| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2701
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Reply
Thanks for the tip. I've been going through the TS stuff available at Evil Angel and there is a marked difference from about 2017 going forward where the post-2017 models are much more feminine than the pre-2017 models. But I admit that this is also a subjective observation.
The company that has EA also has a new 100% TS site that seems worth checking out too.
It's a bit odd to be a porn collector for so long and 'discover' a niche I'd never really paid attention to in the past. Odd, but fun.
|
09-30-20 08:52am
|
Reply
2702
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
Interesting review.
Up until recently I had no exposure to TS scenes but after reading a thread on another site and seeing some of the current models in the business I most definitely developed an interest. I'm a regular subscriber to Evil Angel though I've never looked at their decent collection of TS material - until today. I filtered the site for TS material only and dove in. I liked what I saw and I downloaded a lot.
I can see myself joining other TS sites in the near future.
I likely won't join TS Pussy Hunters though as my preference is a TS woman with a male. But it's good to know that there is variety in the niche!
|
09-29-20 03:47pm
|
Comment
2703
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
|
07-01-19 10:27am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2704
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeC's Reply
Thanks! I didn't want to blame anyone. I've been a member at these sites often enough to feel comfortable that this wasn't something they did deliberately. I wouldn't want to leave anyone with this impression. Also, while I don't have a lot of experience with VXNBill there is enough information for me to go on that they aren't the culprit either.
I suspect that this is just another case of sites and individuals being subject to another malicious hack. These loopholes will be fixed and the hackers will find another way in.
|
02-21-19 02:44pm
|
Comment
2705
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
|
02-21-19 11:18am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2706
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My guess is that they found one that charges less. But the strange thing is that you'd think that a biller that needs staff to deal with every membership issue would charge more. I often tell myself that someday I'm only going to subscribe to sites with the few billers I trust but I just can't bring myself to do that. Though I have started using pre-paid cards with billers I don't know or don't trust.
|
01-19-19 06:41am
|
Comment
2707
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
|
|
01-16-19 10:24am
Replies (3)
|
Review
2708
|
Tushy Raw
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 13 videos
- Updates weekly
- A-list models
- Exclusive scenes
- All anal
- Six download resolutions
- Photos (singles and zipped)
- Streaming (no resolution options)
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Odd quirks
- Not particularly raw
- Expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because I like Greg Lansky’s work and because the site is 100% anal. The site follows the same model as Lansky’s other ‘Raw’ site, Blacked Raw. While the regular Tushy site features more ‘glamourous’ scenes featuring anal sex, Tushy Raw aims to give the viewer a more ‘raw’ view at that. In my opinion, however, the site doesn’t really deliver on its promise.
‘Raw’ in the context of this site and it’s sister site Blacked Raw, doesn’t actually have rawer sex. The rawness is derived from the scenes all being shot at night using stark lighting so that the model is the primary focus with everything else being dark. Perhaps the oddest choice in the scenes is an attempt to remove the male talent as much as possible. It’s rare that we see the male talent’s face but what’s really odd is that the male is dressed in a black (or purple, it’s hard to tell with the lighting) skintight lycra or nylon long-sleeved pullover shirt and pants of the same material. The only modification is that there is a hole cut in the front of the pants so the male talent can get his dick out, which is a good thing considering that this is a porn site.
The scenes have little setup, We get some shots of the model in a large city at night then the scene moves into a dimly lit apartment and the sex begins almost immediately. Most, and maybe all, of the scenes start with the model having a buttplug in. There is usually some oral on the male but none on the female. I presume this is in keeping with the intent to keep the male’s face out of the frame. The sex is conventional but it is all anal. Most scenes have some ass-to-mouth and most end with a facial.
I’ve watched most of the scenes and haven’t seen any vaginal sex yet. But as a fan of anal scenes, that isn’t something that I’d complain about anyway.
The scenes are all between 30 and 45 minutes long. The production values are high though my preference would be a bit less editing.
As with all of Lansky’s sites, the models are all current A-listers. They are all known for their anal scenes. Most fall into the young-and-petite category.
