| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Height isn't an issue for me but I do remember being surprised at how small stars like Gauge and Little Cinderella are. It's amazing that both did a fair bit of anal too.
|
08-06-12 09:42am
|
Reply
2177
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I should probably point out that the problems I had (they seem to be fixed now) seemed to be mostly associated with VB3 and the add-on channels that require VB3.
And I sure agree with you on the content issues. I stand by my position that VB could improve by offering one or two good updates per day rather than five crappy ones. And the constant use of repackaged and reposted scenes in a major annoyance. The only good news is that the other users will usually point out a repost.
|
08-06-12 09:39am
|
Reply
2178
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
I've found VB a little unstable for the past couple of days. It seems to take pages long to load. I've also had links die on me which I've never seen with VB. But I wouldn't go so far as to denigrate the whole site for a couple of technical glitches. I'm sure they get any problems fixed soon.
|
08-03-12 01:05pm
|
Reply
2179
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
This is odd. I wondered why they included Wow Girls when I heard it was added because while Wow Girls is obviously owned by the same group they list it under an American company rather than Diesel. When I reviewed Wow Girls I noted that it probably didn't make sense for them to include it as part of Diesel since they'd lose revenue.
Sorry to hear that this happened. Let's hope that the Diesel people sort this out.
(And I didn't know you could join sites directly from the biller. i'll have to check that out. The only potential problem I see with that is that may mean that TBP / PU wouldn't get a fee for members who click through these sites to join.)
|
07-31-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
2180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm okay with POV as long as it is done well. I don't actively seek it out as a niche, but I do like it.
|
07-31-12 04:19am
|
Reply
2181
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
I prefer WMV because I've yet to find a player that I like better than WM Player. I find the Apple player to be less useful and I find that VMC tends to pixilate a bit when you move the slider. But it does seem that more sites only offer HD is formats other than WMV.
I'm okay with the size - for now. My ISP doesn't have a download cap yet. I'm hoping that as time goes on and more and more users have increased downloads due to movies and TV that there will be pushback against download caps. But, ISP download caps appear to be only a Canadian problem.
|
07-31-12 04:18am
|
Reply
2182
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Review
Interesting review. I haven't been a member at this site in a while but i intend to go back. I had joined Wow Girls recently (which has been added to the Diesel Access network now) and I did notice that they seem to be shooting a more artsy, couples-oriented style of porn. I do like their quality so I will still rejoin, but like you I'd prefer harder-edged porn.
|
07-29-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
2183
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Great review. I'm an active porn downloader and I've never joined this site. My reason was usually the fact that the membership was confusing but they've fixed that. Now I don't have a good reason to join. And learning from your review that the offer HD in WMV format makes it more likely that I'll join soon. So many sites seem to offer HD in mp4 format. Thanks for the information.
|
07-29-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
2184
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The good thing is that you'll likely find re-mastered versions of what you downloaded back then. The site posts new material regularly but also re-masters older stuff. I was first a member maybe three or four years ago but I still like seeing models from the 90s.
|
07-29-12 12:21pm
|
Reply
2185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check out the TBP page. I read the reviews and scour the technical information so I can make an informed choice.
|
07-28-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
2186
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Moleman2040's Comment
I'm pretty sure I know the frustration that you're feeling. When I joined I faced a similar situation: my 10GB download limit would kick in at anywhere between 7 and 9GB and to completely reset it I'd need to wait 48 hours. But, as you point out, adding to the frustration was the fact that there are PU members who said they had no limits imposed on them. I recall that at the time of my membership when I was complaining about limits there was another PU member with an RK membership who said he could download all day with no limits. The icing on the cake was that the clause in the Terms of Service is so vague that I couldn't make out what it meant and RK never bothered to reply to my email asking for clarification.
