| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians
Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines
Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each
It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site
The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre
Downloadable videos are up to 4K |
| Cons: |
In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has
Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman.
Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!”
Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable.
That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey.
Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single.
As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded.
It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. |
|
07-09-23 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of porn’s most marketed stars … Joanna Angel
Alternative, goth, tatted, all apply to nearly every scene on Joana’s sites
There are 237 videos to download
Site’s navigation is straightforward and simple
Very hardcore in some of the scenes
Some of the videos even have 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no picture zip downloads
Joanna isn’t in every scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I first was introduced to Joanna Angel’s content on the Gamma-owned Burning Angel. There are lots of reasons for me to like her. She’s about the same size I am. She hasn’t succumbed to plastic surgery. She’s around 40 and she’s never wanted to fit in. I don’t know if her success in porn shows popularity or she’s just that good of a performer. She is one of the most prolific female porn stars as well.
This site is very much a solo site about Joanna, but there are friends or guests too. The sex varies from heavy tease (my favorite) to all out hardcore sex (my least favorite). Joanna, despite her tiny frame, shows the strength and power of a confident woman. She does it without having to rely on stories and plots to show her strength.
The videos are mostly downloadable in 1080p and 720p, but there are some that can be downloaded in 4K.
There are picture sets, but those are not downloadable. The site is a back to the basics type site. There are four filters to separate the content. You have scenes, pornstars, tags and shop.
That is even simpler for me. I’m not interested in the friends or other pornstars. The tags aren’t helpful to me and I don’t think I’m interested in anything from the shop.
Joanna shows off some of her skills including tease and denial of a guy, not for sure if that’s her husband (he’s a pornstar) or not. The scenes with Joanna have near perfect chemistry and good tension. I had the same feeling with Burning Angel scenes as scenes from this solo site. If Joanna isn’t in the scene, I’m not interested in it.
There are no bonuses or extra content. You just get Joanna’s site and nothing else. I’m okay with that, but I think I’ve shown I’m a huge fan of Joanna.
She is considered one of the most important models of alt porn and is considered one of the pioneers of the genre. All while looking 25-30, when she’s really 40+. I take every scene she is in as her chance to impress the viewer. I don’t think she’s let anyone down very much. This site is required for those that are Joanna Angel fans. I would even say it’s better than Burning Angel, if you’re just in it for the Joanna content. |
|
06-11-23 03:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Alt Erotic
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been in an alternative mood lately and have to say, this may be one of the most underrated sites on the internet.
Very large site considering it’s a newer site. They have almost 500 videos and 500 photo sets.
1080p downloads for all videos.
Picture sets can be downloaded in high-resolution zip files
Gives new meaning to screwed, blued and tattooed.
No download limits and it’s 100% exclusive |
| Cons: |
As a fan of tattooed porn, I have said it before and continue to – do tattooed people never have regular sex or play sex games? It’s all hardcore at 120 MPH.
Missing a few pro favorites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Alt Erotica continues my alternative porn journey that included the great solo site of Joanna Angel. Burning Angel is likely the best known alternative porn site. Alt Erotica takes different spins at alt porn. There are the reality based scenes of a young woman going to get tattooed in a parlor, only to end up having sex with the tattooist, his friend and a cameraman or two. Sarcasm drips as I say the sacred sanctity of the tattoo parlor.
Am I the only one that has always wondered if sex happens in a tattoo parlor? I’m just wondering since this is the first site I’ve seen use the idea. The scenarios are believable at least to me they are. There’s a focus on women getting nude and opening their legs in front of strangers (tattooists). It’s good, I like it and it’s very believable.
The site as a whole is great. They have high quality downloads. No download limits, good navigation and it’s creative. The picture sets are good and are well-edited. You could look through a picture set and explain what’s going to happen in the video. It just feels like this site is ran by experienced professionals. No download limits, no gimmicky pricing, all exclusive content and other than a few exceptions – they have every hot and sexy tattooed model in porn on this site.
I don’t think I will ever know why all tattooed pornstars can only operate in fast, hardcore sex, but maybe it’s best that I don’t know. The biller continues to show the professionalism as they have billing by Epoch. They do send me emails every few months and offer a promo. They also offer a yearly promo around the holidays. I could see someone joining this as their primary or favorite site. It’s that unique and has quality in everything they do.
