| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Barbie Cummings
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge black dicks, most described as more than a foot long
Barbie is cute and very playful |
| Cons: |
Too expensive and PU does not have a discount
TBP had a review in 2014 that showed 27 video. It still does. Not updating
The best quality is Standard Definition. The site is probably from before 2010.
Only visually boring internal cumshots
The scene descriptions are uncomfortably borderline racist. Definitely stereotypical.
No interactons with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. |
| Bottom Line: |
The preview says she is he queen of the black guy creampie. The site says it has 30 videos, there are 27, and is adding updates regularly and it is a dead site. Unfortunately when looking at the low quality content, all you see is in Standard Definition. By my guess, that would mean this was actively updating before 2010. The video count is far too few and it says they were all added in 2021.
So who is Barb Cummings? She is an attractive thin blond American model who was on several sites before getting one just for herself. Here, she comes across well and has a hot personality. The premise is that her father taught her to hate black men. Out of pure spite, she wants to go in the complete opposite direction and have a black baby. Did I leave out that her goal is to show her getting pregnant on camera? In many scene descriptions she says she is disappointed with yet another pregnancy test. So on to another two or three black men to try again. She describes her partners in very stereotypical ways. In many cases the reason she is with so many guys at once is that they would not do the scene if they had to pay child support. Many possible fathers, no 18 year monetary commitment. In two scenes she has pornstar Gia Paloma help her.
With pregnancy a goal, she has managed to find a way to do scenes that have a unique theme for porn. However, as a woman, I want to see cum shots. These are all internals. In a few scenes you see the cum dripping out, but that does nothing for me. It does zero to get her pregnant either. On the other hand the black guys are really dark and huge. She describes them as footlongs and even more. I don’t think that is literally accurate, but they do look really large.
The downloads were fast, the site uses tags for searching and you also get a photoset for each video. There are no interactions with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. The site is what you see and you should never expect any updates or other changes.
I could not resist and I cheated and looked her up online. Years ago she was pulled over for speeding and gave the trooper a blow job to get out of it. She recorded it all, posted it online and he lost his job. She was married from before this site was active and had a white baby with her white husband. It was just a way to get noticed. If you find her fantasy to be hot you can try out this site. |
|
10-19-21 12:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
177
|
True Anal
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready |
| Cons: |
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
I didn't like much about this site. |
|
08-10-21 03:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
178
|
Abby Winters
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite site for the last 7 years
There is solo, lesbian and male/female sex
The models are either amateurs or I don’t know them
You get unlimited downloads of pictures and videos
Beautiful real women of different races, hair colors and body shapes
Navigation is great, but I have been a member off and on for 7 years
Quality of videos, pictures, production are all very high
The videos are long in a good way |
| Cons: |
The only con I can think of and it’s just for the in-general potential member – the price is more than the average site at $39.95 per month |
| Bottom Line: |
Abby Winters is a site that exemplifies a top porn site! It has the best realism in porn – for my money. The models are of all types. You will see slim, medium, slightly more than medium women. The hair colors are all over the rainbow. Tattoos aren’t common for the women, but more common for their boyfriends. Their hardcore scenes are mostly of a female model with her real-life boyfriend. The sex is passionate, sometimes dirty, especially the lesbian scenes and you aren’t likely to see anything that makes you feel like it’s faked or scripted.
When I first joined Abby Winters back in 2009, I remember it mostly or even exclusively being women. I joined it every year from 2009 to 2018, but in 2018, I started joining it more and it became my favorite site. The girls with their boyfriends series is, in my opinion, the best hardcore male/female porn available . It’s mostly just straightforward sex between the male and female, but there are some kinkier scenes. The girl/girl scenes are and have been my favorite scenes on the site. It’s not always about jump into a 69 or start tribbing furiously. Some of the girl/girl scenes are of two women sitting beside each other on a couch and masturbating. I’m still convinced that is how straight women find themselves in an unexpected bisexual situation, or how bi-curiosity starts. I’m convinced their scenes are not scripted. Maybe the first second is scripted. You know, like – the two women sit on the couch beside each other, both with intentions of masturbating, but that’s where I believe the scripting stops. The Girls with their Boyfriends series doesn’t need to be debated whether it’s scripted. I am sure the producer just tells them to have sex like they normally would. The solo scenes are very good, too.
