| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Sapphix
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This network is so good; it’s overwhelming
Includes Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush
Unlimited downloads of videos and picture zips
Almost unlimited amount of very pretty models
It has an extensive set of tags to search from
The three sites combined have around 3,000 scenes
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming. |
| Cons: |
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface |
| Bottom Line: |
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix. |
|
10-11-23 07:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
XFeeds
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content. |
|
09-18-23 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Say Uncle
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too
Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels
Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network.
Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited.
Video download quality goes up to 1080p
It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen |
| Cons: |
The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be
If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too.
Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view.
I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic.
The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included.
I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes.
This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks. |
|
08-07-23 10:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
BoyFun
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes |
| Cons: |
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models |
| Bottom Line: |
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women. |
|
08-07-23 10:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
All Over 30
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site gets lost in all the trendy MILF sites
Older women getting to act like younger women
The size of the site must be seen to be believed. There are nearly 8,000 videos and over 17,000 photosets
Newer videos have 4K downloads and most of the older videos have at least 720p or 1080p downloads
You can download the photosets in zips
Download speeds are good (80% my max)
Multiple daily updates. |
| Cons: |
The site is so big it does become a con unless you can figure out a filter you like to use on searches
The sex videos (with men, lesbian) are not that good. |
| Bottom Line: |
Going back to another one of my hobbies, music, this site makes me think somewhere out there someone made a never-released song called, “MILF Porn killed the older woman category of porn”. It’s true, just like the Buggles and their song and video, “Video Killed the Radio Star”. If we look at this porn compared to MILF porn we can see some pretty big discrepancies in how these 30+ year old models are treated and even how they are presented.
MILF porn almost always relies on the old theory around women hit their sexual peak in their late 30s, early 40s. The problem with that is the MILF models are on pornsites. You’re just not going to present the MILF as anything more than a horny slut based on the MILF genre. All Over 30, like FTV MILFs, shows older women being sexy, pretty, hot, posing and everything many of these models never had the chance to do in real life.
MILFs are sexy, horny and all of that, but they’re not cheap, desperate sluts unless in a MILF porn scene. That is what All Over 30 shows. These are confident, successful women who are proud of their bodies and want to show it off. Isn’t that sexy just by itself? The confidence, and I will say it, even when they’re not as in good as shape as they were 15 years ago. You can see the difference between these models and the models on those mommy teaches sites. These women are confident in themselves. Those other MILFs are confident because they made a young guy get hard, not realizing, he gets hard over everything.
All over 30 not only has a huge selection, they have videos with up to 4K downloads, downloadable photosets and the photos are high resolution. There is a useful search engine and tags and a full model list that works great.
You may have noticed my con about the sex videos not being as good as the solo videos. That’s never been truer than on here and it’s not saying the sex videos aren’t good. It goes into what I’ve been talking about with the MILF niche. Nearly all MILF scenes on sites all across the internet are sex, hardcore, minimal lesbian unless it’s with a younger woman. These solo scenes are relatively rare in the porn world. Most models in their 30s are too far beyond the tease or masturbation scenes. It’s why I like these solo scenes so much.
I’ve talked about this with other MILF sites too, you are seeing as natural and undirected solo scenes with these MILFs than you will see on any site. These women have a decade or more of masturbating and being disappointed with sex. They know what they like, and it takes a good producer and director to get that out of a model.
This is as good of a site as you will find in this genre. The site is even easy to use even with the huge size. Everything is high quality and downloads are unlimited. |
|
07-09-23 07:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians
Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines
Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each
It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site
The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre
Downloadable videos are up to 4K |
| Cons: |
In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has
Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman.
Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!”
Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable.
That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey.
Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single.
As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded.
It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. |
|
07-09-23 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of porn’s most marketed stars … Joanna Angel
Alternative, goth, tatted, all apply to nearly every scene on Joana’s sites
There are 237 videos to download
Site’s navigation is straightforward and simple
Very hardcore in some of the scenes
Some of the videos even have 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no picture zip downloads
Joanna isn’t in every scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I first was introduced to Joanna Angel’s content on the Gamma-owned Burning Angel. There are lots of reasons for me to like her. She’s about the same size I am. She hasn’t succumbed to plastic surgery. She’s around 40 and she’s never wanted to fit in. I don’t know if her success in porn shows popularity or she’s just that good of a performer. She is one of the most prolific female porn stars as well.
This site is very much a solo site about Joanna, but there are friends or guests too. The sex varies from heavy tease (my favorite) to all out hardcore sex (my least favorite). Joanna, despite her tiny frame, shows the strength and power of a confident woman. She does it without having to rely on stories and plots to show her strength.
The videos are mostly downloadable in 1080p and 720p, but there are some that can be downloaded in 4K.