I think Alt Erotica is neck and neck with Burning Angel for the top tattooed hardcore site. I also believe Alt Erotica has better stories and premises than Burning Angel. It’s one of my favorite sites and if you’re remotely interested in tattooed models, it will probably be one of your favorites too. |
|
06-11-23 03:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy |
| Cons: |
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
An easy 95 that could easily move up to 100. |
|
05-10-23 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As technically impressive transsexual site as you will ever find.
Unlimited video downloads and photoset downloads.
The videos have offered 4K downloads for nearly 6 years.
Even though the older videos have a lower resolution, they’re not poor.
One of the best sites for solo transsexuals
You can register through Paypal |
| Cons: |
Grooby seems to hold the rights to a lot of transsexual sites. This creates numerous problems I noticed.
Prices are outrageous in 2023 – nearly $40 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
Grooby is undoubtedly the biggest name in transsexual porn.The main problems that come from that are: Seemingly created their own supply and demand pricing. Can separate traanssexuals into more niches (Asian, Black, etc) to require the member to join multiple high priced sites just to see the different races of models. And if you’re like me and want to join multiple sites each month, you’re going to be spending near or even over $100 for 3 Grooby sites even if they give you a discount.
Business Philosophy aside, Grooby delivers exactly what they offer. Real, very attractive transsexuals masturbating and having sex. I like to use Nubiles.net in my comparisons to sites of other genres. Grooby is 99% like Nubiles. On paper, in numbers, in technical comparisons, very few if any sites can compete with them, but the action in the videos does not live up to the high standard the presentation creates. You also are getting standard porn – even if it is transsexuals. Nothing here is pushing the boundaries or moving the transsexual genre forward.
The good news is very few porn fans really care that much about those things. The bad news is the ones who do are usually reviewers. Only Nubiles.net calls for a review this objective. I have to look at Grooby as a site that the average member has never visited before joining. Like it’s their first ever porn site membership and they (the member) is without biases. When you view ths Grooby site that way it’s easily a 95 or higher. When you add subjectivity to the review, the score drops down to the low 80s. It’s just not that entertaining to someone who has joined over 100 sites.
They have provided 4K downloads for nearly 6 years and most everything else can be downloaded in HD. There are no download limits and the photosets are probably the highest quality transsexual photos I have seen. It’s just there are some missing elements I’m used to like some level of sexual tension (good kind). Instead, I’m just loaded down with tons of content that is mostly generic.
The action is either transsexual hardcore sex or solo. There’s not much variety there. Likewise, because Grooby has so many other sites, there’s not much difference in how the models look (race).
For me, this site or several combined Grooby sites could easily approach the 100 score, but just like with Nubiles.net there’s a little something extra that is missing. I’m going with a middle ground between 100 and 85 of 93. If you’re new to the site and porn in general, I could see you scoring it 98-100. |
|
04-12-23 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site. |
|
02-08-23 06:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Joined along with their site Girl Girl
Very good hardcore site
Easy to use and navigate
4K downloads on newer videos and 1080p or 720p also
Zip downloadable photo sets
Huge site with regular updates still coming |
| Cons: |
Hardcore sites usually bore me and this one did as well.
I mainly joined this to get access to Girl Girl.
Most if not all of the models are pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was joining Girl Girl and received an offer to add Jules Jordan. Both are owned and operated by the same company. It was a good deal for the two sites.
Jules Jordan content is similar to most hardcore sites and DVDs. There are some scenes with stories and plots, but nothing groundbreaking. The site’s biggest selling point is hardcore porn that’s not too hardcore and violent. I do know this can be a pro or con depending on the person: Nearly all or all of the models are pros. The reason I consider that a con is if you’ve been a member of other hardcore sites like Evil Angel, Backed, Tushy etc, the scenes here feature most of the same models and the action isn’t much different. The flip side of that is you do have pros performing and that means good performances (for porn). Personally, I prefer amateur models, especially females, but I knew what I was getting when I joined this site so I won’t deduct any points.
Their technical side is impressive with 4K downloads on all new scenes and even the older ones have 720p and/or 1080p, Their above average quality picture sets can be downloaded in zip files. The site packs in the quantity with over 10,000 scenes on over 2,500 DVDs. The videos are high quality in technical quality and the action is above average for a hardcore site.
