| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2551
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
t9chome's Comment
Try clearing your memory or trying a different browser. I had an email offer that wouldn't work so I switched browsers and it did. But then again, they may not offer a discount to TBP members any longer.
|
10-09-18 02:00pm
|
Reply
2552
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Reply
Thanks for your comments. I understand you wanting to maintain the camera on the girl's face, but I'm okay with the ass shots - I just wish they'd get naked!
|
07-13-15 11:15am
|
Review
2553
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week |
| Cons: |
- Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice |
| Bottom Line: |
I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I can’t say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.
Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set – in this case it’s an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so they’re still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.
The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that I’ll just keep a recurring membership at that price.
Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally I’d like to see some sex too. With the model naked.
There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.
I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think it’s justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. I’m usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site I’ll add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but I’ll go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that I’ll just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to. |
|
07-05-15 07:27am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2554
|
Swallowed
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks for letting me know that. Maybe next time I'll be paying more attention!
|
03-19-18 04:49pm
|
Reply
2555
|
Swallowed
(0)
|
Reply of
Onyx's Reply
I even tried the link on a different device that wouldn't have any history on it and the deal isn't there either. It was either for a very short time or the good people at Swallowed just don't like us here.
|
03-17-18 06:15am
|
Reply
2556
|
Swallowed
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm glad to see it isn't just me. I join Swallowed regularly but I'll wait a bit longer. It was the deal that would have caused me to join early.
|
03-17-18 06:14am
|
Comment
2557
|
Swallowed
(0)
|
|
03-16-18 03:27pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
2558
|
Swallowed
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Unique blowjob site
- Top porn stars
- High-energy performances
- Sloppy blowjobs with spit play (if you’re into that)
- High production values
- Mostly exclusive
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- No TBP discount
- Questionable biller |
| Bottom Line: |
Leave it to a porn Maestro like Mike Adriano to start a blowjob site and find a way to make it unique. Blowjob sites are nothing new and seem to run the gamut from passionate to misogynistic but Swallowed is the only blowjob site that features models giving enthusiastic and sloppy head. The level of energy that the models bring to each of these scenes is, for me, what makes the site stand apart from the crowd.
The models here are all A-list stars. To make things better, most of the scenes feature two or three of these big stars in the same scene. This casting allows the stars to feed off of the energy of the others helping to make each scene special.
If you’re a Mike Adriano fan you know his work can be formulaic, and the same is true here. For those opposed to following a formula I get that, but in a lot of cases the formula works. In my opinion, it works here. The formula here is essentially the same one that Mike uses in all his scenes: the scene opens with the model or models sitting on the couch in Mike’s house while dressed in clothes that would likely get them arrested in public. There is a brief interview and then the models start to shed clothes. Given that most of the scenes here have multiple models there is usually some girl-on-girl play at this point. As with Mike’s formula, he spends some time getting intimately acquainted with each of the girls’ anuses. Then the attention shifts to the blowjob. As I said above, the blowjobs are very enthusiastic and very sloppy. If the site has a downside, it’s that if you aren't a fan of sloppy blowjobs then you’re not apt to be happy here. There is some spit play in almost all of the scenes and it is fair to say that spit play is partly what this site is about.
An advantage to most of the scenes having multiple high-energy models is that none of them take any time off during the scene. Mike’s cock, balls and ass all get a lot of attention, with the models swapping places regularly.
The final advantage to most of the scenes having multiple high-energy models is that there is often cum play and swapping.
I’m a big fan of f-on-m rimming in scenes and if you are too then this site is a gold mine for it. I catalogue rimming in scenes and I had to give up with this site. Instead I now catalogue the scenes that don’t have f-on-m rimming because they are rare. My preference would be for Mike to use different positions occasionally when getting rimmed, but that isn't a deal breaker.
The site currently has 103 scenes with a new one being added approximately every four or five days. When the site went live in 2016 most of the initial upload was of oral scenes from Mike’s DVDs. The good news is that once the site got its feet under it the scenes are now exclusive. I didn’t count them, but a good guess is that of the available scenes over 90 are exclusive.
As with all of Mike’s scenes, he has the resources to ensure near perfection. While his budget for talent must be big he doesn’t scrimp on production values. The lighting, sound, camera work and editing are all top-shelf.