I liked RK but I doubt I'll ever rejoin. I'm okay with a download limit as long as it is clearly stated and applies to everyone.
|
07-26-12 04:25am
|
Reply
2187
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the tip. Information like that is what make PU an amazing site.
|
07-26-12 04:20am
|
Reply
2188
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Interesting site... thanks for the review. While I don't like videos where I can't understand the set-up (the set-up is at least as important for me as the sex) I do like the look of most of the models and I do like the older guy / younger woman thing too. I might put this on my list as a possible visit.
|
07-24-12 07:48am
|
Reply
2189
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I have nothing to go on but reason here, but it seems to me that smaller niche sites like these would be more impacted by piracy. This is exclusive material and there isn't anything else like it out there so having it stolen would be a real disappointment. I contrast that with a site that makes porn where a girl gets picked up by some guys in a van and talked into sex. Those are a dime a dozen so I suspect that even pirates tire of those. Having said that, I still feel penalized for something that I've never done nor would do.
While this stuff would certainly even push my limits, I don't have to dig too deep in the collection for evidence of how I really, really need counselling... ;-)
|
07-24-12 07:45am
|
Reply
2190
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
My advice is to bump it waaaaaay up on your list now that it's combined with the other Diesel sites. This is exceptionally great porn.
|
07-24-12 07:41am
|
Reply
2191
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Funny, I went to IAFD to check on her age and completely missed her nationality... Thanks for clarifying that.
|
07-24-12 07:40am
|
Reply
2192
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like my women feminine...
|
07-23-12 05:25pm
|
Reply
2193
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you're right. I haven't seen any anal on the site and certainly none by Brandi. Actually, in a lot of the scenes she just sits there looking bored while another woman has sex with a guy.
|
07-23-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
2194
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Interesting review of an interesting site. I agree with you, letting a model's slight 'imperfections' shine through add layers of personality. The texture of her skin, a few freckles, etc. need to be shown!
|
07-22-12 06:10pm
|
Reply
2195
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
This is great news. Thanks for posting this.
|
07-22-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
2196
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Yes I did - thanks for that and I meant to reply. I'm coming to the end of a few memberships and rather than trying to fix FDM now I'm just using IDM while I have the free trial. Once my memberships expire I plan to follow your advice and try to find the problem. IDM works well and I've discovered how to do what I want with it but I'm reluctant to spend the $25 to licence it when free software will do everything I need. When I get started on the repair I may have to check in with you.
|
07-22-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
2197
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
alexthorn's Reply
Thanks for the update. I've reviewed the TOS and still don't see that explained, but I'll write my review taking into account this new information. The TOS that I can see at the join page is:
(by join our site You accept our TOS):
1. The site works at its best when the resolution is 1920 x 1080 (FULL HD). But You can see it without any problems even in 800x600 too.
2. The site is correctly functioning when You are using Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox. Other browsers can be working too, but their effective use is at Your own risk.
3. When You are using Mozilla Firefox make sure that You have not disabled its scripts (they are enabled by default).
4. All materials published on www.hotkinkyjo.xxx is legitimate property of this site's owners and You are not allowed to share, copy, republish or reproduce it anywhere. This material can be watched solely for personal use and only at hotkinkyjo.xxx
5. Proxy connection is not allowed.
6. All the models are 20 years or older. All content published here is legal.
7. To join this site you must be 18 years or older.
8. The site contains video materials that are accessible in 3 quality formats: 720x400, 1280x720 and FULLHD 1920x1080
9. 720x400 video format requires at least 1500Kbps downlink bandwidth to play.
10. 1280x720 video format requires at least 4Mbps downlink bandwidth to play.
11. 1920x1080 video format requires at least 8Mbps downlink bandwidth to play.
You have an amazing site and I understand your fears about piracy but I wish you'd reconsider your policy to not allow downloads. It punishes customers like me and others who don't condone or support piracy. Please reconsider!
|
07-22-12 10:25am
|
Reply
2198
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I use Free Download Manager successfully on the site. I use it to queue up downloads. The only problem is that the links seem to go dead fairly quickly so I can't load more than five or six files at one time. As for speed, I didn't have a problem.
Free Download Manager has stopped working for me and until I can figure out what went wrong I'm using a trial of Internet Download Manager. IDM worked fine on a sister site.
|
07-22-12 10:17am
|
Reply
2199
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I strongly agree with you that the price of a no-longer-updating site needs to reflect that fact. The good thing about this site is that if you had a few hours on a rainy day and a decent internet connection you could probably use the 1 day trial and get everything you wanted.
|
07-22-12 08:18am
|
Reply
2200
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks Denner. This site really does everything right and are worth a look.
|
07-22-12 08:16am
|