There are picture sets, but those are not downloadable. The site is a back to the basics type site. There are four filters to separate the content. You have scenes, pornstars, tags and shop.
That is even simpler for me. I’m not interested in the friends or other pornstars. The tags aren’t helpful to me and I don’t think I’m interested in anything from the shop.
Joanna shows off some of her skills including tease and denial of a guy, not for sure if that’s her husband (he’s a pornstar) or not. The scenes with Joanna have near perfect chemistry and good tension. I had the same feeling with Burning Angel scenes as scenes from this solo site. If Joanna isn’t in the scene, I’m not interested in it.
There are no bonuses or extra content. You just get Joanna’s site and nothing else. I’m okay with that, but I think I’ve shown I’m a huge fan of Joanna.
She is considered one of the most important models of alt porn and is considered one of the pioneers of the genre. All while looking 25-30, when she’s really 40+. I take every scene she is in as her chance to impress the viewer. I don’t think she’s let anyone down very much. This site is required for those that are Joanna Angel fans. I would even say it’s better than Burning Angel, if you’re just in it for the Joanna content. |
|
06-11-23 03:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Alt Erotic
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been in an alternative mood lately and have to say, this may be one of the most underrated sites on the internet.
Very large site considering it’s a newer site. They have almost 500 videos and 500 photo sets.
1080p downloads for all videos.
Picture sets can be downloaded in high-resolution zip files
Gives new meaning to screwed, blued and tattooed.
No download limits and it’s 100% exclusive |
| Cons: |
As a fan of tattooed porn, I have said it before and continue to – do tattooed people never have regular sex or play sex games? It’s all hardcore at 120 MPH.
Missing a few pro favorites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Alt Erotica continues my alternative porn journey that included the great solo site of Joanna Angel. Burning Angel is likely the best known alternative porn site. Alt Erotica takes different spins at alt porn. There are the reality based scenes of a young woman going to get tattooed in a parlor, only to end up having sex with the tattooist, his friend and a cameraman or two. Sarcasm drips as I say the sacred sanctity of the tattoo parlor.
Am I the only one that has always wondered if sex happens in a tattoo parlor? I’m just wondering since this is the first site I’ve seen use the idea. The scenarios are believable at least to me they are. There’s a focus on women getting nude and opening their legs in front of strangers (tattooists). It’s good, I like it and it’s very believable.
The site as a whole is great. They have high quality downloads. No download limits, good navigation and it’s creative. The picture sets are good and are well-edited. You could look through a picture set and explain what’s going to happen in the video. It just feels like this site is ran by experienced professionals. No download limits, no gimmicky pricing, all exclusive content and other than a few exceptions – they have every hot and sexy tattooed model in porn on this site.
I don’t think I will ever know why all tattooed pornstars can only operate in fast, hardcore sex, but maybe it’s best that I don’t know. The biller continues to show the professionalism as they have billing by Epoch. They do send me emails every few months and offer a promo. They also offer a yearly promo around the holidays. I could see someone joining this as their primary or favorite site. It’s that unique and has quality in everything they do.
I think Alt Erotica is neck and neck with Burning Angel for the top tattooed hardcore site. I also believe Alt Erotica has better stories and premises than Burning Angel. It’s one of my favorite sites and if you’re remotely interested in tattooed models, it will probably be one of your favorites too. |
|
06-11-23 03:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy |
| Cons: |
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
An easy 95 that could easily move up to 100. |
|
05-10-23 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As technically impressive transsexual site as you will ever find.
Unlimited video downloads and photoset downloads.
The videos have offered 4K downloads for nearly 6 years.
Even though the older videos have a lower resolution, they’re not poor.
One of the best sites for solo transsexuals
You can register through Paypal |
| Cons: |
Grooby seems to hold the rights to a lot of transsexual sites. This creates numerous problems I noticed.
Prices are outrageous in 2023 – nearly $40 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
Grooby is undoubtedly the biggest name in transsexual porn.The main problems that come from that are: Seemingly created their own supply and demand pricing. Can separate traanssexuals into more niches (Asian, Black, etc) to require the member to join multiple high priced sites just to see the different races of models. And if you’re like me and want to join multiple sites each month, you’re going to be spending near or even over $100 for 3 Grooby sites even if they give you a discount.
Business Philosophy aside, Grooby delivers exactly what they offer. Real, very attractive transsexuals masturbating and having sex. I like to use Nubiles.net in my comparisons to sites of other genres. Grooby is 99% like Nubiles. On paper, in numbers, in technical comparisons, very few if any sites can compete with them, but the action in the videos does not live up to the high standard the presentation creates. You also are getting standard porn – even if it is transsexuals. Nothing here is pushing the boundaries or moving the transsexual genre forward.
