Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1951-1975 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1951
Visit Lubed

Lubed
(0)
Reply of mcb80295's Reply

You're making it difficult for me to avoid joining... :-)

05-17-16  09:23am

Reply
1952
Visit Lubed

Lubed
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

I agree, but I think I'm part of the problem. I've joined several of these Porn Pros mini-sites knowing that they'd be small with few updates but did it anyway. So as much as I dislike this model with enough fools like me to make it worthwhile they'll continue to pop up.

And like you, I like the looks of what this site has to offer.


04-25-16  05:34pm

Reply
1953
Visit Magic Porn

Magic Porn
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Great review. I wouldn't consider myself a video 'snob' by wanting decent quality, but this stuff from years ago just doesn't cut it anymore. Like you, I wouldn't download anything with this low a resolution unless it was something I really, really wanted.

09-18-12  04:22am

Reply
1954
Visit Make Teen Gape

Make Teen Gape
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Thanks for the review. This sounds like a network that I'd like so I may join. At least I know the weak spots before opening my wallet.

08-28-11  10:43am

Reply
1955
Visit Male Strippers Unlimited

Male Strippers Unlimited
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review

Excellent review, as always. You know you're dealing with a weird site when they actually apologize for the fact that they make it difficult to download photos and that many of the vidoes are crap.

12-09-12  07:02am

Reply
1956
Visit MaleJunction Videos

MaleJunction Videos
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

If you don't do it now, I'd highly recommend going to the parent website of this one before joining any site. The Best Porn has a ton of good information so even if the site you wanted to join was hiding the fact that it was streaming only the staff at TBP would let you know that. Same with things like download limits and DRM. The reviews at PU usually don't go into the technical detail that they do at TBP. TBP and PU are the only source I use and trust on internet porn.

As for the gay site reviews, there are certainly several gay guys posting here now so maybe it will reach a critcal mass and really take off. Here's hoping. It will make this site more thorough.


08-01-11  05:13pm

Reply
1957
Visit MaleJunction Videos

MaleJunction Videos
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review

It surprises me that there are sites that offer streaming only. I might be wrong, but I'd guess that most people want to have something to show for the money they spend. But maybe with the rise in things like iPhones, iPads, iPods, Playbooks, etc there is a market for people who only want to stream.

And not to sound patronizing or anything because I'm not meaning it that way, but it's good to see gay porn getting some attention from members. PU seems to have a pretty diverse membership but the gay community was definitely keeping a low profile for a long time.


08-01-11  01:22pm

Reply
1958
Visit Marie McCray

Marie McCray
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, I heard those stories about her later days in the business. She always seemed like a model who had here head screwed on pretty straight. Some girls seem flaky right from the beginning and Micah wasn't like that.

08-22-12  05:09pm

Reply
1959
Visit Marie McCray

Marie McCray
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Interesting... I wouldn't have pegged Marie as a BDSM model. But I've had other surprises like that too. Seeing Micah Moore in some BDSM was a bit of treat too.

08-21-12  03:26pm

Reply
1960
Visit Marie McCray

Marie McCray
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

You're probably right. Most of her stuff is fairly tame and she doesn't do anal either. I was really surprised to see her in a scene on Device Bondage.

08-20-12  05:38pm

Reply
1961
Visit Mary Alicia

Mary Alicia
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

I'm mixed on it. I don't like it because I'd like to see it, but it does add to her allure. I suspect that for straight versus gay porn it might be different though since vaginas are pretty much all alike whereas penises are quite differnt from guy to guy. A solo female model could do this, but I doubt a solo male model could get away with it.

11-05-11  06:23pm

Review
1962
Visit Mary Alicia

Mary Alicia
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very good-looking, natural model
- Site appears to update (but that may end – see below)
- Supports download managers
- Simple design
- Pics and vids available
- Pics available as zips
- Bills through CCBill
Cons: - Not full nudity (T+A only)
- The website doesn’t do the model justice
- Resolutions for photos and videos are poor
- Small site
- Material seems to be removed periodically
- Not a good value
- Many (25+) dead links
- No options for files sizes or types
Bottom Line: First let me get this out of the way: I joined this site because I like Mary Alicia’s look. She’s petite, small breasts, beautiful bum, beautiful face (with freckles!), and captivating eyes. I have no complaints about Mary Alicia herself. The website, however, needs work.

