| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is a re-review of Viv Thomas, which I reviewed just about a year ago. I’m still a member on it..
In my opinion, the prettiest models on any pornsite, sure, most of the models are on other sites too, but Viv Thomas’ site has magic other sites don’t have.
There are 3,617 photo sets to download and 2,424 videos to download.
There are 1,217 models.
The downloadable videos are unlimited and newer ones have 4K.
It’s a Met-Art Network site so it has the navigation, usability and all the bells and whistles
The most passionate lesbian scenes I have ever viewed. |
| Cons: |
I have read complaints in the scene comments about old scenes being removed.
It has kept me hostage as a member for over a year. I just can’t talk myself into canceling. |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s not uncommon for us to re-review favorite sites, but this re-review was brought on by me staying as a member way longer than I thought I would. I think that’s the very biggest compliment to a site. Viv Thomas has always been a name in porn that I have been drawn to. I used to look up his videos on tube sites. Back then, I didn’t even know this site existed. I have always felt like Vivid was the only studio that could make porn as good as Viv Thomas. I am speaking solely on the lesbian genre.
The site has all the technical numbers you could ever want. There are 2,424 videos and the newer ones can be downloaded in 4K resolution, even though I do only download in 720 and 1080. The picture sets are spectacular with 5700x3700 resolution on the large zip filed pictures. There’s a purpose with every photo. If you flip through them you can watch the women in motion.
There are roughly 5-6 updates per week.
During my second month of membership, I decided to keep letting the subscription recur and that was over 10 months ago. I just didn’t think there was a site that could impress me that much and keep my attention on it. But Viv Thomas has
Why did I list the models looks as a pro when they are on other sites? Viv Thomas site gets a different version of the models. They are more feminine, sexier, less-robotic and look like everyone of them is competing to have the best, sexiest, hottest scene on Viv’s site. I have been buying and collecting porn long enough to know the older scenes are the best. Now a current producer/director on Viv Thomas, retired model Sandra Shine – has scenes on Viv Thomas, of her as the star that blow away newer scenes on any site. There are years, not a handful of updates, that every scene is a little hotter than the previous one.
Clothed women, touching each other, kissing, tongues touching, until the clothes seemingly just melts off their bodies. Maybe it is the sign of the times in porn? The Viv Thomas new scenes are very good and, in my opinion, as good as any lesbian site’s scenes, but it’s those older scenes you have to watch. It doesn’t even matter if you like the models. You won’t see this much heat in a scene on any other site. Maybe you can, but I sure can’t.
The site is owned or managed by Met-Art now and you can see that. The videos/films are in a tab, the photos are in a tab and the model list is in a tab. It’s that simple and it’s another reason I love this site. I did join Viv Thomas a long time ago. It had a video site and a photo site back then. Having all this content on one easy to use site makes me not want to cancel!
I do think it’s humorous to read the comments on the different scenes. You will always have that one guy that says all they need is a dick in the scene. That’s because he is that turned on by the scene! I have seen some of the male/female Viv Thomas scenes from the late 90s and they are good, but I don’t see the removal of those as anything to be that upset about. It looks like Met-Art decided to promote Viv Thomas’ lesbian scenes and who could possibly argue with their decision?
In my now 14 months of membership, I could stop joining other sites and just join Viv Thomas. It’s that good . The scenes are not only believable, but are so hot they become nearly unbelievable.
A site like this one could hurt my viewing of other porn. I want to see the models looking like they are willing to tear their paycheck up. Scenes that are that good are very rare, but I could list over 100 from Viv Thomas that gave me that feeling. Combine that quality with the technical aspects and I have what is my perfect site. |
|
02-13-24 09:57pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It’s hard to call this site underrated, but it really is.
Sister-site to I Feel Myself and Beautiful Agony
Photocentric site that does have some videos, too
You can download the photos and videos
Pretty, amateur models
Big site that’s old enough to be legal (over 20 years) |
| Cons: |
I am sure one reason it’s not as popular as it should be is the focus on photos
Models are not only amateur, but also natural and that means some are hairy |
| Bottom Line: |
I mentioned this site being underrated based on no new member reviews in over 10 years. I remember reading the reviews that are still here, back in 2010 or so. I was a fan of I Feel Myself and that led to me giving I Shot Myself a try. Now that I think of it, I wouldn’t be surprised if the name of the site possibly has turned people away. I do remember when we would say self-shot picture instead of selfies.
For me, this is one of those sites that’s polarizing to the general porn loving population. That’s where I’m going to draw a line. Being a member has made me curious about the possibility of a site like this one, being relevant in 2023. Would there be a market for a site like this one? I have always heard and even experienced, to an extent, the cyclical nature of porn, but when we’re usually discussing something being cyclical, technology isn’t a major part of that. In this case, technology is not a major part of it, it’s the bottom line (sorry, had to do it).
It’s clear to us that are old enough to remember early 2000s porn that pictures were preferred in the late 90s, early 2000s. The file sizes were much more acceptable and doable with even dial-up internet. See the question it leaves us with? Did pictures fail against videos just because people wanted newer technology or do people find videos to be superior quality? The twist to this is I just think people have become more desensitized to sex and some will argue, more open, to sex in general.
I’m glad I’m just reviewing this site and not trying to figure out any kind of truth in why pictures lost popularity. This site hasn’t changed much and I can see why some would complain about that. Then again, it still does exactly what it says it’s going to do. It offers real, amateur models posing nude and pleasuring themselves. The pictures you can download are excellent quality and you’re not going to see many “dumb photographer” photos. There’s more realism and believability from these photos than you’ll see on the professional photography sites.
Models are typically young (18-24), but not 100%. The site is based out of Australia and I personally, have liked every Australian porn site I’ve joined. There is a difference between the culture these models are from compared to US and UK/Euro models. The models show real enjoyment in being naked and in front of a camera. You really can’t find much to complain about. There are nearly 1,000 videos and 12,000 photo zips.
Everything about the site is different than what you’re used to from a porn site and while that can be a negative, it also can be a positive if you take the time to enjoy the content. |
|
12-12-23 09:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good network that used to be great
Nearly all models are attractive
Easily searchable and overall navigation
A good mix of niches
You can almost always find a cheap promo price |
| Cons: |
Download limit of 25 videos per month
Picture sets are mediocre
A lot of the sites I remember from this network are no longer on this network |
| Bottom Line: |
I can remember joining Lets Doe It back when it was first being advertised. It was very good, even great. Possibly one of the most diverse networks in porn. Then they decided to split it up and moved 13 of the sites to Amateur Euro. That was bad enough, but then they decided to operate with download limits. I am almost positive, at one time, the download limit was 100 per month. It’s now 25.
