| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2351
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm in full agreement. I wouldn't need a discount to access properly remastered older porn. My favourites are from the 80s and early 90s, but I'd be happy to explore older than that too.
|
02-17-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
2352
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Before you finish congratulating me on a good spot I should mention that I had a Met Art membership a month ago and missed that connection there. D'oh!!! I'll have to keep my eye open for a discount on Met Art now... Thanks for the tip tangub.
|
02-16-12 05:32pm
|
Reply
2353
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Thanks for the advance warning on this Ken, and thanks for the obvious efforts in getting sites to make these offers.
I was figuring I'd pass on this since it isn't really my kind of site (too soft) but then some of the models look too beautiful to turn down. What's likely sealed the deal for me joining is that the model "Kylie A" appears to be "Gloria" from Skinny Super Girl, Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls. That alone is worth the admission price.
|
02-16-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
2354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That's probably the closest to reality...
|
02-16-12 12:56pm
|
Reply
2355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't want to come across as homophobic, because I'm not, or certainly not anti-gay, because I'm not that either, but for me the question is somewhat foreign because I've never really thought of it before. I suspect that if I had to choose something I'd probably use some of the same criteria as with women: youngish, fit, and A-cup breasts. Or maybe not the last one.
Demonstrating a serious double-standard though, I suspect that a guy can be perceived as sexy by a majority of people at a much older age.
|
02-16-12 12:55pm
|
Reply
2356
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Sad but true... But I hope someday that Evil Angel will realize that there are a lot of guys like you and I - older, interested in the back catalogue and willing to pay for that.
|
02-16-12 12:51pm
|
Reply
2357
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I don't recall that I had any trouble cancelling, but my memory may be hazy due to being so pissed off at the download limit. It's good to hear that they're still applying it to some people and not to others, that way I can still be mad at them.
|
02-15-12 04:38pm
|
Reply
2358
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Interesting review. I agree that they could do a better job with their older titles. Many older EA movies are classics and deserve better. I suspect that they're chasing a younger market who want the newest and they want it now and I can understand that because that's where the money would be. Given their huge back catalogue of older titles, I'd certainly support them if they created a site for just those. Old farts like you and I could get what we wanted and the younger folks could get the new stuff. (Not that I'm knocking the new stuff because I think Mike Adriano and Jay Sin are among the best out there today.)
|
02-15-12 04:35pm
|
Reply
2359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
This is a tough question, and I suspect the answer might be different depending on the day the question is asked.
And not to dodge the question even further, but I think I'd have to choose Kink.com, but I don't think I could choose from among my favourite sites there like The Training of O, Sex and Submission, Public Disgrace and Everything Butt. Kink gets the nod because of their consistency. They're consistently innovative and I can always count on them to deliver excellent scenes for a great price. The few occasions I've had to contact them for service have only furthered my respect for them as a company.
Runners-up would be softer sites like ALS Scan and FTV Girls. I'd also have to consider the Diesel Access Network (Young Legal Porn, Skinny Super Girl, 18 Only Girls, Ivana Fukalot) since they were a big surprise for me in 2011. Evil Angel would also be in the running since they offer such an excellent value for some very unique porn.
|
02-15-12 04:30pm
|
Reply
2360
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
It was a pretty good scene. I guess for me I'd have preferred her hair dark rather than the near blonde. But her preformance was great. I'm still a big fan.
|
02-15-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
2361
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
My last membership here expired just over a month ago. I wouldn't normally rejoin a site so soon but they posted the Tanner Mayes anal scene so I had to rejoin. I was AMAZED at the update schedule they've got now. What's even more impressive is that they're putting up new releases. The Tanner Mayes title was just released and these guys are making it available. And if you join through TBP they're only charging $10 for the month. This is an amazing site. I've been a long-time fan of Evil Angel for a lot of reasons and I can't think of another studio that has such a great web presence. I'm definitely increasing the frequency for rejoining this site.
|
02-14-12 12:54pm
|
Reply
2362
|
Deep Throat Love
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
This isn't exactly a reply to your comment (but thanks for adding that information), but your comment led me to check out the Porn Pros network because I have a few other sites I like there, including DTL. I checked Jurassic Cock and was surprised to see that they've only added two scenes since I was a member there some five or six months ago. To make matters worse, most of the other sites (including my other favourite, Massage Creep) don't give update information so I can't tell if it's worth joining again.
|
02-12-12 06:24am
|
Comment
2363
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
|
02-12-12 06:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I've given small, new sites a good score based on the scenes posted and reasonable expectations that the site will continue to grow. I've done that with some Kink sites when they were new and didn't feel bad about giving a high score because I know and trust Kink, and i made it clear in my review that the site was still small.
|
02-12-12 05:59am
|
Reply
2365
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for this messmer. This is really helpful.
|
02-11-12 11:46am
|
Reply
2366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's rare that I make an impulse membership purchase. I normally read everything the TBP and PU has on a site first so I can avoid surprises.
|
02-11-12 11:45am
|
Reply
2367
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Crap. Just as I was thinking about joining this site another confusing wrinkle gets added. I've avoided it in the past because of the confusing billing scheme, but that seems to be resolved. but what's this issue with credits? If I join the site can I actually download scenes or do I need to buy/earn credits to do that?