You may want more from your hardcore scenes. The stories and plots are limited in scope and are usually just based on the niche (anal, oral, etc). The site is easy to use considering how big it is and the navigation works well.
Besides having over 10,000 scenes they have regular updates still coming in. I would list no bonus content as a con, but with the bundle I received, Girl Girl was included and I found it to be one of the best lesbian sites I’ve ever joined. They could work on adding some variety and improving storylines, but that’s not a big deal – in my opinion – to hardcore fans, which I am not.
I will compare it directly to Evil Angel and say I prefer the Jules Jordan hardcore scenes. But Jules Jordan doesn’t offer the variety of niches Evil Angel has. It’s a recommended site for hardcore fans. Just don’t expect anything amateur or homemade. |
|
01-10-23 02:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
34
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn.
More than 20 sites included.
Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models.
The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche.
Newer videos are downloadable in 4K
Nearly daily update across the network. |
| Cons: |
When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress!
The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter.
The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too.
The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act.
Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex.
The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting.
With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. |
|
11-28-22 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Slayed
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn
Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads
Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price.
Pretty and sexy models
Scenes are fun and have good production
Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem.
The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned.
The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two.
There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle.
With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. |
|
11-06-22 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see. |
| Cons: |
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned. |
|
10-11-22 07:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes? |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some. |
| Bottom Line: |
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too. |
|
08-09-22 09:56am
Replies (1)
|
Review
44
|
Strokies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site.
Weekly update
575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks.
Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p.
Downloads are unlimited and included in membership.
Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me.
Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. |
| Bottom Line: |
Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body.
It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from.
The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important.
I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads.
The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me.
I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. |
|
07-11-22 09:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Crash Pad Series
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that fits unique and different from the mainstream.
Currently 345 scenes
Models are mostly amateur based on my knowledge of models. A few look familiar.
It’s nice to have Epoch as the biller since I wasn’t familiar with this site.
The Behind-the-Scenes videos are really interesting and have closed captioning and subtitles over the last 5 years.
A lot of variety in models which will be the first con as well. |
| Cons: |
Heavier built, tattoos, piercings, these models are more like everyday women, and I know that can be a con for some porn fans.
Overall video quality could be improved. Some of the newer scenes have 4K. A lot only have 360p. And each video only has one download option.
No dates or tags on the scenes. It’s hard to keep up with the various niches they cover without tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found a couple of sites by this company. They won some awards in the earlier part of 2005 for best dyke films. They had a Crash Pad in San Francisco that people would crash in and have sex. That’s more interesting to me than showing up at a studio to have sex for 18 minutes and 12 seconds. I was just looking for something different. I knew that likely wouldn’t turn out perfect.
It didn’t. But it turned out good enough. The main selling point here for me is the authentic sex and real people. Even real emotions. With that comes the reality of not everyone will find all of these models attractive.
The site itself could use some updates. If there are tags, I have not found them. It’s even kind of difficult to get started. I clicked through a few tabs just trying to find the scenes. I have been on a few sites like this one. There’s a learning curve that you will pick up and think it wasn’t that big of a deal once you figure it out. The search engine could be better, but I’m not for sure how. As I don’t know these models and wouldn’t know what to search for. You’re going to have to click and scan through to see if scenes or models catch your eye. I was originally concerned that there are no downloads, but there are. It’s just you only get one download option, and it can range from 360p to 4K. That fits the words needs updating. I don’t have a 4K monitor so 4K files are overkill for me. And 360p doesn’t look that good on any monitor.
Besides the need for updating, the site does a lot right including one of the broadest varieties of performers and niches I have seen. They have bi, trans, the specified “queer” content and it directed by Shine Louise Houston. That is something that could push some away as this does fall under feminist porn. I don’t consider myself a feminist even though I am a female in a male-dominated field. I’ve never really felt the need or desire to be a feminist. I do think that’s a risky word to label yourself with in a field like porn that has half a century steeped in male dominance. Some of the wording could make the site more difficult to understand. Femme, Boi, stud, it’s more than a switch to a different porn site. It’s more like you step into a whole other world.