I joined Lets Doe It just a few weeks ago for a very low promo price. I have visited the site 4 times and downloaded nothing. I believe download limits do that to a member’s interest. Instead of looking at videos and thinking about which ones you like and want to download, you end up looking at videos with the thinking of “eliminating” some so you won’t hit the download limit.
Lets Doe It’s potential was very high, but they have not improved their photo sets and it’s just starting to feel like a downward spiral.
The models are still very attractive, but the lack of stories in the videos, mediocre picture sets and restrictive download limits just saps a lot of the energy as a member.
I would like to say there’s still something great going on at Lets Do It, but I find it difficult to say that. If you find a model you like or a niche you like, you have to start focusing on not downloading too many videos. For what it’s worth, their other network, Amateur Euro has completely fallen off with no updates. Lets Do It at least does still update.
The videos can be downloaded in HD quality and are good enough. Other than those allowed 25 downloads, there’s just not much else to interest me. I doubt I will download any of the videos now and can say unless something improves, there’s little to no reason for me to return as a member. Your experience with the site may be better than mine. My score for it is partially based in the potential.
I do believe they could right the ship with a few changes, maybe even just raise the download limit to 50 or 100. I don’t remember their download limits being as restrictive as they are now and back when Lets Doe It first started, there were no download limits. If downloading doesn’t interest you then you can adjust the score accordingly. Otherwise, this is at best, an average network. |
|
11-07-23 12:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Family Strokes
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The old dilemma of if you cannot get at least average porn with a great story, go for great porn with a bad story.
High definition porn that you can download
The site is simple to use
Joining and canceling is easy and hassle-free
The pictures are good and can be downloaded
Cute models that fit the theme of the scenes |
| Cons: |
Trying to keep up with all these family trees of cousins, stepsiblings, aunts, uncles, grandfathers and the neverending quest of fauxcest porn
There is a network, Team Skeet offers, that includes Family Strokes, but the price is $50 per month. If you like Family Strokes, just stick to the single site membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
So, I went to a family reunion back in July 2023 and found myself babbling about Family Strokes. The believability of this niche may be important to some people, but I’m not one of them. Let’s keep it as unbelievable as possible just so the thoughts of a Family Strokes scene happening at my family reunion doesn’t enter my brain.
Family Strokes has been around for awhile and I have been a fan of the site since its earliest days. I like the dumbness and lack of an even attempt to make it seem believable. How believable is it that niece Jessica is flirting with her cousin Paul, but her uncle Joe is barbecuing and the one watching her flirtatious ways? When cousin Paul leaves the area to do whatever porn extras do while the sex is happening, Uncle Joe decided it was time to throw a Bratwurst of his own at niece Jessica. Tiny Jessica hopped up on her uncle Joe’s lap and hid his bratwurst in her lady-bun. Out of nowhere, cousin Paul returns and sees what has transpired since he left the camera’s view. Before Paul jumps in and joins his dad in introducing Jessica to the family, grandfather Jacob shows up and realizes he no longer needs ED medication.
Yes, unbelievable, far-fetched, but really funny if you have a sense of humor and more importantly, it’s quite sexy. Porn in 2023 either guides the viewer down a negative path or positive path. It’s rarely noticed, but I notice it with Family Strokes It’s funny, it doesn’t try to convince you those people are really related. It is like showing the mainstream movie, “Spaceballs” to a Star Wars fan.
I prefer being positive and avoiding as much negativity, even if implied or under the guise of “fiction”.
Family Strokes continues to be one of my top sites. I would even like to see more hardcore sites turn to a positive side. The models, most of them, have fun and you can even see the hidden attempts of covering their laughter. The videos are downloadable as are the photo sets and I can say this is one of the few sites, I have downloaded every video from. That is over 3-4 memberships in the last year.
I will mention the Team Skeet network that includes access to Family Strokes, it is called Team Skeet Taboo. I haven’t tried it nor do I intend to. Team Skeet has enough confusing membership options with downloads, stream only, you get this site and that site, but not that site. I just join Family Strokes and enjoy myself and my membership.
One of my favorite sites and that’s not likely going to change. |
|
11-07-23 11:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Sapphix
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This network is so good; it’s overwhelming
Includes Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush
Unlimited downloads of videos and picture zips
Almost unlimited amount of very pretty models
It has an extensive set of tags to search from
The three sites combined have around 3,000 scenes
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming. |
| Cons: |
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface |
| Bottom Line: |
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix. |
|
10-11-23 07:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
XFeeds
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content. |
|
09-18-23 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Say Uncle
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A network of gay sites and it’s worth a look for straight women and gay men too
Includes access to 5 sites and advertised as over 30 channels
Over 2,000 scenes and picture sets on the whole network.
Everything is downloadable and the downloads are unlimited.
Video download quality goes up to 1080p
It's the most entertaining gay porn I have seen |
| Cons: |
The combination of 30 channel claims and faulty navigation make using the network, more difficult than it should be
If you’re tired of straight false incest porn; here’s you a whole network of gay false incest porn |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network back months ago, but didn’t ever review it. I rejoined a few weeks ago and am happy to review it with the proclamation of it’s the most entertaining gay porn I have seen. The network includes access to Say Uncle, Brother Crush, Family Dick, Latin Leche, Perverted Perps and the site, not a joke, Missionary Boys. The sites do a good and at least maybe believable job of living up to these themes. The brother crush site is stepbrothers having sex and playing with each other. Say Uncle is older men dominating younger men. Family Dick is just all-around false incest. Latin Leche is of Latin men spilling their boy milk for each other. Perverted Perps is a lot like any of the false cop arrests someone and makes them have sex to free them. Missionary Boys is young men in Missionary outfits and doing things with each other and with the older men too.
Definitely a step in the right direction of perversion. I never realized how politically correct gay porn is until I started seeing themes like Missionary Boys. That’s definitely pushing the genre ahead or behind – depending on your view.
I have not seen many gay sites that even use themes or outfits in their scenes. I may get booed or pelted by tomatoes for saying false gay incest does not seem as ludicrous as false straight incest. I’m sure there are stepbrothers who see their stepbrother nude for the first time and realize they like it. I’m sure there are older men who try and take advantage of their younger nephews or stepsons and yes, I’m sure there are cops and authority figures who abuse their power to get the sex they are ashamed to tell their wife about. Most of all, Missionary Boys, may just be the most believable gay porn site ever created. I say that with no ill-intentions and as a Catholic.