I can’t tell how old the site is because it appears that not all material is kept on the site. There is a link for ‘archived galleries” where older sets are listed. That’s not a bad idea, but since you can’t actually access those sets what’s the point? Server space is pretty cheap these days, and the whole site has less than 5GB on it, so why remove material? The site reports that at any given time there are between 70 and 100 photo sets available, though there are closer to 200 now, which is a mix of updated sets and older sets.

I can say with some certainty that the site has been around since at least 2002 since one gallery announced that it was number 900 since that year. That also means that Mary Alicia may be pushing 30 now, but she doesn’t look it.

The site does appear to update, though not on a set schedule. The sets are dated by month and day, but not by year so it is impossible to tell how old the sets are.

Within each picture set there are varying numbers of photos, though to have more than 50 photos in a set is rare. The sets are described on the site, but the set name is non-descriptive so if you find some sets you like you’ll have to rename them on your own. The pictures are available as singles or as a zip file. The biggest letdown for the photos is the quality of the images. The resolutions would be considered acceptable by standards a few years ago but by today’s standards they’re barely average. The best resolution I could find on the site was 968x1400. Most are 968x1300. Maybe I’m asking for too much by wanting a higher resolution. It is also possible that the photos were taken some years ago and were high res then.

Videos are available though the problem with most of them is the camera. Apparently Mary Alicia does (did?) a regular webcast and most of the videos are simply captures of those webcasts. The resolution on those is just 320x240 at 140kb/s. There are a handful of videos that are posted at 640x480 at 2100kb/s, but those are rare. Several of the videos are just slideshows of photos. There are less than 40 videos on the site.

For all the photos and videos there are no options for files sizes. For videos, the only format is wmv.

One choice that Mary Alicia has made will likely limit her audience. This is definitely a softcore site. While there are other women on the site, there is only posing. Don’t look for hot girl-on-girl action here. And don’t expect to see Mary Alicia’s naughty bits either. I can understand a choice to not do b/g or g/g sex on camera, and I can even understand an unwillingness to do ‘spread shots,’ but if she’s gone this far, it seems odd to not let us have a peek at the Holiest of Holies. While I don’t understand it, I can admit that it actually does add something to her mystique.

The site itself is very simple, but it doesn’t need to be complex. There are links to photos and videos on separate pages. That’s pretty much it. There are ‘bonus’ links too, where Mary Alicia has a forum, some FAQs, and a few more photoshoots.

This site’s updating days may be coming to and end. Mary Alicia posted a message recently stating that she is pregnant and hasn’t yet decided if she will continue. If she doesn’t, I hope the site continues as she is a very beautiful model. If she does, the guys with a pregnancy fetish may want to take note. I’ll admit that it is entirely possible that this is outdated information as no years are given with the updates. She could have been pregnant two years ago for all I know.

So would I recommend this site? I would if you meet a certain criterion: if you go to the tour page and find that Mary Alicia is just your type (as was the case for me) then go ahead and join. With CCBill as the biller, you can be confident in security and ease of cancelling. At least you can go in informed and knowing the site’s limits. I don’t want to downplay this as an option: Mary Alicia is VERY good looking and I’m sure many people would agree with that. I certainly don’t regret taking a membership, but I wish there was more material. If, however, you prefer a different look in your models, then don’t bother. The site’s design and limitations wouldn’t make it worth your while to open your wallet.

11-05-11  08:55am

Replies (2)
Reply
1963
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Interesting review - thanks for posting it. This was one of my favourite sites on the network. It may have been that I only downloaded certain scenes, but I don't remember the focus being on big-breasted women. And I say that as someone who considers anything above a B cup to be be big breasted, so maybe you're a lover of small breasts too.