The site has won a lot of awards and been nominated for others. I am counting 20 they have won or been nominated for. The realistic action is a big part of that. There’s no real fluff like you see in mainstream porn or the that couldn’t be further from realistic mainstream “reality porn”.
I do recognize several models especially Daisy Ducati who is one of my favorites from Kink. That is where several of the models are featured over on the Kink Network. I do wish they did a little more with the user features. Better video quality and tags would make a huge difference. I believe that a lot of sites like this one are as much aimed at mobile users as PC users. I can use either but do prefer PC. Some of the files are even named Ipad. I don’t think that’s a good plan. Why not give the better resolution that works on mobile and PC instead of the lower resolution that is hardly watchable on the PC?
I’m kind of torn on it. The quality of the action is really good. Your feelings about the attractiveness of the models will be subjective. That’s why I believe better user features would have improved everything. It's worth looking into if you’re looking for something different. If they improved the site’s features, I would be more likely to recommend it to everyone. I know how porn fans are. |
|
06-04-22 11:50pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
48
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not for sure how much exploitation is going on, but most of these amateur girls wear the guys out in the scenes.
Long, fairly well-thought, enjoyable scenes that let you get to know a little about the model and see if she can perform better than she says. A resounding yes on many of those.
Pretty young women that if nothing else fit the college girl look and even attitude.
Videos have 1080p downloads.
Easy site to use, join and cancel.
Updates 5-6 times per month. |
| Cons: |
Watching the guys try to wear these young college girls out. Sorry Sailor, that boat sunk. You just paid her to do what she does every weekend for free, and she made you look bad while doing it. I’m just having fun, there’s a con in the preconceived notion the site creates with its name. Everyone in these scenes seems to be happy and enjoying every second of the exploitation.
The person that has to change the sheets on the same bed that every scene is filmed in. Ever think of the floor, guys? Bathroom? Balcony? |
| Bottom Line: |
I had to get a little creative with the cons as this site really doesn’t do much wrong. The guys come prepared, are decent enough looking and don’t get in the way. The girls like to talk. They are playful, some are shy and all are horny. It’s how I heard college works. How about a stressed out final exam scene? The excogi shortening of the name makes me think it’s trying to get away from the exploited name and tell us all these girls were in college but dropped out. It’s the ex-college girls. There is no way these young women have time to learn anything other than sex. And taking money from guys. It’s more profitable than a college degree.
Seriously, this site is a pleasant surprise for me and it’s one of those that you do enter with preconceived notions. I was expecting scenes that lasted 22 minutes and 16 seconds. Featured throughout those scenes were the common sex positions and they switched positions every 6 minutes and 23 seconds. I’m saying I was expecting dull, cookie-cutter porn. The girls are not having that. They do not want everyone at the college saying, “She should have stayed in college. She has no career in porn!” She’s making Magna Cum Laude.
Don’t let my inner-author take over or we’ll never get to the review. The scenes do a lot. There is some interview, some teasing, some playfulness, some shyness, some what I see as competitive jostling. You can tell these young women are not going to get wore out by these “old” men. I’m sorry to the guys in the scenes, but you all look old enough to be at least their professors. You can see the societal shift in these young women, in the newer scenes. The scene length is an important factor for me. As a nearing middle-age female, I can’t just get into a scene and have business taken care of in 22 minutes. I need a little time and warming up. These scenes regularly go over one hour and even over 90 minutes for one scene.
I am glad that it’s not 112 minutes of switching positions sex. There is enjoyment in watching how the female’s mind and arousal leads her responses to questions. You can see (or I can as a female) when the young woman is trying to speed things up signaling, she’s warm and ready. I do believe the guys or interviewer could make the scenes a little more interesting by teasing her once she’s aroused and ready. The scenes have an almost “date” like feel to them. Like the guy is trying to talk the young woman into sex. We know she is going to have sex, but if the interviewer could pick up on when the young woman stops thinking about “I’m being paid to do this” and shows the side that just wants to do it whether paid or not, they could have some of the best scenes ever seen.
These young women are extremely horny, and it can be seen. If someone can push those buttons this site would be upper 90s. They come close in some scenes. It may be that I’m asking too much. I thought the Aarora and Leana Threesome was very close to a perfect scene. I doubt that others would think that just by looking at a preview.
