| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1751
|
Horror Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I can't see horror porn or monster porn catching on in any big way. Anal sex has it's own draw because it is still seen as naughty and somewhat taboo but it still doesn't require a lot of external stuff. A couple who wants to experiment with anal sex needs some lube and some patience. A couple wanting to role play a horror scene might need a wee bit more.
I'll confess that I may be just rambling because I like anal scenes but, like you, have no attraction to horror porn. In fact, apart from not having an attraction to it I'm somewhat repelled by it. I remember years ago there was a scene in a JM Productions title (which I forget) where someone was dressed in a gross looking monster costume and had sex with a woman. That scene ruined the whole DVD for me.
I wonder if this has something to do with the current interest in vampires and other things like that. Maybe it isn't such a stretch to combine sex and porn with something else you're interested in. Take me, for example. I'm jolly interested in women's beach volleyball and I'd welcome a way to combine that with sex.
|
01-21-19 02:54pm
|
Comment
1752
|
Horror Porn
(0)
|
|
12-21-17 01:41pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
1753
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Nubiles family
- A-list models
- Plot-based scenes
- Conventional B/G porn
- Streaming and downloads in five resolutions each
- Screenshots available
- Logical site, options to sort and search scenes
- 56 scenes (currently)
- Updates weekly |
| Cons: |
- 100% POV, and not great POV either
- Not part of the Nubiles Network
- Some ads, but not overly obtrusive |
| Bottom Line: |
Hot Crazy Mess is a relatively new addition to the Nubiles family of sites. Unfortunately, it isn’t part of the larger Nubile networks but is a stand-alone site. However, thanks to a generous 50% TBP/PU discount the site still offers great value.
HCM offers fairly generic porn – but I don’t mean that in a negative way. There are obviously porn sites that serve specific niches that exist on the fringes but a vast majority of porn watchers and collectors still prefer mainstream scenes. While these are mainstream scenes they do all have a common theme, namely the plot has the female models perhaps making some bad choices.
All of the scenes are plot-based and those plots follow the overall theme set by the site name. Interestingly, the site has made a choice to include a brief description of the plot set up at the beginning of each scene. Personally, I like to this approach. While the plots are all based around the loose theme of the female model making some bad choices (snooping on a family member’s laptop, attempting to steal a dog from an ex-boyfriend or cheating on a boyfriend with his best friend, for example) the most common plot theme on the site revolves around the step-siblings (there are some step-daughter/step-father scenes too). I guess that’s just low-hanging fruit for porn these days. But, it’s a niche that I quite like even though I know there are others who avoid it.
As with most plot-based porn the plot is merely there to get the scene started. Martin Scorsese isn’t writing scripts for this or other sites. Once the thin veneer of plot is set the scene simply becomes fairly generic B/G porn. This isn’t a criticism of the site and shouldn’t be read as such. I prefer a bit of a plot, especially one that explains why the two people are getting together and creates some sexual tension between them. HCM delivers on these expectations.
As with all other Nubiles sites the models don’t have a huge amount of variety. This is absolutely not a problem for me since I join their sites specifically to see scenes with younger, petite models. It’s also worth noting that most of the models here would be considered A-list. They are the who’s who of young, petite porn stars active today. One bit of good news is that there is some variety in that there are some scenes featuring Asian and Black models. Those scenes still make up only a minority but they do appear more frequently than on other competitive sites.
There are currently 56 videos uploaded and a new one is added each week.
Both streaming and downloads are available in five resolutions (480×270, 644x360, 960x540, 1280×720 and 1920x1080). Bitrates are good and the scenes look good with no pixilation or stuttering. Frame rates are 30fps. There is also a “theatre mode” and while I tried that I can’t really determine what it’s value is. But it is reasonable to say that whether you prefer streaming or downloads there is something for everyone.
The site is logically laid out, which isn’t too hard to do with a new and relatively small site. The scenes can be sorted by upload date and model. There are also tags to help you drill down further into anything specific.
There are some ads at the beginning as you login and some at the bottom of each page but they aren’t overly obtrusive.
Screenshots are also available as singles or as zips. Those come in at 1920×1080.