I wish this site would stop being overly complex!
|
02-08-12 08:26am
|
Reply
2368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered no, but the answer is 'sort of.' I actually did buy into (literally) the hype over the Paris Hilton sex tape and bought a copy of the DVD when it came out. I recall the price was astronomical, but Paris is my kind of girl - young, petite, small-breasted and trashy - so I was hooked. I still have the videos, though I've long since converted them to wmv so I don't need the disk. I haven't watched the Paris Hilton stuff again, but there were four 'bonus' scenes that I've watched several times. The scene with Teagan Presley alone is enough to mean that I'll always have some celebrity content in my collection.
|
02-08-12 08:21am
|
Reply
2369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I suspect that the sample group here will skew the numbers to the higher end of revisits. Most of the regulars here seems to have a number of sites that they review regularly and encourange others to visit. These reviews and recommendations have led me to some incredible sites that I might not have otherwise visited, and that's a huge plus for being a member here.
For me, it's more than five. FTV Girls, Nubiles, ALS Scan, The Training of O, Sex and Submission, Public Disgrace, Everything Butt, Videobox and Evil Angel (both sites) are in fairly regular rotation.
|
01-31-12 05:25pm
|
Reply
2370
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
For me, it says something that I generally avoid 'softer' sites but have Nubiles, FTV Girls and ALS Scan in regular rotation. These are all excellent sites and regardless of them not really being 'hard' enough for my usual preferences, I regognize quality.
|
01-31-12 05:21pm
|
Reply
2371
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
For porn, and for many other things, that's an apt description...
|
01-28-12 02:54pm
|
Reply
2372
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I knew that, and I suspect that most people would, but I hoped to avoid any confusion. I really wonder why Adust DVD Empire spun off a site with a name almost identical to crappy, fraudulent site. I'm guessing that someone didn't look around enough.
|
01-27-12 04:52pm
|
Reply
2373
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
I don't dispute what ergo says and I put a lot of trust in TBP / PU when they remove a site from their lists, but I just want to add that this Adult Empire that's been blacklisted isn't the same as the VOD site that goes by adultempire.com. The VOD site is a spin-off from the VOD site Adult DVD Empire. Both sites are an excellent source of VOD material and some downloads. I only mention this because I'd hate to think that a reputable site would lose business because they have name very similar to a disreputable site.
|
01-25-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
2374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I could have answered "yes," but opted for "I get a fair bit, but not all." It's probably a mix for me. I will download all the material a site has in a lot of cases but that isn't being indiscriminate. I spend a lot of time here and at TBP researching a site before i join to make sure it's something I want to join. Take a Kink site like Everything Butt. To them, I might look like a site ripper because I'll download EVERYTHING. But... that isn't being indiscriminate because I've applied the discrimination before I pull out my credit card. It's a site where I know I'll want everything. With other sites, I usually sort by theme and download a lot of what interests me. I have an unofficial list of stars that I look for and I'll download most of their material if there is any on the site. Then I'll poke around at my leisure and maybe 'discover' some new talent that I'd like to see. To use a counter-example, if I joined Bang Bros I'd look like a pretty light user to them because they have almost nothing that interests me. But I won't join because thanks to the information from you guys and at TBP I already know that so I simply don't join.
I'm sure I'm not the only member here who uses this method of choosing memberships.
|
01-21-12 05:54am
|
Reply
2375
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
All good points again. I certainly fit the description of a power users for the first few days of a membership. I'll scour the site for material that interests me, and I'll download that. I won't download something simply because it happens to be on the site. There has to be a reasonable expectation that I'll like what I download. There are several dozen models that I like and if a site has stuff with them I'll download it without question. If I can sort by theme, anal sex, for example, then I'lld o that, but I won't download a scene merely because it has anal sex. If the anal sex scene features a MILF with Double-Ds, then I won't DL that because that type of model doesn't do it for me. So after a few days of downloading madly I'll settle down and be a lot more selective. That's when I start looking at models I don't know in hopes of finding someone who tickle my fancy.
I can see how a DL limit might limit piracy. If a pirate has to take days or months to rip a site, they'll probably avoiding it.
|
01-21-12 05:46am
|
