| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2026
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I love these solo teen sites but they can be such a disaster. The ones I've had membership to were likely created back when dial-up was common given how crappy they are. It's good to hear that some of the sites are now up to mid-2000s tecnology!
Great review!
|
11-13-12 04:50pm
|
Comment
2027
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
|
11-13-12 09:03am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2028
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
One of the biggest advantages to having a user-driven review site like this (being affiliated with a commercial review site) is that readers get to read varying opinions. I agree with most of what you wrote but my assessment of all of that still brought me to a much higher score.
I will admit though, that while I tried to be objective I may have been swayed a bit by the fact that SSG was part of a larger AND less expensive network when I joined.
But... I still think that Gloria is one of the most perfect models working today.
Great review, BTW.
|
11-13-12 08:45am
|
Reply
2029
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
Thanks for the information. At least now I can join knowing the limitations.
|
11-13-12 08:38am
|
Reply
2030
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't mind the newer stuff, but I agree that his older work is better. Trained Teens 1 remains one of my all-time favourite movies. It was the first time I had seen Stacy Carpenter and that scene was so well done. If that was the only great scene on the DVD that would have been enough, but the scene with Gauge and Aurora Snow is also incredible. And the remaining scenes only look merely good when compared to those two even though if they were on another DVD title they'd be stand-outs there.
If it would be useful for you I could either email you a list of series and editions or even post a list as a comment.
|
11-12-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
2031
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm glad you pointed it out. Thanks.
|
11-12-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
2032
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Excellent point messmer, I'll do that right now. I agree that as it is written now someone who likes large, natural breasts might join based on my review and be disappointed.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll also reread my Naughty America review to see if that could use a tweak too.
|
11-12-12 03:20pm
|
Reply
2033
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Multiple camera angles are essential for an interesting scene. The only exception is if part of the scene set-up is that it is a single angle, as is often the case in POV scenes (though the angle changes as the stars move into different positions), hidden-camera porn and casting shoots where the camera is mounted in one spot. I don't actively seek out hidden-camera and casting porn for because of the fixed camera, but I will download it if it has a model I like.
|
11-12-12 11:30am
|
Reply
2034
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Interesting review. I love 'classic' porn from the late 80s through to the mid 90s and this site seems to have a lot to offer. I might give this site a try now that I know what the flaws are.
One question: the tour pages are arranged to suggest that the scenes are listed separately. Is there an option in the member pages to select a movie and see all the scenes in that movie (like they do at Videobox)?
|
11-12-12 11:27am
|
Reply
2035
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I try not to join a site that has no reviews but I have done it too. I've been burned a couple of times but have mostly been successful. The one absolute no-no for me is an unreviewed site that doesn't use a reputable biller.
|
11-10-12 08:31am
|
Reply
2036
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Like you, I'm a big fan of Kink's sites. But also like you, I've noticed some subtle changes in several of them over the past while. Not necessarily bad changes, but definitely changes. Like, for example, Everything Butt where the focus now seems more on anal sex (I can't imagine I'm actually complaining about anal sex!) when in the older videos it was more about intense ass play.
I agree with you that the newer videos at PD aren't as public or as disgraceful as some of the older videos. I suspect a lot of that has to do with Kink not wanting to bring the hammer down on themselves.
Not to get too far off topic, but if you haven't seen it already check out the scene with Molly and Steve Holmes. She bound and made to wash car windows in traffic in a European city. Definitely public, and even though she's having a lot of fun it is obviously disgraceful too.
Another more recent favourite is with Samia Duarte. They take her out into a crowd at night and bind her too a lamppost while people take pics.
Damn I wish there were more good public nudity sites out there...
(Great review, by the way!)
|
11-07-12 05:49pm
|
Reply
2037
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Sorry to hear that... but I'm glad it wasn't something that I was doing wrong...
|
11-07-12 04:56pm
|
Reply
2038
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I don't know about 'feeble'! I had the time to put a bit more detail into mine but they all contribute. I don't know abouot you, but I try to read all the reviews before joining a site.
|
11-07-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
2039
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I never add the pre-checked cross-sells as a negative but I should. There is nothing positive about them, that's for sure. I have no problem with an offer that I actually have to accept, but I do wish that sites would realize how negatively they're perceived by active buyers. I've been burned a few times too...
|
11-07-12 01:34pm
|
Reply
2040
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thank you, sir!
|
11-07-12 01:32pm
|
Reply
2041
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
It may be that you were going for a different file type or resolution. I should clarify that in no cases was the entire scene missing, just the file type and resolution that I wanted. In those cases I just took a different type or resolution.
|
11-07-12 01:31pm
|
Reply
2042
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Definitely. But even the $10 deal we usually get is a good deal too.
|
11-07-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
2043
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't actively seek DP scenes out but if it has a female star that I like I'll usually download it anyway. My preference by far is one man and one woman - and that man needs to realize he's just a prop. If there is to be more than one male then bring in a bunch and turn it into a gang bang.
|
11-06-12 08:13am
|
Reply
2044
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the comments slutty. With the $5 membership offer I didn't really take a big risk when I hoped to find some scenes that I'd like. I think with the standard discount offered here it is still a great deal. I suspect that I'll actually come back to the site again but not on the same frequency as I do with other repeat memberships.
|
11-06-12 08:10am
|
Reply
2045
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I wonder if this might be part of their business model. Rather than simply cancelling online they make you call them and listen to their pitch to stay. I'd guess that's an expensive way to do business.
|
11-05-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
2046
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
me too. I'd hate to have to call someone to resolve an issue that could easily be fixed online like thousands of other adult sites do.
|
11-05-12 04:00pm
|
Reply
2047
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Interesting question… I suspect that a lot of PU members will weigh in on this one given the discount the site offered us this month.
This wasn’t a site on my radar because they seem to market themselves as being for people who like MILFs and large breasts, and that doesn’t describe my interests. But I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was a lot of material to my liking – younger, more petite models. I can’t pick a favourite, but certainly sites like My Sister’s Hot Friend, Naughty Bookworms, Naughty Athletics and SoCal Coeds made this a good value.
|
11-05-12 01:47pm
|
Reply
2048
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
Twisty's is a site that's been on the outer edge of my radar for a while. Thanks to your thorough review I think it may have been bumped up a bit since you answered some questions that I've had. The one bit of bad news is the difficulty you had cancelling your membership. That might be a deal-breaker for me.
|
11-04-12 04:19am
|
Reply
2049
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not to come across as being too anal (pun not intended...) but I write reviews in MS Word and copy them into the PU review page. I do that because it takes me days to write a review but that also means it gets edited many times before it gets posted so by that time any typos should have been caught by either me or spell-check.
|
11-04-12 04:14am
|
Reply
2050
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I suspect that since we're likely a fairly broad cross-section of society in terms of nationality, age, interests, education, work experience and incomes that we're probably a wide swath regarding intelligence too. So on that alone I chose average.
Having said that, please indulge me on a bit of a rant: one thing that always impresses me about the quality of posts on this site is that even if English isn;t a posters mother tongue everyone follows bacis rules of grammar and punctuation. And no one regularly posts in 'text speak,' which, in my opinion, is usually the mark of someone who isn't all that bright when it is used in a context that doeasn't require text speak. And part of not being terribly bright is the inability to discern when one should and should not use 'text speak.' I don't read or participate in too many other forums on any topic, but I really like that it is rare that we see someone post something in text gibberish.
So on that point alone, regardless of where each of us falls on an IQ scale, we're above average.
|
10-31-12 08:49am
|
