| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Great!! Sorry that I didn't figure this out by myself. Users like me are probably the reason guys like you make the big bucks (;-)
Thanks again Rick. I look forward to consulting your site in the future.
BB20
|
08-22-07 08:51pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thanks for the reply Rick. OK, I think that I understand you and I accept that you are dedicated to helping users find sites that will appeal to them.
The only point that I made that I think you might have missed was the one in which I suggested that the site be ranked by the user rater's scores only and not by your appointed reviewers. I referred to amazon.com which rates their products by the number of purchases that have been made by customers on their site. They provide professional reviews but list the reviews by the number of 'stars' that their customer/reviewers assign to the products not by an arbitrary ranking by their staff. These reviews then become 'owned' by their users (a good thing for both users and site owners I believe).
I wish you and your staff the best and hope that you provide us 'porn users' with a useful service. This will of course be based upon your service getting it right when pointing us to the 'good' sites and not keeping us away from sites that we might prefer by giving us bad advice. That means that you and I have the same goal and I'm just asking a question about implementation.
Cheers,
BB20
|
08-22-07 08:26pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I appreciate your attempt to make scoring more representative of reality but there is a downside to this as well. I reviewed a site specifically because I thought that the official review was dated if not 'way off the mark.' I am not a professional critic nor do I wish to become one. Just browsed your site and found a review that I really disagreed with. I did a review of my own in order to right what I considered a review that could mislead viewers and cause them to not consider a site that I considered the best of its' kind.
If viewers continue to read all reviews and not just go with the official score there will be no problem. But if viewers read an official score and take it as reason to steer away from a site that is 'best of class' then I believe that it defeats the reason for your site.
Perhaps official scores should be given in a commentary form only and the official score left to the customer reviewers (the Amazon model). It wouldn't be perfect but probably better than the alternative. If you find an obvious shill deal with it directly.
Good luck. I'll be looking to see if your reviews help me or not in the future.
|
08-22-07 03:33pm
|
Review
4
|
Gay Teen Studio
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is my personal favorite site featuring 18-25 year old boys. The producers obviously carefully select their models by taking into account the preferences of their users. Ongoing forums allow for user input (both positive and negative) and the results are evident in the selection of models and the poses that are produced. The models are very attractive in the main and most seem to enjoy themselves while being photographed. I have noticed continued improvement of the site over time. |
| Cons: |
The site is easy to navigate and download from. There is an arbitrary rule that limits downloads for "new" members that is irritating. I have never been able to download 'over the limit' since I have been a member, although I have had a couple of the longest subscriptions allowed. This is however an annoyance and not a deal breaker.
Although I complement the photographers on doing a great job, on a few occasions they have over done it artistically by posing boys with fruit, knives etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend this site to anyone who enjoys photographs of nude young men posed in a variety of artistic poses. The models are of professional quality and not just kids off the street. The producers obviously take time with their models and they look well groomed but not "made up."
The sex in the photographs appears natural and relaxed most of the time and the models look as though they enjoy getting off for the camera. Photographers also tend to add shots for most tastes: faces, pits, tits, feet, legs, ass cracks and holes, as well as the usual cocks and balls.
Movies have been recently added and they are of the same high quality as the photos. Even the sound on the movies is more interesting than the usual grunts and squeals that many of us have become use to on other sites.
I enjoy the forums, slide shows, light box (users own group of photos), and rating system. All in all this is the best teen boy site on the web to the best of my knowledge and I highly recommend it to all of you that have an interest in good looking boys and a high quality presentation. |
|
08-04-07 10:55am
Replies (0)
|
|