I had no issues using a download manager to queue up the scenes I wanted to download. I also found that download speeds were on par with similar sites meaning that they were quite fast. I didn’t encounter any throttling or download limits.
The only serious negative I found (and this may be partly subjective) is that the scenes are all shot in POV. I’m not a big fan of this style but I can live with it as long as it is well done. Unfortunately, this isn’t well done. I found that in all scenes there is a lot of camera shake and the cameraman, who is also engaged in sex, sometimes moves and loses the shot. I’m sure shooting good POV is very difficult so it seems to me that the remedy is to have a cameraman shoot the scene. This could be a big improvement for the site.
A minor negative is that it would be nice if it was part of the Nubiles network but I can certainly understand why it isn’t. Besides, the discount offered makes this an excellent value.
The bottom line is that while this is generally pretty middle-of-the-road porn it’s very good middle-of-the-road porn and it aims right into a big part of the market. Unless you are looking for an unconventional niche you will likely be happy with a membership at the site. This site is well worth considering if you like young, petite models in (mildly) plot-based porn scenes. Just be aware that all the scenes are POV and have a lot of camera shake and other issues involving the cameraman doing two important things at the same time. |
|
10-23-19 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1754
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I agree that this should have an introductory price until it grows. $25 USD is a lot for 18 videos. But... it also has a lot of models I really like. A fool and his money are soon parted. I suspect I'll take the plunge soon.
|
01-20-19 02:30pm
|
Reply
1755
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Hotmovies's Reply
Much appreciated! This is exactly what I was looking for.
|
09-04-12 05:10pm
|
Comment
1756
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
|
08-28-12 02:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1757
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
|
06-10-09 02:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1758
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
kalo's Reply
I hope that the webmaster changes this policy someday. I'd rejoin if he did.
|
09-23-12 01:48pm
|
Reply
1759
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Reply
I didn't know this company had other sites. I'd be interested in some of it if it could be downloaded.
|
08-08-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
1760
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I have nothing to go on but reason here, but it seems to me that smaller niche sites like these would be more impacted by piracy. This is exclusive material and there isn't anything else like it out there so having it stolen would be a real disappointment. I contrast that with a site that makes porn where a girl gets picked up by some guys in a van and talked into sex. Those are a dime a dozen so I suspect that even pirates tire of those. Having said that, I still feel penalized for something that I've never done nor would do.
While this stuff would certainly even push my limits, I don't have to dig too deep in the collection for evidence of how I really, really need counselling... ;-)
|
07-24-12 07:45am
|
Reply
1761
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Funny, I went to IAFD to check on her age and completely missed her nationality... Thanks for clarifying that.
|
07-24-12 07:40am
|
Review
1762
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Nothing else quite like it
- Pushes the boundaries on extreme insertions
- Very rare male on female anal fisting
- Exclusive material
- Photos and Videos
- Resolutions on even mid-grade videos look great
- Updates regularly |
| Cons: |
- Streaming only
- true HD stutters a lot even with a high-speed connection
- Insertions only no actual sex
- Expensive for whats offered |
| Bottom Line: |
First, please let me introduce you to an 800lb. gorilla in the room because readers will definitely notice it: yes, this is an EXTREME site. It isnt for everyone. Heck, Im pretty sure that a lot of it isnt even for me, and Im a fan of extreme anal stuff. So, readers, please remember that even if you dont like this niche, Im wearing my reviewers hat as much as my perverts hat, so please keep the comments civil.
The other 800lb. gorilla in the room is the fact that the site offers no downloads at all. That goes for photos and videos. The site explains and justifies that by noting the risk of piracy if we, people who actively support pay sites, are allowed to keep what we see. I have no doubt that piracy is probably the biggest problem in the online porn industry today and Im sure it hurts small sites like this much more than big sites, but I am not convinced that penalizing supportive paying customers is the solution. I really hope that the site re-thinks this policy.