The site provides a lot of access on the tour pages so a prospective member can see what the site has to offer.
The site is still quite small with only 13 scenes available currently. It adds one new scene per week so it is growing, albeit slowly. (One thing I like is that the pending upload is shown so you can see who the model is and when the scene will be available.)
The scenes can be streamed though there are no resolution options for that. Downloads are available in six resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p SD, 480p mobile, 360p and 270p. I downloaded the 720p files and those have a high bitrate of 8000+ kb/s. The scenes look crisp and sharp.
There are photos available as singles or as a zip. Those are 2000x3000 in size.
The site layout is simple and logical, though with a site this small it would be hard to have it any other way. If you’ve been a member of any of Lansky’s other sites this will look familiar. There are six scenes per page and each scene opens to a new page for downloads or streaming. There are tags used as well. The site can also be sorted by model.
I had no issue using a download manager and I found the download speeds fast and on par with other major porn sites. I had no problems with broken links or failed downloads.
Landing on a bottom line recommendation is difficult. I hadn’t planned to join the site this soon but knew that I eventually would because it’s a Lansky anal site. I moved up my joining plans when I took advantage of a Christmas deal to another Lansky site (offered through TBP) and that site offered me a good deal on TR. Otherwise, without a discount it’s hard to see this site as a good value. Obviously the narrow focus of the site will only appeal to some people but the nagging question I have regarding the site is ‘what’s the point?’ Tushy itself is a great anal-themed site and apart from the lighting and the guy in the nylon clothes there really isn’t enough to justify a second site. One major issue I have with the site is that there are many ways that Tushy-like anal scenes could be made more ‘raw’ and I don’t think that the choices that Lansky made would be on anyone’s list if looking to bring a rawer edge.
So I guess the best that I can do is this: if you really like Lansky’s work, if you really like anal scenes AND you can find a discounted price then consider joining. The site really is well done and features some beautiful models doing anal sex in exclusive scenes. At full price though I don’t think the site is a good value yet. Given the small size and the not-all-that-different scenes the site feels more like a cash grab at this point. |
|
01-13-19 11:47am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2709
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
|
02-21-19 11:17am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2710
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
|
01-16-19 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2711
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I'm not going to disagree with you because you back your points up with valid arguments and, well, I mostly agree with you.
But on the other hand I keep a recurring membership to Tushy because of the number of first-anals that they offer. Well, that's not the only reason, but that is a big one.
I'm sure there are several reasons why Tushy gets so many models to perform their first on-screen anal scenes. The site probably pays a lot for those bragging rights. It can't hurt (literally and figuratively) that the scenes are softer than what are offered on a lot of other anal-themed sites. Like Holed, for example.
Some of my favourite stars have done their first anal scenes here. Riley Reid, Samantha Rone, Jojo Kiss, Lana Rhoades, Leah Gotti, Ash Hollywood, Eliza Jane and Lucy Cline among them. Kimberly Brix did her first DP here.
For whatever reason (and I really can't explain it) I like collecting 'firsts' and first anal scenes are my favourite of those.
But I do see your point... While I like Tushy for their 'firsts' I find the sex hotter at some other sites.
|
05-31-17 05:21pm
|
Reply
2712
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks. I'd never heard of that player before. I'll download it and give it a try to see if it solves the problem. I still think that there has to be a part of this issue at my end too.
|
05-30-17 12:46pm
|
Reply
2713
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Did you have or have you had any trouble with the files once you downloaded them? I've got a recurring membership and for some reason more than half of the scenes I download won't play properly. I use VLC Player and as soon as I try to fast-forward using the slider the scene will freeze at the same point. I'm fairly sure that this is partly my problem and partly something at this site. It's partly my problem because I now use a different computer to download the Tushy scenes and the problem is gone - even watching them on the same computer that would normally have problems. But it has to be partly the site's doing too since I don't have that problem with any other site.
Have you experienced anything similar?
Great review, BTW.