The network has almost 2,000 scenes and 2,000 accompanying picture sets. There are no limits on downloads and downloads come with the basic subscription. One thing to make note of is the price. It shows as $50 per month, but when I signed up, there was a $14.95 promo for the whole network and downloads included.
I do think the dark humor twist is needed in gay porn. I’ve heard many gay jokes told by gay men about sitting on grandpa’s lap and uncle helping with a shower. But it does seem the gay porn world is highly politically correct and not touching the taboo themes.
This network is very good porn for a gay man and some of it still has appeal for straight women. It’s at least partially entertaining and giggle-worthy at times and it’s updating with a huge back catalog. Great network that I believe is the best of the gay networks. |
|
08-07-23 10:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
BoyFun
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Massive gay porn site that excels at solo scenes.
Daily updates
Nearly 6,000 scenes and even more picture sets
Downloads are unlimited, and everything can be downloaded.
Fun and playful scenes which I think is different for gay porn.
Video downloads are 4K, HD and smaller mobile sizes |
| Cons: |
Gay porn is becoming “gayer” and less friendly to us straight women.
Mostly young guy models |
| Bottom Line: |
I slowed on my joining of gay male sites. It is the closest straight women have to pornography focused on the male anatomy, but as time goes on, the gayness of the genre has started taking away the ability to fantasize the guys are performing for me.
My cons are not cons for some people and I think even their major audience (gay men) would find as pros. The male models are generally young, fit and clean-shaven. I think there is a large group of gay men who love that niche and if you are one, this site does the twink, metrosexual look very well. The other con is how much gay porn is turning gayer. Little touches that I’m sure gay men love seeing are reminding me I’m a straight woman and not a gay man. Use of dildos is an example.
The review is intended to also promote the site to the gay man audience. There are high quality and unlimited downloads of videos and picture sets. The videos can be downloaded as high as 4K and offer small mobile resolutions as well.
There’s no real story to the scenes. It’s either solo and supposed to be like you’re a voyeur watching the guy masturbate or men having sex with each other. The solo scenes are good enough for me, but do wish they would reconsider the use of sex toys during masturbation. If a woman uses a strap-on dildo on a man, I like it. If a man is having anal sex with another man, I can at least fantasize I’m sneaking a peek of them having sex. If a man is sitting by himself and while rubbing his penis, turns on his side and shoves a 9 inch dildo up his butt, I really can’t fantasize I’m involved or interested in that at all.
The site does have daily updates and I believe does the gay porn genre as good as any site. The navigation is also great and it at least lets me separate the solo scenes from the hardcore ones.
There is a playful and fun side to some of the scenes and it’s worth mentioning. I have said many times before that gay porn is far behind straight porn. That is because gay porn, regularly, uses nothing to make it distinctive or original. Some of the scenes on Boy Fun use roles and titles to add some fun and even my first ever exposure to gay false incest porn. That does add a whole new dimension to gay porn since it’s stepbrothers and uncle by marriage as examples. Those scenes at least make sense to the viewer and likewise, it helps turn the genre into aimed solely at gay men. I would rate this site even higher if I didn’t feel out of place watching it, but I felt like this type of gay porn is off-limits for us women. |
|
08-07-23 10:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
All Over 30
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site gets lost in all the trendy MILF sites
Older women getting to act like younger women
The size of the site must be seen to be believed. There are nearly 8,000 videos and over 17,000 photosets
Newer videos have 4K downloads and most of the older videos have at least 720p or 1080p downloads
You can download the photosets in zips
Download speeds are good (80% my max)
Multiple daily updates. |
| Cons: |
The site is so big it does become a con unless you can figure out a filter you like to use on searches
The sex videos (with men, lesbian) are not that good. |
| Bottom Line: |
Going back to another one of my hobbies, music, this site makes me think somewhere out there someone made a never-released song called, “MILF Porn killed the older woman category of porn”. It’s true, just like the Buggles and their song and video, “Video Killed the Radio Star”. If we look at this porn compared to MILF porn we can see some pretty big discrepancies in how these 30+ year old models are treated and even how they are presented.
MILF porn almost always relies on the old theory around women hit their sexual peak in their late 30s, early 40s. The problem with that is the MILF models are on pornsites. You’re just not going to present the MILF as anything more than a horny slut based on the MILF genre. All Over 30, like FTV MILFs, shows older women being sexy, pretty, hot, posing and everything many of these models never had the chance to do in real life.
MILFs are sexy, horny and all of that, but they’re not cheap, desperate sluts unless in a MILF porn scene. That is what All Over 30 shows. These are confident, successful women who are proud of their bodies and want to show it off. Isn’t that sexy just by itself? The confidence, and I will say it, even when they’re not as in good as shape as they were 15 years ago. You can see the difference between these models and the models on those mommy teaches sites. These women are confident in themselves. Those other MILFs are confident because they made a young guy get hard, not realizing, he gets hard over everything.
All over 30 not only has a huge selection, they have videos with up to 4K downloads, downloadable photosets and the photos are high resolution. There is a useful search engine and tags and a full model list that works great.
You may have noticed my con about the sex videos not being as good as the solo videos. That’s never been truer than on here and it’s not saying the sex videos aren’t good. It goes into what I’ve been talking about with the MILF niche. Nearly all MILF scenes on sites all across the internet are sex, hardcore, minimal lesbian unless it’s with a younger woman. These solo scenes are relatively rare in the porn world. Most models in their 30s are too far beyond the tease or masturbation scenes. It’s why I like these solo scenes so much.
I’ve talked about this with other MILF sites too, you are seeing as natural and undirected solo scenes with these MILFs than you will see on any site. These women have a decade or more of masturbating and being disappointed with sex. They know what they like, and it takes a good producer and director to get that out of a model.
This is as good of a site as you will find in this genre. The site is even easy to use even with the huge size. Everything is high quality and downloads are unlimited. |
|
07-09-23 07:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Mommy's Girl
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A collaboration between genres: MILFs meet younger lesbians
Most of the scenes have good to excellent and relevant storylines
Over 550 scenes featuring a video and picture set with each
It is part of Adult Time and if you’re familiar with Adult Time, you know to sign up for the downloads included option or you will end up with a streaming only site
The acting, screenplay, settings, all make these scenes some of the best in the lesbian genre
Downloadable videos are up to 4K |
| Cons: |
In my opinion, it does not play to the most relatable storylines the younger/older niche has
Adult Time’s navigation can be annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed All Over 30. I find that MILF porn features 3 types of MILFs. I believe the least likely in real life is an older woman with a younger man scene. I speaking from my own experience. Not only do most of the 30s women I know not like younger men, we are even less interested in sex with the younger man. The middle and more acceptable niche – even believable, is older woman with a younger woman.