I was surprised at how well done the site was because it could easily be boring but it isn't. I'm not familiar with fuckedhard18 and have never had a membership there, but based on your comments I've added it to my list of sites to join. Thanks for that tip.

One thing about the site and the whole network that was a personal dislike was the lack of anal sex. One the whole network there are probably less than a dozen anal scenes. No big deal for someone who doesn't like or is indifferent to anal, but for an anal fan, it is definitely noticable by its absence.


10-09-11  05:44am

Reply
1964
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)
Reply of Capn's Reply

I agree, but most networks usually have a couple of sites that tickle my fancy and I suspect that is the case with most subscribers. With this network, I joined for Jurassic Cock and everything else was just gravy. So I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of the 'gravy' was pretty damn good.

For me, a lot of it comes down to price. If I'm joining a network for one site then the price better be reasonable. Sometimes, as in this case, the price was very reasonable when I discovered Massage Creep.

Now if they could just persuade the girls to do more anal...


05-23-11  04:49pm

Reply
1965
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

I agree. I don’t think I downloaded anything with the fake penis. And don’t forget that there are several sites that rely on huge quantities of fake cum. At least they use so much of it that they aren’t even trying to hide the fact that it is fake. But for its few shortcomings, I was surprised at how good some if it is. Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep really impressed me. They could stand alone. 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18 and Teen BFF are also quite good. I downloaded everything from Public Violations, though it is all staged and most of it is quite silly. And not having an anal-themed site is unusual for a network.

05-18-11  03:21am

Review
1966
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly
Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review.

I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much.

But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is.

The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session.

While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite.

This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great.

One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene.

If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites.

05-17-11  08:10am

Replies (4)
Comment
1967
Visit Massage Parlor

Massage Parlor
(0)

Some stats on the site

The site currently has 220 videos and updates several times per week.

A membership here gives you a membership to three other massage-themed sites with over 730 massage videos and regular updates. If you’re interested, what I wrote when reviewing Nuru Massage applies to this site too.

07-05-12  06:47pm

Replies (0)
Reply
1968
Visit Massage Rooms

Massage Rooms
(0)
Reply of Willard's Reply

Willard - I liked your comment very much. I wrote about the one that you called "Their server is very delicate"

03-01-14  08:05am

Reply
1969
Visit Massage Rooms

Massage Rooms
(0)
Reply of Willard's Comment

Willard, I mean no disrespect by this, as I suspect that English is not your first language, but the way you both wrote and formatted that comment made it very poetic. I think this was one of the best posts we've had in a long time!

02-27-14  03:16pm

Review
1970
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large catalogue of DVDs and scenes
- Rarely served niches available here
- Huge range of tags for sorting scenes
- Access to many older titles
- TBP/PU discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Very little HD material offered
- Most scenes are low resolution
- Over-reliance on compilations
- Scenes aren't linked with the DVD where they appear
Bottom Line: The last time I reviewed this site I scored it fairly high and I saw it as more of a network with a collection of sites. Now, three years later, I’m rethinking both of those positions. I’ve scored it lower because it now does more wrong than right, and when a ‘network’ also offers one main site where all their material is available I now view those niche ‘sites’ as being more like tags for sorting.

I really don’t recall what the site looked like or how it was laid out three years ago when I was last a member but it now comes across as wanting to be a competitor to Videobox. If that’s true it misses the mark by a wide margin. MA has many of the weaknesses of VB without having any of its strengths.

The site currently has 7,475 DVDs uploaded. They also show 39,745 scenes as being available. For a DVD-based site they have a serious flaw in that if you open a scene it isn’t linked in any way to the DVD where it’s from and there is no information the DVD either. It appears that all the scenes are on DVDs but I can’t say that for certain. I wouldn’t join on the expectation that you’ll get access to the DVDs AND get access to a lot of scenes too. I don’t think the site works that way though it isn't obvious. (I also have to admit that while it appears that all the scenes offered in the niche sites are taken from DVDs on the main site I can’t be certain that they all are. The way all the sites are structured makes that determination impossible. The effect may be that the site looks much larger than it really is.)