Hot Kinky Jo is an attractive Russian model who speaks good English and appears to be in her mid-20s. Shes petite and has looks more common in mainstream porn rather than the often rough, hard look of a model who pushes the limits in extreme fetish porn. According to an interview she gave to Jay Sin in Anal Acrobats she got her start doing webcam work and discovered she has a particular talent for being able to insert large objects into her ass. Im not sure if there is such a title, but if there is then Jo deserves to be labeled the Queen of Extreme Anal Insertions. In fact, I suspect that if the title comes with a crown then she could easily insert that into her bum.
The videos all feature some sort of extreme anal play. There are solo scenes where Jo anally fists herself, scenes where she uses huge dildos in her ass, including one where she takes more of a horse-dick dildo than would seem possible. There are scenes where she is with one or more women where there is more extreme insertion and usually female on female anal fisting. There are even a few scenes with male on female anal fisting. Im not aware of any other site that offers this. In several scenes Jo actually takes more than one fist in her: three go in during one scene. I warned you that this was extreme stuff. One thing you will not see is actual anal sex, but that isnt the theme here anyway.
One niche that the site promotes is prolapse or rosebud porn. I am most definitely NOT a fan of this and I know this sounds weird, but I have no stomach for prolapse stuff in the middle of a fisting video.
The site is very small, which is likely because its so new. There are only 17 videos and 15 photo shoots available as of this writing. To make matters worse, the videos are short, all coming in at just under eight minutes long. But Im guessing that if youre having your ass fisted, eight minutes could seem like an eternity
The photo sets all have 100+ photos. Many of the photos shoots appear to be shot at the same time as the videos.
The site, which only began last month, currently updates every two or three days. Video updates seem more frequent than photo updates.
I cant give full specs on the videos or photos because I dont know how to do that for streams. The videos are offered in three resolutions, low (1.5MB/s), medium (5)MB/s) and HD (10MB/s). I have a 60MB/s fibre op connection and I found the HD stuff unwatchable due to stuttering and long and frequent buffering delays. But when the HD stuff played, it did look good. The medium looks excellent too and didnt suffer the same problems. The photos also offer three resolutions. Both videos and pictures open into a viewer on the page. I really cant give much more technical detail because I dont normally use streaming.
Not that this is relevant, but this site is the first Ive noticed that uses the new xxx top-level domain. Until I noticed that I couldnt figure out why I couldnt find the site by simply googling hotkinkyjo.
Ill usually base a recommendation on value. And for me, cost is only one factor in deciding on value. Given the uniqueness of this site Id normally be willing to say it provides decent value even though it costs $30 per month and only has a small amount of material. But and this is only my opinion the lack of downloads means I just cant recommend this. Until they offer downloads I wont be back and Id only recommend the site to someone who really likes this niche and understands that it is streaming only. |
|
07-23-12 05:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1763
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
alexthorn's Reply
Thanks for the update. I've reviewed the TOS and still don't see that explained, but I'll write my review taking into account this new information. The TOS that I can see at the join page is:
(by join our site You accept our TOS):
1. The site works at its best when the resolution is 1920 x 1080 (FULL HD). But You can see it without any problems even in 800x600 too.
2. The site is correctly functioning when You are using Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox. Other browsers can be working too, but their effective use is at Your own risk.
3. When You are using Mozilla Firefox make sure that You have not disabled its scripts (they are enabled by default).
4. All materials published on www.hotkinkyjo.xxx is legitimate property of this site's owners and You are not allowed to share, copy, republish or reproduce it anywhere. This material can be watched solely for personal use and only at hotkinkyjo.xxx
5. Proxy connection is not allowed.
6. All the models are 20 years or older. All content published here is legal.
7. To join this site you must be 18 years or older.
8. The site contains video materials that are accessible in 3 quality formats: 720x400, 1280x720 and FULLHD 1920x1080
9. 720x400 video format requires at least 1500Kbps downlink bandwidth to play.
10. 1280x720 video format requires at least 4Mbps downlink bandwidth to play.
11. 1920x1080 video format requires at least 8Mbps downlink bandwidth to play.
You have an amazing site and I understand your fears about piracy but I wish you'd reconsider your policy to not allow downloads. It punishes customers like me and others who don't condone or support piracy. Please reconsider!
|
07-22-12 10:25am
|
Reply
1764
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
The good news, I guess, is that no other TBP / PU member should fall into the same trap.
