Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I wish I tried before I did (3 weeks ago). Softcore, glamour, realistic masturbation and the models are gorgeous and various adjectives based on their personality (cute, sexy, seductive, pretty, etc).
The videos have 4K on the newer videos and there are multiple download resolutions available.
The pictures will turn you into a picture fan. Besides the large amount and an obvious preference towards releasing picture sets (around 4 times as many photo sets as videos), the resolution of the pictures is the highest I have seen.
The models are so diverse on this site. The different races, ethnic groups, the personalities, it’s my experience that sites like this have slender, white models (like me). On this site, the models present a mix of everything.
I liked the small preview I saw on other sites enough that I just joined the year membership. It helps that there are nearly daily updates and so much back catalog to go through.
My new favorite site of all genres.
Cons:
Someone please fix the neverending scrolling page or at least offer a desktop version of the site. I lose my place when going through the older scenes. Before I can get back to where I was at, I see another model I want to check out, then forget where I was at.
This is a good con to have. The pictures are so big, I can tell you if the models shave their pubic hair or wax. It could be a con for some people. These pictures give a very personal, up close and personal view of these models in full nudity.
Bottom Line:
I considered this site at least 10 times. I kept getting it confused with one of the similar sites. I also had been trying to evolve my porn interests beyond softcore. That experiment is only going okay. Seeing the more graphic porn had pushed me away a little from the softcore sites I first joined like Nubiles. Forget bisexuality, porn has bipolarity. The models are either teasing too much or they’re taking way too much. The middle ground seems to be clouded with boring sex that looks like sex I had the last time I had sex. They’re getting paid to go through the motions?
I guess I signed up for their emails. I received a year offer back around New Years. It was what I viewed as a very good price. I looked up some previews and decided to give it a year membership try. I meant to join it 2-3 years ago. I’m making up for lost time with the year membership. My first impression was a little negative. I do not like the constant scrolling sites. They do offer tabs that help. There are tabs for Models, Galleries, Films and Stories. As an erotica author in my spare time. I thought the stories would be erotica stories. Those look more like extra pictures, more personal pictures. One shows pictures of a model eating and she has her bra half off. It shows more of the models’ personality.
The tabs allowed me to focus more on the content. The constant scrolling is still there, but it’s not as bad when you can split everything up. I have tried counting the photo sets and videos. The scrolling page just is not very friendly to counting. I do know they have updated around 6 times per week since early January. There’s close to 3,000 photo sets. The videos are closer to 600. The videos try not to be a focus, similar to Met Art, but the videos are really good – unlike Met Art. Everything about this site impresses me except that scrolling part. The blend of races and ethnicity. There are pale, redheaded gingers like me. There are darker toned exotic looking women from Asia and maybe South America. I want to say, this is the porn I was looking for 3 years ago! I think it’s one of the few sites I knew about but hadn’t joined.
The photos are varied in setting. That is what I am basing my thoughts on of where these models are from. There are lush, almost jungle-looking areas. I don’t think you need the videos with this porn. The models are very capable of expressing their feelings and emotions in the pictures. I believe that is something we lose in videos. That’s when they have to act. You don’t even see that on the videos from this site. The videos are very natural. The models look like maybe being fully nude and spreading in photos wasn’t quite enough for them. They want to see how they look on video, in action, using those bodyparts. The videos have at least some touching up to orgasmic masturbation. I don’t know the logic behind it. I could maybe think about the mental side of it. This is what these scenes remind me of: The models look like someone said to them, “Be yourself, you’re very pretty, you have a great body, express that to my camera.” And they do. There is no feeling of “you have to take 16 dicks in the next 13 minutes, oh yeah, look sexy if you can.” Try this site out and see if you don’t notice the difference. There is a more personal feeling to the content. Like the model is making love to the camera. I’m not really old enough, maybe I should say, I didn’t have access to porn during the pre-internet days. Maybe I missed the memo that said porn should be sexy and it should show how horny women are.
That answers all the world’s problems! We need these young, gorgeous women to show how horny they are. We probably wouldn’t have near as many of the gender problems we have.
The site is easily my new favorite. I am sure it could become repetitive, thanks mostly to that scrolling problem. I don’t believe the content will be repetitive. We are seeing a different personality from each model on this site. I hated the old interviews on porn sites. They all had the same questions, “What age did you lose your virginity?” Ask her what she likes to do to attract a man or woman. This site and this content show the young woman answering that question. Best site I have ever been a member of. I am looking into the lifetime deal. I don’t even need to say it’s recommended.
I have noticed the 5th or 6th row down in updates takes longer to load and are usually blank for a few seconds, but it's not too bad. I don't know if it matters but I have a higher end laptop (I bought from a gamer) and I only use it for porn and Adobe projects.
I can tell you there is no notice on the signup page. Also, there are updates showing up with current dates on them and even updates that are coming up, 2 days, a week, two weeks, etc.
On the other side of it, I have long said whether a site is updating isn't a dealbreaker for me. I still prefer 720p videos and I don't download or consume enough porn to ever know if the scenes are really new or not. I do try and pay attention in my reviews because I know it matters to some fans. With that said, if they're showing updates in the members area 14 hours ago (as I'm typing this), two from one week ago and have upcoming updates shown for the next 3 weeks, why would I question it or not say it's updating? My way of looking at this is you have a forum post from 2 years ago, I have a new update just posted today. Either way, it doesn't change my score or feeling about the site.
I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
Going directly to the site shows no dates, but the first one posted is Redhead in the Forest. I want to say that might be newer. The same male and female have a re-creation of Lil' Red Riding Hood where the guy is dressed up like the big, bad wolf. That scene was released as a "bonus" scene recently. The Redhead in the Forest looks like after they took their costumes off. The next listed one is Kendra Fucked at a Sex Party, which doesn't look like outside, they are on a bed. The one before it was Jesse Storm Fucked on the Patio and the one before it was Highway to Fuck.
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