While the numbers of DVDs (and/or scenes) is impressive they only have 140 DVDs in HD. Where no HD is offered there are four resolutions of MPEG4 files available and listed as bitrates: 2000, 750, 500 and ‘portable.’ For the few HD scenes here those are offered as 1080 and 720 (1920x1080 6000kb/s and 1080x720 4000kb/s, respectively). The highest bitrate scenes in SD come in at 640x480 and 2000kb/s. To be fair MA has access to a lot of older porn from the 1990s and 2000s (which I see as a great asset for the site) so I can’t expect a lot better, but when VB uploads two HD DVDs per day MA looks to be lacking. Don’t join here expecting a lot of quality because you won’t find it. (Of the scenes 39,745 only 2020 are in HD.)

Updates are another area where MA is lacking. But with the way the site doesn’t link scene selections with the DVDs they’re from it can be a little hard to tell. If sorting by DVD it appears that a DVD hasn’t been added in almost three months but when sorting by scene the update schedule is better. There doesn’t appear to be a regular update schedule but it appears that at least one scene is added per week and in some cases two scenes may be added per week. When you contrast that with VB’s upload of five DVDs per day MA comes up short.

One weakness that this site and VB share is an over-reliance on compilations. It’s less acute here at MA but it is still obvious.

MA has a broad tag system for selecting scenes with approximately 115 niches tagged.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links timing out, though with the file sizes being so small that shouldn’t be an issue anyway. I also found no download limits were imposed.

One advantage that MA has over its competition is that they offer porn in a lot of niches that aren't widely available on other similar sites. For example, they offer a lot of black-themed titles. Not interracial, but actually black-themed. Also, there is what I would call ‘senior porn.’ Not old men fucking young women or vice versa, but actually titles where all the talent is older. Finally, the site offers some gay material too, which seems odd on a straight-oriented site.

The bottom line is that I’d only recommend this site to get access to some specific titles or studios that aren't offered elsewhere. Other than that this site comes up short in more ways than it succeeds. While it offers a low price through TBP/PU that low price isn't enough to offset the low resolutions for most of the videos. If you’re looking for an all-you-can-eat-buffet approach to porn you’re better off joining Videobox. VB is a much better value for your porn dollars.

12-13-14  01:20pm

Replies (0)
Reply
1971
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

When I can't see everything that a site has to offer it usually makes me suspicious. What do they have to hide? And for me, it is often finding a few stars or scenes that I've been looking for that will tip the balance to me joining. I really hate it when a site (especially a large one) has a couple of generic tour pages and then drops you at a join page. I suspect sites like Videobox wouldn't be so successful if they had a tour page that told a prosepctive member that they had thousands of DVDs and then expect you to join on that alone. What harm can full access to see a site do?

11-23-11  06:02am

Reply
1972
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

Good news on the updating pricing. I agree that a better preview would be a good idea, but at the discounted price you really can't go wrong. I figured all I really wanted was access to one site so the rest woudl be gravy.

11-21-11  06:11pm

Review
1973
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large collection of sites
- Extremely diverse for a mainstream network
- TBP / PU discount (see note below and my comment from November 18, 2011)
- Multiple formats / resolutions available
- Streaming available
- Supports download managers
- Decent download speed
- Seems to be updating
- Good value
Cons: - Doesn’t bill through one of the better known billers (Safebilling)
- Many older videos aren’t offered in multiple formats
- Optimistic in reporting number of scenes and some scene resolutions
- Photos are not available as zips
- No anal-themed site
Bottom Line: I’m not normally a fan of mega-sites, but the discount on this one made it interesting and I wanted access to a few of the niche sites so it made sense to join. My overall impression is that it is a good site, but it over-promises and under-delivers. Not by much, and not enough for me to tell you to avoid it, but it does have some weaknesses.