The good news is very few porn fans really care that much about those things. The bad news is the ones who do are usually reviewers. Only Nubiles.net calls for a review this objective. I have to look at Grooby as a site that the average member has never visited before joining. Like it’s their first ever porn site membership and they (the member) is without biases. When you view ths Grooby site that way it’s easily a 95 or higher. When you add subjectivity to the review, the score drops down to the low 80s. It’s just not that entertaining to someone who has joined over 100 sites.
They have provided 4K downloads for nearly 6 years and most everything else can be downloaded in HD. There are no download limits and the photosets are probably the highest quality transsexual photos I have seen. It’s just there are some missing elements I’m used to like some level of sexual tension (good kind). Instead, I’m just loaded down with tons of content that is mostly generic.
The action is either transsexual hardcore sex or solo. There’s not much variety there. Likewise, because Grooby has so many other sites, there’s not much difference in how the models look (race).
For me, this site or several combined Grooby sites could easily approach the 100 score, but just like with Nubiles.net there’s a little something extra that is missing. I’m going with a middle ground between 100 and 85 of 93. If you’re new to the site and porn in general, I could see you scoring it 98-100. |
|
04-12-23 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site. |
|
02-08-23 06:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Joined along with their site Girl Girl
Very good hardcore site
Easy to use and navigate
4K downloads on newer videos and 1080p or 720p also
Zip downloadable photo sets
Huge site with regular updates still coming |
| Cons: |
Hardcore sites usually bore me and this one did as well.
I mainly joined this to get access to Girl Girl.
Most if not all of the models are pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was joining Girl Girl and received an offer to add Jules Jordan. Both are owned and operated by the same company. It was a good deal for the two sites.
Jules Jordan content is similar to most hardcore sites and DVDs. There are some scenes with stories and plots, but nothing groundbreaking. The site’s biggest selling point is hardcore porn that’s not too hardcore and violent. I do know this can be a pro or con depending on the person: Nearly all or all of the models are pros. The reason I consider that a con is if you’ve been a member of other hardcore sites like Evil Angel, Backed, Tushy etc, the scenes here feature most of the same models and the action isn’t much different. The flip side of that is you do have pros performing and that means good performances (for porn). Personally, I prefer amateur models, especially females, but I knew what I was getting when I joined this site so I won’t deduct any points.
Their technical side is impressive with 4K downloads on all new scenes and even the older ones have 720p and/or 1080p, Their above average quality picture sets can be downloaded in zip files. The site packs in the quantity with over 10,000 scenes on over 2,500 DVDs. The videos are high quality in technical quality and the action is above average for a hardcore site.
You may want more from your hardcore scenes. The stories and plots are limited in scope and are usually just based on the niche (anal, oral, etc). The site is easy to use considering how big it is and the navigation works well.
Besides having over 10,000 scenes they have regular updates still coming in. I would list no bonus content as a con, but with the bundle I received, Girl Girl was included and I found it to be one of the best lesbian sites I’ve ever joined. They could work on adding some variety and improving storylines, but that’s not a big deal – in my opinion – to hardcore fans, which I am not.
I will compare it directly to Evil Angel and say I prefer the Jules Jordan hardcore scenes. But Jules Jordan doesn’t offer the variety of niches Evil Angel has. It’s a recommended site for hardcore fans. Just don’t expect anything amateur or homemade. |
|
01-10-23 02:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
39
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn.
More than 20 sites included.
Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models.
The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche.
Newer videos are downloadable in 4K
Nearly daily update across the network. |
| Cons: |
When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress!
The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter.
The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too.
The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act.
Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex.
The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting.
With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. |
|
11-28-22 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Slayed
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn
Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads
Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price.
Pretty and sexy models
Scenes are fun and have good production
Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem.
The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned.
The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two.
There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle.
With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. |
|
11-06-22 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite site on my favorite network.
Women watching, joining, instructing a guy to masturbate. She’s usually clothed.
Comes with Pure CFNM, a full network of CFNM sites.
Believable very attractive females with average guys.
Unlimited downloadable videos and pictures.
The theme makes a story useless. You know the story just from what you see. |
| Cons: |
Tries too hard to stick to the CF part of CFNM.
Some scenes go into degrading the males. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has improved over the years. Most of the improvement is in the recognition of their scenes becoming redundant due to the CFNM genre. Adding Lady Voyeur to CFNM is, in theory, a perfect blend, but we are still talking about porn where men far outnumber female viewers. This niche sticks to one or more women watching a man masturbate. I’m sure there are men who wouldn’t enjoy this type of porn – especially when you factor in the degradation.
Having said that, Lady Voyeur, typically shows the female as being very aroused and even entertained while watching the man masturbate.
There are scenarios that pop up in every scene like will the guy’s cum hit the woman? Will the female get more involved? Will the female masturbate too? It’s one of the few niches that keeps an open window for what “could” happen in each scene.