Quality is an easy pro on Abby Winters. The videos, especially newer ones are available in 4K downloads. Most of the videos are at least offered in 720p and 1080p. You can download the pictures, which are equally as impressive as the videos, in zip files. There are no download limits if you subscribe. There are a couple updates every week. The site is huge with a combined close to 12,000 videos and picture sets. The videos are higher in number, too.
The pricing is the only con I listed and I only listed it because I know others might balk at that price. You can buy individual scenes if you want, but the subscription is the way to go for me. I can’t imagine only wanting 1 or 2 scenes. If the price is the only thing stopping from joining, there are promos that reduce the price.
Realism in porn is only so-so important to me. That is because I have an active imagination. Seeing these scenes that are undeniably real, it just makes it easier for me to enjoy. I have to use my imagination with most porn and it’s Abby Winters videos that show me I’m probably not enjoying other porn sites as much as I think – or imagined.
This site is based in Australia and outside of a couple sites, I don’t think there are but a few Australian porn sites. That helps the models seem like all amateurs or they really are all amateurs. Several of the models look familiar, but I can’t say for sure why.
This is the best site for me. Anytime my subscription runs out, I take a month or so to join other sites, and even without an active membership, I still find myself clicking on my Abby Winters bookmark, more times than not, rejoining it as soon as I do.
I can’t recommend any other site over it. |
|
05-22-25 08:15pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
179
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it..
In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have.
There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download.
There are 1,217 models.
The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K.
It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles
The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed. |
| Cons: |
I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed.
It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling. |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre.
The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion.
There are roughly 5-6 updates per week.
During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has
Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one.
Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t.
The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel!
I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision?
In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable.
A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site. |
|
02-13-24 09:57pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
180
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I wish I tried before I did (3 weeks ago). Softcore, glamour, realistic masturbation and the models are gorgeous and various adjectives based on their personality (cute, sexy, seductive, pretty, etc).
The videos have 4K on the newer videos and there are multiple download resolutions available.
The pictures will turn you into a picture fan. Besides the large amount and an obvious preference towards releasing picture sets (around 4 times as many photo sets as videos), the resolution of the pictures is the highest I have seen.
The models are so diverse on this site. The different races, ethnic groups, the personalities, it’s my experience that sites like this have slender, white models (like me). On this site, the models present a mix of everything.
I liked the small preview I saw on other sites enough that I just joined the year membership. It helps that there are nearly daily updates and so much back catalog to go through.
My new favorite site of all genres. |
| Cons: |
Someone please fix the neverending scrolling page or at least offer a desktop version of the site. I lose my place when going through the older scenes. Before I can get back to where I was at, I see another model I want to check out, then forget where I was at.
This is a good con to have. The pictures are so big, I can tell you if the models shave their pubic hair or wax. It could be a con for some people. These pictures give a very personal, up close and personal view of these models in full nudity. |
| Bottom Line: |
I considered this site at least 10 times. I kept getting it confused with one of the similar sites. I also had been trying to evolve my porn interests beyond softcore. That experiment is only going okay. Seeing the more graphic porn had pushed me away a little from the softcore sites I first joined like Nubiles. Forget bisexuality, porn has bipolarity. The models are either teasing too much or they’re taking way too much. The middle ground seems to be clouded with boring sex that looks like sex I had the last time I had sex. They’re getting paid to go through the motions?
I guess I signed up for their emails. I received a year offer back around New Years. It was what I viewed as a very good price. I looked up some previews and decided to give it a year membership try. I meant to join it 2-3 years ago. I’m making up for lost time with the year membership. My first impression was a little negative. I do not like the constant scrolling sites. They do offer tabs that help. There are tabs for Models, Galleries, Films and Stories. As an erotica author in my spare time. I thought the stories would be erotica stories. Those look more like extra pictures, more personal pictures. One shows pictures of a model eating and she has her bra half off. It shows more of the models’ personality.
The tabs allowed me to focus more on the content. The constant scrolling is still there, but it’s not as bad when you can split everything up. I have tried counting the photo sets and videos. The scrolling page just is not very friendly to counting. I do know they have updated around 6 times per week since early January. There’s close to 3,000 photo sets. The videos are closer to 600. The videos try not to be a focus, similar to Met Art, but the videos are really good – unlike Met Art. Everything about this site impresses me except that scrolling part. The blend of races and ethnicity. There are pale, redheaded gingers like me. There are darker toned exotic looking women from Asia and maybe South America. I want to say, this is the porn I was looking for 3 years ago! I think it’s one of the few sites I knew about but hadn’t joined.