The technical side of the site is well done too. The site is well thought out and the scenes are easily searchable. The site also uses tags.
The scenes are available to stream in three resolutions. They are available for download in four resolutions. There are two 1920x1080 files (12,000 and 5,000 kb/s), a 1280x720 file (1500) and a 640x360 file (500). All have 30fps. I downloaded the 1080p scenes with the lower bitrate to save some disk space. The higher bitrate files look sharper but the file size is about double the lower bitrate. The 5000kb/s files look great on a 24” monitor and a 50” TV.
If the site has one flaw it is that it doesn’t use one of the better billers. The site bills through Customercare.co and while I have never had a problem with them they don’t make cancelling easy. I posted my issues with this biller on a thread in the forum. https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=5209 Given my complaints you may think me hypocritical to continue to use them, but the reality is that I like Swallowed enough to put up with some billing frustration.
The site allows download managers and I’ve never had an issue downloading while using one.
Unfortunately the site doesn’t offer a TBP discount. This is doubly annoying because they offer discounts on other sites. I hope the TBP staff can get the same deal for here.
The bottom line for me is that this is an excellent blowjob site as long as a prospective member knows what he or she is getting. This isn't about a woman giving passionate pleasure to her man and it isn't about brutal face-fucking. This site is about exuberant, enthusiastic women giving sloppy head with tons of drool. And it’s about the balls and ass getting almost as much attention as the cock. I HIGHLY recommend joining this site. |
|
12-28-17 06:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2559
|
Sweet Sinner
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Decent sized site
- Four bonus sites
- Lots of well-known A-listers
- Softer hardcore (may be good for couples)
- Good mix of model ages ranging from 18 to MILF
- Story-driven scenes (without a plot connecting all the scenes)
- Supports download managers
- Part of the Fame Digital family of sites
- Many of the models sport pubic hair |
| Cons: |
- Very little anal
- If you don’t like some niches you may be disappointed in the number of DVDs with that niche |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m a big fan of studio sites but I had never heard of Sweet Sinner Studio until I had an email offer recently with an offer that I couldn’t refuse. If forced to describe what their niche is I’d say it is like the love child of Evil Angel and Wicked Pictures. They have high quality production values with ‘soft’ hardcore. You won’t find a lot of rough sex here. The scenes aren’t gonzo in that they have a plot for each scene even though there is no overall plot running through most of the DVDs. The models are almost exclusively Caucasian but there is a good mix of ages. I prefer younger models (think Chastity Lynn) but someone who prefers older models would be equally happy with the site. If there is one (subjective) thing about the site I don’t like it’s the lack of anal scenes. Those are very rare.
Another interesting feature that seems rare in porn is that a lot of the models (even the A-listers) have unshaven pubic hair. Many are trimmed, and there are many still bare, but there is a lot more pubic hair on this site then I’ve seen in a long time. I prefer bare or trimmed on the younger models I like, but I know many PU members like older women and also like public hair so this may be a good reason for you to join this site.
The site currently has 85 DVDs uploaded. Most DVDs have between four and six scenes available. The first scenes were uploaded in December 2011 and the site continues to update by adding a new scene every four days. The practice seems to be to have two DVDs updating so if you’re waiting for a new scene in a new DVD you might be waiting at least eight days for it.
The site is part of the Fame Digital family of sites, which is mostly positive. Fame offers high quality porn at great prices. The sites (including this one) use simple and effective navigation tools. You can sort by DVD, by scene, by star and by niche. Like all newer material uploaded in the Fame network this site offers a huge variety of ways to access the material. I can’t imagine anyone being disappointed. Streaming is available at resolutions of 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Downloads are also available in those resolutions but if you want 540, 720 or 1080 you’ll be limited to mp4. The lower res downloads are available as wmvs or mp4. They even offer a wide range of resolutions for mobile devices, up to and including 1080.
I downloaded only the 1080 stuff and it looks great. It comes in at 1920x1080 at 6800kb/s and 29fps. File sizes range from approx. 1GB to 2.5GB (for the 1080p files).