As a fan of anal scenes I agree that Tushy can be a bit sterile.
|
05-29-17 04:13pm
|
Reply
2714
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
One thing that continues to impress me about PU is how civil everyone has remained, even with new members joining all the time. The bar was set high and has stayed that way. I can't imagine a more civil forum on any topic exists on the internet.
|
12-24-16 05:00am
|
Reply
2715
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Having a counterpoint to mostly positive reviews is good though. PU is invaluable for that reason.
|
12-24-16 04:58am
|
Reply
2716
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Part of me wants to strangle you for writing bad things about Tushy, but the bigger part of me has to admit that you’re right. Objectively, Tushy is a bit dull. They strive for a certain look in every scene and that includes the models they cast. While the scenes aren't formulaic they do stick within some narrow boundaries. And you’re right, ethnicity, age and body type are among those boundaries.
I think it’s great for anyone reading PU reviews to see that there is a counter-view to the glowing reviews that some of us wrote.
This is still a favourite site of mine and will likely remain so for a long time but I can appreciate and understand your counterpoints. I like the model types the select and I like how the scenes are shot and edited, even if they are a bit stilted. But the big thing I really like about the site is that the formula they use (probably it’s just a big wad of cash!) obviously appeals to models who don’t normally do anal scenes. One the big draws to this site for me is the first and rare anals that they shoot.
But your points are definitely valid and will add a lot of credibility to how PU members review the site. Even if you're wrong... :-)
|
12-21-16 02:55pm
|
Reply
2717
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree with you on both counts: I'll rejoin when there are more scenes and I really wish they'd bundle Blacked and Tushy. Or at least offer a decent discount to the other site if you have a membership to one.
|
07-10-15 09:32am
|
Reply
2718
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I had to give you credit for pointing out that connection. Both Blacked and Tushy are amazing sites. I hope they do really well.
|
07-07-15 04:49pm
|
Review
2719
|
Tushy.com
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips |
| Cons: |
- New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site won’t remember username / password |
| Bottom Line: |
Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.
As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who don’t know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)
Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though they’re new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces – anal and expensive production costs – is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)
As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and I’d recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.
Streaming is also available but I can’t tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.
Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what I’d expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.
The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasn’t a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasn’t recurred since.
Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche it’s great that this site may be offering more of that.
While all the scenes look like they’re exclusive to this site I can’t say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ‘Exclusive’ splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and I’ve never seen these scenes before.
I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and that’s a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. I’m only aware of one other anal scene she’s done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe she’s playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesn’t look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.
The bottom line is that with the current size of the site it’s hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of what’s offered here too, and it’s fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. It’s also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site. |
|
07-06-15 05:12pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2720
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm amazed at the number of companies that provide an email address for contact but don't monitor it. I'm glad you got your issue resolved.
To be fair to Twisty's, they did solve it. And to be fair to MBI-Probiller they didn't have the information to solve it. When I called the toll-free number MBI gave me the problem was solved in less than 5 minutes because the woman at the other end of the phone could quickly determine that I didn't use the cam site and refunded the charges. I guess my beef is two-fold: Twisty's needs to tighten up their security a bit and MBI needs to give their online service reps some leeway to drop the upsells. Being offered a discount for a site I didn't join and was fraudulently hacked makes no sense!
|
03-24-15 06:02pm
|
Comment
2721
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
03-22-15 07:40am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2722
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment. I'm no expert either, but it seems to me that they could reduce the file size and still maintain a good quality.
|
03-15-15 04:29pm
|
Review
2723
|
Twistys
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site (7000+ videos)
- Photos and videos
- Several resolutions offered
- Updates daily
- Good navigation and search functions
- Allows download managers
- TBP/PU discount |
| Cons: |
- Wide gap in file sizes between medium and high resolution
- Download speeds vary but are mostly slower than average
- Primarily a solo girl site |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve been an active internet porn buyer for more than 15 years and I had to ask myself why I’d never joined Twisty’s since it seems to be one of the larger and more popular sites around. So I joined. I realize that a lot of any reaction to a site is subjective and my subjective response to the site is that it lacks any real heat. In is recent review of the site, Graymane hit the nail on the head when he noted that the site seems to be lacking heat. For me, I think a lot of that lack of heat comes from the fact that this isn't the kind of site I’d usually join. Objectively it’s a great site, but subjectively it isn't for me.