I now face the question of how many months would it take me to watch each scene fully? That is what is needed with this content. If you’re skipping much you would probably be better off with another site. It does seem to me you have to watch the entire scene. This is the type of hardcore content porn needs. It’s not dull, it’s not cookie-cutter and everyone seems to enjoy being in it.
The videos can be downloaded up to 1080p. There are pictures, too. They have over 900 scenes and update 5-6 times a month based on the last 3 months. There have around 700 models. I am going to say the number of amateurs is very high if not all. These look like college students not porn models.
I have enjoyed the site a lot and it’s one of those rare ones that I am going back to after I canceled it and planning on staying longer this time. |
|
05-11-22 04:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s included when you join Exploited College Girls and vice-versa.
Definite amateur models and a black couch that’s in the backroom.
Models are mostly pretty and a lot of them, especially newer ones, are funny and cute. There are over 700 models.
Scenes are full featured, is that a term? Interview, tease, sex, it’s all in one scene.
Updates a little more than once per week, I’m counting around 6 per month.
Good blend of models (race, body types, kinkiness level) |
| Cons: |
It's similar to Exploited College Girls, there’s really not a lot they are doing wrong. They do have a download limit listed, but I haven’t hit it. It looks high to me with 25GB per day. I’m not a hoarding downloader. I download what I know I can watch.
Shouldn’t it be repetitive if the women are amateurs and new to the porn field? There seems to be a line you can’t cross with newbies to porn modeling. I think the viewer accepts that to get to see new, fresh models. |
| Bottom Line: |
These two sites – Backroom Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls are a real find for me. I seem to only want to stay in my comfort zone of mostly glam, softer content and it’s not for lack of trying. I have tried many hardcore sites and wished I hadn’t. These sites walk that fine line between, “You’re trying to see how much of her innards you can pull out” and “That’s just two people have fun, passionate sex.” It may be because I’m a woman. This site does it as well as Exploited College Girls.
The models are probably a bigger deal to females than males. I know that sounds dumb since I’m not a lesbian, but it’s not just about looks. I think as a woman, I want to think young women just kind of stumble into porn. Like I did the backseat of that guy’s car in college. These scenes give me that feeling. The ladies do a good enough job of showing up in what looks like a casual outfit for a job interview. The guys are not enough asshole to make me feel like they’re really trying to exploit these young women. As I told in the Exploited College Girls review, the girls wear the guys in the newer scenes. It’s nice to see the shift happening in porn. It didn’t have to be a major shift. It could be progressive to show women can be horny too. It does make me laugh since these guys are handing money out. Maybe someone could make a porn site where they have a bet with the woman. If they can get her to have sex without pay, then she won’t ask for pay. You know the webmasters would be all for that. They’re placing personal ads for smooth-talking men. I have always believed that pay takes away from the realism in porn. Maybe everyone does have a price. That is where typical hardcore does not do well with me. I start thinking there’s no way she agreed to this. She’s just doing it to get her money. That loses me. This site and Exploited College Girls, don’t give me that feeling.
The scenes can be downloaded in HD. There are pictures. The navigation is basic and simple as it should be for a site like this. I find looking at each woman to be one of the most interesting parts. A lot of these women do not look like they have plans to be in 10,000 porn scenes. I do believe the most interesting is when you get the woman that looks like she shouldn’t be in porn, and I mean that in the way that she looks like a potential Hollywood actress. You also get the other side of that woman would probably shoot a new scene every week.
The tags work well even though I don’t use them. I just start at the beginning and pick 6-10 scenes to download and watch over a week period. I think considering they give you this site and Exploited College Girls this could be a long term join for me. If you combine the sites, they are updating 12 times a month and have over 1,500 scenes between the sites. They do give you a third site too. I haven’t checked the third site out just because of the name. It’s Black Ambush. That has the sound of every site that has turned me away from hardcore. I will eventually check it out, but for now I’m happy with Exploited College Girls and Backroom Casting Couch.
I would definitely recommend joining either and getting both to any porn fan. I did score Exploited College Girls a little higher, but you get both sites so there’s no reason to prefer one of the other when you can have both. |
|
05-11-22 04:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Looks like a site has been forgotten. Sexy, teasing, “I think” amateurs.
There are nearly 700 models and most look new to me.
Downloadable movies and picture sets.