One drawback to any Fame site had always been that even though they supported download managers, the scene links timed out very quickly. In the past I’d guess that timeouts of about 10 minutes were common – if not less. I’ve noticed that this issue seems to have been fixed so I purposely tried to find a timeout here. There is one, but it seems to be about an hour, which is far more reasonable now.
Photos are available but I can see no way to download zips. This really isn’t a photo site though.
Membership also gives you access to Couples Seeking Teens, Doghouse Digital, Reality Junkies and Sweet Heart Video. I’m not planning to review any of those so here are some brief stats:
• Couples Seeking Teens: 12 DVDs of the Reality Junkies series by the same name. Updating.
• Doghouse Digital: 121 Doghouse Digital DVDs. Updating. Mix of standard porn, MILF, cuckold scenes, some lesbian, and some pegging
• Reality Junkies: 91 Reality Junkies DVDs (including those on Couples Seeking Teens). Mix of standard porn with a lot of MILF material.
• Sweet Heart Video: 119 videos from the studio of that name. All-girl material. Updating
A common complaint that I’ve read recently about any Fame site is that cancelling is more difficult than with CC Bill or other billers. While it isn’t as simple to cancel as other billers, it is still relatively easy. Confirmation emails give the Famecare name and a quick search brings you to their page where the membership is easy to cancel.
This is an excellent site and adding in the bonus sites makes it an even better value. The studios here all have high production values and the scenes all feature beautiful models. The models cover a broad spectrum of tastes and preferences and range in age from 18 to MILF. This is a site that tries to appeal to a wide range of people and it succeeds in that attempt. I’d definitely recommend this site. |
|
06-05-13 04:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2560
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
mike04's Review
I'm with Jay G and Capn on this one - customer service is extremely important when you have an issue. Anyone can create decent content and put it on the net but if you show absolute disrespect to your customers you deserve your own level of hell after death. Thanks for the review and warning.
I also agree that processing services should be pressured to drop these sites. But we also need to make sure that sites that provide decent customer service get noted too.
Finally, welcome to the forum! I look forward to more of your reviews.
|
08-14-10 01:44am
|
Reply
2561
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I had a look at BT and you're definitely right. BT seems to be miles ahead of Take 5 with the same style and even some of the same models. I might just pop in and have a longer, paid look.
|
10-31-11 03:56am
|
Reply
2562
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I really can't understand why a site in 2011 that is primarily a photo site wouldn't use zips. That really baffles me...
|
10-30-11 11:26am
|
Review
2563
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- New site
- Introductory offer for membership
- Beautiful models
- Models aren’t overdone
- Seems to be growing |
| Cons: |
- Very small site
- Pics are low resolution
- Pics lack a zip option
- Videos are low resolution
- Videos are short in duration
- Very softcore (may be a positive to some) |
| Bottom Line: |
Caveat emptor certainly applies here. I was lured in by a special introductory price and only then saw the flaws in the site.
To be fair, I can imagine that it must be really difficult to start a new adult website when you’re using (semi?) exclusive material. Your startup costs must be high and your cash flow likely only trickles in for a while. Having said that though, this site appears to have cut a few corners.
The site’s biggest flaw for now is its size. This is a small site though they seem to be adding new material. The last addition was about two weeks ago but they are advertising a new model as ‘coming soon.’ Based on the updates there it looks like they add a model and then over a week put up five sets / scenes of her.
The concept of “Take 5” might be a flaw too. It appears that all models have only five sets or scenes on the site. The majority of models have four photo sets and one video, but two of the models have three and two. As the site grows (which I hope it will) that will mean a lot of variety in models but the downside will be limited material for a model you really like.
The sets and scenes aren’t up to 2011 standards. Photos are only 797x1200 and are much lower resolution than other similar sites. The biggest issue with the pictures though is the lack of a zip option. That’s a deal-breaker for me. I like photos though I’m more of a video collector, but if I like a model I’d certainly download zipped sets of photos. But I’m not going to sit at my computer for hours saving single photos. But with only 26 photo sets on offer now, that could be an option.
For someone who prefers videos, this site is a big disappointment. There are only nine videos on the site as I write this. The longest video is just short of 11 minutes long, the others are around five minutes long. The biggest problem with the videos is their resolution. The site promotes them as HD, but they measure that by some means that is foreign to me. The videos are 864x480 and 1700kbps, which, as I understand it, can’t be understood as being HD. The videos are offered in three different formats: QuickTime, WMV (Codec 9) and a smaller version for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV versions because of a personal preference but I downloaded one QT file to see if the quality was better. It is marginally better.