The site uses a ‘trick’ commonly used by many sites in that it sells itself as a network when it really isn't. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but there is a main site where everything in available and then the ‘sites’ allow you to filter the scenes and photos further. For example, all the hardcore scenes can be filtered by selecting the ‘site’ called “Twisty’s Hard.”
The site is huge with more close to 7700 videos uploaded. 385 of those feature b/g hardcore sex. 186 are lesbian and the remainder are solo girl. The site caters to photo collectors too, with equal emphasis on photos. (I’d prefer to tell you exactly how many photo sets are available but I ran out of patience. The site only allows the user to advance two pages at a time and after advancing through almost 400 pages of videos two pages at a time I just couldn’t bring myself to do that again. This is a minor flaw that should be fixed.)
I collect videos so this review will be on that part of the site.
The videos are mostly offered in three resolutions, 240, 480 and 720. Ordinarily I’d opt for the 720 for quality but I always look for a balance of resolution and file size. A problem with the site is that there is a vast chasm between the file sizes for the 480 and the 720 resolutions. It wasn’t unusual to have a scene where the 480 resolution was 500MB and the 720 was more than 2GB. Because of that difference I opted to go with the 480 and those are 1024x576 and 3000kb/s. There are some scenes that offer a fourth resolution of 1080 and with those there tends to be less of a gap between the 480 and 720 files. I can’t say how many scenes offer the 1080 resolution because they aren't marked and it isn't an option on even most of the newest updates.
Speaking of updates, the site doesn’t disappoint in that there is one new video and one photo set added per day.
The site allows download managers and I had no problem using one. I had no issues with links timing out but most of my links were never more than a half hour old anyway. I didn’t encounter any download limits. One problem I did encounter was a wide variation in download speeds. There were times when I saw downloads as fast as 15MB/s but there were a lot more times when the speeds were lower than 3MB/s.
My three biggest complaints about the site are purely subjective and I haven’t factored them into the score. Depending on your tastes these may be seen as positives for you. The site is primarily a solo girl site and that isn't something that I collect. I find solo scenes boring because they lack any interaction with another person. I find that interaction, when done right, creates a sexual tension and for me that’s where the heat comes from. Second, the site seems to favor models with large breasts, whether they’re real or fake. This is especially true of the older videos as the newer ones do seem to have a bit better balance between smaller-breasted models and ginormous-breasted models. The final complaint is that there aren't a lot of anal scenes and those that are offered are mostly older and with European models. (As an aside, searching for anal scenes will bring up hundreds, but they include solo scenes in that count too. To be fair, once you get the search results for anal you can then further sort by site and selecting “Twisty’s Hard” will give you all the hardcore scenes. If you’re interested in this niche, there are only 23.)
Overall the site is well laid out and it is relatively easy to find what you’re looking for. You can sort by model, there is an effective search function and they use tags effectively. Navigating is easy here.
The bottom line is that this is a great site as long as you know in advance what you’re getting: the site is primarily a solo girl site that offers both videos and photo sets and they add in some hardcore b/g and lesbian to keep things interesting and to offer something for everyone. The site has some flaws but overall they do more right than they do wrong. I won’t be back (for the subjective reasons I’ve noted) but I would recommend the site to someone who likes solo girl stuff with a sprinkling of relatively tame hardcore. The site certainly delivers on that. |
|
03-15-15 08:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2724
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I wonder if this might be part of their business model. Rather than simply cancelling online they make you call them and listen to their pitch to stay. I'd guess that's an expensive way to do business.
|
11-05-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
2725
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
me too. I'd hate to have to call someone to resolve an issue that could easily be fixed online like thousands of other adult sites do.
|
11-05-12 04:00pm
|