It’s a large site with over 6,000 picture sets and videos. It updates daily.
Movies can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Good site for straight or curious women with nothing close to “offensive” happening. |
| Cons: |
This site has been around a long time. I used to think it was a stream-only site. I believe Nubiles used to advertise for it and the launch date coincides with my first time joining Nubiles in 2009. The site’s name may be the biggest con. It doesn’t sound like porn. Sounds like a video game or your weird aunt’s soup recipe.
There’s not a lot of explicit nudity. There’s plenty of nudity, it’s just not gynecological. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not going to be that critical of the content as I found it quite good. I am going to be critical of their marketing. I have heard of this site for more than 10 years, but never joined it. I don’t even think I ever looked at a preview. It’s a really good site. It reminds me of a photo site, kind of artsy, but they do stress there isn’t much makeup. They’re not going for glamour. It’s women next door and that’s not girls, because some of these females are probably in their 40s. If not, don’t say anything, so I don’t have to name which ones look 40s to me. There is a little bit of hesitancy on my part. This is a large site, but it has been around since 2009. I’m a little hesitant and dare I say – gunshy, after reviewing a site awhile back and finding out they recycled the entire site from old updates. This one has new updates everyday and that’s either really impressive or someone is slipping one over on me. An update everyday after being open for 13 years deserves some credit.
What you mostly get with this site is women dressed normally and doing normal things. I think it’s normal for young, pretty women to strip in the shower. That sounds strange. I don’t know anyone that takes showers in their clothes. A site like this, to me, appeals to straight women. Especially those of us that are nearing middle-age. Some of these women could teach a thing or two about being sexy. It’s not weighed down by she needs to get naked and masturbate or have sex. I believe when you give a woman the job of being sexy without sex, you get her best sexy show. She knows she has to make it count.
The question becomes is that porn? Good question. I think it is. A lot of the stripping is in panties, thongs, and it’s not stripping for stripping class. It’s stripping for arousing someone else or teasing. I just don’t think it adds up to the current porn we see. That doesn’t help my questioning of if the content is potentially recycled. It really fuels it. I haven’t seen porn like this since the first sites I joined around 2009-2010. I do apologize to them if I am talking too much about recycling. I hope it could help others interested in the site. That also should be mentioned, I don’t see any 4K scenes. That’s porn’s fault for trying to establish 4K as the standard. Now, anytime I don’t see 4K scenes, I start to wonder if the scenes are older and re-released.
The models are really hit or miss for me. I do believe they are going to be a major part of how you feel about this site. Some, Naomi Moon, comes to mind, are knockouts. While some, I won’t name them, look like the woman that delivered my groceries. That’s a big disparity between models. I will mention that Naomi Moon’s bio on the site definitely tells that it’s new content. She is from Ukraine and the bio says Ukraine is in news for “other” reasons. I wish someone else was a member or could explain why this site does not feel like a 2022 site. Maybe their webmaster knows? I know the more teasing nature of the content could be giving me the older feel from older sites. The styles of clothing could be from poorer countries than what I’m used to. That is what makes the site interesting to me, but I still can’t say it's the porn part that makes it interesting.
The teasing is cute, though some of these women look older than me and I would hope if they’re older than me they know better than to waste their time and years on teasing. I like Yassa Mare’s content a lot.
I believe it takes more to impress without full nudity than it does to impress with full nudity and 7 men having their way with you. I really can’t say who I would recommend this content to. Those that like normal woman? That is what I feel like I’m looking at. It makes women like Naomi Moon really stand out on the site. It’s mostly just normal, fun, women stripping and looking pretty. I don’t know who that would be recommended to. Maybe that’s why the site isn’t well-known? I will say if these normal women were willing to do masturbation, I think it would be a real winner site. They look more like the women that buy the 5 inch dildo AND lube. Innocence is not age-related, it’s experience-related.
I think I’ve talked myself into understanding what’s going on with this site. It’s like it has never progressed and they’re just doing what they’ve always done. I would really consider trying to progress this some. You have women in wet shirts looking at the camera like, “My shirt is wet!” Guys in 2022 would say, “Did you spill your drink?” The nipples showing would just go over their head. You have to be more blunt ladies! I like the site and will return to it. |
|
05-11-22 04:11am
Replies (0)
|
|