Blame social media for my jaded view of younger men. If only I received a free membership to a porn site each time an unknown younger guy sent me a message that said, “I know you older women are hitting your sexual peak!”
Mommy’s Girl starts off with the basis of what I think is the most believable of the MILF having sex, fantasy. I do believe younger women is more believable than younger men. The scenes also include believable stories, but for my money, they do not play enough to the most realistic storyline. The older woman who has been married – and her sex life is boring. Somewhere in my sheepishly perverted brain, I want to believe that is how the first threesomes happened. A husband came in from working 12 hours to find his wife in a 69 with a younger woman. It seems likely and believable.
That does leave room to then bring the older man in to wear his wife and her girlfriend out, but that may be too complex for hardcore porn to convey.
Some storylines that I believe they do cover well includes the younger woman being a fitness instructor who was hired to train the MILF. Very believable. Especially if the younger woman is single. Horny is implied when I said she’s single.
As strong as that storyline is (younger woman, older woman), it’s still not as believable as MILFs masturbating, I can all but guarantee and bet my life savings on there are more masturbating MILFs than ones with younger men or younger women. It’s also, in my opinion, a way for older women in porn to show they are still sexy even when not having sex with someone else. There’s more riding on their performance in solo scenes than lesbian scenes. There is a lot of content too. Roughly 550 videos and 550 picture sets. The majority of videos can be downloaded in 4K and all picture sets can be downloaded.
It's a great site that, for me, is a little overhyped based on the stories. The stories are good for porn, but the stories are also repeated and twisted. I do see the addition of Adult Time as a major bonus, but if you’ve been an Adult Time member before, you are probably going to be like me and be joining mainly for one specific site. I did that to compare this version of MILF porn with the version All Over 30 has. |
|
07-09-23 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of porn’s most marketed stars … Joanna Angel
Alternative, goth, tatted, all apply to nearly every scene on Joana’s sites
There are 237 videos to download
Site’s navigation is straightforward and simple
Very hardcore in some of the scenes
Some of the videos even have 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no picture zip downloads
Joanna isn’t in every scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I first was introduced to Joanna Angel’s content on the Gamma-owned Burning Angel. There are lots of reasons for me to like her. She’s about the same size I am. She hasn’t succumbed to plastic surgery. She’s around 40 and she’s never wanted to fit in. I don’t know if her success in porn shows popularity or she’s just that good of a performer. She is one of the most prolific female porn stars as well.
This site is very much a solo site about Joanna, but there are friends or guests too. The sex varies from heavy tease (my favorite) to all out hardcore sex (my least favorite). Joanna, despite her tiny frame, shows the strength and power of a confident woman. She does it without having to rely on stories and plots to show her strength.
The videos are mostly downloadable in 1080p and 720p, but there are some that can be downloaded in 4K.
There are picture sets, but those are not downloadable. The site is a back to the basics type site. There are four filters to separate the content. You have scenes, pornstars, tags and shop.
That is even simpler for me. I’m not interested in the friends or other pornstars. The tags aren’t helpful to me and I don’t think I’m interested in anything from the shop.
Joanna shows off some of her skills including tease and denial of a guy, not for sure if that’s her husband (he’s a pornstar) or not. The scenes with Joanna have near perfect chemistry and good tension. I had the same feeling with Burning Angel scenes as scenes from this solo site. If Joanna isn’t in the scene, I’m not interested in it.
There are no bonuses or extra content. You just get Joanna’s site and nothing else. I’m okay with that, but I think I’ve shown I’m a huge fan of Joanna.
She is considered one of the most important models of alt porn and is considered one of the pioneers of the genre. All while looking 25-30, when she’s really 40+. I take every scene she is in as her chance to impress the viewer. I don’t think she’s let anyone down very much. This site is required for those that are Joanna Angel fans. I would even say it’s better than Burning Angel, if you’re just in it for the Joanna content. |
|
06-11-23 03:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Alt Erotic
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been in an alternative mood lately and have to say, this may be one of the most underrated sites on the internet.
Very large site considering it’s a newer site. They have almost 500 videos and 500 photo sets.
1080p downloads for all videos.
Picture sets can be downloaded in high-resolution zip files
Gives new meaning to screwed, blued and tattooed.
No download limits and it’s 100% exclusive |
| Cons: |
As a fan of tattooed porn, I have said it before and continue to – do tattooed people never have regular sex or play sex games? It’s all hardcore at 120 MPH.
Missing a few pro favorites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Alt Erotica continues my alternative porn journey that included the great solo site of Joanna Angel. Burning Angel is likely the best known alternative porn site. Alt Erotica takes different spins at alt porn. There are the reality based scenes of a young woman going to get tattooed in a parlor, only to end up having sex with the tattooist, his friend and a cameraman or two. Sarcasm drips as I say the sacred sanctity of the tattoo parlor.
Am I the only one that has always wondered if sex happens in a tattoo parlor? I’m just wondering since this is the first site I’ve seen use the idea. The scenarios are believable at least to me they are. There’s a focus on women getting nude and opening their legs in front of strangers (tattooists). It’s good, I like it and it’s very believable.
The site as a whole is great. They have high quality downloads. No download limits, good navigation and it’s creative. The picture sets are good and are well-edited. You could look through a picture set and explain what’s going to happen in the video. It just feels like this site is ran by experienced professionals. No download limits, no gimmicky pricing, all exclusive content and other than a few exceptions – they have every hot and sexy tattooed model in porn on this site.
I don’t think I will ever know why all tattooed pornstars can only operate in fast, hardcore sex, but maybe it’s best that I don’t know. The biller continues to show the professionalism as they have billing by Epoch. They do send me emails every few months and offer a promo. They also offer a yearly promo around the holidays. I could see someone joining this as their primary or favorite site. It’s that unique and has quality in everything they do.
I think Alt Erotica is neck and neck with Burning Angel for the top tattooed hardcore site. I also believe Alt Erotica has better stories and premises than Burning Angel. It’s one of my favorite sites and if you’re remotely interested in tattooed models, it will probably be one of your favorites too. |
|
06-11-23 03:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Phew – that’s a lot of hot and sexy content!
Stunning downloadable videos
High quality throughout along with lots of goodies
Navigation works effortlessly and accurately
Photos are as high of quality as I have seen
Models are real, girl next door types and are all sexy |
| Cons: |
They are likely their own biggest competition and that never turns out well. You either top your previous work and make it lesser or you fail to top it and make your current work lesser.