What bugs me about this is that the site clearly says why they're running things this way, and that's fear of piracy. I understand that, but I can't help but feel penalized because I'm following the rules. I have many terabytes of porn and not so much as one bit is pirated. But I can't download from this site because I'm not trustworthy.
I will acknowledge, however, that it must be frustrating for webmatsers to see their material pirated and posted for sharing.
|
07-21-12 12:51pm
|
Comment
1765
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
|
07-20-12 11:00am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
1766
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Otoh - thanks for flagging that this site exists.
I realize that a site like this will be very polarizing for members. Personally, while I am a huge fan of anal-themed sites, and a huge fan of large insertions, I am most certainly NOT a fan of prolapse or "rosebud" porn. That fact that this is a niche with a name is a bit creepy.
Having said that, HKJ is one talented woman. If anyone is interested in seeing her talents at work I'd highly recommend watching her scene in Jay Sin's Anal Acrobats 7. She inserts a dildo that really qualifies her as being fisted (and "armed" if that's a thing!).
Her next feat was something that I wouldnt have thought possible until I saw it. She inserts mini-basketballs in her ass. Theyre about the size of a large orange. Sure, this has been done before. Thats what I was thinking. Until the fourth one went in. Then the fifth. Sixth. Seventh and finally the eighth. I have never seen anything like this before. There is a photo of her on her preview page where she's laying on her belly and the eight balls are lined up showing the total size of them. It really defies my understanding of human anatomy.
At one point in the scene she inserts several of the balls again and then gets fucked in the ass with the balls in there.
This woman is definitely the new reigning anal queen.
Anal Acrobats is available on the Evil Angel channel at Videobox and is also on the Evil Angel site.
|
07-16-12 04:28am
|
Reply
1767
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Reply
I'll probably take your advice and join for a month. It does look pretty unique even for BDSM sites
|
12-29-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
1768
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
I've been checking out the preview pages here for the past few years as I love good BDSM stuff. This looks very innovative and it is definitely unique. One of these days I'll join, but if what you say about the photos is also true for the videos than that might be a problem as I'm getting fussier as I get older and harddrive space gets cheaper.
|
12-10-12 06:47pm
|
Reply
1769
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Great review of an interesting site. I hadn't ever considered joining the DDF Network but with this site I might have a look. The tour pages underscore your concern that with so many BDSM fetishes to cater to that most members are going to encounter stuff they have no interest in. I see that there is a full trial and that may be a way to fully explore the site and see if there is enough to justify the full membership.
|
01-02-12 11:48am
|
Reply
1770
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Excellent review! Thanks for making the effort to write a meaningful review. I'm a big fan of BDSM-themed material and prior to your review I wasn't aware of this site or network. I'll definitely check them out - and do so with my eyes open to their shortcomings and assets - based on your review.
|
08-14-10 01:34am
|
Reply
1771
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Reply
Yeah, but in fairness to these guys if Tanner Mayes had a site and told me to review it, that would be the first score of 200 ever awarded on PU.
Seriously though, there might be some bias in these reviews...
|
06-29-12 08:23pm
|
Reply
1772
|
Hunter Leigh
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Wow! She really is beautiful. I used to subscribe to sites like this but now stick mostly to hardcore. I'd consider this but at $25 it really doesn't seem to be a good value.
|
02-07-20 12:36pm
|
Reply
1773
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
To be fair to the site, it's just a guess that it was compromised there. It could have been elsewhere. Tomorrow will be a week without a credit card. I didn't realize how important that is until I don't have one.
|
09-30-12 11:46am
|
Reply
1774
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Definitely compromised. I never left Canada but my card paid for a flight from Saudi Arabia to Kuala Lumpur.
Still waiting for my new card... no porn memberships until then!
|
09-28-12 04:39am
|
Reply
1775
|
Hush Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
I may have been a bit harsh on the site since it really could have been any transaction that caused the problem. It just seems like a bit of a coincidence that I use a site without a biller and shortly after that my card is compromised.
No huge inconvenience... a new card is on the way. The biggest inconvenience is setting up a few monthly debits for newspapers.
|
09-25-12 04:57pm
|