It is a large network with a reported 107 sites on the covering the broadest range of fetishes I’ve ever encountered. The majority of the sites are b/g hardcore though there are scenes featuring BBWs, Black BBW, fucking machines, animated porn, food sex, midgets, MILFs, women over 60 and hairy women. There are also 13 sites featuring transsexuals. Interestingly, there are five sites of gay scenes too, which I don’t think I’ve ever seen on a primarily straight network, but given the broad range of interests they cover these don’t really seem out of place. If there could be a complaint about the diversity of sites it might be that it’s trying to be too diverse. I joined to get access to some relatively mainstream porn with attractive young lasses doing nasty things. Each midget scene (no offence meant to those of less stature) means one less scene with a more mainstream interest. The one ‘niche’ missing is anal sex. There are anal scenes scattered around, but no anal site.

You can select a tab that tells you how many scenes are in each site but unless I’m missing something their counts seem wildly optimistic. Matrix Models, for example, boasts of 1726 scenes but I only see a little over 300. That’s not bad, but to be off by a factor of six seems a bit odd. Other sites show the same optimism when giving stats on the number of scenes. It isn’t that big a deal though because there is still a lot of material here.

Videos can be streamed in three qualities and in many cases in HD. I didn’t use the streaming so I can’t comment on it. Most videos can be downloaded in either wmv or MPEG4 format. MPEG4s are offered in several resolutions, ranging from iPod quality to HD (320x210, 540x500, 640x480 and 1280x720). I prefer wmv format and most videos are offered in that format at a decent, though not stellar, resolution. One issue I have is that like the number of scenes in each site, the resolutions reported for some wmv files are a bit optimistic. I checked this with several files to make sure I just didn’t stumble on a lone file in a vast collection and found it repeatedly: the site says you’re downloading a 720x540 video but what you’re getting is 640x360 at 2100kb/s. That isn’t a huge difference, but it is enough to be noticeable and it is misrepresenting the file. I don’t download mp4 or MPEG4s usually and I didn’t much of those here either but with the MPEGs that I did download they seemed to more accurately labeled for file size.

One beef I had was that a lot of the older videos with stars I like to collect were not available in wmv format. The vast majority of material is offered in wmv – it’s mostly the stuff that was made a decade or more ago.

Pictures are also available, but they aren’t available as zips so I didn’t download any. They appeared to be mostly screencaps.

A lot of the content here is not exclusive. I found many scenes that I have from various well-known porn DVDs. If you have a huge collection of porn, particularly DVD porn, you’ll likely find some overlap. But… there is still a lot of material here but I don’t think much of it is actually exclusive. If I’m wrong I hope someone corrects this in a comment.

I’m not saying that this is good or bad, but a lot of the scenes had a watermark from Porn.com. I’m not familiar with that site but Googling it makes me think it’s a tube site. I don’t know if that is true or not, but Massive Access is definitely a membership driven site. I have no idea what, if any, connection exists between the sites.

The site appears to updating with new scenes added daily. I see in his earlier review here that Robbi81 stated that he thought the dates of scenes were being manipulated to give the impression that the site was updating when it isn’t. He didn’t explain that comment, but I have no reason to believe that the site is dormant. Even if I’m wrong, the site is worth a membership given the price and size.

Speaking of price, neither TBP or PU mention a discounted price on the Massive Access page. I’m not sure if there is a discount if you join through the main network page but I joined through one of the specific sites, My Stepdaughter Ate My Ass (yes, I’m a pervert, but so are you!) and was offered a discount that gave me access to what appears to be everything. Even if it isn’t everything, it’s still a great value.

For the few flaws the network has I’d still recommend it because at the TBP/PU discount it’s a good value. The videos aren’t exclusive and they resolutions aren’t great, but there is a lot of interesting porn here.

11-21-11  04:34pm

Replies (4)
Comment
1974
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(0)

Network Pricing

The page here and at TBP doesn't mention any discount so I'm not sure if there is one offered if you join through the main network page. I joined through My Stepdaughter Ate My Ass and got a $9.99 price that seems to give me full network access. If I learn otherwise later I'll add a comment. But it seems that the way to join is through one of the sites that offers the discount.

11-18-11  06:43am

Replies (0)
Reply
1975
Visit Mature Reality

Mature Reality
(0)
Reply of Onyx's Reply

Thanks! I will.

02-19-18  04:34pm


Shown : 1951-1975 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.