The split videos |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls was “hardcore” to me back when I started perusing online porn. There are scenes with men with women and lesbian scenes too, but FTV’s strength is in the solo niche It surprises me how many times I have read someone complain about the site being named FTV which stands for First Time Video. There is little to no doubt that most of these models are filming their first ever porn scene. What I think happened, FTV carries a connotation of innocence and youth. FTV has one of the broadest age ranges for what is often advertised as a teen site. The Teen genre has stuck around so long that FTV now has a MILF site.
The girls next door style of models has been a forever strength of mainstream porn. That’s also a belief around FTV (all amateur, not true). There are some major porn stars on FTV.
The navigation cannot be praised enough. This is a massive collection, but you shouldn’t have any problems navigating the network.
This is what a typical scene wants to do and have you experience. A model meets up with the photographer. She takes pictures and does an interview style video where she answers some unique questions. She then works on her teasing ability and posing as well. That ultimately leads to the model masturbating. It’s beyond believable. A young woman teasing others and showing her body off suddenly decides to masturbate.
That is made better by the various toys FTV brings to the set. You’re going to see fingers and fists and multiple toys. All of which make guys wish they were the object or toy and makes women like myself, wonder why we didn’t try being with women.
FTV has taught me I do prefer simpler porn. These videos are based on a young woman doing something she most likely tried as her first sexual activity. The technical points of the site are easy to look over. The videos show a different woman (often less shy). I do believe that is one weakness of FTV. I do believe we as viewers fall into a mindset of what we think young, first time models do to themselves. Which in turn is a major strength.
On top of all the positives from above: The photos and videos are unlimited downloads. There’s so many examples of actions we would see as important to a successful porn site and those are right.
An easy 95 that could easily move up to 100. |
|
05-10-23 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As technically impressive transsexual site as you will ever find.
Unlimited video downloads and photoset downloads.
The videos have offered 4K downloads for nearly 6 years.
Even though the older videos have a lower resolution, they’re not poor.
One of the best sites for solo transsexuals
You can register through Paypal |
| Cons: |
Grooby seems to hold the rights to a lot of transsexual sites. This creates numerous problems I noticed.
Prices are outrageous in 2023 – nearly $40 a month |
| Bottom Line: |
Grooby is undoubtedly the biggest name in transsexual porn.The main problems that come from that are: Seemingly created their own supply and demand pricing. Can separate traanssexuals into more niches (Asian, Black, etc) to require the member to join multiple high priced sites just to see the different races of models. And if you’re like me and want to join multiple sites each month, you’re going to be spending near or even over $100 for 3 Grooby sites even if they give you a discount.
Business Philosophy aside, Grooby delivers exactly what they offer. Real, very attractive transsexuals masturbating and having sex. I like to use Nubiles.net in my comparisons to sites of other genres. Grooby is 99% like Nubiles. On paper, in numbers, in technical comparisons, very few if any sites can compete with them, but the action in the videos does not live up to the high standard the presentation creates. You also are getting standard porn – even if it is transsexuals. Nothing here is pushing the boundaries or moving the transsexual genre forward.
The good news is very few porn fans really care that much about those things. The bad news is the ones who do are usually reviewers. Only Nubiles.net calls for a review this objective. I have to look at Grooby as a site that the average member has never visited before joining. Like it’s their first ever porn site membership and they (the member) is without biases. When you view ths Grooby site that way it’s easily a 95 or higher. When you add subjectivity to the review, the score drops down to the low 80s. It’s just not that entertaining to someone who has joined over 100 sites.
They have provided 4K downloads for nearly 6 years and most everything else can be downloaded in HD. There are no download limits and the photosets are probably the highest quality transsexual photos I have seen. It’s just there are some missing elements I’m used to like some level of sexual tension (good kind). Instead, I’m just loaded down with tons of content that is mostly generic.
The action is either transsexual hardcore sex or solo. There’s not much variety there. Likewise, because Grooby has so many other sites, there’s not much difference in how the models look (race).
For me, this site or several combined Grooby sites could easily approach the 100 score, but just like with Nubiles.net there’s a little something extra that is missing. I’m going with a middle ground between 100 and 85 of 93. If you’re new to the site and porn in general, I could see you scoring it 98-100. |
|
04-12-23 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A truly enduring porn site that may get lost in the Met-Art network
Viv Thomas was one of the originators of internet, softcore, passionate female porn.
Updates several times per week.
There are over 5,000 videos and photosets.
Everything is downloadable, including HD videos and photosets.
That great navigation all Met-Art Network sites have. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes feel old, but may be just released. It has something to do with the camera or filter they use.
It has been noted before in my reviews and other reviews -- the male/female content has been removed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas hides itself well on the Met-Art Network. Nearly every site on the network is softcore or all-female. Viv Thomas was shooting heartcore porn before it became popular and this continues that tradition. I still do not know why they removed the male/female scenes, but it may have something to do with those videos being older and unable to remaster to 2023-quality standards.
Even without the male/female scenes you are getting very good solo and lesbian porn. It is a strange niche to focus on when talking about porn, but no one does passionate kissing better than Viv Thomas. If you like seeing two pretty women kissing each other to full arousal, you will not be disappointed in the content on Viv Thomas.
I won’t claim to know what Viv Thomas was trying in his heyday, but it does look like he tried to bring a softer, more passionate side to porn. Many of the older lesbian videos on Viv Thomas show my point. The women, often major star European models, lose all control and the scenes take on a real feel instead of porn feel. The kissing, touching, is a major part of Viv Thomas videos.
The navigation is the standard Met-Art Network navigation. You have easy to see, read and click tabs that take you to videos, photos, models list and so on. There are not only over 5,000 combined videos and photosets, but also 5, sometimes more, updates per week.
I usually join the site around the holidays as they have the $5 per month special promo. I’ve never been disappointed with the site or content.
I could probably nitpick and say the older scenes are much better than the newer ones, but I believe that is to be assumed and expected. The big difference could be that Viv is no longer producing the scenes or the talent was better back when he was. I'm going to go with a little of both.
Those into high production and action that feels and looks real, you should check Viv Thomas out -- you might agree that it’s at least in the discussion for best porn site. |
|
02-08-23 06:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Joined along with their site Girl Girl
Very good hardcore site
Easy to use and navigate
4K downloads on newer videos and 1080p or 720p also
Zip downloadable photo sets
Huge site with regular updates still coming |
| Cons: |
Hardcore sites usually bore me and this one did as well.
I mainly joined this to get access to Girl Girl.
Most if not all of the models are pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was joining Girl Girl and received an offer to add Jules Jordan. Both are owned and operated by the same company. It was a good deal for the two sites.
