is basically softcore nude glamour.
There are videos, but most of the content is photo sets.
This is not a mega site like MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy. It's the work of one photographer.
But it has 656 photo sets of attractive models, 75 videos.
The annual price is $45, which seems like a bargain.
The low price, combined with the quality of the softcore glamour sets, gives the site a score of 90.
That's my opinion.
TBP rated this site a score of 78 in 2017-08-04.
I can only assume the reviewer was not as impressed with the quality of the photo sets as I am.
The site did a recent update for the public preview, where they made the public preview page more attractive.
But they also updated a new pricing schedule, that makes the membership price much higher, except for the 1-year recurring membership at $45, which is a drop from the $50/year former price.
The prices for the other membership terms are way out of line: they price a non-recurring membership for 1 month at $30, or a non-recurring membership for 1 year at $75, when you can join for $45/year recurring.
And unless you are a complete newbie, you will realize you can join any recurring membership, to get a lower rate, and then cancel as soon as you want, if you don't want to get rebilled.
Whoever decided on the new membership pricing plans made a serious mistake: he has probably turned away a lot of potential members who might have sampled the site at a lower monthly rate.
Which is a shame, because these sites need members to support the site financially.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