The site appears to support download managers (I use Free Download Manager) but with just nine videos on the site it doesn’t really make a difference. I downloaded all nine videos in less than ten minutes. Download speeds were up to standard.
There isn’t a search function but one isn’t needed either at this point. You click on a model’s picture and it opens into her page with the five sets and scenes listed using large thumbnails.
The models appear to be mostly exclusive, though as otoh noted in his comment about the site there is some overlap with Breath Takers. I’m not familiar with BT, but I don’t doubt otoh when he says that there appears to be some sharing. (This seems odd in that BT and Take 5 are listed as having different parent companies at TBP. Maybe take 5 was spun of for some reason.)
The models themselves aren’t typical porn queens, and I mean that as a positive, not a negative. They look like women you’d see on the street in any city, and with a few exceptions the makeup isn’t overdone.
Subjectively, the models are very attractive but the sets / scenes are a little too soft for my tastes. The one g/g scene is so tame they could legally show it on Canadian Television after 10PM.
The site is new, so I’m hoping that they grow and do well. They’re offering a special introductory price of $14.95 but I have no idea how long that will last. Even at that lower price this isn’t a good value yet, so the site will probably only appeal to people who like a specific model. For a new site though, they aren’t up to industry standards for the technical bits. Being new, I’d certainly cut them some slack on the quantity, but the quality should have been at least up to normal standards from the beginning. Why start a site in 2011 and offer 2008 quality? |
|
10-30-11 07:09am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2564
|
Teach Me Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thanks for the information. Based on this I think I'll take the plunge with the network.
|
12-15-10 07:12am
|
Reply
2565
|
Teach Me Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Rusty: I've been looking at this site for a while but have a couple of questions that you might be able to answer. Roughly what percentage of the scenes are anal fisting versus vaginal fisting? Finally, I've speculated that if I join the network through this site then they'd have to give immediate access to it rather than give me access to a bunch of other sites and make me wait a month to get the site I really want. Does that make sense in your experience?
(I should also add that I contacted the network to ask about how the sites are staggered for multi-month memberships and got no response.)
Thanks
|
12-14-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
2566
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks. That settles it.
|
05-15-20 07:52am
|
Reply
2567
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
Thanks!
|
05-14-20 03:52am
|
Reply
2568
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Let us know what you find out. I posted the question on another porn forum and if I get an answer there I'll let everyone know here.
|
05-13-20 02:15pm
|
Reply
2569
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I've wondered the same thing. I suspect it's access to all the Team Skeet sites that are usually stand-alone, but like you, I've been too afraid to click on it and possibly be out that money.
I hope someone has the answer.
|
05-13-20 04:37am
|
Reply
2570
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Yeah, here you have to have been laid off or lost your job because of the pandemic and then you get monthly benefits. The program isn't without its problems but it was put together quickly. I'm glad we didn't all get stimulus cheques because I'd have spent mine on porn. I'd feel guilty about it, but I'd still do it.
Well, I guess that is a form of stimulus!
|
05-05-20 02:00pm
|
Reply
2571
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Nah... you guys can keep him. You can keep Celine Dion too. That's our gift to you!
|
05-04-20 03:44pm
|
Reply
2572
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I'm in Canada so there are no stimulus funds for those like me who are able to keep working. Not that I'm complaining. I'd rather work than have to get income replacement from the government. The biggest problem for me is that the Canadian dollar is taking a shit-kicking these days with the price of oil so low. One of our largest exports is oil. So the $289 USD converts to $406 CDN for me.
But it is tempting. With all those normally stand-alone sites this is a great deal.
|
05-04-20 07:10am
|
Reply
2573
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
This is a bit too rich for me but it is a good deal.
|
05-04-20 04:44am
|
Comment
2574
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
|
01-12-20 04:24pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2575
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeC's Reply
Woo hoo! Thanks for telling us about this. I'll keep my eyes open for anything on this. If you hear more can you post it in the forum or on the Team Skeet page as a comment?
|
09-04-19 03:35pm
|