Jules Jordan content is similar to most hardcore sites and DVDs. There are some scenes with stories and plots, but nothing groundbreaking. The site’s biggest selling point is hardcore porn that’s not too hardcore and violent. I do know this can be a pro or con depending on the person: Nearly all or all of the models are pros. The reason I consider that a con is if you’ve been a member of other hardcore sites like Evil Angel, Backed, Tushy etc, the scenes here feature most of the same models and the action isn’t much different. The flip side of that is you do have pros performing and that means good performances (for porn). Personally, I prefer amateur models, especially females, but I knew what I was getting when I joined this site so I won’t deduct any points.
Their technical side is impressive with 4K downloads on all new scenes and even the older ones have 720p and/or 1080p, Their above average quality picture sets can be downloaded in zip files. The site packs in the quantity with over 10,000 scenes on over 2,500 DVDs. The videos are high quality in technical quality and the action is above average for a hardcore site.
You may want more from your hardcore scenes. The stories and plots are limited in scope and are usually just based on the niche (anal, oral, etc). The site is easy to use considering how big it is and the navigation works well.
Besides having over 10,000 scenes they have regular updates still coming in. I would list no bonus content as a con, but with the bundle I received, Girl Girl was included and I found it to be one of the best lesbian sites I’ve ever joined. They could work on adding some variety and improving storylines, but that’s not a big deal – in my opinion – to hardcore fans, which I am not.
I will compare it directly to Evil Angel and say I prefer the Jules Jordan hardcore scenes. But Jules Jordan doesn’t offer the variety of niches Evil Angel has. It’s a recommended site for hardcore fans. Just don’t expect anything amateur or homemade. |
|
01-10-23 02:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
43
|
Girl Girl
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality lesbian porn only letdown by no longer updating
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Picture sets are good and downloadable
Creative scenes that only make it worse that they’re not updating
Small site so it is easy to navigate
All models are knockouts |
| Cons: |
Less than 100 scenes and no longer updating.
I could see some complaining about it being too glossy and glam. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lesbian sites rarely impress me. It is a genre of porn that to me, all but makes itself successful. More than one naked woman in every scene. Women being naughty with other women. The only ones not into that are probably not looking for porn.
The bad news is pretty big. The site isn’t updating and hasn’t updated in over a year. That is a problem. It is still sold as a standalone site. If you are planning on joining the site for full price be aware that you will only get around 80 scenes and nothing else. The good news is that’s really all you can complain about with the site.
The models are cute, pretty, some innocent, all naughty. The clothing ranges from normal clothes to lingerie and the stories for the scenes are realistic enough. There is no download limits and the videos are all available in 4K downloads. There are the usual 1080p and 720p resolutions for downloads as well. The settings are pretty and classy looking. That may be a con to some people. It’s like a lesbian artsy site, but the action is very hardcore for lesbian. The picture sets are well-lit and can be downloaded.
Navigation is simple thanks to the small size of the site. You will have no problem finding what you’re looking for. If you lik glam porn you’ll love these scenes, but if not, you won’t likely like it.
Lesbian porn like this can be confusing. They do a good job of showing the scenes as classy, but the action is anything but classy. There are 69s, anal play, toys and fingers all in a 5 minute segment of a video. The kissing is good and a major focus. There’s very few things sexier than two pretty women kissing passionately.
I would have trouble recommending this site by itself. You would probably get your money’s worth, but if you can add Jules Jordan at a discounted price, it’s a better deal and is the deal I joined. The stories and scenarios add quite a bit of value to the scenes. I still have problems recommending it to anyone except lesbian fans. I really wish they would restart the site and add new scenes. It would be a site that easily pushes a high 90s score if it was still updating, but as it is, I feel comfortable giving it an 85. |
|
01-10-23 02:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Perv Therapy
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
No niche has been more overlooked in porn than mental therapy.
Around 40 scenes.
Includes access to 4 other sites.
*Warning Pro* My membership included downloads. I believe it depends on how you join (email, promo, directly).
Up to 4K downloads on the videos. Also includes HD downloads,
Easy cancel through Epoch |
| Cons: |
I expected cheesy plotlines, but instead received cheesy and corny.
Possibly have to abide by certain standards due to the sensitive nature of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
Imagine my excitement when I saw a porn site based on mental therapy. I then came back to reality and realized there are so many rules and regulations around the field it would likely be very limited in what all it covers. I have been working in the mental sciences for over 10 years and there has been more than one case of uncomfortable sexual tension in my office and nearly every therapist will tell you the same. There’s something about getting people to open up and talk about emotions that often leads right into sex.
With that said – this is porn and it’s made by the people at Team Skeet. That comes with some big positives like extremely high quality videos and pictures, but you will note my warning pro. I joined with no promo and am sure I paid a little more, but did receive downloading ability. The videos are downloadable up to 4K, but I only download the 720p or 1080p files. The videos are clear and well-lighted. That could have been a problem as some therapists keep their offices dark. The pictures are high quality and a nice, medium lighting/color.
You also receive access to these sites: This Girl Sucks, Teeny Black, CFNM Teens and My Babysitter’s Club. Each of those are good sites with pretty models and mostly cute and playful themes. I do believe each of those sites have been standalone sites before, but the updates have now either stopped or are rare. It is a good way to get access to these other sites.
What can you do with a perverted therapist site? Not a lot. More times than not, in real life, it’s the patient not the therapist that loses control of their emotions. Most of these scenes show the “mentally superior” therapist using their mental superiority to convince the younger patient to have sex with them. Not a complete miss since it is the first time I’ve seen porn try the therapy genre, but it’s not a hit, either. The scenes are reminiscent of most older/younger porn scenes. There’s no real (would be funny) seduction through therapy or even related to therapy. Still, good try and would like to see where they take this idea.
That can be a problem for this porn company. They have some really good ideas, but seem to be quick to give up on their ideas. This one is entertaining enough to keep an eye on it. The other 4 sites are worth mentioning for what they are – bonus add-on sites. I would recommend it to anyone that is interested in any of the included sites. |
|
11-28-22 02:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of gay sites
16 sites included with the network.
Newer videos have 4K downloads.
Unlimited downloads including photo set zips.
Over 8,000 videos and photo sets.
Still updating weekly |
| Cons: |
Several sites are no longer updating
If you’re a gay male you’ll probably love the content, but being a straight woman who likes to watch gay porn, there are not enough solo scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Next Door Studios is probably one of the best buys in the gay porn genre. You get 16+ sites, hot guys, up to 4K downloadable videos that are unlimited and downloadable photo zips. There are over 8,000 combined videos and photo sets. The navigation could be better or better yet, they could have more variety in the scenes so that better navigation is required.