The photos are varied in setting. That is what I am basing my thoughts on of where these models are from. There are lush, almost jungle-looking areas. I don’t think you need the videos with this porn. The models are very capable of expressing their feelings and emotions in the pictures. I believe that is something we lose in videos. That’s when they have to act. You don’t even see that on the videos from this site. The videos are very natural. The models look like maybe being fully nude and spreading in photos wasn’t quite enough for them. They want to see how they look on video, in action, using those bodyparts. The videos have at least some touching up to orgasmic masturbation. I don’t know the logic behind it. I could maybe think about the mental side of it. This is what these scenes remind me of: The models look like someone said to them, “Be yourself, you’re very pretty, you have a great body, express that to my camera.” And they do. There is no feeling of “you have to take 16 dicks in the next 13 minutes, oh yeah, look sexy if you can.” Try this site out and see if you don’t notice the difference. There is a more personal feeling to the content. Like the model is making love to the camera. I’m not really old enough, maybe I should say, I didn’t have access to porn during the pre-internet days. Maybe I missed the memo that said porn should be sexy and it should show how horny women are.
That answers all the world’s problems! We need these young, gorgeous women to show how horny they are. We probably wouldn’t have near as many of the gender problems we have.
The site is easily my new favorite. I am sure it could become repetitive, thanks mostly to that scrolling problem. I don’t believe the content will be repetitive. We are seeing a different personality from each model on this site. I hated the old interviews on porn sites. They all had the same questions, “What age did you lose your virginity?” Ask her what she likes to do to attract a man or woman. This site and this content show the young woman answering that question. Best site I have ever been a member of. I am looking into the lifetime deal. I don’t even need to say it’s recommended. |
|
02-09-22 07:04am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
181
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Reply
I wouldn't pay $49.95 for it. I had an email promotion that offered it cheap for a year and joined it that way.
|
05-27-25 06:20pm
|
Reply
182
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I have noticed the 5th or 6th row down in updates takes longer to load and are usually blank for a few seconds, but it's not too bad. I don't know if it matters but I have a higher end laptop (I bought from a gamer) and I only use it for porn and Adobe projects.
|
05-27-25 06:17pm
|
Reply
183
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Reply
I can tell you there is no notice on the signup page. Also, there are updates showing up with current dates on them and even updates that are coming up, 2 days, a week, two weeks, etc.
On the other side of it, I have long said whether a site is updating isn't a dealbreaker for me. I still prefer 720p videos and I don't download or consume enough porn to ever know if the scenes are really new or not. I do try and pay attention in my reviews because I know it matters to some fans. With that said, if they're showing updates in the members area 14 hours ago (as I'm typing this), two from one week ago and have upcoming updates shown for the next 3 weeks, why would I question it or not say it's updating? My way of looking at this is you have a forum post from 2 years ago, I have a new update just posted today. Either way, it doesn't change my score or feeling about the site.
|
05-27-25 06:13pm
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
|
03-10-21 01:51am
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
|
04-28-20 09:13pm
|
Reply
186
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Reply
187
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
188
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
189
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm naive?
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
|
04-26-20 07:46am
|
Reply
190
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
|
12-09-19 06:39am
|
Reply
191
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
|
12-09-19 05:27am
|
Reply
192
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Going directly to the site shows no dates, but the first one posted is Redhead in the Forest. I want to say that might be newer. The same male and female have a re-creation of Lil' Red Riding Hood where the guy is dressed up like the big, bad wolf. That scene was released as a "bonus" scene recently. The Redhead in the Forest looks like after they took their costumes off. The next listed one is Kendra Fucked at a Sex Party, which doesn't look like outside, they are on a bed. The one before it was Jesse Storm Fucked on the Patio and the one before it was Highway to Fuck.
|
10-29-19 03:32pm
|
Reply
193
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
|
07-10-19 08:51pm
|
Reply
194
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I just noticed a lot of typos in my previous reply, but the site says I can no longer edit it.
|
07-02-19 10:04pm
|
Reply
195
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
|
07-02-19 07:38pm
|
Reply
196
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
|
07-02-19 07:18pm
|
Reply
197
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thank you, I used several PU veterans reviews as a guideline for my review, including yours.
|
06-10-19 11:13am
|
Reply
198
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
StrokeOff's Reply
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
|
06-10-19 11:11am
|
Reply
199
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Shen's Reply
Thank you, I hope to have more reviews over the next few weeks.
|
06-10-19 11:07am
|
Reply
200
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you! I was surprised when I received the email with the gift card in it.
|
06-10-19 11:05am
|
|