There still is the problem of this type of porn doesn’t leave much room for a lot of fetishes or niches. While it is called Voyeur, it’s not really voyeur other than the woman watching the man. da room. There is nothing blocking the woman from seeing the man or him seeing her looking at him. That’s why I said the voyeur part Is questionable if it’s really voyeur.
You also get full access to Pure CFNM, by far and away, the biggest and best CFNM network. The downloads are unlimited and there are photosets with most scenes. I just enjoy the question of how involved will the female get in the scene. The scenes can be downloaded in high definition and the photos are high resolution. I do think they could make the scenes longer and add more variety to the Lady Voyeurs scenes, but it’s a minor complaint for a site that does a lot more right than wrong. The access to Pure CFNM is just a major bonus.
This is a great deal if you’re new to CFNM. While the different niches in the genre are limited, those are still enough to change things up so that you can enjoy it without feeling like it’s redundant. You’ll only be disappointed if you’re expecting intercourse or oral sex. Which is something I like about Lady Voyeurs, you will see the women tease those and maybe give the guy a little oral. It makes every scene worth watching from beginning to end. The key there is CFNM is not an action. Porn usually specifies its niche or genre by the name of the site like “Only Blowjob”. Pure CFNM just tells you there will be clothed females and nude males. The actions are not mentioned. |
|
10-11-22 07:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes? |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some. |
| Bottom Line: |
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too. |
|
08-09-22 09:56am
Replies (1)
|
Review
49
|
Strokies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Impressive handjob, tease and blowjob site.
Weekly update
575 scenes and the women are all above average in looks.
Every scene has 4K download option and 1080p.
Downloads are unlimited and included in membership.
Surprising to me, the newer scenes are better than the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be using the same guys for most scenes. That becomes boring for me.
Older scenes are very short and more formulaic. |
| Bottom Line: |
Gay male sites have pushed me away. I decided to try this straight handjob site featuring some really pretty young women. Handjobs can be boring and repetitive. Just like solo male can be. You start realizing there’s just not a lot to do with the male body.
It's different for me to see the newer scenes improving in comparison to the older scenes. Most sites I have joined are the opposite of that. Most sites look like they start out strong, get bored and just start making the same scene over and over. This site has added some depth to the handjobs over the years. You get some edging, some frenulum play, very intense tongue teasing, it’s really good and sexy. I don’t know most of these models. The bios of the models lead me to believe they are mostly pro models, but I haven’t seen them before. Their names even look like pro models. Maybe they are, but at least they are attractive. The last straight handjob site I joined had a lot of average or below looking women. These women are a step or two up. The videos include some interview and talking before the handjob starts. Most of the models seem to have a set script they are building from.
The older scenes were mostly under 15 minutes. The newer scenes are over 20 and many are over 30 minutes. They have added some depth to the scenes. That, if nothing else, makes it seem like these women really enjoy giving a handjob. I do believe, with my limited knowledge, of the genre, that is very important.
I was shocked to see that every scene has HD and 4K downloads and there over 500 scenes. It’s not a brand-new site. Looks like it started in 2015. They have a weekly update every Friday. They also include photos and zip downloads.
The real attraction is those newer scenes that feature edging. I don’t think there’s many things in porn more exciting for a female than seeing the guy struggle through holding his orgasms only to finally get to release. That’s one of my favorite parts of porn. I could get by with cumshot compilations. The cumshots on Strokies are very good too. That leads to the negative. Even with the additions of edging and teasing, it's still just a handjob site. There are a lot of scenes where they female will also masturbate, but they could do so much more with that. I have to turn to tube sites to find mutual masturbation. Which is a very popular niche, but no one except amateurs seem to be doing it. Strokies comes the closest on mutual masturbation. They will have the female straddle the guy’s leg and hip area with her legs spread open and touching herself while she masturbates the guy with her other hand. Scenes like that would move the site up to my favorite if they did that more often. That is a very good niche to me.
I did mention in the cons there’s not a lot of different guys and that’s based just on the penis I can see. I feel like I know the guy at this point. I would recognize your dick from a crowd of dicks! That maybe hurts the site a little. I have heard of the term stunt cock before. That’s in hardcore sex where there are 8-10 positions per scene. There’s not much variation on a handjob site. The same penis right there in the camera view in every scene. Maybe dress it up in a little suit? I know that there are other women out there that feel the same way. You watch enough of these scenes and you will have seen this guy’s penis more than your boyfriend’s. Sorry about the joking around. There’s just not a lot to talk about in handjob porn. It's a very good site. I haven’t ever found that much attraction to handjob porn even though it seems like I should. I will come back to this one. It would be a good site to try out if you’re curious about handjob porn. It has enough variations to keep it from being strict handjob porn. |
|
07-11-22 09:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
|