It is my one complaint as a straight woman. There are not enough solo scenes. Figuring out how many is enough is difficult, but I do know there are not enough solo videos. Do the genders in porn work that way? Solo female porn is very common, but it’s just not that common in male porn.
I do believe and have talked about this before in reviews of gay sites, me being negative about lack of solo videos is probably a positive for gay males wanting to join the site.
The basis of this network is based around individual models, but they seemed to change that direction at some point. About half of the included sites are of individual gay male stars. The other sites play off the “next door” name like Next Door Male and Next Door Buddies.
It is difficult for me to judge the quality of performance since I’ve never been a part of gay male sex. It does seem like the majority of the scenes attempt to showcase the models’ looks and bodies as much if not more than the actual action. That makes it seem like solo scenes would be very popular.
The scenes are short on the stories, but if you know of gay porn with stories, you’ve been on sites I’m not familiar with. Most of these scenes are based on guy sees a guy he likes and they have sex. There’s no rhyme or reason or set reason/fetish for one wanting the other except for sex. I am guessing that is how gay porn fans prefer their porn, but I would like to see more stories and even explanations, maybe even some type of betrayal of a “straight” man being with a gay man and his girlfriend/wife catching them. Did I just do more with gay porn stories than the entire industry has done in 20 years? I think so. As much as we expect porn to evolve and keep up with the times, it’s kind of ironic to me that gay porn (males and lesbian) do not try going outside their genre. It seems like a gay sex scene turning into a bisexual scene or even more in group sex would be popular.
Either way, for standard gay porn Next Door Studios is one of the better values in terms of quality, quantity and value for your dollar. |
|
11-28-22 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large network of mostly teen hardcore porn.
More than 20 sites included.
Cute, pretty, almost exclusively slim and slender models.
The different sites work as the navigation. Each site covers a themed niche.
Newer videos are downloadable in 4K
Nearly daily update across the network. |
| Cons: |
When you’re pretty, sexy, slim, young, you don’t have to be a good actress!
The humor is often not meant to be humor. That’s a good con. |
| Bottom Line: |
This has been one of the most popular mega networks since I started joining porn sites. I’m going to lay out the main thought I have with the network. If you like slim, young, pretty, sexy young women you’re going to like this network. I don’t know if the niches or fetishes beyond looks even matter.
The technical parts of the network tick all the boxes. Up to 4K downloads. Zip files for picture downloads. HD videos if you don’t want the 4K ones. Navigation is simple thanks to the different sites working as categories or niches. They also are updating nearly daily. The price is cheap too.
The not as obvious major problem I have with the network is the languages and lack of subtitles and even attempting to act. Most of these models would be just as believable and interesting if they didn’t try to act.
Despite having the different niches and sites, there’s not a lot different between the scenes. That to me is the big negative. This is porn how porn used to be. The most important part is the looks and allure of the models. Different people will feel differently about that, but I am mentioning it despite a high score. This is one of those networks that you can see does everything right. The negatives are going to be different, more or even less per member. The first site I joined years ago was Nubiles.net. The content here reminds me of the hardcore content on Nubiles. That is a compliment in that the models are pretty and quality is high, but there doesn’t seem to be much chemistry between the people having sex.
The different sites and niches could also be improved. Most of these sites have the same style of porn on them with one slight difference – for example, creampies. Other sites have a different action that is excluded in the scenes on their other sites like anal sex. I beieve a network like this one does show the limitations on porn. You have a couple ways of making a successful porn site. One is with high quantity and quality. That’s what Teen Mega World is focused on. The models’ looks make up for the poor acting.
With all this said, I doubt I will join it again and that’s even with me rating it a 90. It’s just not what I look for in porn, but I know it’s what a lot of Porn Users do look for. Just be sure and check out the content before joining. |
|
11-28-22 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An oddly-addictive network that has had me as a member multiple times over the last few years.
Hardcore, lesbian and group sex. The group sex is the selling point for me.
Comes with 15 other sites.
Videos and pictures are downloadable and unlimited on downloads.
Weekly updates.
Down to Earth, women next door types. |
| Cons: |
I believe the looks of the models could be a con for some. Though not promoted as an alternative site, the women often dress alternatively and are tattooed.
No 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
Pegas Productions has a very underrated network on their hands. I decided to re-review it after I noticed I scored it only 77 on my previous review of it. The word underrated feels right now, but I could easily see some people using underwhelming. It’s mosly based on the looks of the women. You’re not going to see models that look like models. There’s not much glamour. I do believe that merges a fine line between believable hardcore and realistic hardcore. It always seemed a little bipolar to me to have those perfect 10 models posing then moments later having a dual penetration scene. You won’t see that on Pegas. Most of the women look like and act like they’re as much into the scenes as the men are.
This network could be a shining example of why we shouldn’t review a site or network after just one month of membership. I scored it a 77, but have been a member of it for four other memberships. I have warmed up to the content. I do believe it’s a perfect show of the models looks aren’t going to sell you on the network. It took me a little time and getting used to their shooting or filming style.
The video quality is excellent, but no 4K. There are 720p and 1080p downloads plus the photos are downloadable. The site is nearing 1,000 scenes and over 500 photo sets. Add to those the 15 other sites and you can see there’s a lot of content to keep you occupied and busy.
Of the other sites, I recommend these:
Kinky Frenchies, Fun Sized Teens, Inked Gurlz and Fresh and Innocent. Just like the overall content, it takes a little time to warm up to the different genres and niches, so give it some time. As an entire network, this is comparable to all the big and known networks. The added bonus is you haven’t seen more than a few of these models before and maybe, if like me, I’ve never seen these models on other sites. That goes into taking some time to warm up to the content. You start to realize this content is relatively obscure.
The navigation could be improved, but I also believe that’s subjective. It’s just not as easy to use as other similar networks. I found myself back-clicking several times which is never a good sign. It’s a good network and one I consider one of my favorites now as can be seen by the 13 point boost in my score. |
|
11-26-22 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
VIPissy
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Big, exclusive fetish site.
Over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and lots of sex and orgasms.
Up to 4K downloads and HD downloads.
Photos are clear and downloadable.
No download limits in new weekly updates. |
| Cons: |
Needs more focus on showing and explaining the pissing fetish. It’s much more complex than porn makes it seem to be.
Some scenes are disappointing just because the fetish seems to get forgotten. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember when I first talked to a pee fetishist. I was surprised to know that sound is a major part of the fetish. I didn’t say I’m going to explain it, but now that you know, it does make you question why sites like this one don’t point out the sound part. I also found out there’s a mixture of fetishists that cannot agree on their favorite part. Some like the model to be nude with legs spread while pissing, while others want her wearing pants that show the pee soaking the pants.
If none of this sounds interesting do not worry. I also don’t think any of that sounds interesting or arousing, but I really enjoyed this site. The site has over 500 scenes of teasing, pissing and hardcore sex, usually all in the same scene. It’s straightforward sex that aims to focus on the woman’s lower half of her body. I have noticed pissing fetishists also often like legs, hose and feet porn too. You will see those in these scenes. Which makes sense since the pee runs down the legs.
The sex is hardcore and as good as any site. And other than the focus on pissing for a few seconds in each scene, the porn is just a lot like any other porn. That’s why the pissing adds or subtracts to the content. For me, it adds to the content. Peeing is a private act that has been a fetish for hundreds of years due to the taboo of the act.
It also is a fetish that works with “porn” since it focuses on the pussy. It seems to be one of the most perfect fetishes for showcasing porn sex in it. The newer videos have 4K downloads and the videos have HD 1080p and 720p downloads as well. The pictures are downloadable in zip packs.
I did make a deduction for the lack of explanatory scenes. It seems like it would be easier for these fetish-type sites to make 8-10 videos that focus on showing the different arousal points of the fetish. As it is, I attempt to figure out the parts that arouse me more than the other parts. There could be more explanation about the different arousals based on the gender that is pissing, as example. I believe it would add immense value to the porn to understand the hows and whys of the fetish. They do everything else well enough. It’s a good value even by itself with no bonus content. |
|
11-26-22 05:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Cuck Hunter
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unexpected gem of a network.
Eight sites are included. Nearly all mainstream niches are covered.
High quality video downloads including 4K on newer videos.
Easy to use even though it could be easier.
Regular updates
Good download options. |
| Cons: |
It should advertise as a network. I’m reviewing the site I joined to gain access, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the network that comes with a membership.
The navigation will likely leave some wanting more features. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Cuck Hunter for my growing interest in the Cuckold niche, but ended up getting a network that is much better than I expected. Cuck Hunter is exactly what I expected. It’s a standard cuckold site where the wife has sex with another man while her husband and/or cuck watches. It’s a niche beyond a niche. There’s something highly erotic about the cuck watching and masturbating.
If cucks aren’t an interest to you there are 7 more sites and varied niches including transsexuals, nude athletic scenes, lesbian and light exhibitionism.
The network is full of surprises like the 4K video downloads. It has nearly 2,200 scenes across the network and all can be downloaded with no limits. If I felt any disappointment, it was that there weren’t more cuckold scenes. Being a relatively scarce niche makes finding quality scenes like a treasure hunt, and I would trade 1,000 of the videos for 100 more cuckold scenes. I like the different niches they cover, but maybe it’s just me – I sign up for a site or network because the niche interests me.
The most important pro may also be the most important con. The blends of different niches is a good change of pace, but only transsexual is covered in-depth with over 500 scenes. Each of the niches have at least 80 scenes with all but one having at least 100 or more scenes. That is a pro and con. It may not be enough of a niche if you’re new to it, and if it’s one you don’t like, 100+ scenes is a lot to just look over and not download.
For me, this network is excellent and I enjoy the varied niches, but I would warn against joining it just for one niche. This one works better if you like multiple niches they have. Transsexual has never been a favorite of mine, but I do like it and they have some very good transsexual scenes. I like and downloaded a little from each niche.
I believe this network is good for those that aren’t interested in the mainstream niches of porn and want something different. If nothing else you can try out niches that a lot of people are comfortable joining like transsexual and cuckold. The video quality is good all across the network. Th main change they could make to improve the sites and network is putting them all into one network. Otherwise, I believe they are asking for too many unfair complaints from those that join for one specific niche only to find out the amount of content for the niche is limited.
Overall, I highly recommend the network as long as you’re sure you want something different. |
|
11-06-22 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Slayed
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Erotic lesbian porn that’s not as nice as typical lesbian porn
Videos can be downloaded and all scenes have up to 4K downloads
Can be combined into a 7 site package deal for a good price.
Pretty and sexy models
Scenes are fun and have good production
Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
There is a download limit, but as of right now, the small size of the site makes the limit not a problem.
The small size of the site makes it questionable in value, but if you buy the 7 site bundle, the deal is a lot better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the 7 site bundle and will just fil-in what is included with it. Besides Slayed, you also get Deeper, Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. The studio that owns this group of sites – Mad Cheddar – believes in several things. To start with, all their sites have the 25 downloads per week download limit. All their sites feature high production values and well, that’s not always a good thing. The bundle of sites does offer a broad range of genres and fetishes. The price for the 7 site bundle is $49.95. Slayed Is the newest of the Mad Cheddar sites and it is the only lesbian Mad Cheddar site. I’m going to say it’s not the best lesbian site I have joined, but it is a lot better than the lesbian sites you receive with the average porn network. It is a little kinkier and more hardcore than the sensual lesbian sites, but it still has high sensuality. I would like to see more group scenes, but this studio doesn’t do much with groups. The models are all very pretty and sexy. It’s a common problem, I think, with lesbian porn to want better camera angles. Lesbian porn is the one genre that could really benefit from multiple camera downloadable files. An important part of the Slayed scenes is the believable sexual tension between the models. I think lesbian porn is the easiest to fake, but I don’t feel like these scenes are faked, There is passion and lust in every scene. I don’t know if the producers allow the models to ad-lib, but the kinkiest parts of the scenes appear unplanned.
The download limit is acceptable to me, but that is pertaining to Slayed only. The site has under 80 scenes. With the 25 scene weekly download limit you can still download every video on Slayed in a month membership. As for the value of the site/network, as a site, it would be good for a one month membership. As a network, it is more up to the person, to decide if the 7 sites are worth $50. From my side of it, I think it’s overpriced at $50. I’m not that big of a fan of any of their sites except Slayed and Deeper. For me, it would be more sensible to just join those two.
There is a problem to me that will almost always land in the pros. The high production values. The problem with this studio is you get the samey feeling not just from scene to scene on the same site, but even across the different sites. I also believe that works against joining the 7 site bundle.
With all that said, Slayed is a great site for lesbian fans and the quality is excellent. I just don’t think the Mad Cheddar bundle is worth the price of it. I have joined Deeper twice before and really enjoy it. The other sites – minus Slayed – are too much of the same thing for my taste. These sites pigeonhole themselves and their creativity with the genres and sticking to them. It seems to be the biggest mistake I see in porn. Sex is rarely the same, but a lot of the Mad Cheddar scenes are exactly the same. |
|
11-06-22 06:27pm
Replies (0)
|
|
